pitch effect comparison • SP202 vs. SP404mk2 • phdirac

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 10

  • @eddieleonard6925
    @eddieleonard6925 Год назад +4

    This was a very useful side-by-side comparison. I can't put my finger on why, but the 202 draws me in, every time. I know it has less range, but within the range it does have, the 202 handles aliasing better. It's more pleasing to my ear. The 404 is a better and more functional machine overall, but the 202 has a character that's difficult to replicate. It's also less "jumpy" when turning to dial in a pitch. The only interesting thing i noticed on the 404 is when you pitched it all the way up, the drums REALLY snapped. Makes me think that the SP's could be useful as a drum sampler too..using the old sample at 45rpm and pitch down to 33. Or vice versa...in any case, having both of these is a big plus for your studio and workflow. Thanks for taking the time to put this together. 👊👊👊

    • @phdirac
      @phdirac  Год назад

      @@totallyawsomedude1032 I’ve heard a lot of good things about that sampler

    • @phdirac
      @phdirac  Год назад +1

      @eddieleonard6925 bro thanks for this detailed review on the sampler effect! Yeah, the 202’s sound is so warm and has a great texture to it. Regarding the jumpiness on the 404 pitch, that can be reduced by holding “shift” while moving the control dial; it’s a good coarse-fine adjustment function on the effect. I’m gonna keep experimenting with this workflow/setup in order to leverage the best aspects of each sampler.

  • @Killestt
    @Killestt Год назад +6

    202 takes the money for me

  • @BoombapBodega
    @BoombapBodega Год назад +2

    Dope vibes! These 2 samplers together are sick! 🔥🥁

  • @CNTRRNDM
    @CNTRRNDM Год назад +2

    Really enjoyed this one! And dude...I love the snare!!!

  • @wiggesobk
    @wiggesobk Год назад +1

    Nice comparison.

    • @phdirac
      @phdirac  Год назад

      Thank you!! 🙏🏿