Glad you mentioned Goddard. I've watched many videos about the history of rocket development that just skip right to the V-2 and just forget about the Father of Modern Rocketry. Also great video overall. I do like the history dating all the way back to fireworks and philosophers.
Both true and untrue. A major driver for innovation is competition, therefore cooperation does not mean faster or better solutions. It rather means that you'll get a solution.
This cant be because First, whoever lands First literally owns it. Second, you can't land on Mars because Mars doesn't support life, third, even if you manage to reach your destination somehow, there won't be enough fuel for the return trip.
Tipu Sultan's rockets were designed to explode on impact, and they were much more accurate and had a longer range than the rockets used by the British. They caused panic and chaos among the British troops, who had never seen such weapons before
It is the nature of humankind to push itself toward the horizon. We test our limits. We face our fears. We rise to the challenge and become something greater than ourselves
It takes competition or war to fund progress in rocketry. I'm grateful there's less of the latter although who knows what happens in secret, and SpaceX advances means other companies need to innovate or they'll fail.
The thumbnail of this video is misleading. It shows picture of rockets 1891 / 1943 / 1969 / NOW. 1891 shows the Goddard's first ever Liquid Fueled Rocket. However it is launched on 1926. Is the thumbnail picture of this Video is Wrong?
This is the best way of learning about science history 🥳🥳🥳 I was missing only one thing, and that is that probably by the end of this year the first 3D printed rocket will go up in space 🚀🪐
Well I have noticed in the title that the Goddard rocket year is 1891 which is wrong and also I have noticed that there is a lot of views but not that many comments which seems like maybe a little bit of view botting
if we'd push aside the ridiclous and stupid fighting and wars. we humanity as a whole could get a lot done. not just in the stars but also help our home too
Millstone that is hung around the neck signifies that man has the power to conquer the universe the method used is somewhat dire insight into the future can however be the answer to all man unanswered question
but the germans perfected and made a far advanced version that worked in real time war. many german scientists helped in the moon landing projects. many lesser lights worked with soviet scientists
People witnessed alien spaceships instantly changing trajectories with lightning speeds, being super quiet and miles in size. We are stage 0 civilization unfortunately. And we cannot unlock all nature’s secrets.
Master "Wan Hu" Magnificent 🇨🇳 Chinese rocket chair 4.000 years Old. Nothing to do With Westerners Twisting as usual. Where is the picture of Sputnik 🇷🇺🛰️🇷🇺🛰️🇷🇺⁉️
I don't get this. Rockets are also bad for the climate. They release a lot of carbon dioxide. So we should pause the rocket industry, until we have electrical rockets. That releases 0% carbon dioxide. (If electrical batterys, is the future. Beacuse batterys is bad for the climate, too. In their way.) Just my thoughts on rockets.
The number of batteries needed would be too heavy to lift a rocket through the atmosphere. More importantly, a new thrust system would have to be used, like a turbine. We could use electrostatic or ion thrusters, but those only work well in the vacuum of space (where solar power is also plentiful).
CH4 rockets (starship) can be made pretty easily in a carbon neutral way...extract co2 and h2o from the atmosphere and convert to ch4 and o2. also commercial planes generate millions of times the pollution that the rocket industry. Electric rockets are never going to be a thing...in the far future we may have fusion powered electric plasma engines in space, but nothing beats the chemical engine for actually getting to orbit.
![Evolution of SpaceX Rockets (NEW) [2002-2023]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_L5dXIFKWqM/mqdefault.jpg)
Glad you mentioned Goddard. I've watched many videos about the history of rocket development that just skip right to the V-2 and just forget about the Father of Modern Rocketry. Also great video overall. I do like the history dating all the way back to fireworks and philosophers.
If intellectuals from every country had come together a century back for a space exploration cause, we would have been on Mars today!!
Both true and untrue. A major driver for innovation is competition, therefore cooperation does not mean faster or better solutions. It rather means that you'll get a solution.
@@Overvaag war was needed
Those same intellectuals came together to invent weapons of mass destruction.
This cant be because First, whoever lands First literally owns it. Second, you can't land on Mars because Mars doesn't support life, third, even if you manage to reach your destination somehow, there won't be enough fuel for the return trip.
@@Mtl-zf9om America doesn't own the moon. Why cant we land if there is no life? Just give yourself enough fuel to get home
I learnt a lot of stuff in this video. The content is wonderful, thank you!
7:05 I thought whips were the very first man-made object to break the sound barrier? HAHAHHAHHAHAH
Tipu Sultan's rockets were designed to explode on impact, and they were much more accurate and had a longer range than the rockets used by the British. They caused panic and chaos among the British troops, who had never seen such weapons before
It is the nature of humankind to push itself toward the horizon.
We test our limits.
We face our fears.
We rise to the challenge and become something greater than ourselves
This content is amazing!
Sad to see the peak of rocket technology was 50 years ago. There has been very little progress since then.
Because USA no longer felt competition from any other superpower…for better or worse with China rising again there will again be increased spending.
Now that SpaceX is on the scene, competition is now having to lower cost and innovate or they will die.
It takes competition or war to fund progress in rocketry. I'm grateful there's less of the latter although who knows what happens in secret, and SpaceX advances means other companies need to innovate or they'll fail.
The thumbnail of this video is misleading. It shows picture of rockets 1891 / 1943 / 1969 / NOW. 1891 shows the Goddard's first ever Liquid Fueled Rocket. However it is launched on 1926. Is the thumbnail picture of this Video is Wrong?
There are are a lot of weird inconsistencies between the script and the visuals. Like when they show the Space Shuttle when talking about the 1960s
@@timothybrown2443 there were space shuttle designs as early as the 1960s so its not really misleading
The quality content that I'm looking for, new subscriber here
Yeah great
This is the best way of learning about science history 🥳🥳🥳
I was missing only one thing, and that is that probably by the end of this year the first 3D printed rocket will go up in space 🚀🪐
I like how the rockets now look more and more if you asked a 1st Grader to draw a Rocket
Mysore our birth place proud to be a mysorian
Fabulous Video 🔥
Much love from iraq 🇮🇶❤
@Zane PLAYS THIS 🙀
@@macrospeed4804 Jij 🙀
The first one looks like an firework
This video just says to me I have alot to learn...
Whenever big technology existed you will find Germany is the initiator Nuclear power and rocket are some examples
Nice video.
subscribe instantly. good content
The word "roquette" it's not italian but french instead
7:13 7:14 7:15 7:16 7:16 7:18 7:19 7:20 7:21 7:22 7:22 7:22 7:23
This video is really inspiring me to be a better person! thank you for this educational experience!
Well I have noticed in the title that the Goddard rocket year is 1891 which is wrong and also I have noticed that there is a lot of views but not that many comments which seems like maybe a little bit of view botting
Nice
can you do a behind the scenes of vision video
Good Bro
music for the last segment?
It's getting smaller...
How did we end up with rockets that look like 1920’s Buck Rogers props?
if we'd push aside the ridiclous and stupid fighting and wars. we humanity as a whole could get a lot done. not just in the stars but also help our home too
So basically, nothing has changed since 1943.
Because the Germans lost the war, that's why. They have the most honest language, philosophy and scientists.
Yet we're out maneuvered by an oversized tic tac
Underrated comment
bruh first part of the thumbnail hurts my brain
Impressive.
400 million years ago life left the ocean
now life dared to leave earth
The first liquid fuel rocket was not made in 1891..
The other text are so fast, I can't barely read it!
Anyone else who needs this for art lesson?
Evolution or revolution?
Didn't Ruski invented the rocket. They first made the Big rocket and launched to space. Usa had no idea what was that about
You missing the father of space age jack parsons the one eye worshiper
Can you do a video about isro's achievements
@GareebScientist
I think in 2024 we will launch amother space to mars
Tech
India 🇮🇳
New New .
In the future, rockets will be AI
"Elongated metal chamber"
Elon musk?
the molemen will shock the world when the first rockets are launched from their underground civilizations
1861 Gods glory in heavens
1903 rocket equation Konstantin
robert goddart 1926
40. 200. 1000. 5000.
25000. 125000.
ike
PTVSW
Millstone that is hung around the neck signifies that man has the power to conquer the universe the method used is somewhat dire insight into the future can however be the answer to all man unanswered question
I believe the Chinese invented solid rocket engines first. And then Goddard invented the FIRST EVER liquid fuel rocket.
but the germans perfected and made a far advanced version that worked in real time war. many german scientists helped in the moon landing projects. many lesser lights worked with soviet scientists
Ehvolution not eevolution
3:02
rock
Who else is here from SFS
NOW
Tipu sultan the great Muslim warrior of Mysore (India) was first to use rockets as a weapon.
First thing that comes to mind, SpaceX looks like Nazi-Wonder-weapons. Surely not by coincidence.
"Thanks Obama" lol
🌻🌺♥️🌺🌻
CKC
Even Elons wife looks like from space
11:44
12 dislike
Nicw
People witnessed alien spaceships instantly changing trajectories with lightning speeds, being super quiet and miles in size. We are stage 0 civilization unfortunately. And we cannot unlock all nature’s secrets.
0.75*
not yet ;)
Sergei Korolev not russian! He is Ukrainian!
So he is a soviet.
Sh
Master "Wan Hu"
Magnificent 🇨🇳
Chinese rocket chair 4.000 years
Old.
Nothing to do
With Westerners
Twisting as usual.
Where is the picture of Sputnik
🇷🇺🛰️🇷🇺🛰️🇷🇺⁉️
First
Soviets made better.
Rockets don’t work in space, it’s all fake. THIS WHOLE VIDEO IS CGI FROM START TO FINISH 😂😂
Bro it’s not fake everybody know how cgi looks so shut up
I don't get this.
Rockets are also bad for the climate. They release a lot of carbon dioxide.
So we should pause the rocket industry, until we have electrical rockets. That releases 0% carbon dioxide.
(If electrical batterys, is the future.
Beacuse batterys is bad for the climate, too. In their way.)
Just my thoughts on rockets.
The number of batteries needed would be too heavy to lift a rocket through the atmosphere. More importantly, a new thrust system would have to be used, like a turbine. We could use electrostatic or ion thrusters, but those only work well in the vacuum of space (where solar power is also plentiful).
CH4 rockets (starship) can be made pretty easily in a carbon neutral way...extract co2 and h2o from the atmosphere and convert to ch4 and o2. also commercial planes generate millions of times the pollution that the rocket industry.
Electric rockets are never going to be a thing...in the far future we may have fusion powered electric plasma engines in space, but nothing beats the chemical engine for actually getting to orbit.
Water shipping is worse
@@Michael-ij6kg wut u mean?
NOW