ignorant people getting destroyed in debates

"road to 40.000 SUBSCRIBERS"
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS

[@TrooAgony]

I'll help you out with some analysis on that second Arizona teacher. She clearly is ignorant of her role as a teacher. The teacher is to teach "in loco parentis", meaning "in place of the parent". So, yes, you are actually supposed to teach the basics, and anything outside of that is as the parents would.

[@anthonyverdin6743]

Is your whole RUclips channel based upon you just repeating what the person in the video said!

[@sc33h3o3]

your title is confusing, i thought "woke" was a good thing to be (as opposed to blind/ignorant), to more deeply understand about things worth understanding, an evolved way to be, so not sure what the "joy" or payoff implied by the title would be. also, the guy in the audience had asked a question in earnest, and the man on the podium gave his opinion which may or may not be 100% insightful, how is this "destroying" anyone?