It Was All A HUGE Lie...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 мар 2024
- This happens way too often...
Crop your merch here - totalrunningproductions.com/
Support the channel - / totalrunningproductions
Instagram - / total_running_productions
========================================
*Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS 
Спорт
the fact that 10.9 would not even be winning a competitive high school championship…
I was thinking the same 😂
“In a race with really fast kids he wouldn’t win.”
10.9 wins most HS meets across the country until regionals.
10.9 doesnt even qualify him for new balance nationals in the 100 lmao
On a field with cleats?
i was about to say. in my state, division 3 track is as small as it gets in highschool, and nearly 25 years ago when i was in track and we went to states for division 3, the person from the school that ended up winning, woulda have smoked him with a 10.6
The equivalent of me saying I can run a 5:42 mile which is only 2 minutes off the world record
No its not at all
@@28mouse85yeah more like a 4:14 mile. Very fast yet still nothing when compared to the world record. About what top-of-the-state high school runners do in the U.S and that might even be a stretch to say with how many low and sub 4:00 high school milers there have been recently.
@@unknowncreative9074i’d say closer to 4:25, decent but not quite enough to qualify you for nationals or anything
@@ayeeffvee8173 qualifying standard for Nike nationals is 10.84 for 100 and 4:15 for mile/4:13.80 for 1600. Also just going based on the math 9.58/10.9=~0.88 and 223.13/254=~0.88.
@@ayeeffvee817310.9 wouldn’t even qualify you for high school nationals and definitely wouldn’t win state
as a british dude, i apologise on behalf of the bbc
I love BBC’s 🤤
Pause
I dont 😏
But you got vaxxed?
@@braydenkenworthy2367resume😩
10.9 is like the fastest high schooler at your local league meet 😂😂😂
Facts 😂
That'd be 9.99 where I am from...
Ong u not even making it to state with that
Yup. Friend of mine ran 10.9 as a 13 year old 😂 (windy)
@@patmanrickand Mbappé's time is also estimated, meanwhile he ran a fly-100m. I've ran once fly-100m in 10.97 with hand-timed, and my electronic PB is 11.85 HAHAHAHA
The post somehow managed to disrespect BOTH Mbappe and Bolt
Mbappe was running while kicking a ball🤷🤷🤷
@@llelo_kas if it mattered... bolt would still beat him while jogging... literally...
@@llelo_k Prime Bolt can jog 9.85 into a headwind 💀
@@datname1939 And never score a goal in high level soccer. Apples and oranges. Silly video.
@@CC-xu2yzthis video is about sprinting not football
10.9 is faster than probably 99% of the population, but this is like saying that a sub 5 mile is close to the mile world record.
Closer to a 4½ minute mile is on par with a 3:43, but yeah.
Way more than 99%.
Still, just an estimation, and i dare to say he would be much faster than that on an actual 100m sprint. Most opf the time, players have been running up and down for 20 to 30 minutes before they get these opportunities of dashing fast on the court for a big portion of it.
Buddy sub 11 is like 0.0002% of the planet at any given time lmao.
@@alanjohnson6169 the guy know it's not 99%. The point is even if it's 0.0002% it's still not even close to be comparable.
Sub 11s is like sub 5 mile indeed, it's crazy for ordinary people only.
I don't know the real number of person who run sub 11, but i remember in university random sprinters could run sub 11 and it would be something to brag only if you were NOT a sprinter, and i'm from France i'm not talking about a competitive uni in the US where sprinting is much more cultural.
by curiosity i just checked what was the time to beat for a 20/20 mark at sprinting in the Uni i was: it's 10.6s and we are there to learn sports sciences not to be competitive at one sport (In France school is not linked to competitive structures)
A rugby fan told me a 10.70 was almost track speed and I told him Metcalf ran a 10.36 and that wasn't track speed 💀😭
"Track speed" is kind of a subjective term. In most cases, 10.7 would be considered track speed. However, if talking about WRs or DBs in an NFL game where most are former track stars, it would only be slightly above average and maybe only the guys below 10.5 are described as having track speed. I.e., it's situational.
Are you confusing Rugby League and Rugby Union?
Cause in league track speed would be 10.70. they aim for velocity over dash times the ain reach the highest possible speed over the shortest distance as a result they struggle to maintain that pace for more then 25 metres or so 50 metres at a time is pushing it. Only a handful of league players can do 10.70 for 100m
Union on the other hand 10.40 is track speed with the fastest guy currently setting 10.10.
@@louiscypher4186 track speed, is track speed, 10.10 is track speed, barely, I know we say track speed as hyperbole alot but I mean genuine track speed, like speed you could win a track meet with, 10.70 isn't winning a high school track meet anywhere in America, I know Australian track speed is considerably slower than American but come on man be real, 10.70 is average in the NFL
@@RurbanWalker I mean actual track speed, 10.7 doesn't even approach that, the average nfl receiver could run a 10.5 pretty easily if they practiced for it
@felixlara2945 like I said, situational. If watching a HS game, descrbing the receiver who ran a 10.7 or even a 10.9 the prior spring as having track speed would be a perfectly valid description. If descrbing NFL players, indeed the threshold changes to probably
Thank you for upholding the integrity and respect of Track And Field!. BBC is on some nonsense...
He definitely doesn't do that. The mass majority of his videos are loaded with nonsensical hyperbole
Bullshit broadcast corporation not a single word of truth in ten years
@veganpotterthevegan there is quite a bit of Click-Baity titles I do agree with that lol
🤣🤣
Speaking of the "ESTABLISHMENT"🥸...the sponsors are woke, liberal and ESTABLISHMENT🤢🤮 The sponsors will NOT represent WHITE sprinters like Coby Hilton and Cole Beck unless there is alot of pressure on them to🤢🤮 Thos is a huge scandal in track and sports in general🥸 Coby Hilton is a top sprinter that is getting faster and faster as time goes on and he still has problems getting a top sponsor. Cole Beck is the FASTEST football player right now and he has plans to be an Olympic Champion and an NFL player and you rarely here about him unless someone who is NOT part of the establishment talks about him🥸 He goes by Cole and Coleton Beck
Usain Bolt's 9.58 WR time if broken down beats every literal record from 10m to 100m lol. It's just a slow day at the BBC is all
That's true. It was literally THE perfect race, and to know he always struggled with his starts, I was really impressed when I saw the way he started. Still remember watching it to this day lol
@@vengance27 I believe Su Bingtian had even better starting splits when he ran 9,83 in Tokyo 2020
@@Ariskot007 He's probably got a much better 40 yard dash time
@@chrism45 his run in 9.83 was estimated to be 4.03-4.07
@@smerel12 Su Bingtian's 30m split was 3.73 (it's the unofficial world record) and so is his 60m split 6.29. Usain Bolt's splits were 3.81(some say it's 3.78) and 6.31. Bolt hit the 40m mark 4.62-4.65..ish and the 40 yard most probably 0.28 earlier, having a time of about 4.34-4.37... detract the reaction time of 0.146 (rounded up to 0.15)... and bolt's time would be 4.19-4.21. Bingtian had a very similar reaction time 0.142 and his 40 yard split without the reaction time would be probably the same 0.57 seconds after the 30 metre line, so that would make it 4.29, without the reaction time 4.13-4.14 or so.
Usain did 4.5 in jeans and out of shape, so why are they comparing an NFL player to Bolt? imagine what he would do in 2009, I don't know what's going through the minds of NFL and Soccer players now these days lmao.
And slip on sneakers
Not on a field, not in cleats, and with zero ability to catch the ball or block downfield. What a loser Bolt is.
@@dustinedwards7821 the world record holder and greatest sprinter ever and the fastest human to ever live is a loser cause he never played football? An American sport as a Jamaican? Okay bro
@@dustinedwards7821 bro Usain would jog on grass and still beat him, get out of here fanboy. even out of shape when he touched football after retiring from the track, he was too fast for anyone. he would dust the whole NFL and the soccer community, think before what you say. name someone from the nfl or in fifa to win 8 olympic gold medals? NONE.
@@bnsz8704 nah hes just someone that doesn't know him properly.
*Back in junior high I went from running 60+ seconds in the 400m to consistently running 53s. I told my coaches that when I'm a senior I want to run a 45, they laughed at me and I didn't understand why... but now I know it's because I could had quit junior high and easily got a job at the BBC*
Reminds me of my delusion as a young competitive amateur golfer with a 3 handicap and thinking if I could just cut a stroke off my score every few holes, I could play professionally. I figured I'd just be some retooling here and there. What a joke!
1:35
You actually laughed. lol
I was listening to the video as i was doig some work around the house and literally had to run over and rewind a few seconds to make sure I heard it right.
Amazing lol
so many people don't understand NFL timing system they can't wrap their head around what a difference it means to react to a start gun and reacting whenever you feel like running that's when the timing begins. Earlier NFL timing began when the runner started the person clocking reacted to them making the times much faster like .3!
Yup it’s not fully automatic so realistically all times need to add at least 0.1 seconds to find their true time whereas in T&F everything is fully automated
would you would have to have amazing reaction times to be 0.1. Don't forget Devin Allen reacted in .099 and was given a false start removed from the event. The average track athlete is about .15 in football players are not track athletes usually then if you look in the stands the coaches are using hand times which then you must add their reaction time into it let's get you around .3
That laugh after the kylian mbappe comparison was epic
The level of disrespect is ridiculous 🤦🏿♂️ they just don’t know any better
Regarding Mbappé, it wasn't even his time on a 100m dash, it was calculated/extrapolated based on the recorded top speed he had during the game.
Had a friend in high school who ran the 400 for Oregon in the late-70s, early-80s. My friend came back from college and I asked him what he was runing and he said 47, which was solid D1 at the time. I was congratulating him when he shook his head and said, "Edwin Moses runs that in the 400 hurdles." Really put things in perspective.
There's a British footballer called Malcom Mcdonald who ran a 10.9 second 100m in the tv series Superstars in 1975.
thank you for making this video... It's amazes me how quickly people forget greatness.
I think what's also deserving of a mention is 5'8" tall Su Bingtian of China, who ran an estimated 40 yard dash time of 4.05 - 4.07, giving him the fastest starting 40 yards in history. In the same run, he was clocked at an estimated 6.29 in his first 60 meters on his way to a 9.83 over a total of 100 meters. He ran this on Dec 11, 2021 in Tokyo at the age of 31 while being coached by an American. This is argued by many as the fastest starting 60 meters of all time. He is considered a great starter but not a good finisher over 100 meters.
Just remember those are estimates.
@@sydboskithey are quite accurate. Elite sprinters are way faster than nfl players.
@@JoeMama-cs3te They are still estimates and not official times. The only way to get an official time is by running that actual distance. No one is debating which sport has the faster athletes, even though the NFL had 2 former world's fastest humans play in the league.
Youre forgetting when Kim Jong Un ran it in 3.45s
Youre also forgetting Park Ji Sung ran it in 3.44s
Just now, I clocked and estimated flop onto my couch. That is JUST over 6 vertical feet away from Sotomayor! So close!
Classic 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Love the chuckle at 1.35
Honestly kinda cringe. Nobody really thinks this comparison is good
that evil laugh at 1:36 😂😂
It’s important to note that bolt ran on a track and used starting blocks. So really he’d probably be around 4.17. It’s also important to note that if he did the Xavier worthy strategy (keeping his hand on the line during the push-off), he’d probably be about 4.13. Nevertheless, that is a HUGE margin.
And it should also be noted that over short distances, NFL players are very fast. DK Metcalf, for example, was able to keep up with 10.0 sprinters for about 40-60 metres before they overtook him. So even if Bolt is drawing even with Xavier in the first 40 yards (which of course isn’t happening), we all know what happens after that.
Especially considering he’s 6’ 5” and wasn’t known for his starts. It’s his top end that was truly untouchable
@medogerty6013 I don't know what estimate running productions used, but it's incorrect. The actual 40 time during the 9.58 100 meter sprint would have been about 4.20 seconds, not 4.1
@@DANGJOSdid you factor in removing the reaction time, since the NFL combine doesn’t include that
@@BrandonLoewen Yes, I did. The number you get should be in the neighborhood of 4.20 seconds. It's more like 4.35 with reaction time, which the NFL doesn't include. But also, the way the NFL does their timing isn't clear to me anyway.
1:42 when you know track and field😭😭
World record is 3:43...so close to 2 minutes
😭😭
That time of 10.9 would have gotten a third in the local high school district ......for small schools.
Third is considerate, that's not even a medal worthy time
oof now im in 6th grade, 16.9 time, wondering how the hell will i go that quick
Xavier Worthy! Great kid! A local start from Fresno CA! The whole city is buzzing about that 40 yard dash. Hoping he has a wonderful career. Go Make Fresno Proud X
Thank you! Nuff said.😂✌🏾
I think Bolt would still win, but turf doesn't give the same energy returns as the track. It wouldn't have been a 4.08-4.13. It would have been slightly slower.
Probably close to 4.4 lets be real based on his 40 meter speed being 4.65.
these bots are actually insane no matter how much you remove them they just come back
😂😂 I saw this article too and I couldn't even read past the first sentence.
Great video, holding no punches. ❤
You not making my hs city final with that 😂
In high school baseball, I pitched 80mph...a mere 20 slower than the fastest pro pitchers at the time.
Some might say barely slower.
"A second slower" kill me🤣🤣 damn🤣🤣
The laughter made my day😅
Every sport loves to market their athletes as best in the world. Impossible to prove anything, but stirs up the conversation. This is why I hate the “GOAT” moniker when people are early in their careers…
Track athletes are extremely amazing but their not better overall athletes than soccer players or gridiron football player. Sprinters run in a straight line and are incredible at that, but other sports require far greater athletic physiologies of discipline than just running in a straight line
decathlon athletes might have an argument with that statement@@roderickclerk5904
are you advocating for worthy? because that man is never gonna be as fast as bolt🤣
@@JoeMama-cs3te football players are better complete athletes than Olympic sprinters. Id probably say gymnast are the best athletes
@@roderickclerk5904being a pro sprinter is harder than making the nfl. You cant argue with that.
I believe the fastest ANYONE has ever run in 40yards or 60 meters was Su Bingtian in the 100 semis at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. He got out of the blocks faster than anyone ever has. His only problem was at about 60 meters the rest of the field would catch him. But he ran a 9.83 in the 100m that race.
@totalrunningproductions that's the 40 yard dash time we really need, could break 4 secs?
@@KJM3SMG No, it wouldn't break 4 seconds. But I would gladly do the analysis if I can find the split times
@@DANGJOSAccording to various sources on google he was 3.73 through 30m and about 4.30 after 40 yards, but that's including reaction time (not a factor in NFL) and from start blocks (not a 3 point stance like NFL). One source claims he had a 4.07 with reaction time factored out.
@@psymar Interesting. I would love to see the split times so I can estimate it myself. I did that a long time ago for Usain Bolt's 9.58 run, and his 40 time is not what the video says. The calculation is fun to do
@@psymar That does actually sound fairly accurate, but a bit of an exaggeration.. Bolt was measured 3.81 (3.66 without reaction time) at 30 metres, 4.61s (4.46s) at 40 metres, and 6.31s at 60 metres (Bingtian's record is 6.29s.) Bolt's accelerating at that point and 0.29 seconds is by any account a very accurate interpolation for that 40 yards to 40 metres segment, so Bolt's 40 yard time was 4.32s (4.17 w/o the reaction time). I'm going to go out on a limb and say they were within a 0.01 seconds from each other in that short 6.5 metre segment. That would give Su Bingtian 4.23 to 4.25 split time at the 40 yard "mark" (it's not acually marked anywhere, now is it?). His reaction time was 0.142 and we would get something like 4.08-4.11, possibly.
Great breakdown, they just keep proving Bolts greatness with these comparisons I love it .
Thanks for giving props were props is due!!
Mbappe can almost certainly run faster than 10.9... probably estimates based on speeds seen in his games where he's running on grass and playing in studs. He's lightning as far as football players go.
Never
fr he is insanely fast. His sprint against argentina in 2018 was definitely faster than 10.9. of course he isn't as fast as a track and field athlete, but considering he has to implement many changes of directions he is really damn fast. i would be curious to see him do a 100m sprint to see his time.
Usain Bolt jogs 10.9 calm down
Mbappe ran a 100 in 10.9s on a football pitch. That's absolutely brilliant to do that whilst being in a game with 90 mins. Even bolt couldn't match his stamina and agility to speed. Saying all that, the BBC comparison was so stupid. The 10.9 was special but making it seem like he wasn't that far behind usains 9.58 is stupid
Hahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhahahahahahahahaahhahahaahhahah
I remeber when was I visiting a doctor, and told her that I do sprint. She told me that she ran a 100m for around 6sec 💀
🤣🤣
Thank you for handling this ish.
On a podcast Justin Gatlin talked about all of them running low 4's and high 3's
TRP is calling out the BBC NOW???
Imagine thinking that finishing over 10% behind someone is close. Last time I checked, speed = distance/time so it's a relatively long way
He’s faster than almost every woman who has ever ran
Let's do some number crunching about this. There are roughly 2400 million people between ages 16 and 35, let's call that the window of opportunity to dream about achieving such a thing. 1200 million boys and men. How many of them actually does that any given year? In 2023, according to IAAF's Top List statistics, 10.50 or better would make you roughly 1200th in the world rankings in 2022 or 2023. In 2016 822th, 2012 633th, 2010 529th. For 10.90, there is a pattern that it seems to be achieved by about 5 times more people (5310,5742, 3779, 3460, and 2915 in 2010). 1500m/Mile times for the same rankings are about 3:44-3:45/4:03-4:04 (10.50) and 3:56/4:15 for 10.90. There are 7699 persons in the combined world history (1 of them female) to run 10.50 or faster /w automatic timing and estimated 800 more who would have if the competitions had been auto-timed in their time. That would mean there are probably 40000-45000 people who have run under 10.90 (out of 118000 million people) during the existence of humans, 69 of them women. I say that would put you in a pretty exclusive company, actually. Last year, 1 out of 1 million (who are proper age) men ran under 10.50 , and about one out of 200,000 under 10.90. Another comparison: for ranking (regional, national or international) these marathon times are equally hard to achieve (2:17:00 for 10.50 (26,2 consecutive 5:15 miles), and 2:35:00 (26,2 consecutive 5:52 miles) for 10.90.
@@soonaherohe actually is if he did a track 100m
that laugh got me lmao
AND Bolt was NEVER known to be a great starter.....crazy top end though 💪🏿🇯🇲
Worthy Running In Football Cleats.. Coleman ran his in track spikes.. Bolt is on a track
I’m not saying that Worthy is near as fast as them but if it’s going to be accurate then it has to be done with all the same conditions and specs
Ok, you want to go there.
Usain Bolt 9.58
Christian Coleman 9.74
Xavier Worthy 10.65
Chris Johnson & John Ross 10.66
Xavier Worthy isn't even in the top 100 fastest men ever in the NFL. That's how much of a joke the 40 yard dash is in the NFL. It's not even accurate as you saw the manipulation that Xavier displayed in his NFL combines.
Fastest men ever in the NFL
1. Jim Hines 9.95
2. Trendon Holliday 10.00 twice
3. Jeff Demps 10.01
4. Jacoby Ford 10.01
5. Bob Hayes 10.06
22. Tyreek Hill 10.19
34. Deion Sanders 10.26
The supposedly "fastest top 3 NFL fastest men ever at the 40 yard dash," aren't even in the top 100 fastest men ever in the NFL. That's how slow they really are in comparison to let's say Trendon Holliday 10.00 which would have put Trendon dead last in that Olympics where Usain broke the world record. Spikes, cleats, whatever you want, the 40 yard dash is a joke!
Brother I can't speak for the others but that time for Chris Johnson is his high school time. He was faster by the time he made the NFL. He has multiple runs in the NFL where he outran guys with legitimate 10.3 100m times.
BBC: Kylian is nearly as fast as Bolt.
TRP: Oh, hell no. So - you have chosen death.
Bruh I remember when a guy my age was running 10.8 at 15 and everyone was impressed by how fast he was but no one was saying "THatS jUst OveR a SeCOnd bEhind ThE WoRLd REcord"
As soon as I saw that on Instagram I laughed for minutes straight I couldn't help it
What else is funny is that they probably got this 10.9 for Mbappe from looking at his top speed. If we took bolts top speed (~ 44km/h) and did the same, he would run like 8.2 second for the 100m. So this is just a complete non-comparison.
Not really, and I'll explain why:
In football, GPS devices are used to track players' heart rate, speed, distance, and exact location on the field, among other metrics.
Additionally, the length of a football field is known, making it easy to calculate a player's speed. It should be noted that the standard size of a football field is 105m x 68m.
While Mbappe would not be able to compete with Bolt, he could become a decent sprinter with proper training.
Mbappe achieved the 10.9 while standing, starting slowly, and looking to his teammate to receive the ball. He changed direction slowly and then sprinted the last few meters with the ball. It is important to note that running on natural grass is different from running on a track, as the soft surface absorbs most of the force exerted on the ground. I have personally experienced this while sprinting on grass, where it took me longer to get off the ground.
@@njsfer Ok, he didn't 'achieve' a 10.9 though did he? I mean since when did any footballer in the history of the game actually sprint 100 metres in one run?
The 10.9 was an estimate based on the highest velocity he achieved and extrapolated out, and wouldn't account for the obvious deceleration that a footballer would exhibit over the final 40 metres of a 100 metres run, which would be much more obvious than with an actual pro sprinter. What, you think someone actually timed Mbappe running for 100 meters from a dead start, both with and without the ball and he ran 10.9?
He wouldn't even run a 10.9 on a nice bouncy track in spikes, unless maybe he had a hurricane behind him....
@@itsinthetreesitscoming7431bro he just explained you how they calculated it, with the exact route he ran and you just start making up how they did 😂😂😂
@@itsinthetreesitscoming7431 Tell me you don't know or you've never watched football without actually telling me.
I don't know how they measured, they didn't share the methodology. But it looks like you know how they measured, so please share the link.
I just watched an older video of him running from one side of the field to the other (yes, many players do that, I'll explain why later). In this video (search for "Mbappe speed 39km") he takes 12 seconds (I timed it) to go from the goal area line to the opposite goal, which is exactly 99.5m.
But he starts slowly and only after 4 seconds he starts to accelerate, always holding on and looking like his teammate who had the ball, then he receives it and dribbles the opponent while sprinting as fast as possible, then he shoots and scores.
Unlike track where you have a lot of room to slow down, in football you have the advertising boards and you have to slow down before you even get to the end of the field.
He would easily shave off more than 1 second if he were to run straight without having to score, receive the ball, look at his teammates, and start slow.
Also, natural grass is super soft, so it absorbs a lot of the force you put into it, unlike tracks that are built to be bouncy and responsive.
He also runs in cleats, which are softer than track shoes and designed to provide a lot of grip when changing direction.
As for soccer players sprinting from one side of the field to the other, they do it when they're big so they can defend pretty well, and if there's a counterattack, they have to run all the way to their attack to score, like he did in this video. Cristiano Ronaldo does it all the time, Haaland does it a lot, Mbappé does it, a lot of players do it. The fact that you said "Since when has a footballer in the history of the game actually sprinted 100 meters in one run?" just shows that you know nothing about football.
And there's nothing wrong with that, as long as you don't talk like you know little about it.
@@njsfer why do you say "not really" when nothing you follow with disagrees with what the person before you wrote?
So you're saying Bolt would smash this dude in the 40 and then carry on running another 71 yards after he's pulled up to break the 100m world record?
Doesn't seem real does it.
Guess I should really be bragging more about my 100m time being within 3 seconds of Bolt's - didn't realize how impressive that was🤣
That laugh at 1:37 sent me. 😂
😂😂Oh boy
The timing system at the combines is based on the athletes movement and usually gives them about 0.3 - 0.5s benefit at least, compared to actual Olympic timing. Bolt’s times under those conditions would literally be in the 3.8s range under the same conditions. Ps Bolt ran 6.29s based on the more accurate cameras (not 6.31 based on the laser system)
Wait I’m actually interested in what you have to say. I’ve heard many people saying (myself included) that Bolt has the second fastest 60m split of a 100m race of all time (6.31) behind Su Bingtian’s 6.29. But I’ve also heard many people saying that Bolt’s ran 6.29 (in his 9.58), and I thought it was because they were getting mixed up with Su’s 6.29 but now I’m not so sure. If you could post links that show what you were saying then that would be great! :)
What more accurate cameras??
@@DANGJOS That’s what I’m wondering. Interesting to know whether he ran 6.29 or 6.31 for his first 60m
It's also from a flying start, nothing like a standing start, which makes the estimated time even slower than 10.9.
He has incredible potential if he really focused on the 100, still not even close to bolt
That into almost made me cry for real 😂😢
Imagine responding to this comparison not knowing this was based on in-game speeds, running on grass with football boots, and possibly even with the ball at his feet.
He's obvs never going to beat Bolt, or any other major sprinter, but the responses are as dumb and disingenuous as the original comparison.
it's not with the ball. the "study" is hard to track down but it's just extrapolated distance covered over time. yes in boots, yes on grass. but it wouldn't matter is the point. i mean he's far from slow. idk why they used that data in that way - it makes him look bad. but comparing anyone to Usain bolt makes every human on the planet slow. there's nothing dumb or disingenuous about that. whoever used the stat like this originally set him up to fail that's the only dumb decision
No, not possibly even with the ball at his feet. Cmon.
The guy calls football - football and not the s word. He got my full respect and attention.
cry about it. association football is soccer
@@hello-rq8kf Yeah you would think people would pick another hill to die on.
Wonder what Su Bingtan (probably misspelled wrong) would run for his 40 yard dash as he clocked a 60m split of 6.29
The laugh😂😂😂😂😂😂😂❤
Why do other sports jump on the opportunity to trash track athletes when we literally have the hardest sport😭
Hardest my ass
I don’t think I’d ever say that a mostly non contact sport (it gets dirty in those distance events) is the hardest sport. Track and field is harder and more technical and strategic then most people give it credit for but I wouldn’t say that it is the hardest due to it being an individual non contact sport.
hardest sport based on what?
sure bro
Bolt came to my college to speak because some of his Jamaican track teammates went to my school. After his speech he offered to race anyone interested. Keepnin mind he’s in a suit and tire and has fancy dress shoes on. 3 of us were brave enough to get royally embarrassed. He was so fast he gave us all a 20 meter head start in the hundred. He caught us all by the 40 meter mark and ran the rest of the race backwards while waiving at all of us. One of the guys racing with me was a 2 time Maryland state champ in the hundred and we all got completely embarrassed. Bolt is faster than you’d ever think a human could go. I really feel like he could chase down a cheetah at times. I know he can’t and that’s overkill but that’s how fast he looks.
I tell non-T&F people that a 1 second difference is roughly a 10m gap in the 100m and 200m at the pro level. Close on paper but not on the track lol
Absolutely love your analysis,you always put things in perspective!!!
Bolt is the GOAT 🐐 and the funny part about it is he could have ran even faster. He usually lets up off the gas right at the end lol
3:57 I think it's quite realistic for a footballer to run competitive sprint times and still have endurance. Basing this on the fact I was a sub 11 sprinter playing 90 minute football games. Due to the fact my top speed was significantly higher than most players on the pitch I wasn't constantly running at my stop speed. So I always had enough in the tank to cover the mileage in a 90 min game.
i think you’re all missing the point, i don’t think they are saying he is a competitor to bolt but that even though he plays a sport much more based on longer distances that mbappe still has a very fast time this is highlighted by the fact that they never day in their post that he is a competitor but instead they put a surprise emoji highliting their surprise at how fast he is for his sport
Plus one athlete plays on grass or turf and the other on a track so it’s harder to compare speed
I could've sworn that Bo Jackson ran a 4.12 second 40-yard dash...
Yes, that's the legend. No video or proof though.
I remember 2009 championship when i seen a 9 with 5 beside i knew at 15 yo that record was untouchable....Usain will become a myth/legend with time best athlete i ever seen
1:52 a second off is a lot like I used to do a 50 yard dash in about 7.5 seconds getting down a 6.8 took me so long I never thought I’d get there
Thank god , u said everything right.
Comedy😂 Great analysis
For perspective: There are LINEMAN running sub 4.7 40's in the NFL Combine.
De La Salle High's (NorCal) last competitive Championship teams RB ran the same 40 as my HS running back: 4.7 flat. And, he would dust a LOT of the areas defenses (in 1996/97... We played Valley Highschool when they played Grant Highschool for the area Championships, before-Grant-headed to State).
I was considered fast, and he would leave us all by about 5-10 yards (in any footrace).
Whatever the Bbc was smokin’ must’ve been really good stuff
There was a high school track meet in Dallas last year where a 10.9 would have been 6th place...thats one meet of one district of one city....of teenagers.
The reality is that bolts weakness was the start to his race so his 40 isn’t as impressive as you’d think it is. Bolts first 30m in his race was 3.634 seconds if you take off reaction time. Then if you add in his average speed from 30-40m for the remaining 6.576 meters to make 40 yards, you get something around 4.19-4.21. Bolt excelled at high top end speed and maintaining that speed to pull away from competition. Very rarely was bolt the first one to 20-30 meters
Yes, thank you! That is the correct way to do the calculation! I went backwards from 40 meters, rather than forwards from 30 meters like you did, but it doesn't matter. I got about 4.20 seconds. Also, it should be slightly slower than the average of the 30-40 meter time, but regardless, largely correct. I'm not sure where Total Running Productions got their estimate, but they were mistaken in their calculations.
I ran the calculations of the Mbappe example. Assuming ideal conditions (both racers instantaneously accelerate to their average speed in their runs and maintain it throughout the run):
1. Mbappe would be running about 1.25 m/s slower than Bolt (9.174 m/s vs. 10.438 m/s)
2. By the time Bolt crossed the finish line, Mbappe would be about 11.1101 meters behind him. (For my fellow Americans that’s about 36 and a half feet)
Yeah that "25m behind" is so off target...
The time for bolt he had starting block to accelerate quicker.
Bolt had to slow down before the finish line at the Super Bowl because there was barely any room after the line before the wall. You can clearly see that when watching the sprint
Like how is no one noticing he couldn't run straight through the 40 line and had to slow down early lol
Did you mention how Mbappe's speed was probably recorded starting from a point where Mbappe was probably already moving while sprinters start stationary?
3:55 except for that one time a certain Mr Bolt was on the football pitch
Si bingtians 40 yard split in the Tokyo Olympics was 3.99
2:00 Crazy how Yohan Blake was the only one running into a headwind in that top 10.
bro usain bolt was literally wearing hey dudes 😂😂
Did anyone notice the name of ELUID KIPCHOGE in 10th position at 0:49? That was back in 2012 - 12 years ago. I for one, didn't know that he had that kind of speed.
And then it also speaks of his longevity in distance running.
you wanna talk longevity? He is the 5000m world champion of 2003! That race vs Bekele and ElGuerrouj is a must watch by the way
The problem with trying to extrapolate times is that you don't figure in fatigue. Yes, he might be fast for about 30 meters but can he sustain, get faster, or hit a wall before the finish line.
one is pressing to a 40y finish line and one is running beyond to a 100m Finish Line
tbh if it werent for the emoji i would have just thought that post was just to show how much faster Bolt was
How many goles has Usain Bolt scored in any FIFA official game????
1:23 I just assumed they were trying to do Mbappe in haha that's the difference between elite men & women over 100m. That's like saying a driver in F1 on a quali lap was "just over a second" behind his teammate lol he's probably getting fired before the next race. to be fair, the actual underlying data on givemesport made it pretty clear Bolt was significantly faster and it wasn't meant to compare the two just because of how far ahead usain is so it's on the BBC really
Coming like when Perez is a second behind Max in quali and someone thinks that’s not a bad job
That’s a whole chasm of time lol
Yeah that makes sense, comparing a second difference between two subjects running to two F1 cars travelling at 180 mph....
I appreciate it when people call out exaggerations in track, and it seems to happen all the time. You called out the BBC for their obvious exaggeration. However you also exaggerated yourself by saying if Mbappe ran a 10.9 he would be 20 to 25 meters behind Bolt when he cross the finish line of his 9.58 or actually 9.572 world record 100 meter race. Mbappe would be between 1.3 and 1.4 seconds behind Bolt. There is no way a human being can run 25 meters or even 20 meters in 1.4 seconds. Not even Bolt himself could run that fast. He would probably be more like 14 or 15 meters behind, not 20 and certainly not 25. Just want to set the record straight.
Let me guess, Mbappe also had a running start when they "clocked" that time 😂😂🤣🤣😭😭
Definitely. And it's just an extrapolation from a short surge. That people think he literally covered 100m in 10.9 while kicking a ball is hilarious/sad.
A soccer fan once told me soccer players were actually faster than nfl players and i asked him how he would know that since none of them get tracked for time like an nfl combine.
Everybody with normal brain realizes such comparisons are stupid and only good for selling newspapers. Making video about it also puts you in the same category.
It's ignorance. When I joined the Air Force in 1987, I ran a 9.9 in the 100 YARD dash during the bootcamp intramural games. They went crazy,! I did not have the heart to explain that a handheld 9.9 in the 100 yard dash was like an 11.0 second 100m run with an electronic timer. To them, I was the second coming of Carl Lewis. And I had been a 400m specialist in high school and my freshman year in college before going the AF at 19.