AMD RX 8000 - Slower GDDR6 Memory?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
  • As AMD prepares the Radeon RX 8000 lineup, rumors point to using GDDR6 memory across the board, bypassing the newer and faster GDDR7 or GDDR6W standards, defying expectations of impressive memory tech adoption to boost performance. This video explored whether this strategic choice benefits Radeon RX 8000 gamers and enthusiasts by impacting next-gen GPU performance.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Video Sources: ‪@AMD‬ ‪@NVIDIA‬
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To collaborate: kontentmafiaus@gmail.com
    Website: www.kontentmaf...
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Disclaimer: We have used video footage and images to maximize the clarity of the content, not specifically to promote any violence that goes against the community. This content only intends to share information for educational purposes.
    ***Footage, music, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners, and we or this channel do not claim any rights over them. This video has been produced following the Fair Usage Policy “Under Section 107” of the “Copyright Act 1976”. If you have any copyright issues, please contact us by email.
    ***Some of our content may contain affiliate links, from which we earn a commission that helps us run this channel.
    #amd #amdryzen #amdrx8000

Комментарии • 11

  • @thomasfischer9259
    @thomasfischer9259 3 месяца назад

    It's like everyone forgot about Infinity Cache already

  • @allxtend4005
    @allxtend4005 3 месяца назад +1

    gddr6 is more then enough we all saw how HBM2 did and it was too expensive and it was way faster then DDR7 and still cant be used, if a GPU has GDDR6 and use it good enough then it can beat easy a GPU with GDDR7 that will cost more because of the name and the components and at the end we all know how Nvidia do not put enough Ram on ther GPU's so it will not matter if GDDR7 / 8 or 10 if there's not enough of it.

  • @wezleyjackson9918
    @wezleyjackson9918 3 месяца назад +2

    Using DDR6+ for RDNA 4 would be a smart move - If they use Samsung DDR6 24GB/s on the higher-mid range part (to keep costs down) and can match the 4080 or 4080 super (in raster perf.) and their Ray Tracing performance gets on-par or close, they will have a huge success! Its a smaller number of people that can afford a 4090 (or 5090),...

    • @Integroabysal
      @Integroabysal 3 месяца назад +2

      Ray Tracing will never be the same as Nvidia unless AMD cuts down the quality of RT just like Nvidia does , i was watching a video comparison of 4070 vs 7800xt and when the author split the screen in cyberpunk , the AMD card had more detailed reflections than Nvidia , that's why Nvidia is king at RT they choose to lower the quality in some cases so they can pull out on top. Just like they were doing with 900 series

  • @patrickweaver1105
    @patrickweaver1105 3 месяца назад +4

    Memory speed isn't the bottleneck. It's thermals. Always thermals. Cpu, Gpu, even chipsets.

  • @Arowx
    @Arowx 3 месяца назад +2

    What if they added more on chip cache to boost the bandwidth without needing higher speed memory?

  • @shaneholly11
    @shaneholly11 3 месяца назад

    All right this is what I want out of our amd rdna 4 graphics cards. is the rx 9600 be to be small like say one to one and a half slot. But have all the advantages of rdna 4. Now making all the other cards full size and is powerful as they can be i'm good with that too. Just like soon I will be able to have a laptop that doesn't require a dedicated GPU and still be able to game when I'm on the move or working effectively. To get the performance of a rX 6400 out of the laptop igpu that's awesome.

  • @FireCestina1200
    @FireCestina1200 3 месяца назад

    GDDR7 is like Gen 5 Nvme.
    Desoite having better specs. No performance increase in 99,99% application. No load time reduced in game. No download speed increased (because even if you have a 10Gbits/s internet it's equal to 1,25GBYTES/s) so knowing gen 4 have ±7GB in write. It's useless. And we're not gonna lie. More data transferred is useless if it was already not bottlenecked by GDDR6 memory. What I would like to see. Is high bus speed. High bus speed equal better performance. Cuz higher bus speed higher overclocking support. That's why the 2080 if I'm not wrong. Was an absolute unit with his 512 bus speed.

  • @DizConnected
    @DizConnected 3 месяца назад

    GDDR7 memory uses around 20 percent less power than GDDR6, which is an instant energy efficiency saving. Second, GDDR7 uses a lower operating voltage of 1.20 volts for the core and I/O compared to the 1.35 volts typically used in GDDR6 and GDDR6X