Pre War Smith and Wesson N Frame Revolvers! The Triple Lock and Hand efrctor models!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 46

  • @tonymatt5710
    @tonymatt5710 3 месяца назад +7

    Bill Jordan told me he carried a 1917 when he was in the Marines in the second world war he modified it a shorter barrel an action job, served him well.

  • @45-70Guy
    @45-70Guy 3 месяца назад +4

    Great video guys. Love the old history and keeping it alive. Elmer Keith would be proud to see our younger generation still as excited about these revolvers as they were back in the day.
    Those Keith loads and skeeter loads in them old revolvers are all we could ask for.

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  3 месяца назад +1

      Thank you! We do love those old Smith and Wessons! There's just something special about those pre war guns.

  • @CADMike
    @CADMike 9 месяцев назад +3

    Love the Smith & Wessons! Keep em coming please. I would also like to see something on the .38/44 outdoorsman.

  • @Ben_not_10
    @Ben_not_10 4 месяца назад +3

    IMO smith and Wesson needs to come out with a 6.5” 44 magnum, fixed sight N Frame as an homage to the triple lock in their Classic line. A 6.5” Triple Lock is one of the sexiest revolvers they ever madeX

  • @lewissmith8743
    @lewissmith8743 9 месяцев назад +1

    A great collection of historical firearms to be proud of. Thank you gentleman for sharing and I look forward to more videos of old Smith and Wesson hand ejector 's , heavy duties and others. Thanks again for the history.

  • @RevolverTv
    @RevolverTv Месяц назад

    Maybe a full video soon on all of the n frame 357s? Like registered magnums 27s 28s and such?

  • @tannerwashburn4002
    @tannerwashburn4002 3 месяца назад +1

    Great video! I got a commercial 1917 a few years back. I sent S&W the serial number and they sent me a letter saying it was produced in the 1920s (can't remember the exact year off the top of my head). It's a pretty cool revolver! If you guys ever talk about the hand ejectors again you could mention the 1917 he used in Raiders of the Lost Ark (and the hi-power used).

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  3 месяца назад +1

      Sweet! We are going to do a Pearce Brothers top 10 movie guns and I'm we will definitely mention Indiana! Great movies!

    • @tannerwashburn4002
      @tannerwashburn4002 3 месяца назад

      @@PearceBrothersGearGuide Right on!

  • @MrNedsaabdickerson
    @MrNedsaabdickerson 9 месяцев назад +3

    Damn you guys have a nice S&W Collection.

  • @Ben_not_10
    @Ben_not_10 6 месяцев назад +1

    A triple lock target model in either 44 special or 45 colt is my holy grail gun.

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  6 месяцев назад

      They are hard to find... and not cheap!

    • @Ben_not_10
      @Ben_not_10 6 месяцев назад

      @@PearceBrothersGearGuide that and a post war model 21 or Pre 21 in 44 special with a 6.5” barrel. There have been occasions I’ve seen pre and post model 21s go for more money than a shooter grade British marked triple lock.

    • @Ben_not_10
      @Ben_not_10 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@PearceBrothersGearGuide the most gut twisting thing I ever saw though was in a news article about a buy back in some big city and one of the photos showed a side shot of a some of the guns they had “gotten off the streets” and one them them was a either a triple lock target model or a third model hand ejector target. It had a shrouded ejector rod and the bore was too large to have been a 38/44 Outdoorsman.

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  6 месяцев назад

      @Ben_not_10 that's terrible! And they probably only gave then like 200 for it 🤦‍♂️

  • @justinmishler6758
    @justinmishler6758 9 месяцев назад +1

    Cool video guys, you’re lucky to have all those great old smiths. Definitely would like to see 38/44 heavy duty/ outdoorsman video

  • @chipchaffee2416
    @chipchaffee2416 3 месяца назад +2

    I would like to know were you got your hat jake . I’ve worn one similar to that for over 40 yrs . It’s getting thin so to speak . As sad as it makes me I need to replace it . Will be buried with the original along with my mountain gun in 44 mag . Thanks for the great videos.

    • @45-70Guy
      @45-70Guy 3 месяца назад

      Good choice. Those 4” smiths are 1 I’d never sell

  • @kevinward8915
    @kevinward8915 3 месяца назад +1

    Good video guys, love a N frame Smith

  • @gregentwistle5105
    @gregentwistle5105 3 месяца назад +1

    Nice job guys!

  • @johnward8846
    @johnward8846 2 месяца назад

    Well done...

  • @jeremyp2295
    @jeremyp2295 9 месяцев назад

    Casually passes the registered magnum across the table like it was a common ruger gp. Can't wait for more information I didn't know about the rifling machinery from sharps. I have a newer model 21 44 special 4 inch that I put a set of herrets trooper Jordan stocks on. And i have a Brazilian model 1917. The smiths are light smooth and balanced nicely. The colt new service /1917 are just bigger heavier and robust. And i feel like they recoil heavier than the Smith. I would love to have model 27 eventually. I wonder if the popularity of the registered magnum will fade as more younger people start collecting because I feel like it's something that you have to be in the know to appreciate.

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  9 месяцев назад

      Thanks! You can't go wrong with a pre war Smith and Wesson! It might be a fun video to compare the 1917 to the Colt new service. Hopefully the Registered Magnum gets less desirable but we will see. Both of the ones we used in the video belong to our Dad and we would like to have some of our own haha

  • @Ben_not_10
    @Ben_not_10 4 месяца назад +1

    Wait only 2,000 commercial guns? Just picked up a nickeled 1917 for $400. No US Property marks anywhere on the gun. One of my gunsmiths looked up the number and said it’s from 1926. Put another $100 into a new set of service grips, lanyard loop, and the action was slightly outta time.
    Honestly though I’m a little perplexed why the 1917 wasn’t a bigger success in the interwar period. It’s not K frame M&P light but it’s very well balanced and much easier than any of the 38 caliber N frames. The star/moon clips make reloading much faster and easier. You’d have ammo compatibility with the government and could purchase surplus guns and parts from government stores as well as ammo for training. With standard 230 grain loads it’s not that much more difficult to shoot or to train to shoot than a typical K frame or the Colt Official Police. Like did smith just promote the K frame over the 1917 or was it just too awkward a revolver for its time?

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  4 месяца назад

      Good question. My take on this is that between the wars there were a lot of Surplus 1917 Revolvers on the market that were surplused out after ww1. Another factor is that the Great Depression really affected new gun sales in the 30s.

  • @russellwylie
    @russellwylie Месяц назад

    What you got agaist the Heavy duty?

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  Месяц назад

      Nothing! They are great handguns. This video was mostly focusing on the 44/45 pre war n frames. We will have a video on the future on registered magnums, heavy duty's,, outdoorsman's etc

  • @pauldonner9707
    @pauldonner9707 3 месяца назад +1

    You guys are great! Love the content. Love the guns. But PLEASE lose that annoying background noise! Cymbals?

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  3 месяца назад

      We've upgraded the mic since this video and our editing skills have greatly improved! Thanks for watching!

    • @pauldonner9707
      @pauldonner9707 3 месяца назад +1

      @@PearceBrothersGearGuide Great! Look forward to seeing (and hearing) lots more from you guys! Always a big fan of your dad’s writing as well!

    • @PearceBrothersGearGuide
      @PearceBrothersGearGuide  3 месяца назад +1

      @@pauldonner9707 thank you! We appreciate the support!

  • @Elguapo59
    @Elguapo59 9 месяцев назад +1

    Dick had to go and ruin that poor 1917!

  • @DRay-or4tc
    @DRay-or4tc Месяц назад

    That’s a Dandy!