Venezianico Stunning Nereide Ceramica Unboxing

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июл 2022
  • Have to say I'm pretty impressed with this one I feel Venezianico are really
    doing well with the new models
    Here is a link to there website www.venezianico.com/products/...

Комментарии • 28

  • @mediastarguest
    @mediastarguest Год назад +1

    Stunning. The finishing of every aspect of the watch is very impressive. Enjoy your watch.

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  Год назад

      It is but I did find myself having to replace the reversing wheels of the movement which is a bit of a shame

    • @mediastarguest
      @mediastarguest Год назад +1

      @@ClickSpringReview Yeah I know, I read it in the comments. There's almost always something: a little while ago I spent 75€ fixing a problem on a R.Weil quartz, which I thought was a bit absurd. These watch companies want us to pay top dollar for their products - every watch should come with a five year guarantee for the prices they charge.
      Some people are even prepared to put up with the absurd misalignment issues on their Seikos and keep going back to buy more !

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  Год назад

      @@mediastarguest Its not to bad for me as I'm a studying watchmaker so I just ordered the parts and did it myself for minimum cost, It would of been more a pain to send it back. A part from that I do really like the watch, the fit and finish is excellent

  • @pericadurdevic8246
    @pericadurdevic8246 Год назад +1

    Looks amazing. Name is just as it should.

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  Год назад +1

      You should check out my full review of it Perica ruclips.net/video/M6dQxfpaUBI/видео.html

  • @mytuberforyou
    @mytuberforyou Год назад +2

    On my Nereide, the case edges are very sharp, and serrated since the side case "brushing" looks like it was done with a bench grinder or dragged down a driveway. It's been sitting in my watch case waiting for a repolish- which really should not be necessary on a brand new watch.

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  Год назад

      Thats not acceptable Sir have you contacted them about it

    • @mytuberforyou
      @mytuberforyou Год назад +1

      @@ClickSpringReview I and many others complained on their furum and others, , they cite it as the "style", I didn't think poor QC was a style. They have since disconinued the limited edition I paid a premium for and changed the name of the company. They didn't offer to recase it, it's simply easier for them to take an example that is finishged to a higher standard and send it to somebody like you to write a glowing review and dupe more people into buying their low-quality watches I guess. I seriously have a couple of $60 Alibaba specials with better finishing, it's the last time I buy from Mecchanique Veneziane / Vincero, I mean Venezianico. Even the logo on the clasp which is clearly etched in the press pics and even the booklet they send with the watch turns out to just be burned on the surface with a fiber laser. Just cheap. $700 for a watch that fairly should be around $300-350.

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  Год назад

      The finishing of the watch I had no problems with at all .
      I did have a problem with the movement last week , its the SW200-1 and the reversing wheels had packed up , you could tell this by when you hand wind the watch the rotor spins at the same time , I didn't report it but just replace the wheels myself as they only cost £12 and is a simple fix ,

  • @Mile-long-list
    @Mile-long-list 2 года назад +3

    That looks fantastic. I think a brushed bracelet would be better just to offset the case a bit but I think that's just subjective. Great video thanks !

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  2 года назад

      Cheers Mark I must say I’m really enjoying the watch it feels and looks a lot more expensive than what it is

  • @artieshell9205
    @artieshell9205 2 года назад +3

    Great video !! It’s gorgeous! As others have said, the name is a stumbling block in the mouth and eyes. Did you mention price? If you did, I missed it. Thanks for the video!

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  2 года назад

      Thanks 👍🏻 was only a quick unboxing but the watch is very impressive as for the price it’s 865 euros which is about the same in USD I believe , but your right about the name 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @vegard2000
    @vegard2000 2 года назад +2

    These watches look more expensive than they are, but talk about shooting themselves in the leg with the company name and branding. It doesn't roll off the international tongue and it can't be easily spelled out to google.

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  2 года назад

      You maybe right there I had to look up the name so to try and pronounce it correctly 😁 . But all joking aside the watch is gorgeous and could easily be 5x the price Vegard

    • @quarters-eye8922
      @quarters-eye8922 2 года назад +1

      Name of the company is terrible.
      Too complicated - Too long.
      Pick a better brand name and work on marketing and they will have a winner on their hands.
      One more thing :
      A butterfly clasp doesn’t belong on a Diver. I realize most of these watches are Desk Divers, but it’s still out of place.

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  2 года назад

      @@quarters-eye8922 Unfortunately you are right about the name it was longer before but they shortened it ,
      The watch it self I think is great and just looks so expensive

  • @drdesign6886
    @drdesign6886 2 года назад +1

    Totally copied from the CW C60 trident pro. Photocopier job.

    • @1millionstartups
      @1millionstartups 2 года назад

      Good eyes, only diff I could tell is bracelet and caseback.

    • @drdesign6886
      @drdesign6886 2 года назад

      @@1millionstartups yeah bracelet is obviously different - and the case sucks compared to the CW light catcher. But the dial and overall look is a straight up rip off.

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  2 года назад +1

      I used to have the CW C60 Trident was a good watch I've even reviewed it but one could say its a copy of the Submarine the cost copied watch in the world .
      The CW comes in at £960 were as the £730 both carry the SW200-1 movement ,
      The CW even went as far as to have an oyster style bracelet just like the Sub .
      Both are similar to the submarine but is that a bad thing a classic timeless design ?

    • @drdesign6886
      @drdesign6886 2 года назад

      @@ClickSpringReview If you see a sub when looking at a C60 and think CW entirely ripped the design off Rolex then there is little point in discussing anything. So I’ll save my breath.

    • @ClickSpringReview
      @ClickSpringReview  2 года назад

      @@drdesign6886 I’ve just had two people at say the watch looks just like a submarine and one has a date just