I have 2 PCP`s but spent this morning shooting one of my springers. Like you say, you have to go back to basics and shoot properly. There is someting about a springer that I just love. I used to use a 7.62 SLR in a previous life (best rifle ever) and loved feeling the recoil. Although not quite the same, the springer is the closest I can legaly get to that. And it does take more skill than a point and shoot PCP. I still use my 1973 Diana Series 70 Model 73 for shorter ranges. Keep up the good work, great videos.
Nice content as always guys. I think new people entering shooting should get a better scopes straight away.as It will help their targeting leading to more accuracy and enjoyment and you don't have to spend loads to get one .maybe you could do video on scopes in the lower and mid price ranges and differences this would help newcomers to the sport.i started with scope that came with first gun then got a bugbuster which improved my shooting no end.now I have an imersive optics witch I got from range and country and that is fabulous.
Truly can't believe that two reviewers who assume work for Range & County Airguns can't be bothered to put a decent scope onto the rifle to show it's best potential and also didn't even mention the fact that all rifles, be they PCP, Rimfire or break barrel springers, etc, all have best suited pellets and ammunition for that particular rifle barrel etc, and that you also didn't even tests a variety of pellets to show this. That some rifles may be more pellet fussy than others etc. You also mention the utter nonsense that I hear from other shooters claiming that a silencer doesn't benefit a springer rifle due to the mechanical noice from the spring. This is utter rubbish, all rifles that have a bark at the end of the barrel will benefit from a silencer. That some PCP rifles have a load bark and also hammer spring noice and that when the bark is suppressed by a silencer you can hear the hammer spring even more, just as you can with a break barrel. Maybe you lot need to watch a good few reviews yourselves and do some testing to even see for yourself. I've even done all of this myself personally with my variety of rifles.
Just a observation on scopes. When you get older (77 in my case) cheap scopes are no good. Impossible to get focus and you can often see a double reticule. After getting an AO scope, what a difference. You can adjust it to be perfectly clear.
I have 2 PCP`s but spent this morning shooting one of my springers. Like you say, you have to go back to basics and shoot properly. There is someting about a springer that I just love. I used to use a 7.62 SLR in a previous life (best rifle ever) and loved feeling the recoil. Although not quite the same, the springer is the closest I can legaly get to that. And it does take more skill than a point and shoot PCP. I still use my 1973 Diana Series 70 Model 73 for shorter ranges. Keep up the good work, great videos.
Another brilliant upload
Look forward to the next one
And I love getting my hw 97 out and having a plink with a few spinners in the garden
Will be ordering a Vixen from you guys at the end of April 😊
I think you may have a Ghost with you guys 😱 🤣
Got of the muddy girl for my daughter had to upgrade the scope as it out shot the one it came with 🤔🤔
Nice content as always guys. I think new people entering shooting should get a better scopes straight away.as It will help their targeting leading to more accuracy and enjoyment and you don't have to spend loads to get one .maybe you could do video on scopes in the lower and mid price ranges and differences this would help newcomers to the sport.i started with scope that came with first gun then got a bugbuster which improved my shooting no end.now I have an imersive optics witch I got from range and country and that is fabulous.
Truly can't believe that two reviewers who assume work for Range & County Airguns can't be bothered to put a decent scope onto the rifle to show it's best potential and also didn't even mention the fact that all rifles, be they PCP, Rimfire or break barrel springers, etc, all have best suited pellets and ammunition for that particular rifle barrel etc, and that you also didn't even tests a variety of pellets to show this. That some rifles may be more pellet fussy than others etc. You also mention the utter nonsense that I hear from other shooters claiming that a silencer doesn't benefit a springer rifle due to the mechanical noice from the spring. This is utter rubbish, all rifles that have a bark at the end of the barrel will benefit from a silencer. That some PCP rifles have a load bark and also hammer spring noice and that when the bark is suppressed by a silencer you can hear the hammer spring even more, just as you can with a break barrel. Maybe you lot need to watch a good few reviews yourselves and do some testing to even see for yourself. I've even done all of this myself personally with my variety of rifles.
I’ve got BSA springers from the 60’s 70’s and 80’s that are a lot more accurate,and you can find them for the same money or less!
Just a observation on scopes. When you get older (77 in my case) cheap scopes are no good. Impossible to get focus and you can often see a double reticule. After getting an AO scope, what a difference. You can adjust it to be perfectly clear.
Giants thumbnail...😂😂😂😂
Cheap rifles=aweful triggers. Did you find the right pellet?
nice gun,terrible shooting, what a disaster. and more excuses than boris johonson, ha ha, like the package tho. nice one.