From EWTN: Whatever Pope John's disposition was, however, before the second session of the council could open, he died. His last words on his deathbed, as reported by Jean Guitton, the only Catholic layman to serve as a peritus at the Council, were: "Stop the Council; stop the Council." In any case, it is a fact that Pope John signed not one document of the Second Vatican Council.
I'm just learning John 23rd, may not be as bad as I once thought. JPII is another story. JPII is really not much different than Frances. Paul 6, was a wolf in sheeps clothing and Benedict XVI, I'm not sure what to think of him.
I'm wondering on why the popes starting from the year Our Lady of Fatima appeared, did not fulfill Our Ladies requests like Consecrating Russia to Her Immaculate Heart and revealing the 3rd Secret. How can they say they have devotions to Our Lady if they all fail to do our Lady's request? And during the world day of prayer at Assisi, all kinds of religions are there, St. Pius X is a Pope who condemned brotherhood to other religions and he is the only pope who lays at Vatican incorrupt. After that gathering at Assisi, all other religions who attend their just come back to there horrible doings. Let us remember what Our Lord Jesus have said ' I have not come to this world to bring peace but sword!' May God bless us all. 🙏
8:48 Best indication I have heard he was a liturgic revolutionary, he introduced St Joseph into the canon. First addition to canon for over one thousand years.
He also changed the practice of not recieving Holy Communion on Holy Saturday. A millennial practice. The FSSP and ICKSS use Pius XII (1958 I think) rubrics on Holy Saturday.
***** How are sede's protest-ant? They are protesting the Holy Father. Starts with that. Luther loved Our Lady too & yet he protested the Holy Father. King Henry loved Our Lady too & yet he protested. Yes, bring people to the faith. Stay in the ark come what may. As you know not everything the Holy Father says is infallible so why do you get all up in a hissyfit about this or that? Every pope has said things in error. We've had bad popes before. Why do you critique every syllable he says? Where's the joy? Who do we convert when we are blasting the Holy Father everyday? Want to be saved? STAY IN THE ARK no matter if the people in the control room are a bunch of idiots or amazing people. See the sermon "Christ is the Point" on here
"Sede's are basically protestants" "They are protesting the Holy Father. Starts with that." 1) Sts Bridget and Catherine of Siena were protesting acts of the then Holy Father. 2) Caerularius was protesting the Holy Father and in fact Saint Pope Saint Leo IX. 3) Whoever was the wrong Pope during the Western Schism was protesting the right Pope and was so technically protesting the Holy Father. Are all of above Protestants?
"looks like this great sermon brought out all the sede nuts to comment. Sede's are basically protestants" If you think John XXIII is a Saint, why don't you follow his example! How was his attitude to Clement XV? Btw, since you mentioned his grave has not been silent, while that of Saenz y Arriaga has, how about searching out if miracles happened after Clement XV / Michel Colin died in Clémory in 1974? That one you never mentioned, so far (I am only half way through).
_" The only issue is they don't believe the Popes can be heretics, that is their doctrine."_ A validly elected Pope cannot have been heretic at moment of election and can probably not fall into heresy after election either, but if he does, loses papacy. To be more precise, if he does so in external forum, loses papacy in external forum. I think you will find this is a position upheld by quite a few authorities whom you are accepting as a non-sede but traditional Catholic, most notably St Robert Bellarmine. The question about Pius XII is whether he was and remained a valid Pope, or was subtly heretic before and therefore never was elected or, the utterly improbable case, apostasised and lost papacy in perhaps 1950* (a year in which Michel Colin got a private revelation saying this had happened). The case Bergoglio is much clearer, it seems he was a heretic before election of 2013 - and while that invalidates the ecclesial act of canonisation, it doesn't necessarily mean in itself neither of the two men were saints. I had myself heard of the two miracles of Wojtyla, considered that neither of them meets the Lourdes standard, one was delayed, while the healing was even so remarcably rapid, one had relapses. I considered those meant he made it at least to Purgotory, which was sth God might want to signal since acts in Assisi 1986 and 1994 made even that doubtful. I had no idea about the healed nun, and thought Roncalli on the other hand had gone to Hell, perhaps he hasn't. And if Vatican II is NOT a second miracle, he might be a beatus - it might be right for some to honour him. Now, if he was a bad Pope since a non-Pope (confer claim of Michel Colin), he can still have been a good priest. * Humani Generis leaves a door open for clearly non-patristic readings of Genesis, and an act in 1951, though less than an encyclical, seems to clinch it that way - which is against Trent.
_"Protestants, like Easter Orthodoxy reject the Catholic doctrines that the Pope has authority over the Universal Church."_ Protestants also reject quite a lot more than Eastern Orthodox. Like Holy Mass being a Sacrifice, like Sacraments being seven, not two or three, many (but not all) also reject Real Presence in the Blessed Eucharist, and all or most (all exc. some High Church Anglicans, perhaps) pretend Eucharist can be licitly celebrated by someone who does not need to have Apostolic succession.
pope john xxiii didn't heed the instruction of our lady of fatima to read publicly the third secret; had he read it perhaps Vatican II could have been prevented to sow some heresies in the Church. How could a pope be canonized saint disobedient to God's mother?
Perhaps the 3rd secret has something to do with the 1958 conclave which stole the papacy from the true chosen pope ( Cardinal Siri - Gregory XVII) to install the usurper (Cardinal Roncalli - John XIII) and usher Satan into the Vatican?
Even Several Years later, it is still funny to read through the comments. I will never understand how people believe that they know better than the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Ghost doesn't pick the Pope, the Cardinals do. God may bestow many Grace's for the ideal Pope for his will, but that means nothing if the Cardinals are not open to it.
No one is saying that but what I do find funny is people ignore a lot of catholic history. Do you know the way they determine saints after Vatican 2 has been extremely Water down! So that’s a major issue. Meaning the way has been weakened unlike passed saints.
Remember two things and remember them well. 1) A canonization is infallible. Benedict XIV spoke at length on this as did St. Bonaventure. 2) The Church states in no uncertain terms that bad mouthing a saint is gravely sinful as it constitutes blasphemy due to the saint's relationship to God and heresy as it denies the authority and Divine protection of Holy Mother Church. Be very careful what you say in response to this video. You could easily walk on unholy ground.
So even if JPII condoned and participated in heresy - a statue of buddha on the altar of Assisi - that’s okay because he’s “a saint”? Interesting logic.
@Robert Tevault It's been two years since I wrote that comment. In that time I've grown less and less comfortable with anything Francis has declared including canonizations. What worries me in particular is he seems to push hard to canonize popes who participated in the Council and has done so without applying the kind of scrutiny once required of the process. I sincerely hope these men are in heaven. If they are I guarantee you they have regrets they've had to turn over to God regarding decisions they made as Pope. I also know I could not in good conscience venerate Francis when a future Pope inevitably tries to canonize him (barring any public conversion before be dies).
Sorry but JPII prayed with Jews, kissed a Koran, elevated a Buddha statue onto a Catholic altar, prayed with pagans and heretics, etc. To be even considered for canonization a public heretic must publicly repent.
Its a physical sign of the immense purity that that person(saint) had whilst they were on earth. That purity meaning charity and charity meaning love for God in all things and every intention. Its a grace from God really. You should watch Radio Immaculata for better answers, they are a great group of Franciscans, with countless of videos about the catholic faith. Ave Maria!
Interesting all the lofty goals that amounted to the dilution of the One True Faith. Seems like all were taken by pride. How dare any man think that welcoming the enemy into the House of God would improve our worship. We are instructed to pray for those that hate us, not let them destroy our Church
The Fr. preacher had an exclusive honor, a personal experience, an emotional jolt regarding the pope and he is now convinced of his holiness. And what's more he almost basically knew J23rd because of his elite circumstances! Amazing! Must have been quite an emotional ride! A privilege! Wow what a story! In fact being closely acquainted with these "holy giants" he is almost up there as well! People have every right to be disgusted at the state of the papacy (J23 and P6 were basically bloodline jews without a spine), the papal office has been sliding downhill ever since 1929. Lateran Treaty, the end of effective Monarchical power of the Pope. The Fall of Rome 1870.- 1929. was the era of crisis and saintly Popes. Don't think Pius XII was any better (well he was in moral teaching), his administrative oversights, deliberate or negligent, brought forth many of the early children of the Revolution in the Church. What shouldn't do is despair (easier said than done), because this is the cross God wills us to bear. Being subordinated to incompetent or ill willed men is a terrible cross but the supernatural virtue of Hope demands we carry it to a better end. God forgives the idiot and the repentant - and so should we. Remember the French Revolution, the King who paid with his head was more or less a pious man, but the several Kings preceding him who had all the time in the world to consecrate France to the Immaculate Heart were rotten. Innocent blood, innocent suffering is what expiates the sins of the world. _Whom God would destroy [convert], He first makes mad._ The papacy is in the state of madness, we have had contemplative revolutionaries, we have had a traveling rock-star, we have had a faux conservative, and we have a worldly publicity loving materialist (the first "humble" pope).
People i don't want to knit pick but did not the Lord give the keys to St Peter and following Popes to bind and loosen? And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven. matthew 16:19 douay rheims version.
He opened the church to the synthesis of all heresy and he deliberately refused to release the Third Secret of Fatima in 1960 because it didn't fit his narrative , he didn't want to listen to the prophets of doom and he put all his trust in the good will of the Communists, Freemasons , Protestants and all secular ideologies , gambling on his opinion, the fate of the church and in 2021 we can see the unmitigated disaster of his sad and error filled council
I will openly and honestly say, in response to the Calumnies, that I would actually start by watching some of the Rev Anthony Cekada videos before tossing such libel. The sedes are the same group who were part of the opening group of SSPX, just like the founders of the FSSP. The difference is the sedes that are seen publicly werebthe cream of the crop of the opening years, and more accomplished than Berg and Bisig. Anyone familiar with those years knows this. Sanborn, Kelly, Crkada and Jenkins (as well as Cooramswamy) were the heads of the American Chapter, seminary and philosophy, literature and canon law departments. I would challenge anyone to read the online articles by Cekada and call him a cook. I attend an FSSP and SSPX chapel, but pretending what I’m saying in this post is wrong is just ostrich syndrome. This sermon is outrageous and effeminate. And thus must be publicly rebuked.
quite a bit of masonic values in there! So is sensus fidelium slowly turning novus ordo? I saw lots of Divine Mercy sister Faustina things which despite the obvious falacies you seem to support. Now we have support for 2 modernists popes whom the vatican wants to uphold in glory will no indications of holiness seem to stick to them. No miracles, sayings that support masonic values etc... ST-PIUS X: IPSO FACTO excommunication on the modernists! Kinda disappointed listener here!!
8:30 Could win hearts over to the truth - sure. But if a certain society turns heartless and persecutes a heart won over to the truth, should the Church not condemn it? And that is what every false religion and ideology is doing. Some priest is having a nice chat with a Protestant, hears the Protestant express worries about the mental balance of en ex-Protestant prospective or already convert, and the priest who is chatting with him lends his ear. He is also chatting with a Muslim, a Jew sometimes even a Mason and a Commie .... do you see where denunciation might rationally come in, with all Fiducia we can have to Our Lady?
He's a "saint" alright but not for Jesus and His One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. He (Roncalli aka john 20turd) is an antichrist/antipope and certainly one of satan's "saints" who's soul is so rotten his body couldn't be preserved with the best modern embalming technology could provide.
Yes, both him and JP II are anti-popes and are the reason for the deterioration of Gods Church and the degenerative morality that the Church finds her self in.
Hope you are greater then popes & have no skeletons in your closets. You start judging salvation & you will be judged too. Infallible statements by the Church if you haven't learned yet from other sermons
Video Sancto thank you for your responds but I would like you to pleases explain to me how can a Pope not comply with the request of our blessed mother and still be a Saint? He is suppose to to be our guiding light.. As for JPII how can the excommunication of the SSP X occur under his supervision and Pop Benedict XI try to bring them back to the church? A Pope is a man even St Peter denied The Lord..
Jesus Mendoza a quick correction. The Catholic Church is perfect and cannot suffer "degenerative"(ly) or deterioration ...The correct view is that; as before with the Arians, we are a in a state of remnant. See: The massage from Our Lady of LaSallette. "Rome will lose the Faith... ...The church will be in remnant." Also read 2 Thessalonians, and Apocalypse... It is men of bad will that deteriorates not the Church. The Church & church militant is suffering persecution as Jesus did too. This is the limited fruition of the evil prophesied about concerning the vatican 2 sect aka The Whore of Babylon who are "Catholic" in name only. Your use of the word mortality is wrong too since that suggests Jesus is a liar when He reveals in Matthew 16 that the gates of hell will never prevail against His Church. And all vain attempts are simply a sifting of the wheat. i.e. Faithful from the "faithful" (the judas es from the elect).
A little suspicious Father that they seem to want to make great saints of all the popes of the post conciliar Church. Now it's Paul the sixth. Give me a break ! A good talker could convince you of anything.
Vatican I had their shares of victories & stories of bad priests...Vatican II also had victories and bad stories also among the clergy but if you're a faithful Catholics I agree w/the Priest commented STAY IN THE ARK...sowing hatred & division does not bring soul to Christ...and this tactics do belong to the Old Serpent...GodBless! IHMMP4us. Blessed Ivan Merz, pray for us...www.flameoflove.us...
John 23rd disobeyed Our Lady of Fatima's request. I can't judge but neither can I listen to this priest's personal opinion. Maybe he made it to heaven but he should not be honored as a great saint. Sorry.
I believe that we have and had popes. St John Paul 23 , pope, was wrong in the deal with Russia to not criticize communism. Very wrong.and he failed width 7 other popes to consecrate Russia toImmaculatds Heart of Mary. So I respectfully question all 8 Pope's devotion to Our Mother. I will not listen anymore to this sermon.
Me neither. For crying out loud (and I almost did), LOOK AT THE CHURCH AS IT IS. I am not a sedevacantist, but it's very upsetting to realize that we or our children may have to live through the chastisement because these popes did not heed Our Lady's wishes -- that same Lady to whom they all claimed such a devotion.
Who is this priest? He's quite ignorant. And sounds very arrogant. Many priests have said Rome is where you go to lose your faith. Get home outta here and may he repent for propigating the VII confusion.
From EWTN: Whatever Pope John's disposition was, however, before the second session of the council could open, he died. His last words on his deathbed, as reported by Jean Guitton, the only Catholic layman to serve as a peritus at the Council, were: "Stop the Council; stop the Council." In any case, it is a fact that Pope John signed not one document of the Second Vatican Council.
I'm just learning John 23rd, may not be as bad as I once thought. JPII is another story. JPII is really not much different than Frances. Paul 6, was a wolf in sheeps clothing and Benedict XVI, I'm not sure what to think of him.
@@raysunnydale8974 paul vi was a failiure pope, but he wasn't a bad man himself.
I'm wondering on why the popes starting from the year Our Lady of Fatima appeared, did not fulfill Our Ladies requests like Consecrating Russia to Her Immaculate Heart and revealing the 3rd Secret. How can they say they have devotions to Our Lady if they all fail to do our Lady's request? And during the world day of prayer at Assisi, all kinds of religions are there, St. Pius X is a Pope who condemned brotherhood to other religions and he is the only pope who lays at Vatican incorrupt. After that gathering at Assisi, all other religions who attend their just come back to there horrible doings. Let us remember what Our Lord Jesus have said ' I have not come to this world to bring peace but sword!' May God bless us all. 🙏
8:48 Best indication I have heard he was a liturgic revolutionary, he introduced St Joseph into the canon.
First addition to canon for over one thousand years.
He also changed the practice of not recieving Holy Communion on Holy Saturday. A millennial practice. The FSSP and ICKSS use Pius XII (1958 I think) rubrics on Holy Saturday.
looks like this great sermon brought out all the sede nuts to comment. Sede's are basically protestants
***** How are sede's protest-ant? They are protesting the Holy Father. Starts with that. Luther loved Our Lady too & yet he protested the Holy Father. King Henry loved Our Lady too & yet he protested. Yes, bring people to the faith. Stay in the ark come what may. As you know not everything the Holy Father says is infallible so why do you get all up in a hissyfit about this or that? Every pope has said things in error. We've had bad popes before. Why do you critique every syllable he says? Where's the joy? Who do we convert when we are blasting the Holy Father everyday? Want to be saved? STAY IN THE ARK no matter if the people in the control room are a bunch of idiots or amazing people. See the sermon "Christ is the Point" on here
"Sede's are basically protestants" "They are protesting the Holy Father. Starts with that."
1) Sts Bridget and Catherine of Siena were protesting acts of the then Holy Father.
2) Caerularius was protesting the Holy Father and in fact Saint Pope Saint Leo IX.
3) Whoever was the wrong Pope during the Western Schism was protesting the right Pope and was so technically protesting the Holy Father.
Are all of above Protestants?
"looks like this great sermon brought out all the sede nuts to comment. Sede's are basically protestants"
If you think John XXIII is a Saint, why don't you follow his example!
How was his attitude to Clement XV?
Btw, since you mentioned his grave has not been silent, while that of Saenz y Arriaga has, how about searching out if miracles happened after Clement XV / Michel Colin died in Clémory in 1974? That one you never mentioned, so far (I am only half way through).
_" The only issue is they don't believe the Popes can be heretics, that is their doctrine."_
A validly elected Pope cannot have been heretic at moment of election and can probably not fall into heresy after election either, but if he does, loses papacy.
To be more precise, if he does so in external forum, loses papacy in external forum.
I think you will find this is a position upheld by quite a few authorities whom you are accepting as a non-sede but traditional Catholic, most notably St Robert Bellarmine.
The question about Pius XII is whether he was and remained a valid Pope, or was subtly heretic before and therefore never was elected or, the utterly improbable case, apostasised and lost papacy in perhaps 1950* (a year in which Michel Colin got a private revelation saying this had happened).
The case Bergoglio is much clearer, it seems he was a heretic before election of 2013 - and while that invalidates the ecclesial act of canonisation, it doesn't necessarily mean in itself neither of the two men were saints.
I had myself heard of the two miracles of Wojtyla, considered that neither of them meets the Lourdes standard, one was delayed, while the healing was even so remarcably rapid, one had relapses.
I considered those meant he made it at least to Purgotory, which was sth God might want to signal since acts in Assisi 1986 and 1994 made even that doubtful. I had no idea about the healed nun, and thought Roncalli on the other hand had gone to Hell, perhaps he hasn't.
And if Vatican II is NOT a second miracle, he might be a beatus - it might be right for some to honour him.
Now, if he was a bad Pope since a non-Pope (confer claim of Michel Colin), he can still have been a good priest.
* Humani Generis leaves a door open for clearly non-patristic readings of Genesis, and an act in 1951, though less than an encyclical, seems to clinch it that way - which is against Trent.
_"Protestants, like Easter Orthodoxy reject the Catholic doctrines that the Pope has authority over the Universal Church."_
Protestants also reject quite a lot more than Eastern Orthodox. Like Holy Mass being a Sacrifice, like Sacraments being seven, not two or three, many (but not all) also reject Real Presence in the Blessed Eucharist, and all or most (all exc. some High Church Anglicans, perhaps) pretend Eucharist can be licitly celebrated by someone who does not need to have Apostolic succession.
pope john xxiii didn't heed the instruction of our lady of fatima to read publicly the third secret; had he read it perhaps Vatican II could have been prevented to sow some heresies in the Church. How could a pope be canonized saint disobedient to God's mother?
Perhaps the 3rd secret has something to do with the 1958 conclave which stole the papacy from the true chosen pope ( Cardinal Siri - Gregory XVII) to install the usurper (Cardinal Roncalli - John XIII) and usher Satan into the Vatican?
I love the church. Amen. I love the truth of the gospel. Amen. I love the second coming of our lord Jesus Christ Amen.
This gave me goosebumps! Sanctorum Pontifices Ioannes XIII et Ioannes Paulus II, orate pro nobis!
Pope John XIII🤔
*XXIII
Even Several Years later, it is still funny to read through the comments. I will never understand how people believe that they know better than the Holy Spirit.
See the prophecies! Remember Fatima and the smoke of satan having entered the Church!
The Holy Ghost doesn't pick the Pope, the Cardinals do. God may bestow many Grace's for the ideal Pope for his will, but that means nothing if the Cardinals are not open to it.
And of course you know the will of the Holy Ghost?!
No one is saying that but what I do find funny is people ignore a lot of catholic history. Do you know the way they determine saints after Vatican 2 has been extremely Water down! So that’s a major issue. Meaning the way has been weakened unlike passed saints.
Time to take a step back and have a spiritual cup of hot coffee!!! LORD HAVE MERCY!!
Somehow a different view on Vatican 2 and consequently John xxiii strange though coming from a priest from sensium fidelium strange really
Exactly my thoughts!
Beautiful, thank Fr. Thank Sensus Fidelium.
Remember two things and remember them well.
1) A canonization is infallible. Benedict XIV spoke at length on this as did St. Bonaventure.
2) The Church states in no uncertain terms that bad mouthing a saint is gravely sinful as it constitutes blasphemy due to the saint's relationship to God and heresy as it denies the authority and Divine protection of Holy Mother Church.
Be very careful what you say in response to this video. You could easily walk on unholy ground.
Cannonized? Yeah that is the question
Interestingly they were both canonised by Francis. So the validity rests on his papacy...
@@petarmajetic6442 Oh very much so. Just as much as the Consecration of Russia depends on the same. We'll see what the Holy Spirit reveals.
So even if JPII condoned and participated in heresy - a statue of buddha on the altar of Assisi - that’s okay because he’s “a saint”? Interesting logic.
@Robert Tevault It's been two years since I wrote that comment. In that time I've grown less and less comfortable with anything Francis has declared including canonizations.
What worries me in particular is he seems to push hard to canonize popes who participated in the Council and has done so without applying the kind of scrutiny once required of the process. I sincerely hope these men are in heaven. If they are I guarantee you they have regrets they've had to turn over to God regarding decisions they made as Pope.
I also know I could not in good conscience venerate Francis when a future Pope inevitably tries to canonize him (barring any public conversion before be dies).
Sorry but JPII prayed with Jews, kissed a Koran, elevated a Buddha statue onto a Catholic altar, prayed with pagans and heretics, etc. To be even considered for canonization a public heretic must publicly repent.
What does it mean when his body was found incorruptible. I would have like to have the answer to that!
They injected his body with some sort of embalming fluid to keep his body from decaying it seems!
It means that the body did not decay as many saints bodies have been found.
It does not mean decay but to still be ply able
Its a physical sign of the immense purity that that person(saint) had whilst they were on earth. That purity meaning charity and charity meaning love for God in all things and every intention. Its a grace from God really. You should watch Radio Immaculata for better answers, they are a great group of Franciscans, with countless of videos about the catholic faith.
Ave Maria!
Not sure what to think about this one.
Interesting all the lofty goals that amounted to the dilution of the One True Faith. Seems like all were taken by pride. How dare any man think that welcoming the enemy into the House of God would improve our worship. We are instructed to pray for those that hate us, not let them destroy our Church
The Fr. preacher had an exclusive honor, a personal experience, an emotional jolt regarding the pope and he is now convinced of his holiness. And what's more he almost basically knew J23rd because of his elite circumstances! Amazing! Must have been quite an emotional ride! A privilege! Wow what a story! In fact being closely acquainted with these "holy giants" he is almost up there as well!
People have every right to be disgusted at the state of the papacy (J23 and P6 were basically bloodline jews without a spine), the papal office has been sliding downhill ever since 1929. Lateran Treaty, the end of effective Monarchical power of the Pope. The Fall of Rome 1870.- 1929. was the era of crisis and saintly Popes. Don't think Pius XII was any better (well he was in moral teaching), his administrative oversights, deliberate or negligent, brought forth many of the early children of the Revolution in the Church.
What shouldn't do is despair (easier said than done), because this is the cross God wills us to bear. Being subordinated to incompetent or ill willed men is a terrible cross but the supernatural virtue of Hope demands we carry it to a better end. God forgives the idiot and the repentant - and so should we.
Remember the French Revolution, the King who paid with his head was more or less a pious man, but the several Kings preceding him who had all the time in the world to consecrate France to the Immaculate Heart were rotten. Innocent blood, innocent suffering is what expiates the sins of the world.
_Whom God would destroy [convert], He first makes mad._ The papacy is in the state of madness, we have had contemplative revolutionaries, we have had a traveling rock-star, we have had a faux conservative, and we have a worldly publicity loving materialist (the first "humble" pope).
People i don't want to knit pick but did not the Lord give the keys to St Peter and following Popes to bind and loosen?
And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven. matthew 16:19 douay rheims version.
He opened the church to the synthesis of all heresy and he deliberately refused to release the Third Secret of Fatima in 1960 because it didn't fit his narrative , he didn't want to listen to the prophets of doom and he put all his trust in the good will of the Communists, Freemasons , Protestants and all secular ideologies , gambling on his opinion, the fate of the church and in 2021 we can see the unmitigated disaster of his sad and error filled council
Is the picture of the guy with the book the guy speaking?
Spoken like a true moderest
Ushering in that V2 modernism, really though
I have no idea where this priest come from. Sounds like the attorney defending O.J. Simpson, Johnnie Cochran.
Oh stop being a prima Donna. You're a grown man sounding so melodramatic
I will openly and honestly say, in response to the Calumnies, that I would actually start by watching some of the Rev Anthony Cekada videos before tossing such libel. The sedes are the same group who were part of the opening group of SSPX, just like the founders of the FSSP. The difference is the sedes that are seen publicly werebthe cream of the crop of the opening years, and more accomplished than Berg and Bisig. Anyone familiar with those years knows this. Sanborn, Kelly, Crkada and Jenkins (as well as Cooramswamy) were the heads of the American Chapter, seminary and philosophy, literature and canon law departments. I would challenge anyone to read the online articles by Cekada and call him a cook. I attend an FSSP and SSPX chapel, but pretending what I’m saying in this post is wrong is just ostrich syndrome. This sermon is outrageous and effeminate. And thus must be publicly rebuked.
I didn’t know it was the policy to advocate for the saint making machine of Conciliar modernism.
I found theses priests on line 5 years ago what they say I believe is the truth wcbohio etc Larry .Thank God I did find them
quite a bit of masonic values in there! So is sensus fidelium slowly turning novus ordo? I saw lots of Divine Mercy sister Faustina things which despite the obvious falacies you seem to support. Now we have support for 2 modernists popes whom the vatican wants to uphold in glory will no indications of holiness seem to stick to them. No miracles, sayings that support masonic values etc... ST-PIUS X: IPSO FACTO excommunication on the modernists! Kinda disappointed listener here!!
Me too! Very discouraging
8:30 Could win hearts over to the truth - sure.
But if a certain society turns heartless and persecutes a heart won over to the truth, should the Church not condemn it?
And that is what every false religion and ideology is doing.
Some priest is having a nice chat with a Protestant, hears the Protestant express worries about the mental balance of en ex-Protestant prospective or already convert, and the priest who is chatting with him lends his ear. He is also chatting with a Muslim, a Jew sometimes even a Mason and a Commie .... do you see where denunciation might rationally come in, with all Fiducia we can have to Our Lady?
How can John XIII be a saint when he did not reveal the third secrete of Fatima as the Blessed Mother asked in 1960?
He's a "saint" alright but not for Jesus and His One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.
He (Roncalli aka john 20turd) is an antichrist/antipope and certainly one of satan's "saints" who's soul is so rotten his body couldn't be preserved with the best modern embalming technology could provide.
Yes, both him and JP II are anti-popes and are the reason for the deterioration of Gods Church and the degenerative morality that the Church finds her self in.
Hope you are greater then popes & have no skeletons in your closets. You start judging salvation & you will be judged too. Infallible statements by the Church if you haven't learned yet from other sermons
Video Sancto thank you for your responds but I would like you to pleases explain to me how can a Pope not comply with the request of our blessed mother and still be a Saint? He is suppose to to be our guiding light.. As for JPII how can the excommunication of the SSP X occur under his supervision and Pop Benedict XI try to bring them back to the church? A Pope is a man even St Peter denied The Lord..
Jesus Mendoza a quick correction.
The Catholic Church is perfect and cannot suffer "degenerative"(ly) or deterioration ...The correct view is that;
as before with the Arians, we are a in a state of remnant.
See: The massage from Our Lady of LaSallette. "Rome will lose the Faith... ...The church will be in remnant."
Also read 2 Thessalonians, and Apocalypse...
It is men of bad will that deteriorates not the Church.
The Church & church militant is suffering persecution as Jesus did too.
This is the limited fruition of the evil prophesied about concerning the vatican 2 sect aka The Whore of Babylon who are "Catholic" in name only.
Your use of the word mortality is wrong too since that suggests Jesus is a liar when He reveals in Matthew 16 that the gates of hell will never prevail against His Church.
And all vain attempts are simply a sifting of the wheat.
i.e.
Faithful from the "faithful" (the judas es from the elect).
It was a non-binding council!!!
Bad idea they are Vatican II or Novus Ordo lost of Traditions
I am no sede but I know hout a doubt the the two popes he was talking about are not canonizable saints they could be in hell
A little suspicious Father that they seem to want to make great saints of all the popes of the post conciliar Church. Now it's Paul the sixth. Give me a break ! A good talker could convince you of anything.
I wish this video would be removed,i would certainly appreciate someone apologizing for such misinformation.
Well, anybody can be a saint in the Church of Judas provided his intentions are upright and he receives enough respect.
This is a very corrupt sermon!!! Upsetting...
Yeah… drug lords in Mexico are also “devote” to the Virgin…
You're with the True Church or with Masonry...tradition or Novus Ordo...Pope St. Pius V and X or JP XXIII and JPII.
Vatican I had their shares of victories & stories of bad priests...Vatican II also had victories and bad stories also among the clergy but if you're a faithful Catholics I agree w/the Priest commented STAY IN THE ARK...sowing hatred & division does not bring soul to Christ...and this tactics do belong to the Old Serpent...GodBless! IHMMP4us. Blessed Ivan Merz, pray for us...www.flameoflove.us...
Why did 23rd destroy the church with vat 2?
his Rominita lied
John 23rd disobeyed Our Lady of Fatima's request. I can't judge but neither can I listen to this priest's personal opinion. Maybe he made it to heaven but he should not be honored as a great saint. Sorry.
Only when paul john23, john paul 2 canonized, only until pig flies. Do not play as politicians, stick to your saints’ stories.
?????????????????????????
proof of well wishing naivete
I believe that we have and had popes. St John Paul 23 , pope, was wrong in the deal with Russia to not criticize communism. Very wrong.and he failed width 7 other popes to consecrate Russia toImmaculatds Heart of Mary. So I respectfully question all 8 Pope's devotion to Our Mother. I will not listen anymore to this sermon.
Me neither. For crying out loud (and I almost did), LOOK AT THE CHURCH AS IT IS. I am not a sedevacantist, but it's very upsetting to realize that we or our children may have to live through the chastisement because these popes did not heed Our Lady's wishes -- that same Lady to whom they all claimed such a devotion.
Who is this priest? He's quite ignorant. And sounds very arrogant. Many priests have said Rome is where you go to lose your faith. Get home outta here and may he repent for propigating the VII confusion.
Pope St John Paul pray for us
This video is a disappointment and a contradiction.
no Sede are not nuts. Father. I know for a fact there has not been a valid Pope since the death of Pope Puis XII
How ghastly... two popes who helped to destroy the Church. No thanks.
Apostasy
Anti Pope Though