FUJIFILM 20-35mm For Landscapes

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2022
  • This week we test out the brand new fujifilm 20-35mm lens for landscape photography. We have been waiting for a wide angle lens for the Fujifilm GFX system for some time and now we finally have it with the 20-35mm.
    This lens will be a fantastic addition to the GFX medium format lineup of lenses and i look forward to including it in my kit. Out on field with this lens i try using it in open landscape where the 20-35mm focal range really makes all the difference to the field of view we can now capture with medium format.
    Fujifilm UK: eshop.fujifilm-x.com/uk
    Campervan Hire: www.paulthomsonphotography.co...
    Workshops: www.paulthomsonphotography.co...
    Website Below
    www.paulthomsonphotography.co.uk
    These are all of my affiliate links to the gear i use and recommend if you use these links to purchase gear then i will receive a small commission at no extra cost to you.
    Squarespace : squarespace.syuh.net/paulthom...
    Kase Filters Affiliate Link: kasefilters.com/ref/pthomson/
    f stop gear: shop.fstopgear.com/?rfsn=6471...
    Topaz Labs Plugins: topazlabs.com/ref/1281/
    Sunway Foto: sunwayfoto-store.com/?ref=pau...
    Landscape Photography Vlogcast:
    podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Nature First: www.naturefirstphotography.org/​
    Check out Gavin Hardcastle courses below:
    www.fototripper.com/store/pho...
    www.fototripper.com/store/com...
    www.fototripper.com/store/com...
    Support The Channel By Buying Me A Coffee At The Link Below
    ko-fi.com/paulthomsonphotography
    Want to learn more about RUclips?
    Check out Gregg Snells course Affiliate Link below
    greg-snell.teachable.com/?aff...
    Amazon Affiliate Links for my Gear below:
    Sony ZV-1: amzn.to/2XGLulk
    Sony A7Rii: amzn.to/3dqiSCm
    Sony 16-35 F4 Zeiss Lens: amzn.to/2SRTLAv
    Sony 70-200 F4: amzn.to/2YO9ncf
    Sony 28-70 mm: amzn.to/2SQ4Lyw
    DJI Mavic Air 2: amzn.to/3iqMimG
    DJI Osmo Pocket: amzn.to/2WLJVRS
    Canon M50: amzn.to/2SRKgkX
    Rode Wireless Go: amzn.to/2SRKkkH
    Rode Video Micro: amzn.to/3ckTqht
    Rode NT-USB: amzn.to/35Xn1LP
    Epidemic Music Affiliate Link: www.epidemicsound.com/referra...
    ‘Music by Epidemic Sound (www.epidemicsound.com)’
    #Landscapephotography #fujifilm #photography #landscape

Комментарии • 97

  • @johnwest6806
    @johnwest6806 2 месяца назад +2

    Great video. The beautiful landscapes in your video further inspire me. I can't wait to finally purchase the GFX 100 II along with the 20-35 mm lens.

  • @tomheim9516
    @tomheim9516 Год назад +6

    1:05 to 1:26 is phenomenal! Pure art!

  • @LuigiNespeca
    @LuigiNespeca Год назад +2

    What an epic scenario Paul, great images you've taken!

  • @vedarius
    @vedarius Год назад +4

    Thanks a lot for this review Paul! I was sure that Fujifilm was going to make another great piece of optical engineering. Your review just reconfirms that Fuji does state-of-art job when it comes to optics. As for your shots, I can but join the best comments in this stack. I loved your framing! Nothing superfluous in the the frame and nothing missing too! The work of an artist with a fine sense for everything that turns tech work into a piece of art! My thanks and congratulations!

  • @thecotswoldphotographer
    @thecotswoldphotographer 2 месяца назад +1

    Nice video. I’ve got this lens waiting for me back in the UK. Looking forward to using it once I’m back.

  • @alexvanderpol
    @alexvanderpol Год назад +4

    That was great! The best review is showing images like that - and they are exactly what I hoped for. Thanks a lot Paul 😁 What a beautiful area with the heather, by the way...

  • @sdhute
    @sdhute Год назад +2

    Nice too see more gf lenses being released. This would be my natural choice for my first lens. I’m surprised there is not more glass on that lens

  • @aureliomarsili3902
    @aureliomarsili3902 Год назад +2

    Really beautiful colors, and very very sharp images ... thanks !!!

  • @larrysalaets7088
    @larrysalaets7088 Год назад +2

    Definitely seems worthy of a spot in your bag! Great images, Paul!

  • @black-and-light
    @black-and-light Год назад +2

    1:13 OMG!!! Thanks for the video

  • @geoffhirst5338
    @geoffhirst5338 11 месяцев назад +2

    Great images chap. The cloud action is superb. Really enjoyed this video even though i dont have Fuji kit. Nice one.

  • @DennisBater
    @DennisBater 4 месяца назад +1

    Great video Paul, I have the 20-35, 45-100, and the 100-200 which seems to cover the landscape as I see it and works well for me. I use both the 20-35 and the 45-100 about the same amount...

  • @juanitakelly3082
    @juanitakelly3082 Год назад +2

    Gorgeous images with great explanation.

  • @tompetersphotography
    @tompetersphotography Год назад +1

    Great little vlog fella! Really like that longer exposure utilising them clouds moving

  • @andrewherbert9938
    @andrewherbert9938 Год назад +2

    Nice video Paul , looks like a great lens for the gfx , all nice shots but especially that last pano

  • @marshalljvanderhoofphoto
    @marshalljvanderhoofphoto Год назад +2

    Thank you for the images. The 20-35mm is super interesting, and I'm guessing it will be in my bag soon seeing images like that.

  • @stevenbishop5633
    @stevenbishop5633 Год назад +2

    I really liked the 20mm shot of the two shot composite including the clouds streaking, bright center and foreground rocks along with the wall. Very dramatic I thought.

  • @BenjaminKanarek
    @BenjaminKanarek Год назад +1

    Thanks for this. I see you used a 16:9 crop factor on the wall image. Is that correct?

  • @IanSmithFotografi
    @IanSmithFotografi Год назад +2

    Excellent video comparing the 2 wide angle choices.

  • @cmolina31
    @cmolina31 Год назад +2

    Excellent video. Thank you,

  • @davidskinner274
    @davidskinner274 Год назад +2

    Hi, Paul. I like the second image better with the forrground rocks. To get this perspective is why I like my 17-70 so much on my Sony ff. Cheers mate

  • @whitefootimages
    @whitefootimages Год назад +1

    Great review - mines been on back order for 2 weeks at WIX

  • @westside74301
    @westside74301 Год назад +1

    Terrific video, Paul. Like your vibe and approach. Just subscribed. Unlike many videos, felt like I was behind the camera - thus, I learned. Also love the beautiful music. Can you tell us what the pieces are? Thanks!

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад

      Thanks Jeffrey will have to go back and have a look as I get all my music from epedemic sound 😁✌️

  • @elusivelens1744
    @elusivelens1744 Год назад +1

    Very nice view at 9:30.

  • @EricGebhard
    @EricGebhard Год назад +2

    Thank you for the video. Looks like a nice lens. Already preordered one. Looks like I'll be selling the 23mm.

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад +2

      Thanks man yeah definitely not worth keeping as this will do everything you need 😀✌️

  • @IzzyAbuleelaPhotography
    @IzzyAbuleelaPhotography Год назад +3

    Been waiting to see this out in the wild and you did an excellent job showcasing it Paul. I use Laowa's 17mm for ultra wide at the moment but that has some quirks you need to work around. A question if I may, how is it in terms of sharpness compared to the 23, especially in the corners?

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад +2

      Thanks Izzy as far as I could tell on my images it was sharp corner to corner no issues that I can see 😀👍

  • @ivanstevens
    @ivanstevens Год назад +2

    Great images Paul. I would love to use the GFX range and this new lens looks pretty awesome but is somewhat out of my price bracket unfortunately.

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад +1

      Yes Ivan it’s definitely somewhat of an investment for sure and will be a good while before I can afford to add it to my kit 😊✌️

  • @user-em1dj8fn7m
    @user-em1dj8fn7m Год назад +1

    Excellent video and beautiful shots. Thank you, I plan on getting the 20-35!
    Is the shot at 12:50 a pano stitch?

  • @murraykeithhayes4046
    @murraykeithhayes4046 Год назад +2

    Thanks for the video, looks great. And where did you get that eye piece?

  • @jdh_images
    @jdh_images Год назад +2

    Great review - can’t wait to get my hands on a copy - can I please ask what L bracket you have, finding it tricky to get a decent one, thanks.

  • @brianbeattyphotography
    @brianbeattyphotography Год назад +1

    looks like a beautiful lens! The only thing holding me back from jumping to a GFX is the inability to cover the 11-16mm side and 150 - 400mm telephoto options that I can currently get on the 5DSR. I shoot so much at 300mm+ that I'm really concerned I'd miss those focal lengths. Great review and beautiful pano of the mountains!

    • @bobby350z
      @bobby350z Год назад

      250mm with 1.4xTC gets you to 300mm FF. And you have enough MPs to crop. Super wide side, probably will never happen.

    • @user-yp6in8nl9z
      @user-yp6in8nl9z 8 месяцев назад

      you can take two shots and stitch them together with a single click. what you said makes no sense.

    • @brianbeattyphotography
      @brianbeattyphotography 8 месяцев назад

      @@user-yp6in8nl9z try that at the ocean with waves... good luck keeping that to a single click. And, still no option of 150mm plus natively. I even picked up a GFX though, so just living with the limitations

  • @jhin5244
    @jhin5244 Месяц назад +1

    Great review, great landscapes! What is your technique to avoid the need of focus bracketing? (some other photographers make the case that because of the narrow depth of field, focus bracketing is necessary in medium format landscape photography)

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Месяц назад +1

      Thanks so much to be honest I don’t have any more depth of field issues than I had on full frame. On medium format I find as long as you stop down your aperture to f16 instead of around f11 on full frame it is always about where it should be. As with any photography this depends on how close you are to the imediate foreground.
      Cheers
      Paul

    • @jhin5244
      @jhin5244 Месяц назад +1

      @@PaulthomsonphotographyUk Paul, thanks for sharing. Good to hear that f16 does the job. Encouraged by your experience i am considering getting the 20-35mm. Cheers, John

  • @bshe23
    @bshe23 Год назад +2

    really nice picture´s !! ;-)

  • @grosema
    @grosema Год назад +1

    I knew I should have waited for the 20-35mm... O well the 23mm is going to have to do, I just bought the Sigma 85 Art lens Nikon F mount and its killer on the GFX with the Steelsring NK/GFX II Adapter

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад +1

      For sure I think there are going to be a lot of 23mm lenses available soon . As long as you have the ranges you need that’s all that matters. Cheers George 😊✌️

  • @DennisBater
    @DennisBater 4 месяца назад +1

    Paul, what Fuji lens do you use the most for your landscape?

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  4 месяца назад +1

      Hi Dennis probably the 35-70mm followed by the 100-200mm

    • @DennisBater
      @DennisBater 4 месяца назад +1

      Thanks Paul@@PaulthomsonphotographyUk

  • @dbartos4948
    @dbartos4948 Год назад +1

    You have 82mm Kase filter on this GF 20-35 lens. Is there any vignetting on 20mm, when you use ND filter or 2 filters together /ND + polarising filters/?
    When lens has 82 filter size people usually use one step bigger filters, in this case 95mm filters beacause of vignetting...

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад

      Hi no it’s one of the things I tested straight away and could not see any vignetting using my filters 😁👍

    • @dbartos4948
      @dbartos4948 Год назад +1

      @@PaulthomsonphotographyUk nice to listen :) even if you use 2 filters together?

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад

      @@dbartos4948 Now I didn’t try that to be honest while I had it . 👍

  • @hubertcole1645
    @hubertcole1645 Год назад +1

    What gfx camera you using?

  • @peribe438
    @peribe438 Год назад +3

    f/4 is not or ever eq to a 2,8 full-frame! Eq to ca 3,2 in depth of field but f/4 is f/4 in terms of light.

    • @mortenthorpe
      @mortenthorpe 2 месяца назад

      Absolutely! I get tired, when photographers are accomplished enough to get serious and buy into GFX, or other really expensive systems, and then they get the basics wrong! Focal length is focal length, aperture is aperture, regardless of crop factor. Crop factor affects the field-of-view, nothing else!

  • @astrostl
    @astrostl Год назад

    f/4 in full-frame terms for the GFX 100S would be 4 * 0.79 == 3.16 or roughly f/3.2, not f/2.8. Nice vid!

    • @bobby350z
      @bobby350z Год назад

      There is 4:3 vs 3:2 factor too.

  • @antonroux6737
    @antonroux6737 Год назад +1

    Have you used the GF 23mm?

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад +1

      Yes I have 👍

    • @antonroux3564
      @antonroux3564 Год назад +2

      ​@@PaulthomsonphotographyUk can you do a review that compares the two? Is there still any optical, image quality and rendering justification for the GF 23mm over the GF 20-35mm? The MTF charts of the zoom counterintuitively seem superior to the prime but they don't pick up things like distortion and a range of other parameters. Practically, although I may be okay with images at 20mm outside of the optimum optical range of the zoom, if I have to zoom into 23mm anyway to pick up the best image quality then perhaps I would be better off getting the prime if the prime is still superior compared to the zoom at 23mm? My interest is ultimate image quality and it is not clear to me that GF 23mm has that anymore. Thoughts?

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад +2

      @@antonroux3564 I could possibly do that when I eventually get hold of the lens for myself although my thoughts are the prime will always have a slight edge when it comes to image quality as there are less things to get in the way internally . However I think it would be really hard to tell unless you were pixel peeping. For me the 20-35 is way more useful as it gives me a bigger focal range to work with. 👍✌️

    • @antonroux6737
      @antonroux6737 Год назад +2

      @@PaulthomsonphotographyUk thanks for your thoughts. I'm not so much into "pixel peeping" but it sounds like I should wait for further critiques down the track

  • @whitefootimages
    @whitefootimages Год назад +2

    Did well to fly the drone between the tree trunks

  • @MatthewUseda
    @MatthewUseda Год назад

    It's actually not F2.8. If you use the ratio of .79 to convert its actually 3.16, or round up F3.2...

  • @RobertTeague
    @RobertTeague Год назад +1

    Naturally, I bought the 23mm f4 a few months ago .....

  • @Luigi13
    @Luigi13 Год назад +1

    Excellent shots?

  • @eprohoda
    @eprohoda Год назад +1

    dude~unnusual ~have a good day- 📢

  • @angelisone
    @angelisone Год назад

    Your typical dated slow lenses @F4.0. Where is F2.0 or F2.8?. Beside all that said. No landscape shooters need AF on wide lenses.
    ATG & I say total failure because it doesn't have ATG's Focus scale in feet/meters, no focus index nor DOF scales.
    FIY:
    one can focus faster with dated/dead Hasselblad 500C/M's lenses because those important information are missing on many of today lenses that companies are selling to the beginners, weekends & amateur markets.
    ATG & I say, One does not need AF on wide angle lenses.

  • @harveymanfrantinsingin7373
    @harveymanfrantinsingin7373 Год назад +1

    So I’m not seeing a whole lot of distortion. Are you correcting or is it rather distortion free? This lens has me very interested in the GFX line.

    • @PaulthomsonphotographyUk
      @PaulthomsonphotographyUk  Год назад

      I have to say I didn’t notice any huge distortion at all with this lens really very good 😁✌️

    • @harveymanfrantinsingin7373
      @harveymanfrantinsingin7373 Год назад +1

      @@PaulthomsonphotographyUk that’s incredible! Looks like a very promising combo that would be upgrade proof for a god handful of years to come. Thanks for the reply.