Doesn’t seem like Pro way to make it. Practical terms you gotta be very fast. Depending on the dimension available you could have created a block and added a cut extrudes on both sides.
Good job but some small mistake is there! Try to reduce the commands for effective editing. And you don't need to use loft here just extrude cut is enough . But you know this can be also an another way !
Thanks for creating this video and file. This "simple" geometry has some "unexplained" traps when creating fillets and chamfers. Question. How did you know to use the "special" chamfer option [face to face] . I tried the regular chamfer option with same size, but it Failed when creating the fillet. Furthermore, I had some Fillet fails when simple fillet @ 5.00, fillet parameters[Symmetric, 5.00, Profile=Circular)" I found the solution if I changed, either: a.) R=4.99 b.) Fillet Parameter > Profile = Curvature Continuous
Thank you so much for your comment! 😊 I'm really glad you found the video helpful. I'll definitely give your solutions a try and explore the differences between the chamfer options and fillet parameters you faced. stay tuned!
In my case, the regular angle-distance chamfer worked. The face-to-face chamfer is better for evenly distributing chamfers on curved faces, especially when both faces are curved. Try it on a cylinder (50mm diameter, over 50mm long) with a wavy top. Apply both simple and face-to-face chamfers to compare the difference!. Then, try adding the same radius fillet to one half of the cylinder
You really have no idea about this program, something that can be done in 3 features ( boss extrude, cut extrude and fillet). Have you ever seen a complicated model?
Couldn't this be done faster using two unmerged extrudes, then intersecting the common volume, then adding fillets?this could have taken nearly half the time of the vid. Still nice work.
Je trouve que cette méthode est bien compliquée pour rien. J'aurai fait un bloc rectangulaire puis ensuite utilisé la fonction enlèvement de matière sur une face et ensuite sur l'autre face.
So nice this tuto sir
Doesn’t seem like Pro way to make it. Practical terms you gotta be very fast. Depending on the dimension available you could have created a block and added a cut extrudes on both sides.
I dont understand why You Merge chamfers with fillets. Do You know You can do fillets and chamfers in only one operation?
so many features for this model??? it can be done with 2-3 features
We love your passion to provide great videos!
great cadcam videos is hard to find
Good job but some small mistake is there! Try to reduce the commands for effective editing. And you don't need to use loft here just extrude cut is enough . But you know this can be also an another way !
Yeah, this can be done in various ways beyond just the extrude cut feature, as you mentioned. Thanks
So helpful, you show some details wich make the diference.
keep up the good work
ruclips.net/video/aP8C6ZlJkJw/видео.html Could it be simpler?
Thanks for explaining the design so well! Glad the video helped with the advanced techniques in MicroStation. 👍👍
Loved how you used the fillet - it saved lot of time
Thanks for creating this video and file. This "simple" geometry has some "unexplained" traps when creating fillets and chamfers.
Question. How did you know to use the "special" chamfer option [face to face] .
I tried the regular chamfer option with same size, but it Failed when creating the fillet.
Furthermore, I had some Fillet fails when simple fillet @ 5.00, fillet parameters[Symmetric, 5.00, Profile=Circular)"
I found the solution if I changed, either:
a.) R=4.99
b.) Fillet Parameter > Profile = Curvature Continuous
Thank you so much for your comment! 😊 I'm really glad you found the video helpful. I'll definitely give your solutions a try and explore the differences between the chamfer options and fillet parameters you faced.
stay tuned!
In my case, the regular angle-distance chamfer worked. The face-to-face chamfer is better for evenly distributing chamfers on curved faces, especially when both faces are curved.
Try it on a cylinder (50mm diameter, over 50mm long) with a wavy top. Apply both simple and face-to-face chamfers to compare the difference!. Then, try adding the same radius fillet to one half of the cylinder
Зачем так сложно? достаточно было сделать брусок с двумя дырками и сделать два выреза формы. справа и сверху
You really have no idea about this program, something that can be done in 3 features ( boss extrude, cut extrude and fillet). Have you ever seen a complicated model?
Couldn't this be done faster using two unmerged extrudes, then intersecting the common volume, then adding fillets?this could have taken nearly half the time of the vid. Still nice work.
Simple CAD Channel : 'I give you Complex 3D Model'
Je trouve que cette méthode est bien compliquée pour rien.
J'aurai fait un bloc rectangulaire puis ensuite utilisé la fonction enlèvement de matière sur une face et ensuite sur l'autre face.
Weldon sir
great tutorial!
Thanks!
Nice video
But its not difficult model