I would have guessed 130 kWh x 2.1 miles/kw = 273. You came very close. Thanks for the data. By the way Dave, I just did 450 miles one way on I-20. We got ~2.31 miles/kw on the 22's at 78-80 mph.
As a comparison to a Tesla Y on average, over a year, winter summer in Ca, commuting driving 78-80, I get 3.5 miles/kw (285 w/mile as the Tesla computer shows). I'm thinking of switching to this truck but the energy cost will go up 52%. Hmmm...
86% of range at 75mph is pretty good. I've driven Teslas for 7.5 yrs now and when I unplug from a supercharger, I try to have 30% more range than needed to get to my next stop.
Lol yeah his content is pretty boring. I think it’s the monotone voice and never showing his face makes it super uninteresting. Just constructive criticism.
I would take it in for service immediately, something maybe loose. It was one thing that the steering wheel was off but now that warning popped up, the issue could be getting worse. Be safe!
Why do they not have a 1 cylinder diesel turbo engine running just as a non stop charging motor so as a hybrid setup you get 1000 plus mile range.... i never understand this crazy one or the other stuff.
As long as you have a reliable charging network (and now Rivians can Supercharge and the Rivian Adventure Network is very solid in places that it has chargers), 1% club for life! Really I aim for around 10% but if it's less that's fine.
@evdave528 Less for sure, but I'm expecting a non linear range drop. The aero drag portion of road load increases as a square of vehicle speed theoretically. What I'm trying to get a feel of is that is 55mph constant Speed gets you EPA range (for example), and 65mph gets you a 20% range drop, is 85mph ~40% range drop on something as big as an R1T?
Somebody has a Model Y Long Range video where it gets the then EPA 300 miles at 60, about 270 or so at 70, and 240 at 80 on 100% battery. Rivian might beat that a little, at least percentage wise. And the Max pack would definitely do more. I think.
@@bigoldjim4696 it’s going to lose mileage as a percentage of its total range the same as a Y or any other EV from 60 to 80 in drag force but it will also lose more due to more rolling resistance on tires due to higher weight.
A normal person will start looking for a charger when you get in the 20's SOC. Posted 75mph Hwy everyone is going 80-85. If you are doing 75 you are getting passed by 18 Wheelers. MY guess is that when you are doing 85mph moving along with traffic, you will get a little over 100 miles of range by the time you start looking for a charger.
@@evdave528 As the car was calculating, I too was calculating using Laplace Transformation to verify if the Arrival battery potential percentage was a close approximation to my predicted Domain Vs the Frequency of usage as compared to the distance traveled to the supposition of the X,Y of any possible available charging station in the general proximity of arrival position. Postulated failure to do so would result in limp mode and then static mode on the shoulder of the autobahn. Not a safe posture as the Danger is significant and not to mention illegal unless you convince the local authorities it is a break down and not due to lack of fuel/electrons.
10% is the sweet spot for getting to a charger. A little less if you have a reliable (so Tesla at this time) network. Those charging miles are almost free, time wise. I would leave more buffer in a CCS car. Rivians can Supercharge now.
That is really good at 75 mph my truck after summer and winter driving a year on mixed driving and some 0-60 runs for my friends is exactly 2.2mi/kwh with 20 inch offroad wheels.
Why drive against hurricane force wind levels? Why not 90 mph? Look, these “real world tests” are endorsing dangerous driving practices on public roads. As to EVs, driving fast between chargers is highly illogical. It’s adds a higher cost, wears out tires and cause higher battery temperatures! Driving at or below posted speed limits uses less energy per mile increasing the range. A 77 kw battery pack with 25% increase in efficiency is far cheaper. There is no time benefit in being wasteful.
Up to a point, it's less time to drive fast and charge more. Run the battery down to 5-10%, leave the charger when it starts to taper off, and do it again.
Great range test! You sounded like an old pro. A newbie would have been freaking out.
Thanks 👍
I would have guessed 130 kWh x 2.1 miles/kw = 273. You came very close. Thanks for the data. By the way Dave, I just did 450 miles one way on I-20. We got ~2.31 miles/kw on the 22's at 78-80 mph.
As a comparison to a Tesla Y on average, over a year, winter summer in Ca, commuting driving 78-80, I get 3.5 miles/kw (285 w/mile as the Tesla computer shows). I'm thinking of switching to this truck but the energy cost will go up 52%. Hmmm...
The 20's with AT tires have the worst effect for the range as it claims to have about 20 to 35 miles less range
Gotta do these tests in the middle of the night like Out of Spec ❤
It’s amazing how much we have learned electric vehicles are truly the best cars out there.
Love your channel Dave thanks for making great content
Glad you like them!
86% of range at 75mph is pretty good. I've driven Teslas for 7.5 yrs now and when I unplug from a supercharger, I try to have 30% more range than needed to get to my next stop.
The nav now factors wind and terrain, I rely on the arrival percentage it’s quite accurate now.
Hank is class, "like whatever Dave, just drive!" , Luna looks so friendly. Good test 75 is a good travelling speed
My wife takes them everywhere they are the best car dogs.
Great video! The interior of the car is so compelling.
It really is!
I watched your video and slept like a baby. Thanks! I needed the rest.
Lol yeah his content is pretty boring. I think it’s the monotone voice and never showing his face makes it super uninteresting. Just constructive criticism.
Glad I could help!
nice video dear !! 🎉🎉
I would take it in for service immediately, something maybe loose. It was one thing that the steering wheel was off but now that warning popped up, the issue could be getting worse. Be safe!
The linkage is solid, just the wheel is off but understand I can adjust it with new software
We have a black lab Luna as well but she is still a pup.
you can do the wheel alignment in the service menu yourself now. They just added this in the last update ruclips.net/video/FK38Neicl80/видео.html
Cool I’ll check thanks
How do you like your Rivian now a few more months of ownership?
Nice. Z-row, Z-row. Love it!
Oh yeah!
Good vid. Question: what's the brown cover you have on the top of your dash?
Velvet, it’s Black used to Eat light reflections for video out the window
@@evdave528 Good idea. Thanks.
You are INSANE!! "I'm not worried, unless it keels over and dies" "Good Customer experience" I was on the edge of my seat that last mile GREAT VIDEO!!
That steering wheel would drive me nuts. You should definitely get them to even that baby.
Why do they not have a 1 cylinder diesel turbo engine running just as a non stop charging motor so as a hybrid setup you get 1000 plus mile range.... i never understand this crazy one or the other stuff.
I suppose you pee in a bottle so you don’t have to stop, that’s cool I did that years ago too
My wife and I used to suffer terribly from range anxiety, but anymore, if we arrive with more than 1% it's all good.😂
Exactly!!
As long as you have a reliable charging network (and now Rivians can Supercharge and the Rivian Adventure Network is very solid in places that it has chargers), 1% club for life! Really I aim for around 10% but if it's less that's fine.
If your steering wheel is offset then you probably do need your wheels aligned
Can you try it with 85mph? Everyone in Michigan is doing 85 on highways..
It would be a little less, it tends to be linear
@evdave528 Less for sure, but I'm expecting a non linear range drop. The aero drag portion of road load increases as a square of vehicle speed theoretically. What I'm trying to get a feel of is that is 55mph constant Speed gets you EPA range (for example), and 65mph gets you a 20% range drop, is 85mph ~40% range drop on something as big as an R1T?
@@MADMAX7330 Yes, Drag force in lbs is 0.5 * ρ * V^2 * S * Cd.
Somebody has a Model Y Long Range video where it gets the then EPA 300 miles at 60, about 270 or so at 70, and 240 at 80 on 100% battery. Rivian might beat that a little, at least percentage wise. And the Max pack would definitely do more. I think.
@@bigoldjim4696 it’s going to lose mileage as a percentage of its total range the same as a Y or any other EV from 60 to 80 in drag force but it will also lose more due to more rolling resistance on tires due to higher weight.
Wonder how much letting battery get that low effects life of battery?
It was very low for a few minutes, no issues
What weather and gps app do you on your phone which you showed in the video?
My Radar
What was the average consumption? Can you figure out the buffer from that?
Probably but I don’t know how big the hidden buffer is. I wanted to use the available gages to drive with as a normal driver would do
21’’ all purpose doing 75mph i was definitely get 300mile
A normal person will start looking for a charger when you get in the 20's SOC. Posted 75mph Hwy everyone is going 80-85. If you are doing 75 you are getting passed by 18 Wheelers. MY guess is that when you are doing 85mph moving along with traffic, you will get a little over 100 miles of range by the time you start looking for a charger.
The car calculates the Arrival battery percentage, just keep an eye on that and you’re golden
@@evdave528 As the car was calculating, I too was calculating using Laplace Transformation to verify if the Arrival battery potential percentage was a close approximation to my predicted Domain Vs the Frequency of usage as compared to the distance traveled to the supposition of the X,Y of any possible available charging station in the general proximity of arrival position. Postulated failure to do so would result in limp mode and then static mode on the shoulder of the autobahn. Not a safe posture as the Danger is significant and not to mention illegal unless you convince the local authorities it is a break down and not due to lack of fuel/electrons.
10% is the sweet spot for getting to a charger. A little less if you have a reliable (so Tesla at this time) network. Those charging miles are almost free, time wise. I would leave more buffer in a CCS car. Rivians can Supercharge now.
I wonder what the miles per kilowatt was.
I think it was like 2.2 mi/kWh
That is really good at 75 mph my truck after summer and winter driving a year on mixed driving and some 0-60 runs for my friends is exactly 2.2mi/kwh with 20 inch offroad wheels.
0:40 years ago 3578
Why drive against hurricane force wind levels? Why not 90 mph? Look, these “real world tests” are endorsing dangerous driving practices on public roads. As to EVs, driving fast between chargers is highly illogical. It’s adds a higher cost, wears out tires and cause higher battery temperatures! Driving at or below posted speed limits uses less energy per mile increasing the range. A 77 kw battery pack with 25% increase in efficiency is far cheaper. There is no time benefit in being wasteful.
Up to a point, it's less time to drive fast and charge more. Run the battery down to 5-10%, leave the charger when it starts to taper off, and do it again.