it isn't about "movement" that the casual viewer sees. It's about pressure on the blocks, movement on the blocks that the sensors pick up. RUclips viewers are rarely experts on the rules that apply
not about starting early - it's about being unsteady in the shoulders etc or putting pressure on the blocks indicating potentially predicting the gun. Everyone here commenting would be wiser reading the actual criteria for false starts
In track and field sprints, the sport's governing body, the IAAF, has a rule that if the athlete moves within 0.1 seconds after the gun has fired the athlete has false-started.[3] This figure is based on tests that show the human brain cannot hear and process the information from the start sound in under 0.10 seconds,[4] even though a IAAF-commissioned study indicated in 2009 that top sprinters are able to sometimes react in 0.08 s.[5] This rule is only applied at high-level meets where fully automated force or motion sensor devices are built into the starting blocks that are tied via computer with the starter's gun. In the vast majority of lower-level meets, false starts are determined visually by the officials.
This explains what happened today at Worlds. Thanks for the breakdown because in all 3 of today’s DQs, I didn’t see a jumpstart or false start. But the sensors detected it nonetheless.
@@trackgrad08 how are you supposed to see it in the first place when I'm guessing you'd be trying to detect movement before the gunshot with your eyes right? But he started after the gun but still too early for their standards. That being said idk why this guy made that comment that you seemed to agree with cuz I think this is a new rule no? I think before the gunshot was the only thing you shouldn't start before. And this video is from 2003 or something so was that rule even existent back then?
wait I thought at this time you have to have two false starts to be disqualified. Did both of them false start twice or not. I just saw one false start and two red cards and one yellow.
I read on the world athletics site: "At the first attempt Jamaican Dwight THOMAS broke. This left the field with no further warnings, as the new IAAF rule dictates. At the second attempt the field was recalled for another false start. The reaction times read that both Jon DRUMMOND (USA) and Asafa POWELL (JAM) were inside the legal one tenth of a second."
This is the race that totally damaged Asafa confidence going forward in world championships finals. I think this incidence had totally traumatized him. He was unknown here and would have being the winner.
@@mikekillagreen9432 Do you really understand the reference here ? "I didn't move" That's what he was repeating while refusing to leave the pitch and it became a kind of what's called a meme these days.
@@jarekc.6041 interesting point but I'm guessing that would be clarified in the rules no? So if that's what they did maybe that's what happened. Are you saying they decide these things arbitrarily?
Sportsman of the year ? Crybaby of the month? Or just your typical " win at all costs North American " ? I'd let him have the Lance Armstrong Medal for Fairness in Sport ! They probably took the same drugs anyway....
Here bc of worlds and the commentators comments 🧍🏻♂️
Please don't 😂😂😂😂😂
@@jcchambers7896 i'm here JUST because Ato said that
JD wasn't even the first out of the blocks & STILL got nailed!!! WTFFFFFFFFFF!
Bc his foot came off the block
He clearly did not move early! He should stand his ground!!!
it isn't about "movement" that the casual viewer sees. It's about pressure on the blocks, movement on the blocks that the sensors pick up. RUclips viewers are rarely experts on the rules that apply
@@stevecrocker6904 are runners experts? Why did he complain then?
He 100% moved early his foot came off the block.
He didn't look like he started early to me cannot blame him being mad
not about starting early - it's about being unsteady in the shoulders etc or putting pressure on the blocks indicating potentially predicting the gun. Everyone here commenting would be wiser reading the actual criteria for false starts
@@stevecrocker6904 don't the runners know that though?
he really didn't
Yes he did his foot came off the block too soon.
The network tv broadcast was epic!
Where can I find this on RUclips
came here from Gaither's dq 2022. So Philly!!! I'm here for it!!! ... WHEN USA HAD NICE ORIGINAL KITS!!!
Me too
What’s a “Kits”?
@ameliabedelia7018 their outfits are called track kits.
In track and field sprints, the sport's governing body, the IAAF, has a rule that if the athlete moves within 0.1 seconds after the gun has fired the athlete has false-started.[3] This figure is based on tests that show the human brain cannot hear and process the information from the start sound in under 0.10 seconds,[4] even though a IAAF-commissioned study indicated in 2009 that top sprinters are able to sometimes react in 0.08 s.[5] This rule is only applied at high-level meets where fully automated force or motion sensor devices are built into the starting blocks that are tied via computer with the starter's gun. In the vast majority of lower-level meets, false starts are determined visually by the officials.
This explains what happened today at Worlds. Thanks for the breakdown because in all 3 of today’s DQs, I didn’t see a jumpstart or false start. But the sensors detected it nonetheless.
@@trackgrad08 how are you supposed to see it in the first place when I'm guessing you'd be trying to detect movement before the gunshot with your eyes right? But he started after the gun but still too early for their standards. That being said idk why this guy made that comment that you seemed to agree with cuz I think this is a new rule no? I think before the gunshot was the only thing you shouldn't start before. And this video is from 2003 or something so was that rule even existent back then?
Who knew your analysis would be so crucial 3 weeks later
0:57 Ato is PISSED! But he kept his focus and concentration to win!
Why's he pissed
@@sowhat... his race is being delayed the longer it takes for them to run the worst they perform and higher risk of injury.
He actually didnt
Both Powell and Drummond set off the sensors (Powell's is obvious).
When company won't leave.
Slo mo at the 45 second mark shows Asafa Powell breaking early.
I was going to mock his behavior... But wait a sec! IT WAS NOT A FALSE START. NEVER A FALSE START .. GOOD FOR YOU DRUMMOND
wait I thought at this time you have to have two false starts to be disqualified. Did both of them false start twice or not. I just saw one false start and two red cards and one yellow.
I read on the world athletics site: "At the first attempt Jamaican Dwight THOMAS broke. This left the field with no further warnings, as the new IAAF rule dictates. At the second attempt the field was recalled for another false start. The reaction times read that both Jon DRUMMOND (USA) and Asafa POWELL (JAM) were inside the legal one tenth of a second."
He did not move
This is the race that totally damaged Asafa confidence going forward in world championships finals. I think this incidence had totally traumatized him. He was unknown here and would have being the winner.
It was the Jamaican to his right and our left that false start
Your mama false start to the right and your grandma to the left
Asafa powell would have meddled in the finals.
with his finals record, probably not.
For some reason Powell do not perform under pressure well . I have no idea why
That would be asafa first gold he would have won but that's life Gatlin got him worried
@@thisurlisoriginal this is what dismantled is confidence, he'd easily beat this field.
@@shiediesel totally agree with u
This is BS,Drummond is right,something was prepared to put him out of the race!!!
Dafuq ⊙_⊙ !
I DID NOT MOVE ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ !!!1!
That was cruel on him
He didn't move :-D
It's a sensor so even if his foot barely moved you wouldn't see it.
@@mikekillagreen9432 Do you really understand the reference here ?
"I didn't move" That's what he was repeating while refusing to leave the pitch and it became a kind of what's called a meme these days.
@@yapadqoi Yeah let's take his word for it. You're so naive.
@@mikekillagreen9432 Yes, I'm naive I guess. I thought you know what a joke is about.
@@yapadqoi You weren't joking. Lol
Ah oh~ Drama~
Hey! Do you own this video? If so, can we repost on all platforms with credit to you? 😁
動いてねぇじゃん、陸連マジでふざけんな
これ結局動いたの？
まぁ、判定機に設定された時間より早かったという事かと。科学的な見地で設定されたものだろうけど、この時は鍛え抜かれ、研ぎ澄まされた反射神経がそれを上回ったのかも、と私は思っています。私は以前にスターターをしていて、このレースもリアルタイムで見ていましたが、誰がフライングか分からなかったです。その場で見ていたわけではないのですが、私だったらリコールは鳴らさなかっただろうと。
ただ、もうこの時点で国際レベルの大会ではオートリコールが採用されてたのかな...？
俺3年前にこんなコメントしてたんか
Rumor has it Drummond farted and Osafa Powell thought it was the gun, thereby eliminating both contestants.
今日道徳の時に見た( ˙罒˙ )
really unfair because u cant dis 2 runners in same time
you certainly can. It's not about who is deemed to have moved first if both moved. It happened at the 2010 Commonwealth Games women's 100m final
@@stevecrocker6904 i dont agree... if one of man moved its automatic dis and stop run - period. First false = stop run. You cant false after someone.
@@jarekc.6041 interesting point but I'm guessing that would be clarified in the rules no? So if that's what they did maybe that's what happened. Are you saying they decide these things arbitrarily?
Sportsman of the year ? Crybaby of the month? Or just your typical " win at all costs North American " ? I'd let him have the Lance Armstrong Medal for Fairness in Sport ! They probably took the same drugs anyway....
Kick Rocks
@Johann Brandstatter Go pound sand, oh wait you don’t have any in your country.