2024 Black Crows Atris Ski Review with SkiEssentials.com

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
  • Black Crows changed up the Atris for 2023 and it's back again for 2024 with just a new topsheet graphic. We've been looking to put together this review for over a year now, and happy to finally get it done. Great narrower-freestyle-inspired-directional-freeride-potential-sidecountry-weapon with some park capabilities thrown in, if you're looking for a succinct description.
    Written Review: www.skiessentials.com/Chairli...
    0:00 - Intro
    4:15 - Construction
    6:10 - Shape
    8:50 - On Snow Impressions
    13:15 - On-Piste Performance
    14:40 - Off-Piste Performance
    17:55 - Park Performance

Комментарии • 139

  • @wyansas
    @wyansas 2 месяца назад +1

    I demoed these one day this winter and thought they were just ok. Felt kind of dead underfoot and not easy to get edge to edge to me.

  • @irwindigital
    @irwindigital Год назад +4

    Thank you! I was just watching your shorter 2023 video on the Atris when you all published this!
    How do you think it compares to the Nordica Unleashed 108?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      That ski definitely came up in conversation. The Unleashed is more at home in a turn while the Atris is happier running straighter and looser. Even though it's a bit wider, the Unleashed 108 is a better carver and is more precise due to the metal laminate and the longer camber profile.

  • @joeybennett1491
    @joeybennett1491 Год назад +2

    Just picked up a pair of these to pair with my Armada Declivity 92s. Couldn’t pass down the price point. Wanted a pair with a shift binding for any touring I can get into and really just a set up for the heavier days in the mountain when the conditions warrant their use.

  • @michaelnite1311
    @michaelnite1311 Год назад +4

    How do these compare to bent 110?

    • @lincolndepagnier360
      @lincolndepagnier360 Год назад +3

      Bent is super soft and way surfier. Atris is much more of a charger and more directional.

    • @adamjagieo347
      @adamjagieo347 Год назад

      bent soft snow, powder days, atris all round , great one quiver piece without metal

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      The 110 is more flexible and freestyle-oriented. The Atris is more business-like and can carve a pretty clean turn when asked. The Bent 110 I would not say the same about.

  • @lorenroot7667
    @lorenroot7667 3 месяца назад

    Couple questions: compared to a Salomon blank or mantra 102? And would a 95b pivot fit on the 184?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  3 месяца назад +1

      The Mantra 102 is the freight train of the group here. No flinching at speed, but heavy and not too floaty. Blank still has some heft to it, but it feels a lot more nimble in the softer snow and tighter spaces. The Atris falls somewhere in the middle--great in soft snow but smooth and fast when pointed down the fall line. The Pivot 95 will be a stretch to fit the Atris in the 184. I have a pair on a 105 and it doesn't fit great. I had to do some trimming of the brake plastic as well as some bending of the arms. Conversely, I don't love the fit of the 115. For 2025, we're going to see a Pivot with a 105 brake, so maybe hold off on that purchase for now?

    • @lorenroot7667
      @lorenroot7667 3 месяца назад

      @@SkiEssentials awesome thanks!

  • @kec2528
    @kec2528 4 месяца назад

    Great review. How are they on groomers?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  4 месяца назад

      The softer the better. I have had a good time on packed powder groomers, but anything firmer than that and I'd rather be on something else. That said, in the 190 on some soft corduroy, they're a blast!

  • @bbkerrC4S
    @bbkerrC4S 4 месяца назад

    Most helpful guys, thx for the comprehensive review.

  • @raphi8444
    @raphi8444 4 месяца назад

    Hi, first of all great review.
    I'm thinking about buying this ski as my first powder ski that I will mostly use in the resort but also want to do occasional touring on (like 80/20 or 70/30 percent ish). What bindings would you recommend for saving weight (as the skis are already on the heavier side for touring) without losing the ability to charge hard when going down the hill? I'm an intermediate to advanced skier, pretty tall and not very heavy. Currently thinking about Shift, Cast and Dynafit Rotation, or maybe there are better options?
    Thanks in advance for the advice!

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  4 месяца назад

      The Shift is the easy answer here because it does it all. If you have a specific need to reduce weight, then something like the Rotation could be brought in to the conversation, but the Shift basically does everything.

  • @carterfan80
    @carterfan80 5 месяцев назад

    Demoed at ppwder mountain. Great float. Tip comes to the top in deep snow. It made turns through some tight ish trees readily.
    It didn't necessarily feel like a twin tip when i skied it. The tail was fairly stable.
    Im 160 lbs and i did not find it heavyvat all. But im likely physically stronger than average 160 lb person.
    Size up imo. As a directional skier I found myself over the tips too often. Good soft snow ski. Probably not much place for it on the east coast. (Imo as a lifelong east coast skier) unless you are looking for youur 4th or 5th pair of skis as a specialist ....

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  5 месяцев назад

      I'm not sizing up on very many skis these days as I age and slow. Atris is still a 190 for me.

    • @carterfan80
      @carterfan80 5 месяцев назад

      @SkiEssentials Yeah. I felt like I could have gone to a hundred and eighty cm ish. I'm only 5'5"

  • @willdrake6646
    @willdrake6646 6 месяцев назад

    Hi Chaps, great informative video, what are your thoughts on this vs the Declivity 102, or even the Sakana or a blade optic? I'm 185cm and 96kg. This would be my single quiver ski, and I want something that is good in the trees and the deep stuff primarily as that's what I enjoy most, but want something I can have a fun day on the groomers when the conditions aren't as good.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  6 месяцев назад

      The Atris is the most playful and soft-snow oriented of the group. It's a great ski, but may leave something to be desired on groomers. The Blade Optic (104 I'm assuming) is pretty heavy and chargey--not the easiest or most forgiving. I love the Declivity and love the Sakana, but they're very different skis. Sakana does some interesting things very, very well, but it's not for everyone. The Declivity is the safer bet here--great both on and off trail with enough width for flotation but a ripping groomer ski.

  • @user-vi6jm7wb7f
    @user-vi6jm7wb7f 8 месяцев назад

    How does the Atris stack up to and ski compared to the old Fischer Ranger 102 fr

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  7 месяцев назад

      Atris is more flexible than the 102 FR, especially in the shovel. The carbon nose in that ski was very responsive while the Atris is a lot more drifty, surfy, and smeary. In soft snow only, I'd ski the Atris, but all other aspects, I really enjoyed that FR.

  • @marklambert8111
    @marklambert8111 8 месяцев назад

    Hey quick question, I’m looking to get freeride skis this season, I’m 5 “6” and 120lbs, do you think that the 2024 Atris or the faction agent 3 would be a better choice for me?( I live in Utah so I’m mostly skiing soft snow)

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  8 месяцев назад

      The Atris is a bit smoother since the Agent employs more camber to the profile. This gives Agent more energy, but it's not quite as floaty/drifty as the Atris. Kind of depends what characteristic you prefer more--both will stand up very well to Utah soft snow conditions.

  • @courtnayromkey2722
    @courtnayromkey2722 9 месяцев назад

    Does Bob have Kastle boots? I love mine!

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  9 месяцев назад +2

      K130P! Love them! The best skiing boot I've ever had.

    • @courtnayromkey2722
      @courtnayromkey2722 9 месяцев назад

      @@SkiEssentials I’ve got the 120s. The liners are top notch.

  • @hughdavidson4069
    @hughdavidson4069 11 месяцев назад +1

    Would the Atris be a good hard charger on bigger softer/variable snow lines (1-2 feet of snow)? or would the Anima be worth the big size upgrade? Already ski on Serpo's so really just looking for a wider ski that would be good for charging bigger lines? Thanks

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  10 месяцев назад +1

      Yes, that's right in the Atris's wheelhouse. There's a good amount of stability and power and will make a great soft snow ski. It's incredibly playful and floaty and offers a totally different feel from the Serpo.

  • @LeftField92
    @LeftField92 Год назад +1

    Hi guys, I'm looking at getting a one ski do it all and am tossing it up between this (2023 version) and the Line blade optic 104. Any thoughts between the two skis would be great thanks!

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +2

      The Atris is more consistent from tip to tail while the Blade Optic is more flexible and floaty in the ends of the ski. I'd say that the Line is more stout underfoot and the metal does make it a very smooth ski, it's just not as predictable from a playfulness perspective as the Atris. I think to do it all, the Atris makes a bit more sense, but these are both very strong options.

  • @proverbalizer
    @proverbalizer Год назад +1

    not quite a fan of the new look. Actually makes it look thicker in the middle though

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      We've got a deal on the 2023's with bindings if you're interested!
      www.skiessentials.com/2023-black-crows-atris-skis-w-marker-griffon-13-id-bindings.html

  • @jarrodbaker9446
    @jarrodbaker9446 Год назад +2

    I’m very indecisive right now. I have a pair of enforcer 100s 193. Love them on groomers but, find myself completely drained getting them through trees and bumps. Im 6’2 240(athletic) advanced/expert skiier that likes to go fast. Deciding between 104 free and the new atris. I’m liking the idea of a more floaty poppy ski that can also rip groomers. I understand, from your reviews, that the 104 free is better on groomers but, is it significantly better?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +3

      I think it's pretty significantly better. The two sheets of metal combine really well with the shape to make it a very round and clean turner. The Atris is fine, but I wouldn't say that groomer performance is a strength at all.

  • @erinb4919
    @erinb4919 Год назад

    Have you skied the older version atris back to back on powder with the new version? I have the 2020 atris with a shift, which is my main daily driver for skiing Rockies and Purcells in the Canadian west. I also have the Animas for deep resort days. I love the ski for its surfiness and looseness, predictability on steeps and great powder float for its width, with a high top end speed on powder... I demoed the new version 2022 on a firm day. There is quite a difference in profile. Less tip/tail rocker and more camber. Thus as expected, skiis better on piste, faster edge to edge on hard pack. But I would expect the float and looseness on powder to be compromised... My impression is that BC wanted a ski with broader market applicability, ie skiing more on piste vs a ski meant more for powder and steeps... But maybe this isn't the case? Have you done any back to back testing?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      Not true back to back, but definitely year to year. I think they wanted to create a bit more difference between Anima and Atris, hence making it narrower and more on-piste oriented. If you're looking for a floatier Atris, if you can find the older version, I'd go that route, but I like what they've done with the profile from an all-mountain perspective.

  • @thomaspanos
    @thomaspanos Год назад +22

    I purchased the 2023 model prior to the start of this ski season. I've got around 10 days on them so far. Skied exclusively on Blackcomb/Whistler. It's like these things were designed and built to be skied on these Canadians mountains. They are superb in the powdery steeps. The float is fantastic and the shape/camber allow you to turn with confidence and energy. They are also amazing in the chop. Skied these over the past couple of days in 2-foot powder and I couldn't find a single fault. Soft moguls, steeps, chopped up groomers. These things absolutely RIP on soft snow. If you are looking for a soft-snow big mountain ski, this one is hard to find any fault with. Bravo BC. Amazing product.

    • @sandercronberg4155
      @sandercronberg4155 11 месяцев назад

      Pretty sure it’s made to be skied in the alps…..

    • @benprofiri8974
      @benprofiri8974 9 месяцев назад

      alps have less snow@@sandercronberg4155

    • @carterfan80
      @carterfan80 5 месяцев назад

      Curious if you had the opportunity to ski them in firm conditions? I had trouble getting them to bite on firm steep slopes. They washed out. I'm pretty good at setting an edge. Been sking new york and vermont for thirty years In terrible conditions.

    • @thomaspanos
      @thomaspanos 5 месяцев назад

      @@carterfan80 I skied them on firm steeps at Whistler/Blackcomb just 10 days ago. They were lovely. I find they prefer a more neutral/slightly forward stance to get the best grip out of them. They do need to be turned over with the ankles more than others, from what I've seen. They have great energy transfer between turns once you find out their sweet spot.

    • @carterfan80
      @carterfan80 5 месяцев назад +1

      @thomaspanos Good feedback. I think I needed to go one size longer. That was definitely part of the problem. I think i'm just used to much more narrow skis with tons of edge grip when i'm on firm conditions.. kastle mx, k2 disruption, kendo etc.... I know it's nowhere near a direct comparison. But that's what i'm used to. I didn't have confidence in them. But maybe I just needed more time on them.

  • @NoProDad
    @NoProDad Год назад +1

    Nice review

  • @matth3903
    @matth3903 Год назад

    Looking for the best mix of a playful ski that is good in chop/crud, stable yet has a loose back end. Needs to be able to handle variable snow including firmer days here and there. Out of Atris, Qst 106, Blade Optic 104 or something else what is my best bet?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      You're in the right zone for sure--any of these skis meet your needs. I'd say the metal of the Line sets it apart from the others, and delivers a very stable and powerful platform while keeping the tips and tails nice and playful for softer snow.

  • @anguslomas8220
    @anguslomas8220 Год назад +3

    The 108 version is my favourite it's a proper powder ski. Disappointed they dropped it. 105 to the next ski at 116 is a big gap.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      I can certainly understand that. It is a fairly big gap in widths between Atris and Anima now.

    • @proverbalizer
      @proverbalizer Год назад

      have you skied the 105 yet? seems like the vast majority of people actually like it more

  • @brianpae
    @brianpae Год назад

    Wow, ugly

  • @coobanez777
    @coobanez777 Год назад +3

    Love my Atris! I'm running a Dynafit Rotation mounted +1 just on mine and it's really good. However, with more money and if it was my one ski quiver, I would have gone for the Pivot+Cast free touring set up - especially if spending most of the time on the resort.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      Atris + Cast would be pretty incredible.

    • @proverbalizer
      @proverbalizer Год назад

      As I'm watching more and more gear videos, Atris and Cast does indeed seem like the perfect one ski quiver combination for back front and side country

  • @michaelnite1311
    @michaelnite1311 Год назад +1

    what’s a good ski that’s directional for trees in deep snow?

    • @carterfan80
      @carterfan80 5 месяцев назад

      Head kore series 111 or 117. Love kore 105. Just Go a bit wider than me

  • @christorealov9050
    @christorealov9050 Год назад

    Wait - Jeff actually skis? I thought he is more focused on rollerblading and complaining about parking these days...

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +2

      I don't even know how to respond to that! Ski almost every day, almost never complain about parking. ***Insert confused and laughing emoji***

  • @michaelnite1311
    @michaelnite1311 Год назад

    how do these compare to saloman qst blanks skis?

  • @michaelnite1311
    @michaelnite1311 Год назад +1

    how are these in tight trees with deep snow

    • @adamjagieo347
      @adamjagieo347 Год назад

      can do it , but no chance with bent 110 or line 108v or dynafit 108 m- free

    • @michaelnite1311
      @michaelnite1311 Год назад +1

      @@adamjagieo347 what do you mean no chance like are the bent 110s really good or really bad?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      As I said in my other reply, they're great in trees and deeper snow, you just need to have reasonably good technique.

  • @ryana3095
    @ryana3095 Год назад +3

    Bought these from you guys based on recommendations from your Black Friday livestream to complement my Deacon 84s. Man, they are fun. I have a blast on these out west. Thank you!

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      Awesome! Love to hear a success story like that. Have a great rest of your season!

  • @jonklass
    @jonklass Год назад +3

    I'm in the process of purchasing a new pair of skis to be my one ski quiver for trips out west and right now I've got it narrowed down to Atris, QST 106 and M-Free 108. I would love to know what Jeff's choice would be since I'm pretty much the same size and think I have similar ski tendencies. Thanks for the review once again!!

    • @fencejack
      @fencejack Год назад +1

      What is your skiing like? I actually tested those three skis a month ago and walked away with the atris. It was a close choice between atris and qst. The mfree were super fun off piste but were too loose for me on groomers. In terms of looseness I would say mfree-qst-atris from most to least. That's not to say atris are difficult to turn though. I was actually looking for something very maneuverable but can hold well on groomers if needed and atris ended up being my choice. Hope that helps.

    • @anguslomas8220
      @anguslomas8220 Год назад +1

      Buy the atris. I have the 108 atris and 106 qst and much prefer the atris. The qst is considerably better on groomers. However, the atris is just so much fun, plus they lowered the waist width anyway.

    • @jonklass
      @jonklass Год назад +1

      @@anguslomas8220 Thanks for the advice.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      Seems like you got some great advice here, John! Sorry I didn't get back to you more quickly. All 3 of those are so fun, although I'd probably go either Atris or QST for more versatility. Never know what you'll encounter on a trip. As fencejack points out, the M-Free gets a little loose in some situations.
      So, for me personally, since you asked what I would choose, I'd have a really hard time deciding between Atris and QST. Sometimes I feel like QST matches my skiing style better as it's a touch easier to flick out the tail, but I also appreciate the strength in the tail of the Atris. It's a toss up for sure! Regardless of which you choose, I'm sure you'll be quite pleased.

  • @rm8262
    @rm8262 Год назад +3

    2023, and I didn’t think Black Crows could make a worse graphic. 2024, hold my beer.

    • @adamjagieo347
      @adamjagieo347 Год назад +3

      at least it's not white :)

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      Some of the 2024 graphics are excellent. I can certainly understand this one being a bit polarizing.

  • @patryka11
    @patryka11 Год назад +6

    Absolutely excellent review. Fantastic! You guys are amazing!

  • @ravenman7876
    @ravenman7876 Год назад +2

    I would love to know which skii is better and in which area... Im comparing atris and camox from Black crows, thank you for the reply

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      Atris is considerably better in soft snow, and feels stronger out of the tail too, which might be counter intuitive in how one thinks about ski performance. Camox is quicker edge to edge and I'd say a superior carving ski, despite it not being quite as strong. Camox is also more freestyle-capable, especially in a groomed terrain park, not necessarily a BC jump or something like that.

  • @onecutmedia
    @onecutmedia Год назад +4

    Best skis I have ever skied on out here at Whistler

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +4

      Boy if someone said I had to ski an Atris in Whistler for an entire season, I would... thank them repeatedly.

  • @idlogin
    @idlogin Год назад +4

    I'll be interested on your thoughts of the comparison between these and the new 2024 Blizzard Rustler 10, thanks

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      I need to spend a little more time on the Rustler 10, to be honest, but they're definitely in the same league. Both are strong skis with a good amount of maneuverability and playfulness. I think Rustlers feel more surfy in general. Looser tail. I'm looking forward to testing the new Rustler 10 more. I've skied the 9 a lot more than the 10 at this point.

  • @philippefagnant1841
    @philippefagnant1841 Год назад +1

    I wonder how much it cost to put a little "statement" on the side wall...

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +2

      My guess would be something like $0.40 per ski, but good question!

    • @proverbalizer
      @proverbalizer Год назад

      I wonder how much it will cost to erase it, lol

  • @darinsmith2458
    @darinsmith2458 Год назад +2

    my guess is those have a similar feel to the QST 106s and my DPS F100s

    • @fencejack
      @fencejack Год назад +1

      I actually tested the 106 and atris back to back. I ended up buying the atris. It was very close though. The 106 felt a bit more damp but the atris felt a bit more fun and energetic. Atris is easy to turn but I think the 106 was just a bit looser, which I think is why the atris felt better for me on groomers. I believe the atris has a longer turning radius as well which allows for a bit longer turns which I enjoy more on groomers. Honestly though, you could go either way and be super happy. I kept changing my mind between the two but had to pull the trigger on one.

  • @bertrandverlhac9388
    @bertrandverlhac9388 Год назад +5

    Great review as always. I used to be a big Atris guy but with the previous version I felt I wasn't getting enough ski on groomers and not enough float on deep pow days, so I switched for a Justis/Anima combo which I love, but will definitely look to try those.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      Hard to argue against the Justis/Anima combo, both sweet skis, but I do like how Black Crows addressed what people thought could be better about the Atris. Definitely a step up in responsiveness on groomers.

  • @martin-1576
    @martin-1576 Год назад +1

    Test the faction dancer 4 please

  • @Waffleir0n
    @Waffleir0n Год назад +22

    It seems to do really well with a tech binding for Nikolai Schirmer, but I’m sure he can tour any ski 😂 love the review guys!!

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +2

      I always get a kick out of pros mounting tech bindings on kinda burly skis and thinking about the public perception. "Well he can do it!"

    • @oscarpreuss2347
      @oscarpreuss2347 Год назад +1

      Sorry for all my comments, but I’m curious to ask what you meant by that? Would you say that pros make this sort of combo look easier than it really is? Just asking because I’ve been watching Nikolai’s channel and thinking about putting a tech binding on the arris too

    • @benshorthouse2979
      @benshorthouse2979 Год назад

      @@oscarpreuss2347 All i'd recommend is testing out before doing it, heavy skis with some light bindings is asking for a higher difficulty of use

    • @wesleymoore2548
      @wesleymoore2548 Год назад

      @@oscarpreuss2347 its 100% fine for a touring ski. "Kinda burly" translates to heavier than other touring specific skis in its class. That said it would be a sick ski with some ATK bindings or G3 Ions.

    • @Blastoplastify
      @Blastoplastify Год назад +1

      @@oscarpreuss2347 just as a general tip, i wouldn't base your choices off what pro skiers do. Never mind pushing a sponsorship, they are obviously incredible skiers that could ski a plank of wood, for us hobby skiers we need to make different choices.

  • @fredgroos7967
    @fredgroos7967 Год назад +5

    108s are my favorite skis of all time when the conditions call for it...I hate how much more I like the ski in a 105 when I demoed them this year

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      Hahaha, I hear ya. Trust your gut! If you skied it in the 105 width and loved it, try not to think about the difference in width! I succumb to similar emotions, but usually best to try to push those aside.

  • @BrandonMeyer1641
    @BrandonMeyer1641 Год назад +2

    Enjoy the snow that’s coming guys. I will certainly be making the most of it after the first bit is finished rolling through.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      Thanks! Sorry for the delay getting back to you, but so nice having some fresh snow around here now!

  • @src248
    @src248 Год назад +3

    Having "welcome to the metaverse" on the sidewall is a deal breaker for me

    • @Waffleir0n
      @Waffleir0n Год назад

      Haha, it’s a joke dude! Have you seen their other sidewall one-liners?? Google it and have a laugh 🤣

    • @minergod9031
      @minergod9031 Год назад +1

      Hard it’s gay

    • @proverbalizer
      @proverbalizer Год назад +1

      did they have that on the 2023 color? I would specifically search those out if it doesn't, plus you can probably get a better discount anyway for the exact same ski

    • @src248
      @src248 Год назад +1

      @@proverbalizer The 2023 says "there is no more toilet paper" iirc

  • @erichharvey
    @erichharvey Год назад +8

    Just bought Mirus Cor, loved your review helped sell it. I'm more of a wider skiier in the west, BC, but the Mirus Cor is for those boring thaw days or lack of soft snow. Love the ski, supper fun and supper fun in the park.

    • @michaelnite1311
      @michaelnite1311 Год назад

      how is it on ice and in trees?

    • @coobanez777
      @coobanez777 Год назад

      I went for the Captis for resort and hard pack days, but the Mirus Cor looks like an awesome resort ski!

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      Mirus Cor is so awesome! I (Jeff) have been skiing it a bunch in the past 3-4 weeks and we're going to put together a longer video like this one on them soon. Such a unique tool and so much you can do on it.

  • @phonemeunit1973
    @phonemeunit1973 Год назад +6

    I went +2cm on mine and feel like I hit the jackpot. Love the Atris.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      Feel like that's a great spot if you want a slightly more balanced feel, but don't want to give up directional performance.

    • @O_hAn
      @O_hAn 6 месяцев назад

      What is your style of skiing? just curious because I want to mount in the same spot. I'm coming from a park background, and as I get older I find myself skiing switch a little less every year. but still love the feel of a balanced ski.

  • @rickden8362
    @rickden8362 Год назад +1

    My first impression is that the white ski sold like sh*t. Looking at the marginal spec difference, I'd buy the black/yellow after passing on the silly white model. OK, it's kind of petty, but when ''I'' see little/no difference, looks matter when there are a lot of options out there.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      I agree, looks matter, even if it's somewhat superficial.

  • @philiplacey5430
    @philiplacey5430 Год назад +1

    100 percent!🙂

  • @fencejack
    @fencejack Год назад +2

    Recently bought the 2023 Atris and your review is bang on how I felt about the skis and for how I plan to use them. I plan to use these as my every day west coast ski and when it snows a bit more on the east coast. What would be a good compliment wider ski for those slightly deeper days out west? I tested the QST Blank and thought they were great but wasn't sure if I could expect that much better deep snow performance with only being 7mm wider?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +1

      QST Blank might be a little too close in width, I agree. Sometimes I like the idea of sticking within one brand once you've found a ski you really like. For instance, the Nocta would be an excellent complement to the Atris for super deep days. You can imagine the conversations that happened around making sure those skis can coexist within Black Crows organization, and I always think that translates nicely to real world application too. I'd at least go to 115 mm underfoot just to get some separation from the Atris. Hope that helps!

    • @fencejack
      @fencejack Год назад

      ​@SkiEssentials thanks for the response. I came across a killer deal on a pair of Icelantic Nomad 115... any thoughts on how they'll feel? I really enjoy the atris and would like something more deep snow focus but a bit more slashy and smeary. Something with a tad more heft to handle chopped conditions too. If you think the nocta fits that bill then so be it. Also, any reco for binding with it? Thanks!

  • @timhowrigan8238
    @timhowrigan8238 Год назад +1

    I love these skis. Had the 108s, now I’m using 2023 with the cast system, so much fun. Daily driver at Smuggs.

  • @kristinniebergall1335
    @kristinniebergall1335 Год назад

    How do these compare to the line blade optic 104?

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      The Line is a stiffer ski thanks to the metal laminate, but they do share a lot of similar properties as far as shape and profile--the Line is more gradual in profile, so will feel a bit smoother in a carved turn on firmer snow.

  • @va7796
    @va7796 Год назад +69

    wow that topsheet design is a downgrade from last yr 😕

    • @InsideAlps
      @InsideAlps Год назад +2

      oh yeah, terrible.

    • @christorealov9050
      @christorealov9050 Год назад +13

      Disagree. I hate any sort of white skis as I think that's highly impractical if you lose a ski in deep snow. glad they changed the top sheet. I have the 2016 version (108 with 18 m turn radius) and still think that's the best graphic with the 3D chevrons.

    • @henrikehrnst1864
      @henrikehrnst1864 Год назад +2

      Agree. What the fuck did they do with it

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад +9

      Hot topic here! I prefer last year's white--very clean looking!

    • @rm8262
      @rm8262 Год назад +7

      2022 Atris is by far the best looking ski. Glad I have a pair!!

  • @christophermagnuson1270
    @christophermagnuson1270 Год назад +1

    Oh boy is this great !⛷❄️

  • @johnsen305
    @johnsen305 Год назад

    What jacket is Jeff wearing at the start? Looks great.

    • @SkiEssentials
      @SkiEssentials  Год назад

      In the intro, he's got a Strafe Sickbird one-piece suit. He was skeptical at first about the one piece, but has grown to enjoy it.