F-35 vs S-400
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 авг 2017
- Two of the most advanced war fighting platforms currently operations. Each designed to fight the other. Who wins?
I started a merch store. Get cool products & help support the channel!
teespring.com/stores/covertcabal
For business inquiries/sponsorships - gregr1251@gmail.com
If you'd like to help support me continue to create videos, you can do so here...
Patreon (Monthly) - / covertcabal
PayPayl (One Time Donations) - www.paypal.me/covertcabal
Discord - / discord
Amazon Prime 30 Free Trial - amzn.to/2AiNfvJ
Microphone I use = amzn.to/2zYFz1D
Video Editor = amzn.to/2JLqX5o
Military Aircraft Models = amzn.to/2A3NPxu
Military Strategy Book = amzn.to/2AaqwST
-----------------------------
Credits:
Footage:
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
The NATO Channel
Department of Defense (US)
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
Music:
BTS Prolog - Kevin MacLeod - incompetech.com
I really like the word of wisdom in the beginning "single F-35 vs single S-400 is unrealistic"
It is
Exactly. More to the point an attack on an S400 site would most likely involve many types of systems simultaneously, with stealth aircraft coming in behind. The concept in taking down any air defense system is to quickly overwhelm it and destroy it before it can be relocated.
Edit: overlapping defense is by nature staggered giving offensive planning an advantage in when and where they strike.
G@@deathguppie
@@deathguppie
You sure you can carry more missile in the air than your opponent in the ground?
Ordering them right now on amazon
We(India) did ordered s 400
Would be useful for the police helicopter
@Forrest Gump we love TOYS Like S400 , F22 , Rafael
@@Raaj913 Sukhoi M30 , Mig series...Add these also.
@@basil93 yes bro
This comment section is more competitive than S400 VS F35.
This video is obsolete.
@@noxDOTevolvedDOTgmaiexactly. We now know how to beat the S400 and have the tech to do it.
I'm sure I'm not alone in saying this: Your channel is informative and non sensational (not click bait), thanks, great work. And thanks for a real human voice!
ꯗꯦ ꯑꯅꯤ ꯒꯤꯆꯇꯦꯔ ꯖꯦꯠ ꯑꯟꯗ ꯑꯗꯣꯃꯤ ꯀꯤꯠꯇꯤꯪ ꯑꯟꯗ ꯑꯟꯅꯨ ꯁꯦꯔꯦ ꯗꯦꯕꯅꯤ ꯀꯥꯔ ꯁꯛꯗ ꯍꯥꯏꯟ ꯫ ꯅ.ꯏ.ꯂ.ꯠ.꯫ ꯃꯩꯇꯩ꯫꯫꫰:
I think it's explanatory
and nonsense ........videos based on manufacturers CLAIMS , and the S 400 is russian so all the claims are shit
I think this will never end...
Technology then anti for that technology then another technology for that anti technology and so on and so on
shhh dont disclose the business strategy. 😂
I have a rock, you have a bigger rock. I have a stick, you have a longer stick. I have a spear that can go 20 feet, you create a lighter one that can reach 50 feet. It will NEVER end.
Ehtisham Siddiqui It’s basically what I’ve been saying the Cold War technically never ended
Lol so true
Well yeah this new tech... Welll WE got this new tech ... It never ends.... As humans we are still a bit primal so this may be a problem untill our apocalypse .... We haven't put nukes away fully and lets all remember those are the biggest punch in the fight :o
RUclips experts knows more than the scientists that built the systems.
You see
Yup, that often is the case, because an engineer might know a lot of technical details about its missile, but often they know remarkably little when it comes to its application.
@Miqdaad Indori Because maybe I'm a senior engineer? To a layman, a statement: "I was part of a team which helped to develop F-35 plane" might sound impressive. However, modern technologies are so ridiculously complex that we have engineers and scientists who can work on system in question and have no clue about it. For example, what a radio specialist can help develop radio communication for this plane. However, his work might be little different than making just another type of radio and he will just fiddle with his transistors and antenas. He might know a lot about F-35 radio, but it does not mean that he knows anything about plane itself. Or here is another example, what a guy which was responsible for putting tires on a plane knows about its performance? It might sound silly, but in real world people are just that much specialized in their task. A maintenance crew will not be briefed on plane's capabilities nor included in its testing.
@Miqdaad Indori You probably had misunderstood my first comment. I wasn't talking about companies at all, but rather individual fellows who work on such programs.
well said. experts!!! ;-))
A very nice video presentation.Keep up a very good work Covert!
Great video, excellent wortk. Thank you so much for sharing.
that is why you send in Rambo first before sending in the air fleet.
Add in Chuck Norris and the war is over.
Put a little of John Wick in there and the world would end
@@KitchenFSink also the dog
New Movie ruclips.net/video/WkgdEmpV4Ng/видео.html
rambo is too old buddy, tired and old.
14 years ago it was believed that F-35’s RCS was slightly inferior to that of F-22. Real world RCS testing revealed F-35 exceeding its RCS requirement. Since then, pilots and people having access to the program such as former commander of Air Combat Command, Gen. Hostage, points to the notion that F-35 is actually stealthier than F-22. So in worst case, let’s consider F-35’s RCS similar to the F-22 (i.e. “metal marble” = 0.0001 m^2)
91N6E is S-400’s primary Search radar. Based on public data, it can detect a normal fighter aircraft (RCS: 4 m^2) from 390 km maximum. Using radar equation, for F-35 (0.0001 m^2 RCS) this corresponds to
F35 Will destroyed
@@zeusson4425 Nah, in ukraine we will now see how good russian eguipitment really are.
I work for LM on F-35 project. The F-35's best application is LO "Low Observation" it's RCS is the size of a pea
Stealth isn't as clean cut as it sounds like. It doesn't make you invisible to the enemy, it just makes it harder to see you and buys you more time. There is always another frequency of radar detection or method to spotting stealth aircraft.
This comment is epic. Thank you for taking the time to write it for us civilians.
I recall a few years back it was claimed the Israeli's flew past the S300's undetected. Is that true?
Just found your channel. I think it's great. Well researched and informative. Thanks!
It's actually quite informative reading the comments. Even though people end up fighting, the comments in these videos always end up being more informative than the video itself.
Lets be honest who ever name this I.A.D.S wanted to name it A.I.D.S but realised the name was not the best
My first thought was that they were great lads lol.
Yeah only dumb folks like you can imagine such idiotic stuff ^^
It has been proved S-300/400 don't work (they work only on Russian TV or Russian TV channels like here) over 5 S-300 been destroyed in past month (videos can be found on RUclips) by Azerbaijani drones
Nope. Idiot.
@@MidwestDIY yeah, sure! As you say!
Informative&objective as always, keep up the good work!
Really good video. Great explanation. Very cool.
Dude well done, great and objective video!!! I loved it!
Slobodan Buncic kastraveca sto bace mou .’ 👄👄👄👄👄🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖
Slobodan Buncic 🇮🇹🇲🇨🇺🇸🇷🇺🇬🇱🇬🇧🇩🇰🏴🇦🇷🇦🇼
WELL, this didn't age well.
Will post review of s400 soon. still testing this bad boy
Just hope the it can tell the difference between an F-35 & a Malyasian airliner !!!
ꯁꯥ400 ꯎꯞ ꯒꯔ꯭ꯦꯁꯇ꯭ ꯀꯔꯅꯥ ꯍꯥ 500 ꯃꯤꯁꯁꯤꯂꯦ ꯀꯥ ꯖꯔꯨꯔꯗ ꯍꯥꯏꯟ ꯌꯨꯝ ꯃꯂꯨꯝ ꯅꯥꯍꯤꯟ ꯀꯤꯌꯥ ꯅ.ꯏ.ꯊꯨꯝꯄ:-
You got nothing posted! 8 month of reviewing! What can it do?
@Thor the Creator Yeah...also kinda like the Russian AF shooting down South Korean flight 007 ..Only unlike the Iranian flight... the Korean shoot down was NOT an accident..
@Thor the Creator ohhh so did that justify Russia shooting down a civilian 747 and killing all on board ??? Just cause it stayed off course . WTFU..The yanks did fuck up ..yeah they tought the Iranian airliner was an incoming F-14 about to attack..But they got it wrong and it happened over international waters..The iranians at time were targeting foreign oil tankers in The gulf. The Iranians can't talk anyway ..they shot down an airliner last year and denied it for a period...then admitted it..There has been alot more fuck ups on the Russian side..
Very good analysis nice job don't let trashy comments get to you did great bro keep it up
Very well explained.
Who is watching after Russia delivered Turkey first hardware of s400 missile system.
ahvalnews.com/turkey-us/pentagon-takes-steps-replace-turkey-f-35-programme-sanctions-loom
Pentagon takes steps to replace Turkey in F-35 program.
Turkey needs Defence system and no fucking Country out there to say bullshit This is Turkey they will do what they did it 100 years ago
Karl Hans s200 removes f35 😂
the world is fucked.... tensions keep growing and aren’t getting any looser ww3 is on the horizon fellas proxy wars we see now are just the beginning
@@bigchungus3429
Don't be scared . It is the time to desttoy US and make the world peaceful place.
You might want to think about purchasing Spear Capability 3. It's essentially a powered SDB II. You could launch them from low altitude using terrain masking and have them arrive near simultaneously on target from multiple directions. That would be a very hard capability to counter. Your EA-18Gs can also launch AARGMs at geolocated targets using GSP/INS or pure INS guidance, using its MMW terminal seeker in GPS denied environments. JASSM and JASSM-ER are other good candidates against geolocated S-400s.
MALD decoys, along with a little jamming + the now operational CHAMP (fries electronic equipment) missile should do the job. Next up, a barrage of stand-off missiles like the Tomahawk & JASSM.
Thanks for the review 👍
I think I'll purchase it ....
Nice analysis
The biggest problem facing long-range air defense systems is dealing with hostile objects from a short distance because the defense missile is not designed for high maneuvers, but rather is designed to launch with increasing speed to the hostile target from a long distance. Therefore, all air defense systems rely on a multi-wavelength radar system to detect hostile targets. It has a low radar section from a distance so that it can hit it from a distance.
And don't simply forget that the S400s are also protected by Tor, Tor m1, Tor m2, Tor m3,
Tunguskas, Pantsir, Buk m1 Buk m2 and Buk m3 as well.
Anthony Quainoo not necesarily, depending on if it is area protection or brigade anti-air
Also karasukha 4 ecm to jam anything in area of 300km and passive radar to detect type of plateform flying in a particuler range
Youre acting like it would be all of those systems at once. Lol half of those do the same thing or are upgrades of each other you obviously don't know what you're talking about
it would be almost impossible to reach the defense group, who guard the s400
☠️
Good information.
Was waiting for this important video. Pls make how to track and shoot down an icbm. Can icbm be shot down. How. Also provide information on defence against icbm. What is jamming and other terms that you used.
The new Arrgam-er for the f-35 uses a ramjet which lets it reach up to mach 3. It's like a brahmos missile which can track radars and be carried by the F-35.
It has range of 300km. though they probably are not going to use these 300km range but firing them at a distance of 150km because of the stormbreaker glide bombs that protect the Arrgm-er from beeing shot down
Here is a better idea America, how about leave other countries alone and don't go bomb them...
Meh. I could agree with this.
You really believe that? Not only that Gadaffi didn't murder his population, he gave them everything! Free healthcare, scholarship, 50,000 dollars for their first house without returning the money, they had everything and fell for your bullshit "freedom" story, now they have nothing! And you backed out and left them fucked up and swarming with Ansar al sharia terrorists. Before you fucked him up and Saddam, there was no terrorists cells, Gadaffi, Saddam and Assad held all those fucktards under the boot if there was some. Why not go to Nigeria and fight Boko Haram, they're killing civilians, why? Because Nigera does not have anything worth fighting for. Unlike the previous 3.
High Overlord Snarffie Beagle Even if that really happens, are you sure not getting hurt emotionally is more important than having your country lose american lives and taxpayer money?
If only things were that simple.
Bo Han well said it, I agree with you 100%
Awesome explanation
Very good video.
If both side have fair quality weapons, it depends on tactics and industrial production to quantity (numbers), the WWII has proven this.
Not to mention the presence of pantsir to shoot those tomahawk
This aged poorly (though i admit i believed it myself, 4 years ago)
Pantsir can't even protect S-400 from the archaic Neptune missile - as the Ukrainians proved. If it can't beat a single Neptune, then it can't beat 50 Blk V Tomahawks.
Que honradez del sitio, hablan con la verdad, animo sigan así
Brilliant!!
I felt the video was completely unbiased and had a multidimensional approach.
Also, launching tomahawk will need AC, will invite similar defensive or offensive measures.
Just like the old legend says, the race between sword and shield never ends.
It can lock you from 400 kilometers so basically you can target any any aircraft right from take off
It can't lock onto an F-35, Never has and never will.
@@GregHakes like the f117 right? It was so stealth that eventually it was shot down ...
@@theopot5798 The F-117 was shot down because the U.S. got careless. They kept flying in the same exact path, and the Syrian army commander found out about it and went and fined tuned the Radar to focus on one small area and they finally got one kill after 2,300 successful sorties by the U.S. So i wouldn't be too proud of that. LOL.
@@GregHakes I don't care if it was wrong , It was shot down , calm down with excuses , If you mess with a country bringing the country to their turf , your trops are likely to return back in coffins , Vietnam , Afganistan , Somalia etc..
It would be a lot more than a dozen aircraft. You'd have F22 or F15Ex flying CAP, FA18G and Es doing SEAD with HARMs and part of the strike, the F35s would be likely main strike group with the SDBs.
5:35 and on the way back to the base, there might be no base left to land.
No robot voice today...
Thank god...
This channel never does robovoice, you are thinking of CCP trolls trying to hide their accents
The voice looks like its over a radio so its cool. Not robot
So why would we attack Russia at this point?
USA has been exploiting Russian Sam systems since the 60s
Great videoa 👍👍 greating from georgia ❤️
We bout to see in like two weeks
Great video
By the time F-35 is ready for S-400 they'll employ S-500.
All the fighter jet class which represented by letter "F"( unlike the bomber class )are built to be small size & supersonic fast mainly for useless fuel wastine & even non logic dog fighting
an only 3 hour flying time aircraft with an avionics defendant pilot's human error & human health complications..Also blind because of his supersonic speed that generate a gigantic air pressure (or vacuum in the backside ) need only a small scratch ( not even a hole ) done by a small bullet in dog-fighting to pop that expensive aircraft .. the dog-fighting is what the fighter jet class is mainly designed to do .. who need to dog fight when you can track & hunt your enemy from any direction with any AI seek & destroy air/air missile like python 5 example :
- The Maximum load of F22 (not F35) is 8 short range AIM Anti aircraft only rockets (a great example of fighters or"F" class narrow role) (that is it 8 without adding any other load like fuel tanks or additional spying avionics) each one of those AIM missiles cost at least $300,000-$400,000 USD & they still need an additional IR or active radar targeting systems on the plane to correct their route
- In the F-117 they sacrified the supersonic speed engine & all the jet ordinary armament even the classic machine guns with only two 934 to 954 kg blast/fragmentation or penetration bomb... this the whole load .. 2 bombs less than a ton ( less than a small van wight) .. no engaging or even self defenses at all in this "fighter".. It is likely should considered as a very small bomber rather than a fighter jet . With these design considerations , no afterburner & with only 2 × General Electric F404-F1D2 turbofans .. this fighter "jet !" maximum speed at the highest performance was only Mach 0.92 ...without counting the trust/load wight plenty which was 40% (0.4) their point was that the stealthily faceted air frame required a large amount of maintenance & stealth highly expensive martial covering the F-117 body make no need for all of that ... it seems like desperate Lockheed Corporation realized how expensive useless & even non logic of the supersonic dog fighting .. so they tried to twist the concept somehow to keep their military customers .. after all they tried .. but stleth powers was crushed when One F-117 (AF ser. no. 82-0806) was lost to enemy action. It was downed during a mission against the Army of Yugoslavia on 27 March 1999, during Operation Allied Force. At approximately 8:15 pm local time, the aircraft was acquired by a fire control radar at a distance of 13 km and an altitude of 8 km: SA-3s were then launched by a Yugoslav version of the Soviet Isayev S-125 "Neva" (NATO name SA-3 "Goa") anti-aircraft missile system Photos show that the aircraft struck the ground at low speed in an inverted position, and that the airframe remained relatively intact.[53] The Serbs invited Russian personnel to inspect the aircraft's remains, compromising the then 25-year-old U.S. stealth technology ... The stealth technology from the downed F-117 may have been acquired by Russia and China ... thanks to fighter class useless dog fighting body design .. Some American sources state that a second F-117A was damaged during the same campaign, allegedly on 30 April 1999;[63] the aircraft returned to base, but it supposedly never flew again .. The loss in Serbia caused the USAF to create a subsection of their existing weapons school to improve tactics. More training was done with other units, and the F-117A began to participate in Red Flag exercises. Though advanced for its time, the F-117's stealthy faceted airframe required a large amount of maintenance .. The Air Force had once planned to retire the F-117 in 2011, but Program Budget Decision 720 (PBD 720), dated 28 December 2005, proposed retiring it by October 2008 .. PBD 720 called for 10 F-117s to be retired in FY2007 and the remaining 42 in FY2008, stating that other Air Force planes and missiles could stealthily deliver precision ordnance, including the B-2 Spirit, F-22 and JASSM.[68] The planned introduction of the multi-role F-35 Lightning II also contributed to the retirement decision .. this is destiny of any aircraft built on useless non logic dog-fighting .
The last F-117 (AF Serial No. 86-0831) left Palmdale to fly to Tonopah on 11 August 2008. With the last aircraft retired, the 410th was inactivated in a ceremony on 1 August 2008
The F-35 program has been plagued by cost overruns and delays, has been grounded twice, and even has been criticized by those within the Pentagon. The $1.5 trillion that will be spent on this wasteful Pentagon program is an enormous sum. It is equivalent to the cost of the sequester.not
www.cnn.com/2017/06/09/politics/f-35-grounded-oxygen-problems/index.html
the future is for UAVs which already done outrageous successful missions in Iraq & Afghanistan 100 times more than the classical aircraft are already not only replaced those classical old style dog fighting fighters jets ( the letter "F" refer to the fighter class ) but also got more & more great advantages & more new roles every single year .... there is no way to compare between an only 3 hour flying time aircraft with an avionics defendant pilot's human error & human health complications
the AI in the USA long range missiles lunched over Iraq in 1990 was programmed to read the landscape features like mountains, rivers to reach its target accurately with no need of any direction or communications with its base or even global satellites ... unlike the avionics dependent blind supersonic commanding only pilots. The AI reflexes, reactions, skills , roles , information analysis , flight time.. etc has no limitations & could be upgraded easily than expensive training human pilots for years until his maximum retire age 35 years .. with complete health condition examination every 6 months .. Blind enough to use autopilot even over 18000 feet in the civil air-crafts .. compare all of that to highly accurate reflecting AI
the F35 that raided Damascus the protecting fortress against ISIS was severely damaged
southfront.org/syrian-military-claims-1-israeli-warplane-shot-down-after-strikes-against-targets-in-syria/
@Al Castill please tell us when did the NATO forces wiped out the serbian Air defense in the 1999 campaign. I will tell you. It did not. The Serbian AA's remained a threat until the end of the bombings.
The S-500 is not an upgrade of the S-300/400. It is a separate ABM platform that is very similar to the American THAAD platform. They are meant to work in tandem, but perform different tasks. The S-500 is not designed to shoot down manned aircraft.
@@thusarix121 - And if any American pilots using first-gen stealth platforms decide against staggering their bombing runs, they will be at risk of getting shot down. Except there *are no* first-gen stealth platforms still flying, and that Serbian shoot-down led to significant increases in weapons delivery tech and the development of new tactics to ensure that the plane can avoid being painted while its bays are open. Judging current stealth technology from a single incident in 1999 during which the pilot made an error is just plain ignorant.
As far as I know the S-300 and S-400 have never been proved in action against advanced fighters and have scored rather dubious achievements in Syria.
Coordinated strikes, using Artillery alongside Aircraft, can also work against IADS, assuming you can get the artillery in position.
Yeah if u spot it xd
S-400 isn’t something that is deployed within artillery range.
Great work a cup of tea for you
5:12 there is 5 system protecting the s400 : pantisr s1 buk m2 s300v4 s300pmu so s300 v4 has the biggest range and it would dedect the f 35 like from 690km away they would be ready
Your missiles would be ABM (anti-ballistic missile) targets for F-35. F-35 is not F-16 with stealth.
No under the S400 radar detection range is 26km engagement is 14km, without any EW from f35 which would reduce th at range even closer! How much, no one here knows but Lockheed's and highly ranked generals m!
Air combat, you scary!
Im Keepin my boots on the ground .
Whilst they drop bombs on your head.
Marth667 And without boots on the ground, the Air force can’t actually take territory. Both are needed
Bro....m from India....& m always in search of military aircraft technology that is used by United States Air Force & The Russian Air Force...The names of these two countries always makes me recall the SPACE RACE they began back then in 1960s & the MOON LANDINGS.........The technological approach to combat air warfare of both these countries inspires me a lot & makes a rush of adrenaline in me......but m a huge fan of your channel......terrific information.......very inspirational.....👍👍👍👍👍👍
Defense can do some, none or all of the following. three things. Direct the enemy to where you want them; Deter the enemy from taking actions you don't want them to take and; Delay the enemy in achieving their goals.
This music gives me the feeling that WW3 is already going on...
LOL!😄
@Mail Fraud clone wars for alien invention demonized miracle aviation
In the Vietnam war, Vietnamese had shot down thousands U.s planes and helicopters by Soviet weapons and arrested many U.S pilots.
In the Philippines, they housed, helped. Taught thousands of Vietnamese (boat people) the western ways before migrating to the US. Philippines wad their staging points before the U.S. took them to America.
YOU NEVER HEARD A SINGLE VIETNAMESE SAY Thank you philippines !
thank you Philippines
I like watching how the S300/400 launches out of its canisters
Every time you mention the Growler aircraft, it makes me laugh as "growler" is a nickname for a ladies front bottom in my Country, England. 😉
russia has the best air defence system in the world
look at Syrian bombing by America .the s400 couldn't do anything look at the devastation US bombings caused. Russian power is just a way to sell weapons. That's all
Tanvir Ahmed is not true russia is bubble
Чтобы он стрелял нужна была политическая воля - которой не было.
так С-400 и не стрелял
สวัสดีคับผมวีแล้นไทยไลย์สายพันธุ์ใหม่คับผม
So, in conclusion, the F-35 and the S-400 are so evenly matched that they work better as detterrents than they ever could in action.
What? No.
The F-35, given current information, can outrange the S-400 by avoiding detection, launching glide bombs that the S-400 cannot intercept.
In Conclusion, the F-35 can defeat the S-400.
The SAM that keep failing to shoot down missile vs the jet fighter that keep randomly crashing
We also can use a weapon thats been around since WW2 to take out Sam Sites,a little thing called Special Forces :P
F 35 is a passenger aircraft....and its inhuman to shoot down any of them......
hahahaha good one you made me lol
do you have toilets?
+Constantin Raileanu u wanna eat that shit
wash yourself.
nope i pop on your face....
The F-35 is so advanced that while its idle,
internal AI does crosswords puzzles and guess user's "quick, draw" paintings.
Lmao
Somebody once told me -the world is gonna roll me- to shoot down an aircraft, you need to be tracking it on radar from the time the missile is launched until impact, which is very difficult to do when fighting a stealth aircraft. A supersonic stealth aircraft makes that even harder.
Use a disposable artillery system. Air drop a Howitzer close enough to bombard it with about 5 to 10 Magazine. Use a drone to spot the SAM system. Use a helicopter to move the Howitzer.
Howitzer have a range betwen 45-55,km. Witch altitude helicopter must to fly, to avoid s400, when s400 have a range 400 km? 50cm above the ground?
this is so relevant in Turkey right now....
Along with the Defensive S-400 come the MIG's which you've left out of the equation.
That's not what the video is about. It's about s400 vs f35. You want to include other shit on the russian side, then you gotta factor in other stuff on the us side
@@cameronspence4977
Tes obèses signeraient leur perte s 'ils osaient faire la guerre a la Russie !
@@cameronspence4977 all the US can do is diss the russians on the internet
@@MrRasZee lmao we would kick the dog shit out of them ass🤡 but don't let reality get in the way of your fantasy
The stealth FC-31B with the WS-15 engines can super cruised without afterburner.The FC-31 has terahertz radar that can see the vF-35.The FC-31 has four PL-21 that flies at mach 6 speed with a range of 300 miles.
Idk how this is relevant but that aircraft is years away from being made it doesn't even exist yet, the range is way less than advertised on their missiles as an intimidation tactic, AND that range is against large nonstealthy targets it can't even hit an f35
An important thing about "stealth" : 1) a ""stealth"" plane can avoid only some frequencies (low frequency radar are, today, effective against any plane) ; 2) a "stealth" plane can be detected by "passive" radar system, the f35 is already detected by the german firm "Hensoldt" passive radar (live test when f35 travel in germany)
You forgot to mention the "Pantsir" system, that protects those S400... =)
Loads of articles out there about Israeli F-35 going right through Syrian airspace . Plenty of operation photos out there showing the s400 and pantsir doing nothing while F-35 flew over .
@@Dr.Westside Do you really want them to shoot down those f35?
@@Dr.Westside because Russia is not focusing on Israel otherwise it can shoot them before they leave Israeli airspace
because they come in from behind the lebanon mountainrange and hide right there again immediately after the attack
@@bill4all782 Turkey shot pantsir too lmao 😂
Do they have to repaint the missiles after every use though?
Peter do you have to paint a car after every severe paint scratch?
Problem with air defence is they are limited if you get alot of missiles at you it won't hold as the missiles air defence has is limited...
Specially designed EMP cruise missile flying at low altitude less than a hundred feet off the ground comes through and basically wipes out all electronic capability end of first stage of Engagement.
The second stage of the engagement would be F-35 fly in and Destroy actual intended Target and then go home.
Sounds good 👍🤣
You haven't explained about f-35 stealth advantage
Because it no longer has one against the S400 ..the S400 has rendered the F35 null and void bud ..null and void also the F35 falls out of the sky and chokes its pilots out all on its own no S400 needed
I like it how easy in theory to just destroy radars and the Air defense systems before launching a real attack
Those missiles go so fast.
almost 3 miles per second. crazyfast
It’s a multi trillion dollar 💵 chess game with no reset button
War sucks butt it sure creates jobs
S300 is fake, it cant hit shit....worthless in Syria.
@@flipflop4396 especially when they're deactivated and engineers chilling out
It will create a lot of debt too. Our national debt has exceeded our gross domestic product. That means we are on our way towards insolvency. How many trillions of dollars do you think a war with Russia would cost?
@@flipflop4396 uh russians dont use their fancy stuff in syria. They are too expensive to lose.
You mean mostly profits for a few defences contractors. All those trillions of dollars could have been used to create better jobs and more of them. And those jobs would actually benefit every citizen too. Infrastructure, education, medicine, etc.
At last someone how has basic knowledge and logic, even if someone comes up with a better way of dealing with both, this is a solid review.
You forgot about satellites and recon aircraft that link to attacks from various cruise missles.
This has to be one of the most accurate and objective analyses of this part of the current arms race between the United States and the Russian Federation. Excellent work.
Marty how the F35 is supposed to have stealth technology , it’s not even discussed
@@iamasmurf1122 : it's roughly painted and shaped the same way as the F-22. It's not as good either I think.
True my guy, I don't even think F-35 Stealth could be actually better either
So when and where is the match?
Soon. and it is is Syria. Damascus is to become uninhabitable.
The best way to solve dont attack by air units😇
I'm here for the professional military comments and let's go!
its one of the reasons i clicked this video but who knows what countries are actually hiding. given the huge military budget the US has it wouldnt surprise they have a hidden weapon to take out Russia air defences
Now that missiles and torpedoes exist, no boat or airplane is safe.
No matter how strong your air defence system, there's always going to be someone who can attack you successfully ^^
Who asked
no matter how rich and modern your country are, you still lost to rice farmer
@@lilbiggie5691 rice farmers which was supported by Ivan and Ching cheng hanji
@@primalmonitor2527 nobody care who they got their support from what matter you're a super power have one of the best weapons tech and still lost to some rice farmer
oh yea they got support from the USSR and China that's the problem. Similar to the South Vietnam with support from the US. There are also some documents said that the PLA dressed as NVA soldiers and took part in the Vietnam War. Rice farmers lost 1,1 million soldiers and the US lost 58000 soldiers. If the US didn't abandone its ally then the North Vietnam would be destroyed already.
s400 is best
Legitimate question: Why would the F-35 use terrain masking when the S-400s maximum targeting range is reduced by the stealth features? Don’t misunderstand me, I’m not saying invisibility cloak, but doesn’t stealth technology in general mean aircraft would use terrain masking in fewer situations? RCS and detection is tied to your range from the radar array, and being at 50,000 ft with an RCS of a baseball is going to be more limiting for the high frequency targeting radar (not the search radar) than on the deck right? The low and fast tactical approach only came to light once missile ranges made high altitude bombers less feasible, wouldn’t a technology like stealth reaffirm high altitude strikes?
The problem with expensive complicated equipment is that it can’t be replaced quickly.
From what happened in Syria just recently, you wouldnt even need an s400 for a tomahawk. A regular BUK system would do just fine. Either way, it would cost the US to engage the S-400.
BUK is for missiles. S 400 is for aeroplanes.
Aliens: Look they have satellites.
Also aliens: Yeah but they are spying and facing each other.
Which one would you rely on to proterct your barn ?
the 35 and 22 hunt in wolf packs like world war 2.
I Will Say one thing...if you need to fly a conventional aircraft (f-15/16/18) next to the f35/22....what's the point of being "invisible" to the radars?...they will know you are comming anyway..
Specially if you have jammers whit you.
Because stealth is not about being invisible and never has been. Stealth is about being difficult to engage. The F-117A that was shot down in 1999 is actually a really good example. Despite being detected at around 35km the Serbian SAM failed to lock on to the F-117A twice, finally achieving a lock at a very short range of 15km.
Also, since the F-117A relied entirely on stealth to the point it didn't even have warning systems, it means the failure of the SAM site to engage at normal distances was entirely attributable to the stealth capability of the F-117A.
Regardless there is no need to fly "conventional" aircraft next to stealth aircraft.
F-22 vs S400 that what you should talk about.... but i think 70% of the technology on f22 is classified... so it's gonna be a lot harder to talk about
its a 90's tech, doesn't even have a HUD because of incompatibility with more modern system of F35's. F22 doesn't stand much chance either.
Besides the F-22 has been dropped from production years ahead of schedule because it fails to meet the needs. There are few spare parts remaining. The F-35 is crippled by laclk of parts so fully 1/3 of the entire fleet is on indefinite maintenance hold because parts have no schedule to be delivered for another 6 months. IF there was a war, and the sortie allowance of 1 per week, and no repairs in-theater, at the end of a month there would be no flying F-35 available. Every 20 hours of use it neeed extensive depot stealth coating application that takes a week or more. ...and that is in peacetime. In war when they are being shot at, no one can depend on them to be available. The can't even fly without control by AWACS and Russian missiles can wipe out every AWACS within 1500km
with 400 of the coolest air defense systems in the WORLD !!
You failed to mention that its takes 30 minutes to realod the missles, thats a long time in a war
Sure, but if you have enough missiles to take down all the aircraft on a carrier you know you're safe.
That Video is great! And thanks so mich for not using those stupid Computer voice almost everyone is using. ;)
assuming realistically were talking about syria, you would just need artilery and cruise missiles to take out the s-400 systems, radar, command posts, then you would use the f-35 to blow up everything else.
Damascus will become uninhabitable very soon. It's just a question of quantity of fun.
I don’t understand, aren’t flares used to avoid missiles anymore? So what’s the use when developing new anti air?
They need to equip them with emp missiles on.fighter jets put out defences