Ugh, I still can't forgive him for adding that "No!" to the scene when Vader suplexes the Emperor. The music is building, the mask is looking back and forth between the emperor and Luke, and then when he makes his choice, the music goes HARD. It gives me goosebumps every time. But when I heard that "NO" just crammed in there for the first time, ugh.
@@seanbordenkircher7854 that was actually my biggest issue with the rereleases too, the body language of a masked character in Star Wars shouldn’t be underestimated again and I think in some moments in the mandalorian they showed that very well again
You know, the cuts to the dog movie would seem over the top until you remember that actual teenagers violated one of the first rules kids are taught and laid down in the middle of the street in traffic because of something they saw in a movie, even thought I'm sure they were taught not to play in traffic from a little kid on up.
Um.. I live down under and I clearly remember watching The Program road scene on a rental copy from Blockbuster. I don't understand how I was able to watch it on VHS if it was removed from all cuts of the film? I think you got your facts wrong.
@Frawriest Indeed it does, all of which were released years later, long after the theatrical release was on home video. Which is very different from all of the examples on this list, which had scenes edited between theaters and home video, or while the film was still being shown in theaters. Or a minor trim to a newly-released streaming film like Bird Box, which is also vastly different from the situation with Blade Runner.
@Frawriest If you choose to interpret the topic as "any film to have more than one cut ever" then sure. But that isn't what this video is about, and a topic that broad would be pointless. It is entirely about films which were edited between theaters and home video, or edited while still in theaters. Or the one streaming example.
Maybe it just sprang to mind because it's Halloween but I'll answer 4:05 with RHPS. Go to a production with a shadow-cast if you have the chance. I'm suggesting this since there's a real chance they'll all retire permanently within our lifetimes. And I, for one, would say that that's okay. The movie is okay. It's okay that it had its day. It's okay if its day is coming to an end.
We hated The Shining when it came out because it had so little in common with King's novel. I still hate it because the only sympathetic character is Hallorann. Nicholson's Jack Torrance is a nasty, sarcastic smart arse from the beginning, and Wendy is a weak woman.
I believe the flashback scene is when he's getting Calvin to sign Hilde's freedom papers. Schultz keeps seeing the dog attack while Calvin is eating cake and he makes the harp player stop.
If you ever get a chance to see Lawrence of Arabia in 70mm (or 4k now) on the big screen, its freaking amazing.
Even though I owned it and saw it countless times at home, I actually jumped a few times when I saw "Alien" on the big screen several years back.
Gilliam also bought full page ads telling people Not to see Brazil, after the Sheinberg cut
Surprised George Lucas' changes to the original star wars trilogy weren't here.
There’s enough lists about them 😂
@jordault3321 I can't argue with that. They just stood out to me because they kind of leap out of the screen.
Ugh, I still can't forgive him for adding that "No!" to the scene when Vader suplexes the Emperor. The music is building, the mask is looking back and forth between the emperor and Luke, and then when he makes his choice, the music goes HARD. It gives me goosebumps every time. But when I heard that "NO" just crammed in there for the first time, ugh.
@@seanbordenkircher7854 that was actually my biggest issue with the rereleases too, the body language of a masked character in Star Wars shouldn’t be underestimated again and I think in some moments in the mandalorian they showed that very well again
@@jordault3321 the first season, anyway
Hard Boiled by John Woo. It's incredible on a screen.
I remember watching that scene from the program. I didn't know where that scene came from.
If you can see 2001 in CinemaScope, it is amazing. The ultrawide aspect ratio really hits home.
Heaven’s Gate seen as a masterpiece? Where?
You know, the cuts to the dog movie would seem over the top until you remember that actual teenagers violated one of the first rules kids are taught and laid down in the middle of the street in traffic because of something they saw in a movie, even thought I'm sure they were taught not to play in traffic from a little kid on up.
Um.. I live down under and I clearly remember watching The Program road scene on a rental copy from Blockbuster. I don't understand how I was able to watch it on VHS if it was removed from all cuts of the film? I think you got your facts wrong.
Blade Runner?
If you mean the studio cut with the narration, that was done before the film ever saw wide release.
@@JayStrang1Blade Runner has 5 different versions. Theatrical, directors, final cut, and a few mid-iterations
@Frawriest Indeed it does, all of which were released years later, long after the theatrical release was on home video.
Which is very different from all of the examples on this list, which had scenes edited between theaters and home video, or while the film was still being shown in theaters. Or a minor trim to a newly-released streaming film like Bird Box, which is also vastly different from the situation with Blade Runner.
@JayStrang1 which is the topic right? Movies edited after release?
@Frawriest If you choose to interpret the topic as "any film to have more than one cut ever" then sure. But that isn't what this video is about, and a topic that broad would be pointless. It is entirely about films which were edited between theaters and home video, or edited while still in theaters. Or the one streaming example.
Maybe it just sprang to mind because it's Halloween but I'll answer 4:05 with RHPS.
Go to a production with a shadow-cast if you have the chance.
I'm suggesting this since there's a real chance they'll all retire permanently within our lifetimes.
And I, for one, would say that that's okay.
The movie is okay. It's okay that it had its day. It's okay if its day is coming to an end.
We hated The Shining when it came out because it had so little in common with King's novel. I still hate it because the only sympathetic character is Hallorann. Nicholson's Jack Torrance is a nasty, sarcastic smart arse from the beginning, and Wendy is a weak woman.
the cut of Brazil i own, is 136mins, with the dismal ending
Interesting
I’d have cut the beginning,middle and ending of the shining 😂
But I enjoyed this watched it twice
That scene wasn't Schultz' flashback! What are you even talking about?
I believe the flashback scene is when he's getting Calvin to sign Hilde's freedom papers. Schultz keeps seeing the dog attack while Calvin is eating cake and he makes the harp player stop.
It was though. The dog attack happens off screen with just the screams being heard. You don't see it untill the flashback
@@JamesBrown-fx6xt Ah, OK. Now I get the point. I thought they meant the whole scene was a flashback.
Heavens Gate is TERRIBLE
You take that back!
It’s okay in my opinion that something is cut by the person who made the movie but not when it’s some stupid government that has done the same thing.
Joker 2 was edited as well, second viewing was missing somethings that were there my first watch
Mandela effect, it wasn't edited.
🎬🍿🎞🎥
First 🥇
Virgin nonsense