As I told you last time, this is the second episode of a "pilot" for the new side series where I delve into secrets of the Eurasian Steppe peoples. If this episode gains enough interest, I will make a fully-fledged series and continue with the Ashina wolf myth and the secrets hidden in the Orkhon Inscriptions. There are so much more mysterious topics to be covered, so we have more than enough things to talk about. This episode, though, was a fun thought experiment. I suppose producing a 21 minute long video out of one single line in a Chinese chronicle from 200 BC is quite the accomplishment. It's not my usual style, but I wanted to try out new styles. Hope you enjoy this one!
Would be very interested in a series about secrets of the Eurasian Steppe peoples. Have long had a question about the relationship of the Xiongnu and the Amanaya......??? Or do I have the time frames confused?
Ashína wolf turkic people ,the First Turkic Khaganat Emporium 551 A-D. by Bumin Khagan but the Orkhon stele made only in 631....the very first mentioning of turks.....
In a matter of decades Modu united all of eastern Inner Asia and created an empire larger than that of Alexander the Great. The standing army of the Xiongnu was also expanded to 300,000 men, now a match for the huge armies of Han China.
A video about Kama Tarkhan would be great to he's one of the lesser known Hunnic leaders despite his leadership of carrying the Turkic tribes to the Pontic steppe after his conquest of the Scythians
Modu Chanyu = Splinter Muqan, Attila, Chinggis, Lenin = Ninja Turtles. My respect to the master of the Eurasian plains and all the steppe lords he paved way for
Modu had also subjected an equally large empire of China to the payment of tribute. Modu was in many ways Alexander«s equal, maybe even superior when it comes to the extent of his conquests. The two rulers were also similar in that they were both suspected of having assassinated their fathers (Touman and Philip) in order to seize the throne. Modu, however, was clearly the more competent politician and administrator of the two.
I'm saving these videos to my computer so I can use them to put together the genealogical lines of my family history, especially those of my mother's side who I know absolutely came to Germany from the Tom River region. I have the history of the Israelites in Captivity to the 600s BC, I just need to fill in the next 1,000 yrs. My mother's maiden name is Hüner. To accomplish this goal, I desperately need your books and these videos. Please, don't stop making these videos ~ they'll make a great "movie" to illustrate my family history.
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about Ancient 209 BC warlord rule & warleader ( successful military...(Bagatur ) ..during Xiongnu turkik tribes empire expanded....thank you 🙏( Khan Den) channel for sharing this magnificent episode.
It seems that the disappearance of Modu Chanyu, the founder of the Xiongnu Empire, who was strange to political life, laid the foundation for a political tradition that lasted for more than two thousand years in the Turkic states. The medieval heritage books mention that the Turks did not accept that the ruler would continue to rule for a long time and that the period of rule did not exceed forty years. And even history books mention that there was a political tradition in the Khazar Empire that the ruler would not continue to rule for more than forty years and that if the ruler refused to abdicate, they would depose him or kill him. We find many evidences in general Turkic history about this political tradition: The Seljuk Sultan Kilij Arslan II, after a long period of rule, abdicated power to his sons. Some historical sources mention that the founder of the Ottoman state, Osman Ertugrul, abdicated power to his son Orhan. These ancient Turkic political traditions about choosing rulers such as the Khagan and the Khan and the like, and the advisory councils and setting a specific period of rule in a customary manner and the voluntary abdication of power laid the foundations that paved the way for the establishment of republics in the Turkic states. As for the ancient historical sources mentioned in this beautiful and enjoyable episode. It should be known that a complete and objective reading of ancient historical sources leads to accurate knowledge and broad knowledge. While an incomplete and biased reading of ancient historical sources leads to ignorance and backwardness. In this Chinese historical source about the Tiele people, it mentions very important historical details: "The Gaoche are probably remnants of the ancient Red Di. Initially they had been called Dili. Northerners take them as Chile. Chinese take them as Gaoche Dingling. Their language, in brief, and Xiongnu language are the same yet occasionally there are small differences. Or one may say that they Gaoche are the junior relatives of the Xiongnu in former times.". Analyzing this text covers a long historical period of more than one thousand and five hundred years. First: The Tiele people are linked to the Beidi people, whose roots go back to about a thousand years BC and who inhabited the Ordos Loop and northern China and founded the Zhongshan and Dai kingdoms. Second: It links the Tiele people with the Dingling, a large tribal confederation in the eastern steppes that played influential roles in the Xiongnu and Sixteen Kingdoms eras and fought against the Xianbe Confederation. Third: The text explicitly states that the Tiele language is the same as the Xiongnu, but there are slight differences in dialect, which indicates the diversity of Turkic dialects since an early period, more than two thousand years ago. Fourth: This is an important point that unfortunately many people do not pay attention to. The Chinese source states that the Tiele are minor relatives of the Xiongnu, which means that they belong to a larger Turkic group whose roots go back to the Stone Age, from which many branches descend.
There are many descendants of the Xiongnu Maodun. Some of them have integrated into the Han people, while others are unwilling to continue living on the pastures or move westward. The same is true for the Mongol rule in China. Some people have integrated into the Chinese Han people, while others are unwilling to continue living on the pastures or migrate in other directions. It’s just that Unwilling to integrate into the Han people, there are very few records about Mao Dun in history, because Mo Dun was unwilling to integrate into the Han people, and his descendants were unwilling to mention him. The Manchu-Mongolian alliance ruled the Han people, and many people were unwilling to integrate into the Han people. These people in China It's very good in the records, because there is nothing to say, there are two factions in the first place
Greetings from Colorado. Thank you for the series, it is very interesting and enlightening showing snippets missing by academics and historians. Could you do a video on the Gok Turks? As Osman Ghazi descendant I was always questioning some of the "conventional wisdom" of history. For example, who were the "Kinik" who later change their name to " Seljuk" and why ? Perhaps a video on those who later become Khazar and their relation with Bumin after he revolt against the Avars.
As I told you last time, this is the second episode of a "pilot" for the new side series where I delve into secrets of the Eurasian Steppe peoples. If this episode gains enough interest, I will make a fully-fledged series and continue with the Ashina wolf myth and the secrets hidden in the Orkhon Inscriptions. There are so much more mysterious topics to be covered, so we have more than enough things to talk about.
This episode, though, was a fun thought experiment. I suppose producing a 21 minute long video out of one single line in a Chinese chronicle from 200 BC is quite the accomplishment. It's not my usual style, but I wanted to try out new styles. Hope you enjoy this one!
Would be very interested in a series about secrets of the Eurasian Steppe peoples. Have long had a question about the relationship of the Xiongnu and the Amanaya......??? Or do I have the time frames confused?
Ashína wolf turkic people ,the First Turkic Khaganat Emporium 551 A-D. by Bumin Khagan but the Orkhon stele made only in 631....the very first mentioning of turks.....
@@tenzingngedon3502 thank you!
In a matter of decades Modu united all of eastern Inner Asia and created an empire larger than that of Alexander the Great. The standing army of the Xiongnu was also expanded to 300,000 men, now a match for the huge armies of Han China.
A video about Kama Tarkhan would be great to he's one of the lesser known Hunnic leaders despite his leadership of carrying the Turkic tribes to the Pontic steppe after his conquest of the Scythians
That's an interesting biography for sure. If you can provide me with some more info, we'll get it done!
Modu Chanyu = Splinter
Muqan, Attila, Chinggis, Lenin = Ninja Turtles. My respect to the master of the Eurasian plains and all the steppe lords he paved way for
Lenin ????
Modu had also subjected an equally large empire of China to the payment of tribute. Modu was in many ways Alexander«s equal, maybe even superior when it comes to the extent of his conquests. The two rulers were also similar in that they were both suspected of having assassinated their fathers (Touman and Philip) in order to seize the throne. Modu, however, was clearly the more competent politician and administrator of the two.
Great. Thanks from Brazil and for subs in portuguese.
Teşekkürler Emre
I'm saving these videos to my computer so I can use them to put together the genealogical lines of my family history, especially those of my mother's side who I know absolutely came to Germany from the Tom River region. I have the history of the Israelites in Captivity to the 600s BC, I just need to fill in the next 1,000 yrs. My mother's maiden name is Hüner. To accomplish this goal, I desperately need your books and these videos. Please, don't stop making these videos ~ they'll make a great "movie" to illustrate my family history.
Great video, again... Well done Emre Hoca
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about Ancient 209 BC warlord rule & warleader ( successful military...(Bagatur ) ..during Xiongnu turkik tribes empire expanded....thank you 🙏( Khan Den) channel for sharing this magnificent episode.
Modu or Matur in Chuvash is translated as Well done. Or another translation from Chinese Pator is translated as Bogatyr.
Yeah yeah ...smh
It seems that the disappearance of Modu Chanyu, the founder of the Xiongnu Empire, who was strange to political life, laid the foundation for a political tradition that lasted for more than two thousand years in the Turkic states.
The medieval heritage books mention that the Turks did not accept that the ruler would continue to rule for a long time and that the period of rule did not exceed forty years.
And even history books mention that there was a political tradition in the Khazar Empire that the ruler would not continue to rule for more than forty years and that if the ruler refused to abdicate, they would depose him or kill him.
We find many evidences in general Turkic history about this political tradition:
The Seljuk Sultan Kilij Arslan II, after a long period of rule, abdicated power to his sons.
Some historical sources mention that the founder of the Ottoman state, Osman Ertugrul, abdicated power to his son Orhan.
These ancient Turkic political traditions about choosing rulers such as the Khagan and the Khan and the like, and the advisory councils and setting a specific period of rule in a customary manner and the voluntary abdication of power laid the foundations that paved the way for the establishment of republics in the Turkic states.
As for the ancient historical sources mentioned in this beautiful and enjoyable episode.
It should be known that a complete and objective reading of ancient historical sources leads to accurate knowledge and broad knowledge.
While an incomplete and biased reading of ancient historical sources leads to ignorance and backwardness.
In this Chinese historical source about the Tiele people, it mentions very important historical details:
"The Gaoche are probably remnants of the ancient Red Di. Initially they had been called Dili. Northerners take them as Chile. Chinese take them as Gaoche Dingling. Their language, in brief, and Xiongnu language are the same yet occasionally there are small differences. Or one may say that they Gaoche are the junior relatives of the Xiongnu in former times.".
Analyzing this text covers a long historical period of more than one thousand and five hundred years.
First: The Tiele people are linked to the Beidi people, whose roots go back to about a thousand years BC and who inhabited the Ordos Loop and northern China and founded the Zhongshan and Dai kingdoms.
Second: It links the Tiele people with the Dingling, a large tribal confederation in the eastern steppes that played influential roles in the Xiongnu and Sixteen Kingdoms eras and fought against the Xianbe Confederation.
Third: The text explicitly states that the Tiele language is the same as the Xiongnu, but there are slight differences in dialect, which indicates the diversity of Turkic dialects since an early period, more than two thousand years ago.
Fourth: This is an important point that unfortunately many people do not pay attention to.
The Chinese source states that the Tiele are minor relatives of the Xiongnu, which means that they belong to a larger Turkic group whose roots go back to the Stone Age, from which many branches descend.
There are many descendants of the Xiongnu Maodun. Some of them have integrated into the Han people, while others are unwilling to continue living on the pastures or move westward. The same is true for the Mongol rule in China. Some people have integrated into the Chinese Han people, while others are unwilling to continue living on the pastures or migrate in other directions. It’s just that Unwilling to integrate into the Han people, there are very few records about Mao Dun in history, because Mo Dun was unwilling to integrate into the Han people, and his descendants were unwilling to mention him. The Manchu-Mongolian alliance ruled the Han people, and many people were unwilling to integrate into the Han people. These people in China It's very good in the records, because there is nothing to say, there are two factions in the first place
Greetings from Colorado. Thank you for the series, it is very interesting and enlightening showing snippets missing by academics and historians. Could you do a video on the Gok Turks? As Osman Ghazi descendant I was always questioning some of the "conventional wisdom" of history. For example, who were the "Kinik" who later change their name to " Seljuk" and why ?
Perhaps a video on those who later become Khazar and their relation with Bumin after he revolt against the Avars.
Such a good video👍
devam böyle❤🇹🇷❤️🇹🇷
Could you cover the Yamnaya and Genghis Khan, mongol empire and the impact of the nomadic empires.
He got joe bidened