deck shoes? boat shoes? i preferred peter's shoes as the light colour is unusual. the sweeny guy has such terrible style. hair... hat... and paintings. wow. his whole expression is so slippery and trash. peter is a total genius fox as always. can he really believe the sweeny guy is cool? surely not.
Let’s go to the points-what do we see here? Two not very remarkable painters talking about a discipline that by now we know lost any capacity to make waves and to be interesting. These two dudes are there because they have a deal with a big gallery to see how they can make good money-nothing, absolutely nothing else is there.
the thing i enjoyed most about this was the matching loafers
deck shoes? boat shoes? i preferred peter's shoes as the light colour is unusual. the sweeny guy has such terrible style. hair... hat... and paintings. wow. his whole expression is so slippery and trash. peter is a total genius fox as always. can he really believe the sweeny guy is cool? surely not.
excellent conversation. peter's questions are very well aimed and provide great jumping off points for sweeney's insights. thanks
Enjoyed this. I really like the observation about Matisse’s Boy at the Piano being a suggestion, and linking that to Sweeney.
A living master.
That Egyptian chair in the background is very eye catching.👀
Nice conversation.👍
how the heck does he have this studio in NYC?!
Probably has had it for 40 years and has that rent locked down or owns at 1980's prices.
Crazy eyebrows
Plop art
Don't care for any art work I've seen here...
Let’s go to the points-what do we see here? Two not very remarkable painters talking about a discipline that by now we know lost any capacity to make waves and to be interesting. These two dudes are there because they have a deal with a big gallery to see how they can make good money-nothing, absolutely nothing else is there.
Not good at making art .quite bad no feelings or connection in those paintings