Great vid, thanks for doing this Dr. Raszek! 00:00 Latest UK data 00:22 Surprise: Vaccinated MORE infected than unvaccinated. Or is it? Let's see. 00:42 COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 41 01:00 **98% of population has antibodies w/19.7% from Infection 01:23 1st published instance of HERD IMMUNITY? 01:50 TABLE 1: Summary of vaccine effectiveness (outcomes Delta) 02:00 low confidence for this table though. Maybe misleading 02:55 FIGURE 1: data showing ages and vaccination Dose 1 03:51 FIGURE 2: data showing ages and vaccination Dose 2 04:37 TABLE 2: Covid cases by Vaccination status week 37-40 05:13 Most interesting data in last two columns. 05:49 if >30 vaccinated more frequently infected 06:15 the first time seeing data breakdown like this is fantastic 06:23 TABLE 3: Hospitalizations in the UK 06:42 Vaccinated LESS LIKELY to be hospitalized though. 06:52 TABLE 4: Deaths and vaccination status 07:11 Extremely low values for
Interesting data assuming it's accurate. Agree, it would be interesting to see the data from countries that Pfiser and other mRNA vaccines. From all that I have read this is the real danger period for medium term effects of these vaccines. Need a lot more research in to breakthrough infections caused by mutations, rate of mutations, evolving variants and immune responses to those changes in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated/natural immunity. Was informative thanks
It is my choice to decide what goes into my body! No government authority has the right over my freedom of choice. I prefer natural immunity and allowing my innate, adaptive and interferon system perform it's protection.
So long as if you are unfortunate to require hospitalisation, you stoically and bravely refuse treatment? Beds around the world are full of unvacinated ppl like yourself
@@naz0079 It's easy to blinker yourself into only reading and listening to certain sources of info to validate an option Naz. I have to watch myself on this also, as before you know it you're in an echo chamber getting your own biases re-enforced. You are correct btw. The vaccine won't stop you getting Covid and nor will it stop you spreading it. That was never the intention of it. The whole point is to reduce hospitalisation. Simple case. Case in hand. I'm 47 and had both shots (UK btw) My wife and Daughter got the "C" (both jabbed) and had to isolate. 6 days later I caught it. So did the wife's parents who're mid 70's. 1 with chronic asthma and 1 with a heart condition. Pre vaccine I'm certain at least one of them would have died. Lucky they been wise enough to accept the jabs, and after 2 weeks of feeling like crap and home made a full recovery. As to vaccinated ppl spreading it? Of course as more ppl are vaccinated than not, it's simple maths Naz?! Despite being stuck in a house with 2 x covid infected ppl, I was a while getting it, and even then none of the home testing showed I was positive, and it took 2 lab tests to get the positive result. 4 days after it was confirmed I lost taste and smell. Other than feeling under the weather, if I'd not suspected due to being with covid positive family, I'd have been out and about and just assuming it was a common cold. I isolated and was able to carry on working from home. It wiped out the wife (men are used to man-flu lol!) but 6 weeks later still not fully regained taste 'n smell.
@@naz0079 6:42 and 11:20 in the vid. Less hospital for those vaccinated and a reminder that the jab is to reduce symptoms to make you immune and won't stop you spreading it. Watch the vid properly. And go get the vaccine eh?
At 11:00 Dr. Raszek said (paraphrasing), "These vaccines were approved for protecting you from severe disease outcomes - none of them were ever approved for stopping infections." This begs the question - why vaccinate children? They have no fear of severe outcomes and the fact that they're vaccinated won't help curb infections to older (more at risk) people.
@Stephen H. Li there is a need to shift from a public health approach ( vaccinate everyone ) to an individual protection case. UK had sunk all it,s hope,s in the vaccine doing the job of stopping the infection, without ( or regardless ) of the actual data. And must remember no scientists in cabinet. Had lost the battle on testing, so vaccines had to be the saviour! From what I recall, Pfizer had not done PCR on the infected post vaccination( plus that lost data ) so it was all an ‘extrapolated’ wish. AZ had done PCR on post vaccinated infected ( v small numbers ). Need to read the paper again. 6% of those studied were >65yrs.
Confidence in any medical body that doesn't acknowledge or recognise other medical experts in the field . Based merely on prejudice or the fact that they don't go along with a dogmatic established view, Should in the name of science be rejected.
social experiment; look at austria right now; no waxx, no rights at all. you bow down, you're god to go. you refuse to play their game; work, quick stop at local grocery to get cheap junk food and back home. day after day after day...
The deaths from covid in the vaccinated and the deaths from covid in the unvaccinated per 100,000 is only half the story, To be able to evaluate the vaccine you also need the deaths per 100,000 from ALL CAUSES in the vaxxed and the unvaxxed.
Here is a nice video discussing all-cause mortality and its relation to this same UK data: ruclips.net/video/LBDd0yH8OuI/видео.html&ab_channel=ThinkingSlow
The whole thing has been a scam. How so many took these vaccines amazes me and big pharma. Every one has to pay for them not just the vaxxed. They refused to let doctors treat and get it under control. Their excuses are disingenuous as to why they want everyone jabbed, including the children. I wonder what is going to happen to all those vaccinated not the unvaccinated.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
In the UK, 'Fully vaccinated' means vaccinated with a MHRA recognised vaccine in line with the MHRA recommended number of doses for the vaccine used and TWO WEEKS has passed for the vaccine to take effect. So anyone suffering an injury after taking the vaxx, is considered 'unvaccinated' until the 15th day AFTER the second dose. This needs to be CLEARLY STATED in ALL studies involving the COVID 'vaccines'.
@@574130 - It appears in the NHS documents 'When to self-isolate and what to do' and 'Approved COVID-19 vaccines and countries and territories with approved proof of vaccination'. Also stated in the Scottish 'Coronavirus (COVID-19): vaccine certification scheme'. I have not seen it stated on any comparative studies so far.
@Jay Jay plays a part in the adverse reactions side of things though... many do not get recorded and are brushed aside by Drs (threat of termination if caught spreading hesitancy, etc. - even going so far as to recommend 2nd doses to those who have suffered anaphylaxis from the 1st)
You're a special one. This isn't how they classify adverse reactions, only with respect to being full immunized/ protected. If you react after having the vaccine they still log it dummy.
Of corse it does, if I didn’t have it I would have died hahahaha. These are the kind of divs I’m surrounded by. The fact they had covid before the vaccine and had zero to moderate symptoms. Then contracted covid after the vaccinations and were really ill and still not right, given up exercise or work in some cases.
@@timmysawdust193 Haha ‘Divs’ love that word, haven’t heard it in ages. Listen to this for the div mentality. In April a friend (aged 49) couldn’t wait to get the jibby. I suggested maybe he should wait because it was unlikely he’d die if he got cov1d. He said he didn’t want to get covid & that’s why he was getting the jibby. 3 months later after being double jibbied he got cov1d. This week he said he knew back in April that you could still get covid even if vaccinated. Yet back in April his whole reason for getting jibbied was because he didn’t want to get cov1d. 😂😂😂😂 These people are completely in denial of their own stupidity. Either that or they know they’ve been a div & just don’t want to look stupid.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
Which part is low-confidence exactly? Looking at the data, the "unlinked" meaning "unverifiable" portion of that data is only about 5~10%. So 90~% confidence? That might not be good enough for real scientists and medical regulators. However, most anti-vaxxer hedge their bets entirely on unverified stuff and blind-faith with numbers that they pull from a hat. So I'd say the confidence level of this study is pretty high in comparison. lol
Alex Frank Watching the video would answer your question. In the table referenced only two entries are of high confidence. Footnotes add further doubts over the data. There seems to be an intent to present a best scenario but this has been impossible.
Simple numbers like counting cases and comparing per vax status are trustworthy. Confidence levels are needed when it gets more complicated like estimating vaccine efficacy (like those figures labelled low confidence in the beginning of the vid did)
It was found here in the US that if an unvaccinated person went to the hospital for another medical issue (morbidity is what they are calling it), but you ended up testing "positive" through the false-positive producing PCR (non)test, you were counted as an unvaccinated hospitalized case count. The CDC has already issued guidance on how to test vaccinated and unvaccinated to ensure clinics are registering a higher amount of unvaccinated positives than vaccinated positives.
It's been that way from the beginning. I know of a few people who were in auto, motorcycle wrecks....taken to hospital.....they were tallied up as covid deaths.
Exactly. It was over 50% of "c0vid infections" too. So over half weren't hospitalised for cv. They went in with a broken leg ect tested positive and got included in the figures lol OVER 50%
@@americansfirst1095 I know someone who died of cancer and they had covid on thier death cert. I also know someone who died of stabbing and they got labeled the same. The Fraud is unreal.
Covid nurse here, med Tele unit. Our inpatients (non vent unit) have tended to be fully vaccinated. Up to 70%, on a given day. Some vaccinated have to go to the ICU to be vented.
@@1907jdee Good question. I've heard early intervention is key. Perhaps those who are vaccinated are waiting longer for help hence the reason they end up in the hospital.
UK NURSE? those numbers would reflect the population rates of vaxxed and non vaccinated. So it’s not an unusual number if you believe as I do that the vaccines do not really prevent serious sickness for very long and have no protection against infection.
im against vaccine mandate and i appreciate the video im glad vaccine work for people that need it. im against forcing super healthy people like me to take it, especially when we are already 80%+ vaxed
@@superchuck3259 like i said, im no one to tell if you should take a vaccine or not. It is your own choice and has to be. Yes i think this vaccine is rushed and that one of the reason i dont want it beside the fact that covid is very benin for my age group
Sure, but my son is an ICU doc and he's receiving more and more young super healthy people like you, in their late 20s and 30s arriving for treatment. All are unvaxxed and all desperately ill. Two died last week (damaged lungs and unable to ventilate). The family (all unvaxxed) of one of them begged the medics to give their son the vax and did not understand when told that it was too late to vaccinate once Covid had taken hold.
@@kevinsyd2012 Is he saving their lives anyways? I heard threats that unvaccinated were just being left to die with rational it is their fault for not getting vaccinated.
Yeah and I'm sure you're feeling isn't influenced by politics. Funny how all the dead and in ICU are Trump supporters who are un-vacinated. I would much rather have a mild Covid infection and be vaccinated than be un-vacinated and be dead or get long haul Covid. Nice avatar.
The only places in the US that are barring the unvaxed are some major, liberal cities like LA and NYC. In the vast majority of the US, it's life as normal.
The number of infections among vaccinated and unvaccinated actually follows the real life ratio of vaccination. If you check the CORRELATION, you will see, that it is almost ZERO. Conclusion: the vaccines reduces the symptoms, but has literally ZERO effect on becoming infected.
@@pipedreamer2u You will also notice that cities in the North are more segregated than in the South. Not saying that the South is devoid of ignorant racists, but just saying that there is more racism in the BLM loving blue states than is let on.
I have a grave concern about this. If lets say, according to this data, that the vaccinated have a slightly higher chance of getting infected for whatever reason, And if what I heard about the vaccines potentially causing the body to have less varying ways to protect against it is true, then there is a huge problem here. Because we know now that the vaccines effectiveness wares off in months time, id assume your death and hospitalization protects also wears off too, but you are still with the heightened risk of catching covid again. Meaning you would be theoretically be at a higher risk of death and hospitalizations later on once the vaccines effectiveness wares off. Which then would force people to get shots or booster shots very often, like once every 6 months or so, just to stay protected, because their bodies are also not as equipped anymore to fight it off naturally by itself anymore. like weird cycle that gets you trapped into taking the shots forever.
@@eyemnew2991 yes sorry. Sometimes my english is not that great so I may have explained in weird way. if it is not understood what I was trying to say, then thats ok. Thank you.
Thank you for doing this Doc. At around 10:00 on your possible conclusions about why the unvaccinated are affected less than the vaccinated, I would like to assist with info as I live in the UK and inform you and your audience that since the beginning of summer 2021 everywhere is open for both vaccinated and unvaccinated without the need of wearing masks except in public busses and the tube and also without the need to show any type of test results or proof of vaccination. So the possibility that the numbers are lower due to the difficulty or prohibition of unvaccinated people to go somewhere can be ruled out. All the best and please keep doing your research, we need people like you more than any other time. Thank you.
@@noseahead Yeah, unfortunately this is another situation where it is clear as day that the jab is not helping with the spread, but still many governments are pushing it as the only solution due to contracts with big pharma.
Make sure that you take your 5 year old in to get the jab. In a few months it will probably be required all the way to newborns. Gotta get them jabbed too. Forget about all of the side effects and deaths from it. Just do as you are told.
ADE is checked for in clinical trials, and so far none. It would present as more severe disease, but vaccinated have less severe disease. The ZOE Covid study shows they have less symptoms for shorter duration.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
Yes!!! We just injected this junk into our best and brightest that care for us!!!! We must keep them healthy!!!! The Who already killed how many? It air born my you know what!
You do realize that clotting is part of the covid disease but so much worse as to cause death. Clot issues are not unique to the vaccine. Given that AZ vax is adenovirus, consider that a recipient who experiences clots would certainly have clots from actual disease. It’s foolish to blame a vaccine for less severe side effects that are experienced in the wild and variant virus.
This feels a throwback from wanting to protect the old by immunising the young as well...but they must see that is no longer the case. This is the bit that feels wrong to me. It seems uneccessary at the moment. Over 50's probably need all jabs including a booster but under 50 just don't seem to.
@@thebrowns5337 try looking into Andrew Read from Penn State University. Mankind is heading the wrong way with these Vaccines! Only time will tell, when the hospitals are only filled with Vaccinated patients!!!
We need more people making videos like you do about vaccines. Very refreshing seeing a more critical point of view. I read some of articles and I questioned few things and you answer/question same points as well.
Is there an ingredient list? Pharmacists don't have a clue and if your on medication and nobody can figure out adverse reactions to current medications...thank you
You can look up the monograph for each vaccine online. Ingredients are listed in the monograph. Additionally, the person administering the vaccine should be able to provide a copy of the monograph/vaccine components upon request. If they refuse to provide this, they’re not doing their job and you should probably go elsewhere. Medication interactions aren’t usually an issue with vaccines; allergies to components are a bigger concern.
Alien Lizard Queen The monographs differ from country to country. They do present a full ingredient list. I’m afraid conspiracy theorists have created dubious assertions about certain ingredients and their origins.
@@alienlizardqueen8748 I watched some American on YT yesterday go to a pharmacy and ask for a list of ingredients for the Moderna vaccine. There was none available, no info leaflet in the pack, nothing online even. He was advised by the chemist to conatct Moderna directly.
I was following just Dr John Campbell, but am now also following you. Your doing a great job of presenting Scientific facts and explaining them. Thankyou for your videos!
You bowed to your king, you bowed to your boss, you went along with their lies so your life stays comfortable, you knew in your gut none of this was on accident, you refused to listen to the warnings of the ones that had nothing to gain but only criticism, and now you're going to take more, more, and more. You get what you deserve.
The problem with this analysis is that it does not represent the 3 district groups: Vaccinated, Not-vaccinated with previous Covid, Not vaccinated without previous Covid.. Many of these studies combines those with natural immunity with those with no immunity, causing misleading results. I would speculate that those non-vaccinated that were hospitalized did not have previous exposure. It should not be that difficult to break these results into the 3 distinct groups.
What amazes me is the lack of critical thinking of most of the researchers in the medical field. Like you, it is very apparent to me that we have to dig deeper to get any meaningful results. We also have huge attitude and lifestyle difference from vaxed and non-vaxed. What about tobacco use (nicotine to be precise). Studies showed nicotine helped keep Covid at bay. What about general health conditions like weight?
For three years now this has been going on. COVID and the vaccines should be given an award for best outstanding achievements of designer outdoor wear.
I would agree, but the thing is anti body tests are not being performed in many countries, at least not for free, to further push the "vaccine" narrative. so such a data set is not available.
Thanks for this presentation. I would love to see the whole data set gathered by PHE. Not just the cherry picked snippets to support the policy. I would suggest that antibody studies in donated blood should be reviewed on the basis of occupation of those blood donors as I believe it may slant towards occupations with higher vaccine compliance and virus exposure .than the general population.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
See comment above on ONS data sets. Front line workers pre vaccines arguably had highest exposure.. The vaccinated may have initially been in safer working environments & home working. Time lines would be significant . UK data also segmented across different socio economic grps.
Lol, Covid19 is theoretical and the PCR test used for diagnosing cases is not a valid test for viruses! (Start with Dr Sam Baily, Kary Mullis, and go from there although it pretty much ends with them) Its a very high probability that those with actual symptoms and have died have or had influenza!!
@@jimeagle1952 I assume you,re not working in intensive medicine nor have seen the disease upfront. Not sure how much Sam Bailey has seen in NZ when she was making all those pronouncements last yr. Agreed, the PCR test is a poor way to detect infectious so they can isolate. So much discussion now on testing. See Carl Henegan. But SARS2 is real and the disease is real for those with severe illness. But risk is skewed. See Spiegelhalter. But don,t spread non - science.
I read this report about a week ago and was initially shocked; then I thought about it and what occurred to me is this. Regarding the rates per 100,000 infection among vaxxed/unvaxxed - wouldn't this be about what we should expect to see for a vaccine that doesn't prevent infection (without it needing to be due to antibody dependent enhancement?) Perhaps I'm wrong, but my thinking is... if you take a random sample of 100,000 people from the adult UK population, something like 85% would be vaccinated and 15% not. So, the probability that an infected person is also vaccinated is high - much higher than the probability that the person will be unvaccinated (the same rationale given for why there are high rates of infection amongst unvaccinated children and young people). So, is this just a statistical anomaly? Another factor could be the high rates of natural immunity here which might turn out to offer better protection against reinfection (though I'm not sure where the research stands on this at the moment). In terms of unvaccinated people having less contact, I would say that's unlikely. I've recently moved from Canada to the UK (to avoid the mandates and vax passes) and society is, at the moment, very open here to all. No restrictions. What do you think? Is that reasoning sound?
Yes, I forget what the statisticians name is the fact checks things, but he essentially said the same thing. The sheer number of vaccinated people vs the small number of unvaccinated with the fact that vaccines don't actually prevent infection or spread (they might hamper it slightly but not much at all from what I understand, although they do reduce serious health impacts) means tne figures will show many vaccinated folk, more so than unvaccinated as being infected. Thjs is a positive really as it means those people who have antibodies from the vaccines then get to safely top up/refresh their antibodies following infection. They should be set then. Unless the virus mutates in a spectacular fashion. Even then they'll likely be better protected than the unvaxxed. And as for the folk that say people got ill after the vaccine, including dying. Well yes. Normal life and all other infections and accidents and health issues due to lifestyle will continue so peoplethat have been jabbed will still get ill and some may die. Linking it to the jab is daft. The fact most of these people will have been eating processed food, drinking alcohol, smoking kr just breathing our polluted air (which can be attributed forhelping along 20% of deaths these days)...the vaccine can't help these people apart from to stop them getting seriously ill from Covid19.
@@thebrowns5337 nope, it’s per ratio, or percentage of that individual group, so more vaxxed people are catching Covid as a percentage of those vaxxed.
Could it be that lots of the remaining unvaccinated are just very healthy people? And they don't want unknown chemicals in their bodies? So they would be the ones eating very healthy, exercising daily, have low BMI + good muscle mass (athletes), have high HRV score, they normally dont catch colds or flu because of their diet & lifestyle. And when they do go somewhere its to some outside activity like hiking or the beach, etc. Maybe they are not the ones sitting in a crowded theater eating popcorn & candy & drinking soda. Because they never ever touch that stuff. They are the ones doing keto and/or carnivore. I would like to see the HRV scores of the fully vaccinated who got sick. What is their BMI? What is their diet? Do they have metabolic disease? How much exercise do they get a day? Are they able to do a half marathon walking or do they think walking 1 block is a huge distance? What is the body fat percentage? I have also read that having allergies is actually protective against the virus. It could be that when you have allergies they make your innate immune system stronger? More "trigger happy" so it's always on guard? I would think that many people who have strong allergies to various things would be very hesitant to get the vaccine because the likely hood of a bad reaction goes up. And what if you combine healthy diet & lifestyle with the allergies? That is the situation I am in. I can't even be around a simple air freshener as my face swells up & gets all red with burning throat. React to lots of common things. But my HRV is generally in the 70s & 80s. And next month I will be 50. 0 meds. My blood pressure at the doc was 106/62. So I would like to see the actual stats on these vaccinated people.
7:04 in the high risk ages 50+, i do find it curious that the deaths recorded in the unvaccinated all center around 108 plus/minus 8 with a bump to 161 in the highest risk 80+ age group, but in the vaccinated the number of deaths essentially doubles or worse for each age group. i would anticipate there might have been more correlation there?
The number of infections among vaccinated and unvaccinated actually follows the real life ratio of vaccination. If you check the CORRELATION, you will see, that it is almost ZERO. Conclusion: the vaccines reduces the symptoms, but has literally ZERO effect on becoming infected.
Well, it's a mixed bag if we look at it unbiased. On one hand, those who took the jab are protected from the more severe effects of the disease, especially the elderly. On the other hand, in the general populous it has actually increased infection rates. But this has also given the authoritarian media and politicians to push lockdowns further and longer as they only focus on infection rates, not mortalities. Which, like you said, might mean the jab is doing exactly what it was supposed to... to spread a low impact disease as far and wide as possible to justify the pharma product and political tyranny...
@@Keys879 The lockdowns are economic warfare like embargos. Countries that can't leave and trade have financial issues. This whole thing stinks, it is either evil or being used for evil purposes.
@@Keys879 I agree with your first point - the vaccines protect the vulnerable. I can't fully agree with the rest. The reason we see more vaccinated folk infected is simply because there are more vaccinated than unvaccinated. There will be additional reasons too - the vaccinated may feel protected and let their guard down, those exposed to far higher risk of catching the virus in their job (teachers, doctors, nurses etc. will be vacvinated (it can't stop you getting it, it just helps you fight it off better) and early doors - their antibodies may be waning now. It's easy to lookfor and think you have found evil but yoj need to keep an open mind and review all evidence without bias.
@@thebrowns5337 As per he UK data in this video, there are only ~130 deaths in 1,000,000 for the most critical age group (70-80). That is paltry. Almost nothing. We destroyed global economies, stripped rights, divided the populations, encouraged tyrannical behavior, and attempted to enforce an experimental treatment that previously failed its clinical trials over the past ten years. Who's own manufacturers aren't held liable for any damages to those who take it and who also won't release collected data on side-effects for their products. Covered for by a media that largely misrepresents and hides information to maintain the status quo narrative. Cases do not equal deaths. How many people do you know who've died? Don't answer me, because it's far too easy for you to lie to try and save face on the internet. Just consider it to yourself. During the Black Plague the dead lined the streets. This never happened with this disease. Globally averaged its somewhere around a 1% mortality and remember, in many countries they were putting down car accident victims as C19 deaths. It's not hard to see the evil, you don't even have to search. Its plain as day.
@@Keys879 idk anyone that died that is the truth. 2 people I know was on a vent ( there big tho. A few people at work had it twice ( there not vaxed) second time was easier than the first time. Interesting huh.
Great information thanks. Three things: 1. How can you say almost 100% of UK population has antibodies when those results are only from blood donations or tests? Has every person in the UK had an antibody test? 2. I agree ADE should be studied. Which pharma company is going to put their hand up to do that? 3. How about TREATING people that get covid instead of waiting till they have to go to hospital and by then the damage is done? I’m sick to the back teeth of hearing that the only solution to this virus is vaccines, lockdowns, masks and quarantine. Apologies for the rant.
There has been a concerted effort to suppress therapeutics. It is sinister. I wonder, after that Indian news network reported the strong arm, bully contract conditions Pfizer demands to provide countries the vaccine, if part of those contracts require the active discouraging of therapeutics. Cuz they could depress vax demand - SALES.
Yes saw that. I wondered about that too, and my first thought was that perhaps lower anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels are seen precisely due to enhanced protection from vaccinal antibodies? Virus could be cleared faster than in non-vaccinated individuals? Thoughts? So I am not sure if this is due to inhibition of natural immunity per se.
Yes this is concerning and might explain that I’m noticing my vaccinated colleagues taking longer to clear and suffering with worse colds than my unvaccinated colleagues with the same infections.
@@sutters7251 we definitely will need data on this but in the meantime, very interesting observation. It goes along with Dr. Bossche's theory of suppressing the innate immunity, but his theories are not considered seriously by other scientists. Certainly educational though.
Could this be linked to the recent Swedish publication that mRNA actually interferes with our gene function (at least in the petri dish). ? Is there any data breakdown between the different types of vaccine used in the UK ?
I will never be mandated to take a medical treatment but I was pro covid vaccine at first. The information coming out about this vaccine is getting worse as we go. We found quickly that the vaccine did not give immunity. But it was showed it still helped. As we keep going we continue to find that the benefits of the vaccine continues to drop.
6:45 true. But considering the micro numbers per million isn't this more about splitting hairs than it is about saving lives and about the destruction of people's lives?
Good video supported with data. The Hope and Desire that the vaccines do what was proposed is being held so close that many are unwilling to see the facts to the contrary
I live in Florida and have noticed first hand that there was a high percentage of fully vaccinated people getting Covid. Fully vaccinated people that I personally know were getting Covid at about the same rate as unvaccinated people when the Delta variant was peaking here.
I’d like to know how their testing for antibodies , my understanding is getting a quantitive essay is expensive, I don’t imagine they’re doing that on everyone?
It would be great to develop the screening tool that is none invasive - like breath/saliva checks for markers specific to the viral infections. And again, for those healthy and strong, getting infection is the best way of getting immunity for themselves and also for the rest of the population. Let's not forget that the nature of the virus is not to kill the host, but to propagate itself successfully throughout the time. So each generation of the virus is less and less aggressive. That's the only way for it to survive: coexistence with the hosts
You make a very good point which is too often ignored. Based on how organisms evolve, the best chance of survival for the organism is to be minimally invasive, certainly non-lethal, but easily transmitted between hosts.
Great video. Since this was made, the UK have decided that rates per 100,000 is not a good way to compare. This is because the rates in the vaccinated was rising rapidly! When it comes to these figures, the government use these rates to show there are more unvaccinated in hospitals. This is completely misleading, as the actual majority of beds in use are from the double vaccinated, around 80% at week 45.
Thank you for this information. It’s very validating for those with natural exposure antibodies who are resisting vaccination. I just want to wait to see long term results (and so far they are somewhat disturbing), and should be a part of society while I do so as there is so much evidence that splitting the population has been so faulty.
Herd immunity is not where "everyone" has antibodies against the virus. Depending on a number of factors, primarily rate of transmissibility of the virus and effectiveness of immunity from blocking transmissions, around 50% immunes in the population may be sufficient to ensure a low probability of infection for a random unvaccinated person. With regard so many in the UK having covid antibodies, this may not be as good as it appears. Vaccination/booster shots do not reliably block infection or transmission. It's like a big, wonderful boat with a hole in the bottom. It may still float, with some bailing, but it's not so big and wonderful as it appears. Vaccine protection wanes in all respects and thus does not well support a long term herd immunity. This is not the case for natural immunity, gained from recovery from covid infection. Natural immunity is 100% efficacious against reinfection (regardless of variant) and also against transmission. It appears to be highly durable, likely lifelong. Thus, natural immunity does very well support long term herd immunity and in fact will lead to zero covid over time because natural immunes kill the virus. What could prevent reaching zero covid in this manner? Vaccines that prevent infection and thereby obviate natural immunity. If you want to rely on vaccine protection you will have to expect periodic, frequent jabs, and you will live with the constant fear of some new mutation that sidesteps the vaccines. I do not find this acceptable and I don't understand how anyone could. Bottom line, if the extended UK covid prevalence is based primarily on vaccinations, then in a few months, after vaccine immunity wanes, this protection will simply disappear and a new spike in cases may develop. Which could be good, because at present, the only real, durable protection from covid is recovery from infection; moreover, we are much better now at treating covid so a case of covid should not be viewed as reason to update your will. (Snark here is probably inappropriate; my apologies, please.) Finally, there has always been a fear that the vaccines may actually "step on" natural immunity, but at present there is no empirical sign of this. The tell-tale symptom would be reinfections, which we are still not seeing. The continued absence of such indicates that natural immunity is not so easily messed with.
Thank you for such amazing post! Only possible contention is that natural immunity is 100%, as reinfection clearly occur in those who were previously infected. But it seems there is a gradient to natural immunity protection based on the severity of previous infection? Any thoughts on that? What you seem to be describing is what we could have expected in natural pandemic progression and we are obviously past that. Interesting comment also on possibility of everyone having antibodies as a potential issue. We would agree if it contributes to immune escape if those with antibodies continue to be infected. But if new more dangerous variants emerge, wouldn't everyone be negatively affected, including those with natural post infection immunity and innate immunity?
@@Merogenomics There are no reinfections. You can easily disprove this to me by naming even one counter-example. Understand that reinfection is not just two positive test results. False positives are actually not uncommon. Typically, the first test is a false positive following a cold or flu episode which presents similarly. The patient often never bothers to follow up so he/she doesn't know it's a false positive for covid. Several months later he/she might contract actual covid, so now he thinks he's been reinfected. Not so. According to the Worldometer there have been 220M recoveries from covid infection. Each of these will of course result in natural immunity. If there was a reinfection rate of, say, 1%, that would equate to 2.2M reinfections worldwide. So, it should be an easy matter to name one. To put this in perspective, suppose I was to ask, are there breakthrough infections following full vaccination? Yes. Jen Psaki. I could name many others. So could you. Breakthrough infections certainly do occur. So again I ask, name one credible example of reinfection. You should be able to rattle off several - given that simple math indicates that if reinfections do exist there must be millions of them. But you can't. Best you can do is say, I think I heard that one of the Kardashians...? No, please, no. There aren't any reinfections. Even if you could find one claimed case that hasn't been disproven, that would just be the exception that proves the rule. It's not just me saying this. Dr. Peter McCullough; Dr. Shankara Chetty (South Africa); Dr. Martin Kulldorff. Many others as well, although most will get squeamish about throwing around absolutes such as "none" or "never".
@@davidportwood233 thanks again for another amazing answer! What I like @ your responses is that you go into details and want to have a conversation as opposed to just trying to discredit someone. Good job! In terms of reinfections, I discuss these in two videos: ruclips.net/video/ZSJmTH68giY/видео.html and ruclips.net/video/1MIwcWF1dAs/видео.html and references are provided. BUT!!! Reinfections occur because not all starting infections will result in protective immunity I think. If it's a really mild infection, it might not be enough for a person to be protected next time around (but would be PCR positive)? That's actually the reason why I think that reinfections do not tell the complete picture at all, we should stratify them based on severity. Now with regards to PCR results, they should not be easily fooled by other viral infections as specific virus genome sequence is being targeted. With current high prevalence of infection, PCR positive results should be quite accurate (not necessarily so at the start of pandemic though and I explain it in this post: merogenomics.ca/blog/en/122/COVID-19-PCR-tests-are-we-over-testing-or-under-testing-Who-is-right). That's at least my understanding but I'm constantly learning new concepts with regards to this pandemic all the time. Again, thanks for awesome answer and please feel free to let me know your thoughts again.
@@Merogenomics I am neither a doctor nor a scientist of any stripe. Well, I have a little math background and I can make a relational database whistle Dixie while tap-dancing. The relational database, I mean. I can't tap-dance, either. I know less about medicine than I do about painting. I don't know enough about painting to make an ink thumbprint. I have been asked to attempt such on several occasions. However, I did take a high school biology course which left me secure in the knowledge that recovery from a virus leads to natural immunity which is robust and durable. And, said my old textbook, if I recall correctly, immunity is not parceled out as a matter of degree; you are either fully immune or you are not at all immune. If you were infected and recovered, you are fully immune. If you were not infected, you have no level of immunity. Imagine my surprise then, when I started hearing offhand remarks about covid reinfection occurring just a few months after full recovery from infection. That was not supposed to happen. But hey, what do I know? I set it aside as imponderable by the likes of me. Time passed and I began to observe that although vaccine breakthrough infections were deemed "extremely rare" they were not only occurring but they had names attached. Names that I recognized. Natural immunity was occasionally mentioned as if it was a sugarless soft drink or a Lite beer. Often said directly but more often implied, was the idea that natural immunity was a weak knock-off next to vaccine immunity, hardly deserving of recognition let alone attention. Attempting to resolve the discrepancy, I noticed as well that over time, vaccine breakthrough infections had begun piling up, always with names attached, but there was never a single case of reinfection mentioned. Not specifically, anyway. No cases of reinfection with names attached. It occurred to me, as apparently it did no one else on Earth (which is why I get paid the Big Bucks), that this absence proved something empirically. I realize now that I wasn't the only one on Earth to have realized this, it was just a matter of the medical authorities + MSM censoring objections from people who might actually matter such that John Q Public (including myself) was not allowed to hear them. That is finally changing, as vaccine breakthrough infections continue to accumulate and reinfections continue to make their absence known. I can't argue theory with you. I just continue to point out that reinfections are still not occurring, when they should be occurring in the millions, if indeed they do happen at all.
@@davidportwood233 another great post! Enjoyed the humor too! Well, my way of understanding biology is that nothing is bulletproof. How strong of a protection you might obtain could be related to a degree of severity of disease. Same with antibodies. Some antibodies can actually work against you and promote subsequent infection (antibody dependent infection) and that has already been reported in some previous COVID-19 patients. So there will be many little things that together will make the picture very complicated. But overall I agree, why are we discounting natural infection benefits is at the moment beyond my understanding, thus for now I remain ignorant. 😉
Perhaps those that are vaccinated have a higher % of comorbidities in their cohort as well . It seems likely that there is a significant percentage of the vaccinated population with conditions that severely diminish their bodies innate immune response and thus present with symptoms. Unvaccinated cohort also seems to have a disproportionate amount people who take a robust approach to health which may help prevent illness, and also may be willing to deal with symptoms personally should they arise.
Hey Jules- that’s definitely a possibility! I just wanted to mention a potential additional cause to the unexpected variance in the study that the dr. didn’t mention in his video. Or perhaps I’m wrong. If we all arrive one step closer to the truth I’m happy in the end .
All the data is very soft, poorly collected, and selectively reported. All of these conversations are classic "garbage-in, garbage-out" situation, where we microanalyze data as if the data itself is rock solid, which it isn't.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
Does the WHO have any issue with the experimental vaccines being used on a high percentage of the world's population. This leaves no ground for long term data/issues if anything bad happens from it. (long term). there needs to be a limit on trial vaccines per population. Otherwise there is no data from unvax compared to Vax. Trial vaccines should be for the vulnerable, also at the individuals choice.
Thank you for a very balanced review. It makes me realize how fantastic the human immune system is. In my view, far superior to any band of scientists bumbling around in a laboratory. By the way, I used to be a scientist!
I'm in the 30-39 group. According to these graphs, 10.1 people out of 100k unvaccinated people will be hospitalised and 0.4 unvaccinated people out of 100k will die. Let's look at that as percentages. 10.1 / 100 000 = 0.0101 % 0.4 / 100 000 = 0.000399999 % THIS is what I'm supposed to be terrified of?! Edit: Let's throw in the 80 + category for good measure. 74.8 / 100 000 = 0.074799999 % 121.1 / 100 000 = 0.121099999 % Even if you're over 80 years old, you have a 0.1 % chance of dying when unvaccinated?! Side note: Peculiar how more people die at 80+ than are hospitalized, no?
The hospitalization curves can indicate vaccinated feeling confident they're protected while still experiencing symptoms don't check in while fearful unvaxed will, regardless of severity of symptoms. I would like to see some study of ordinary flue incidence. How it is with normal seasonal prevalence that we aren't being bombarded with their advisories.
@@kuroki-_-4909 Yeah, controlled trials are much more protected from letting selection bias skew them. And yes, in trials the vaccines greatly protect agaisnt getting infection. If everyone in a population were getting tested regularly this data would be more useful.
7:30 how much is that comparing to other diseases in the meantime? Can we see a chart together comparing other diseases for these groups and why there is no such rush and urgent treatment for all other diseases?
I think it's simply that a large part of those vaccinated had previously got covid and their immunity gives better protection. On the other hand, the unvaccinate without immunity have a much higher chance of being hospidalized. I feel the measuring the efficacy of a vaccine is difficult when the vaccinated and the unvaccinated populations have different acquired immunity, and the result is that we are underestimating vaccine efficacy. When I say a larte part of the unvaccinate must have previously contracted COVID comes from the antibody graph. If 98% of the population has some antibody protection (either vaccine or covid) but only 20% got Covid, there is little room for unvaccinated that never contracted Covid.
I have a hard time taking an asymptomatic case as anything all that negative anyway. I suppose that describes most of the kids' cases. My understanding is that they don't spread it much either. (extra comment): Based on what I'm seeing @11:28, the people who should consider the vaccine are those 60 and above. For 80+, you could make the case that it is very advisable given the risks and benefits. For those under 60 with no conditions that make covid worse, it seems to me that vaccines are a risk with very little benefit. That's the conclusion I would draw from these numbers. I'm not seeing how other possible treatments that may or may not be used after Covid is diagnosed figure in to the numbers. It looks like not at all, so it's not a complete picture of what is best to do anyway.
asymptomatic spread it 2:5 what are you going on about? Kids dont spread it to adults? HUH? The other "treatments" like the antiviral pils prevent the virus from multiplying and do not give you antibodies like the vaccine does.
@@derekmoore8224 I didn't say it here, but I have had the position in other comments that I think the elderly (especially 70+) should strongly consider these vaccinations since they are indeed at high risk from Covid. But nobody should be forced.
@@pandorachild Your perspective here, similar to that of millions of other Americans, represents a radical new way of viewing disease that is not compatible with human freedom as we have known it. There will never be an end to lockdowns or compulsory/coerced vaccines/new medicines. So no, I'm not on board. People need to make medical decisions based on their own needs, not the collective.
@@pandorachild To continue the thought, I am not opposed to public health in principle, but within reasonable limits and with the understanding that total disease control comes at way to high of a price.
8:45 : I believe there's a 3rd reasonable hypothesis to consider, which is that unvaccinated people are naturally more cautious when it comes to hygiene, because most of them are aware they are subject to a higher death probability if they actually get infected. The combination of your 1st hypothesis with this one is even stronger to explain those results.
Actually no, from my experience not being vaxxed I just go do everything like I would if COVID wasn’t a thing. Only wear mask when forced, only wash my hands when I get home. I even smoked a joint with my friend last week who was very sick, maybe even COVID but guess what? I’m not even sick cuz yuno what instead of taking this bs vaccine instead I just started eating healthier to boost my immune system
I could see that, I am 67 and did not take the jab so I just mostly stay away from people. Kids and ex wife are 600 miles away. I am retired so I don't have to mingle with people plus like the other guy said work on getting as healthy as possible with natural way.
The reason there are more infections in the vaccinated is they represent a larger portion of the population group now. So if 80% of 50-59 year olds are vaccinated then they represent a much larger subset of the population compared with the 20% unvaccinated. So therefore there are many more vaccinated people that have various stages of waning immunity and therefore exposed. Moreover , natural immunity will be beginning to bring robust immunity to the unvaccinated group.
So even if we give this as true, we still know definitively there is no public good to forcing everyone to get vaccinated. It doesn't stop transmission or infection. It is a personal therapy and that's it. So, it should be a choice
Within a month and a half January 2020-march 2020 only "a" covid virus is present,(pre vaccine roll out)simultaneously ,from england a "variant" is "discovered",thus rendering all covid vaccine useless.Its all made up mate,you should have been paying attention,most have.If you think %80 are vaccinated,i have some land in Florida to sell you.
I understand but by using that excuse you're losing your ability to have a control model to compare it to, even a small one. The same can be said flipped: The reason country x has 80% of cases in hospital is because country x population is 80% unvaxxed.
Dr Raszek,at 13:26 when you explain the Gap in the data from where the vaccines came from - could this be called Herd Immunity “lite”? As in fact, Herd Immunity functions to corral the virus and extinguish it in a group whereas this vaccinated component of the graph does not delay or retard virus progress, but instead introduces the frank possibility (Maybe proved by the existence of Delta variant) ADE component. SO wouldn’t a better or perhaps necessary graph or dataset be for REINFECTIONS which presumably would be very low for the Previously infected vs High for the vaccinated? Have you come across this type of statistic on their (or any) government website?
Wow, what a question Jason! I never thought of that but that is a really good idea! To graph it as reinfection between vaccinated and versus naturally infected. I discuss that exact experiment in vaccines update video 12: ruclips.net/video/ZSJmTH68giY/видео.html So at least we have first clues from the Israel data
The problem is that way too many vaccinated get hospitalized and die. There is no way to determine the success of the vaccine without knowing if someone was actually exposed and their vaccine worked.
True for England and possibly NI, but both Scotland and Wales have had restrictions throughout the past 6 months, and Wales is introducing segregation of 2-dose vaccinated vs unvaccinated/1-dose from today, with total lockdown's threatened if that doesn't reduce cases. Given that 2-dose population has more cases per 100k,...it would seem inevitable for Wales and Scotland to entire full lockdowns this winter.
I am in the UK so I thought I would clarify. There are no restrictions on movement, mask wearing, social distancing or vaccination status within the UK. The only restrictions are asked for by some hospitals and vets. We are mixing freely with each other since July 21, hence the high herd immunity. I propose that vaccinated people are getting nasal and throat infections and not lung, hence the symptoms are mild.
also do you have any idea where they take the 'low confidence' numbers from about vaccines stopping transmission? This is such a vital point considering its beeing forced upon so many (young) people with major negative consequences involved (exclusion from society, loosing jobs etc) if one does not get vaccinated. I do not want to take it to protect myself but i might´if I can through that protect my older family etc. But if it doesnt do that i really dont want to have it :(
If not mistaken, the confidence intervals are expected to cover 95% likelihood that a value in this entire range is expected to be true. What these intervals tell you is where you can expect the realistic observation in a population to be. So it could be anywhere between these provided values. If the confidence interval is wide, it gets less informative, and it shows you that there was too much variation observed in a data, and could be due to small population sample. The sad part is that breakthrough cases are now so large anywhere you look that vaccination alone cannot guarantee at all for now that it will protect others from not being infected by the vaccinated person (we will see later on if that changes with another variant, or another additional treatment option like either boosters or some medications). Reduced chance, yes sure, but not a guarantee at all. So unfortunately for now the way I see it, if one wants to be absolutely sure they are not putting others at risk, is to test themselves.
Hi there , it's freedom of choice but me I'll never take any of these human trials on humanity , the first 2 jabs eliminate 75% of the persons Immune system so anyone that has had both jabs then they only have 25% left to fight infections or viruses , now you come to the boosters, the 1st booster contains 81 strains of foreign bacteria that your body has no idea what they are & the 2nd booster contains 8 strains of HIV , it takes 8 weeks for anyones body to produce new white blood cells as this is why the jabs are 8 weeks apart to hit the immune system again , once the people take the boosters then they will never be able to produce white blood cells again , white blood cells are your 1st line of defence to eliminate any virus or any infection, this is a bioweapon created in Wuhan by Fauci , why are people referring to these jabs as vaccines because this is in trials until 2023 , so it's trials , just saying
@@gregorymailman9733 , i don't care what your opinion is & I'm quite surprised that people answer you back , as your very rude & my brother that died in 2020 in hospital here in Scotland & not from covid-19 either i know he died o high altitude sickness & died from a Thrombosis & not covid , this has effected so many millions around the world , so my advice to you is don't comment on things i post as if you can't be respectful towards people then it's a waste of time & if you have no self respect then how can you have respect for others , I'm not going to insult people like you do as all that happens is people go round in circles with no solution in sight , so you stay safe & mellow out & ingage with people in a respectful manner & you maybe surprised that people may answer you with the same respect , my energy is not wasted on people like , we have never met & me personally i wouldn't insult someone i know let alone insult someone I've never met , so you keep being a troll to get a reaction from people & thoughts like that you can leave me out of , you have a good life & try & settle down with your comments towards people & keep them to yourself
@@stanleystewart4880 Where re you getting that info though. I thought the booster was more of the same stuff The HIVgp120 spike is already in the vaccine that is how it gets in your cells but where is the info on it destroying your immune system I haven't seen that or that the booster aren't just more of the same stuff.
The graph is different from the table because they don’t know how to do math, how it’s possible when you have 203 total : unvaccinated 101, double doses 87 and when you look at per 100000 vaccinated 2.1 and unvaccinated 8.2🤣🤣 but when you enter the number in the graph he can’t cheat😁😁
Well, if most people are vaccinated in a population wouldn't you expect that group to have the most infection cases? I think a better number would be the ratio of breakthrough cases to the total number vaccinated and same with the unvaccinated.
in England we can go anywhere btw - medicated or not so hypothesis #1 is to be forgotten, #2 is more likely and what many of us believed from day dot and why there is such a strong argument against the medication from many of us
Dr. Raszek, could you please do a video/investigation on whether there is any connection between blood type and propensity of infection? Is there any connection?
I’ve tried to share the gov.health England technical notice 22 variants of concern report. This keeps getting removed so this info is obviously something that ‘they’ don’t want seen. Page 22. Last table bottom line shows 💀 from delta for vaccinated is 1091 compared with 536 unvaccinated. How should we interpret this data? Have you got content on any other site such as Odysee?
Currently only use RUclips and post articles on my blog: merogenomics.ca/blog/ I'm ok with whatever RUclips algorithms are doing. I'm hoping it's in good conscience. Yes, we have seen the COVID-19 deaths trends in the UK for long time now (UK posts amazing weekly reports, top quality, they also are incredible in tracking viral strains - just amazing quality science, but UK is one of the best nations in the world that adopted the power of genomics, our main interest). Believe it was discussed in this video: ruclips.net/video/mGAkV1G5CkU/видео.html Just checked the latest report this morning, and this trend continues. The Delta and Delta+ doesn't seem to discriminate much 😥 Let's hope this even soon
Backed up by actual documents! 👍 Great video & useful info. I shared your video with someone I know who’s currently fighting against Biden’s mandate. Let’s Go Brandon!
Another possibility for why more vaccinated people are getting covid than unvaxxed is this: It is well established (but largely ignored) that diet, exercise, and obesity play enormous roles in susceptibility to covid. (Yes, you can find athletes who have died from it, but they are exceptions.) People who are in poorer physical condition are probably more likely to depend on the Vax than those who are in good health and eat an immune-healthy diet. So they catch covid more easily, whether they are vaxxed or not.
I have one question about this data doctor and i wish to know your opinion on this. In the statistics of unvaccinated people ending up in hospital ( 6:30 ) , how many of those unvaccinated people ending up in hospital could be having comorbidities causing them to not be able to get vaccinated and also causing them to be at higher risk to get hospitalized... This would inflate these numbers of unvaccinated people getting hospitalized and thus not be representative for the entire group of unvaccinated people? In the vaccinated group this will not happen because people are screened for known health issues causing possible problems in conjunction with the vaccination before getting vaccinated.
Given that the backlog of patient appointments is now well over 3.5 million due to all the delays caused by how the NHS has failed to keep pace with 'normal' health issues, it's likely that many more severely ill people are hitting hospitals with Covid in addition to their comorbidity, or catching covid while in hospital for those non-covid related illnesses. UK has had 75,000 deaths 'at home' above the norm due to the failure of the health service to prioritise resources,...in some age groups that NHS/Political failure alone is a bigger killer than covid-19.
It’s really difficult to know who to believe, everyone wants to tell a story. I still feel that investment in the NHS would have been a better long term spend than furlough.
Thank you for this video. I think people who had their first jab shoudn't be put in the group of the unvaccinated. Are there more specific data that show how the difference between unvaccinated and the persons between their first jab and two weeks after their second one is?
Yes, this happens in other vaccine “ research”. If researchers put people who have had a covid vaccine as not being vaccinated then they are liars and the so called research is not just worthless but actually giving the opposite message so is worse than no data at all. In France very shortly even two vaccines will mean for many they are in the same group as the non-vaccinated and their vaccine passes will automatically be erased.
My presupposition, from a human behavioral perspective, is that people who have been vaccinated may ignore guidelines suggesting they have a high likelihood of infection and transmission (I.e. by going to concerts and other public settings) and due to the immune response minimizing symptoms, may even ignore symptoms and continue to spread covid. It is the logical behavioral outcome of changing guidelines for a population that is primarily protected from severe disease. (i.o.w I think vaccinated people are less afraid of transmission)
I makes sense. I cringed when my sister told me that, after she got the vaccine, she went and visited my 95 year old grandmother. I'm amazed at what people think the vaccine does vs what it actually does.
Great vid, thanks for doing this Dr. Raszek!
00:00 Latest UK data
00:22 Surprise: Vaccinated MORE infected than unvaccinated. Or is it? Let's see.
00:42 COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 41
01:00 **98% of population has antibodies w/19.7% from Infection
01:23 1st published instance of HERD IMMUNITY?
01:50 TABLE 1: Summary of vaccine effectiveness (outcomes Delta)
02:00 low confidence for this table though. Maybe misleading
02:55 FIGURE 1: data showing ages and vaccination Dose 1
03:51 FIGURE 2: data showing ages and vaccination Dose 2
04:37 TABLE 2: Covid cases by Vaccination status week 37-40
05:13 Most interesting data in last two columns.
05:49 if >30 vaccinated more frequently infected
06:15 the first time seeing data breakdown like this is fantastic
06:23 TABLE 3: Hospitalizations in the UK
06:42 Vaccinated LESS LIKELY to be hospitalized though.
06:52 TABLE 4: Deaths and vaccination status
07:11 Extremely low values for
But BIGLY difference on who dies! Practically Everyone dying in USA are... UNvaccinated.
Please kindly explain how do one gets a rate of 0.4 deaths for 100.000 habitants out of 12 cases (unvaccinated people up to 29 years).
COVID-19 is the biggest fraud against humanity
@@2011barnstormer That's what Germans said about death camps- we should make the live deniers clear out the the dead deniers from their hospital beds.
Interesting data assuming it's accurate. Agree, it would be interesting to see the data from countries that Pfiser and other mRNA vaccines. From all that I have read this is the real danger period for medium term effects of these vaccines. Need a lot more research in to breakthrough infections caused by mutations, rate of mutations, evolving variants and immune responses to those changes in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated/natural immunity. Was informative thanks
It is my choice to decide what goes into my body! No government authority has the right over my freedom of choice. I prefer natural immunity and allowing my innate, adaptive and interferon system perform it's protection.
So long as if you are unfortunate to require hospitalisation, you stoically and bravely refuse treatment?
Beds around the world are full of unvacinated ppl like yourself
@@stuartburns8657 that is not true. The vaccinated are the ones spreading, it doesn't even stop getting "covid."
@@naz0079 It's easy to blinker yourself into only reading and listening to certain sources of info to validate an option Naz.
I have to watch myself on this also, as before you know it you're in an echo chamber getting your own biases re-enforced.
You are correct btw. The vaccine won't stop you getting Covid and nor will it stop you spreading it. That was never the intention of it. The whole point is to reduce hospitalisation. Simple case.
Case in hand. I'm 47 and had both shots (UK btw)
My wife and Daughter got the "C" (both jabbed) and had to isolate. 6 days later I caught it.
So did the wife's parents who're mid 70's. 1 with chronic asthma and 1 with a heart condition.
Pre vaccine I'm certain at least one of them would have died. Lucky they been wise enough to accept the jabs, and after 2 weeks of feeling like crap and home made a full recovery.
As to vaccinated ppl spreading it?
Of course as more ppl are vaccinated than not, it's simple maths Naz?!
Despite being stuck in a house with 2 x covid infected ppl, I was a while getting it, and even then none of the home testing showed I was positive, and it took 2 lab tests to get the positive result.
4 days after it was confirmed I lost taste and smell. Other than feeling under the weather, if I'd not suspected due to being with covid positive family, I'd have been out and about and just assuming it was a common cold.
I isolated and was able to carry on working from home. It wiped out the wife (men are used to man-flu lol!) but 6 weeks later still not fully regained taste 'n smell.
@@naz0079 6:42 and 11:20 in the vid. Less hospital for those vaccinated and a reminder that the jab is to reduce symptoms to make you immune and won't stop you spreading it.
Watch the vid properly.
And go get the vaccine eh?
@@stuartburns8657 no thanks. I will NOT allow this synthetic genetic material enter my body. Informed consent, it is my choice!
At 11:00 Dr. Raszek said (paraphrasing), "These vaccines were approved for protecting you from severe disease outcomes - none of them were ever approved for stopping infections." This begs the question - why vaccinate children? They have no fear of severe outcomes and the fact that they're vaccinated won't help curb infections to older (more at risk) people.
@Stephen H. Li there is a need to shift from a public health approach ( vaccinate everyone ) to an individual protection case. UK had sunk all it,s hope,s in the vaccine doing the job of stopping the infection, without ( or regardless ) of the actual data. And must remember no scientists in cabinet. Had lost the battle on testing, so vaccines had to be the saviour! From what I recall, Pfizer had not done PCR on the infected post vaccination( plus that lost data ) so it was all an ‘extrapolated’ wish. AZ had done PCR on post vaccinated infected ( v small numbers ). Need to read the paper again. 6% of those studied were >65yrs.
Children don't fear things the way grown ups do.
Children cope differently.
@UC4L29PzJ3Lia6Y7E_73tcEQ
Are you sure it's only 5 ?
Confidence in any medical body that doesn't acknowledge or recognise other medical experts in the field .
Based merely on prejudice or the fact that they don't go along with a dogmatic established view,
Should in the name of science be rejected.
social experiment; look at austria right now; no waxx, no rights at all. you bow down, you're god to go. you refuse to play their game; work, quick stop at local grocery to get cheap junk food and back home. day after day after day...
The purebloods can go anywhere we want in England
Boris has no power here
I like purebloods ! My hubby was calling me organic until reading this. Thanks 😊
Perhaps I judged you too harshly, House Slytherin...
@@aprilcl4929 My pleasure 😊❤️🙏🏴 greetings from England
Let's Go Brandon 🇺🇸
@Hell's favorite Salty Masshole
Purebloods
Let's Go Brandon 🇺🇸
Damn straight we can the blonde haired muppet doris has no powers over me i never believe a word he says .
The deaths from covid in the vaccinated and the deaths from covid in the unvaccinated per 100,000 is only half the story, To be able to evaluate the vaccine you also need the deaths per 100,000 from ALL CAUSES in the vaxxed and the unvaxxed.
Watch Testimonies The Project. Here on YT. These people also need a voice.
Here is a nice video discussing all-cause mortality and its relation to this same UK data:
ruclips.net/video/LBDd0yH8OuI/видео.html&ab_channel=ThinkingSlow
2020 they count the covid deaths the same way.
The whole thing has been a scam. How so many took these vaccines amazes me and big pharma. Every one has to pay for them not just the vaxxed. They refused to let doctors
treat and get it under control. Their excuses are disingenuous as to why they want everyone
jabbed, including the
children. I wonder what is going to happen to all those vaccinated not the unvaccinated.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
In the UK, 'Fully vaccinated' means vaccinated with a MHRA recognised vaccine in line with the MHRA recommended number of doses for the vaccine used and TWO WEEKS has passed for the vaccine to take effect.
So anyone suffering an injury after taking the vaxx, is considered 'unvaccinated' until the 15th day AFTER the second dose.
This needs to be CLEARLY STATED in ALL studies involving the COVID 'vaccines'.
A remarkable fact! Is there somewhere I can review this ? Links?
@@574130 - It appears in the NHS documents 'When to self-isolate and what to do' and 'Approved COVID-19 vaccines and countries and territories with approved proof of vaccination'. Also stated in the Scottish 'Coronavirus (COVID-19): vaccine certification scheme'. I have not seen it stated on any comparative studies so far.
@Jay Jay plays a part in the adverse reactions side of things though... many do not get recorded and are brushed aside by Drs (threat of termination if caught spreading hesitancy, etc. - even going so far as to recommend 2nd doses to those who have suffered anaphylaxis from the 1st)
You're a special one. This isn't how they classify adverse reactions, only with respect to being full immunized/ protected. If you react after having the vaccine they still log it dummy.
Here's a possible solution to this: the magic sauce DOESN'T WORK.
When the penny drops👉😱
That's not a possible solution...
That's a statement.
Of corse it does, if I didn’t have it I would have died hahahaha. These are the kind of divs I’m surrounded by. The fact they had covid before the vaccine and had zero to moderate symptoms. Then contracted covid after the vaccinations and were really ill and still not right, given up exercise or work in some cases.
@@timmysawdust193 Haha ‘Divs’ love that word, haven’t heard it in ages. Listen to this for the div mentality. In April a friend (aged 49) couldn’t wait to get the jibby. I suggested maybe he should wait because it was unlikely he’d die if he got cov1d. He said he didn’t want to get covid & that’s why he was getting the jibby. 3 months later after being double jibbied he got cov1d. This week he said he knew back in April that you could still get covid even if vaccinated. Yet back in April his whole reason for getting jibbied was because he didn’t want to get cov1d. 😂😂😂😂
These people are completely in denial of their own stupidity. Either that or they know they’ve been a div & just don’t want to look stupid.
Charles the Hammer. In a nutshell. But wait! You can have a 3rd shot that won’t work!
In life “there are three kinds of lies; Lies Damn Lies, and Statistics.” Mark Twain
very true
Every Mark Twain quote always seems to be on the money!
My fav is : If voting made difference, they wouldn't let us do it
@@flint2001 ha ha yes very true
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
@@flint2001 ...
How about this one...
“Politicians are like nappies, they need changing regularly and for the same reason.”
~~ _Mark Twain._
If they are just throwing in numbers where there is low confidence, what confidence can their be in the rest of the data?
Which part is low-confidence exactly? Looking at the data, the "unlinked" meaning "unverifiable" portion of that data is only about 5~10%. So 90~% confidence? That might not be good enough for real scientists and medical regulators. However, most anti-vaxxer hedge their bets entirely on unverified stuff and blind-faith with numbers that they pull from a hat. So I'd say the confidence level of this study is pretty high in comparison. lol
Much like the six foot rule they pulled out of their a$$.
Alex Frank Watching the video would answer your question. In the table referenced only two entries are of high confidence. Footnotes add further doubts over the data. There seems to be an intent to present a best scenario but this has been impossible.
Simple numbers like counting cases and comparing per vax status are trustworthy.
Confidence levels are needed when it gets more complicated like estimating vaccine efficacy (like those figures labelled low confidence in the beginning of the vid did)
The numbers with low confidence were the design assumtions.
Interperate the graphs for numbers with confidence.
It was found here in the US that if an unvaccinated person went to the hospital for another medical issue (morbidity is what they are calling it), but you ended up testing "positive" through the false-positive producing PCR (non)test, you were counted as an unvaccinated hospitalized case count. The CDC has already issued guidance on how to test vaccinated and unvaccinated to ensure clinics are registering a higher amount of unvaccinated positives than vaccinated positives.
It's been that way from the beginning. I know of a few people who were in auto, motorcycle wrecks....taken to hospital.....they were tallied up as covid deaths.
@@americansfirst1095 they admitted to it. Falsifying info
Exactly. It was over 50% of "c0vid infections" too.
So over half weren't hospitalised for cv. They went in with a broken leg ect tested positive and got included in the figures lol
OVER 50%
@@americansfirst1095 I know someone who died of cancer and they had covid on thier death cert.
I also know someone who died of stabbing and they got labeled the same.
The Fraud is unreal.
can you show me the cdc guidance?
Covid nurse here, med Tele unit. Our inpatients (non vent unit) have tended to be fully vaccinated. Up to 70%, on a given day. Some vaccinated have to go to the ICU to be vented.
are these people getting interventions at early stages of onset to avoid this...antivirals for example? (regardless of vac. status).
@@1907jdee Good question. I've heard early intervention is key. Perhaps those who are vaccinated are waiting longer for help hence the reason they end up in the hospital.
Does anyone survive the vent?
@@brendamarie7627 Maybe the shots are making people sick
UK NURSE? those numbers would reflect the population rates of vaxxed and non vaccinated. So it’s not an unusual number if you believe as I do that the vaccines do not really prevent serious sickness for very long and have no protection against infection.
im against vaccine mandate and i appreciate the video
im glad vaccine work for people that need it.
im against forcing super healthy people like me to take it, especially when we are already 80%+ vaxed
Side effects with no benefits.
Everyone has a risk of stroke, so should we put everyone on blood thinners?
@@superchuck3259 like i said, im no one to tell if you should take a vaccine or not. It is your own choice and has to be. Yes i think this vaccine is rushed and that one of the reason i dont want it beside the fact that covid is very benin for my age group
@@superchuck3259 I have similar thoughts. 18million cardiovascular death per year. Shall we mandate healthy diet, exercise, and burn McDonald ?
Sure, but my son is an ICU doc and he's receiving more and more young super healthy people like you, in their late 20s and 30s arriving for treatment. All are unvaxxed and all desperately ill. Two died last week (damaged lungs and unable to ventilate). The family (all unvaxxed) of one of them begged the medics to give their son the vax and did not understand when told that it was too late to vaccinate once Covid had taken hold.
@@kevinsyd2012 Is he saving their lives anyways? I heard threats that unvaccinated were just being left to die with rational it is their fault for not getting vaccinated.
Thank you for the validation. Natural immunity people like myself feel they don't the vaccine and that's OK. 💯
Natural immunity is always best
You are not alone.
Yeah and I'm sure you're feeling isn't influenced by politics. Funny how all the dead and in ICU are Trump supporters who are un-vacinated. I would much rather have a mild Covid infection and be vaccinated than be un-vacinated and be dead or get long haul Covid. Nice avatar.
But you won't be allowed leave your house soon if the control freaks get their way
@@Orangestardust good for you
The only places in the US that are barring the unvaxed are some major, liberal cities like LA and NYC. In the vast majority of the US, it's life as normal.
No. All Democrat governor (blue) states ALLOW and encourage vax discrimination. Still happening in a lot of venues.
I recently moved out of NY to a southern state. It’s a world of difference. A lot less oppressive.
The number of infections among vaccinated and unvaccinated actually follows the real life ratio of vaccination. If you check the CORRELATION, you will see, that it is almost ZERO.
Conclusion: the vaccines reduces the symptoms, but has literally ZERO effect on becoming infected.
@@pipedreamer2u You will also notice that cities in the North are more segregated than in the South. Not saying that the South is devoid of ignorant racists, but just saying that there is more racism in the BLM loving blue states than is let on.
Washington state apparently has a covid passport
I have a grave concern about this. If lets say, according to this data, that the vaccinated have a slightly higher chance of getting infected for whatever reason, And if what I heard about the vaccines potentially causing the body to have less varying ways to protect against it is true, then there is a huge problem here. Because we know now that the vaccines effectiveness wares off in months time, id assume your death and hospitalization protects also wears off too, but you are still with the heightened risk of catching covid again. Meaning you would be theoretically be at a higher risk of death and hospitalizations later on once the vaccines effectiveness wares off. Which then would force people to get shots or booster shots very often, like once every 6 months or so, just to stay protected, because their bodies are also not as equipped anymore to fight it off naturally by itself anymore. like weird cycle that gets you trapped into taking the shots forever.
Chris Lee
The only thing that was clear to me in your comment was the fourth word in the first sentence.
@@eyemnew2991 convoluted but what they have written is possible
BINGO
@@tintinorasterix8270
Anything is possible, but it has to happen right?
@@eyemnew2991 yes sorry. Sometimes my english is not that great so I may have explained in weird way. if it is not understood what I was trying to say, then thats ok. Thank you.
Thank you for doing this Doc. At around 10:00 on your possible conclusions about why the unvaccinated are affected less than the vaccinated, I would like to assist with info as I live in the UK and inform you and your audience that since the beginning of summer 2021 everywhere is open for both vaccinated and unvaccinated without the need of wearing masks except in public busses and the tube and also without the need to show any type of test results or proof of vaccination. So the possibility that the numbers are lower due to the difficulty or prohibition of unvaccinated people to go somewhere can be ruled out. All the best and please keep doing your research, we need people like you more than any other time. Thank you.
Agree, except some large gathering events (outdoor concerts etc) are proof of vaxed only 🤔
@@noseahead Exactly, I was just focused on the day to day activities that most people do.
@Neon Night
My point being, all those vaxed people together, without unvaxed, and they are still getting ill 😶
@@noseahead Yeah, unfortunately this is another situation where it is clear as day that the jab is not helping with the spread, but still many governments are pushing it as the only solution due to contracts with big pharma.
Thank you for sharing this information.
Make sure that you take your 5 year old in to get the jab. In a few months it will probably be required all the way to newborns. Gotta get them jabbed too. Forget about all of the side effects and deaths from it. Just do as you are told.
Yeah, sure.
ADE is a major concern and should be studied much more
Yes, I heard cases are exploding in western australia amongst vaccinated people. This was confirmed by their governor
ADE is checked for in clinical trials, and so far none. It would present as more severe disease, but vaccinated have less severe disease. The ZOE Covid study shows they have less symptoms for shorter duration.
@@alexdevcamp In the UK the hospitals are full of fully vaccinated people suffering with some form of ADE. So you are incorrect.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
Yes!!! We just injected this junk into our best and brightest that care for us!!!! We must keep them healthy!!!! The Who already killed how many? It air born my you know what!
Don’t take the clotshot if you value your life and well being.
You do realize that clotting is part of the covid disease but so much worse as to cause death. Clot issues are not unique to the vaccine. Given that AZ vax is adenovirus, consider that a recipient who experiences clots would certainly have clots from actual disease. It’s foolish to blame a vaccine for less severe side effects that are experienced in the wild and variant virus.
7:10 ... So why do they want to jab the youngsters under 18? Think twice people!!! Something is not right here!!!
Feels wrong to me when most kids get very mild symptoms! Is it really worth messing with their natural immunity?
This feels a throwback from wanting to protect the old by immunising the young as well...but they must see that is no longer the case.
This is the bit that feels wrong to me.
It seems uneccessary at the moment.
Over 50's probably need all jabs including a booster but under 50 just don't seem to.
@@l.plzsavethebeez485 thank you for supporting my thoughts! But as long as we don't understand what natural immunity is, how should our kids?
@@thebrowns5337 try looking into Andrew Read from Penn State University. Mankind is heading the wrong way with these Vaccines! Only time will tell, when the hospitals are only filled with Vaccinated patients!!!
never put your faith in man. age has nothing to do with beating a cold.
We need more people making videos like you do about vaccines. Very refreshing seeing a more critical point of view. I read some of articles and I questioned few things and you answer/question same points as well.
Is there an ingredient list? Pharmacists don't have a clue and if your on medication and nobody can figure out adverse reactions to current medications...thank you
You can look up the monograph for each vaccine online. Ingredients are listed in the monograph. Additionally, the person administering the vaccine should be able to provide a copy of the monograph/vaccine components upon request. If they refuse to provide this, they’re not doing their job and you should probably go elsewhere. Medication interactions aren’t usually an issue with vaccines; allergies to components are a bigger concern.
@@alienlizardqueen8748
All ingredients are not shown. They admit the proprietary ingredients are not.
Poison. That is the ingredients list
Alien Lizard Queen The monographs differ from country to country. They do present a full ingredient list. I’m afraid conspiracy theorists have created dubious assertions about certain ingredients and their origins.
@@alienlizardqueen8748 I watched some American on YT yesterday go to a pharmacy and ask for a list of ingredients for the Moderna vaccine. There was none available, no info leaflet in the pack, nothing online even. He was advised by the chemist to conatct Moderna directly.
I was following just Dr John Campbell, but am now also following you. Your doing a great job of presenting Scientific facts and explaining them.
Thankyou for your videos!
Dr john is bloody fool at best and absolute fruad at worst.
@@damianpos8832 and a drama queen,
He's now slowly changing his position. 🙄
You bowed to your king, you bowed to your boss, you went along with their lies so your life stays comfortable, you knew in your gut none of this was on accident, you refused to listen to the warnings of the ones that had nothing to gain but only criticism, and now you're going to take more, more, and more. You get what you deserve.
The efforts and time to to create and broadcast these facts are truly appreciated.
Blessed Art Thou, HALLELUJAH
The problem with this analysis is that it does not represent the 3 district groups: Vaccinated, Not-vaccinated with previous Covid, Not vaccinated without previous Covid.. Many of these studies combines those with natural immunity with those with no immunity, causing misleading results. I would speculate that those non-vaccinated that were hospitalized did not have previous exposure. It should not be that difficult to break these results into the 3 distinct groups.
What amazes me is the lack of critical thinking of most of the researchers in the medical field. Like you, it is very apparent to me that we have to dig deeper to get any meaningful results.
We also have huge attitude and lifestyle difference from vaxed and non-vaxed.
What about tobacco use (nicotine to be precise). Studies showed nicotine helped keep Covid at bay.
What about general health conditions like weight?
For three years now this has been going on.
COVID and the vaccines should be given an award for best outstanding achievements of designer outdoor wear.
I would agree, but the thing is anti body tests are not being performed in many countries, at least not for free, to further push the "vaccine" narrative. so such a data set is not available.
Need to include vaccinated with previous covid as well
@@phatneazy
Don't forget to add eggs to this mixture and whip it good.
Thanks for this presentation. I would love to see the whole data set gathered by PHE. Not just the cherry picked snippets to support the policy. I would suggest that antibody studies in donated blood should be reviewed on the basis of occupation of those blood donors as I believe it may slant towards occupations with higher vaccine compliance and virus exposure .than the general population.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
See comment above on ONS data sets. Front line workers pre vaccines arguably had highest exposure.. The vaccinated may have initially been in safer working environments & home working. Time lines would be significant . UK data also segmented across different socio economic grps.
Lol, Covid19 is theoretical and the PCR test used for diagnosing cases is not a valid test for viruses! (Start with Dr Sam Baily, Kary Mullis, and go from there although it pretty much ends with them) Its a very high probability that those with actual symptoms and have died have or had influenza!!
@@jimeagle1952 I assume you,re not working in intensive medicine nor have seen the disease upfront. Not sure how much Sam Bailey has seen in NZ when she was making all those pronouncements last yr. Agreed, the PCR test is a poor way to detect infectious so they can isolate. So much discussion now on testing. See Carl Henegan.
But SARS2 is real and the disease is real for those with severe illness. But risk is skewed. See Spiegelhalter. But don,t spread non - science.
Vaccines for elderly and people with underlining health conditions and ivermectin and D3 for everyone else but must be a choice.
D3/k2, vit.C. zinc, exercise and fresh air, whatever your age. Your immunity can be high even in old age.
I read this report about a week ago and was initially shocked; then I thought about it and what occurred to me is this. Regarding the rates per 100,000 infection among vaxxed/unvaxxed - wouldn't this be about what we should expect to see for a vaccine that doesn't prevent infection (without it needing to be due to antibody dependent enhancement?) Perhaps I'm wrong, but my thinking is... if you take a random sample of 100,000 people from the adult UK population, something like 85% would be vaccinated and 15% not. So, the probability that an infected person is also vaccinated is high - much higher than the probability that the person will be unvaccinated (the same rationale given for why there are high rates of infection amongst unvaccinated children and young people). So, is this just a statistical anomaly?
Another factor could be the high rates of natural immunity here which might turn out to offer better protection against reinfection (though I'm not sure where the research stands on this at the moment).
In terms of unvaccinated people having less contact, I would say that's unlikely. I've recently moved from Canada to the UK (to avoid the mandates and vax passes) and society is, at the moment, very open here to all. No restrictions.
What do you think? Is that reasoning sound?
First point no, second point yes.
Yes, I forget what the statisticians name is the fact checks things, but he essentially said the same thing. The sheer number of vaccinated people vs the small number of unvaccinated with the fact that vaccines don't actually prevent infection or spread (they might hamper it slightly but not much at all from what I understand, although they do reduce serious health impacts) means tne figures will show many vaccinated folk, more so than unvaccinated as being infected. Thjs is a positive really as it means those people who have antibodies from the vaccines then get to safely top up/refresh their antibodies following infection. They should be set then. Unless the virus mutates in a spectacular fashion. Even then they'll likely be better protected than the unvaxxed.
And as for the folk that say people got ill after the vaccine, including dying. Well yes. Normal life and all other infections and accidents and health issues due to lifestyle will continue so peoplethat have been jabbed will still get ill and some may die. Linking it to the jab is daft. The fact most of these people will have been eating processed food, drinking alcohol, smoking kr just breathing our polluted air (which can be attributed forhelping along 20% of deaths these days)...the vaccine can't help these people apart from to stop them getting seriously ill from Covid19.
@@thebrowns5337 nope, it’s per ratio, or percentage of that individual group, so more vaxxed people are catching Covid as a percentage of those vaxxed.
What you are describing is a drug trial. These did not go through that.
Could it be that lots of the remaining unvaccinated are just very healthy people? And they don't want unknown chemicals in their bodies? So they would be the ones eating very healthy, exercising daily, have low BMI + good muscle mass (athletes), have high HRV score, they normally dont catch colds or flu because of their diet & lifestyle. And when they do go somewhere its to some outside activity like hiking or the beach, etc. Maybe they are not the ones sitting in a crowded theater eating popcorn & candy & drinking soda. Because they never ever touch that stuff. They are the ones doing keto and/or carnivore.
I would like to see the HRV scores of the fully vaccinated who got sick. What is their BMI? What is their diet? Do they have metabolic disease? How much exercise do they get a day? Are they able to do a half marathon walking or do they think walking 1 block is a huge distance? What is the body fat percentage?
I have also read that having allergies is actually protective against the virus. It could be that when you have allergies they make your innate immune system stronger? More "trigger happy" so it's always on guard? I would think that many people who have strong allergies to various things would be very hesitant to get the vaccine because the likely hood of a bad reaction goes up.
And what if you combine healthy diet & lifestyle with the allergies? That is the situation I am in. I can't even be around a simple air freshener as my face swells up & gets all red with burning throat. React to lots of common things. But my HRV is generally in the 70s & 80s. And next month I will be 50. 0 meds. My blood pressure at the doc was 106/62.
So I would like to see the actual stats on these vaccinated people.
Here in England there hasn't been any real vaccine apartheid (yet). Vaccinated and unvaccinated are still mixing socially.
Unless you want to go to a nightclub.... Or a footie match...?
There isn't in the US outside of a handful of major cities which are trying to push it. The majority of the US is life as normal.
It’s coming don’t worry
Japans rates dropped like the 29 stock market TEN DAYS AFTER ALLOWING IVERMECTIN. The chart is BREATHTAKING.
7:04 in the high risk ages 50+, i do find it curious that the deaths recorded in the unvaccinated all center around 108 plus/minus 8 with a bump to 161 in the highest risk 80+ age group, but in the vaccinated the number of deaths essentially doubles or worse for each age group. i would anticipate there might have been more correlation there?
The number of infections among vaccinated and unvaccinated actually follows the real life ratio of vaccination. If you check the CORRELATION, you will see, that it is almost ZERO.
Conclusion: the vaccines reduces the symptoms, but has literally ZERO effect on becoming infected.
Risk of serious disease and death doubles every 7 yrs, so age the biggest risk factor for death as demonstrated by Spiegelhalter last year 2020.
Thanks Dr Raszek much appreciated 👍
Scary thought--the jab is doing exactly what it was designed to do and a lot of people drank the kool-aid
Well, it's a mixed bag if we look at it unbiased. On one hand, those who took the jab are protected from the more severe effects of the disease, especially the elderly. On the other hand, in the general populous it has actually increased infection rates. But this has also given the authoritarian media and politicians to push lockdowns further and longer as they only focus on infection rates, not mortalities.
Which, like you said, might mean the jab is doing exactly what it was supposed to... to spread a low impact disease as far and wide as possible to justify the pharma product and political tyranny...
@@Keys879 The lockdowns are economic warfare like embargos. Countries that can't leave and trade have financial issues. This whole thing stinks, it is either evil or being used for evil purposes.
@@Keys879 I agree with your first point - the vaccines protect the vulnerable. I can't fully agree with the rest.
The reason we see more vaccinated folk infected is simply because there are more vaccinated than unvaccinated. There will be additional reasons too - the vaccinated may feel protected and let their guard down, those exposed to far higher risk of catching the virus in their job (teachers, doctors, nurses etc. will be vacvinated (it can't stop you getting it, it just helps you fight it off better) and early doors - their antibodies may be waning now.
It's easy to lookfor and think you have found evil but yoj need to keep an open mind and review all evidence without bias.
@@thebrowns5337 As per he UK data in this video, there are only ~130 deaths in 1,000,000 for the most critical age group (70-80). That is paltry. Almost nothing. We destroyed global economies, stripped rights, divided the populations, encouraged tyrannical behavior, and attempted to enforce an experimental treatment that previously failed its clinical trials over the past ten years. Who's own manufacturers aren't held liable for any damages to those who take it and who also won't release collected data on side-effects for their products. Covered for by a media that largely misrepresents and hides information to maintain the status quo narrative.
Cases do not equal deaths. How many people do you know who've died? Don't answer me, because it's far too easy for you to lie to try and save face on the internet. Just consider it to yourself.
During the Black Plague the dead lined the streets. This never happened with this disease. Globally averaged its somewhere around a 1% mortality and remember, in many countries they were putting down car accident victims as C19 deaths.
It's not hard to see the evil, you don't even have to search. Its plain as day.
@@Keys879 idk anyone that died that is the truth. 2 people I know was on a vent ( there big tho. A few people at work had it twice ( there not vaxed) second time was easier than the first time. Interesting huh.
I am a 50+ female who is unvaccinated and have had no symptoms at all and not even taken a pcr or a lateral flow test.
In Ontario , Canada , the ratio of breakthrough cases of double vaccinated to single vaccinated is around 15 : 1 . How is that possible ?
Because the jabs don't work and are only being administered to harm and kill people 🤷🏾♂️.
Sorry not sorry
Because it's labeled as vax but you have not questioned what's really in the syringe.
Because single vaccinated people are Numerically very minority. People usually are either 2jab vaxxed, or unvaxxed.
@@sevenn7pure and it's not a real vaccine.
@@jdt8082 correct they are gene therapies. They work quite different than vaccines.
Great information thanks.
Three things:
1. How can you say almost 100% of UK population has antibodies when those results are only from blood donations or tests? Has every person in the UK had an antibody test?
2. I agree ADE should be studied. Which pharma company is going to put their hand up to do that?
3. How about TREATING people that get covid instead of waiting till they have to go to hospital and by then the damage is done?
I’m sick to the back teeth of hearing that the only solution to this virus is vaccines, lockdowns, masks and quarantine.
Apologies for the rant.
There has been a concerted effort to suppress therapeutics. It is sinister. I wonder, after that Indian news network reported the strong arm, bully contract conditions Pfizer demands to provide countries the vaccine, if part of those contracts require the active discouraging of therapeutics. Cuz they could depress vax demand - SALES.
I second the question about 100 percent of pop having antibodies, how can this be?
Week 42 update from UKHSA: “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” (Page 23)
So vaccination interferes with adaptive immune response, and inhibits broad 'natural immunity'. Agree?
Yes saw that. I wondered about that too, and my first thought was that perhaps lower anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels are seen precisely due to enhanced protection from vaccinal antibodies? Virus could be cleared faster than in non-vaccinated individuals? Thoughts? So I am not sure if this is due to inhibition of natural immunity per se.
Yes this is concerning and might explain that I’m noticing my vaccinated colleagues taking longer to clear and suffering with worse colds than my unvaccinated colleagues with the same infections.
@@sutters7251 we definitely will need data on this but in the meantime, very interesting observation. It goes along with Dr. Bossche's theory of suppressing the innate immunity, but his theories are not considered seriously by other scientists. Certainly educational though.
Could this be linked to the recent Swedish publication that mRNA actually interferes with our gene function (at least in the petri dish). ? Is there any data breakdown between the different types of vaccine used in the UK ?
I will never be mandated to take a medical treatment but I was pro covid vaccine at first. The information coming out about this vaccine is getting worse as we go. We found quickly that the vaccine did not give immunity. But it was showed it still helped. As we keep going we continue to find that the benefits of the vaccine continues to drop.
6:45 true. But considering the micro numbers per million isn't this more about splitting hairs than it is about saving lives and about the destruction of people's lives?
Good video supported with data. The Hope and Desire that the vaccines do what was proposed is being held so close that many are unwilling to see the facts to the contrary
I live in Florida and have noticed first hand that there was a high percentage of fully vaccinated people getting Covid. Fully vaccinated people that I personally know were getting Covid at about the same rate as unvaccinated people when the Delta variant was peaking here.
Congrats on 100k subs Merogenomics!
I think there is a lot of dirty data in these numbers. Hospital data collection bias with the fear and discrimination now in play.
In the last week, two ppl i know had severe reactions after the jab, one died
I’d like to know how their testing for antibodies , my understanding is getting a quantitive essay is expensive, I don’t imagine they’re doing that on everyone?
It would be great to develop the screening tool that is none invasive - like breath/saliva checks for markers specific to the viral infections. And again, for those healthy and strong, getting infection is the best way of getting immunity for themselves and also for the rest of the population. Let's not forget that the nature of the virus is not to kill the host, but to propagate itself successfully throughout the time. So each generation of the virus is less and less aggressive. That's the only way for it to survive: coexistence with the hosts
You make a very good point which is too often ignored. Based on how organisms evolve, the best chance of survival for the organism is to be minimally invasive, certainly non-lethal, but easily transmitted between hosts.
Great video. Since this was made, the UK have decided that rates per 100,000 is not a good way to compare. This is because the rates in the vaccinated was rising rapidly!
When it comes to these figures, the government use these rates to show there are more unvaccinated in hospitals. This is completely misleading, as the actual majority of beds in use are from the double vaccinated, around 80% at week 45.
Damn. No side taken. What we want to hear💯
Thank you for this information. It’s very validating for those with natural exposure antibodies who are resisting vaccination. I just want to wait to see long term results (and so far they are somewhat disturbing), and should be a part of society while I do so as there is so much evidence that splitting the population has been so faulty.
Herd immunity is not where "everyone" has antibodies against the virus. Depending on a number of factors, primarily rate of transmissibility of the virus and effectiveness of immunity from blocking transmissions, around 50% immunes in the population may be sufficient to ensure a low probability of infection for a random unvaccinated person.
With regard so many in the UK having covid antibodies, this may not be as good as it appears. Vaccination/booster shots do not reliably block infection or transmission. It's like a big, wonderful boat with a hole in the bottom. It may still float, with some bailing, but it's not so big and wonderful as it appears. Vaccine protection wanes in all respects and thus does not well support a long term herd immunity.
This is not the case for natural immunity, gained from recovery from covid infection. Natural immunity is 100% efficacious against reinfection (regardless of variant) and also against transmission. It appears to be highly durable, likely lifelong. Thus, natural immunity does very well support long term herd immunity and in fact will lead to zero covid over time because natural immunes kill the virus. What could prevent reaching zero covid in this manner? Vaccines that prevent infection and thereby obviate natural immunity. If you want to rely on vaccine protection you will have to expect periodic, frequent jabs, and you will live with the constant fear of some new mutation that sidesteps the vaccines. I do not find this acceptable and I don't understand how anyone could.
Bottom line, if the extended UK covid prevalence is based primarily on vaccinations, then in a few months, after vaccine immunity wanes, this protection will simply disappear and a new spike in cases may develop. Which could be good, because at present, the only real, durable protection from covid is recovery from infection; moreover, we are much better now at treating covid so a case of covid should not be viewed as reason to update your will. (Snark here is probably inappropriate; my apologies, please.)
Finally, there has always been a fear that the vaccines may actually "step on" natural immunity, but at present there is no empirical sign of this. The tell-tale symptom would be reinfections, which we are still not seeing. The continued absence of such indicates that natural immunity is not so easily messed with.
Thank you for such amazing post! Only possible contention is that natural immunity is 100%, as reinfection clearly occur in those who were previously infected. But it seems there is a gradient to natural immunity protection based on the severity of previous infection? Any thoughts on that? What you seem to be describing is what we could have expected in natural pandemic progression and we are obviously past that. Interesting comment also on possibility of everyone having antibodies as a potential issue. We would agree if it contributes to immune escape if those with antibodies continue to be infected. But if new more dangerous variants emerge, wouldn't everyone be negatively affected, including those with natural post infection immunity and innate immunity?
@@Merogenomics There are no reinfections. You can easily disprove this to me by naming even one counter-example. Understand that reinfection is not just two positive test results. False positives are actually not uncommon. Typically, the first test is a false positive following a cold or flu episode which presents similarly. The patient often never bothers to follow up so he/she doesn't know it's a false positive for covid. Several months later he/she might contract actual covid, so now he thinks he's been reinfected. Not so.
According to the Worldometer there have been 220M recoveries from covid infection. Each of these will of course result in natural immunity. If there was a reinfection rate of, say, 1%, that would equate to 2.2M reinfections worldwide. So, it should be an easy matter to name one. To put this in perspective, suppose I was to ask, are there breakthrough infections following full vaccination? Yes. Jen Psaki. I could name many others. So could you. Breakthrough infections certainly do occur.
So again I ask, name one credible example of reinfection. You should be able to rattle off several - given that simple math indicates that if reinfections do exist there must be millions of them. But you can't. Best you can do is say, I think I heard that one of the Kardashians...? No, please, no.
There aren't any reinfections. Even if you could find one claimed case that hasn't been disproven, that would just be the exception that proves the rule.
It's not just me saying this. Dr. Peter McCullough; Dr. Shankara Chetty (South Africa); Dr. Martin Kulldorff. Many others as well, although most will get squeamish about throwing around absolutes such as "none" or "never".
@@davidportwood233 thanks again for another amazing answer! What I like @ your responses is that you go into details and want to have a conversation as opposed to just trying to discredit someone. Good job! In terms of reinfections, I discuss these in two videos: ruclips.net/video/ZSJmTH68giY/видео.html and ruclips.net/video/1MIwcWF1dAs/видео.html and references are provided. BUT!!! Reinfections occur because not all starting infections will result in protective immunity I think. If it's a really mild infection, it might not be enough for a person to be protected next time around (but would be PCR positive)? That's actually the reason why I think that reinfections do not tell the complete picture at all, we should stratify them based on severity. Now with regards to PCR results, they should not be easily fooled by other viral infections as specific virus genome sequence is being targeted. With current high prevalence of infection, PCR positive results should be quite accurate (not necessarily so at the start of pandemic though and I explain it in this post: merogenomics.ca/blog/en/122/COVID-19-PCR-tests-are-we-over-testing-or-under-testing-Who-is-right). That's at least my understanding but I'm constantly learning new concepts with regards to this pandemic all the time. Again, thanks for awesome answer and please feel free to let me know your thoughts again.
@@Merogenomics I am neither a doctor nor a scientist of any stripe. Well, I have a little math background and I can make a relational database whistle Dixie while tap-dancing. The relational database, I mean. I can't tap-dance, either. I know less about medicine than I do about painting. I don't know enough about painting to make an ink thumbprint. I have been asked to attempt such on several occasions. However, I did take a high school biology course which left me secure in the knowledge that recovery from a virus leads to natural immunity which is robust and durable. And, said my old textbook, if I recall correctly, immunity is not parceled out as a matter of degree; you are either fully immune or you are not at all immune. If you were infected and recovered, you are fully immune. If you were not infected, you have no level of immunity.
Imagine my surprise then, when I started hearing offhand remarks about covid reinfection occurring just a few months after full recovery from infection. That was not supposed to happen. But hey, what do I know? I set it aside as imponderable by the likes of me.
Time passed and I began to observe that although vaccine breakthrough infections were deemed "extremely rare" they were not only occurring but they had names attached. Names that I recognized. Natural immunity was occasionally mentioned as if it was a sugarless soft drink or a Lite beer. Often said directly but more often implied, was the idea that natural immunity was a weak knock-off next to vaccine immunity, hardly deserving of recognition let alone attention.
Attempting to resolve the discrepancy, I noticed as well that over time, vaccine breakthrough infections had begun piling up, always with names attached, but there was never a single case of reinfection mentioned. Not specifically, anyway. No cases of reinfection with names attached. It occurred to me, as apparently it did no one else on Earth (which is why I get paid the Big Bucks), that this absence proved something empirically. I realize now that I wasn't the only one on Earth to have realized this, it was just a matter of the medical authorities + MSM censoring objections from people who might actually matter such that John Q Public (including myself) was not allowed to hear them.
That is finally changing, as vaccine breakthrough infections continue to accumulate and reinfections continue to make their absence known.
I can't argue theory with you. I just continue to point out that reinfections are still not occurring, when they should be occurring in the millions, if indeed they do happen at all.
@@davidportwood233 another great post! Enjoyed the humor too! Well, my way of understanding biology is that nothing is bulletproof. How strong of a protection you might obtain could be related to a degree of severity of disease. Same with antibodies. Some antibodies can actually work against you and promote subsequent infection (antibody dependent infection) and that has already been reported in some previous COVID-19 patients. So there will be many little things that together will make the picture very complicated. But overall I agree, why are we discounting natural infection benefits is at the moment beyond my understanding, thus for now I remain ignorant. 😉
Thank you for explaining the graphs and tables much appreciated 🙏
Perhaps those that are vaccinated have a higher % of comorbidities in their cohort as well . It seems likely that there is a significant percentage of the vaccinated population with conditions that severely diminish their bodies innate immune response and thus present with symptoms. Unvaccinated cohort also seems to have a disproportionate amount people who take a robust approach to health which may help prevent illness, and also may be willing to deal with symptoms personally should they arise.
Good point
The vaccinated definitely have a condition that diminishes their bodies innate immune response it’s call the vaccine
Hey Jules- that’s definitely a possibility! I just wanted to mention a potential additional cause to the unexpected variance in the study that the dr. didn’t mention in his video. Or perhaps I’m wrong. If we all arrive one step closer to the truth I’m happy in the end .
All the data is very soft, poorly collected, and selectively reported. All of these conversations are classic "garbage-in, garbage-out" situation, where we microanalyze data as if the data itself is rock solid, which it isn't.
Wait till people find out that the accine creates the problems that are seen with the accine, a scientific mistake. Do not inhibit ACE2!!!!! Canna-sapiens
Excellent presentation of very, very interesting and surprising data and facts. Thank you so much!
I am one of the 2% without antibodies, unvaccinated and have lived like a hermit for the last 10 years!
If you've had any contact with the human populous over the last 24 months, you probably do have them.
Sounds fun
Does the WHO have any issue with the experimental vaccines being used on a high percentage of the world's population. This leaves no ground for long term data/issues if anything bad happens from it. (long term). there needs to be a limit on trial vaccines per population. Otherwise there is no data from unvax compared to Vax. Trial vaccines should be for the vulnerable, also at the individuals choice.
Largest, unprecedented experiment ever perpetrated on humanity. Beyond reckless and unethical. Your points are spot on!
Thank you for a very balanced review. It makes me realize how fantastic the human immune system is. In my view, far superior to any band of scientists bumbling around in a laboratory. By the way, I used to be a scientist!
Did you lose faith?
I'm in the 30-39 group. According to these graphs, 10.1 people out of 100k unvaccinated people will be hospitalised and 0.4 unvaccinated people out of 100k will die. Let's look at that as percentages.
10.1 / 100 000 = 0.0101 %
0.4 / 100 000 = 0.000399999 %
THIS is what I'm supposed to be terrified of?!
Edit: Let's throw in the 80 + category for good measure.
74.8 / 100 000 = 0.074799999 %
121.1 / 100 000 = 0.121099999 %
Even if you're over 80 years old, you have a 0.1 % chance of dying when unvaccinated?!
Side note: Peculiar how more people die at 80+ than are hospitalized, no?
The hospitalization curves can indicate vaccinated feeling confident they're protected while still experiencing symptoms don't check in while fearful unvaxed will, regardless of severity of symptoms. I would like to see some study of ordinary flue incidence. How it is with normal seasonal prevalence that we aren't being bombarded with their advisories.
ruclips.net/video/tQ396mMRY_o/видео.html
@@kuroki-_-4909 Yeah, controlled trials are much more protected from letting selection bias skew them. And yes, in trials the vaccines greatly protect agaisnt getting infection. If everyone in a population were getting tested regularly this data would be more useful.
Very interesting. Thank you so much 🙏🙏🙏
Unstabbed and tested many times, yet - result. Take vit D, Zn.
Took Vitamin D n Zinc still got Delta was very ill hospitalized for 6weeks.Not even well yet.
Interesting.... I live in Canada, and in my province I think more vaccinated people are hospitalized vs unvaccinated. 😳
Just started watching your vids. Great.
Do you have similar type data for Canada?
Yes we do video update 13.
7:30 how much is that comparing to other diseases in the meantime? Can we see a chart together comparing other diseases for these groups and why there is no such rush and urgent treatment for all other diseases?
It could also be that vaccinated people were feeling protected and did more social activities with less care for germ control.
prophylaxis? You are implying that these people aren't safe even with the vaccine what is the point then
@@johanvandermerwe7687 The vax was to lessen the severe damages ONLY.
@@johanvandermerwe7687 Well the vaccine reduces the severity but doesn't prevent infection.
Yep! Watch Testimonies The Project. Here on YT. Thank you.
I think it's simply that a large part of those vaccinated had previously got covid and their immunity gives better protection.
On the other hand, the unvaccinate without immunity have a much higher chance of being hospidalized.
I feel the measuring the efficacy of a vaccine is difficult when the vaccinated and the unvaccinated populations have different acquired immunity,
and the result is that we are underestimating vaccine efficacy.
When I say a larte part of the unvaccinate must have previously contracted COVID comes from the antibody graph. If 98% of the population has some antibody protection (either vaccine or covid) but only 20% got Covid, there is little room for unvaccinated that never contracted Covid.
Why taint the blood of your child with a questionable vax when a childs chances of dying from lurgie are virtually zero anyway.?
I have a hard time taking an asymptomatic case as anything all that negative anyway. I suppose that describes most of the kids' cases. My understanding is that they don't spread it much either.
(extra comment): Based on what I'm seeing @11:28, the people who should consider the vaccine are those 60 and above. For 80+, you could make the case that it is very advisable given the risks and benefits. For those under 60 with no conditions that make covid worse, it seems to me that vaccines are a risk with very little benefit. That's the conclusion I would draw from these numbers.
I'm not seeing how other possible treatments that may or may not be used after Covid is diagnosed figure in to the numbers. It looks like not at all, so it's not a complete picture of what is best to do anyway.
What have the elderly do to you?
asymptomatic spread it 2:5 what are you going on about?
Kids dont spread it to adults? HUH?
The other "treatments" like the antiviral pils prevent the virus from multiplying and do not give you antibodies like the vaccine does.
@@derekmoore8224 I didn't say it here, but I have had the position in other comments that I think the elderly (especially 70+) should strongly consider these vaccinations since they are indeed at high risk from Covid. But nobody should be forced.
@@pandorachild Your perspective here, similar to that of millions of other Americans, represents a radical new way of viewing disease that is not compatible with human freedom as we have known it. There will never be an end to lockdowns or compulsory/coerced vaccines/new medicines. So no, I'm not on board. People need to make medical decisions based on their own needs, not the collective.
@@pandorachild To continue the thought, I am not opposed to public health in principle, but within reasonable limits and with the understanding that total disease control comes at way to high of a price.
Another excellent overview ! Unbiased and insightful.
8:45 : I believe there's a 3rd reasonable hypothesis to consider, which is that unvaccinated people are naturally more cautious when it comes to hygiene, because most of them are aware they are subject to a higher death probability if they actually get infected. The combination of your 1st hypothesis with this one is even stronger to explain those results.
Actually no, from my experience not being vaxxed I just go do everything like I would if COVID wasn’t a thing. Only wear mask when forced, only wash my hands when I get home. I even smoked a joint with my friend last week who was very sick, maybe even COVID but guess what? I’m not even sick cuz yuno what instead of taking this bs vaccine instead I just started eating healthier to boost my immune system
I could see that, I am 67 and did not take the jab so I just mostly stay away from people. Kids and ex wife are 600 miles away. I am retired so I don't have to mingle with people plus like the other guy said work on getting as healthy as possible with natural way.
You could be right but in my observations people un vaxed have moved on and will not be afraid of the virus and live as close to before as possible
*Great summary!Thank You .Unvaccinated are more educated and less prone to ADE than vaccinated ,I suppose that is the answer on Your question! *
Deaths from taking the jab should also be included in vaccinated deaths. Is it? If not those numbers would rise in every age group.
Why did you skip over page 22. This showed the rate of infection in younger people, which was much higher than older people?
Thank you 🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽
Always thank you back!
Reports from pharmacists say they are being told to allow dispensing of xpired product.
so the vacinated are driving the infection up. W.T.F.
Very good, balanced analysis, thanks for sharing
The reason there are more infections in the vaccinated is they represent a larger portion of the population group now. So if 80% of 50-59 year olds are vaccinated then they represent a much larger subset of the population compared with the 20% unvaccinated. So therefore there are many more vaccinated people that have various stages of waning immunity and therefore exposed. Moreover , natural immunity will be beginning to bring robust immunity to the unvaccinated group.
So even if we give this as true, we still know definitively there is no public good to forcing everyone to get vaccinated. It doesn't stop transmission or infection. It is a personal therapy and that's it. So, it should be a choice
@@roundpeg3239 Yeah, agree 100%. Adverse event triggers and long term effects not worth the risk if it is no longer effective after 3 months.
Within a month and a half January 2020-march 2020 only "a" covid virus is present,(pre vaccine roll out)simultaneously ,from england a "variant" is "discovered",thus rendering all covid vaccine useless.Its all made up mate,you should have been paying attention,most have.If you think %80 are vaccinated,i have some land in Florida to sell you.
@@darrininverarity4297 Made up for sure but add “in a lab.”
I understand but by using that excuse you're losing your ability to have a control model to compare it to, even a small one. The same can be said flipped: The reason country x has 80% of cases in hospital is because country x population is 80% unvaxxed.
What happened to the category "Second dose
Dr Raszek,at 13:26 when you explain the Gap in the data from where the vaccines came from - could this be called Herd Immunity “lite”? As in fact, Herd Immunity functions to corral the virus and extinguish it in a group whereas this vaccinated component of the graph does not delay or retard virus progress, but instead introduces the frank possibility (Maybe proved by the existence of Delta variant) ADE component. SO wouldn’t a better or perhaps necessary graph or dataset be for REINFECTIONS which presumably would be very low for the Previously infected vs High for the vaccinated? Have you come across this type of statistic on their (or any) government website?
Wow, what a question Jason! I never thought of that but that is a really good idea! To graph it as reinfection between vaccinated and versus naturally infected. I discuss that exact experiment in vaccines update video 12: ruclips.net/video/ZSJmTH68giY/видео.html
So at least we have first clues from the Israel data
👏👏👏👏👏👏 that’s what I think too
My cousin is a nurse & had to get the jab to stay employed. She’s had Covid TWICE since being vaccinated. Makes you think 🤔.
@@pipedreamer2u sooo before the Vax she Never had a problem?
Natural Immunity is fire breaker. They do more good to the society! I will hire them in a heartbeat
The problem is that way too many vaccinated get hospitalized and die. There is no way to determine the success of the vaccine without knowing if someone was actually exposed and their vaccine worked.
And on the other side of the coin , in my experience, we had 7 family members unvaccinated catch it , nobody got very sick at all .
Thanks for the information 😷💉🦠🙏⚖️.
Here in the UK we are not segregating at all if unvaccinated.
There have been no restrictions for some months!
True for England and possibly NI, but both Scotland and Wales have had restrictions throughout the past 6 months, and Wales is introducing segregation of 2-dose vaccinated vs unvaccinated/1-dose from today, with total lockdown's threatened if that doesn't reduce cases.
Given that 2-dose population has more cases per 100k,...it would seem inevitable for Wales and Scotland to entire full lockdowns this winter.
I am in the UK so I thought I would clarify. There are no restrictions on movement, mask wearing, social distancing or vaccination status within the UK. The only restrictions are asked for by some hospitals and vets. We are mixing freely with each other since July 21, hence the high herd immunity.
I propose that vaccinated people are getting nasal and throat infections and not lung, hence the symptoms are mild.
Yes indeed.
also do you have any idea where they take the 'low confidence' numbers from about vaccines stopping transmission? This is such a vital point considering its beeing forced upon so many (young) people with major negative consequences involved (exclusion from society, loosing jobs etc) if one does not get vaccinated. I do not want to take it to protect myself but i might´if I can through that protect my older family etc. But if it doesnt do that i really dont want to have it :(
If not mistaken, the confidence intervals are expected to cover 95% likelihood that a value in this entire range is expected to be true. What these intervals tell you is where you can expect the realistic observation in a population to be. So it could be anywhere between these provided values. If the confidence interval is wide, it gets less informative, and it shows you that there was too much variation observed in a data, and could be due to small population sample. The sad part is that breakthrough cases are now so large anywhere you look that vaccination alone cannot guarantee at all for now that it will protect others from not being infected by the vaccinated person (we will see later on if that changes with another variant, or another additional treatment option like either boosters or some medications). Reduced chance, yes sure, but not a guarantee at all. So unfortunately for now the way I see it, if one wants to be absolutely sure they are not putting others at risk, is to test themselves.
Hi there , it's freedom of choice but me I'll never take any of these human trials on humanity , the first 2 jabs eliminate 75% of the persons Immune system so anyone that has had both jabs then they only have 25% left to fight infections or viruses , now you come to the boosters, the 1st booster contains 81 strains of foreign bacteria that your body has no idea what they are & the 2nd booster contains 8 strains of HIV , it takes 8 weeks for anyones body to produce new white blood cells as this is why the jabs are 8 weeks apart to hit the immune system again , once the people take the boosters then they will never be able to produce white blood cells again , white blood cells are your 1st line of defence to eliminate any virus or any infection, this is a bioweapon created in Wuhan by Fauci , why are people referring to these jabs as vaccines because this is in trials until 2023 , so it's trials , just saying
@@stanleystewart4880 I think ur going way to far with ur bullshit I dont trust the vaccine but I also think ur talking mega shit
@@gregorymailman9733 , i don't care what your opinion is & I'm quite surprised that people answer you back , as your very rude & my brother that died in 2020 in hospital here in Scotland & not from covid-19 either i know he died o high altitude sickness & died from a Thrombosis & not covid , this has effected so many millions around the world , so my advice to you is don't comment on things i post as if you can't be respectful towards people then it's a waste of time & if you have no self respect then how can you have respect for others , I'm not going to insult people like you do as all that happens is people go round in circles with no solution in sight , so you stay safe & mellow out & ingage with people in a respectful manner & you maybe surprised that people may answer you with the same respect , my energy is not wasted on people like , we have never met & me personally i wouldn't insult someone i know let alone insult someone I've never met , so you keep being a troll to get a reaction from people & thoughts like that you can leave me out of , you have a good life & try & settle down with your comments towards people & keep them to yourself
@@stanleystewart4880
Where re you getting that info though.
I thought the booster was more of the same stuff
The HIVgp120 spike is already in the vaccine that is how it gets in your cells but where is the info on it destroying your immune system I haven't seen that or that the booster aren't just more of the same stuff.
The graph is different from the table because they don’t know how to do math, how it’s possible when you have 203 total : unvaccinated 101, double doses 87 and when you look at per 100000 vaccinated 2.1 and unvaccinated 8.2🤣🤣 but when you enter the number in the graph he can’t cheat😁😁
Well, if most people are vaccinated in a population wouldn't you expect that group to have the most infection cases? I think a better number would be the ratio of breakthrough cases to the total number vaccinated and same with the unvaccinated.
in England we can go anywhere btw - medicated or not so hypothesis #1 is to be forgotten, #2 is more likely and what many of us believed from day dot and why there is such a strong argument against the medication from many of us
How do they know The % of people with antibodies who haven't been vacinated?
Nice analysis 🧐
Patient : " doctor , I have a mild headache !
Doctor : " we should do lobotamy right away !
Going backwards...exactly!
Take some Oxy and get hooked.
Dr. Raszek, could you please do a video/investigation on whether there is any connection between blood type and propensity of infection? Is there any connection?
I’ve tried to share the gov.health England technical notice 22 variants of concern report. This keeps getting removed so this info is obviously something that ‘they’ don’t want seen. Page 22. Last table bottom line shows 💀 from delta for vaccinated is 1091 compared with 536 unvaccinated. How should we interpret this data? Have you got content on any other site such as Odysee?
Currently only use RUclips and post articles on my blog: merogenomics.ca/blog/ I'm ok with whatever RUclips algorithms are doing. I'm hoping it's in good conscience. Yes, we have seen the COVID-19 deaths trends in the UK for long time now (UK posts amazing weekly reports, top quality, they also are incredible in tracking viral strains - just amazing quality science, but UK is one of the best nations in the world that adopted the power of genomics, our main interest). Believe it was discussed in this video: ruclips.net/video/mGAkV1G5CkU/видео.html Just checked the latest report this morning, and this trend continues. The Delta and Delta+ doesn't seem to discriminate much 😥 Let's hope this even soon
And yes, people who comment have really great content, are kind even when they disagree, so we're glad so far it's been such high quality interaction
What is the difference between "Symptomatic disease" and "Infection" ?
Backed up by actual documents! 👍 Great video & useful info. I shared your video with someone I know who’s currently fighting against Biden’s mandate. Let’s Go Brandon!
Another possibility for why more vaccinated people are getting covid than unvaxxed is this:
It is well established (but largely ignored) that diet, exercise, and obesity play enormous roles in susceptibility to covid. (Yes, you can find athletes who have died from it, but they are exceptions.) People who are in poorer physical condition are probably more likely to depend on the Vax than those who are in good health and eat an immune-healthy diet. So they catch covid more easily, whether they are vaxxed or not.
Wait... you mean health matters? Wow, the news never said anything about this mysterious condition.
I have one question about this data doctor and i wish to know your opinion on this.
In the statistics of unvaccinated people ending up in hospital ( 6:30 ) , how many of those unvaccinated people ending up in hospital could be having comorbidities causing them to not be able to get vaccinated and also causing them to be at higher risk to get hospitalized...
This would inflate these numbers of unvaccinated people getting hospitalized and thus not be representative for the entire group of unvaccinated people?
In the vaccinated group this will not happen because people are screened for known health issues causing possible problems in conjunction with the vaccination before getting vaccinated.
Given that the backlog of patient appointments is now well over 3.5 million due to all the delays caused by how the NHS has failed to keep pace with 'normal' health issues, it's likely that many more severely ill people are hitting hospitals with Covid in addition to their comorbidity, or catching covid while in hospital for those non-covid related illnesses.
UK has had 75,000 deaths 'at home' above the norm due to the failure of the health service to prioritise resources,...in some age groups that NHS/Political failure alone is a bigger killer than covid-19.
It’s really difficult to know who to believe, everyone wants to tell a story. I still feel that investment in the NHS would have been a better long term spend than furlough.
Both wrong and the NHS have had so many billion thrown in. Management is the key . The waste is unbelievable.
Thank you for this video. I think people who had their first jab shoudn't be put in the group of the unvaccinated. Are there more specific data that show how the difference between unvaccinated and the persons between their first jab and two weeks after their second one is?
Can't get the graphs they want if they don't fudge the numbers
Yes, this happens in other vaccine “ research”. If researchers put people who have had a covid vaccine as not being vaccinated then they are liars and the so called research is not just worthless but actually giving the opposite message so is worse than no data at all.
In France very shortly even two vaccines will mean for many they are in the same group as the non-vaccinated and their vaccine passes will automatically be erased.
My presupposition, from a human behavioral perspective, is that people who have been vaccinated may ignore guidelines suggesting they have a high likelihood of infection and transmission (I.e. by going to concerts and other public settings) and due to the immune response minimizing symptoms, may even ignore symptoms and continue to spread covid.
It is the logical behavioral outcome of changing guidelines for a population that is primarily protected from severe disease.
(i.o.w I think vaccinated people are less afraid of transmission)
I makes sense. I cringed when my sister told me that, after she got the vaccine, she went and visited my 95 year old grandmother. I'm amazed at what people think the vaccine does vs what it actually does.