@MarkVO I think it's clear to you and I. I more made this video so I could link it back into the replies so they can see how it works and understand the benefits.
What I understood here is that, the hardware can be controlled by both 'hardware-controler plugin' as well as the 'hardware-emulation plugin', whereas the 'hardware-controler plugin' doesn't have any audio processing in itself except the ability to control the hardware along with writing its automation natively in the box. But the latter is not only has the capabilities of controlling the hardware but also can process the sound just like any hardware emulation plugins. I hope I got it right. Thanks for a great video. Wish you Merry Christmas and Blessed New Year 2025. Many Blessings.
@ABS_AD77 yes correct. Just gives you an extra option to control the plugin emulation using the hardware. When using the plugin you get the feeling as if you are using hardware. You could in theory trick the mind to think you are working with hardware.
Hi and happy christmas. I like new ideas and this one might work but I think we got to go further by asking manufacturers an universal-and not proprietary - control protocol on the hardware like HUI, EUCON etc. to control every plug in.
First, I love your, videos, now I comment on my opinion on this topic: it would be great, the idea sounds interesting; but, in my case, I bought that bettrermaker PA plugin, and if I compare it with my eq. pultec type on hardware (from another brand, not bettermaker), I don't like the PA plugin at all. As we talk about audio, I would have to hear the difference between the bettermaker or the HW that is vs the Sw version, otherwise, it's just another promise,... I hope it's possible, I would love to, but I would have to hear it first,...
@patricioandres2562 I think any plugin you compare to analogue, the hardware is always going to sound better. We are always going to prefer to use the hardware. For me it's not of high benefit. But for someone with a limited number of hardware units it'll be an interesting concept for them. I will do this comparison video for you next week. It's one I'm interested in comparing.
@joshd265 very simple. And if a product like this already has a plugin emulation and a digitally recallable piece of hardware it definitely something to consider.
@@AudioAnimalsStudioyeah I'd actually thought about this a while ago also. Would be v useful to be able to work on something on the go with the plugin, then connect at the studio and have analog injected into your mix
I think a lot of people genuinely weren't listening because your original video was clear. It's a great concept. Hopefully device makers catch on.
@MarkVO I think it's clear to you and I. I more made this video so I could link it back into the replies so they can see how it works and understand the benefits.
Merry Christmas Paul. Looking forward to more great videos next year 😊
@tommysa3atf714 merry Christmas.
I understood from the 1st video on subject
@mrmorpheus9707 yeah most people got it. Some found it difficult to understand judging by the comments.
Merry Christmas Paul - thanks for another great year of videos.
Merry Christmas
What I understood here is that, the hardware can be controlled by both 'hardware-controler plugin' as well as the 'hardware-emulation plugin', whereas the 'hardware-controler plugin' doesn't have any audio processing in itself except the ability to control the hardware along with writing its automation natively in the box. But the latter is not only has the capabilities of controlling the hardware but also can process the sound just like any hardware emulation plugins. I hope I got it right. Thanks for a great video.
Wish you Merry Christmas and Blessed New Year 2025.
Many Blessings.
@ABS_AD77 yes correct. Just gives you an extra option to control the plugin emulation using the hardware. When using the plugin you get the feeling as if you are using hardware. You could in theory trick the mind to think you are working with hardware.
Hi and happy christmas. I like new ideas and this one might work but I think we got to go further by asking manufacturers an universal-and not proprietary - control protocol on the hardware like HUI, EUCON etc. to control every plug in.
@MrFlying7 merry Christmas. We have that in the Avid S4 and S6 plus other controllers. A more affordable option would be great.
@ indeed !
Fusion II and Bob's your uncle. Merry Christmas.
@@dahlbaker this is my prediction for 2025
First, I love your, videos, now I comment on my opinion on this topic: it would be great, the idea sounds interesting; but, in my case, I bought that bettrermaker PA plugin, and if I compare it with my eq. pultec type on hardware (from another brand, not bettermaker), I don't like the PA plugin at all. As we talk about audio, I would have to hear the difference between the bettermaker or the HW that is vs the Sw version, otherwise, it's just another promise,... I hope it's possible, I would love to, but I would have to hear it first,...
@patricioandres2562 I think any plugin you compare to analogue, the hardware is always going to sound better. We are always going to prefer to use the hardware. For me it's not of high benefit. But for someone with a limited number of hardware units it'll be an interesting concept for them.
I will do this comparison video for you next week. It's one I'm interested in comparing.
Kinda simple - hardware manufacturers just need to make a plugin model of their gear that can be used independently of the hardware
@joshd265 very simple. And if a product like this already has a plugin emulation and a digitally recallable piece of hardware it definitely something to consider.
@@AudioAnimalsStudioyeah I'd actually thought about this a while ago also. Would be v useful to be able to work on something on the go with the plugin, then connect at the studio and have analog injected into your mix
@joshd265 There's scope for it to go further. Can be developed even more useful.