Correction needed in the video. The difference between f 2.8 and f4 is ONE stop not two I have both the RF 70-200mm zoom lens (f2.8L & f4) and in 95% of the time you could not tell the difference between the two and build quality is identical.
The RF cameras can be stopped way down to compensate an RF f/4 lens so a 2.8 won’t make much difference. I have the R6 and it handles perfectly in low light shots.
Not as limiting as you might think due to the excellent high ISO that the R5/R6 can go up to. I use the RF 24-105 and it rarely comes off even in low light, bump up to 1600 or 3200 ISO and carry on.
Correction needed in the video. The difference between f 2.8 and f4 is ONE stop not two
I have both the RF 70-200mm zoom lens (f2.8L & f4) and in 95% of the time you could not tell the difference between the two and build quality is identical.
Great info. Thank you for the comment!
Thank you for this detailed look at this lens, been expanding my lenses for my Canon R5C and this is the next one!
I Think This Is Going To Be My next Lens! 😊
The RF cameras can be stopped way down to compensate an RF f/4 lens so a 2.8 won’t make much difference. I have the R6 and it handles perfectly in low light shots.
Eh?
so RF 70-200 F2.8 is better than EF 70-200 F2.8 III is better than RF 70-200 F4 ? is it correct?
Not as limiting as you might think due to the excellent high ISO that the R5/R6 can go up to. I use the RF 24-105 and it rarely comes off even in low light, bump up to 1600 or 3200 ISO and carry on.
2.8 - 4 is ONE stop of light, not two.