For me, this has one of the best flight models in MSFS so far. It feels stable and believable, the trim feels good and its not as nervous around the pitch as most other aircrafts. I‘m also found the workload manageable. Most can be done before taxi or after landing - its a question of organization - and then the critical phases are not much more demanding than in a 737-800 or so.
Even the fuel-dump panel can be opened and controlled. This aircraft ist god-tier simulation level! I love this airplane. And it looks gorgeous at night, so beautyful. For night flights there is also a dimmable red dome light available too like in all more classic eighties retro planes.
I wondered about that as well. Maybe it’s too detailed/ complicated for most people? Don’t forget that the hard core simmers only take up a small portion of the flightsim community
I have a feeling that it has to do with Emi and his controversial comments previously about Fenix , other developers ATC vatsim etc. his reputation is not the best but videos are great.
Especially with aircraft like this, they are just too complex for many. I could have decided to fly the plane with a GPS and using the automated Flight Engineer (like the vast amount of customers will do) and the vids would have been more attractive for most people. The majority of flight simmers just won’t bother to learn INS and conventional navigation, let alone the FE‘s job. But I deliberately choose not to. RUclips isn’t a business for me, I don’t care about clickbaiting, maximizing profits or tailoring my stuff to what the broad audience wants to see. I simply show how I’m using my aircraft, I show and say what I think of addons, and I also show their shortcomings, which is often controversial. The E Jets were a classical example of that. Or the bugs in the Fenix, like the flare or flap 3 issues. But I really don’t care, I’m not a fan of hyping stuff. Of course that all means I leave potential to get more views unused. But that’s fine, I earn my money flying aircraft, not making RUclips videos.
@@A330Driver I got through your first two tutorials, and then MSFS started misbehaving, so I'm going to take a break then get those sweet engines running! :) By then you'll probably have the climb out and cruise vids ready - thanks again!
Excellent video. I have a question Why after I turn on the APU, in the top panel of the engineer, I don't have the three engine generator circuit lights on? they are off. Thank you
Curious, the Mode selector on the Altitude Select Panel isn't working with hundreds on the down position. I wonder if I messed up something or the version of the aircraft you have is newer. I have 1.0.0 and Aerosoft One tells me there aren't any updates. Also, the Radio frequency selector, when moved to the right frequency, the blue light above it does not illuminate. I have to test in vPilot if the frequencies actually change despite of the light not switiching. Anybody else having these issues?
Hey Emanuel, for one of your next videos, can you please explain which SIDS /STARS you need to choose when using older NAV equipment like the C IV-A. (My focus: flying on online networks... ) Thanks in advance !
Technically speaking you can only choose those starts where conventional navigation is possible all along. As soon as RNAV is required you can not do them anymore and need to ask for a radar vectored departure instead.
Wow….it seems you know how everything works but you are far to young to have been flying this aircraft in reallife. Where did you get the knowledge from? Thanks for it, just purchased this fascinating aircraft and look forward to the rest of your tutorials….thanks again!
A lot of the stuff is basic ATPL knowledge and basic system understanding. When you have that and then get access to an FCOM, many things become simple and easy to understand. Also don't forget I'm flight simming since many many years, which has put me in touch with all kinds of different planes and systems over the years, which again makes it simpler as well.
Is this FSS 727, and indication and acceptance that FSS better stick to developing this type of retro stick and rudder aircrafts in MSFS, versus the most modern aircrafts like the ever-early release of the FSS E-175?
I wouldn't say so, but it surely is an indication that it is a better idea to develop aircraft to a much more advanced state before eventually releasing them to the public. I think what really bit FSS into the back with the Embraers was the decision to release them so early rather than to keep them in development and bring them to a more advanced state before bringing them out to the public.
@@A330Driver I hope that’s the case, because it has taken them forever to continue it implementation of the FMC and VNAV. I have the impression that they are their Achilles heel, and have no clue on how to go about them. There has been no development in a few months.
@@lvwpyFSS has been good at delivering high quality aircraft graphics and flight models. Where they’ve struggled is in developing the math and physics of the FMC and VNAV recreation. That’s been my concern with them finishing the E-Jet.
Sorry to ask this but how come the 727 doesn't need any fuel system/pump/valves open to start the APU? I thought it came from tank 2 but not sure...BTW... Great tutorial.
Hey, I have a question regarding to the PMDG 777 in MSFS but no one else Could help me so i hoped that maybe you could be my Savior. So the Problem is that when i land (i fly with thrustmaster stick) is that my reverser dosnt work until i disengage the Autothrust. but i saw in your videos that you dont have to do that. Do you Know what kind of setting this is? do you maybe know the Problem?
Different pressures all around the airplane change the temperature of the air around those parts of the plane. Just because you have 10°C at the location of the TAT probe, you do not have 10°C all around the airplane.
Depends on your personal definition of study level, since everyone has a different opinion. The CIV-A INS appears fully simulated along with drift and DME POS updates, the entire flight engineer station is simulated (fuel system, hydraulics, pressurization/bleeds/pack temps/cooling doors/etc.), electrical (including manual synchronization of generator phases before closing circuits). I do not believe engine failures/maintenance/CBs are simulated. However, messing up the packs/pack temps will cause the appropriate system trips to engage, and things like that.
Hello Emi, nice content thanks for your videos. I saw the processor you are using for simming and wonder if you have already updated the microcode for the issues that arose with Intel 13th and 14th generation… I have an i7 13700F and I am a bit afraid of using MSFS lately and I am waiting for the BIOS update… What are you thouts on this Intel issue?
Hi, I had to update my BIOS twice to keep the system running by now. Whenever I start to see instability, the first thing I do is a BIOS update and it usually works quite well.
For me, this has one of the best flight models in MSFS so far. It feels stable and believable, the trim feels good and its not as nervous around the pitch as most other aircrafts.
I‘m also found the workload manageable. Most can be done before taxi or after landing - its a question of organization - and then the critical phases are not much more demanding than in a 737-800 or so.
Its handling feels very comfortable, and I really enjoy using it for visual landing.
Thanks for all the work putting together the detailed tutorials
Man I can not wait to master this plane. So fun.
Even the fuel-dump panel can be opened and controlled. This aircraft ist god-tier simulation level! I love this airplane. And it looks gorgeous at night, so beautyful. For night flights there is also a dimmable red dome light available too like in all more classic eighties retro planes.
Your videos are superior to most other flight sim channels, yet you have fewer views. I wonder why.
I wondered about that as well. Maybe it’s too detailed/ complicated for most people? Don’t forget that the hard core simmers only take up a small portion of the flightsim community
@@philippehendrickx1109 Well, flightdeck2sim is equally detailed and he has many more views. It's puzzling.
I have a feeling that it has to do with Emi and his controversial comments previously about Fenix , other developers ATC vatsim etc. his reputation is not the best but videos are great.
Especially with aircraft like this, they are just too complex for many. I could have decided to fly the plane with a GPS and using the automated Flight Engineer (like the vast amount of customers will do) and the vids would have been more attractive for most people. The majority of flight simmers just won’t bother to learn INS and conventional navigation, let alone the FE‘s job.
But I deliberately choose not to. RUclips isn’t a business for me, I don’t care about clickbaiting, maximizing profits or tailoring my stuff to what the broad audience wants to see. I simply show how I’m using my aircraft, I show and say what I think of addons, and I also show their shortcomings, which is often controversial. The E Jets were a classical example of that. Or the bugs in the Fenix, like the flare or flap 3 issues. But I really don’t care, I’m not a fan of hyping stuff. Of course that all means I leave potential to get more views unused. But that’s fine, I earn my money flying aircraft, not making RUclips videos.
@@A330Driver Thank you very much for all the effort and care you put into your exceptional videos.
Thanks so much for this Emmanuel, great tutorial as always!
Awesome! I'm looking forward to next parts!
Thanks for this! Easy to follow retain. I've been looking so forward to this plane making it into the sim that I really want to do this one right! :)
I’m sure you’ll love it! I really came to enjoy it once I found my head around the procedures.
@@A330Driver I got through your first two tutorials, and then MSFS started misbehaving, so I'm going to take a break then get those sweet engines running! :) By then you'll probably have the climb out and cruise vids ready - thanks again!
Love it Emi, thank you sir!
Great ! Thank you Emanuel . 👍
Even me when I grow up i want to be a pilot I will come to your cantry and teach me
Excellent video. I have a question
Why after I turn on the APU, in the top panel of the engineer, I don't have the three engine generator circuit lights on? they are off. Thank you
Thank you for your tutorial. Without a doubt, using AI engineers has simplified many steps, which is not my style.
Curious, the Mode selector on the Altitude Select Panel isn't working with hundreds on the down position. I wonder if I messed up something or the version of the aircraft you have is newer. I have 1.0.0 and Aerosoft One tells me there aren't any updates. Also, the Radio frequency selector, when moved to the right frequency, the blue light above it does not illuminate. I have to test in vPilot if the frequencies actually change despite of the light not switiching. Anybody else having these issues?
Hey Emanuel, for one of your next videos, can you please explain which SIDS /STARS you need to choose when using older NAV equipment like the C IV-A.
(My focus: flying on online networks... )
Thanks in advance !
Technically speaking you can only choose those starts where conventional navigation is possible all along. As soon as RNAV is required you can not do them anymore and need to ask for a radar vectored departure instead.
what you think about new series from krukki-a330?will we see it sooner or later?I have many doubts....
Hi
Wow….it seems you know how everything works but you are far to young to have been flying this aircraft in reallife. Where did you get the knowledge from? Thanks for it, just purchased this fascinating aircraft and look forward to the rest of your tutorials….thanks again!
A lot of the stuff is basic ATPL knowledge and basic system understanding. When you have that and then get access to an FCOM, many things become simple and easy to understand. Also don't forget I'm flight simming since many many years, which has put me in touch with all kinds of different planes and systems over the years, which again makes it simpler as well.
@@A330Driver but it still is a lot of work, we all thank you for that!😊👏
Is this FSS 727, and indication and acceptance that FSS better stick to developing this type of retro stick and rudder aircrafts in MSFS, versus the most modern aircrafts like the ever-early release of the FSS E-175?
I wouldn't say so, but it surely is an indication that it is a better idea to develop aircraft to a much more advanced state before eventually releasing them to the public. I think what really bit FSS into the back with the Embraers was the decision to release them so early rather than to keep them in development and bring them to a more advanced state before bringing them out to the public.
@@A330Driver I hope that’s the case, because it has taken them forever to continue it implementation of the FMC and VNAV. I have the impression that they are their Achilles heel, and have no clue on how to go about them. There has been no development in a few months.
On the contrary, for me their 727 is some kind of guarantee that when the E-Jets are finally finished, they're going to be at least this good.
@@lvwpyFSS has been good at delivering high quality aircraft graphics and flight models. Where they’ve struggled is in developing the math and physics of the FMC and VNAV recreation. That’s been my concern with them finishing the E-Jet.
Sorry to ask this but how come the 727 doesn't need any fuel system/pump/valves open to start the APU? I thought it came from tank 2 but not sure...BTW... Great tutorial.
Since it's located in the wheel well, the APU is gravity fed. Pretty neat!
Hey, I have a question regarding to the PMDG 777 in MSFS but no one else Could help me so i hoped that maybe you could be my Savior. So the Problem is that when i land (i fly with thrustmaster stick) is that my reverser dosnt work until i disengage the Autothrust. but i saw in your videos that you dont have to do that. Do you Know what kind of setting this is? do you maybe know the Problem?
Hi, please open a support ticket directly with PMDG. Support.pmdg.com. Over there you can get help.
Hello, I have watched your flights in the pmdg 737. Why do we turn the anti-ice at or below 10°C TAT instead of 0°C ?
Different pressures all around the airplane change the temperature of the air around those parts of the plane. Just because you have 10°C at the location of the TAT probe, you do not have 10°C all around the airplane.
Is this aircraft study level?
Depends on your personal definition of study level, since everyone has a different opinion. The CIV-A INS appears fully simulated along with drift and DME POS updates, the entire flight engineer station is simulated (fuel system, hydraulics, pressurization/bleeds/pack temps/cooling doors/etc.), electrical (including manual synchronization of generator phases before closing circuits).
I do not believe engine failures/maintenance/CBs are simulated. However, messing up the packs/pack temps will cause the appropriate system trips to engage, and things like that.
If they do the required bug fixes, add weather radar, and program a random failure mode, it will be study level.
@@purrple.shadows I need to add a new FMC, which has existed in the real world before.
No, it's not study level.
@@A330Driver What would it take to make it study level?
I want to see the INS with auto pilot
Climb tutorial ;-)
Hello Emi, nice content thanks for your videos. I saw the processor you are using for simming and wonder if you have already updated the microcode for the issues that arose with Intel 13th and 14th generation… I have an i7 13700F and I am a bit afraid of using MSFS lately and I am waiting for the BIOS update… What are you thouts on this Intel issue?
Hi, I had to update my BIOS twice to keep the system running by now. Whenever I start to see instability, the first thing I do is a BIOS update and it usually works quite well.
@@A330DriverThanks for your answer Emi