Thanks a lot Brian! You’ve helped me a lot in my undergraduate course with your videos on Control Theory and now that i am working as a systems engineer this video serie was super useful. Never stop making these videos ❤
Thank you Brian for making these series. I'm feeling sad that this playlist has only 5 videos.🥲Hope you make more videos covering the concepts of Systems Engineering.🙂
Is more than that, but it is a good first definition. SE is all around the system, while PM is around the project. Of course SE and PM touch each other and share many things, but both are different. SE is the system (to be created and developed) management!
"NASA systems engineering ENGINE processes" are bidirectional ("top-down" and "bottom-up") and also recursive and iterative processes on "the PBS" and "the WBS" throughout the project life cycle...NASA Systems Engineering Handbook...NASA SP 6105 Rev 01 2007.
NASA with their ridiculous cost over runs and failure to meet or keep deadlines and/or schedules is a horrific example in any form of use. I know first hand as I worked at the Space Center for over 20 years.
I wish my company will adapt this systems engineering in our business. The systems we work on are so vast and complex that the only people who full understand it are the ones close to their retirement and we, the mere mortals struggle through our careers.
This is a good explanation of modeling the building of a system, but not all problems are resolved by building something. Modeling processes via Monte Carlo simulations for instance is an example of where we might model something that might not require the building of anything, at all.
Great video, would be interesting to know how this can aid a more agile approach to traditional systems engineering projects. The software development cycles are so fast - can we emulate this in systems engineering? (Linking MBSE with rapid prototyping)
For most safety and mission critical systems development, AGILE is not suited. Its more suitable and fruitful for less critical and relatively super less complex SW applications. Why? Because for two great reasons: 1) Agility in AGILE can affect the rigor and time required to strictly adhere to the processes defined as per Guidelines and Certification needs. 2) Functional complexity is not possible to be broken down to such small pieces where AGILE can be valuable and profitable.
Good video. By the way, I have a problem. Hello, Matlab technicals. As a MacbookPro user, apple has introduced ARM MacBook this year. Would you introduce Matlab R2021 for ARM mac (M1 chip)? Since I would like to update my old computer. Thanks!
after 7 years of working in R&D i can say that this is the best description of how a product is developed, sooooooooooo true.
What a fantastic short Systems Engineering series! Thanks so much, Brian!
Thank you Brian for the amazing system engineering Series
Thanks a lot Brian! You’ve helped me a lot in my undergraduate course with your videos on Control Theory and now that i am working as a systems engineer this video serie was super useful. Never stop making these videos ❤
Thank you Brian for making these series. I'm feeling sad that this playlist has only 5 videos.🥲Hope you make more videos covering the concepts of Systems Engineering.🙂
As I understood from this series, system engineering is the technical version of project management. I hope I understood ✅
Is more than that, but it is a good first definition. SE is all around the system, while PM is around the project. Of course SE and PM touch each other and share many things, but both are different. SE is the system (to be created and developed) management!
@@gengistr4566 majority of the times where we are dealing with "complex" systems. the "Projects" are actually "the systems". Right?
Just stumbled on these videos. I love this breakdown. Thank you. ❤
Awesome to hear! Thanks for the comment ♥
"NASA systems engineering ENGINE processes" are bidirectional ("top-down" and "bottom-up") and also recursive and iterative processes on "the PBS" and "the WBS" throughout the project life cycle...NASA Systems Engineering Handbook...NASA SP 6105 Rev 01 2007.
NASA with their ridiculous cost over runs and failure to meet or keep deadlines and/or schedules is a horrific example in any form of use. I know first hand as I worked at the Space Center for over 20 years.
I wish my company will adapt this systems engineering in our business. The systems we work on are so vast and complex that the only people who full understand it are the ones close to their retirement and we, the mere mortals struggle through our careers.
thanks for the great video, it is very helpful，key points clearly explained
Loved this series.
Best tutorial ever! thank you so much!
Completed the playlist, Thanks.
💯
This is a good explanation of modeling the building of a system, but not all problems are resolved by building something.
Modeling processes via Monte Carlo simulations for instance is an example of where we might model something that might not require the building of anything, at all.
Great video, would be interesting to know how this can aid a more agile approach to traditional systems engineering projects. The software development cycles are so fast - can we emulate this in systems engineering? (Linking MBSE with rapid prototyping)
For most safety and mission critical systems development, AGILE is not suited. Its more suitable and fruitful for less critical and relatively super less complex SW applications. Why?
Because for two great reasons:
1) Agility in AGILE can affect the rigor and time required to strictly adhere to the processes defined as per Guidelines and Certification needs.
2) Functional complexity is not possible to be broken down to such small pieces where AGILE can be valuable and profitable.
so, top-down approach is first-principles thinking?
What's the tool used looks ideal for the job and would be handy.
MATLAB/Simulink
What software is this? the modeling tool
What software are you using?
why is the SE not wearing Mask but all the others are ;) . Is he a Superman!?
I drew the SE person isolated so no need for a mask, the others were in a group ;)
@@BrianBDouglas oh i see :) keep up the good work Brian! :) i look forward to your videos :)
Haha.. I liked how everyone is wearing a mask.
Good video. By the way, I have a problem.
Hello, Matlab technicals. As a MacbookPro user, apple has introduced ARM MacBook this year. Would you introduce Matlab R2021 for ARM mac (M1 chip)? Since I would like to update my old computer. Thanks!