I do not really care about how fast it reaches a speed, I care about the feeling that you have when you get pushed back in the seat. My local airport in Romania (Craiova) only has an 8k feet runway and that feeling is just over the world.
@@cheesebusiness when it comes to aviation, i only speak “miles”. when it comes to day to day life, i speak “kilometers”. i know it’s weird, it may confuse people, i was confused when i started having interest in aviation, but you jet get used to converting.
Nice work sir. In reality airliners don't accelerate at max power. In fact they run at the lowest (safe) rate in order to save fuel and reduce fatigue on the engines. Every takeoff power setting is calculated based on runway length and aircraft weight. The thrust setting is derated accordingly. The quickest jet is probably the 757, high power to weight ratio.
That makes sense, it still feels fast, faster than this, there are modded cars doing it in 6. I’d love to feel a jet at max power, better yet a fighter jet like F22 or F18
Yesterday we decided to took off with Toga due to increase in tailwind in the last moment. A320neo. Crazy the pulling power. Reached Vr like in no time
That will have been derated like probably only 70% throttle and when it started around the 100kph speed it was clearly less. They do this for engine life and fuel consumption. So in reality if this was nearly empty and at full throttle it would be much much quicker. It's like putting 5 people and luggage in a golf r and only using part throttle or the midrange and then saying an ibiza cupra will beat it. I don't know what car you have so you may still beat it when it's 100% throttle and empty but you get my point
So first on the a320 u mostly use flex temperature which gets calculated based on the aircraft loading but also weather condition aswell as if u use packs and or anti ice on departure. There are some techniques mainly used on smaller airports like saba for example where u hold the brake till the engines spooled up in order to take off faster. The procedure on the a320 is that u put the throttle to 50N1 and wait for the engines to spool up and be stable this take 5 to 10 seconds as u can also see in the beginning after that the pilots set the thrust to the desired settings. The a320 got Detens on the throttle quadrant they either use flex or toga after take off the pilots hold a 12.5 to 20 degree angle and hold their v2 speed after around 1200 feet they reach the thr reduction alltitute where they put the trust into the climb position and also accelerate and also put the flaps up. Beneath 10000ft the plane isn’t allowed to go faster then 250knts. For the Boeing it’s kinda the same instead of 50 u use 40 n1 and different to the airbus u just arm the toga button on the quadrant the plane does the the rest. So that basically everything behind the departure and why it’s takes the plane so long to take off under normal civil conditions
When I flew for the first time, when I was a kid, it felt super sick accelerating. 11 s is better than expected, because nowadays it just feels normal accelerate for takeoff…
I did the same calculations long back using my phone's GPS, the A320 accelerated with approx 0.25g in my case ( almost the same in this case too). Considering 0.25g acceleration, the overall magnitude of gravity felt in cabin = sqrt(0.25^2 + 1) g = 1.03g, only a 3 % increase in the apparent weight inside the cabin, the majority of acceleration felt is simply due to the change in the direction of the apparent gravity inside cabin. In other words, on can feel the similar acceleration feeling with just tilting the chair they are sitting in. And that's used in simulators too.
idk why - but the acceleration on a airplane feels way more powerful then in a car (ive driven 1000hp cars) yet when i see it needs 10secs from 100-200 it feels slower then thought lol
1. Интересно чем проводился замер? Очень высокое разрешение показателя скорости. 2. Очень странно что подъём передней стойки на скорости более 260, обычно чуть меньше. 3. В конце ролика резкое падение скорости, почему, плохой сигнал? P.S. По личным наблюдениям скорость набора от нуля до 250 кмч примерно 35 сек +-5 зависит от самолета, но на Аирбасах всегда быстрей чем на боенгах.
If I'm honest that was a way slower takeoff to what I'm used to. I notice every time I travel overseas to big cities the take-off experience is way less exciting than at home in New Zealand. Here the literally rev up and dump the clutch🤣
Very interesting. I wonder how much the acceleration increases taking off in -40C. Low temps such as -40C, with all that cold, dense air, sees thrust increases in fighter jet as much as 30%.
Pilots might not be using the full power (TO/GA position at throttle). The FLX position is less powerful than TO/GA so the acceleration is less strong.
Yeah, but the pilots don't push them like they used to years back, i.e. they try to make smooth takeoffs ... which is a bad idea. I want to be pushed hard back in the seat.
Dude calculate yourself. I came to an acceleration of 2,51 ms^-2 which is between 0,3 and 0,4G. Passenger aircraft accelerate quite slow. There are roadcars that reach 100kph faster than passenger aircraft and not to mention that cfm engines are fking hairdryers compared to the bigger Rolls royce and GE engines. Besides. Planes accelerations are dependant on power to weight ratios. If you want fast accelerations, look at fighter jets.
@@hodb3906 I recently had a flight last week on a spirit a320. I remember I was nailed to the seat on takeoff. When I posted this comment I wasn’t too familiar with passengers aircraft g’s, I felt like it was more than 0.3g’s but I know it really was 0.3g. If I thought that takeoff was powerful, I cannot imagine fighter Jets…
Yeah, they usually use FLX to take off to preserve the engine. Only on shorter runways or special conditions they use TOGA. But its like 20% faster so no biggie.
Disclaimer for comments, i don't know what the other 2 instruments are. The units of measurements are ... i use small video and couldn't be bothered to zoom. For gamers only G-force accelerometers and gyroscopes are in most phones and can do inertia measurements without satellites and also without A-GPS. Reference point = (previous)time-state. Most fuel-effective throttle-strategy(engine rotational-speed versus (fuel-consumption)thrust) for a given constant G-force number till V1 without rotate. Then push to max(9x%), hit max rotational-speed, then backdown to 70% neutral-gyroscopic effect for rotate to predetermined (elevator and aileron) pitch angle. Wait one second for float then increase thrust to 80%-90% for float-climb.
After all the previous sharing had been understood, all numbers-control in the bag, for pitch-up kick = spoilers-Up, brakes-On, taxi-cruising thrust for one second (to establish air flow), release brakes, retract spoilers slowly, ... maintain chosen G-force number... After lift-off is other drag reduction (retract of landing gear front while main is anchor-pivot (ram)air-drag redirection to ground, retract main landing gear, ...), build speed to safety margin, build climb-rate while maintaining that speed, hit lower-oxygen-altitude (lower air-drag too), (optional) use engine to compensate, hit another lower-air-drag altitude, build speed - reduce pitch, air-speed "rams" plane upwards... 8000ft, 18000ft, 28000ft - plus-minus compensate for air-drag weather-pattern... Emergency, exchange speed for lift = pitch up Exchange negative climb-rate for speed = pitch-down
When you seat near window the GPS signal gets through. Did it on my flight to Dominican Republic. Saw my plane on Google maps over the Atlantic ocean 🤣
a320 is pretty quiet. you can feel the power difference from flex to TOGO on take off and its pretty cool. a full power take off on a light plane is cool as hell.
most probably it is more capable than 10 seconds but most of the time airlines use deteriorated power not to exhaust engines too much to save their life and noise restrictions
11s 100-200 is alright, that those things weigh around 70t/140000lbs compared to a 1,5t car. And this was probably just a relaxed takeoff, maximum thrust would be a lot quicker. Plus the cruise speed of the A320 is around 800kph/500mph, which is pretty damn fast. Or 2200kph/1350mph if you count the Concorde, which was insane
What a fucking legend. Dragy on a plane. Hilarious!
1219 Like and no replies lemme fix that
This dude really brought a dragy onto an airplane to test the 60-120 😭😭😭😭😭😭
Drip man
And you searched it to watch it 😂🤣😂🤘
@Chozey title says 100-200kmh, 60-120mph
100-200 km/h*
And you watched it 😭
Ah yes. The 2020 tesla aircraft. A true masterpiece.
Tesla and masterpiece in one sentence might be the funniest joke in 2023 already.
@@bastulwhite6842 Technically wasnt in the same sentence, but I agree with ya.
@@bastulwhite6842 haha,good one.
if Nikola Tesla then 100% YES. if elon musk -tesla 🤡🌏🐑🚀🤣
btw. Earth is not a spinning ball 🤣🤣
@@ovic.Exact. Earth has the shape of a coke can.
@@Blubb5000 i dont know shape of the earth, i just know its NOT 🌏
I do not really care about how fast it reaches a speed, I care about the feeling that you have when you get pushed back in the seat. My local airport in Romania (Craiova) only has an 8k feet runway and that feeling is just over the world.
You are from Romania, why do you use the dаmn American units?
@@cheesebusiness because the standard unit in the aviation industry are feet and nautical miles
Runways are measured in meters if you are not in the us
@@cheesebusiness when it comes to aviation, i only speak “miles”. when it comes to day to day life, i speak “kilometers”. i know it’s weird, it may confuse people, i was confused when i started having interest in aviation, but you jet get used to converting.
cea mai tare senzatie pe langa vria in planor 🤙
that's why cars are limited to 250km at 270 they take off
Right! XD
Except they dont
@@dzenan.m they do
@@SenszR I dont see flying cars on german autobahn
@@dzenan.m that’s because they are in the clouds
Уф, разгон как у самолёта. Не просто едет, а летит!)
На таком аппарате, как на крыльях, наверное))
Nice work sir. In reality airliners don't accelerate at max power. In fact they run at the lowest (safe) rate in order to save fuel and reduce fatigue on the engines. Every takeoff power setting is calculated based on runway length and aircraft weight. The thrust setting is derated accordingly.
The quickest jet is probably the 757, high power to weight ratio.
Yes and also the air temperature and the runway altitude
That makes sense, it still feels fast, faster than this, there are modded cars doing it in 6. I’d love to feel a jet at max power, better yet a fighter jet like F22 or F18
Aircraft carrier catapult launch… 😉
@@spaRTan3246 that would really be interesting
Fuel lol
Cmon Civic show me your power
Yesterday we decided to took off with Toga due to increase in tailwind in the last moment. A320neo. Crazy the pulling power. Reached Vr like in no time
Every time we do that, every time we got excited! Especially on low TOW sectors😱 Massive!
It’s so fun
Feels good being able to say I can beat a plane 60-130 😂
That will have been derated like probably only 70% throttle and when it started around the 100kph speed it was clearly less. They do this for engine life and fuel consumption. So in reality if this was nearly empty and at full throttle it would be much much quicker. It's like putting 5 people and luggage in a golf r and only using part throttle or the midrange and then saying an ibiza cupra will beat it. I don't know what car you have so you may still beat it when it's 100% throttle and empty but you get my point
They always use full throttle on takeoff..
@@Pilot_graaape_45 no they dont
@Robert Owen my car runs 9’s 60-130
So first on the a320 u mostly use flex temperature which gets calculated based on the aircraft loading but also weather condition aswell as if u use packs and or anti ice on departure. There are some techniques mainly used on smaller airports like saba for example where u hold the brake till the engines spooled up in order to take off faster. The procedure on the a320 is that u put the throttle to 50N1 and wait for the engines to spool up and be stable this take 5 to 10 seconds as u can also see in the beginning after that the pilots set the thrust to the desired settings. The a320 got Detens on the throttle quadrant they either use flex or toga after take off the pilots hold a 12.5 to 20 degree angle and hold their v2 speed after around 1200 feet they reach the thr reduction alltitute where they put the trust into the climb position and also accelerate and also put the flaps up. Beneath 10000ft the plane isn’t allowed to go faster then 250knts. For the Boeing it’s kinda the same instead of 50 u use 40 n1 and different to the airbus u just arm the toga button on the quadrant the plane does the the rest. So that basically everything behind the departure and why it’s takes the plane so long to take off under normal civil conditions
This man really draggied an AirBus A320 😭 what a fucking legend you are!
A use of draggy I never thought I'd be but this is so cool🤣 need more of this please with different aircraft
When I flew for the first time, when I was a kid, it felt super sick accelerating. 11 s is better than expected, because nowadays it just feels normal accelerate for takeoff…
They'll take off on Flex thrust to save fuel if the runway is long enough, so sometimes you'll feel more or less acceleration
@@markmcculfor6113 didn’t know. Thanks for explaining.
I felt/feal the same :D
Давно хотел узнать разгон лайнера)
Если бы пилот знал что идет замер, результат был бы гораздо лучше😁
@@daredevil1233 ага, с двух педалей бы бахнул)))
Лайнеры взлетают как правило на потребном режиме, все зависит от загрузки и заправки. Так что не факт что тут даже больше 70% мощности было)
Bro 😂😂 dragy in a plane? Now test 300-400
Yeah
535d stage 1 probably do better 😁
But can it fly? 😂
@@redbull4fly797 flight is stupid anyway
What about Vmax 880 kmh GPS?
I did the same calculations long back using my phone's GPS, the A320 accelerated with approx 0.25g in my case ( almost the same in this case too).
Considering 0.25g acceleration, the overall magnitude of gravity felt in cabin = sqrt(0.25^2 + 1) g = 1.03g, only a 3 % increase in the apparent weight inside the cabin, the majority of acceleration felt is simply due to the change in the direction of the apparent gravity inside cabin. In other words, on can feel the similar acceleration feeling with just tilting the chair they are sitting in. And that's used in simulators too.
idk why - but the acceleration on a airplane feels way more powerful then in a car (ive driven 1000hp cars)
yet when i see it needs 10secs from 100-200 it feels slower then thought lol
Maybe because of the size
What's the 60ft times like?
how fast can you run down the isle with fasten seatbelt signs illuminated? that fast
@@samuelmurphy8692 That's at least a 10, maybe 9 second pass.
@@HHCHunterYTC Haha! I say that because they don't exactly launch the plane, although they should!
Моя девяточка на настроенных карбах от Петровича быстрей разгоняется . Всё , пора просыпаться …
You’re a legend for doing this.
has anyone ever think about get a draggy on a f18 launching from carrier?
Rafale on the french carrier would be even crazier because they have a shorter catapult.
They launch with 4-5Gs if I remember correctly
1. Интересно чем проводился замер? Очень высокое разрешение показателя скорости.
2. Очень странно что подъём передней стойки на скорости более 260, обычно чуть меньше.
3. В конце ролика резкое падение скорости, почему, плохой сигнал?
P.S. По личным наблюдениям скорость набора от нуля до 250 кмч примерно 35 сек +-5 зависит от самолета, но на Аирбасах всегда быстрей чем на боенгах.
how does it perform with the moose test?
Excellent. The wings were made just for that😂
Из 11 вышел норм !
I'm surprised the cabin crew didn't run in screaming saying that your electronic device would make the plane explode
Вот что что, а аирбас на драги точно ещё не замеряли
If I'm honest that was a way slower takeoff to what I'm used to. I notice every time I travel overseas to big cities the take-off experience is way less exciting than at home in New Zealand. Here the literally rev up and dump the clutch🤣
Because of shorter runways in NZ? Not sure
Launch control? 😂
Can you test the Plaid aircraft?
Not a proper review without a look at the trunk space
Very interesting. I wonder how much the acceleration increases taking off in -40C. Low temps such as -40C, with all that cold, dense air, sees thrust increases in fighter jet as much as 30%.
But also has more air resistance
I loved this. When you see them take off it they don’t seem to be goi g as fast as they actually are
Pilots might not be using the full power (TO/GA position at throttle). The FLX position is less powerful than TO/GA so the acceleration is less strong.
Bro this is the funniest video I've seen on youtube 😂😂😂
I love this. Legend
why is the audio slowed down here
I think the G readout removed the Z axis. The lift-off put way more G than that.
Tnx mate. Now i know everything i wanted to know :) Have a nice day!
I have been goog;ling this, never found it, thanks!
Problem is aircraft usually don‘t take off with full thrust
The g forces should be way more than 0.3g’s. The power of those cfm engines are no joke.
Yeah, but the pilots don't push them like they used to years back, i.e. they try to make smooth takeoffs ... which is a bad idea. I want to be pushed hard back in the seat.
All about fuel thsse days
@@legioner9 get your facts right bro
Dude calculate yourself. I came to an acceleration of 2,51 ms^-2 which is between 0,3 and 0,4G.
Passenger aircraft accelerate quite slow. There are roadcars that reach 100kph faster than passenger aircraft and not to mention that cfm engines are fking hairdryers compared to the bigger Rolls royce and GE engines. Besides. Planes accelerations are dependant on power to weight ratios. If you want fast accelerations, look at fighter jets.
@@hodb3906 I recently had a flight last week on a spirit a320. I remember I was nailed to the seat on takeoff. When I posted this comment I wasn’t too familiar with passengers aircraft g’s, I felt like it was more than 0.3g’s but I know it really was 0.3g. If I thought that takeoff was powerful, I cannot imagine fighter Jets…
Launch control?
No bro ) Whith Launch control faster!
That was probraly FLEX MCT takeoff not TOGA, so it wasn't full power.
I’ll guarantee you that wasn’t anything close to a full-power departure.
Yeah, they usually use FLX to take off to preserve the engine. Only on shorter runways or special conditions they use TOGA. But its like 20% faster so no biggie.
Disclaimer for comments, i don't know what the other 2 instruments are. The units of measurements are ... i use small video and couldn't be bothered to zoom.
For gamers only
G-force accelerometers and gyroscopes are in most phones and can do inertia measurements without satellites and also without A-GPS. Reference point = (previous)time-state.
Most fuel-effective throttle-strategy(engine rotational-speed versus (fuel-consumption)thrust) for a given constant G-force number till V1 without rotate. Then push to max(9x%), hit max rotational-speed, then backdown to 70% neutral-gyroscopic effect for rotate to predetermined (elevator and aileron) pitch angle. Wait one second for float then increase thrust to 80%-90% for float-climb.
After all the previous sharing had been understood, all numbers-control in the bag, for pitch-up kick = spoilers-Up, brakes-On, taxi-cruising thrust for one second (to establish air flow), release brakes, retract spoilers slowly, ... maintain chosen G-force number...
After lift-off is other drag reduction (retract of landing gear front while main is anchor-pivot (ram)air-drag redirection to ground, retract main landing gear, ...), build speed to safety margin, build climb-rate while maintaining that speed, hit lower-oxygen-altitude (lower air-drag too), (optional) use engine to compensate, hit another lower-air-drag altitude, build speed - reduce pitch, air-speed "rams" plane upwards...
8000ft, 18000ft, 28000ft - plus-minus compensate for air-drag weather-pattern...
Emergency,
exchange speed for lift = pitch up
Exchange negative climb-rate for speed = pitch-down
I needed to see this.
Привет из чатика)
What is the name of that program?
Dont forget, about 70 tonnes weight on this speed..
Nice move, bro :D
Are we supposed to know what Dragy is?
Now do a 400-500
faster than my bugatti, Respect!👍(matchbox btw)
Аай... Я думал еще 200-300 будет)
Next time do f18 carrier launch
Where did you put the draggy. I tried this but it didn't get any satellite signal
When you seat near window the GPS signal gets through. Did it on my flight to Dominican Republic. Saw my plane on Google maps over the Atlantic ocean 🤣
I would love the same video with the dragy speed audio call outs
Wow! That thing flies!
Legend!
This is Eco mode (75% torque)! No Launch control!
whatn that turbo htis
'mY tEsLa pLAid iS fasTeR'
'mY cIVic gApS'
'mY 9999999999999 HP tRuCk doEs iT in 0.000000001 SEcOnds'
'mY aUdi CAn bEAt ThAt'
Bro some planes are actually underated when it comes to acceleration
Я мерил тоже в Сочи, из десяти боинг рванул🥸
That didn’t even sound like full throttle lol
they're super quiet airplanes!! was on one today
a320 is pretty quiet. you can feel the power difference from flex to TOGO on take off and its pretty cool. a full power take off on a light plane is cool as hell.
Yes, 90% of the time planes don't take off with full throttle because it's usually not needed
@@GoofyHD3 also engine is most likey to get damage on TOGA so they keep it between 80-85%
True they never go full throttle. (Or very rarely atleast)
Goes the same like mine 535d daily. Nice
most probably it is more capable than 10 seconds but most of the time airlines use deteriorated power not to exhaust engines too much to save their life and noise restrictions
They take off with minimal thrust for safety
how is 60 mph 100 kmh?
Спасибо, орнул в голосину!
Рухнул что ли? с 270 сразу 220?
LOL...............Absolutely hilarious, think a bigger turbo and winding the boost up is needed here 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That means it has a power of ca. 110 000 hp
Its like my car 100-200 11s.
those numbers would be half if the pilots used toga instead of flex/derate😂
dedication !
1000 km/h Airbus Please! 🙏
Chiron supersport does it in 3.4 seconds !
Lmao, same exact time as my stock '20 m340i xdrive sedan. Fun to know.
Whats your Vmax? :D
@@ioannischa1637
Around 240 km/h when free-falling at terminal velocity.
now put 200 souls onboard and try again L)
@@no.thanks278
Good point lmao.
My tuned Volvo beats it by a second
Planes are actually quite fast arent they?
11s 100-200 is alright, that those things weigh around 70t/140000lbs compared to a 1,5t car. And this was probably just a relaxed takeoff, maximum thrust would be a lot quicker. Plus the cruise speed of the A320 is around 800kph/500mph, which is pretty damn fast. Or 2200kph/1350mph if you count the Concorde, which was insane
@@starstencahl8985 Always surprises me because of how much they weigh and how big they are but then they do have a huge amount of power
@@marktucker208 Yeah it’s impressive
@@starstencahl8985 Concorde cruising speed was basically the same as an AK47 bullet leaving the barrel.
Теперь можно фразу "низенько полетел" в отношении мчащихся легковых авто под 250км по трассе воспринимать как факт, а не стёб-подъёб
I also did a A320 60-130 mph 13.45 sec
SOCHI 😊
Yes my Car has a better time 😆
What's the quarter mile? 😂
Ah yes this must be the Tesla Roadster with the space x package… 🤣🤷🏽♂️
I’d estimate the 0-60 to be ~8 seconds
Who is also looking for that one honda owner
Always thought it's quicker... that's bmw m2 competition level
about the same as a lambo or a tuned bmw M5
That's Audi RS6 territory
Plane start to fly at 260 km/h
Measure this again in the empty aircraft, on TOGA power. :)
Do this for every plane lol
Up tsi benga fácil
My golf mk 5 tdi 2.0 have 100 to 200 kmh for 9.1 sec 😂
Не едет)))))
Ну как сказать, 100-200 вполне норм :)
Это не истребитель с тяговооруженностью под полторы единицы)
Ну он как бы в эко режиме взлетал !
👍
PD megeszi