Exploring the New Quantum HD Audio Interfaces | Presonus
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 май 2024
- Power your project with the next generation of high-speed USB-C audio interfaces from PreSonus. The all-new Quantum HD features flexibility and power for producers and engineers who require more for their audio production.
Learn more: www.presonus.com/quantum
The new Quantum HD 2 and HD 8 audio interfaces empower creators with high-quality audio production boasting newly-redesigned MAX-HD preamps, class-leading converters, and instrument inputs co-developed with industry-leading experts at Fender®.
QUANTUM HD TOP FEATURES:
• High Performance Signal Flow - low-latency, low-noise 32 bit/192 kHz audio converters
• All-New MAX-HD Mic Preamps - digitally-controlled analog with +75 dB of gain range
• Co-Developed with Fender® - Front-facing instrument inputs
• Professional Recording Software Included - 6 months of Studio One+ with full access to Studio One DAW, add-ons, and more.
• Auto Gain - Dial in recording-ready levels, hassle-free
• Universal Control App - Full control and metering on mobile, desktop, or tablet
Learn more and order yours now:
www.presonus.com/quantum
This video features a performance of "Better than Nothing" by the talented band Riarosa.
Exploring The New Quantum HD Audio Interfaces | PreSonus
#presonus #quantum #audiointerface #audioproduction #musicproduction #recording #studioone #proaudio 
Наука
Beautiful song and singer! The interface is nice…time to save up for it.
We think you'll LOVE this interface!!
@@presonus I was sold on it. I just purchased the HD 2 Model interface since I have the 1820 interface so I can expand. Great video PreSonus.
Excited about the 32 bit, but it is missing the talk back feature - which I used all the time on my Studio 192. I'll come up with a work around.
How does it do w/ iZotope plugins active while in record?
Is it possible to cascade the quantum HD series interfaces on windows 11? So not only as ADAT expansion but to use all the in and outputs of both devices?
Why these new line of interfaces do not have onboard dsp, please make updated interface
Do you have to use studio one? I record with Adobe audition will the interface still be capable to work with this program?
Our new interfaces will work with any app that plays or records audio!
All That Remain Is A Midi Keyboard Maybe 61keys From Presonus..
👀 👀 👀
I was interested in the HD 8 as I'm a Quantum 2626 user and was wondering what I'd get with the latest model. However, I've got 8 combo jacks on the front of my 2626 which seem to have moved round the back (and I don't have easy access to the back of my rack). Also, somebody told me that the RTL of these "newer" interfaces is far worse than the old Quantum line but I don't know if that's correct.
Can you confirm the RTL of these interfaces as compared to the Quantum 2626 and original Quantum?
And am I missing something about the inputs because having no combo jacks on the front of a rack mounted unit is kind of restricting?
This new line is in every way a downgrade from your existing interface. The added latency that usb-c brings to the table alone makes your 2626 superior. This new quantum is just a more expensive Studio 1824c with some added bells and whistles that quite frankly do not justify the increase in cost over the 2626. Keep your 2626.
@@MightyJophin yeah, I did wonder that tbh but thought Presonus may want to correct me if my initial impressions were wrong. Are there any official latency figures for the new line because if it really is back to 1824c levels (which I had and returned for the 2626) then Presonus should not be calling this a Quantum.
😂😂😂 I just came to see people tell a company how they suck while liking things the old way lmao 🤣 😂 all opinion based rofl 🤣 and why worry about what the rtl is if ur already hating on it 😂 🤣 😅 2626 doesn't even have conversion this good that's a step up right there then the dynamic range 😅😅😅 idk what yall be smoking 😅😅 thing works just as good as my apollo now the whole studio one and presonus together whole other can of worms
@@harpoleon6806No one that I have seen has said the new usb-c quantum HD sucks. The only comments that I have read has been around if the New usb-c quantum HD features warrants the release. (This is relative) If it does for you, keep being glad you bought it. I assume the increased latency over the thunderbolt release is a nonissue for you, and slightly better conversion is your primary reason for the purchase. That sounds like the extra 500 dollars spent makes sense for you.
@@MightyJophin have you tried one to see if latency is usable?
what was the microphone model ? sound great please let me know
Looks to me like a PreSonus PX-1.
Does the Quantum HD 8 have adequate outputs for Atmos?
With 8 outputs, Quantum HD 8 can help you achieve an Atmos setup.
Where can I get those exact colorful lights in the background?
Can't say for sure, but I've seen those on Temu. Look up "Colorful Floor Lamp." You'll want the LED ones with the little tripod feet.
No shipping to NZ? Was about to hit the buy button
Hello, Matt! We recommend you check with an authorized PreSonus dealer in your area!
Add a Quantum Pre to the lineup and take my money, please.
Please answer this my friend, I am currently using the IK Axe I/O for it’s incredible Hi-Z inputs with active/passive pickup adaptation, and variable impedance with jfet and pure settings as well. In addition, the Neural DSP quad quartex gives precision control over the instrument input as well through its interface. So far, I am considering the Quantum HD to replace my TB3 quantum 2626. I cannot find any information as to a juxtaposition of specifications between my Quantum 2626 and this new HD. Nor do I believe that it’s Presonus level of standards to have failed to make the Hi-Z inputs as flexible as products like the Axe I/O. I like that you “worked with Fender” on them. But this means little to me from a technical standpoint. What are the capabilities to vary the inputs to adjust to my different guitar tones and pickups, and if they do not currently exist have you planned for a software update that will enable that feature? Please juxtapose the Axe I/O with this HD 2 for guitar players, pros & cons. Thank you!
Yes we need a presonus midi keyboard fully integrated to Studio one.
👀 👀
@@presonusI’ve always imagined a midi keyboard from you guys with the auto mapping feature that you have on Atom SQ and Faderport 8…with a full color screen that gives you access to the Piano Roll/Browser and Condole in Studio One… 🤯🤯🤯🤯! One can dream tho right lol
I'm tired of tinker toy low quality midi keyboards. All of em SUCK. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF EM. I've been YELLING at Roland for years to make a good midi keyboard for real players but they continue to want to make you spend 4 grand for something you just don't need. Stuck with a Roland A-88 MKII where all the controls are too far to the left to comfortably use.
Hi! Can someone compare the new Presonus interfaces/preamps ES and HD series with Audient ID and UAD Apollo series? Thanks @AudientWorld @UAudio @PreSonus (Is it missing Dim and Solo Mono buttons or there are customisable buttons ?) There should be a Quantom HD 4 too @PreSonus
Nice advert for this bands new single; (Are they maybe related to some Presonus staff members?) - but the video didn't really spend much time on the "how to's" and "features" of the unit though...
I absolutely love my Digimax FX unit(s - I have 2), but literally everything else I have used or been tempted by from presonus since the Digimax has been just a little bit disappointing.
Man, so far, I love Studio One, but the HD8 is giving me glitches I haven't experienced since Windows XP, lol. My mic will sound robotic. The only way to fix it is to change the buffer to the same number or change it completely. I can't get the pipeline to work either because the output isn't sending a signal out, even though the send lights up. No return ever comes, hooked directly into my compressor, and the interface has a return, so it definitely gets the signal. My only guess is it really isn't sending a signal out. So far, it's kind of disappointing to cost so much. 😅
Forgive the dumb question, but you have the latest Universal Control (4.3) that updates the HD 8 to firmware version 1.61?
@OscarDanielGarza yea I believe but I'll double check
Hello! Something doesn't sound right here! Let's take a look -- can you please submit a ticket with your details so our support team can dive in and help resolve this for you?
You can do this here:
my.presonus.com
@@presonusyea you guys say something doesn't seem right let me tell u what you guys should have enough foresight to have seen .... if u don't bypass mixer u don't get anything but ins and 2 outs plus headphones
@@presonusyalls tech support is kind of like whom ever runs you tube comments but random nobody's from a forum saw the same as all presonus workers and fixed in 10 minutes lmao tickets still open with presonus 😅🤣🤣😅🤣🤣 talk about egg on your face
I'm disappointed that they didn't include built-in DSP for the mic inputs. I totally would've upgraded to this if they had. A shame.
This lack of a DSP is honestly inexplicable.
Dsp is old tech lmao and that's what dsp monitor mixing Is for 😅😅😅😂😂😂
@DropoutSound it has dsp just not on inputs 😅😅😅😅
@@harpoleon6806 DSP effects on inputs (comp, reverb, delay, chorus) are essential IMO for recording vocals realtime, without hearing delays from the DAW. For example, the Revelator series (that I own) offers these DPS effects, although unfortunately the drivers are still bugged (especially their reverb). I hoped they would do something better in this series...
@DropoutSound hard to explain I may be confused but it adds the effects to the headphone mix 0 latency and it doesn't bake in I know whatever effects I had on didn't print but again I may be lost I know it's not like antelope interfaces or my old apollo but same effect if not printing it's more in tune with uad than antelope as I think I printed with antelope or maybe I didn't know how to use lol
Why would anyone using a previous quantum with thunderbolt 2-3 ever consider a usb-c model? As if a re-amp output and an auto-gain feature would ever make up for the increased latency usb-c brings. Quantum was supposed to be a flagship model interface. The Studio 1824c did everything this does minus auto-gain and re-amp yet, the new quantum costs 500 dollars more? Lol, Fender should stick with making guitars and keep out of the newly acquired Presonus camp. Just my thoughts.
Or they just decided to add USB variants to an existing product series, to expand the brand. I keep seeing this overreaction from people and it's annoyingly short sighted.
@kvltst they b acting like presonus is holding them at gunpoint telling them to buy this. If they like the old one then they can stick with it
Lmao Thunderbolt vs usb c yea those 2 ms really kills their vibes right lmao 🤣 😂 😆 they haven't looked at converters or dynamic range or anything 😂 🤣 😅 I'm dead
@kvltst you see how u said minus this is worth 500 dollars lmao tell me what price u put on the new features and just cause you Ferrari can do 300mph how often do u drive at 300 mph that's probably why it's usb c they realized they could give the same quality with a smaller engine
@@kvltst "The Studio 1824c did everything this does minus auto-gain and re-amp yet, the new quantum costs 500 dollars more? " And you feel this is a good idea? To each his own.
Please make MADI or DANTE conection (or at least AVB). Stop duplicating all these old adat interfaces.
Anyway, I love your products and a big fan of a Studio One.
What about the latency? Nobody is talking about the latency for me. That’s very important for the Guitar. Usually I’m getting about 10 minutes seconds guys compare this new quantum to old one please with the latency of course thanks.
Hopefully some people will post real world measurements soon, but from what is reported in a DAW, it's about 4 ms at 32 sample / 48 kHz and about 3 ms at 32 sample / 96 kHz. Going to depend on your computer too and which model of Quantum (ES or HD).
Oscar's comment is correct here!