Mr. Bond, According to Esther at 4:11 "approaching the king" was a very dangerous thing to do. How, then did Esther inform the king of the plot to kill him at 2:22? (I think I might be able to explain this.)
She must have mentioned it at a point when he summoned her. Remember when she was told of Hamaan’s plan in Esther 4:11, she said she hadn’t been summoned by the King in 30 days. This means he had been summoning her often before then and she must have at one of those times found a way to tell the King of the plot to kill him
Dear Brothers, may I suggest that there were two ways to speak with the king? If the person were summoned, and if not. In the case of being summoned, there was no danger. But in the case of not being summoned (thereby interrupting the king's busy schedule), the "interrupter of the royal schedule"" accepted the risk that the king might be displeased by the interruption and execute the "interrupter". In ch 2, I propose that Esther bravely and urgently interrupted his schedule to warn him that two of the servants he trusted the most were about to kill him. She ran the risk of offending the king. But the king recognized that her interruption was worthy, and so spared her life. But despite her lifesaving effort, the king had apparently not thanked her, or even invited her for a chat for a month. So, in ch 4, Esther is contemplating risking her life again, but this time, to appeal to an apparently thankless king, on behalf of the Jews, a people the king might be very prejudiced against. How does that sound?
The Book of Esther: Lesson 3
Mr. Bond, According to Esther at 4:11 "approaching the king" was a very dangerous thing to do. How, then did Esther inform the king of the plot to kill him at 2:22? (I think I might be able to explain this.)
SHE MOST LIKELY WENT BEFORE HIM THE SAME AS IN CHAPTER 4 BUT THE SCRIPTURE DOESN'T TELL US. GOD BLESS YOU
She must have mentioned it at a point when he summoned her. Remember when she was told of Hamaan’s plan in Esther 4:11, she said she hadn’t been summoned by the King in 30 days.
This means he had been summoning her often before then and she must have at one of those times found a way to tell the King of the plot to kill him
Dear Brothers, may I suggest that there were two ways to speak with the king? If the person were summoned, and if not. In the case of being summoned, there was no danger. But in the case of not being summoned (thereby interrupting the king's busy schedule), the "interrupter of the royal schedule"" accepted the risk that the king might be displeased by the interruption and execute the "interrupter". In ch 2, I propose that Esther bravely and urgently interrupted his schedule to warn him that two of the servants he trusted the most were about to kill him. She ran the risk of offending the king. But the king recognized that her interruption was worthy, and so spared her life. But despite her lifesaving effort, the king had apparently not thanked her, or even invited her for a chat for a month. So, in ch 4, Esther is contemplating risking her life again, but this time, to appeal to an apparently thankless king, on behalf of the Jews, a people the king might be very prejudiced against. How does that sound?
Great content but Slow down.
Way too fast
GOD BLESS YOU. I JUST TALK FAST SORRY I WILL TRY TO SLOW DOWN
Go to your settings. Tap on your speed play back, choose .75
waw amazing i love it. waaaaaw
thank you for the encouragement
@@jbbond580 you are blessed. you know i only like the products of grace .
@@misganawkebede6823 I AGREE WITH YOU. I LOVE THE GRACE OF GOD
OMG man man man
Law law