I don't have an apu unit they cost to much money.... what I did drivers that read the comments...I bought a predator 3500 quiet generator inverter at harbor freight put insurance on it, put it in the back outside the cab with a chain and lock plugged it into the plug port on the bottom of the drivers door to power on all the plugs in the truck. Then I bought a ac unit and a small little heater and plug them in depending on the weather and a small lil 40 buck heater kept me warm in -3 weather last year I just close the front curtains not the back and place it between the 2 front seats.. and the ac unit I bought a portable 8000 btu unit at wal mart and that keeps me real cool in the summer just turn off the eco mode on the generator and it'll pick up that ac unit real good plus that generator last you 10 hrs on non eco mode and 12 with eco mode...I basically engineered my own apu for 1200 bucks
Those trucks are the ultimate set up! I drive a 2022 Freightliner (with 475 hp DD15, 12 spd DT12, 2.64 ratio, with diesel apu) governed at 71 mph) and I getting 8.2 mpg at 44 mph average speed with 450:35 hour on per 19,549.7 miles (average 24000 lbs, and runnin all 11 western states.. I've got 9.0 mpg at 47 mph average with 45:37 hrs on within the last 2,123.8 miles.. these cascadias are king of the road bro! I don't use cruise control.
You are spot on ! I bought fuel using mudflap yesterday and saved 160 bucks in Missouri. 3.90 at Casey's:). Fuel report with my 07 387 pete. C15 CAT DELETED, SINGLE TURBO . Pittsburgh power muffler . 550 hp 2050 tq. Driving average 60 mph . Using my foot and keeping my boost down she's getting 8.74 mpg. But if I use cruise and drive 70 mph I'm down to 6.8 . Huge difference. Last winter 60 mph 8.48 . Pretty good for a C15 meow meow
Same discussion I had with myself buying a vehicle for Uber. My Sienna hybrid got twice the MPG of anything used. EVERYBODY said get used! When vehicle prices thru the roof, bought new and just grind away. Immaculate kept, serviced, babied equals $$$. Could never bring myself to give away 30K miles of revenue at $1.50 to save a few dollars on the front end. I can see a CDL and a truck in my future. Your videos are helpful. Not to mention, if I am living in the vehicle there is a comfort and enjoyment aspect. Don't want somebody's stink in my truck.
It's funny to see trucking companies brag about fuel consumption savings by limiting the trucks speed. What they fail to mention...here's some maths for you. Distance of 75 miles Fuel/gallon $4.75 $0.60/mile (driver pay).... 75mph @ 7mpg=10.8gallons=$51.30 for fuel (1hour) 64mph @ 8.2mpg = 9.24gallons (75miles) = $43.89 (1 hour 10 minutes) So the company saves $7.41 on 75 miles, but the driver loses out on $6.60/hour pay. So it could be said that nearly every penny the company "saves" is money out of the drivers paycheck..but hey, who cares right? Also, the lower the fuel costs and the amount 'saved' is even less, but the amount lost by the driver remains the same.
Huh. That was a first. I passed one of your trucks a few minutes ago, as of the time of writing this comment, headed eastbound on I-70 just west of Indianapolis. Specifically, it was truck 697. The guy driving was very much paying attention to the road, had both hands on the wheel, and in general seemed happy. So, yeah. Keep up the good work
Excellent content, great/valuable info to help teach us how to not only save money but how to make more money (saving equals making). I can imagine that this fuel saving (idling and acceleration habits) will also cut down on the wear and tare of the trucks, which would also save us repair cost. Great info, great video👍🏿
The active Cruise control on my Mercedes’ Actros ,which basically is a Freightliner 🤷♂️ in my opinion used properly is the biggest fuel saver and with a little bit of clever coasting on my truck,in the summer when the air is a bit thiner I got 11.5 to the gallon fully freighted,I just watched your video your right about them old trucks 🤷♂️
Hi I would like to mention an other factor for fuel economy is the quality of the fuel that you put in the tank over here in uk if we go to large bunker station the fuel generally doesn’t have many additives in it so we started an experiment and started to use BP Or Shell derv we have achieved about.5 of a mile to the galon and the truck runs a lot better
It can be very difficult for many individuals to purchased a unit without the bias of the look/layout of the bunk. I myself am a efficiency/reliability chaser. I want the most fuel efficient truck with the most reliability. Have to say from the newest stock truck, the t680, Pete 579, cascadia, Volvo (1-5 in rating) look great. However they look, they still have to make the most $ to be profitable. When are you going to get your guys some super sleeper for you otr drivers? lol jk you wouldn’t do that (o.op. Dream machine)
Wow 64 mph , no wonder why so many Canada trucks are blocking up the highway. That's dangerous actually it causes nothing but backups on the road. Speed limits hit 80 in Texas WOW
Those long hood Peterbilts and Kenworth are more reliable and last longer compared to those spaceships. To say there garbage just because they save less fuel is ridiculous. I got a 2015 389 Peterbilt ran it in the oilfields dirt roads you name it. Hauling 90k lbs of crude oil, now have it running regional doing flatbed still running like a champ. Meanwhile all i see are Freightliners at my local diesel shop. As a owner operator those are the trucks to have. But it makes sense that big carriers have them space ships to save fuel.
Also tell me the last time you saw a 389 on the side of the road taking a nap. These aero trucks are not stable and they're killing drivers but hey at least the fleet owners are making more money!! This is blood money IDC what anyone says. I drive a 2022 389 now. I'll never go back to an automatic transmission aero death machine. Even the 579 and t680 is respectable. The cascadia is a rolling death trap.
@@Gabe4D I agree, The late model Freightliner Cascadia is the most dangerously unstable truck on the road today. The steering and suspension have glaring issues that do not inspire confidence whatsoever.
If you keep 11000 pounds on the front axle stability is not an issue, getting used to the light steering is an issue...that is easily overcome. I would rather drive a 9.3 mpg Cascadia than a small cab large car 6.5 mpg Pete.
@@Gabe4D Way more Cascadia's on the road than 389s... For every 100 Cascadia's theres probably ONE idiot driving a 389... Do the math on who you're more likely to see broken down.
Another great video but, I see you walking gradually down the road of self- automation or autonomous vehicles. Cruise control, automatic engine shutoff, automatic engine start up,etc. Soon you'll be saying the most efficient way is without the driver. You're already saying it.
9.9???? I got excited there for a minute until you said volvo lol( I really want to hear what the driver has to say, also try to get the routes and load weights for those 2 weeks Ronan so we have a full picture on what on the world it's going on, thanks for that valuable information
Guys who talk about idling being bad never drove a truck for even a day . This guy needs to get inside a truck when it's 80 degrees outside it's 110 inside without ac . OK in the cold as bunk heaters work good but even 70 degrees outside is 95 degrees inside. Don't tell me open window because trucks sitting next to you idling smoke you out
This is a question??? What if you are driving in the winter time and you are in a very cold 🥶 state..it's it better to idle the truck..therefore, the diesel ⛽️ and def don't freeze up????????
The battery powered APU isn't enough to keep the truck cool on hot days. I drove a 2023 cascadia from the beginning of April to the end of June this year and down in Arizona or if I was taking a break during the day, I absolutely had to use opti idle and my idle percentage was higher. The reason these aero trucks are garbage is because they hit bumps too hard. I like my 389 because the ride is much better with the longer wheel base and front set axle. The Apu's have maintenance costs on top of the up front cost. Plus if they break, you're back to idling until it's fixed. Running 64 mph all day is making your drivers spend more of their time to run the same miles. I'm so glad I stopped working for these fleets run like guys such as Ronen. I'm sure he's making good money, in fact I have no doubt he is. But I've driven 389, cascadia, t680, 579. Automatic, 13 spd, 10 spd, and an 18 speed (which I'm in currently), and the long nose truck without the rpm/speed governed is the safest way to operate a truck. My boss trusts me to help him save money in exchange for the freedom and it's worth it.
Two real questions: 1. how come no solar on the roof to run the APU? Wouldn’t that cut down on operating costs? 2. Wouldn’t big bunk sleepers make for better rested drivers and better retention? Not a trucker but interested.
Solar panels on the roof to exist they are not good though they get dirty so the become less efficient also they don’t have enough watts to really make a difference
Respectfully I will have to disagree with you on the Freighliner topic. Don't get me wrong, it must be the most popular truck out there, nothing wrong with it. However, the main reason as to why it maybe more fuel efficient has to do more with the weight of the unit. You know, a freightshaker didn't get the nick name for being particularly smooth. It may be economical and all but much lighter which during big crosswinds with rain, snow, you'll be hanging into with white knuckles. No criticizing your beand of choice, everyone likes what they like..If I was given the choice I'll go with the KW with a Cummins, but it'll need to have an 18 speed manual, more flexibility and more control, specially with heavy loads and running out west..just saying. Overall I like your channel, and all you do to help out all drivers out here.. Respectfully "Reap"
Ronen I’m 100% with everything you said I’ve been thinking about upgrading but do you think it’s worth it now for 2023 with these prices on these trucks now at $210,000 in the US TIA.
Thinking of buying one 2024 Freightliner with x15 Cummins Could you help me buddy ?? I heard both good and bad things for Cummins and Detroit in Freightliner
So I have to ask Ronen and I'm not in your business- to get the best fuel economy which also contributes to longer life and less wear and tear on the entire vehicle - you have them governed at 61? I think? At any rate, that means that whoever dispatches them understands they will be traveling slower to shippers. Deliveries won't be as fast. So does that hurt the company's bottom line overall?
I just got in to a new Cascadia and was wondering if they get better fuel mileage after they get broken in. Currently 6.5 mpg but thought it would be better. I have an automatic. Detroit.
The DD15 is a dog and gutless when pulling uphill. It may be able to get decent fuel economy for a 15 litre engine but boy the power band is awfully disappointing.
I do 45-55 maxed out weight depending on my entrance speed up 6% grades anything under 35k and the truck barely slows down so I’m happy DD15 550hp 2050ftlbs gen5 carb22 engine 2.85 rears 8.5-9.2mpg if the road is flat forget about it I can cruise at 72 and only spin 1200rpm he right a setup 2023 Cascadia is the best truck right now for OTR not even close.
@@Genkevintaylor21225 Depends on what model year DD15 (Uncle Truckus) probably is referring to the later DD15s with the twin scroll turbo and he is right that engine has a very narrow power curve 505 hp @ 1630 rpm and only has 350 hp @ 1900. Sounds like you have the older version DD15 with variable geometry turbo which has a wider power curve. To get what you have today you need to get the DD16 which has the wider power curve.
@@bertriedstra4 correct, I am taking about the 2023 DD15 because the subject of the video we are commenting on is the 2023 Freightliner Cascadia which features that specific engine. I have driven that truck with that engine extensively to include over challenging passes such as Monteagle with 80k gross and it was disappointing if not borderline dangerous at times due to the rate of how quickly it slows down and impedes traffic as a result.
Ronen, do you see any extra expenses for maintenance and repair from a 23 cascadia to a 23 Volvo? People seem to talk about exhaust, egr, and electrical with the Volvos?
I have those photos of the electric freightliner but I did not receive an email address. If you would like those give me your email. Also I am driving a 2023 Kenworth t680 with an x15 Cummins engine. My mileage is as follows. At 67 mph I'm getting approximately 9.2 on flat. At 65 miles per hour I'm getting approximately 9.8 on flat. At 63 miles per hour I'm getting 10.2 to 10.4 on flat.
The lane assist sensor screams at me even when I have to use it, like warning people of my intent to merge lanes. The truck tries to do all the thinking for me for when to slow down for sadety, which sucks because the truck is a idiot and often makes the wrong calls. And as of right now. Me and my co-driver are sitting in a tow-truck getting a ride to the location that our truck with 10k miles on its is being towed to. This is the 5th truck of driving for more than a week since iv been driving. It the first truck with less than 300k that iv driven, and it is by far the worst truck iv ever driven and I thought this before it broke down.
I get 12 hrs out of mine in eco mode and it’s cold as shit in my bunk and I was parked in the desert as long as u got good batteries and when u do have to replace em get the best u good when u have the epu in a new truck it’s mandatory that u get the upgraded insulation package from the factory they won’t let you order one and not the other and trust me it works it cut down on the noise from outside and vibration also the temperature is stable in the sleeper the divider curtains are thick as hell
The battery APU is much more reliable than the TriPac Diesel as well. Even when the batteries need to be replaced after a couple years, you can do that at any shop; no waiting for a Thermo King to have an open slot to work on the generator.
Micro management of your drivers. Slow acceleration, 64mph and reduced engine power? Can't get anywhere. Can lose 60-100 miles a day which means less home time and more hours working without being paid. Then company be asking why you late??
"The best MPG may have a return on lower DPG" MPG "Miles Per Gallon" DPG "Dollars Per Gallon" What's your DPG? That would inform the rest of us of what your business model really is. A company running a DPG of $15 - $20 versus a company with DPG $10- $15 would have a fuel cost 100% lower! What's your overall overhead? Do you need maximum MPG to support it on the backs of treating your drivers to cookie cutter trucks, freight & driving practices? MPG must never be the only consideration at the cost of DPG Companies running trucks that you criticize have this figured out.
Most loads don pay well enough to run hard and at the end of the day you'll will almost never see the day we get paid based on how many loads you ran in a month.. the numbers he focus on are obviously tailored to his operation, but the more efficient burnage of fuel is always top dog bro, no matter the pay per load
@@BiggDogg8993 Net profit is key and some drivers can get more done than others. Some of my lower MPG drivers bring home more net profit. So fuel is not always the only consideration. I will agree with you where cookie cutter fleets and freight are concerned it's what they focus on due to slim margins.
I would not drive for this guy. I understand why he is doing the things he’s doing, but governing a truck at 64 mph is just stupid. It becomes dangerous to not be able to keep up with the flow of traffic. I worked for a company that governed their trucks at 60 back in the 90’s. If you drive with the idea to turn the cruise off so someone can pass you, then you are not being as fuel efficient as you can be. Also, I guarantee you that I can get better fuel milage out of a vehicle with a manual transmission. You have to keep your foot out of it going through the gear box. It allows you to shift at the the most efficient rpm’s.
I agree then you’re left going 15 miles up a hill I know gearing and more plays a big part but when you detune a truck to go 65 I swear it Kills the truck power on hills
Still the cascadia is a complete heap of junk. Who knows what else they cut corners to cheap out on quality. Especially after the covid shutdown on parts manufacturers. I have a 2019/20 and after 250k it rides like garbage from the cheap suspension and steering components, the copied airlines storage compartment struts have no gas left, constant acm codes, brake lights stick on, wiring harnesses chaff from all the shaking (they aren't modular harnesses, its one huge one throughout the frame), cab mounts worn out, the window switch broke. If all this happened to a 2020 model a 2023 will be 3x worse. The trucks are junk compared to the last gen 2017.
😂😂facts. My brother work for your company Ronan I can tell you exactly what he's experiencing. He doesn't run mountains 99% Toronto down Indiana, midwest area and back to Calgary. Then Calgary south to midwest and back to Calgary or Toronto and such. Never pulled heavy weights running van. Mostly he told me 24000 lbs at the most so he's experience 8mpg with no head winds otherwise 6 or less with headwinds with 2020 cascadia. And he's being experience break down constantly with the truck three weeks in a row. My 2007 columbia gets 7.8mpg with egr module delete run same route as my brother run for your company Ronan. Not much to brag at least my truck doesn't break down like your new cascadia...and most importantly NO MONTHLY PAYMENTS. Try to actually compare apples to apples like running mountains then have the fuel economy then we'll see the real result. Otherwise is just false comparison. But watching your few video knowing you're only focus on fuel economy only and forget to mentioned any other cost is really not telling the whole entire story. Very biased 😂😂😂
![Megan Thee Stallion - Neva Play (feat. RM) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TpYTyAaTRts/mqdefault.jpg)
I don't have an apu unit they cost to much money.... what I did drivers that read the comments...I bought a predator 3500 quiet generator inverter at harbor freight put insurance on it, put it in the back outside the cab with a chain and lock plugged it into the plug port on the bottom of the drivers door to power on all the plugs in the truck. Then I bought a ac unit and a small little heater and plug them in depending on the weather and a small lil 40 buck heater kept me warm in -3 weather last year I just close the front curtains not the back and place it between the 2 front seats.. and the ac unit I bought a portable 8000 btu unit at wal mart and that keeps me real cool in the summer just turn off the eco mode on the generator and it'll pick up that ac unit real good plus that generator last you 10 hrs on non eco mode and 12 with eco mode...I basically engineered my own apu for 1200 bucks
Great Job Boss!
Those trucks are the ultimate set up! I drive a 2022 Freightliner (with 475 hp DD15, 12 spd DT12, 2.64 ratio, with diesel apu) governed at 71 mph) and I getting 8.2 mpg at 44 mph average speed with 450:35 hour on per 19,549.7 miles (average 24000 lbs, and runnin all 11 western states.. I've got 9.0 mpg at 47 mph average with 45:37 hrs on within the last 2,123.8 miles.. these cascadias are king of the road bro! I don't use cruise control.
You are spot on ! I bought fuel using mudflap yesterday and saved 160 bucks in Missouri. 3.90 at Casey's:). Fuel report with my 07 387 pete. C15 CAT DELETED, SINGLE TURBO . Pittsburgh power muffler . 550 hp 2050 tq. Driving average 60 mph . Using my foot and keeping my boost down she's getting 8.74 mpg. But if I use cruise and drive 70 mph I'm down to 6.8 . Huge difference. Last winter 60 mph 8.48 . Pretty good for a C15 meow meow
I drive a 2020 cascadia. The most important thing is how heavy is the load! 45,000 i bet you nobody is getting 8.6 miles per gallons.
Same discussion I had with myself buying a vehicle for Uber. My Sienna hybrid got twice the MPG of anything used. EVERYBODY said get used! When vehicle prices thru the roof, bought new and just grind away. Immaculate kept, serviced, babied equals $$$. Could never bring myself to give away 30K miles of revenue at $1.50 to save a few dollars on the front end. I can see a CDL and a truck in my future. Your videos are helpful. Not to mention, if I am living in the vehicle there is a comfort and enjoyment aspect. Don't want somebody's stink in my truck.
It's funny to see trucking companies brag about fuel consumption savings by limiting the trucks speed. What they fail to mention...here's some maths for you.
Distance of 75 miles
Fuel/gallon $4.75
$0.60/mile (driver pay)....
75mph @ 7mpg=10.8gallons=$51.30 for fuel (1hour)
64mph @ 8.2mpg = 9.24gallons (75miles) = $43.89 (1 hour 10 minutes)
So the company saves $7.41 on 75 miles, but the driver loses out on $6.60/hour pay. So it could be said that nearly every penny the company "saves" is money out of the drivers paycheck..but hey, who cares right? Also, the lower the fuel costs and the amount 'saved' is even less, but the amount lost by the driver remains the same.
600k miles with 3k hours runtime....DAMN THAT TRUCK IS FAAAAST 😁👍
Huh. That was a first.
I passed one of your trucks a few minutes ago, as of the time of writing this comment, headed eastbound on I-70 just west of Indianapolis.
Specifically, it was truck 697. The guy driving was very much paying attention to the road, had both hands on the wheel, and in general seemed happy.
So, yeah. Keep up the good work
I saw the video on my tv but I had to put a comment through my phone , really good content 👍👍👍👍👍👍
You guys are almost to 100k. That’s quite a jump from 60k in a short time. Nice job!!!
You should award your efficient drivers!
Excellent content, great/valuable info to help teach us how to not only save money but how to make more money (saving equals making). I can imagine that this fuel saving (idling and acceleration habits) will also cut down on the wear and tare of the trucks, which would also save us repair cost.
Great info, great video👍🏿
Im in a new 23. 11k miles on it. Average 8.5 mpg at 50 mph. Has the full aero with the flow below system.
Ok…..I’m gonna go out and buy one these new Cascadias with your specs! If I don’t get at least 8.6 I’m gonna……………………………………
I talked ro a guy driving a new t680 and he said he was getting 6.8 but it has the x15 and he drives fast .
The active Cruise control on my Mercedes’ Actros ,which basically is a Freightliner 🤷♂️ in my opinion used properly is the biggest fuel saver and with a little bit of clever coasting on my truck,in the summer when the air is a bit thiner I got 11.5 to the gallon fully freighted,I just watched your video your right about them old trucks 🤷♂️
Hi I would like to mention an other factor for fuel economy is the quality of the fuel that you put in the tank over here in uk if we go to large bunker station the fuel generally doesn’t have many additives in it so we started an experiment and started to use BP
Or Shell derv we have achieved about.5 of a mile to the galon and the truck runs a lot better
It can be very difficult for many individuals to purchased a unit without the bias of the look/layout of the bunk. I myself am a efficiency/reliability chaser. I want the most fuel efficient truck with the most reliability. Have to say from the newest stock truck, the t680, Pete 579, cascadia, Volvo (1-5 in rating) look great. However they look, they still have to make the most $ to be profitable.
When are you going to get your guys some super sleeper for you otr drivers? lol jk you wouldn’t do that (o.op. Dream machine)
I bought a new TK apu, w/bunk heater; money well invested. I don't idle but most of my issues with my cascadia has been aftertreatment related.
Your always giving Great And very Detailed information. I love you man!! No Homo lol. Thanks for all the advice bro
We run to greatfalls and back to pdx twice weekly. We never see over 7
Oh?
Vistatrans pays less than I'm making with 6 months experience doing line haul lol
Wow 64 mph , no wonder why so many Canada trucks are blocking up the highway. That's dangerous actually it causes nothing but backups on the road. Speed limits hit 80 in Texas WOW
Waiting for Kenworth t680 as well....i wanna see what those next gen peccar is capable of.
If you watched Henry Albert from team run smart he can get 9-10 mpg running 70+
Ronen like always, I enjoy watching your videos. Kudos
Excellent 😊
Those long hood Peterbilts and Kenworth are more reliable and last longer compared to those spaceships. To say there garbage just because they save less fuel is ridiculous. I got a 2015 389 Peterbilt ran it in the oilfields dirt roads you name it. Hauling 90k lbs of crude oil, now have it running regional doing flatbed still running like a champ. Meanwhile all i see are Freightliners at my local diesel shop. As a owner operator those are the trucks to have. But it makes sense that big carriers have them space ships to save fuel.
Also tell me the last time you saw a 389 on the side of the road taking a nap. These aero trucks are not stable and they're killing drivers but hey at least the fleet owners are making more money!! This is blood money IDC what anyone says. I drive a 2022 389 now. I'll never go back to an automatic transmission aero death machine. Even the 579 and t680 is respectable. The cascadia is a rolling death trap.
@@Gabe4D I agree, The late model Freightliner Cascadia is the most dangerously unstable truck on the road today. The steering and suspension have glaring issues that do not inspire confidence whatsoever.
If you keep 11000 pounds on the front axle stability is not an issue, getting used to the light steering is an issue...that is easily overcome.
I would rather drive a 9.3 mpg Cascadia than a small cab large car 6.5 mpg Pete.
@@Gabe4D Way more Cascadia's on the road than 389s... For every 100 Cascadia's theres probably ONE idiot driving a 389... Do the math on who you're more likely to see broken down.
@@potatopotato8360 shhh...no logic allowed lol
I liked the clip , but I really don't like Frightliner truck!
Thank you !
Ronan why no DEF consumption numbers???
Because it's not a big amount. It cost me $30 per week!!!!!
Right on time 🔥
Another great video but, I see you walking gradually down the road of self- automation or autonomous vehicles. Cruise control, automatic engine shutoff, automatic engine start up,etc. Soon you'll be saying the most efficient way is without the driver. You're already saying it.
Spot on for sure
9.9???? I got excited there for a minute until you said volvo lol( I really want to hear what the driver has to say, also try to get the routes and load weights for those 2 weeks Ronan so we have a full picture on what on the world it's going on, thanks for that valuable information
Wish he would just share his last 4 quarters of IFTA returns. That's the real fleet MPG. Summer MPG is going to be 20% higher for everyone.
Great video. Have you ever bought a western star or are you getting a t680? Love to see your real time #'s on those units. Keep on trucking
I'm convinced on the cascadia, probably gonna get manual ones too
Thx Konan ! Good luck
That's Konen to you.
Guys who talk about idling being bad never drove a truck for even a day . This guy needs to get inside a truck when it's 80 degrees outside it's 110 inside without ac . OK in the cold as bunk heaters work good but even 70 degrees outside is 95 degrees inside. Don't tell me open window because trucks sitting next to you idling smoke you out
Thats what an apu is for.
This is a question??? What if you are driving in the winter time and you are in a very cold 🥶 state..it's it better to idle the truck..therefore, the diesel ⛽️ and def don't freeze up????????
The battery powered APU isn't enough to keep the truck cool on hot days. I drove a 2023 cascadia from the beginning of April to the end of June this year and down in Arizona or if I was taking a break during the day, I absolutely had to use opti idle and my idle percentage was higher.
The reason these aero trucks are garbage is because they hit bumps too hard. I like my 389 because the ride is much better with the longer wheel base and front set axle. The Apu's have maintenance costs on top of the up front cost. Plus if they break, you're back to idling until it's fixed.
Running 64 mph all day is making your drivers spend more of their time to run the same miles. I'm so glad I stopped working for these fleets run like guys such as Ronen. I'm sure he's making good money, in fact I have no doubt he is. But I've driven 389, cascadia, t680, 579. Automatic, 13 spd, 10 spd, and an 18 speed (which I'm in currently), and the long nose truck without the rpm/speed governed is the safest way to operate a truck. My boss trusts me to help him save money in exchange for the freedom and it's worth it.
Two real questions: 1. how come no solar on the roof to run the APU? Wouldn’t that cut down on operating costs? 2. Wouldn’t big bunk sleepers make for better rested drivers and better retention? Not a trucker but interested.
Big bunks have issues with size in Canada.
Weight
Solar panels on the roof to exist they are not good though they get dirty so the become less efficient also they don’t have enough watts to really make a difference
Why no diesel APU's? Cut idle time completely then. Obviously they need fuel too but perhaps better overall.
They use way less fuel. Like a pint per hour v gallon from the truck.
Respectfully I will have to disagree with you on the Freighliner topic. Don't get me wrong, it must be the most popular truck out there, nothing wrong with it. However, the main reason as to why it maybe more fuel efficient has to do more with the weight of the unit. You know, a freightshaker didn't get the nick name for being particularly smooth. It may be economical and all but much lighter which during big crosswinds with rain, snow, you'll be hanging into with white knuckles. No criticizing your beand of choice, everyone likes what they like..If I was given the choice I'll go with the KW with a Cummins, but it'll need to have an 18 speed manual, more flexibility and more control, specially with heavy loads and running out west..just saying. Overall I like your channel, and all you do to help out all drivers out here.. Respectfully "Reap"
Thanks man
Ronen I’m 100% with everything you said I’ve been thinking about upgrading but do you think it’s worth it now for 2023 with these prices on these trucks now at $210,000 in the US TIA.
Thinking of buying one 2024 Freightliner with x15 Cummins
Could you help me buddy ??
I heard both good and bad things for Cummins and Detroit in Freightliner
nice
Hello there, why you decided to go with batteries apu instead of diesel, what was the main reason, thanks!!!
U will like it u will save money I got one
I'm curious why you choose the DD15 over the DD13?
Wouldn't the 13 get better M.P.G.?
Those are nice trucks!
Vista Trans, is hiring Canadian Drivers for its US company ? PS: love your content.
What if dodge made semi Trucks that would be big for America 🇺🇸
Idling shorten your injectors life
So I have to ask Ronen and I'm not in your business- to get the best fuel economy which also contributes to longer life and less wear and tear on the entire vehicle - you have them governed at 61? I think? At any rate, that means that whoever dispatches them understands they will be traveling slower to shippers. Deliveries won't be as fast. So does that hurt the company's bottom line overall?
That 1 driver idles because he's not taught how to operate that nice truck
What is the governed speed?
What’s the name of them black things around them rim on the drive tires ?
Just wondering what are you running on the back end Duels on Super Singles?
What is different between 2019 and 2023 nothing
I just got in to a new Cascadia and was wondering if they get better fuel mileage after they get broken in. Currently 6.5 mpg but thought it would be better. I have an automatic. Detroit.
Check your rear ends
Listenable From Satiscandy ASMR
Somewhat surprised that these gets slightly better mpg than my T680. I have a MX-13 rated at 455 hp and I average a little over 8 mpg.
What is your rear axle gear ratio? These new Cascadias have a gear ratio spec'd very high - 2.64 means low engine rpm's at highway speed.
The Detroit Trans also coast in neutral alot. Pretty sure paccars dont that.
Why 2:64 rears? What weights are you guys pulling, any mountains, running direct or indirect
They don't care, everything is about fuel
I'm starting 2 lean 2 freightliner?
Why did you choose battery pack apu over diesel fueled? I would prefer quieter sleep rather than truck idler is that apu noiserier?
EPU is quieter than a APU less maintenance too
The DD15 is a dog and gutless when pulling uphill. It may be able to get decent fuel economy for a 15 litre engine but boy the power band is awfully disappointing.
I do 45-55 maxed out weight depending on my entrance speed up 6% grades anything under 35k and the truck barely slows down so I’m happy DD15 550hp 2050ftlbs gen5 carb22 engine 2.85 rears 8.5-9.2mpg if the road is flat forget about it I can cruise at 72 and only spin 1200rpm he right a setup 2023 Cascadia is the best truck right now for OTR not even close.
@@Genkevintaylor21225 Depends on what model year DD15 (Uncle Truckus) probably is referring to the later DD15s with the twin scroll turbo and he is right that engine has a very narrow power curve 505 hp @ 1630 rpm and only has 350 hp @ 1900. Sounds like you have the older version DD15 with variable geometry turbo which has a wider power curve. To get what you have today you need to get the DD16 which has the wider power curve.
My DD15 pulls just as well as my C15 did. Your experience isn’t typical.
@@bertriedstra4 correct, I am taking about the 2023 DD15 because the subject of the video we are commenting on is the 2023 Freightliner Cascadia which features that specific engine. I have driven that truck with that engine extensively to include over challenging passes such as Monteagle with 80k gross and it was disappointing if not borderline dangerous at times due to the rate of how quickly it slows down and impedes traffic as a result.
It's the transmission, not the engine.
Ronen, do you see any extra expenses for maintenance and repair from a 23 cascadia to a 23 Volvo? People seem to talk about exhaust, egr, and electrical with the Volvos?
Just so you know it's difficult to see the data while on the phone
Not enough torque. 2.64 diffs I have in my 2004 Columbia
How much $ for this new truck ?
I have those photos of the electric freightliner but I did not receive an email address. If you would like those give me your email. Also I am driving a 2023 Kenworth t680 with an x15 Cummins engine. My mileage is as follows. At 67 mph I'm getting approximately 9.2 on flat. At 65 miles per hour I'm getting approximately 9.8 on flat. At 63 miles per hour I'm getting 10.2 to 10.4 on flat.
The lane assist sensor screams at me even when I have to use it, like warning people of my intent to merge lanes. The truck tries to do all the thinking for me for when to slow down for sadety, which sucks because the truck is a idiot and often makes the wrong calls. And as of right now. Me and my co-driver are sitting in a tow-truck getting a ride to the location that our truck with 10k miles on its is being towed to. This is the 5th truck of driving for more than a week since iv been driving. It the first truck with less than 300k that iv driven, and it is by far the worst truck iv ever driven and I thought this before it broke down.
Whats the performance difference of a battery pack ac unit and a tk auxiliary unit?
I get 12 hrs out of mine in eco mode and it’s cold as shit in my bunk and I was parked in the desert as long as u got good batteries and when u do have to replace em get the best u good when u have the epu in a new truck it’s mandatory that u get the upgraded insulation package from the factory they won’t let you order one and not the other and trust me it works it cut down on the noise from outside and vibration also the temperature is stable in the sleeper the divider curtains are thick as hell
The battery APU is much more reliable than the TriPac Diesel as well. Even when the batteries need to be replaced after a couple years, you can do that at any shop; no waiting for a Thermo King to have an open slot to work on the generator.
If the long hood truck is garbage.. put your plastic crap off road with more than
80 000 lbs... then we will see who got the garbage truck ...
I would like to know if you have run the numbers on the new Mack, with the MP8HE?
This truck work on diesel or gas ?
Gas. Good luck on your new career
I pay attention carefully when u speak ...
Micro management of your drivers. Slow acceleration, 64mph and reduced engine power? Can't get anywhere. Can lose 60-100 miles a day which means less home time and more hours working without being paid. Then company be asking why you late??
Is the transmission overdrive or direct?
With that axle ratio, I'm betting it's direct. Also better for fuel consumption (less/no gear-mesh losses at cruise compared with an overdrive box).
@@jonathanrabbitt it’s .78
"The best MPG may have a return on lower DPG"
MPG "Miles Per Gallon"
DPG "Dollars Per Gallon"
What's your DPG?
That would inform the rest of us of what your business model really is.
A company running a DPG of $15 - $20 versus a company with DPG $10- $15
would have a fuel cost 100% lower!
What's your overall overhead?
Do you need maximum MPG to support it on the backs of treating your drivers to cookie cutter trucks, freight & driving practices?
MPG must never be the only consideration at the cost of DPG
Companies running trucks that you criticize have this figured out.
Most loads don pay well enough to run hard and at the end of the day you'll will almost never see the day we get paid based on how many loads you ran in a month.. the numbers he focus on are obviously tailored to his operation, but the more efficient burnage of fuel is always top dog bro, no matter the pay per load
@@BiggDogg8993 Net profit is key and some drivers can get more done than others. Some of my lower MPG drivers bring home more net profit. So fuel is not always the only consideration. I will agree with you where cookie cutter fleets and freight are concerned it's what they focus on due to slim margins.
505 hp engine but only run 64 wow
Wow didnt know wander wow these truck pass me up going up hills with 505hp
They don't have the pulling rears
do u drive a truck
I would not drive for this guy. I understand why he is doing the things he’s doing, but governing a truck at 64 mph is just stupid. It becomes dangerous to not be able to keep up with the flow of traffic. I worked for a company that governed their trucks at 60 back in the 90’s. If you drive with the idea to turn the cruise off so someone can pass you, then you are not being as fuel efficient as you can be. Also, I guarantee you that I can get better fuel milage out of a vehicle with a manual transmission. You have to keep your foot out of it going through the gear box. It allows you to shift at the the most efficient rpm’s.
I agree then you’re left going 15 miles up a hill I know gearing and more plays a big part but when you detune a truck to go 65 I swear it Kills the truck power on hills
I hate the looks of them, they are grandpa trucks. they need to work on that.
Still the cascadia is a complete heap of junk. Who knows what else they cut corners to cheap out on quality. Especially after the covid shutdown on parts manufacturers. I have a 2019/20 and after 250k it rides like garbage from the cheap suspension and steering components, the copied airlines storage compartment struts have no gas left, constant acm codes, brake lights stick on, wiring harnesses chaff from all the shaking (they aren't modular harnesses, its one huge one throughout the frame), cab mounts worn out, the window switch broke. If all this happened to a 2020 model a 2023 will be 3x worse. The trucks are junk compared to the last gen 2017.
You have to replace the shocks every 50k miles or so.
😂😂facts. My brother work for your company Ronan I can tell you exactly what he's experiencing. He doesn't run mountains 99% Toronto down Indiana, midwest area and back to Calgary. Then Calgary south to midwest and back to Calgary or Toronto and such. Never pulled heavy weights running van. Mostly he told me 24000 lbs at the most so he's experience 8mpg with no head winds otherwise 6 or less with headwinds with 2020 cascadia. And he's being experience break down constantly with the truck three weeks in a row. My 2007 columbia gets 7.8mpg with egr module delete run same route as my brother run for your company Ronan. Not much to brag at least my truck doesn't break down like your new cascadia...and most importantly NO MONTHLY PAYMENTS. Try to actually compare apples to apples like running mountains then have the fuel economy then we'll see the real result. Otherwise is just false comparison. But watching your few video knowing you're only focus on fuel economy only and forget to mentioned any other cost is really not telling the whole entire story. Very biased 😂😂😂
😢