Xbox Series S: 1440p/60fps with temporal reconstruction Xbox Series X: 2160p/60fps with temporal reconstruction PS5: 2160p/60fps with temporal reconstruction PC: 2160p Max. Settings DLSS Performance (Frame Generation OFF) RTX 4060Ti/4070/4070Ti/4080 | 32GB DDR5 | i9 12900K - Compra en Instant-Gaming a través de este link afiliado para cualquier plataforma y ayudarás mucho al canal! www.instant-gaming.com/es/?igr=analistadebits - Las versiones de consola tienen un único modo de visualización. - Xbox Series S tiene algunos recortes en oclusión ambiental, sombras y texturizado. - Xbox Series X y PS5 usan settings similares a Alto/Ultra en PC. - El framerate en consolas se mantiene sin muchos problemas a 60fps, aunque hay algunos pequeños problemas de stuttering. - Tiempos de carga más rápidos en PC, seguido por Xbox Series S. - La versión de PC tiene desactivado Frame Generation en esta comparativa. - Diablo IV es una de las mejores optimizaciones que he visto tanto en consolas, como en PC. Sin duda, da igual donde lo disfrutes, será una buena experiencia. - Buy games at Instant-Gaming for all platforms with discounts! www.instant-gaming.com/es/?igr=analistadebits Win a game a month with my Instant-Gaming contest. To participate, all you have to do is choose any game in Stock from their website: www.instant-gaming.com/es/giveaway/ANALISTABITS - The console versions have a single graphics mode. - Xbox Series S has some clipping in ambient occlusion, shadows and texturing. - Xbox Series X and PS5 use settings similar to High/Ultra on PC. - The framerate on consoles remains smooth at 60fps, although there are some minor stuttering issues. - Faster load times on PC, followed by Xbox Series S. - The PC version has Frame Generation disabled in this comparison. - Diablo IV is one of the best optimizations I have seen both on consoles and PC. Without a doubt, no matter where you enjoy it, it will be a good experience.
Uma vergonha o que fizeram com Street 6. O RE4 também tem problemas sérios de texturas no modo qualidade e até agora não foi corrigido. Só porque vende mais no PS5 , não justifica lançar o game cagado pra outras plataformas.
@@dominifreitas6570 Capcom, from software, Sony, Nintendo, Toyota, Canon. Japanese brand. Xbox is not a big deal by the way. Xbox fanboy only renting gamss soo😂😂😂
@@juanchitocruz no no lo creo. Para los que les gusta xbox es mejor ahorrar un poco mas y decidirse por xsx la s ya se ve como en todos los juegos que estan saliendo últimamente les quitan rendimiento por todos lados
@@kostasbousbouras2654 Don’t make excuses for lazy paid sony devs because there was a issue where a character didn’t have beard 🧔♂️ on Series S but had a beard on SX and PS5 😂 So a series s can’t handle to render a beard on a character or extra characters in the background. I call BS! 😂
@@marshalldteach3545 What about RE 2/3/7/8? What about CyberPunk? What about Atomic Heart? What about Gears 5? What about Hellblade? What about Far Cry 5/6? What about AC Valhalla? What about Halo Infinite? What about Mortal Kombat 11?
@@makotoyuki7403 re games are much lighter compared to others. Cyberpunk/ac valhalla runs at 720p-900p 60fps so good luck lmao Gear 5 and atomic heart are basically exclusive yet runs at just 1080p 60fps. Not even 1440p. L
@@marshalldteach3545 Cyberpunk uses FSR 2.0 at 1080p, if we pick on Series X and ps5 the game need to downgrade alot the resolution to 1200p. Valhalla almost the same, runs 90% at 1000p and has resolution drops like Ps5 and Series X dropping res of 1700p to 1100p. Atomic Heart is not exclusive and runs at 1080p60 with high preset, Hifi Rush runs at 1440p60, Hogwarts Legacy runs at 1080p60, Dead Island 2 runs at 1080p60 with high preset. The Witcher 3 and Deathloop, GTA V the same thing, 1080p60 with high preset The problem is not the console, is trash optimization at 2022 and 2023
@@marshalldteach3545 and why 1440p when the most resolution used is 1080p? Just look at Steam, people with high end PC's and still play at 1080p. 1080p60>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4K30.
In my mind, this is the first true AAA release in about 5 years apart from a few outliers on PS5. Game looks great, runs better, minor server issues which is a feat for such a huge launch, likely the most selling game of all time within the week (especially if we don't count Modern Warfare 2022...cause they STILL refuse release sales info after claiming the most sold title), excellent story, hundreds of hours of content in an age where it is rare to find 20 hours in a game, and a commitment from the devs to listen to their fanbase during development leading to a product that pretty much everyone is happy with...and more content dropping next month already !! Diablo IV is the new standard for hybrid PVP/PVE games. Absolute blast to play something that just keeps going, hour after hour, love it. And it has something to offer every skill level, which is smart marketing.
Honestly this is the first gen of consoles where pc vs console is basicaly bo differeence, at least nothing like it was from the ps3/360 days, or ps4/xbone days
No veo ningún fracasado tirando mierd* a la xbox series S , activision sabe optimizar los juegos en esta y todas las consolas, no como otras que no quieren pasar trabajo ninguno metiendo version old gen
@@johndodo2062 not really. I own both systems and load time is about the same with the PS5 sometimes being 2 or 3 seconds faster but it's not a big difference and even elden ring has the same load time on sx as the PS5. It often comes down to optimization.
@@FelRvT a pesar de que decia 1440p se veia mucho mas borrosa que las demás versiónes, pero ahora se ve realmente cerca de 1440p y desente, para nada borrosa, compara la parte donde hace zoom al platillo dentro de la taberna en beta vs ahora.
Diablo 3 on console characters can walk and roll over and it can be played offline. Diablo 4 in all platforms dont have some kind of unique changes to it, just graphics comparison.
It really does, Played a few games from the xbox series X to pc and they look pretty close. PC looks better but consoles is 95% close and very optimized
It has pretty severe texture loading, stuttering, and loading issues on hard drives from what I've seen from people playing on older rigs. But yeah, perhaps with some cutbacks.
Se ve igual parejo todas las versiones , ya va a salir 1 que te va decir se ve 1 pixel mas acá jaja como si fuera hacer diferencias jaja en el gameplay mientras juegas
Everyone trying to justify series s purchase 😂. It’s not good people. This game is very limited in what u can see on screen so it will do ok. Should’ve saved ur money or waited till u could afford the ps5 or series x
@@chrisk1458 Firstly, not 5000, but 1500 will be enough for the picture to look better than on consoles. Secondly, this does not negate the fact that I said, what's the difference how much a PC costs? :)
I play on Xbox Series X it looks absolutely amazing this game really is next gen and very happy with my console it's 4k 60/120fps the equivalent of an RTX 2080Ti.
2080ti performnce? Lol, typical trolling comments even in 2023? PS5 barely compared to 2060ti.. Xbox Series X barely compared to 2070 Those GPU was mid range in 2020.. now, even 4070 can match 2080ti Lol.. Even PS5 Pro or whatever they gonna call it probebly won't surpass mid range GPUs of 2023-2024
@johanmelis12 Digital Foundry are fans of PS5.. plus the comparison wasn't very accurate, because the games preset wasn't 100% same settings Consoles use different presets not the same of PC, also the optimizations on console are better So yeah, even while I have PS5, RTX 2070 have better raw power
They are shills because they bitched about DMC5 not being stable 60fps but they just gave a pass and calling it a masterpiece on the new breath of the wild sequel game which couldn’t even hold a stable 30FPS at launch and dropped into a 10-15fps. 😂
PS5 de nuevo superior a SX. SX con caidas de frames otra vez y stuttering. Ya es tan típico en esa consola que empieza a parecer fallo de hardware y dudo que lo arreglen.
@FaZe bRuTaL its the way the game is coded and the amount of enemies on screen. Running at a double the framerate would take a lot more processing power.
PC with a PS5 controller should be even better. Of course the comparisons here show PC as DLSS performance which I've never ran as it waters down the visuals greatly. I guess if you want PC as close to consoles as possible, DLSS performance would be the way to do it.
I'd rank PC as first because you can have higher refresh rates than 60. Idk why they didnt include a 120hz for consoles. Second I'd rank PS5 because of the dualsense. Performance wise the consoles all seem equal. Would've been cool if they didn't add an artifical loading screen on PS5, it really shouldn't have any loading screens at all on that version
This doesnt look good lol its not nintendo where you get a pass on the graphics this at best a 2015 game, like for example gta 5 ps4 looks almost better than this...
Its hard to tell which one have the best graphics on 360p. To be honest i think the xsx and ps5 are almost the same, i think the xsx have a bit better details , because thats on the most games that releases multiplatform. I can be wrong but its what i think 😅😅
What you think is not even close to reality. Multi platform games are better on PS5 90% of the time. I admit the differences are very marginal though (I have both systems). Peace.
@@0liveRoudoudou i have both 2 and i can see a bit more graphical detail on the series x, even on some games a higher resolution. Like some games are 1800p on ps While on series x 1900p.
@@lelouchabrilvelda1794 Power efficiency goes to the 4090 as the 40 series is far more efficient per watt than RDNA2 is. The 40 series in general, especially the laptop varients, get far more performance per watt. The PS5's only advantage is in overall power consumption. Dual Sense works perfectly on PC and I use it myself on PC with no issues. Plus games like Spider-Man 2018 support adaptive triggers just like the PS5 version. Units sold doesn't really matter as individual PC GPUs aren't designed to be sold in that many units as they are replaced every 2 years unlike a console whose lifetime is closer to 5-8 years. Japanese brand doesn't really matter, especially since Sony is practically an American company at this point with them moving their HQ to California.
@@lelouchabrilvelda1794 Price also is a factor PC's don't beat due to how these things are sold. Consoles make most of their money on games sold while PC GPUs must make their profit on purchase date so of course profit margins are much higher on PC GPUs than they are for an individual console
How pathetic is the Series S calling itself next gen just because it's 60fps. Xbox One X is the same resolution at 30fps. Next gen is suppose to be leaps and bounds ahead. SMH. Sad.
Series S on that game plays like it's designed to, at its highest target resolution, 60fps and a very good load time. And people still complains, you know Microsoft offers a premium console also.
@@frankiesab777 I just think it was unnecessary to make a weaker console (Graphically) at all. Yes I own a Series X, but only use it for things I can't play on my One X which are few. And i have a Ps5. So MS need more games to keep people interested anyway. just my thoughts. I paid probably too much for my 4K TV, i want things that can actually take advantage of it. And most times the Series S is a 1080p machine or less. So no sale for me. But i'm not a Diablo fan anyway. lol.
@@OzLex-oc8ob No le sigas el juego gente asi solo vive de tirar hate todo por tener una sola consola o no tener la contraria jajaja, no vale la pena intoxicarse de mas las diferencias son minimas y aparte ya cuando uno juega ni nota lo tecnico, un ejemplo el nuevo zelda corre hasta a menos de 30 pero se disfruta sin importar que vaya a eso o menos.
No way my friend. The mid generation versions are going to come out next year or so and be equivalent or better than the RTX 4090 for a quarter of the price.
@@BeyondEllisBeck PS4: 1.83 tflops, PS4 Pro: 4.20 Tflops, PS5: 10.28 Tflops.... RTX 4090: 83-86 Tflops. It's not happening. The last refresh was dual GPU config target spec with a slight increase to clock speed, so you may be looking at 22-24 Tflops on a PS5 Pro. Keep in mind too, his comparison video is showing PC running DLSS performance, which renders at a very low resolution and upscales it to 4k. 4090 would run this game 4k native, and likely at 120fps with maybe frame generation needing to be enabled.
@@BeyondEllisBeck I don't what your smoking to think that a mid generation refresh could even come close to a 4090 with an affordable price. Also I don't think there will be a mid gen refresh outside of a PS5 Slim
@@Mcnooblet Tflops do not equate to relative gaming performance. It's funny though, recently so many individuals started caring about Tflops when these consoles came out yet they have no idea how they truly work. I don't understand why people are so comfortable with being ignorant but it's honestly starting to get pretty annoying. AMD have GPUs with far less TFlops than Nvidia yet it can trade blows with the 4090 regardless. This would be no different for the consoles.
Xbox Series S: 1440p/60fps with temporal reconstruction
Xbox Series X: 2160p/60fps with temporal reconstruction
PS5: 2160p/60fps with temporal reconstruction
PC: 2160p Max. Settings DLSS Performance (Frame Generation OFF)
RTX 4060Ti/4070/4070Ti/4080 | 32GB DDR5 | i9 12900K
- Compra en Instant-Gaming a través de este link afiliado para cualquier plataforma y ayudarás mucho al canal!
www.instant-gaming.com/es/?igr=analistadebits
- Las versiones de consola tienen un único modo de visualización.
- Xbox Series S tiene algunos recortes en oclusión ambiental, sombras y texturizado.
- Xbox Series X y PS5 usan settings similares a Alto/Ultra en PC.
- El framerate en consolas se mantiene sin muchos problemas a 60fps, aunque hay algunos pequeños problemas de stuttering.
- Tiempos de carga más rápidos en PC, seguido por Xbox Series S.
- La versión de PC tiene desactivado Frame Generation en esta comparativa.
- Diablo IV es una de las mejores optimizaciones que he visto tanto en consolas, como en PC. Sin duda, da igual donde lo disfrutes, será una buena experiencia.
- Buy games at Instant-Gaming for all platforms with discounts! www.instant-gaming.com/es/?igr=analistadebits
Win a game a month with my Instant-Gaming contest. To participate, all you have to do is choose any game in Stock from their website: www.instant-gaming.com/es/giveaway/ANALISTABITS
- The console versions have a single graphics mode.
- Xbox Series S has some clipping in ambient occlusion, shadows and texturing.
- Xbox Series X and PS5 use settings similar to High/Ultra on PC.
- The framerate on consoles remains smooth at 60fps, although there are some minor stuttering issues.
- Faster load times on PC, followed by Xbox Series S.
- The PC version has Frame Generation disabled in this comparison.
- Diablo IV is one of the best optimizations I have seen both on consoles and PC. Without a doubt, no matter where you enjoy it, it will be a good experience.
the video is uploaded in 360p
@@TheManquion No
@@عصام_البارودي potato
@@عصام_البارودي your console is on rx 570 level
@@raven7988-v5n cry niqq
Honestly, the Xbox Series S looks great if you don't compare it side-by-side. Blizzard did an excellent job with this release.
Series S is great if you come from One S. Casual players not care about graphics, as well
A slap in the face of Street fighter 6
@@charlesfalcao3918 true but hey! Japanese devs. They never like to optimise xbox games
@@iconofsin4578Bandai Namco would like a word…
@@kaigarcia3163 oh really. What have they done?
Capcom, veja isso e aprende a fazer uma versão decente para o XSS!
Uma vergonha o que fizeram com Street 6.
O RE4 também tem problemas sérios de texturas no modo qualidade e até agora não foi corrigido.
Só porque vende mais no PS5 , não justifica lançar o game cagado pra outras plataformas.
vamos... diablo 4 en mi 2060 21:9 va en ultra a 100fps jajajaj si series s no puede con esto mal vamos...
@@dominifreitas6570 Capcom, from software, Sony, Nintendo, Toyota, Canon.
Japanese brand.
Xbox is not a big deal by the way.
Xbox fanboy only renting gamss soo😂😂😂
Pois é! O fizeram muito bem o Remake do 3 e o Vilage... mas o RE4 é Street 6.... tá abaixo
The fact they optimized for each platform makes me want to play it despite not being familiar with the series.
Love your videos great comparisons, graphic wise on different consoles
Muy curioso que cuando un estudio quiere saca todo el provecho de series S y las diferencias son mínimas
Mínimas😅 yo aqui sigo viendo a xss muy capada que consolita mas 💩
super minimas xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD por favor... eso en una tv de 55 pulgadasdebe parecer de nitidez algo de ps360
A diferença entre 1440p e 4k é muito grande
@@jeancarlosmunoz21 cuesta prácticamente la mita, que esperas ??? Para lo que vale es excelente
@@juanchitocruz no no lo creo. Para los que les gusta xbox es mejor ahorrar un poco mas y decidirse por xsx la s ya se ve como en todos los juegos que estan saliendo últimamente les quitan rendimiento por todos lados
Sad that Street Fighter 6 didn’t put no effort into the Series S like Diablo 4 did
Totally different games, no reason to compare them. SF6 actually is a more demanding game that Diablo4.
@@kostasbousbouras2654 Don’t make excuses for lazy paid sony devs because there was a issue where a character didn’t have beard 🧔♂️ on Series S but had a beard on SX and PS5 😂 So a series s can’t handle to render a beard on a character or extra characters in the background. I call BS! 😂
@@kostasbousbouras2654 I can't imagine SF6 being more demanding than the optimization for Witcher 3 on XSS
When a dev puts in the time the Series S shines.
Yea it shines on games as light as diablo 4 except heavy ones lmao
@@marshalldteach3545
What about RE 2/3/7/8?
What about CyberPunk?
What about Atomic Heart?
What about Gears 5?
What about Hellblade?
What about Far Cry 5/6?
What about AC Valhalla?
What about Halo Infinite?
What about Mortal Kombat 11?
@@makotoyuki7403 re games are much lighter compared to others.
Cyberpunk/ac valhalla runs at 720p-900p 60fps so good luck lmao
Gear 5 and atomic heart are basically exclusive yet runs at just 1080p 60fps. Not even 1440p.
L
@@marshalldteach3545 Cyberpunk uses FSR 2.0 at 1080p, if we pick on Series X and ps5 the game need to downgrade alot the resolution to 1200p. Valhalla almost the same, runs 90% at 1000p and has resolution drops like Ps5 and Series X dropping res of 1700p to 1100p. Atomic Heart is not exclusive and runs at 1080p60 with high preset, Hifi Rush runs at 1440p60, Hogwarts Legacy runs at 1080p60, Dead Island 2 runs at 1080p60 with high preset. The Witcher 3 and Deathloop, GTA V the same thing, 1080p60 with high preset The problem is not the console, is trash optimization at 2022 and 2023
@@marshalldteach3545 and why 1440p when the most resolution used is 1080p? Just look at Steam, people with high end PC's and still play at 1080p. 1080p60>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4K30.
Let's see if they fixed the HDR black level raise with a day one patch. Anybody heard anything yet?
In my mind, this is the first true AAA release in about 5 years apart from a few outliers on PS5. Game looks great, runs better, minor server issues which is a feat for such a huge launch, likely the most selling game of all time within the week (especially if we don't count Modern Warfare 2022...cause they STILL refuse release sales info after claiming the most sold title), excellent story, hundreds of hours of content in an age where it is rare to find 20 hours in a game, and a commitment from the devs to listen to their fanbase during development leading to a product that pretty much everyone is happy with...and more content dropping next month already !!
Diablo IV is the new standard for hybrid PVP/PVE games. Absolute blast to play something that just keeps going, hour after hour, love it. And it has something to offer every skill level, which is smart marketing.
Loading time while traveling to Kyovashad mostly depends on number of players in, so using it it comparison is failure.
A geração de quadros está ativa sim conforme vc mostra em seu vídeo. A descrição tem esse erro ao mencionar o teste sem o dlss 3.
Best comparison channel on RUclips
Digital Foundry is great as well
Honestly this is the first gen of consoles where pc vs console is basicaly bo differeence, at least nothing like it was from the ps3/360 days, or ps4/xbone days
No veo ningún fracasado tirando mierd* a la xbox series S , activision sabe optimizar los juegos en esta y todas las consolas, no como otras que no quieren pasar trabajo ninguno metiendo version old gen
Are ultra textures on pc and console textures exactly the same?
No PC is slightly better but not by much.
@@TDR-0484 Ya, Seeing the same. PC does look a little better but consoles is pretty close.
Been waiting on this. Thank you so much for always doing these. ❤
A mí me interesaría la opción de Steam Deck, sobre todo conectada a un televisor grande. No sé si por temas de resolución podría ser no recomendable.
They are in the process of verifying it now for Steam Deck, not sure if it will hit 800p or not, but perhaps. Should be interesting.
@@drummer7557 is not even on steam lol
I always have the hardest time figuring out which system to get a game for , either Ps5 or SX
It's surprising how the XSX keeps up wit the load times of the PS5. There's absolutely no impact on the SSD speed difference.
PC and SS load faster depending on your PC of course. PS5 was never that much faster anyway and a few games even load faster on SX.
@@Rooster832 90% load faster on ps5 and some of them by quite a bit
@@johndodo2062 not really. I own both systems and load time is about the same with the PS5 sometimes being 2 or 3 seconds faster but it's not a big difference and even elden ring has the same load time on sx as the PS5. It often comes down to optimization.
PC loads faster than both if you have a good CPU and ssd
@@Rooster832 RAMdrive loads faster if you have 128GB like me. :p
Pregunta si compre el juego en la store de microsoft en la consola series, puedo instalarlo también en mi pc 🤔?
Estaba esperando esta comparativa para decidir sistema, muchas gracias por tu gran trabajo.
Si solo te interesa este juego ve a por pc
@@XReaper910por?
Mejoro la version de series S, con respecto a la beta ?
Que le pasaba a la beta en series S?
@@FelRvT a pesar de que decia 1440p se veia mucho mas borrosa que las demás versiónes, pero ahora se ve realmente cerca de 1440p y desente, para nada borrosa, compara la parte donde hace zoom al platillo dentro de la taberna en beta vs ahora.
Diablo 3 on console characters can walk and roll over and it can be played offline. Diablo 4 in all platforms dont have some kind of unique changes to it, just graphics comparison.
The Series X looks amazing
It really does, Played a few games from the xbox series X to pc and they look pretty close. PC looks better but consoles is 95% close and very optimized
Series S tá ótimo! 1440p é muito top. Chamo de Mimi 4k 😅🤣
Saben q tal funciona en ps4?
Series X!!!!
Mann! If you have this for series s don't feel bad at all they did a good job!!! Say all you want that little Monster still kicks azzzzzz 😆
I definitely can compare all this in 360p 😆
Sounds like a you problem
lo mas bonito es cuando pones las 4 graficas en comparación
PC>XSX>PS5>XSS
Ps5❤
Xbox Series S is a beast.
In terms of load times compared to its big brother, the Series X
Series s is a potato
Try to convince yourselves...
Street Fighter 6. Series 🥔🥔🥔
This game looks like it could have been made very well on the previous gen on 30fps with resolution from 1080p to 4k.
It has pretty severe texture loading, stuttering, and loading issues on hard drives from what I've seen from people playing on older rigs. But yeah, perhaps with some cutbacks.
Nah, we are at half life of this generation and the previous ps4 and xbox one needs to stop to be supported
@@wicho99w99 capitalism say that no - the previous gen doesn't *need to get the suport halted, since it brings money, and shareholders want money.
No 4090?
Esa 4070Ti tiene mucho stuttering, que raro.
360p??? WTF
Exactly the same!
Series X and PS5 se ve lo mismo literal , yo que tengo Series S y PS5 obviamente lo compraré para PS5.
360p hum
Still processing the video, RUclips's fault
I have a 7900xtx and it's been great. The winner here is the xbox ss.
Actually it's 1280p on PS5/ XSX and 864p on XSS....
No it’s not man
Prácticamente lo mismo en todas las plataformas.
Far from that. Series S version is MUCH lower quality.
Se ve igual parejo todas las versiones , ya va a salir 1 que te va decir se ve 1 pixel mas acá jaja como si fuera hacer diferencias jaja en el gameplay mientras juegas
@@itycagameplaysse ve casi igual en series s con respecto a las otras, creo que tienes algo parecido al daltonismo.
@@Ragh.34 You're either blind or nuts, dude.
Vendo na tela do seu celular e a mesma sim
SERIES S❤
Estou jogando versão de PC no máximo sem FG e dlss e esta muito superior o que esta sendo demonstrado nesse vídeo, um tanto estranho isso!
Compressão do RUclips?
@@pandazpaa Acho que não seja isso, por mais que sabemos q aconteça, mas da pra notar uma falta elementos, sombras... como eu disse estranho.
Everyone trying to justify series s purchase 😂. It’s not good people. This game is very limited in what u can see on screen so it will do ok. Should’ve saved ur money or waited till u could afford the ps5 or series x
looks like PS5 has better action buttons symbols
Só Nova geração esse jogo?????
Yes
No, PS 4 y one también.
No
Take notes, Capcom.
As always, the best picture on PC!
500 vs 5000€
@@chrisk1458 You don't need to spend that much to beat the PS5
@@crestofhonor2349 yess 1000$ is more than Enough
@@chrisk1458 Firstly, not 5000, but 1500 will be enough for the picture to look better than on consoles. Secondly, this does not negate the fact that I said, what's the difference how much a PC costs? :)
@@chrisk1458 not really, my PC cost 900 and is better than PS5. And is not only for play games.
Literalmente a mesma coisa, seja na GTX 750TI ou na RTX 4090, seja no PS1 ou no PS5 😂
Você percebe a diferença jogando, não só com imagem estática
Series s is little quiet monster
No it's not.
🥔
Why no ps4
Como se puede observar en varias capturas,
la flama Series X supera a su competencia en un alarde técnico sin precedentes.
Keep dreaming.
Qué estas fumando amigo? Ps5 fue igual de bueno!
Jajaja
@@Exlee-dq9uo deve ser algo vencido rss
@@Exlee-dq9uo a ver Ps5 se le acerca, le olfatea la flamante estela X pero no llega lo sabes 💪
Australia 🦘
Now it blows my mind
Kangaroo with boxing gloves and beer
next gen r the same. marginal differences! have fun!
btw. good game.
Xbox series S ouaaaa 240€ lol
Big W to Blizzard
Ps5 top demais😍😍
Capado
Brazil 🇧🇷
🇧🇷
I play on Xbox Series X it looks absolutely amazing this game really is next gen and very happy with my console it's 4k 60/120fps the equivalent of an RTX 2080Ti.
Xbox Series X has worse performance than RTX 2080Ti.
2080ti performnce? Lol, typical trolling comments even in 2023?
PS5 barely compared to 2060ti.. Xbox Series X barely compared to 2070
Those GPU was mid range in 2020.. now, even 4070 can match 2080ti Lol..
Even PS5 Pro or whatever they gonna call it probebly won't surpass mid range GPUs of 2023-2024
They're closer to 2070 super level or 6650XT
@@Jack_Sparrow131digitalfoundry compares ps5 and series x to 2070super and 2080super
@johanmelis12 Digital Foundry are fans of PS5.. plus the comparison wasn't very accurate, because the games preset wasn't 100% same settings
Consoles use different presets not the same of PC, also the optimizations on console are better
So yeah, even while I have PS5, RTX 2070 have better raw power
For ps4 but not for switch
Offcourse
❤❤
I don't see a difference between ps5 and pc.
There's a difference but the difference isnt as big between console and pc now days.
Series X and ps5 looks good
Greece 🇬🇷
That's even more interesting
Turkey 🇹🇷
That's interesting
@@0liveRoudoudou why??!
And the winner is... Nintendo switch
😂
En donde esta la gran superioridad de xsx que no la vemos😂😂😂
PlayStation 5 destroys rtx 4060ti
LoooooooooL
SeriesX looks slightly better than Ps5 but that’s typical
Played on both. Doubt
Theys no deference.
But in terms of sell the ps5 is superior.
Where? tell us.
これなんか意味あるんか？(笑)
Digital Foundry says the best version of consoles is the Xbox Series X
They are shills because they bitched about DMC5 not being stable 60fps but they just gave a pass and calling it a masterpiece on the new breath of the wild sequel game which couldn’t even hold a stable 30FPS at launch and dropped into a 10-15fps. 😂
PS5 de nuevo superior a SX.
SX con caidas de frames otra vez y stuttering. Ya es tan típico en esa consola que empieza a parecer fallo de hardware y dudo que lo arreglen.
This game needed a 1440p 120 mode on ps5 ngl
Unplayable
@@chrisk1458 what?
Consoles cpu couldn't handle it
@@TDR-0484 highly doubt that, there are better looking games that run at 60+ on ps5
@FaZe bRuTaL its the way the game is coded and the amount of enemies on screen. Running at a double the framerate would take a lot more processing power.
PS5 is the only way
Of course, because this game looks and plays so much different on Sony's machine, lol
PC with a PS5 controller should be even better. Of course the comparisons here show PC as DLSS performance which I've never ran as it waters down the visuals greatly. I guess if you want PC as close to consoles as possible, DLSS performance would be the way to do it.
Plays best on series x as expected
Es igual a PS 5.
I'd rank PC as first because you can have higher refresh rates than 60. Idk why they didnt include a 120hz for consoles.
Second I'd rank PS5 because of the dualsense. Performance wise the consoles all seem equal. Would've been cool if they didn't add an artifical loading screen on PS5, it really shouldn't have any loading screens at all on that version
Where did this come from?...Exactly the same on PS5. Exactly in everything.
@@markus9641 sadly I've heard that the game barely uses the dualsense's features.
This doesnt look good lol its not nintendo where you get a pass on the graphics this at best a 2015 game, like for example gta 5 ps4 looks almost better than this...
Its hard to tell which one have the best graphics on 360p.
To be honest i think the xsx and ps5 are almost the same, i think the xsx have a bit better details , because thats on the most games that releases multiplatform.
I can be wrong but its what i think 😅😅
What you think is not even close to reality. Multi platform games are better on PS5 90% of the time. I admit the differences are very marginal though (I have both systems). Peace.
Well you are wrong
@@0liveRoudoudou i have both 2 and i can see a bit more graphical detail on the series x, even on some games a higher resolution.
Like some games are 1800p on ps While on series x 1900p.
@@erwinschimmel9885 Great for you. I have both systems too and the PS5 gives me smoother framerate in 95% of multiplat.
@@wickywak1 Ok fanboy... we already read you, you don't need to say it twice 😂.
Ps5 better
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Not in terms of load times behind both the Series S and PC
@@thedoomslayer108_YT In this game maybe....
😂😂😂 xbox series X much better
Xbox lame Ekekeke😆😆
I have to admit despite being the owner of a pc with a 4090 that the ps5 version is far superior😓
In what way is the PS5 version superior?
@@crestofhonor2349 In price, power efficient, controller, exclusive games, 50 million sold unit and its japanese brand.
@@lelouchabrilvelda1794 Power efficiency goes to the 4090 as the 40 series is far more efficient per watt than RDNA2 is. The 40 series in general, especially the laptop varients, get far more performance per watt. The PS5's only advantage is in overall power consumption.
Dual Sense works perfectly on PC and I use it myself on PC with no issues. Plus games like Spider-Man 2018 support adaptive triggers just like the PS5 version.
Units sold doesn't really matter as individual PC GPUs aren't designed to be sold in that many units as they are replaced every 2 years unlike a console whose lifetime is closer to 5-8 years.
Japanese brand doesn't really matter, especially since Sony is practically an American company at this point with them moving their HQ to California.
@@lelouchabrilvelda1794 Price also is a factor PC's don't beat due to how these things are sold. Consoles make most of their money on games sold while PC GPUs must make their profit on purchase date so of course profit margins are much higher on PC GPUs than they are for an individual console
Ps5 fanboy trying to disguise as a 4090 owner 😂
How pathetic is the Series S calling itself next gen just because it's 60fps. Xbox One X is the same resolution at 30fps. Next gen is suppose to be leaps and bounds ahead. SMH. Sad.
Series S on that game plays like it's designed to, at its highest target resolution, 60fps and a very good load time. And people still complains, you know Microsoft offers a premium console also.
So 4k is next gen? Stupid
@@frankiesab777 I just think it was unnecessary to make a weaker console (Graphically) at all. Yes I own a Series X, but only use it for things I can't play on my One X which are few. And i have a Ps5. So MS need more games to keep people interested anyway. just my thoughts. I paid probably too much for my 4K TV, i want things that can actually take advantage of it. And most times the Series S is a 1080p machine or less. So no sale for me. But i'm not a Diablo fan anyway. lol.
Xbox Series X siempre con su descenso de fotogramas por segundo. Tanto que se hablaba del potencial de la maquina y siempre resulta ser peor que PS5.
Deja tu lado fanboy corren prácticamente iguales jajaja comentarios toxicos como el tuyo deberian ser eliminados.
@@chronox1763 debería correr mejor en Xbox series x.
Hay una diferencia técnica entre Xbox series x y ps5 como la que existía entre Snes y Génesis.
@@ENFDO pues estas mal de la vista, en series x se ve ligeramente superior a la versión de ps5.
@@OzLex-oc8ob No le sigas el juego gente asi solo vive de tirar hate todo por tener una sola consola o no tener la contraria jajaja, no vale la pena intoxicarse de mas las diferencias son minimas y aparte ya cuando uno juega ni nota lo tecnico, un ejemplo el nuevo zelda corre hasta a menos de 30 pero se disfruta sin importar que vaya a eso o menos.
My RTX 4090 with no issues what so ever miles better than the PS5. PCMASTERACE pushed Series X and PS5 back into last gen forever!.!
No way my friend. The mid generation versions are going to come out next year or so and be equivalent or better than the RTX 4090 for a quarter of the price.
@@BeyondEllisBeck PS4: 1.83 tflops, PS4 Pro: 4.20 Tflops, PS5: 10.28 Tflops.... RTX 4090: 83-86 Tflops. It's not happening. The last refresh was dual GPU config target spec with a slight increase to clock speed, so you may be looking at 22-24 Tflops on a PS5 Pro. Keep in mind too, his comparison video is showing PC running DLSS performance, which renders at a very low resolution and upscales it to 4k. 4090 would run this game 4k native, and likely at 120fps with maybe frame generation needing to be enabled.
@@BeyondEllisBeck I don't what your smoking to think that a mid generation refresh could even come close to a 4090 with an affordable price. Also I don't think there will be a mid gen refresh outside of a PS5 Slim
Quit it dude. I doubt you even have a 4090 and no one cares that it destroys the console
@@Mcnooblet Tflops do not equate to relative gaming performance. It's funny though, recently so many individuals started caring about Tflops when these consoles came out yet they have no idea how they truly work.
I don't understand why people are so comfortable with being ignorant but it's honestly starting to get pretty annoying.
AMD have GPUs with far less TFlops than Nvidia yet it can trade blows with the 4090 regardless. This would be no different for the consoles.
Hopefully you'll make another test video when raytracing is added to Diablo 4 soon :D
Como siempre la pley meando a los pilerdos