The Most Dominant Winners in Survivor History
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 авг 2024
- With Survivor airing for over 20 years across multiple countries there are going to be questionable winners, middle tier winners, but, in a certain category, the highest prestige in my opinion are the most dominant winners. This is the gold standard; people that pushed their foot down on the pedal and quite frankly never let go of the steering wheel.
The 10 WORST Twists in Survivor History: • Top 10 WORST Twists Yo...
5 Times Professions FAILED on Survivor: • 5 Times Professions FA...
Five Survivor Contestants That Argued With Production Twists: • Five Survivor Contesta...
Do you have a video idea? You could get a shout out by filling in this short form!
forms.gle/p7qpYs9HeD4bnN7p7
Twitter: Bandit-Survivor Content
Discord: Bandit_2002
E-Mail: Bandit080102@gmail.com
0:00 Intro
0:30 Tommy Sheehan
3:00 Earl Cole
5:10 SURVIVOR SOUTH AFRICA
6:50 Rob Marianno
8:30 Considerations
9:50 Kim Spradlin
The Bandit Survivor channel features Survivor content from around the word: Survivor US, Australian Survivor, Survivor South Africa, Survivor New Zealand, Survivor UK and other forms of Survivor content such as Discord Survivor.
Music Used: Joakim Karud - Rock Angel:
ᕗ www.joakimkarud.com/
ᕗ / joakimkarud
ᕗ / joakimkarud
"Survivor" is a popular reality television show that has been captivating audiences around the world for many years. The show's concept revolves around a group of contestants, often around 16 to 20 individuals, who are marooned in a remote and challenging location, such as an island, jungle, or desert. These contestants are usually divided into two or more tribes at the beginning of the game.
The primary goal of the show is for contestants to outwit, outplay, and outlast their fellow competitors in order to win a cash prize and the title of "Sole Survivor." The show is known for its compelling characters, dramatic twists, and strategic gameplay. Contestants often face physical hardships, interpersonal conflicts, and moral dilemmas as they navigate the challenges of the game. "Survivor" has a loyal fan base and has spawned numerous seasons, each set in a different location with its own unique challenges. It has become a cultural phenomenon and a cornerstone of the reality TV genre. The host is known as Jeff Probst and is also the lead director.
#survivor #survivor45 #survivor2023
Keywords:
Survivor, Survivor Winners, Survivor 2023, Survivor 2024, Survivor US, Survivor CBS, CBS 
Развлечения
JOIN THE BANDIT SURVIVOR DISCORD SERVER TODAY!
discord.com/invite/hRbRCQNu
Tina's game in Australia is soo underrated. She devoured
I am SO glad you included Tommy on this list.
Spoilers for Australian Survivor:
I agree that Tommy (S39) is one of the most dominant winners, and his game only gets better once you hear interviews from the cast and how he had at least five people thinking he was their number one ally. I also have a ton of respect for Earl's game. But David Genat's game in Australian Survivor All-Stars should totally be in the top five. The average US survivor winner goes to 10.4 tribals, but he went to 16 tribals, made insane moves, and got only two votes before FTC, one of which was nullified.
Kim’s case so unique isn that almost every capable player is taken out by her as early as possible.
-Kat vs Nina she takes Kat cause she’s younger and more naive making it easier to use her to further her own game
-Jonas tries to regroup the men and uses her swap tribe+original tribe to gun him down immediately
-Sweet talks Troy into taking out Mike who could have mobilized a resistance
By the time Troyzan even realizes he’s on the bottom there’s literally nothing he can do about it outside of immunity win form Final 9 onwards.
Bonus points on her for taking Chelsea and Sabrina to the end over Alicia who might have turned on her at final 4 assuming she doesn’t win it.
Chelsea wasn’t respected and Sabrina had some support but nowhere near enough to win
She was a brilliant player.
It's good to see you back! Thank you for this amazing video ♥️ it is clear you put a lot of effort into it!
It depends how you define dominance.
Boston Rob- in terms of controlling votes he would be top 6 in dominance. He loses a jury vote to all but 2 people (the 2 he was at the end with) who made the merge though, which is the opposite of dominance. He was also targetted by the minority alliance, and goes home at Final 5 and Final 4 without his immunity idol and immunity most likely, which again is the opposite of dominance.
Tommy Sheehan- He was in serious danger of going home in the swap tribe vote. Granted he did well to survive this at all, but this is the opposite of dominance. He also loses a jury vote to 3 of the final 6 in the game- Janet, Elaine, and Lauren. He also wasn't exactly controlling the votes a lot of the way. So the only sense he was dominant was not being a target despite being a big threat nearly the whole game, minus the swap tribe vote.
The argument for Tony's WaW win is that he did it, almost flawlessly, against the most stellar cast of any season. Can't say the same for Rob or Kim's wins.
Youre becoming my favorite Survivor content creator. Your takes feel fresh and I like the way you explain things.
5:20 - welp. Guess it's time to watch some Survivor South Africa. Himbos don't exist in the American series anymore.....
It's easy to dominate when you cast is AWFUL Kim's win is really good but super overrated
Yeah Kim cried because she can't manipulate someone who win the game in WAW LOL .
Laughable you point that out for Kim but not for Rob on RI when the cast is even more horrific than One World. Or not for Tommy on Island of Idols which was also a garbage cast, nearly on part with One World.
@@travisstrong5389 i feel the exact same way about the redemption island cast on top of it being robs 4th time as for IOI the cast came to play unfortunately there was an icky dan spilo shaped turd on the island that ruined the season
Thank you for posting the video.
Hopefully Emily is added in this list by end of the year. ❤
About that
💔
Fire video my man
Some many options for number 1 but
Of course it's Kim!
If anyone hasn’t liked by the time they saw Kim on this list they better have smashed that like button. The rest of the order almost doesn’t matter because that is the key
Yesss! A new Bandit video
I totally disagree with Tommy and excluding Tony. I didn't see Survivor South Africa, so I am sure my international rankings wouldn't be accurate, but of just US Survivor my rankings of most dominant games, not best games neccessarily are:
1. Kim One World
2. Tony Winners at World
3. Tom Palau
4. Earl Fiji
5. Tina Outbacks
Best games would probably have Tony at #1, not Kim, and dropping Tom and Tina out of the top 5 probably, replacing them with Jeremy and possibly Natalie A or Tony from Cagayan, but these are my most dominant game rankings.
Tony at WAW was my top win in my opinion
I think what makes Kim so impressive to me is that with Rob, the other "so dominant you have them pegged as winners by episode 3" winner", it took him four attempts to nail that perfect gameplay down. Kim got it on her FIRST ATTEMPT at the game.
I don’t know anything about South Africa but I couldn’t help noticing that all four of the winners on this list that I can speak to won seasons that can be described as tedious slogs at best. I hope it’s not the case that dominant winners make for bad viewing. (Though I did like most of the seasons won by honorable mentions.)
I’d put David Genat, Tony (Cagayan), Yul, Brian or Rob D in there instead of Tommy.
Edit: Also Tom, Tina & Todd all have a case.
Kim is number one. Agreed.
I like the Survivor South Africa shoutout!
Tommy had lots of bad luck thrown his way, and still dominated the game. Very similar to Tony in WaW. I don't care what anyone says, he's a top ten winner
Tommy is the best one time player ever !
@@MariaJose-os8ll oh yeah both tommy and todd from survivor china are both up there for best one time players
@@tmm4195 todd only win because of the art of War if not courtney will win + amanda being dumb and bring him to the end and basically screwed her game because her and todd game are the same .
@@MariaJose-os8ll He only won cause of what?
@@tmm4195 art of War FTC speech sorry i forget the T
The winner of the SA season discussed felt so obvious that 2/3 of the way in, I thought “no way this guy wins right? This has to be a Rick Devons. No way anyone wins in such a dominating and obvious way. How is nobody turning on him”
Yeah that season is very frustrating, the Final 8 where Mmaba and Mike vote for Jacques even after he plays an idol before the votes legitimately took the cake for most shocking individual tribal for me
I strongly disagree with a lot of that list. Kim at #1 is probably right. Tony should be in the top 3 easily though. Not only is his Winners at Wars game the best game in history, but easily one of the most dominant too. Tommy is not top 5 in dominance at all. It was a great game but not one of the most dominant. And no way in hell is Boston Rob 2nd most dominant game ever, I probably wouldn't even have him top 5 either, and definitely not Tommy in the top 5 in terms of dominance.
I would probably flip Rob and Kim in my rankings, but by all means, they’re the two most dominant ever, almost undeniably. The factor that Kim missed that Rob took advantage of was controlling the other players. Yes, Kim was like besties with her alliance and was very much the ringleader, but she wasn’t like controlling the minds of her alliance. Her alliance members still talked to the other contestants, they even strategized with those at the bottom at some points. They may not have been great players, but they were still playing the game. They were still autonomous. Rob completely controlled his entire alliance. They couldn’t go anywhere on their own, they couldn’t talk to the opposing alliance, and they had to tell Rob everything they heard. He completely controlled them. They weren’t even playing the game. They were playing HIS game. He took away his own alliance’s autonomy, and they were happy about it. To me, that season was entertaining because it was so impressive. I hated Rob before that season, but I gained a new respect for him. Sure, it may have been unethical, but it was masterful. The other players were truly his pawns. To me, he played a perfect game. Not technically, but he played as well as anyone can possibly play and win.
Kim is far ahead of Rob in not only overall game but "dominance" for me. First off she controlled the votes even more, she had the other tribe give up immunity the women, LOL! She had control over the minority tribes votes and got them to reveal Troyzan's idol. Rob had no control over the other tribe or minority, to the point if Ometepe loses 1 of the final 3 straight immunities they won, he is fucked. Secondly Kim beats everyone in a jury vote, which should be part of dominance for me, while Rob loses a jury vote to everyone but Phillip and Natalie. So Kim far ahead of Rob in dominance.
Except Kim was in a position where she literally could’ve arranged the entire boot order in any way she can if she wanted to because she was on everyone’s side whereas Rob’s options were limited with the minority alliance that actively wanted him out.
The downside of being a dominant winner, like the ones on this list, is that there is very little opposition. Are Kim and Rob the most dominant winners ever? Sure. But color be stupid, I don’t think there is one player on either season that could do anything remotely strategic. Making it less impressive. O yea, also helps if production rigs a season in your favor.
Dee goes on the list
What about David Genat in AU All Stars?
He lost Jacqui at the merge. Exit press from other contestants also said he was found out for being the "mole" to Matt and he was in heavy consideration for being voted out of they went to another tribal council.
@@BanditSurvivorContent That’s fair. AU All Stars should’ve had the cast catch on to David but the edit really favored him. He won but that’s annoying that he was edited to be more dominant than he was
I think Zach’s blindside takes him out of contention
I feel like Parvati’s win could’ve been here in theory
Problem is, a last-second rule change saved her from having to face her most dangerous competitor. That wasn’t her fault but it does need to be taken into account on a list like this.
Erm, Parvati was dominant but Cirie’s strategy also drove things & it was Amanda that was reasonable in that favorites F3 steamrolling the rest of the end-game. Even Natalie took part in some of the moves being made by the women.
Basically, every BwB member was a important key component for her success while other dominant players made decisions more independently with their alliance members serving as extra votes to put their plans together while you can’t say the same for Parvati whereas everyone on that season were culpable in executing things.
Also, if you are including win equity, Parvati early jury management wasn’t that great & it’s a close vote against anyone more often than not.
@@kharihammon9784 this is all valid, however, you have to think about the fact that Parvati set up a lot of your first paragraph and knew that her jury management wasn’t great early and made sure that she had the best win equity in the end-by not alienating any of the BWB
@@kamaltaylor3068Fair point.
Lol Nicole from Survivor SA is my boss. Should I send her the link?
I loved Nicole and her gameplay on the season so sure thing! Let me know what she thought :)
I was hoping Kim would be on this list!
She wasn't? Theres gonna be a part 2
I feel like you have to have Mike Holloway on there as well, he did win in a very dominant fashion despite the season being pretty mediocre. 5 immunity wins is no small feat and he did a great job navigating his way through the game while being the biggest target for most of it.
Also Tinas games worth mentioning as well as Tysons.
Redemption Island and One World aren't great seasons of survivor. But I think there is enjoyment to be found in the dominance of Rob and Kim. Rob won 4 individual immunities against strong competition and used all the non-strategic players to bulldoze the ones with any willingness to play against him, then took the 2 people no one would vote for to ensure he wins as a returnee on a season with only 2 returnees. Kim ran her season and had almost every single player like and trust her then get barely any flack for being in near total control, wiping out the men one by one and making all the women think they were going to the end with her.
What’s up with narrative that Trish saved Tony every step of the way. Trish would have been voted out first in Cagayan if they had lost the first challenge. Tony would have saved her with an idol if he needed too. He brought himself and Trish from the bottom to the top by bringing Woo and Sarah to their side. Jefra started the fight between Kass and Sarah so Trish can’t get all the credit for the flip. Tony knew he was playing with why would Jefra flip and vote for him in a 4-4 tie when he would be safe if they drew rocks. Also he knew he could knew make that move against LJ and get away with it without being turned against because Spencer and Tasha were still in the game and they were terrified of them! It was partly luck they never turned on him but it’s not just pure luck or tony being “erratic.” It was a strategic decision as well as an calculated risk. He wouldn’t have made that move if he knew it had a big chance of backfiring.
wtf even is your accent? did you grow up in northern ireland with austrailian parents?
I'm Northern Irish but i'm not from Belfast which people typically assume is the stable "Northern Irish accent" I also have been announcing words differently so people understand them better. Things like "overpowered" we would pronounce "overpared" but it may confuse some viewers when I say that
@@BanditSurvivorContent ah, right on, cool. sorry, I'm just always interested in this kind of stuff. i realize now that my initial comment could've come off pretty rude.
His name isnt yoy man
How is tony not here and why cant your pronounce people names right.
I'm from a different country to you. I'm from Northern Ireland where we pronounce words or parts of words differently.