There is a plot hole in the last 5 minutes. Until then the story was compelling and the delivery was well done. It appears that a second ending was superimposed on the first ending. Perhaps a necessary paragraph was deleted. In most wars cleanup operations are necessary, but the necessary signal that this was the case was missing and it just seems to be a repetition of the first ending.
I've been an avid SciFi fan since the 1960s, and was already into the printed word when I was captivated by the original Star Trek. These old stories have probably been fed to the AIs as templates. Many of the current crop of SciFi videos seem to be using the early stories and even copying from each other. In a dejavu moment, when I recognize the source, I stop watching unless there is enough originality to keep me interested. To answer your question more directly, I recognize some stories and refer to them by author influence. Sometimes it's distinctly Andre Norton, for example, but usually they combine the source so it might be Norton with Burroughs or Kline or even Isaac Asimov.
This story is ridiculous and badly written. No enemy that advanced is going to sit back and wait for days while those they have come to conquer get organized.
Ive heard this story 15 times in the 2 months ive been listening to these stories.
My only question is,
Where is President Chan and General Marcus?
There is a plot hole in the last 5 minutes. Until then the story was compelling and the delivery was well done. It appears that a second ending was superimposed on the first ending. Perhaps a necessary paragraph was deleted. In most wars cleanup operations are necessary, but the necessary signal that this was the case was missing and it just seems to be a repetition of the first ending.
Okay, you're starting to have issues with repeating phrases. Just to give you all a warning. Besides that a great story😊
It is always a good idea to stick with the story outline. Started good but ultimately disappointing
Who writes these stories? Is it one author?
i suspect AI tbh
I've been an avid SciFi fan since the 1960s, and was already into the printed word when I was captivated by the original Star Trek. These old stories have probably been fed to the AIs as templates. Many of the current crop of SciFi videos seem to be using the early stories and even copying from each other. In a dejavu moment, when I recognize the source, I stop watching unless there is enough originality to keep me interested.
To answer your question more directly, I recognize some stories and refer to them by author influence. Sometimes it's distinctly Andre Norton, for example, but usually they combine the source so it might be Norton with Burroughs or Kline or even Isaac Asimov.
Hernandez Patricia Gonzalez Paul Young Sarah
This story is ridiculous and badly written. No enemy that advanced is going to sit back and wait for days while those they have come to conquer get organized.