What's the difference between 3rd Gen and this 4th Gen besides the big price difference? I got the 3rd for my son because of the great reviews and price compare to newer models.
The 4th Gen is the update to the 3rd gen. This is the continual evolution of rackets (and all products really) where the older model goes on sale. There is typically a cosmetic difference and a slight technology difference, but both are not significant. Both the cosmetic and technology upgrades are discussed in the video 😁
Thank you so much for the kind words :)) I would suspect that the soft RA and other components make it nice, but if you are an adult with an average physicality, then the TEAM option is too light for you and possible stress on the arm. If average height/build you would benefit more the 100 model where the standard weight can take stress off the body.
Thanks@@SolowSports I was thinking in a low weight racket due to my shoulder laxity. Not sure how much weight i could hold up without hurting my shoulder or wrist.
@@gaussnet Totally get it. Wilson Clash = the most comfort oriented racket for injury prevention. It does not have control like this racket, but if injury prevention is at the top of your list, you absolutely need to start there :)
Would this racquet be a good option for a 4.0 senior singles player, or go with the 100, or 16x 19 ps? Do you get good pop on the serve with this team?
Great question. It is a midweight option. I guide players to cover the first 2 things when selecting a racket. 1. Weight class (260, 280, 300, or 315+g) and 2. Performance category (power, control, spin, etc). This racket is class #2 and control. If that matches your expectations, then next would be delve further into this lines of rackets. Let us know if the first 2 are a match or if you differ.
What's the difference between 3rd Gen and this 4th Gen besides the big price difference? I got the 3rd for my son because of the great reviews and price compare to newer models.
The 4th Gen is the update to the 3rd gen. This is the continual evolution of rackets (and all products really) where the older model goes on sale. There is typically a cosmetic difference and a slight technology difference, but both are not significant. Both the cosmetic and technology upgrades are discussed in the video 😁
Great review!! Do you think this racket could be a arm friendly option for a 40 years old adult recreational player?
Thank you so much for the kind words :)) I would suspect that the soft RA and other components make it nice, but if you are an adult with an average physicality, then the TEAM option is too light for you and possible stress on the arm. If average height/build you would benefit more the 100 model where the standard weight can take stress off the body.
Thanks@@SolowSports I was thinking in a low weight racket due to my shoulder laxity. Not sure how much weight i could hold up without hurting my shoulder or wrist.
@@gaussnet Totally get it. Wilson Clash = the most comfort oriented racket for injury prevention. It does not have control like this racket, but if injury prevention is at the top of your list, you absolutely need to start there :)
Would this racquet be a good option for a 4.0 senior singles player, or go with the 100, or 16x 19 ps? Do you get good pop on the serve with this team?
Great question. It is a midweight option. I guide players to cover the first 2 things when selecting a racket. 1. Weight class (260, 280, 300, or 315+g) and 2. Performance category (power, control, spin, etc). This racket is class #2 and control. If that matches your expectations, then next would be delve further into this lines of rackets. Let us know if the first 2 are a match or if you differ.
I currently use the 2024 100 16x19 strike, I think it'll be a good option for you
@@melchaig.n.5238 Great suggestion :)
Balance point is 325 mm, not 330...unstrung!
We are just using the manufacturer specs. It’s possible you’re seeing strung and unstrung specs.
@@SolowSports It s write on the frame, 325 mm balance unstrung
@@cosminpantelimon1664 Thanks for catching that. Might be a typo from Babolat as that is where we got the spec graphic directly from.