With Gremlins, I always assumed it was an internal clock with them. Midnight is 12 am wherever they are, and it ends when the sun comes up. Seems pretty straightforward.
I thought the Terminator segment was about "how come you can send an endoskeleton inside a living tissue body, but a weapon", particularly because that paradox is brought out in the movie itself (I very much like when filmmakers do that - don't ask, just play along!)
I want to say that NOT minding their surrounding is what got them killed in Batman Begins, but I would assume that is debatable. Also, does Ra's Al Ghul give any reason for anyone to save him?
actually the original script for the first Terminator came up with 'there is no fate but what we make'. Sarah already wanted to destroy Cyberdyne in 1984 but the subplot was cut
Cap's shield and Pym particles are convoluted in the comics as well - specially the Pym particles for the reasons explained here - so we can't really blame the movies for it as it would lose the 'magic' if they try to make them more grounded. The shield cutting through things is not so bad though if memory serves. The wall it gets through its supposed to be like US walls (not made of bricks) and the aliens can be argued he cut off the weapons in exposed parts of their armor. Whereas not cutting people in half I seem to remember they were wearing body armor? 🤔 They should have had several internal injuries though if it were real...
Sausage Party. Sometimes it's the food itself that is alive like the sausages and carrots inside the pack, other time it's the packaging that's alive like how there's a packet of crisps where the packet is alive and not the crisps inside the packet. Plus they have non food items like toilet paper and a douche that are alive. The whole film feels like they thought it would be funny to have food come alive and swear and put no effort into establishing any actual rules or logic within the film
@@wallythewondercorncake8657 Though shooting him when he goes giant, wouldn't that just be more like hitting him with tiny BBs? It wouldn't have the same effect as when he's normal size.
@@ApohMay By the unchanging mass rule he'd be far less dense at a larger size, so any projectile could very easily pierce right through him. How many through and through wounds to the torso with sewing needles could the average human survive?
Wreck-It Ralph is a big problem then Cars. In Wreck-It Ralph it's all about not going Turbo, and game jump but in Wreck-It Ralph Breaks the internet Vanellope essential go Turbo
Also, that essentially renders the blooming steering wheel that they spent the whole movie trying to acquire pointless, because who's going to want to play Sugar Rush when the main character is gone? They even have one of the players saying that they love Vanellope at the start of the film. It's almost as baffling a mistake as Buzz Lightyear freezing around humans even though he doesn't think he's a toy in the first Toy Story movie.
On the Ant-Man one, I remember a video of an astronaut on the ISS getting hit in the head and explaining that while in space, the can has no weight, it still retains its mass. I assume the Pym Particles work the same way. Weight can change relative to the forces acting on it (gravity, acceleration, etc.) but mass is constant because it's a measure of how much substance an object is made of.
I'm not sure what you think that would change. If anything, the miniaturized version of the same mass on the same surface somewhere on earth would be ever so slightly heavier since shrinking would bring the center of mass of the object closer to the center of gravity of the Earth
Jules, thank you for your explanation at the beginning! There are far too many people on this platform that think because something is criticized or isn't " perfect" then it is a failure or it is wrong or it is bad and that is not the case. There is no such thing as a perfect movie, mistakes are always made, that doesn't mean a movie is a failure or bad and I appreciate you for stating that up front. Keep being awesome! 😁
There is a big difference between a small continuity error in filming and a script where the writer could not keep track of the rules for the fictional universe they themselves made up.
How long does it take for the Xenomorphs to incubate inside humans in the Alien franchise...? Okay, the worst offenders have been in the Alien vs Predator spin-offs, I think, but the main franchise hasn't stayed stay all that consistent either.
8:36 well to be fair the emperor was in legends was able to come back via his force spirit entering a clone body of his tho they aged and weathered fast . I agree that Disney did the emperor dirty
You mean like how Han Solo in Star Wars Episode IV clearly states to Luke, that the Millennium Falcon is the fastest ship in the galaxy with its .5 above lightspeed (1.5 times the speed of light) and all of a sudden from every single movie after that, it can go faster and faster and even faster, as if it just happens to have the required speed needed for the individual situations in the movies?
In the case of Pym Particles, it's easily explained by allowing control over size and mass both allowing the mixing and matching of the two. While demonstrated as such on screen, it's never explained.
for ant man, all they had to do was say that the suit could maintain the mass when applied as a force, meaning he could punch, but then everything else would be as light or heavy as its size.
Ant Man: Or how about casually toting around a full office building like a rolling suitcase? Star Wars: It's not the first time the Emperor has made a comeback, though that's now been relegated to the trash bin of non-canon when Darth Disney assumed control. There was a story in the extended universe novels (at one point approved by Lucas, mind you!) where Luke encountered a facility chock full of Emperor clones that could be possessed in case of death or serious injury.
Terminator's issue was that it caved to a certain demographic. It was on a clear path that nothing they did was going to stop the war from happening. Part one ended they thought they stopped the plan only for part 2 to come in and show that it was still going to happen but just a slightly different way. And part 3 finished it off with the fact that nothing they did was able to stop it. A logical conclusion if you don't try and jump into multiverses as it's a paradox. If you stop the event from happening that sent you to the past, you won't have a reason to go back in time, which means you won't go back in time to stop the event anymore. and round and round. Captain America is explained and then dismissed. He knows how much force he needs to use. Even a blunt object can cut through something with enough force. It's obvious that is what he is doing because you see it in all of his fights. He fought aliens and got a few good hits on Thanos. Do you think the average person would be able to take the same power from a punch that would effect the mad titan. Even in his fight with Ironman. Forget his shield, he is strong enough to kill people with just a punch, he chooses not to.
The original Terminator had time turn out to be completely immutable. Any attempt to change the future turned out to just be part of the conditions that always led to the exact same future. By 3 the writers shifted heavily to the idea that one could alter details of the future, but some things were just inevitable results of human nature and would eventually happen no matter how much the details were changed. Your Captain America explanation ignored physics. Force = Mass x Acceleration. The mass of the shield remains constant, yet somehow it sometimes gets more acceleration applied to it and still hits with less force.
One rule I always notice is how the hero can accelerate to safely catch the falling person.
I have the strangest feeling of dejavu ...
Me too
Me too@@InDeathWeReturn
You said that earlier...
... all over again.
Again?
With Gremlins, I always assumed it was an internal clock with them. Midnight is 12 am wherever they are, and it ends when the sun comes up. Seems pretty straightforward.
Except as much as that makes sense, it’s still head canon. So it’s not straightforward.
I thought the Terminator segment was about "how come you can send an endoskeleton inside a living tissue body, but a weapon", particularly because that paradox is brought out in the movie itself (I very much like when filmmakers do that - don't ask, just play along!)
Batman is tolerated not accepted,he's not a hero,he's fringe operating on the edge of the law
I want to say that NOT minding their surrounding is what got them killed in Batman Begins, but I would assume that is debatable. Also, does Ra's Al Ghul give any reason for anyone to save him?
@jamesmendonca2900 when he set the fire, he was not yet Batman and thus had not made the oath to not kill.
actually the original script for the first Terminator came up with 'there is no fate but what we make'. Sarah already wanted to destroy Cyberdyne in 1984 but the subplot was cut
Cap's shield and Pym particles are convoluted in the comics as well - specially the Pym particles for the reasons explained here - so we can't really blame the movies for it as it would lose the 'magic' if they try to make them more grounded.
The shield cutting through things is not so bad though if memory serves. The wall it gets through its supposed to be like US walls (not made of bricks) and the aliens can be argued he cut off the weapons in exposed parts of their armor. Whereas not cutting people in half I seem to remember they were wearing body armor? 🤔 They should have had several internal injuries though if it were real...
In 'Highlander' there can be only one.... unless you want to make sequels
Sausage Party. Sometimes it's the food itself that is alive like the sausages and carrots inside the pack, other time it's the packaging that's alive like how there's a packet of crisps where the packet is alive and not the crisps inside the packet. Plus they have non food items like toilet paper and a douche that are alive. The whole film feels like they thought it would be funny to have food come alive and swear and put no effort into establishing any actual rules or logic within the film
Its so hard to watch too no matter how many edibles you eat lol
I've always wondered what Ant Man's suit is made from. Surely when he goes giant you could just shoot him or something?
@@wallythewondercorncake8657 Though shooting him when he goes giant, wouldn't that just be more like hitting him with tiny BBs? It wouldn't have the same effect as when he's normal size.
@@ApohMay Well there's plenty of big guns, plus when he shrinks back down, wouldn't the holes remain the same size?
@@ApohMay By the unchanging mass rule he'd be far less dense at a larger size, so any projectile could very easily pierce right through him. How many through and through wounds to the torso with sewing needles could the average human survive?
What do you mean? There was only 2 Terminator movies. They wouldn't come out with soulless sequels after the perfection that was T2
T3 is a much better movie than most give it credit for. Ending was fantastic.
@@garrym5682 The franchise should have ended at 2
It was a good thing they stopped at one with The Matrix as well.
Dom has superpowers
I gave your mom a "soggy send-off" last night! THAT'S MY ONE PER LIST! remember when Jules use to do that? Good times.
Cap's shield is way more consistent than Ant-Man's nonsense
Man, you added that really quickly!
Bale’s Batman killed double digits.
Wreck-It Ralph is a big problem then Cars. In Wreck-It Ralph it's all about not going Turbo, and game jump but in Wreck-It Ralph Breaks the internet Vanellope essential go Turbo
Also, that essentially renders the blooming steering wheel that they spent the whole movie trying to acquire pointless, because who's going to want to play Sugar Rush when the main character is gone? They even have one of the players saying that they love Vanellope at the start of the film. It's almost as baffling a mistake as Buzz Lightyear freezing around humans even though he doesn't think he's a toy in the first Toy Story movie.
What's with the music in this video? I felt like I was in the salon and was listing to some guy ranting about movie plot holes.
Jules is the best.
On the Ant-Man one, I remember a video of an astronaut on the ISS getting hit in the head and explaining that while in space, the can has no weight, it still retains its mass. I assume the Pym Particles work the same way.
Weight can change relative to the forces acting on it (gravity, acceleration, etc.) but mass is constant because it's a measure of how much substance an object is made of.
I'm not sure what you think that would change. If anything, the miniaturized version of the same mass on the same surface somewhere on earth would be ever so slightly heavier since shrinking would bring the center of mass of the object closer to the center of gravity of the Earth
Jules, thank you for your explanation at the beginning! There are far too many people on this platform that think because something is criticized or isn't " perfect" then it is a failure or it is wrong or it is bad and that is not the case. There is no such thing as a perfect movie, mistakes are always made, that doesn't mean a movie is a failure or bad and I appreciate you for stating that up front. Keep being awesome! 😁
There is a big difference between a small continuity error in filming and a script where the writer could not keep track of the rules for the fictional universe they themselves made up.
How long does it take for the Xenomorphs to incubate inside humans in the Alien franchise...? Okay, the worst offenders have been in the Alien vs Predator spin-offs, I think, but the main franchise hasn't stayed stay all that consistent either.
Good question especially after alien romulas it seems to be even shorter
8:36 well to be fair the emperor was in legends was able to come back via his force spirit entering a clone body of his tho they aged and weathered fast . I agree that Disney did the emperor dirty
Unusual for Jules to equivocate a list before it begins.
Oh, it mentions Star Wars.
You mean like how Han Solo in Star Wars Episode IV clearly states to Luke, that the Millennium Falcon is the fastest ship in the galaxy with its .5 above lightspeed (1.5 times the speed of light) and all of a sudden from every single movie after that, it can go faster and faster and even faster, as if it just happens to have the required speed needed for the individual situations in the movies?
I thought you guys knew: _Cars_ has a prequel that explains who built the cars.
It's called _Maximum Overdrive._
I'm of the opinion that there's actually only 2 Terminator movies. Everything after Judgement Day is just really really expensive fan fiction.
Love your content! Thanks For this ❤❤❤
In the case of Pym Particles, it's easily explained by allowing control over size and mass both allowing the mixing and matching of the two. While demonstrated as such on screen, it's never explained.
for ant man, all they had to do was say that the suit could maintain the mass when applied as a force, meaning he could punch, but then everything else would be as light or heavy as its size.
Kind of like the chill vibes music going in the background 🎵
There's only two Terminator movies. There's only 3 Indiana Jones movies. There's only 3 Die Hard movies.
Not Jules getting folks right together before the video 🤭🤭🤭 he is sick of y’all being too nit picky over these lists 😂😂😂
Ant Man: Or how about casually toting around a full office building like a rolling suitcase?
Star Wars: It's not the first time the Emperor has made a comeback, though that's now been relegated to the trash bin of non-canon when Darth Disney assumed control. There was a story in the extended universe novels (at one point approved by Lucas, mind you!) where Luke encountered a facility chock full of Emperor clones that could be possessed in case of death or serious injury.
Terminator's issue was that it caved to a certain demographic. It was on a clear path that nothing they did was going to stop the war from happening. Part one ended they thought they stopped the plan only for part 2 to come in and show that it was still going to happen but just a slightly different way. And part 3 finished it off with the fact that nothing they did was able to stop it. A logical conclusion if you don't try and jump into multiverses as it's a paradox. If you stop the event from happening that sent you to the past, you won't have a reason to go back in time, which means you won't go back in time to stop the event anymore. and round and round.
Captain America is explained and then dismissed. He knows how much force he needs to use. Even a blunt object can cut through something with enough force. It's obvious that is what he is doing because you see it in all of his fights. He fought aliens and got a few good hits on Thanos. Do you think the average person would be able to take the same power from a punch that would effect the mad titan. Even in his fight with Ironman. Forget his shield, he is strong enough to kill people with just a punch, he chooses not to.
The original Terminator had time turn out to be completely immutable. Any attempt to change the future turned out to just be part of the conditions that always led to the exact same future. By 3 the writers shifted heavily to the idea that one could alter details of the future, but some things were just inevitable results of human nature and would eventually happen no matter how much the details were changed.
Your Captain America explanation ignored physics. Force = Mass x Acceleration. The mass of the shield remains constant, yet somehow it sometimes gets more acceleration applied to it and still hits with less force.
Terminator Jai-Nai-Sais 😂🤣😆
Oh man 🤦♀️ this was not great
Forrest Gump is a complete rip off of Little Big Man
Who the feck is Raysh Al Ghul? 🤦🏻
They really should have named that Terminator film "geni.sys" instead.