Great vid! Because you seem to be the person most willing to try out-of-the-box stuff, I think it would be interesting to get an understanding of what micro-meteorites (maybe BB sized?) would do to armor. Maybe iron-nickel composition (fairly common in the solar system) or even Diamond. Been wanting to see that for years 🤞🏼. Anyway, love the channel!
@@ToastRepublic An aluminum alloy granule moving at orbital speeds hitting a solar cell or station/satellite wall would be an interesting simulation for sure!
Honestly only a few hours for all 3, and I don't have crazy specs, R5 5600x and 3060, if I had the pro version instead of the student version, it would allow me to use all of my CPU, so it would be faster.
even in ansys student you could turn the resolution of the meshes up quite a bit. when you do very low resolution especially if the resolution of the 2 objects are different sizes the interaction of them and the penetration will be very innacurate.
Remember that formula of kinetic energy uses speed squared, so 5 km/s is 25 times more energy than 1 km/s, and 10 km/s is 100 times more energy than 1 km/s
I suppose an explosion is to be expected at ~29x the speed of sound at sea level. If only you could simulate the atmosphere ripping the I beam apart before it can reach its target.
Could you test an air-rifle round (steel pellet) against a T-60 at extremely high speeds (5,000m/s)? I would fin it interesting as it would likely simulate space debris.
10,000m/s definitely beyond this model both would explode in plasma much like the hypervelocity testing, provided the I beam survived the fireball to get there. Interesting none the less.
Does Ansys handle thermal expansion and phase change and stuff? I'd think you're going to be getting hella air friction at 5 km/s so it would be that much more destructive than what's already shown.
Plz make next cone round (note sharp nose, with funnel at front) vs angle armour like this. I think maybe it will turn at the time of impact towards to the armour, not away from it But of course harden steel or tungsten alloy/or carbide, like normal raunds😁
You seem to be using the structural steel material data that ansys has for these simulations as a standard. I‘ve done simulations with this material as well und just like your simulation, I only got insanly inacurate results. This material lacks certain parameter that are needed to accuratly simulate deformation. Try using the materials out of the explicit materials library, some of them seem to already have the needed data for these simulations, while others like the rha needs to be modified as it still behaves completely inacurate. I believe the parameters you need to add are those of the johnson cook model which you can add when you look at the properties of a material. However, I find to hard to find the values for the parameters but maybe you‘ll have more luck.
Lightspeed will result in infinite mass for any given resting mass. But you might enjoy the fact that a 168 grain projectile traveling at 99.99999999999986% c will have a relativistic mass of 189t or one Maus.
@@johncee853 Good to hear. Since we have now established the upper mass boundary of our projectile, we shall proceed by specifying the methodology. Hitting things that have mass with things that can travel at lightspeed and observing the result is called "looking at stuff".
@@u_u4640 That's exactly what you do, no matter how scientific you want to make it sound...you f**king observe. Top marks for being a googling expert a$$hole though. Far too many of you know-it-all keyboard warriors here.
In my experience, these simulations are fairly accurate when your are doing reasonable things, but an I-beam at 10,000 m/s is not reasonable, so I'm sure the majority of damage is exaggerated, then again I don't have the ability to test an I-beam going 10Km/s in real life to confirm that. Its all for entertainment anyways.
Well its a shitload more kinetic energy in that brick. Kinetic energy is 1/2*m*v², so the speed is squared. So instead of 5 times the kinetic energy you get 25 times the energy
10,000 m/s looked like a .308 hitting a block of clay.
What about a rod of god @ 1 Half light speed
I mean, at these speeds it treats any metal like liquid almost
@@captain1334 ansys doesn't like significant portions of the speed of light
@@CoreStarter maybe it will with a few modifications
We penetrated their armor
Great vid! Because you seem to be the person most willing to try out-of-the-box stuff, I think it would be interesting to get an understanding of what micro-meteorites (maybe BB sized?) would do to armor. Maybe iron-nickel composition (fairly common in the solar system) or even Diamond. Been wanting to see that for years 🤞🏼. Anyway, love the channel!
Thank you for the kind words, it's something I'll look into and I might give a shot, because that sounds interesting.
Hate it when I'm trying to defend the ring space and my battlegroup gets showered with micrometeorites and crippled.
@@みどり404 tfw torps come from inside the ring space
@@ToastRepublic An aluminum alloy granule moving at orbital speeds hitting a solar cell or station/satellite wall would be an interesting simulation for sure!
I've a feeling the sheer noise from the first one would kill the crew, or at least severely incapacitate them
secret weaponry of glaggleland
I've always wondered what these would look like in real time
How much did it take you to render this and using what system specs?
Honestly only a few hours for all 3, and I don't have crazy specs, R5 5600x and 3060, if I had the pro version instead of the student version, it would allow me to use all of my CPU, so it would be faster.
@@ToastRepublic pirate it :)
I like how the steel vaporiz3s into a cluster of high speed red particles
ah yes, the true solid shot shell
Day one of asking for: A kitchen knife made of Tungsten going 1000m/s vs t60 ufp
So you're to blame! You forgot to tell him to heat the knife first!
@@patrickradcliffe3837 ya
Well if you're doing ludicrous objects how about Sherman 75mm gun barrel?
Now how would we accelerate the I beam to 10km/s? Asking for a friend
How fast do you have to get an airsoft pellet going to make it through something like this?
Whats the mass of the I beam?
Is it possible to Model armor with different shapes but same volume of metal used? Like a grid pattern, a hedgehog pattern and such?
The largest bolt/nail/machine screw you can find vs tank armor?
even in ansys student you could turn the resolution of the meshes up quite a bit. when you do very low resolution especially if the resolution of the 2 objects are different sizes the interaction of them and the penetration will be very innacurate.
can you tell us how you make this?
It's Ansys Student, it's free and I have a tutorial on my channel if you're interested.
какие модули вы применяете для симуляции в Ansys на этапе проектирования в workbench?
What is the music you used?
*Is it Minecraft music playing in background?*
Yes, song is Alpha
How in the F did they get that onto a frame/chassis
I wonder what a sewing needle going 100,000 would do
Song?
Are these speeds even possible?
Remember that formula of kinetic energy uses speed squared, so 5 km/s is 25 times more energy than 1 km/s, and 10 km/s is 100 times more energy than 1 km/s
I suppose an explosion is to be expected at ~29x the speed of sound at sea level.
If only you could simulate the atmosphere ripping the I beam apart before it can reach its target.
Could you test an air-rifle round (steel pellet) against a T-60 at extremely high speeds (5,000m/s)? I would fin it interesting as it would likely simulate space debris.
what about the fastest 9mm bullet possible vs the thickest armour you got
LEAKED: Soviet APIB (armor piercing I beam) shell testing vs Maus
So, are we assuming that there is a gun that can fire an I-beam at close to/above orbital velocity? Or is this in space?
10,000m/s definitely beyond this model both would explode in plasma much like the hypervelocity testing, provided the I beam survived the fireball to get there.
Interesting none the less.
Does Ansys handle thermal expansion and phase change and stuff? I'd think you're going to be getting hella air friction at 5 km/s so it would be that much more destructive than what's already shown.
So basically anything going rail gun level of speeds will go through just about everything
A large icicle vs t72 ufp at 3,000 m/s or whatever speed it would take to pen
is these a minecraft music?
I have an idea, l3 vs 380mm shell
0:23
th…
that’s what…
T H A T S
W H A T
S H E
S A I D
0:30 the block got hit so hard it started to scream!
Here comes the A-Beam
A fruit cake at 10k per second. Varying the composition from fruit to tungsten?
The first hit made the I beam look like jello
Now do a 22. LR at 10000m/s vs Panzer 4 frontal hull armour
This is inaccurate. Real German Krupp Stahl would have not deformed in any way.!. 😂 Great Animation.
The Maus will never die !!!!
Tennis ball hitting maus at orbital velocity?
brick vs T 26
@10,000 m/s , yes sir
How to defeat the mighty Maus: Just throw a brick at it
So, basically a railgun?
day 3 of asking you to do a titanium peanut at 10,000 m/s vs front plates from MK.V landship or A7V
Plz make next cone round (note sharp nose, with funnel at front) vs angle armour like this.
I think maybe it will turn at the time of impact towards to the armour, not away from it
But of course harden steel or tungsten alloy/or carbide, like normal raunds😁
that i-beam got pissed
That was way cool man
Carp made out of tungsten going 10,000 m/s vs Tiger II UPF
Do a paper airplane at the speed of light vs. the maus hull front.
Golf Ball sized stony meteorite plz
golden pan (tf2) vs sherman side plate
Now that’s a rail gun lol
Its so weird see solid metal act like a liquid
What you like more chrismas cat or my cat pfp
I don't know
At 10000 m/s a fucking pencil would’ve penetrate a Maus proving that John Wick can kill tank
Turns out the I beam isn't so strong after all
Now all we need is some jet fuel
0:39 that's what she said
Anyway,, speeds like these make it clear why asteroids do such incredible damage. 10 km/s is slow for an asteroid.
The UNSC approves
0:39 that's what she said after an hour
10km/s you made it as rail gun ammo
a peach going 299,792,458 m/s vs P1000 ratte front plate
Don’t anger Andrew Carnegie
Do Iowa's 406mm gun, with it's APCBC at 2500 m/s and see what it does to a 1000mm plate
If that doesn't work, modify and use 406mm apfsds >:)
Thor's Hammer VS Sherman
Dab pen@ 4800 m/s vs apache titanium bathtub
who let the people playground player fight a maus with i-beams only?
You seem to be using the structural steel material data that ansys has for these simulations as a standard. I‘ve done simulations with this material as well und just like your simulation, I only got insanly inacurate results. This material lacks certain parameter that are needed to accuratly simulate deformation. Try using the materials out of the explicit materials library, some of them seem to already have the needed data for these simulations, while others like the rha needs to be modified as it still behaves completely inacurate. I believe the parameters you need to add are those of the johnson cook model which you can add when you look at the properties of a material. However, I find to hard to find the values for the parameters but maybe you‘ll have more luck.
Tungsten Reimu fumo vs Maus front plate
Do something vs a fridge
Titanium cube vs maus front plate
At 1000m/s
Toe vs wooden corner
30-06 Black tip ap at light speed vs Maus...dealers choice where you want to shoot it. 163-168 grain bullet.
Lightspeed will result in infinite mass for any given resting mass. But you might enjoy the fact that a 168 grain projectile traveling at 99.99999999999986% c will have a relativistic mass of 189t or one Maus.
@@u_u4640 I know how to use Google too. I don't expect him to do it, but you don't know if you don't ask...
@@johncee853 Good to hear. Since we have now established the upper mass boundary of our projectile, we shall proceed by specifying the methodology. Hitting things that have mass with things that can travel at lightspeed and observing the result is called "looking at stuff".
@@u_u4640 That's exactly what you do, no matter how scientific you want to make it sound...you f**king observe. Top marks for being a googling expert a$$hole though. Far too many of you know-it-all keyboard warriors here.
BESH vs M1A2 abrams
Speed kills
Same brick of metal at x5 the speed obliterates it, wth man. You sure that's metal? It's like you're throwing a brick in a pond.
In my experience, these simulations are fairly accurate when your are doing reasonable things, but an I-beam at 10,000 m/s is not reasonable, so I'm sure the majority of damage is exaggerated, then again I don't have the ability to test an I-beam going 10Km/s in real life to confirm that.
Its all for entertainment anyways.
Well its a shitload more kinetic energy in that brick. Kinetic energy is 1/2*m*v², so the speed is squared. So instead of 5 times the kinetic energy you get 25 times the energy
At preview post some days from today I think it was vide about pipe🤣
real RAILgun
👍🔥
'
try test outside in the field area with hard metal train railroad track vs maus...
not computer animation
Gbu-57 MOP vs top gun Maverick bunker
Hehe i beam go squish.
I-Beam = I wanna be a pancake!
It can be destroy with .45
Railgun
can of beans
a BB gun round 20,000 m/s through front plate pz.1
Rail gun fck yeah
Taking out n4zi tank
Day 1 of asking for .50 cal apfsds
Shatter plentiful
STOP THEY'RE ALREADY DEAD
t34 76 mm f34 gun vith br4??b vs panzer 4 f2s gun GAYjin says rusian one better at angled armours
go ohio flag
Now do a 22. LR at 10000m/s vs Panzer 4 frontal hull armour