China Pakistan Alliance Plans I Importance of Gilgit Baltistan I Maj Gen Rajiv Narayanan I Aadi

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
  • What area China Pakistan Alliance Plans? What is the importance of Gilgit Baltistan in this relationship. How should India protect its interests? In Hinglish
    #chinapakistan #china #gilgitbaltistan #deftalks
    DEF Talks is a space for clear cut discussions on important subjects of current affairs of the world with a prime focus to the Indian Subcontinent. I cover issues related to conflicts, Geopolitics, Military Strategy and Foreign Affairs.
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @deftalksbyaadi
    Do support me by clicking "Thanks'.
    Connect With me and Interact
    Whatsapp Group: chat.whatsapp....
    EMAIL: aadiachint@gmail.com
    TELEGRAM: t.me/deftalksaadi
    LINKEDIN: DEF TALKS BY AADI ACHINT
    TWITTER: / aadiachint
    Copyrights owned.

Комментарии • 46

  • @ajeshdixit4761
    @ajeshdixit4761 Год назад +3

    My Heartfelt Respect to Both of You, Sir...Proud to be having Such Deep Insightful Thinkers ❤🙏🙏🙏

  • @surendrabarsode8959
    @surendrabarsode8959 Год назад +5

    1. As usual, a very informative and a wonderful show to watch! The geography of Wakan and GNBO etc. was not known in such a detail to me. Thanks General and Adi! 2. As regards INST, what General says is of course right in terms of cost of transportation by existing shipping routes. But INST was envisaged for increasing trade between landlocked countries of Central Asia with their linkages to Russia and Europe in the north and Iran and India etc. to the South. Given that, we need to look at it not only as route between India to Europe but between India to Central Asia and beyond. Then it makes good sense. 2. What General mentions about China being scared or worried of Pakistani backstabbing is interesting and sounds logical. But India ought to assume a scenario where entire northern borders from Ladakh to POK are under Chinese control and be ready accordingly. In view of this, India must make this possibility remote by injecting itself into areas up to Skardu at least and break off links to Karakoram Highway. 3. General may like to tell us about IAF Air base in Tajikistan and how important it is in some future episode. How do our aircrafts reach there?

  • @True-Nationalist
    @True-Nationalist Год назад +1

    Keep up the Good work Adi👍👍👍
    All Panelists are best experts in their own right 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @VijRaghavan
    @VijRaghavan Год назад

    Always a pleasure and feel fantastic with Gen Rajiv Sir. Kudos to Def talks Aadi Sir.

  • @Feierabend8051
    @Feierabend8051 Год назад

    By far the best discussion on Hafiz sb visit to his strategic Medina ! 👏

    • @Feierabend8051
      @Feierabend8051 Год назад

      I comprehend , the net SBP reserves as on 20 April official is 4.4 Billion and liquid fix reserves as 10 Billion $. The news of 10 billion dollar reserves seems misleading and perhaps from some PDM news outlet.

  • @srinivasrao8863
    @srinivasrao8863 Год назад +10

    Withdraw from Indus Water Treaty as response.

    • @A-K-D
      @A-K-D Год назад +1

      We can withdraw but can't stop water for next few years or decade.

    • @chillax360
      @chillax360 Год назад

      ​@@A-K-D can't we direct the water towards India

    • @A-K-D
      @A-K-D Год назад

      @@chillax360 mate, we need to build dams and canals for it. It takes time. I am all for it but just saying Pak will see the impact only after sometime but we still need to do it.

    • @A-K-D
      @A-K-D Год назад

      @@markvelber8664 May be in Arunachal but not in Kashmir. We have glaciers in our territory.

  • @vchitnis
    @vchitnis Год назад

    As always, hugely insightful session by Maj Gen Rajiv Narayanan.
    Just want to add my bit to a comment made by Maj Gen about the lack of industrial capacity in Europe to arm Ukraine for the ongoing conflict.
    Actually, it appears that the combined NATO, which includes the US, does not have the industrial capacity to militarily support Ukraine. At least some US defense manufacturers have 'demanded' US government's contribution to the investments needed for capacity expansions. To me, it suggests that the US MIC is not confident of long term demand justifying capacity expansion; whether the demand originates from the longevity of the Ukraine conflict or from other exportable markets for purposes not related to Ukraine.

    • @vchitnis
      @vchitnis Год назад

      @@anilpopli9184 More interesting than the Ukraine war ad NATO; would be the trajectory the US government and MIC plot for themselves in the forthcoming decades. The US involved itself with Ukraine to scare the Europeans into continuing to agree to host US troops and buying more American weapons. The latter is now in doubt given the vary parlous state of every European economy. Therefore, will the US government be more liberal with export licenses for its MIC? There is some chatter about AUKUS and the Nuclear submarine deal being a test template for the US exporting very high end technologies. For middle to low end technologies, US manufacturing is unaffordable on all continents!

  • @rjvkshl
    @rjvkshl Год назад +3

    Px 🇵🇰 और China की जिस मित्रता को हिमालय से ऊंची, समंदर से गहरी और शहद से ज़्यादा मीठी बताया जा रहा है वह जल्द ही अचार से ज्यादा खट्टी होने वाली है।

  • @aspe12
    @aspe12 Год назад

    Most enlightening talk Narayanan sir. Somewhere you also need to give a talk on why we are so ill equipped to deal with northern front issues. Also recommendations on a countervailing strat.

  • @raghavansrinivas306
    @raghavansrinivas306 Год назад +1

    very informative

  • @selfschool5864
    @selfschool5864 Год назад

    Need to use marker to indicate locations on the map or marking on presentation itself. Otherwise substantial stuff I came across.

  • @ullassharma86
    @ullassharma86 Год назад

    Excellent podcast as always! i am now considering becoming a member of this channel , especially for Gen Rajiv's analysis.
    I have noticed that Indians have a very wrong notion of what 'Quality of life' is and 'standard of living' is. I have seen them connecting both to only infrastructure. This I guess is because humans tend to look at things they dont have.
    Having lived , worked and toured all over east asia and europe , i can tell you that Indian infra is not anyway worse. Its just that we lack the civic responsibility + basic government services like waste management. Its a societal problem that needs to be fixed , unfortunately.

  • @reachbalaiyer
    @reachbalaiyer Год назад +1

    Jai Hind jai bharat

  • @dryogendradjain3304
    @dryogendradjain3304 Год назад +1

    Some thing diffrent🌈👌

  • @kentalwar7615
    @kentalwar7615 Год назад

    Very informative

  • @sanjeevnayyar7063
    @sanjeevnayyar7063 Год назад

    Vg one thks Sir . Indirectly tells about the mess the British created.

  • @OrwellsHousecat
    @OrwellsHousecat Год назад

    Cheers

  • @Beautifulworld-ng6dr
    @Beautifulworld-ng6dr Год назад

    Strong economy is No1 priority of India. It should be always in mind ..only strong economy you can make strong influence in Indo-Pacific ..

  • @hemangkaka8087
    @hemangkaka8087 Год назад +1

    What I understood from this discussion that let GB handled by Pakistan and China so both get stick from TTP.❤❤

  • @rjvkshl
    @rjvkshl Год назад +1

    मेरे विचार में CPEC बनाने के पीछे चीन या Px का कोई trade interest नहीं था जैसा कि ये लोग इतने वर्षों तक गाना गा रहे थे। चीन को Xinxiang और Karakoram के रास्ते अपना सामान Gwadar तक पहुंचाना कितना महंगा पड़ता। इसके वास्तविक aims तो कुछ और ही थे। एक तो ये लोग भारत को Siachen में, J&K में उत्तर और पश्चिम से घेरने की इच्छा रखते थे, दूसरा Px में चीन इस बहाने से अपनी उपस्थिति बनाकर उसे खा जाने का इरादा रखता था। दूसरे इरादे में उसे शायद कुछ सफलता प्राप्त हुई लेकिन अब तो सबकुछ मिट्टी में मिल गया है।

  • @11pke
    @11pke Год назад

    When it comes to Pakistanis, anything and everything is on sale. The only limiting factor is price.

  • @prasadrao7133
    @prasadrao7133 Год назад

    Sir, if china take over gilgit and baiistan then pak never get back and people will suffer like uzger Muslims. Either it has to be with pak or with india or make it as a seperate country. But never merge with china. If it comes into india the people will live democratically and happily. Thank you.

  • @adm7038
    @adm7038 Год назад

    Aadi do you post podcasts?

    • @DEFTALKSbyAadi
      @DEFTALKSbyAadi  Год назад

      Hi didn’t get you. Pls connect with me on email

  • @saikatbaug1937
    @saikatbaug1937 Год назад

    China Pakistan 57 Billion rail corridor discuss about that

  • @m.srajan6306
    @m.srajan6306 Год назад

    🎉please reduce Hindi. Can't understand

  • @johndoe-vc1we
    @johndoe-vc1we Год назад +1

    9:42 I saw a stat for the violence in XJ. From 1991 to 2005 there were over 200 incidents with 165 casualties. I think it was a program on CGTN where this Chinese cop was talking about his CT experiences in XJ when visiting the graves of fallen comrades. I was left with this feeling. Is that it? really. That is all.
    Pales in comparison to what we endured in that time period. In terms of casualties that is like a few months count at the height of the insurgency in J&K. And I ask myself what are the Chinese so so scared of. There is no equivalence between what we endured to what China has experienced. We have lost more police personnel to terrorism than soldiers in all the wars combined since independence. Yet the Chinese behaviour is over the top aggressive. Just imagine if they experience a Pulwama. What will China do.

    • @preethamkumar125
      @preethamkumar125 Год назад

      They might not have experienced Islamic terrorism, but they have experienced Japanese brutality in WW2. So, obviously, they are scared of insurgency in Xinjiang and terrorism.

    • @johndoe-vc1we
      @johndoe-vc1we Год назад

      12:40 Aadi, remember reading a couple of years ago the Chinese have a battalion in Tajikistan near their border to handle this contingency. Aha, here we go, 15:52
      But the border with Pakistan is wide open. So entry into China via the Khunjerab pass must be tightly regulated.

    • @johndoe-vc1we
      @johndoe-vc1we Год назад

      58:43 Haha with oxygen bottles, love the way he rubbished the idea of Chinese pincer through GB. This fear has been animating a bit of commentary about the Chinese presence in GB. In another talk, it was clearly explained the solution to a different pincer or two front was to agree to a mutually beneficial ceasefire at the LOC. Even this ceasefire I remember people were critical of at the time. Why did we agree? Time has shown that was a good decision even if it did benefit the other side

  • @madleon81
    @madleon81 Год назад

    We need GB to ask for independence from Pak 😏

  • @zothansanga3338
    @zothansanga3338 Год назад

    Others laugh at us, we talk and talk. See, how Chinese just control and grasp Uyghurs and Tibetans, they can't do anything. But we, see how they kilk our soldiers