TOP 5 POKER RIVER CARDS OF ALL TIME!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 авг 2024
- Help us to 100K Subscribers - goo.gl/Bvsafo
If you are reading this, comment...
● Watch other Videos:
► Bluffs Gone Wrong - • 3 POKER BLUFFS GONE EX...
► Phil Ivey Wins $2,200,000 - • Phil Ivey Runs Like A ...
► Top Straight Flushes - • TOP 5 POKER STRAIGHT F...
► Best Poker Quads - • TOP 3 POKER QUADS HAND...
This is exactly every hand I play on Poker Stars online.
Woah… exactly, every, hand
🤣
😂😂👌👌
u remember ur bad beats more than ur bad play prior to it
It’s just sickening when your playing tournament and some shit crazy happens and u get a bad beat
The whole poker world wasn't just cheering for that 6, *the whole poker world is STILL cheering for that 6.*
The title gives it away but i still cheered like mad when the six came on the river in the first clip. Poker justice right there!!!
I might be stupid, but what did the guy do wrong?
@@woif00 He took ages "thinking" about whether or not to call when he flopped a really strong hand and any muppet knows to go all in here with a flush on the flop. Essentially wasting everyone's time and not really respecting the other players, hence the justice when he gets beaten by the full house on the river.
@Brendan Wood And we all know there is no way he would, he COULD, ever fold this hand. He's the short stack. He flopped the nuts. What the fuck!!??
Disgraceful?? Lmao
I feel that they over reacted to say he was being “disgraceful” imo
That 1st hand is one of the most beautiful things I've ever seen!!!
I was so confused by that one didn’t adreus have him beet the whole time
Why was his reaction disgraceful? I don't get it
@@MudStuffin it's disgraceful because AA is the BEST starting hand you can have in the game their playing & it's an etiquette thing. When you have premium holdings it's not a mystery as to what you're going to do & it's super disrespectful to take 5minutes making a decision that's a no brainer!! You're NEVER folding in the spot that douche-hole was in so why pointlessly drag shit out when you & everyone else in the room already know what you're going to do when holding AA at a final table facing a preflop jam! Unnecessary & classless or he really is a complete moron who luck-boxed his way to the final table. His teammates probably got him to that spot idk tho.... Either way it's not a good look 🤦♂️🖕that guy lol
@@MudStuffin He has literally the best hand it's possible to have on that flop, and sits there for 3 minutes thinking about calling all in, with the STONE COLD NUTS. He can't be behind, it's literally impossible, and there is no way he is ever going to fold. So sitting acting like he has a decision is just dumb
@@pandabearguy1 dumb yes but disgusting and disgraceful? I think it was an over reaction from them all
Phil Hellmuth actually gets lucky on the river once.....im impressed
:D :D
Haha
Still whines about it
Phil you odiot
@@user-wj9xp3fy8y lol are you sure you don't want to edit that comment a little?
stupid KQ flush slow roll got river justice
I dunno about that. I didn't see it as slow playing. Tournaments are different. You might think he's already got trips and you want to decide whether you REALLY want to risk it all on whether or not the board pairs...I'd think about it too. If the difference is like $50K in a tournament, you might WANT to wait and think about it a sec.
Stephen Henley He had the nuts. There is never a reason to fold when you have the nuts, ever. Also, his opponent couldn’t have had trips when the board didn’t have a pair.
Stephen Henley dude I am taking about flop; He is all in to call and he has nuts. it doesn’t matter which tournament you in, it is a snap call.
@@stephenhenley7452 bs , thats what people call instant call
@@marcosvidal1293 As someone who's played in 1000+ person tournaments, no
The guy to the right of Andreas who is clapping very enthousiastically at 4:18 cracked me up so hard haha. 100% deserved
He was more happy than Don! :))
Never seen a slow roll that bad before...never!
What did he do wrong, like I've never played poker so I don't know what he did wrong
@@ubisoft_is_ass7740 Its called slow roll in a definite call situation which is disrespectful in poker
Rightfully so, if that 6 hadn't hit he might have been lynched, disgraceful slow roll
0:42 Declan folded 10/6 offsuit so there was one less 6 in the deck. So at 3:44, when they said he had 4 outs, he actually had only 3.
No he still had 4 outs? two aces and the two 6s
@@michaeltaliau1673 There was one six on the board and one in his hand. One was folded which means only one left can exist in the deck. That plus the two aces in the deck is 3 outs. Look at the timestamps I linked.
@@brontesenthcorrect
Gotta respect laak, hes there for a good time not a long time
Huh first time I’ve ever seen Phil win a hand on youtube
you guys just witnessed phil hellmuth's first win according to youtube!! incredible!!!!
Sick video. One of the best I've ever seen.
Not sure what year it was, but the hand at the WSOP main event where one guy rivered quad As and it gave the other guy the Royal Flush. Now THAT was a river card for the ages. Yep, got busted in the main event with Quad A.
Mabuchi "Gambo" vs Justin Phillips. .
I feel like if that happens to you, you deserve some sort of prize lol that was brutal
How do you not have Connor Drinan vs. Cary Katz in there? AA vs AA in a $1,000,000 buy in and dude gets flushed out on the river? C'mon...
That river ace changed the face of poker forever.
And it destroyed pool halls in America
SMaze17 how much was riding on that one hand? Butterfly effect for real!
You know you're right. That might be the most influential card in the history of the game. Very fitting that it's the ace of spades.
How so?
Why do u say that
Beware, the outro is legit twice as loud as video
Jeff King read this .5 seconds before outro... my eardrums thank you
I don’t play poker but have been watching the videos on this channel after seeing it in my recommendations so slowly grasping of how it works. Just one question though: In the Andreas vs Donnacha game, why was what Andreas did considered disrespectful? Thanks in advance.
He flopped the "nuts" with KdQd which is the best possible hand you can have on that board.
It's considered disrespectful because his equity to win the hand is always higher than his opponent.
Worst case scenario is if villain flopped a set of let's say aces, although KdQd would been slightly a 65% favourite.
In this scenario he was a 82% favourite to win the hand.
In any scenario given- Andreas would have the nuts(best possible hand) on that board and he's thinking about the call - that's why it's considered disrespectful. You dont fold the best hand when you to a 100% know you have it, he was just slowrolling for some reason.
Aaaaaaand he's a shortstack with less than 4 big blinds which makes the whole situation even more ridiculous.
Simon Todorovic Gotcha, understood. Yeah that’s in pretty bad taste of Andreas but justice was swiftly served
@@simontodorovic287 so, what was actually disrespectful? what should he have done differently?
@@VU212009 instant call would have been the suitable option. You don't fold the hand when you can be 100% sure you have the best hand available in the situation, so there is no need to slowroll like he did.
Also, he was raised all in so there was no reason to hollywood because there was no continuation bet for his opponent to do.
So, there was no reason for any hesitation except for some TV time. That is considered very disrespectful of your opponent and to the game.
Moneymaker's run for the wsop main event title is just so ridiculous, I mean sure those are all set ups and what not, but there were so much two outers, three outers and what not, jeez :D
That 1st clip, I think the guy just really didn't know what he was doing.... He didn't realize after seeing his opponents hand that he needed 2avoid an A or 6... He was unsure or unaware rather, of his stack size in relation 2da blinds and other stacks @table... He wasn't being an A hole
100% true. He is just a massive fish. You can clearly see that due to his reaction and preflop play. People's emotions are misinterpreting the situation. Stfu
If he would of actually folded he would of been alive still lol. I don’t shame his slow roll if he was actually contemplating folding because of intuition on losing lol. I once folded a top set on a rainbow flop in a 2/5 game only to would have lost too a flush against two players on a run out. I had a weird feeling even with top set and that feeling was right and I saved a stack of about 1700$
@@pitchbuckets2860 intuition is the #1 attribute on the felt
Peter Eastgate rivering a one-outter against Scott Montgomery in the Main Event deserves a spot. It gave Eastgate the bracelet.
What happened in the first clip wtf I’m so confused
andreas was enjoying his flush "win", taking his time trying to act like he is thinking it over when in reality all he could've done was either fold or call. It was a dick move because nobody would fold with his cards, but he was savoring the moment with his acting
Hollywooding before an all-in call with the nuts is ridiculous and stupid.
That last one with Phil Laak was so brutal
it looks like the first guy didnt even understood that he lost the hand , maybe he just doesnt know how poker works 😂
i need more of matt vasgersian commentating poker
How does Mizrahi (AQ) vs Jarvis (99) not make #1 on this list. Final table WSOP All in preflop. Flop QQ8, 9 on the turn, Ace on the river. SICK!
because there's like a milion of similar hands and this is just one random video on youtube that chose 5 of them
this is when poker is straight luck
Takes skill to get to those moments tho
Nathaniel Hester no it doesn’t
Ok Boomer
Nathaniel Hester shut up zoomer
the ignorance is real here.
Nice to see Phil on the other end of this for once.
That first one was a bad flop turning into a poker miracle
this andreas guy didnt meant to be rude or sth, he was just a big fish and did barely know the rules
What did the guy do that was so disrespectful?
He slow rolled the opponent. After the flop he had flush, the top combination possible at that point of time, with chances of opponent having shot at winning very low, yet he pretended he was thinking whether to go all in. Such a behavior is considered disrespectful.
@@nikaburduli1589 meh people are such cry babies.
@Rodrigo C. It’s because he was wasting everybody’s time. If the bet wasn’t going to put him all in then fair enough, drag it out and make it look like you actually a decision to make. But doing it like he did was very shitty
That 6 was and still is absolutely beautiful
2:07 thats mesmerizing
Last hand: Phil: "I'd be okay with it", all smiles. No, brother. NONE OF US would be okay with it, and you obviously were not okay with it.
Mabuchi v Phillips at the WSOP 2008 Main Event, river comes Ace of diamonds, Mabuchi makes quad aces, Phillips a Royal Flush.
in wsop some years ago, on the river, an ace came out which gave someone 4 of a kind, but it gave the other player a straight flush. That should have been on here
man just saw chris moneymake at lake tahoe ...must say this was the first time I started watching poker ...I clearly remember this hand.
4:00 If that old man were against me in PokerStars for sure he will get four aces.
4:22 Watch the moment where one player loses:
-The tournament
-All form of respect from other players
-All his fans (except the ones a normale person wouldn't even want)
All that is just a few minutes 😵💫
Looks like Phil may have left Moneymaker hanging after he got eliminated....handshake denied.
That was the river card that changed poker history forever.
Bigga Winna Crapsa whys that? Asking for a friend ..
@@fedfreds832 The term was created after Chris Moneymaker, a 27-year-old accountant and amateur poker player from Tennessee, United States, outlasted 838 other players to win the 2003 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Event, thereby winning the US$2.5 million prize and the title of World Champion.[1] Moneymaker became the new poster boy for poker, inspiring potential players to believe that "staying at home in front of a computer screen could be more profitable than going to work."[1] His improbable win also started a new era in poker in which "a nobody could topple the feared pros."[3]
According to an article in the Las Vegas Sun, Moneymaker's victory has been credited with launching the "poker craze", along with assistance from televised tournaments with hole-card cameras and the increased popularity of online poker.[4]
Moneymaker gained entrance to the 2003 World Series of Poker by winning a $86 poker satellite tournament at the online poker card room PokerStars. This win gave him a seat at a table in a larger satellite tournament whose grand prize was a seat at the World Series of Poker in Las Vegas, Nevada, which costs $10,000. Moneymaker won that tournament and went on to compete in the 2003 WSOP event.
Enforcados Futebol Clube gotchu just the underdog unknown name from a small city won one of the biggests poker tournaments. Crazy
@@fedfreds832 In context, he had a cooler last name.
Lol Ivey over there like "SHIT! SHIT!!!"
At 3:00 the guy's reaction to seeing the cards is amazing.
Crazy that the Ace changed poker forever
damn i was rooting for ivey
Facts
When Phil turned the full house and then moneymaker got the nut full house on the river, holy shit.
Nut full house would be aces full, doesnt really matter tho
This is like every other hand I play in PokerBaazi
4:05 When commentator thinks that 7 on the river makes that justice lol😂
K high flush did play slow roll ? Damn it!
Hey Honey, he called all in with 99... He's the wor... Oh hey, what a great day!
everyone doesn't know but if moneymaker doesn't hit that ace Phil wins that tournament
I don't understand the boo's and "What are you doing you idiot?" in 3:05 someone explain why showing his hand was uphauling?
so basically the guy had the absolute nuts on the board (which means he has the best possible hand at that time) and he was going to call anyway but he just took his time to kinda rub it in. It's something called slowrolling which is a very douche thing to do.
De Wolfe face always get me so happy and cheerful to straight anger and regret
Was Andreas really slow rolling since he flopped the nuts but would of still lost regardless ? Maybe he had an intuition that he would lose lol
He had the stone cold nuts on the flop
Everyone would’ve snap called that also he didn’t have much left so he wasted time for no reason
They are just babies, "waaaaah he took too long to call waaaaah" they need to get over themselves
Monetize much?
I have been knocked out of 2 of my last 3 tournaments by people hitting one-outers on the river. Like, what the h-e-double-toothpicks is going on?!
So…clearly there was a legitimate reason the first guy was tanking so long on the all in call. He was asking himself if I flopped the nuts, and my hand literally cannot improve, what would the guy have or be drawing into that is putting me all in? Full house, clearly, or even an open ended straight flush draw was available as well. Sure he currently has both those beat, but for his tournament life? Usually you want to know you will win or have already won before you opt for an all in in such stakes.
Everyone giving him crap for taking so long to call, when actually, if he folded, or called, everyone would have told him he made the wrong play, even a snap call is the “right” play would lose in these circumstances. Sure it’s a strong hand, but it’s not a guaranteed win. It’s just the nuts after the flop. When you flip the nuts you are nearly always playing for immediate “value” because you want people to pay dearly for their draws. Clearly the other guy was better on draws, not having the good position to tell if he was into a flush before pushing him all in. Basically if he didn’t have a flush or trips, he was folding, but with a 2 pair on the flop, is still nearly a 1in5 of hitting a boat.
He has the nuts bruh there’s zero reason to ever fold that on the flop… if you’re ever folding the nuts on the flop then poker isn’t for you
Phil Ivey dont shake hands
This is why I hate playing poker online...it has happened so many times to me, but I love poker so I keep playing.
I can say I've seen enough pocket 9s losing to pocket Q's.
Anyone else see Ivey pass on the moneymaker handshake? Lol
Chris Moneymaker always has an expression like someone peed in his whisky.
@3:34 it shows there are only four outs (AA66). What if next two cards are 8 and 8 (of spade and heart) that will also give a full house to Donnacha.
It doesn’t show double gutter outs. If he would have hit an 8 on the turn it would have shown that as one of his outs on the screen
If an 8 came, then the "outs" would be updated and they would add an 8 for 5 outs total. They don't compute 2 cards ahead and show every possible winning formula, just what would swing the win on the next card.
If it truly was the “Stone Cold Nuts” then he couldn’t of lost. It was the nuts but it was beatable like we all saw.
If that truly was the case then he is a moron. Folding after flopping the nuts is a losing play no matter what, and no one should ever even consider a fold in that situation. But he's obviously not a beginner player, I can't think of any logical reason to take this long to put it in when you're a 4 to 1 favorite to double up in the worst case scenario.
Andreas if you are reading this can i just say : Hahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaa.
If Phil hellmuth had a little bit of luck on his side he would have been completely unbeatable
Phil Ivey salty and ignoring the handshake
alles klar that these muppets shouldn't be commentating on tv
why
GREAT VIDEO................
you can say whatever you want about Phil Hellmuth, but he did remain classy when he DID win the pot. Unline Moneymaker, for example.
Sands took that river card like a champ.
I hate when they say only aces or 6 could save the hand when two 8s is also possible
Poor Ivey, I feel so bad for him there
Not as bad as I felt for Laak at the end though, I love that dude, he's super cool and nice all the time.
The only video on RUclips Phil Hellmuth actually wins
Losing on the river is the worst feeling
10:15 If you walk away from the table like a sore loser before the river, you should forfeit the hand.
The first one is the best
Seein the thumbnail I’m thinking KQ suited bad beat how unlucky but after seein the slow roll justice is real
3:07 what did he even do that was so wrong? I’m new to watching poker videos. Is there something I’m missing?
They're mad that hes taking so long even when he's sure to win
yeah the guy has the post flop nuts but still chooses to put a bit of an act on. no need for it.
Dwan wasn't right walking off before the hand was played out. Most gamblers are superstitious and that was asking for something to happen and Dwan knew that.
Even after seeing the first clip so many times, i still cant help but smile
Garrett why are they all so happy when that guy loses
Dale Prokop because he had the best hand at the time, and his opponent went all in so there was no action behind him to try and bait in. So he was just wasting time. Its whats called a “slow roll” Its extremely poor etiquette to slow roll
I feel like that first guy didn't slowroll, he looks like he didn't even realize it was on him...
He obviously did….
Вообще крутые моменты🔥
Phil ivey looking like young drake
Definitely not the top 5 river cards. Suppose you river an ace of hearts to give you quad aces and it ends up being the card that beats you. Saw it happen. Player was winning with 3 aces and his opponent had 4 hearts to a straight flush needing the ace of hearts on the river.
Can somebody explain why the commentators in the first clips are against the German guy?
4:35 stone cold nuts means a 100% guarantee not 82%
Doug Polk at 13:14
"...of all time" ...yeh right!
When the fuck did Matt Vasgersian announce poker
Phil Laak didn’t deserve that.
New to poker. What did Andreas do in the first clip that was so disgraceful? I’m very confused watching it
I believe it's called a "slow roll", meaning that a player trying to "fake" having a weak hand with his gesture and facial expressions or something along those line to "trap" the other play into think he has a weak one so they may bet higher or something. It's consider not very sportmanship because it's basically making the other person feel bad for thinking he's (the slow roller) having something terrible.
In other words, when you have the best possible hand like the guy at the flop had, and he waits and thinks
It’s disgraceful because the other guy is already all in since he’s bet is twice the total amount of Andreas chips.
Here any one with 2 money brain cells could instantly call because the entire point of slow playing is to get other person to do a “all in” but Andreas already got that on flop and STILL acted like he could still milk more. When obviously after an all in, there is no more milking.
Essentially Imigine if someone flops a royal flush and the opponent goes all in. If the person with royal flush took 1 full minute to call his all in- people would get mad because wtf is he thinking? Obviously he is not gonna fold a royal flush and he will have to show his cards and there is no probable card that can beat it.
It’s just bad sportsmanship.
His opponent bet enough chips on the flop to put him all-in, so there was no option for him to check behind, raise or re-raise the pot. His only options were to call or fold. Since his hand was a flush from the flop, he had the best possible hand and therefore had no decision to make except to call. I mean, why would you ever fold the best hand on the flop?
But instead of snap-calling, he decided to pout around, and scratch his head, and act weak. All the grandstanding and Hollywooding is called slow-rolling. It is completely unnecessary, because he doesn't have to try and induce a raise or call from his opponent because all the possible chips that could be in the pot already are. It's pointless and wastes all the other player's time and given how long it takes to play multiple rounds of poker it is considered extremely disrespectful, rude and bad sportsmanship.
Can someone explain why andreas was being called disrespectful? I'm confused
on the first clip
He had the best possible hand on that flop and only had four big blinds left so there was no decision to be made when he was pushed all in apart from "call".
It's disrespectful to slow roll what is the best possible hand given the current board.
@@conornolan5032 Of course there's a decision, he could have folded.
@@TheMarlinspike There should only be one outcome. Therefore, in theory, there is no decision to be made.
@@TheMarlinspike He could have folded? Hahahaha, he had the best possible hand in that scenario, no player in the world is folding a nut flush when the flop contains the ace of diamonds and you hold the next two best cards in the King and Queen of diamonds. GTFO you mug or better still sell your house and come play me heads up for €250,000 if you think there's a decision to fold. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Whoever has the worse hand always ends up winning. Unless it’s me. Then I just have the worse hand.
I always found it funny how they overreacted to his length of play in the first clip. The video shows exactly why there was time needed to debate a call like that for some players. A flush doesn't beat a full house and getting put all in when you're holding the nut flush after the flop tells you that you're about to play against pairing the board which means you've got a 1:5 chance of being eliminated or your opponent is nuts.
I know I personally have tossed pocket aces post flop in a lot of cases where I'm favored because my luck with them has been horrible over 20 years. It's been one of my worst starting hands against people chasing a draw. So I don't fault someone wrestling with the decision of calling all in after the flop against what is obviously a set or 2 pair and has about a 20% chance of getting a boat by the river. If it was me it wouldn't be Hollywooding it would be a legitimate debate going on in my head on if I like the odds with how the play has been treating me throughout the day.
At the very very worst, having an 80% chance to win and taking a minute to go all in is ridiculous. With that few chips he won’t make it to another point where he has chances that high. Not instantly calling with a nut flush while already committing a huge chunk of your stack is stupid
Sorry but this makes no sense. Do you always debate if it if not you’re gonna call a bet when you hold the nut flush? Like really? How is this something you don’t already have an auto response with?
I really don’t understand it. You have 80% chances to win. It would be like debating folding pocket aces pre flop. If you don’t like 80% chnace of winning, I really don’t understand how you could play poker at all.
irish commentary is fucking incredible
What did they mean by Phil Hellmuth 2010 at 1:37?
Is there are player that can change card play poker or magician play poker
What happen why they reacting for?
idk either
Highest straight toilet flush
This video shows exactly how I loss most of my good hands in online poker
Phils abit of a sooky baba tho lol