⚖ What should we cover next? 🚀 Start saving with Rocket Money! legaleagle.link/rocketmoney 🦅 Get a great lawyer with EagleTeam legaleagle.link/eagleteam
Would like to know with how the partial treatment (protection from copyright and no real punishment for doxing when youtube has banned for even saying it as a joke) that sniper has been getting from youtube open up youtube for discrimination lawsuit for most people that have been banned for the same thing?
Wait this is a terrible video. I agree jackfilms got doxxed and sssniperwolf is terrible but your info is either outdated or just out right lying. 1) sssniperwolf isn't denying wrong doing. She publicly apologized 2) youtube did demonize sssniperwolf for an unknown set of time 3) jackfilms is being critized for being a bad actor by RUclips. Please do your research before making videos
The fact she went to his house, posted it to millions of ppl, and didn't apologize until she started to lose money herself speaks VOLUMES about her lack of care for other ppl's safety.
@@jonnym4670 Making videos about someone, and being critical of them, isn't obsession. And, like the previous commenter stated, even if that was so, that doesn't warrant SSSniperwolf's doxxing of Jacksfilms.
Her claiming that “she doesn’t know how to Dox someone” is like forcing a bank teller to give you money at gunpoint and then claim you have no idea how to rob banks.
RUclips didn't actually do anything. They gave her a temporary demonitization, but ONLY on new videos, not channel-wide, and they're willfully ignoring the fact that she's ban evading them by having a second, monetized channel where she's re-uploading demonitized videos.
I wouldn't be surprised if they gave her direction on the evasion. It reeks of a, "Hey, we gotta do something, so this is the minimum we can legally get away with, but here's what you can do..." response.
There's like two channels that say her SssniperWolf name on Rumble, and one of them have a couple of her videos on it. Not sure, if it's her channel, or if someone else is using her stage name.
RUclips's response to this is despicable ... both sides? A reminder there is a tier system based on how much money you make for RUclips. If this was a minor RUclipsr who did this ... instant deplatform for sure.
One big issue I have is not once has sssniperwolf said to her fans "Please don't do anything, please don't escalate the situation, what I did was wrong and it needs correcting"
@@mattbosco2178 no, never said "the only issue" I have many issues with what sssniperwolf did. I said it was oneof the bigger issues I have with howshe has handled this. Also FYI, there is lots of evidence, tweets from her and her sister, screen shots and the half assed apology by ssssniperwolf... you know.. the one saying she regrets what she did but doesn't actually fix anything. Saying "I'm sorry :( I feel sad" does nothing to fix the messshe made. fun thing, this can be used as evidence against her in the court case between her and sausage. she claimed his actions have damaged the channel - he will be able to use this as evidence as to its actually her that makes damaging and rash decision.
@@mattbosco2178 also love how most accounts speaking out in sssniperwolfs defence are blank husksand have nothing to suggest they are real also love how most are quite new accounts (about a year old) That or they all follow the same Business accounts (seriously, who subscribes to the nordVPN youtube account) btw, not saying you are a bot / paid account as if you where someone did a sloppy job😆
@@mattbosco2178 There is evidence. The photo of Jacksfilm's house is still out there on the internet. There are even screenshots of the post itself to show that it was SSSniperwolf who posted it.
That's a very one sided way to look at it. The statement was more "are you afraid to fight a small girl" to try and point out that he'd have no reason to be scared. It's like claiming you are scared of a chihuahua. Honestly, everyone in this story is unlikable. Jacksfilms, even if he thinks he has good intentions, is clearly profiting off her and she's just dreadful all around. Sometimes nobody is the good guy.
And he stayed in his house and cried lol. Imagine thats your husband? A little girl intimidated him. What a beta man child. Shes probably gonna leave him over this. Its hard to respect a man who is such a coward like that.
@@andrewshandle He was actually creating actual transformative content and working to find which creators Sniper stole from to credit them. Heck, he's even said that if she at the bare minimum would actually properly credit people she stole from, then he'd be done. What she was doing was still illegal at that point, but at least the creators would get some recognition.
"Nobody ever attacks the male react channels" Did she miss all the drama around the React Bros? Absolutely everyone rightfully came for them. This is what it looks like when someone weaponizes their minority status to play the victim.
@@russman3787They don't share the same power, privilege, and opportunities as men. Granted women aren't as much of a minority as they were back in the day and they're not a minority in the sense that they're in the minority but they're still technically a minority.
Still absolutely wild to me that she got the RUclips equivalent of a verbal warning. I wouldn't be surprised if literally anybody else got banned, sued, etc :/
They absolutely would too,just look at Act Man who jokingly said hed do it after QuantumTV wasn't punished and RUclips demonitized him for "threatening employees"
This. If she truly didn’t know, then it only absolves her from (some) intent, but she is still responsible for the consequences of her actions. Because she still ended up hurting him, and that should be obvious to her. Unfortunately, some people don’t care about the harm they cause to others, only that their reputation stays intact, so they try to justify their deplorable actions
@@strynevanzelk4944 a specific intent doesn’t mean that her intent has to be the doxxing it self. Doxxing by itself isn’t a crime (in most places) but it can constitute harassment and specially in this case, even incitement of violence. The intent it needs to have ( as in most criminal cases) is the intent to harm in any way.
@@strynevanzelk4944 Specific intent doesn't mean the intent must be to "break the law". For example, the crime of theft requires the intent to "deprive someone of their property". So, even if you truly didn't know theft was illegal, and thus had no intent to break the law, you still acted intentionally. A good rule of thumb is to consider whether it was an accident. Did SSSniperwolf reveal his address by accident? No? Then it was intentional.
Because passive-aggressively driving by a person’s house and posting it online in the middle of the night is the adult way of initiating an adult talk.
I love the fact jacksfilms was critisizing sniper wolf's overuse of reaction videos IN A REACTION VIDEO!!! They're both being extremely childish, but hey without them being childish we wouldn't get to watch the drama!
@@arbiters487Do you not get the point of satire? The whole point was to copy what she was doing for the point of poking fun, in which his content became transformative because of the massive subtext it caused. And even with that he was a) more transformative b) actively hunting down and crediting the creators she stole from. Especially with doxxing, you cannot say it's a "both" problem. You tubers have been SWAT-ed, assaulted, and harassed via their address. What she did put Jacksfilms in serious danger, all for critiquing her and her unethical buisness practices.
@@arthasmenethil5752 "Insanely ironic, considering how miserable and cowardy this JackFilm is." What were you expecting him to do? Get out of his house and break her face? He would have gone to jail.
@@arbiters487 "I love the fact jacksfilms was critisizing sniper wolf's overuse of reaction videos IN A REACTION VIDEO!!!" If that's your take away from his video, then you didn't understand the point of his videos.
As much as Lia likes to pretend she’s 15 years old, she’s 30. A grown woman with *a history of doxxing who has in the past complained about people showing up at her house uninvited. She’s not an idiot, she’s a lazy, selfish manipulator. This was 100% with malice. She knew exactly what she was doing, especially proven after her sister asked “why is Jack scared of a little girl? Doesn’t he know how to fight?” *changed from “criminal record” after learning her armed robbery and domestic charges were later dropped
She started in the *Call of Duty* sphere. If you remember the type of people who were involved with that era *coughKEEMSTARcough.* That should say all you need to know. ...But seriously how Keemstar hasn't been put behind bars or well... killed by someone baffles me.
@@tfkdandsvkcno, but she’s not a child. People like to frame her as being an innocent young woman who just doesn’t know better, when she is 30. She should know better than to do this.
As a woman myself, SSSniperwolf saying jacksfilms is only criticising her because she’s a woman and he’s just sexist and jealous is the most pitiful thing I’ve ever seen. Don’t use your identity as a scapegoat from taking criticism. It’s utterly embarrassing. The fact that THAT isn’t the worst low she’s stooped to is very telling of the deplorability of her character.
I hate it, it makes us all look bad! It's an insult to real victims of sexism. I agree, her and her sister have really aired out their inner personalities and dirty laundry for the entire world to see.
I find it funny that YT was perfectly happy to let her do her thing. All she had to do was ignore a troll. But she didn't ignore the troll (I say troll but he was calling her out for very valid reasons). If (subconsciously) she really thought he was just a troll and her content theft was justified, she wouldn't have reacted and she wouldn't have to turn comments off on every video today. If ignored, JJJacksfilms would eventually quit the bit. But she made it personal now, she fed the troll.
sssniperwolf isn't sorry at all, her apology is fake, she is also breaking the ToS of youtube by putting videos from her demonetized channel and putting them on a monetized 2nd channel
You can hear it plain as day. Totally disingenuous, she knew damn well exactly what she was doing and what her goal was. She also knew that nothing would happen. At least now we know that it's fair game to treat her in the same fashion.
@@GJameso You have to admit though, we would've never gotten the glorious AI version of Hasanabi singing that song if she didn't make that dumpster fire of a song.
It absolutely blows my mind that TheActMan gets banned for joking about doxing people on Twitter, but Sssniperwolf literally doxes someone and they don't do anything about it.
While yeah it's a blatant double standards, there's some things that need to be corrected: - actman joked about doxxing ytbe employees, which definitely got ytbe panicked. - actman channel didn't get banned, it got demonitized for a month, whereas sssniperwolf only got demonitized for a week. - fyi: actman even show his demonization to his friend who to an employee at ytbe, and he also thought this is crazy.
Maybe but Jack's problem is that he can't handle the fact that her "lazy" content is more appealing to people than the corny videos he puts so much effort in. He just can't deal with her being more successful financially than he is. That's why he went out of his way to get her demonetized. If he actually fear for his family's safety and believed she committed a crime he would have prioritized other avenues.
the fact that everyone who’s covered this story has blurred, censored, or just straight up not shown the house, says more about this situation than the law can
@@phoebea It's not a crime to call you a whole bunch of rude names, but if I were famous enough for people to report on my calling you names, and did call you names, you can bet most people reporting on it wouldn't call you the same names as part of their reporting. Something can be a dick move without being illegal.
@@thomassmith5696youtube covered for her and so far has proven that they're fine with doxxing as long as the one doing the doxxing makes enough money. It's the worst of the worst.
Leaking someone's address doesn't count as an invasion of their privacy??? If that's true then that is a very dangerous hole in the legal code. People have literally died from having their address leaked, with people swatting them or showing up at their house with a gun. Someone could make you unsafe in your own home and you would have no legal recourse.
Showing a picture of a house , precedent set by Streisand, is not "Invasion of Privacy". Doxxing, harrasment and stalking are still possible crimes. Consider, Burglary or Robbery, both crimes are "taking your stuff".
In a lot of states your address is part of your "public record" and can be accessed by just about anyone willing to look for it. In fact, we've all probably "doxxed" ourselves many times by posting pictures outside our home with our home in the background, or something similar.
@@Lurksmore I would argue to intent: The Streisand photographer was documenting coastline; something in public interest. Sniperwolf went there in a more 'mob' kind of way, half egging her followers on, implying something should happen to him.
Pulling up to someone’s house at night demanding they come out to talk is basically universally known as a call to fight. And she has a record of violent crimes.
That's a good point, She could be charged and considered to have violent intent. Also the stuff that has come out due to this, is just as damning as this
As someone who has been in many fights - ya'll are acting like babies. it's weak. I don't like her but I like him even less for being such a baby. he has been dissing her non-stop. Then he is surprised it escalates? I think many youtubers have had labotomies personally.
@@JezaJames "As someone who has been in lots of fights" so clearly you never learned to use your words like an adult, yet running around calling other people on the internet babies? Some people's kids, man.
Few things unmentioned/forgotten: -Sssniperwolf isn’t her first channel, just the most relevant -Sssniperwolf has a criminal record for disorderly conduct and armed robbery -RUclips gains a lot of revenue from her content theft and puts her on a pedestal frequently -By stating his address is easily findable online, she essentially encourages her devoted fans to find his address -Sssniperwolf also has a lot of unsavoury content resurfacing showing what is essentially sexual harassment involving minors -She currently has a secondary channel she is using to ban evade her demonitisation -Many people consider her “apology” to be AI generated
Not even consider it was tagged as 85% likely to be ChatGPT generated by a bot made to track if for school homework which is very accurate. Also it just doesn't sound like her at all. Especially if you remember her attacking the one porn star who looked like her.
the ai generated part IS mentioned in the video. on screen as you can see. you should delete that sentence from your comment. edit: ty for the likes. Also i guess he didnt make that very clear though.
I find it hard it hard to believe that she didn’t doxx without malicious intent. This is the same woman who would doxx one of her biggest ex-hater’s full name and slander him without genuine evidence.
That just proves how broken the system is. A person doesn't have to say "I'm going to hurt you" to have malicious intent. But they're just taken her words at face value and suffering very little consequences.
What I find the most frustrating is that all of this happened right as Jacksfilms' videos about Sssniperwolf were actually resulting in making a difference: small creators were submitting claims against her videos and she was being forced to remove the stolen content. And now that this has happened, Jack has stopped posting videos on Jjjacksfilms about her, and I'm worried that suddenly all the progress he was making for small creators to be able to fight back will be stopped in its tracks. And I'm guessing that fact isn't lost on Sssniperwolf either.
Jack's likely being dead silent right now because he's seeking legal advice. He might continue again down the line, but I wouldn't blame him if he doesn't.
I doubt it's a coincidence. The fact that people had finally managed to get meaningful action taken against her, rather than just words, was probably a factor in her choice to escalate the feud.
I noticed that too but didn't think to comment. I actually should have started this comment as 'You are right, and well done for your subtle and ironic sense of humour. Showing the ChatGPT prompt...." etc etc. Nice one.
But this situation doesn't deserve subtly. This whole video was frustrating because it has taken such a neutral stance - very similar to RUclips's absurd response to it all. She is so blatantly in the wrong here. It's not a joke to say that apology was written by an AI - because it so clearly was.
@@OhOkayThenLazySusan Well, he is a lawyer and wouldn’t want to give anyone cause to sue him. Devon generally tries to come at these things with a neutral perspective (a notable exception to this being one of his recent Trump videos where he stopped saying allegedly, because it had already been proven in court).
Bro what? That's insanely frustrating, but also unsurprising. People protect their own harder than anyone else. It's certainly a huge double standard though and tells you where the priority lies. Lia makes them enough money for her to be treated differently.
They eventually reinstated it on his channel but I’m sure that sssniperwolf’s ban won last that long and considering the fact that she’s already ban evading and making money off of another channel and YT has yet to take action against it…
Fun fact: @masteroogwgay just got demonetised permanently from RUclips for "stealing content", here we are with sssniperwolf not getting punished for doxing and literally stealing content.
I remember when Michael McCrudden did a Before They Were Famous on her. She acted so crappy about it (not as bad as PewdiPie did), it showed her true colors.
I'm going to come out and be as blunt as possible. SSSniper'wolf's ENTIRE internet personality is "she's hot". She's basically only famous for being "that one eye-candy reactor girl". I mean no disrespect to her for this. I am not saying that is all that she, as a person, is, I'm saying that this is the entire basis for her entire online fame. It certainly doesn't come from any actual effort, or quality of content, on her part.
RUclips is not really the best place anymore to report bad content creators who dox or threatened others with real intent. However they will gladly ban, remove your monetization, if you use a fair use video/image or even make a joke of how sensitive RUclips higher ups are.
Sadly both sssniperwolf and her sister have a history of this and and bullying/harassment, all the while being hypocrites. It was confirmed both were there.
For real. SSSniperWolf complained about being followed and harassed IRL, then doxes and harasses IRL. With the defense of: I'm just a dumb girl, I don't know what doxing is, you're defaming me, Jack!
That's what happens when you have no realistic perspective on the world. She's spent most of her time in fame surrounded by people that probably treat her like she's a god, like she can do no wrong. That's why she sounds like she stopped mentally developing when she was in her mid-teens.
SSSniperwolf says she “didn’t intend for this to happen.” UGH! SO tired of people using that for an excuse, when they are the ones that set things in motion. There’s a reason it’s called the thought “process.”
Also, she's acting out the dumb so hard, but she's got over 30 million subscribers on RUclips, and is chronically online. Doxxing is a BIG part of internet culture, there is exactly a 0% chance that she didn't know what was she doing when she interacts with internet culture ALL the time. She was mad that Jack took a jab at her and knowingly crossed an uncrossable line specifically to cause as much harm as possible.
“I don’t know how to use a gun!” Will soon be the new version of her “excuse” let’s not even talk about her outright stealing another creator’s full identity. INCLUDING THAT CANADIAN RUclipsR’S MOCKING OF THE REAL TORONTO ACCENT SHE GREW UP AROUND!!!! TORONTO ACCENTS ARENT FROM ARIZONA, THE UK OR THE STATES WHAT SO EVER! ITS A CANADIAN ACCENT SO SPECIFIC TO THE CITY OF TORONTO!!
Depends. There are some laws and crimes where intent does matter (as displayed when LegalEagel talks about harassment and its meaning), but this is NOT one of them.
@@PowerKnowing Exactly … "ignorance is no defense" is only generally true regarding ignorance of the law. "Your honor, I didn't know that it's illegal to shoot people." would not fly . (this is not legal advice) Her argument sounds dumb regardless. She did dox him so she obviously knows enough about how it's done.
People are too fixated on the "doxxing" angle. This isn't a matter of releasing personal information, it's a physical threat. No different than "be careful what you say, I know where you live"
Yeah. It’s commonly noted that threats of violence can have the same psychological impact as violence Genuine fear of harm is harm. So when you threaten someone there is legal responsibility regardless if you meant it or not
As far as I can tell, she never threatened him in anyway. Well, I suppose showing up at his home could be considered a threat, though in this case it's not a legal threat.
@@Soulsphere001 Yeah but she seems like the kind of person who'd have an army of let's say... unconditionally loyal fans, the most insane of which might potentially be motivated to take action.
@@CoalOres "Seems like"? It would be nice if you knew one way or the other rather than stating that "she seems like". Though you could, very well, be right. I mean, I guess it's a similar thing to what former president Donald Trump did back on January sixth, and even before that, at the capital. I don't think Trump meant any harm, but he was pretty dumb not to realize that some of his fans were going to cause trouble. So, yeah, she has the capability of causing Jacksfilms quite a lot of harm (whether or not she means to).
Especially important to note, on her livestream people note "oh they have doordash they might come out" and then on Jack's stream, Erin goes "is she the one who got us food?" So she literally tried baiting them out with food to fight. Psycho move, literally hunting them, especially knowing her public record of Armed Robbery charges.
@@Gearrion Many court cases are decided by opinion, my friend. "Based on intent" is opinion because people lie. But if a judge declares SSSniperwolf guilty of doxxing because in their opinion, she had ill intent, that's all that is needed. The other side could be stated too. She can be found innocent or the case dismissed because of the OPINION that she REALLY DIDN'T have ill intent. So opinions can definitely mean a lot.
@Gearrion You do realize that opinions on morality are why the law exists to begin with, right? The only reason murder is illegal is because we collectively agreed on it. If opinions are worthless then your only system of morality is might makes right, which I'd love to see you defend when someone mightier than you decides to screw you over.
It was the most diplomatic way to stay on RUclips’s good side. “I could say what she did was illegal, but I won’t, because… money… and I don’t want her to come for me next.”
I would say this is quite different to the Streisand situation because of the intention. The photographer wasn't targeting her. Sssniperwolf was specifically targeting Jacksfilms. Even taken in best possible faith it's still insane behaviour to show up to someone's house unannounced because of an internet feud.
What we learned from this whole situation is RUclips is a disgusting company and as long as you’re big enough no matter how talentless you are you’re above all rules.
The things that piss me off the most: 1. RUclips has unfairly promoted her even though all her content is theft 2. They have multiple times held off on copyright strikes to give her time to remove sections of videos before the strike hits. Something NO OTHER CREATOR GETS! 3. They have banned creators for JOKING about doxxing creators and staff. And they just demonetized her “temporarily”. 4. She began uploading all her videos to an alternate, monetized account, which is avoiding the monetization ban. This is a terminable offense in RUclips’s TOS, and yet, with 2 terminable offenses she is still on the platform. Makes me glad I’ve been cross-posting to Rumble and Odysee already, so when the exodus happens, I’m ready. Because this is yet another straw on the camel’s back, and a couple more could break it
Companies are always going to give people who make them money more leeway that others. That's business for you. Also, wealthy people can generally get away with significantly more than others can. Welcome to Earth, where the bottom line is usually more important than anything else. The doxxing that she did was perfectly legal, which is probably why they didn't ban her. Plus I imagine it's better, though I'm not entirely sure, to legally dox someone than make a joke about illegally doxxing someone.
@@OctagonalSquare There's a difference between joking about illegally doxxing someone and legally doxxing someone. It's basically like killing someone in self defence versus making a joke about murdering someone, though that's an extreme example.
I think the main difference between Streisand and this case is the audience. Sssniperwolf has documented how absolutely insane some of her fans can be. It wouldn't be much of a reach to say her audience has a much higher likelihood of following through with malicious action due to having access to that small bit of information. At that point, she should be held partially liable for setting up that situation
The bigger difference between this case and the Streisand case is that the photo wasn't even labelled as being Streisand's house. The photographer was documenting erosion along the coast and took a lot of photos to show the current state of erosion. One of the homes in this collection of photos just so happened to be Streisand's house. But nobody knew this until Streisand kicked up a big fuss about it.
@@mattbosco2178 Nope, SSSniperwolf said it was Jack's house. The photographer that took the picture of Streisand's house didn't label it as such. Noone knew it was Streisand's house until she brought it up.
also, that photographer wasn't beefing with streisand beforehand (i think). to do this in the context of an argument IS an act of intimidation, especially with the added context of her sister making it pretty clear they wanted a fight.
The tweet itself made it clear. There's literally no reason for her to post that photo if not to cause him harm. There's literally no reason for her to even take the photo to begin with.
@@chunkycornbread4773 she could have knocked on the door and had a conversation without her online buddies. I’m not saying it would be right, but it would be braver than sniping electronically and running
Honestly, work. Why should Jack feel like he can just run a hate campaign with impunity? You don't think it's endangering her to push this incel content for MONTHS at a time, creating an obssessive narrative around her?
The Streisand case doesnt seem like the best or even most fair comparison. The photograph of her house was documenting the coastline and it just happened to capture Streisand's house; SSSniperwolf published the picture with malicious intent and, as evidenced by her earlier story, she was aware it was intentional.
Agreed - posting something that happens to be someone's house is what Google Maps vans do, but taking photos of someone's house BECAUSE it's someone's house is the kind of thing that gets journalist photographers banned from the industry and sued for millions. Worlds apart, imho.
Damn, I should have kept scrolling because I commented this above in response to a comment because I hadn't seen it mentioned. That really bothered me.
I see two important differences between the Streisand photo and this case: 1) 'legitimate purpose': the photo which happened to include Streisand's home was part of a survey of the California coast; this one had no purpose *other* than to harm Jacks; 2) 'private information': had it not been for Streisand's own actions, her home would have just been one unlabelled dwelling in a series of photos; this picture was distributed clearly labelled as belonging to Jacks.
Also, some of her fans have been to Jack's house since and posted from his yard which would not be happening except for her actions. How long until one of these fans is an actual psycho and decides to go into the house with violent intent? What she has done has caused jacksfilms to be rightfully scared for the safety of his family. SSSniperwolf needs to GO!
@@jaredmundi3599even if it’s not someone going psycho, it’s still invading privacy and depending on where they go, trespassing. It’s still very negligent on her part and encouraging harassment as she hasn’t said anything to the effect of people stopping it only that she was ‘sorry’ and that what she did was wrong
@@jaredmundi3599 Gavin from Slow Mo Guys comes to mind. Really bad shit can happen to internet celebrities when unhinged fandom people are involved. As a normal person, it would freak ANYONE out to have people essentially scoping your house out from across the street even. She knew what she was doing. A person doesn't do something like this unless they wanted to start some real bad shit. What's sad is there is no actual reparation if say.. he and his family feel so unsafe that they need to move. People like Sniperwolf are predators by proxy, i.e. weaponizing her fans.
@@TheSwauzz Yeh i agree completely! This is why she needs to be scrubbed from the internet, and let that serve as a warning to others that doxxing is completely unacceptable. As it is and the way its been handled is pathetic, and doesn't address the larger issue which is that NOW people are thinking that doxxing is not so bad of a thing to do, because this idiot has basically gotten away with it scot free @youtube
this is a classic case of outdated law. I agree she may not meet the requirements to be illegal but she still needs to be punished for violating jacksfilms online privacy and vaguely threatening them so she at least needs a misdemeanor (also promoting her fans to get his address saying its easy to find) and unlike the California coast one she took the picture purposefully at the house
Nothing small would likely charge her behavior. It would be awesome if we had an education system that taught ethics and if we also had repercussions where young adults and teens have to attend several classes on ethics, empathy, and trying to open their minds a little about the fact that everything isn't a joke and words/messaging can be very dangerous and it doesn't hurt to spend a moment critically thinking about your actions. It's not new but this sort of personality is weirdly popular and often operates under the its just words, memes, etc. Even while saying and promoting dangerous or horrible things way worse than a slap or a punch.
"She may not meet the requirements to be illegal but she still needs to be punished for violating jacksfilms online privacy and vaguely threatening them so she at least needs a misdemeanor" Do I agree that she should be punished? 100% yes. But if her actions don't meet the requirements to be illegal they can't just give her a misdemeanor. That's just not how that works. Either she committed a crime or she didn't
So I wanted to make a comment about how Sssniperwolf didn't just post a picture of Jacksfilms' house to her story. It was actually a video where she was saying how Jack should be out any minute and how she ordered ice cream to his house to try and lure him outside. Her sister also made tweets asking if Jack didn't know how to fight or something.
A few facts you missed out here: Sniperwolf's sister (who was allegedly with her) posted on twitter that they intended to "fight him". Sniperwolf's fans have continued to repost the image of his house, including a full address, on twitter. They have also doxxed a few other RUclipsrs who have spoken against Sniperwolf. Jack and his wife have not been home since the incident and have been on vacation away from their home, we have no way of knowing if them returning to their home may result in any sort of harmful action towards them or their property. Also, Sniperwolf has posted videos before of her talking about fans following her to her house, so there's a case to be made that she knew exactly what she was doing. Not to mention, she's also been arrested and convicted for armed robbery, which pair that with the tweets from her sister, paints the situation in a different light.
This and some other comments to this video tell me that LegalEagle did not do a very good job of gathering the facts of the case before posting this video. I sincerely hope he creates an update to it adding the additional context.
@@zelandakhniteblade5436 Depending on how recently these came to light, the video may have been finished before they were known. News moves fast on the internet, and unless you're making videos that reach the incredibly high standard of quality Sssniperwolf's videos meet, it can take too long to properly address updates before publishing a video.
@@aaronleverton4221 Legal conclusions depend on the specific facts and evidence of the case. Many of these were left out. Since they are relevant, an update would seem to be in order. This was done on some other cases where additional information came to light subsequent to shooting and even in one famous case within a single video as events unfolded in real time.
I think a big difference to note with Streisand's home is that visitors to the website might not have even known it was her home until the lawsuit took place. SSSniperwolf explicitly noted that the home shown belonged to Jackfilms.
This is a very salient point. Taking a picture that incidentally shows someone's home is very different from livestreaming someone's home and clearly stating who the house belongs to
Exactly this. There wasn't any history of online beef in the Streisand case, where it can easily be shown that what she's done here was done to incite fear in Jacksfilms and potentially violence among her fan base. It is not even close to being the same.
Yes. At the time, no one, not even the photographer, knew that was Streisand's home until she sued. Sniperwolf explicitly stated that this was his home.
@@jaredmundi3599 Even with all that, it doesnt come close to the definition of doxxing under the law in california, the outside of your house is not private property... Google proved that with google street, you wont get away with saying that, and you need to know the ramnification of stupid legal arguments, the only way sniper could be in danger legallly, is if she has said to anyone, that she was hoping something bad would happen to jack, it doesnt matter if they feel fearful of their life, if all she said was, i wanna talk ,even if WE ALL know its bs way of wanting to talk, legally , you cant just ignore the evidence, because you know deeper context, because then thats precedent for a lot of people getting in trouble for dumb stuff
The scary thing is that she has a criminal record for armed robbery. Someone known to have guns turning up at your house like that should be taken a serious threat.
@@NylaTheWolfYeah, she has two in fact. One from July 22nd 2013 for armed robbery and the second from August 12th 2016 for disorderly conduct - fighting
Jack has been completely silent about this. It could mean he’s pursuing legal action against her. If he is, every lawyer he contacts will tell him to stop discussing the case publicly.
@@ZarChasmOfficialI know you are just making a joke but try to not attack her appearance. It sends the message to her fans that people are jealous of her or just mad at her appearance. She committed a crime and needs to be punished for her actions regardless of her appearance or gender.
So because he called her out on stealing people's stuff she thinks its okay to go to his house and show his address to her literal MILLIONS of followers? How does she not think shes in the wrong here?
@@houseofaction That's almost the same thing, and it wasn't just his doorway. It was the front of the building, she also intimated that it's in LA near a studio she was using
@@houseofaction you do know how easy it would be to get the address from a picture of the front door alone? people can post a random picture of a tree and someone can track down the exact tree's location; how much easier do you think it is to track down a house?
@@redisthecoolestcolour if talking was what she wanted she could have knocked on the door. Still creepy, but a lot better than everything else she did.
I have to wonder what "adults" she knows that "talk" this way. If the "adult" conversation you want to have over a conflict can't happen at a coffee shop or by telephone, it should be happening either through a lawyer or not at all.
"Hey, I found out you do videos talking about my mistakes!" "But you came to my house and tried to bait me off my family's home!" "But you are a MAN who says valid and hurtful things of a WOMAN, how dare you? Open your door! "Let's talk like adults" "
i have no idea why Jacksfilms thought it was a good idea to expend so much energy attacking another creator. he created a whole channel just to "document" Sssniperwolf's life. that is an unhealthy obsession, lmao
@@BikingWIthPandaExcuse me? Attacking? Do you even know about what he's doing? It's rhetorical btw, I know you don't know. Or know but don't really understand shii
@@BikingWIthPandaI get where you're coming from, but Jacksfilms wasn't really documenting her life. He was dedicating his time to crediting creators who felt cheated by SSSniperWolf. Many people came to him with stories about how their content was stolen and seemed to feel like someone was on their side. The bingo card game may have been purely to poke fun at her, but that isn't a crime, nor was it simply an excuse to watch her content. Whether you agree with his way of going about it or not, I wouldn't necessarily call it an obsession.
It's so much worse, they're not ignoring it, they're actively endorsing and encouraging it. She is a featured creature at vidcon, she's a poster woman for RUclips and all her content is literally illegal.
Their terms are more like suggestions. I've literally been told that an account with my real first and (uncommon) last name on it doesn't count as impersonation.
What the "creator" in this case is doing is also outside the terms of "fair use", so I'm surprised she hasn't already been hit with multiple DMCA takedown notices. Many Twitch 'personalities' who do exactly the same thing have been removed from that service, for things like just watching an entire anime while they appear in a tiny box in the upper corner. Being objectively hot shouldn't mean you get to flout copyright law.
It seems like posting photos of a coastline to coastline enjoyers is a bit different than posting someone's house to a crowd that's both angry at JacksFilms and desperate to get SSStalkerWolf's attention. Seems like very important context.
Please don't change her name to something softer. The name she chose is SS Sniper Wolf, in other words she considers herself a nazi and an assassin. She's not some innocent "stalker" she's an SS Sniper, and let's highlight that whenever we can, so there will be no confusion about her intentions and her ideology.
@@gladtobeangrynah, that's too much thought. She stole the name from a video game character, Sniper Wolf, from Metal Gear Solid, and added more letters to the begining so it wouldn't be exactly the same. Kind of like how she steals content and adds the bare minimum "reactions" to pretend it's fair use.
Yeah. It's a bit crazy to me Devin didn't take this into account. If there are millions of people looking at the picture of a house, SOMEONE will find it. Never underestimate obsessed people.
While the context is important in determining the law, and that argument may be important to fight to establish new precedence, I think the lack of bringing it up shows that it would likely fall flat in front of a judge. Mentioning the imminent action and lack of previous harassment also points out that the argument would fall flat as that would be contrary to a "willful and knowing" action.
I love your content LE, but I feel like you missed, left out, or altogether ignored some context. I’m like 99% sure that she has a charge for armed robbery on her record, not to mention that her sister messaged Jack “what, you afraid to fight a girl?” when Sniperwolf was there & he wouldn’t come outside. I’m pretty sure there is a legal basis for making the claim that he was in fear of immediate physical danger. I think that proves they had malicious intent and knew what they were doing. She’s 31 and a resident of the internet for many years. She knows what doxxing is, and in addition to that, she knows how damaging and dangerous it can be for a public figure. Pretty sure one of her friends has been doxxed. With all the context put into place, I think it’s disingenuous to make this video and not look into all the important prior context, that, when put together, makes a clear line of culpability pointing right back at Sniperwolf
She might not have been intending violence, but she was certainly intending him to believe she was (at least jokingly) threatening violence. And she knew he knew about her criminal record. And obvs that also means she knows the law about this sort of thing pretty well, and we can assume that millions of followers means she knows the terms of service well as well. But I get that LE had to leave some bits out and keep it open-ended etc as always, it spells out the "if X then Y" and we can fill it in ourselves based on the obvious evidence.
Well that somewhat changes my belief that she could have gone over without filming or taking pictures for clout to actually talk to him like adults. Definitely could have just emailed to discuss.
Sadly, what I take from this video is that unless physical harm comes to Jack and Erin as a result of the dox, a lawsuit would not have much weight. And as any stalked person knows, that is the scariest realization.
Not to mention, his use of the Steisand Effect as precedent is tenuous at best because the whole issue there is her house wasn't labeled in the photo. It was just a photo of the coastline, IIRC, and her house was visible but nobody knew it belonged to her until she made a big fuss. SSSniperwolf spefically said this is Jack's house. Not the same at all.
Oh, that is most indeed a boilerplate "sorry, not sorry; sorry I got caught" PR apology written by someone else, meant to sweep things under the rug. I'd be willing to bet that the only reason there was even an "apology" was because RUclips said to put one out in order to get her little slap on the wrist.
I think jacks does actually have a case here because during the situation sssniperwolfs sister was posting on twitter talking to jacksfilms about how she wanted to fight. And then stopped after a couple hours before likely deleteing them (probably at the dying request of their pr team/lawyers
Setting aside the doxxing, can we agree that showing up at someone's house unannounced demanding to talk is something I would expect from a crazy ex-girlfriend that refuses to move on. If you swapped the genders of the people involved, I doubt we'd be talking about demonetizing videos, and be talking about restraining orders and criminal stalking.
It is weird to me that the "stalking" aspect wasn't really touched on in this video. I'm sure criminal stalking is hard to prove off of one big incident, but showing up at someone's house in the middle of the night, streaming a video of it, and trying to get them to come outside, especially when they're someone you're not on good terms with, is definitely a major issue. Like you said, if the roles were reversed this would be playing out very differently and the police would likely have been involved immediately.
@@Gamer3427 It's a serious issue morally, but showing up and posting a photo (then likely leaving) wouldn't constitute any stalking when it's a one time incident (as you mention). The police wouldn't be able to do anything if the roles were reverse - at most they'd just speak to both parties and tell them to just avoid each other. Absolute dick move, as is standard with her, but nothing illegal (yet).
Claims she "doesn't know how to dox" but has been in court documents where she ruined a dude's life by claiming he was an SO and posting his personal info including address in her comments
Objection: The Streisand case and this one aren't comparable because Streisand's mansion was part of a photo set over a coastline, with no identifying factors attached. Jacksfilms' house was mentioned in an Instagram story showing she was planning to go to it prior and then was attached to a vaguely threatening message, which came with clear intentions in a conversation with SSSniperwolf's sister. This is blatant malicious intent, and I'm not sure how you don't get imminent threat out of his reaction on the livestream. Even if the threat has passed, that doesn't mean the threat of her coming back is gone.
Precisely. Nobody knew it was her house until she said it in the lawsuit. However SSSniperWolf said who lives in the house while filming it and while telling her millions of followers (who she does not know the mental state of) that he was a bad guy. Kinda seems real irresponsible and dangerous af.
Further, her fan base has access to the information as well, and while it might not be likely, it would not be absurd to assume one of her fans could show up or follow one of them leaving their home. Unfortunately, I think LE missed the mark here
reminds me a bit of chris packham in the new forest, someone set fire to his car in his home, its all well and good until someone takes this information too far, as to how people found where he lived I had no idea...
@@reed560Correction: Some members of her fanbase already HAVE weaponized this information and are calling for targeted harassment I can’t remember the username but a few weeks ago, there was a Twitter user repeatedly posting Jack’s address in the name of popularity, and just today there was an Andrew Tate “parody” account that found his address AGAIN and posted it on Twitter with the intent of doxxing his phone number as well - their exact words were “your [sic] harassing a girl, you sexist bastard. I stand with SSSniperWolf!”
Sssniperwolf: -has criminal charges of assault and theft -ignored a child who was dying and wanted to meet her -doxxed JacksFilms then posted a joke about it on Instagram - blatantly steals content from people and doxxed the person crediting them - was sued by her Ex-boyfriend for faking her gaming videos (she looks down to find the space bar.....) RUclips: "WherE dOEs sSsnIpPerwoof gEt heR vIDeO idEA" *then saying Jack was part of the problem, even though he was doing what RUclips didn't*
A few extras: -has a history of being homophobic -brings people down -makes fun of people who had work done, despite her obviously having work done on herself -fat-shamed a girl
There was a food delivery sent to their address that they didn't order at the time sssniperwolf was outside their house - regardless of if it was by her or a fan it was intended to get them outside of the house. Jack and his family have fled the house in fear of what is going to happen and haven't posted anything to their channel after that video. Her sister confirmed they where there to start a fight, sssniper has prior arrests for public assault and armed robbery. The issue I have is both her and her sister repeatedly stated "his address if on google" - I fail to see how this isn't instructions for her fans to look up his address and Doxxing by proxy. I don't accept the "lapse of judgment" seen as the next day she was braggin and joking about it. Also her apology says "thank you youtube for making me accountable, I respect the decision" - she breaks a different youtube TOS by trying to avoid demonetization / ban evading by posting videos instead to her second channel that hadn't be demonetised.
personally i think youtube creators (myself included) should be held to a high level of accountability. if Jacksfilms needs to have someone show up to teach him a lesson about attacking others, so be it
@@BikingWIthPanda so, just to double check. Your saying "its ok to break the law because someone made fun of you" You would be perfectly fine with someone turning up at your house to attack you (sone one that has been arrested in the past for attacking someone), then that person give your address to 5 million people (who are capable of who knows what) because they didnt like that you made jokes about them. Not once did jack do anything other thsn point out how predictable sssniperwolf is and how much of a scum back move it is to not credit people AND to show how easy it is to credit people.
@BikingWIthPanda Honestly I know neither of these youtubers but there's a line you dont* cross with internet catfights and that's IT STAYS ON THE INTERNET. WTF kind of creep actually goes to your HOUSE? Out of line, PERIOD. Right up there with calling SWAT on streamers.
Jack’s wife was also heard saying something along the lines of “is that why there’s food” when she found out SSSniperwolf was outside. I firmly believe that bitch door dashed to his house to get him to come out. You can’t convince me otherwise.
@@Haarschmuckfachgeschafttadpole specifically in the instance of the doxxing, is where the illegality is questionable. And that potential crime is what we are using in our hypothetical comedic scenario
Honestly, that is how I feel about Jacksfilms here. His actions of creating a secondary channel and maintaining an online persona where he continuously targets SSSniperwolf would be sufficient to make her feel uncomfortable -- anyone would in such a position. In that case, I would find it entirely understandable to react the way she did (though the potential threat he posed to her source of income could plausibly be the more significant factor here). Nonetheless, I think Jacksfilms was a dick for harassing her like a kid who annoys others around him to get what he wants. Be constructive, not destructive.
The fact that she's still posting RUclips videos and turned off the comments on all her recent videos shows she is fully aware that what she did is wrong but doesn't want to read more hate
The last line in her apology where she "thanks youtube for holding her accountable" is so pathetically see through. She wasn't remorseful at all until she got in trouble, and the only thing she is thankful for is that she got a slap on the wrist instead of the ban she deserved
its PR 101; lip service. she makes it sound like she regrets her actions but you can bet she would do it again. it might also boost her popularity. i mean plenty of people who might not have known her now know the name sssniperwolf.
I honestly thought you were going to bring up her sister literally saying "I'm confused, does he not know how to fight?" as evidence that they went to his home with the intent to harm him, as well as sending food with the intent to get him out to harm him, but okay yeah if we ignore those two things then I guess you're right
I would argue there is a difference between a photographer taking a picture of a coastline that incidentally has Barbara Streisand's home on it and Specifically and purposefully taking a picture of Jack's house, and labelling it as such as well as trying to intentionally goad Jack into coming out of said house all in front of a live audience.
One major difference between this and the Streisand case: the picture of Streisand's house wasn't labelled or distinguished in any way that would identify it as her house to a casual observer. The IG post of Jacksfilms's house _was_ specifically called out as his and his family's residence.
Another major difference was that the photo of Streisand's house didn't include a vaguely worded threat to "Come outside and talk." Any reasonable person would assume going to someone house, taking a picture of it, and posting it online with the caption "Come outside" is a threat.
To play devil's advocate, it makes sense for children or people who literally have no idea what they are doing, insanity pleas, and things with mental health, I don't know, I am not a lawyer or a policy maker, and haven't had the need to look up the technical term for it. On the other hand, when you have been on a platform and have suggested that you don't like stalkers and have had a following of 5 million people, somewhere in the 10 years she has had on RUclips, she should have had more than enough experience, either with the content she watches or with her personal life, to know what doxing is and if a reasonable person can't see that then we as a society should redo our thinking
And it's not like she's never committed criminal behavior in the past. She's had criminal records for Armed Robbery and Disorderly Conduct. She should know how the law works at least.
The fact that she tried to cry sexism the moment someone criticized her should not be ignored as much as it is. She and others like her are the reason people don't take actually genuine instances of discrimination.
@@nekoest That was actually a joke... demonstrating you cannot discern reality immediately before calling her dishonest, probably not the best argument.
@@mattbosco2178 Yea, because on the internet there are people a whole lot worse than just being sexist. A statement that seems relatively normal, especially in text form when tone can't be discerned, will not seem like a joke. You making a statement such as this, and using it to criticize someone else's judgement about an entirely different thing is not a sound argument.
Exactly. It's not the non threat of a photographer taking a pic of the cliff your home sits on, and he doesn't have a following of people who love bullies and bullying or they wouldn't follow her. Trump's 'nice people on both sides' has some so much damage to our civilized society. These people literally have been coming out of the cesspool ever since. Along with his other criminal behavior that he too, does the reversal of blame, trying to make those who hold him accountable of criminal behavior, seem like they are victimizing him. This is what they all are doing. Every bully in the country. Reversing the blame when they get caught doing wrong.
@@Pewpewmagoo Even as a Sniperwolf hater and Jack supporter it still feels weird to call her a child molester. Even if that's the official definition I'm sure most people will instead think of actually physically touching somebody inappropriately. Yes, she definitely did wrong, and legally her Omegle videos qualify as creating/distributing CP. However, even as terrible as she is I don't think she's actually touched a child.
@@Aelda69 Nope, in the United States you are still presumed innocent until proven guilty even if arrested in the act of committing a crime. Note I'm not defending her, I'm advising you not to make moronic statements.
I disagree with the comparison with the Streisand case. Because it all came down to intent. The photographer was documenting the erosion of the California coast. Some of those photos happened to have the back of Streisand's house in them. Most people who saw the photos would not know that some of them had her house in them nor would anyone who even knew that it was Streisand's house. SSSniperwolf deliberately posted a picture of Jack's house and called attention to this fact to her Instagram followers.
@@Pochi1mate the law ain’t black and white or set in stone. jumping on trends without taking more time to look at nuance is gonna invite oversights like that
That's... exactly what was said in the video. The reason it was used as a comparison was just to compare the two situations and how one was setting a potential precedent. But that Sssniperwolf had a very different intent in comparison.
@@gho5trun3r68 You totally missed the point. Because LE literally said that because Streisand's house being published in a picture online wasn't an invasion of privacy, then Sssniperwolf's posting of Jack's house wasn't either. Check the 15:45 mark.
@@belinus7180 No YOU missed the point. Intent is the key issue here. Sssniperwolf wanted to chat with him. The address is public knowledge. It is already out there. The intent wasnt to find him that was already out there. The intent was to chat and hash out multiple month long beef. She didnt tell her fans "go get this guy" or something crazy. THAT is malicious intent. All she did was ask them if she should talk to him. No malicious intent, try again. In the end the Streisand case will fit here too as even tho the picture is a bit more personal, there is no breach of privacy as she didnt peep through the windows, but took a street side picture of a publicly known building. Perhaps dont make months upon months of videos shitting on a person and then play victim when they show up. If you dont have anything nice to say, keep your mouth shut. Simple as. That is old school life right there. Both did dick moves. Jack by crusading against her and harassing her for months with those cringe videos, and her for the way she approached the beef settlement. Notifications are off, good luck replying.
Elements missing in your vid: - It wasn't just a photo, it was a livestream video and she ordered ice cream to his home to lure him outside edit: it seems that the ice cream thread is misinformation; there was indeed ice cream on his doorstep but it was not ordered by her - She has a past history of charges for and literal jailtime for assault - She also has a history of shady/gross treatment of minors - She is 31 and has been on the internet for at least half that; she knows exactly what doxxing is AND HAS COMPLAINED ABOUT BEING A VICTIM OF IT - Her sister has insinuated that the intention was physical altercation - She released an "apology" that was pretty clearly written by someone/thing else; she didn't even write his channel name correctly! - edit As added by a replier, she also is very openly dodging youtube's very lax restrictions by uploading things on a second, monetised, channel
@@effbar2400 that is being tried for the same crime twice, but other laws generally take into account, criminal history, when evaluating circumstances of a different crime
the spelling of his channel is a moot point, no one wants to spell out 3 J's and when people talk about her channel you dont go around seeing people say SSSSSniperwolf, they just say sniper wolf, its not gonna change the understanding of who theyre talking about.
Slap on the wrist, and nothing is going to change. Nobody who follows her is going to stop, which is the only thing that might get through to this awful person. But no, she'll eventually jump from Jacksfilms to someone else, continuing the harassment that any of us would have been banned for, while her fans tell her how great she is. Why not? There are no real consequences. And RUclips should be terminally ashamed of that.
This is how it all starts when someone's ego is huge, she is testing the water to see what she can evade. She thinks she can do whatever she wants just because she is more popular. I hope this will be her last
She doxxed a RUclipsr seven years ago by doing a false copyright claim forcing him to reveal his address. She then used the information to dox him and falsely claim he was on an SO register. The channel Comic Crow goes over the case and the resulting lawsuit.
Lia's sister who was in the car at the time of the filming: "COME OUT AND FIGHT US, COWARD!" Lia after getting in trouble: "omg i'm just a widdle girl what is dox it sounds yummy oh i iz sowwy." She has doxxed in the past, she can't claim ignorance, and infantilizing yourself is just sad. I don't blame Jack for not returning home; you don't want to test the defense: "none of my followers murdered your kids so it's not illegal." If this was, let's say, Mr. Beast showing up at Stanzi Potenza's house and posting video of it whilst his brother tweeted "Hey girl, come out and fight!" I'm curious what RUclips would do. Would we see the #1 RUclipsr's instant fall from grace, or would RUclips want that sweet money so much, they'd ignore their own rules? How strong is the capitalistic greed?
You missed major pieces of the story. 1. Her sister confirmed on X/Twitter that she was there to fight Jack. 2. SSSniperWolf has a criminal record of armed robbery and has recently posted pictures of her gun online 3. Evidence came to light that she was involved in the sexualization of children Also, I would have liked to hear if there is a possibility to create a class action lawsuit against her representing the creators she stole content from as well as RUclips for supporting her actions.
Agree. Also missed that time she doxed a critic, falsely claiming he was on the s*xual offender list. That sht can ruin a life. (Almost ironic, now that her predatory content surfaced) So much key info AWOL :( EnigmaHood if anyone's curious. Edit: LE also missed the current lawsuit from her ex, which could cost her $$$ and could lead a reasonable person to think she might be unstable, esp AT THEIR HOME, trying to lure them out with a food order (she knew it was ice cream, shudder)
I really hope that this leads to more actions against her. She really doesn't deserve the fame and fortune that she's amassed from leeching off others.
#3 unfortunately is most likely irrelevant to this story. Yes it’s shitty, but it’s not exactly a direct correlation to her doxxing and probably gets glossed over. 1 and 2 though makes it A LOT worse in her case. Now Jack can have a better case of being fearful of retaliation, immenent harm, etc. because if someone brandishing a gun walks up to a door and “just wants to talk”, that’s a VERY easy case to make for direct harm which is outlined multiple times to be an exception to the 1st amendment.
What bothers me about this situation is RUclips isn’t above wrecking channels through demonetization and copyright strikes. And they have changed the entire landscape of the platform that drove creators away or drove them to rely on platforms such as Patreon. SSSniperwolf blatantly breaks their ToS, and she just gets a slap on the wrist.
@@scalesconfrey5739 I bet if any action targets specifically sniperwolf every fan of em will be screaming about any sort of discrimination they can think of. Oh also about 5:10 is evidence of sniperwolf playing the "but I'm a woman" card
@FutboleroOfficial Looolololol. Wow you are so far from the truth it ain't funny. Child I'm in my 40's, not some juvenile gen z/millennial basement dwelling game nerd. Most of my subscriptions are science channels or gardening. The only thing I know about Sniperwolf is that her channel always seems to be in the trending section of RUclips. I don't watch that trash like y'all young folks. But I know RUclips won't ban any channel that's bringing in money for them. It's not rocket science. Popular RUclipsrs = more cash for RUclips. Why ban your golden goose? No company did that ever.
My favorite thing about the whole situation is that after she got her temporary demonetization and said it was justified and that she accepted it... she then just took all her content and reposted it on another channel to monetize it again.
If I knew that a fellow micro-celebrity I was beefing with lived nearby where I worked, and I decided to meet up with them and hash things out, I would: 1) NOT announce publicly that I'm nearby; 2) Send a private message to the other content creator, 3) Offering to meet, NOT saying "I'm already outside your door," 4) Get confirmation that they do want to meet, then 5) Meet in a public space SOMEWHERE ELSE, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD NOT IN FRONT OF THEIR HOUSE!!!
I can't believe she has the audacity to say "RUclips held her accountable" when apparently only that one video was demonetized, not her whole channel. Like, how is that being held accountable in any way? She just got a light slap on the wrist.
I agree. I also heard that she's reuploading her vids onto another channel that has monetization to avoid the punishment, but I don't have proof cause I don't care enough to check.
Yeah but you have to realize, to someone that is surrounded by people telling her how amazing she is constantly, what youtube did seemed very harsh to her, because she thoroughly lacks a realistic perspective due to her god complex.
@@saratoga6663 Better than I thought, but still nowhere near enough of a punishment I’d say. Going out of your way to show someone “I know where you are” after having a lengthy disagreement is not a thing that can be handwaived, and sets a VERY dangerous precedent.
I feel like she has a point though. The vitriol and intensity with which people are coming for her is something I have only ever seen done to women who the online world has decided are "bad ones", never the men. And I don't think Jacksfilms created an entire channel just dedicated to mocking those male reaction channels he criticised in the past. I don't know this lady, I don't care about her content, obviously what she did here was wrong. But I am a bit baffled by this comment section's thirst for punishment after this video clearly and concisely outlined that what she did was not illegal, it was a violation of youtube's terms of service which justified the demonetization she got. Clearly, people want to see her suffer, see her destroyed over this, and I can't help but feel like it would not be this extreme if she wasn't a woman.
@@baguettegott3409RUclips put SSSniperWolf on a pedestal and promotes the shit out of her. He proportioned his criticism of her to the amount of damage she’s doing to the platform.
@@mattbosco2178 they’re livestreams and he puts in effort to credit the videos that she consistently fails to. He’s basically doing what he can to undo the damage. You gotta keep in mind, RUclips is his job, so it’s pretty easy for him to make a lot of videos doing this, especially when he streams.
@@baguettegott3409Being technically legal doesn't make it acceptable, she got TEMPORARILY demonetized and BYPASSED the punishment, youtube has destroyed other channels for far less, she literally should have been destroyed ages ago like everyone else would if they did the same thing. If anything if she was a man she would already be long gone. The 'woman get attacked more' card is weak as hell in this age. Do you have any idea why it appears that way? If a guy wants to bring down a woman doing something wrong, he needs a stack of concrete evidence. Men don't really have anything like feminists to blindly back them up. If it's a woman making the accusation with no evidence at all, there are many cases where the accused is just immediately turned into the villain, and if they don't have rock solid defense on the spot by the time they do there's no point because they already lost everything. So, there are so many cases where someone being "attacked for being a woman" ends up being "all the men doing the same thing just didn't get far enough to make as big of a splash when they fall"
@@baguettegott3409 "if it's legal, then it's moral, and the only reason to oppose it is sexism" id like to offer my condolences to your parents. dealing with the head injury that made you this way must've been very hard
This is also someone who has been arrested for armed robbery. Yes, you heard that correctly, SSSniperwolf was once arrested for armed robbery, and this individual shows up at night outside your house and makes vague threats? You better believe I'd feel unsafe.
I'd be more concerned if she was actually convicted. Not to mention allegedly the incident was her being aggressive with a security guard over clothes at a store. She didn't whip out a gun and try to rob the store, but those actions "technically" go under armed robbery. So yeah, I highly doubt she is some ultra mega threat or anything. Add to this she posted online where she was and stated her intentions, so if her plan was murder that is absolutely ridiculous since you basically guarantee you're screwed in court if you follow through. She isn't someone who would go shoot or murder someone, she's just an emotional wreck who doesn't think straight. Just my perspective
@@GodofGoblins You don't have to directly have violent intentions to be threatening to someone. Dragging your social media fandom to someone's front door absolutely is an aggressive and intimidating action.
@user-mv5zt8qd9l well this is important when it comes to the legal aspect. It specifically states on California law that malicious intent must be proven to execute a punishment. Since that is incredibly difficult to do due to how everything went down, she is legally safe. We can talk morality all day, but court isn't going to care about that. All people can do is shame her actions and ignorance and move on
@@GodofGoblins Except there is a lot of legal precedent stating that due to people not being clairvoyant, you don't need to know someone wanted to harm another directly in order to establish intent. Lia running to his house to turn the cameras on for her social media following is intent. Her making veiled threats during and immediately after the incident is intent. If you had to prove with zero doubt that someone wanted a certain result in order to prosecute, no one would be prosecuted.
This is another one of those situations that victims of stalking experience. They always say you don’t have a case until someone actually gets hurt at which point it’s usually too damn late.
I definitely don’t think she “didn’t know the ramifications of what she was doing”. This girl has armed robbery charges last time I checked. That seems like enough immediate danger to me. Also… I feel like the fear of “immediate danger” could pretty easily be argued. I think a lot of people would come as witness
Ssstalkerwolf is in her 30's. She's fully aware of what she's doing but thinks she's going to get away with showing up at the Jacksfilms' home and threatening to "throw hands" because she's never faced any consequences for her actions.
Out of curiosity. Wouldn't the fact that she stated in the original post she wanted to talk to him, make it different from the Streisand incident? Streisands house being photographed was incidental due to it's proximity to the coast and the photographer doing a legitimate surveying of the area. SS SniperWolf - literally tried to instigate a confrontation by saying she wanted to "talk" to him with the post of his home. Which was not incidental, it was deliberate with intent. Does that not change the legality of it?
I feel like it could. Like, if I were to be playing geo guesser and Jack films house was in the video, it was zero intent of showing the home. But if I intentionally go to his home and post a video mentioning his name its obvious. And anyone can recognize that. Now could it be argued me purposefully going up to not easily accessible information to post it online is not always malicious? Sure, however that heavily depends on the context as to what I was doing. Sssniperwolf posting it with "let's talk like adults" and constantly accusing jack (I know that's not his real name) of harassment and obsessive behavior could be argued that she was aware of any possible malicious actions taken against him by her fans. Because, its the internet and people have done a WHOLE lot more for a whole lot less. Swatting is a prime example. Almost killing people during a live stream, for what? A "joke".
The Streisand house example was specifically about the accusation of "Invasion of privacy." Harassment is a separate allegation, and the Streisand example wouldn't really apply to it. Invasion of privacy is like someone's filming through a window in your back yard, that is not in plain view of the public, to try to see what you're doing. Sharing a photo/video of a house from a public street, in plain view by the public is protected by the first amendment and in no situation would be considered an invasion of privacy, otherwise for example paparazzi could not exist. Anything or anyone you can see from a public space, you can legally record. I personally think the harassment accusation and doxxing have a lot of credibility, but the invasion of privacy doesn't hold water legally.
@@bardthief You can't just sue for harassment though thats the thing. There is no tort for "harassment." It has to be sexual harassment, racial harassment, etc..... Him suing wouldn't go anywhere at all really. She didn't really "doxx" him because the information she posted isn't really considered confidential and to prove intent there would be EXTREMELY difficult especially given the circumstances that LegalEagle himself pointed out here.
It's so infuriating because we have another classic case of "having to wait until something serious actually happens before we can do anything about it" on our hands here. Nothing meaningful will be done or change unless one of SSSniperWolf's lunatic fans actually shows up to Jacksfilms' house and attacks him and his partner.
Some of her fans have made "jokes" about how easy it would be to kill his dogs with poisoned meat. And RUclips is STILL acting like nothing is amiss here!
Considering her sister later posted a tweet stating something along the lines of “modern men are a joke, does he not know how to fight.” I personally think the argument could be made that she clearly had ill intentions. Why would her sister question his ability to “fight” if she only came there to talk? Her prior arrest record to me totally justifies Jacksfilms reasonable fear. She’s been arrested for disorderly conduct (fighting) and armed robbery.
A) Her sister is allowed to have an opinion on Jacksfilm's masculinity. Doesn't mean you can prove Wolf's state of mind. Definitely doesn't mean you can infer her intention off of what someone else said or believes. B) She was not convicted of either arrest. It's not something that could be used against her. She has no prior convictions.
@@KarazolaX the comment implies that they were intending to fight him, the sister and sniperwolf were also together at the time meaning even if sniperwolf didn't intend to do harm to jack her sister did
@@slowbro7944 ok? how many people a day talk about how much they want to hurt literally anyone, her sister wasn't present when she went to his house. she can't be held liable in any way for her sister's words.
RUclips's "behavior on both sides" is such a grotesquely idiotic and clearly-biased foot to stick in their mouth. We can read between the lines: "Jack unfortunately does not have a legal case against her which might have more luck in forcing our hand, and she still makes us more money than him anyway, so we're only to going to marginally pretend that we care, and shame on Jack for making us lift a finger." This lady is the poster child for folks in dire need of rude awakenings and humble pie, and if it can happen to other content creators, I see no reason why she should be immune to punishment and consequences for her actions. That arrogant childish nonsense needs to stop before she really gets someone hurt.
@@kyedaoh yeah where the person had criticized other people on these types of lazy reacting, having bingo card on things she constantly do with his fans, give the people who’s in her videos shout-outs, and telling them how to get their video removed from her videos because she didn’t ask for it.
⚖ What should we cover next?
🚀 Start saving with Rocket Money! legaleagle.link/rocketmoney
🦅 Get a great lawyer with EagleTeam legaleagle.link/eagleteam
The Flips Continue! How boned is the Cheeto?
I need your haircut. Who's your barber ?
Please Do A JFK 1991 Film Review on it's LAW ACCRUCY PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE?
Would like to know with how the partial treatment (protection from copyright and no real punishment for doxing when youtube has banned for even saying it as a joke) that sniper has been getting from youtube open up youtube for discrimination lawsuit for most people that have been banned for the same thing?
Wait this is a terrible video. I agree jackfilms got doxxed and sssniperwolf is terrible but your info is either outdated or just out right lying.
1) sssniperwolf isn't denying wrong doing. She publicly apologized
2) youtube did demonize sssniperwolf for an unknown set of time
3) jackfilms is being critized for being a bad actor by RUclips.
Please do your research before making videos
The fact she went to his house, posted it to millions of ppl, and didn't apologize until she started to lose money herself speaks VOLUMES about her lack of care for other ppl's safety.
Can you not tell that by watching about 3 minutes of any of her content?
She also didn't apologize.
jack is obsessed with her one or two videos would have been criticism keeping making all the ones he did is harassment
@@jonnym4670 Doesn't justify doxxing tho
@@jonnym4670
Making videos about someone, and being critical of them, isn't obsession.
And, like the previous commenter stated, even if that was so, that doesn't warrant SSSniperwolf's doxxing of Jacksfilms.
Her claiming that “she doesn’t know how to Dox someone” is like forcing a bank teller to give you money at gunpoint and then claim you have no idea how to rob banks.
Lol. That was probably her argument for armed robbery…
That was the funniest goddamn thing I've seen in weeks.
100% Ignorance is not an excuse.
Her entire career consists of pretending to be surprised and ignorant of things, you think that's gonna stop when she's in trouble??
I bet the content she removed she'd say I don't know have to be a p**o
RUclips didn't actually do anything. They gave her a temporary demonitization, but ONLY on new videos, not channel-wide, and they're willfully ignoring the fact that she's ban evading them by having a second, monetized channel where she's re-uploading demonitized videos.
I wouldn't be surprised if they gave her direction on the evasion. It reeks of a, "Hey, we gotta do something, so this is the minimum we can legally get away with, but here's what you can do..." response.
@@mathers000 That's great, so what was her punishment for ban evasion?
@@tewks4458 Want to bet mathers can't answer that? 🤣
@@tewks4458 demontising the other channels lol, as if they'd do anything major
There's like two channels that say her SssniperWolf name on Rumble, and one of them have a couple of her videos on it. Not sure, if it's her channel, or if someone else is using her stage name.
her sister literally posted "what you don't know how to fight?" when he expressed that he won't come outside... that is a threat of violence
Thats how adults talk in their world 😅
still a threat.@@soliniv1411
@@soliniv1411thats how people who either grew up tough or people who wanna be tough talk 😭?
It's obviously a joke lmao.
@@momchilandonov It's not when strangers with a record who have beef with you are outside your house.
RUclips's response to this is despicable ... both sides? A reminder there is a tier system based on how much money you make for RUclips. If this was a minor RUclipsr who did this ... instant deplatform for sure.
Yes, it is youtube.
There's good people on both sides
Trump said the same sort of thing defending Nazis
@@keatoncampbell820yeah bro tell me which SS officers were nice people since both sides have good people
Say capitalism.
One big issue I have is not once has sssniperwolf said to her fans "Please don't do anything, please don't escalate the situation, what I did was wrong and it needs correcting"
@@mattbosco2178 no, never said "the only issue" I have many issues with what sssniperwolf did. I said it was oneof the bigger issues I have with howshe has handled this.
Also FYI, there is lots of evidence, tweets from her and her sister, screen shots and the half assed apology by ssssniperwolf... you know.. the one saying she regrets what she did but doesn't actually fix anything. Saying "I'm sorry :( I feel sad" does nothing to fix the messshe made.
fun thing, this can be used as evidence against her in the court case between her and sausage.
she claimed his actions have damaged the channel - he will be able to use this as evidence as to its actually her that makes damaging and rash decision.
@@mattbosco2178 also love how most accounts speaking out in sssniperwolfs defence are blank husksand have nothing to suggest they are real also love how most are quite new accounts (about a year old)
That or they all follow the same Business accounts (seriously, who subscribes to the nordVPN youtube account)
btw, not saying you are a bot / paid account as if you where someone did a sloppy job😆
@@mattbosco2178 You cared enough what they think to reply.
@@mattbosco2178There's something called the internet bud. If it existed, it's somewhere.
@@mattbosco2178 There is evidence. The photo of Jacksfilm's house is still out there on the internet. There are even screenshots of the post itself to show that it was SSSniperwolf who posted it.
Her sister has indicated that she went there to pick a fight. Literally won't stop bringing up the subject that Jack wouldn't fight her.
That's a very one sided way to look at it. The statement was more "are you afraid to fight a small girl" to try and point out that he'd have no reason to be scared. It's like claiming you are scared of a chihuahua.
Honestly, everyone in this story is unlikable. Jacksfilms, even if he thinks he has good intentions, is clearly profiting off her and she's just dreadful all around.
Sometimes nobody is the good guy.
She's going to pull that with the wrong person.
And he stayed in his house and cried lol. Imagine thats your husband? A little girl intimidated him. What a beta man child. Shes probably gonna leave him over this. Its hard to respect a man who is such a coward like that.
@@andrewshandle He was actually creating actual transformative content and working to find which creators Sniper stole from to credit them. Heck, he's even said that if she at the bare minimum would actually properly credit people she stole from, then he'd be done. What she was doing was still illegal at that point, but at least the creators would get some recognition.
@@nullakjg767That's an interesting way of saying that you've never felt the touch of a woman.
"Nobody ever attacks the male react channels" Did she miss all the drama around the React Bros? Absolutely everyone rightfully came for them. This is what it looks like when someone weaponizes their minority status to play the victim.
Women are not a minority
Not just them but also XQC which I think Jacksfilms also talked about at some point since his "style" is very similar to hers
@@russman3787They don't share the same power, privilege, and opportunities as men. Granted women aren't as much of a minority as they were back in the day and they're not a minority in the sense that they're in the minority but they're still technically a minority.
@@russman3787 'Someone' in this context is not many, but a specific person.
@@kosmiquei don’t think they qualify as mentally and physically old enough to be considered adults
Still absolutely wild to me that she got the RUclips equivalent of a verbal warning. I wouldn't be surprised if literally anybody else got banned, sued, etc :/
She's a cash cow for RUclips. They're not going to stop maximizing their profits
They absolutely would too,just look at Act Man who jokingly said hed do it after QuantumTV wasn't punished and RUclips demonitized him for "threatening employees"
@@RemixedVoiceI hate capitalism. I hate capitalism. I hate capitalism...
News companies do it all the time
You wouldn't know that by watching this video with outdated info
Even if SSSniperwolf didn't know what doxxing is, as she claims, ignorance of the law does not excuse the actions.
This. If she truly didn’t know, then it only absolves her from (some) intent, but she is still responsible for the consequences of her actions. Because she still ended up hurting him, and that should be obvious to her. Unfortunately, some people don’t care about the harm they cause to others, only that their reputation stays intact, so they try to justify their deplorable actions
But doxxing requires specific intent as he outlined so I don't think there is much to achieve here legally.
@@strynevanzelk4944 a specific intent doesn’t mean that her intent has to be the doxxing it self. Doxxing by itself isn’t a crime (in most places) but it can constitute harassment and specially in this case, even incitement of violence. The intent it needs to have ( as in most criminal cases) is the intent to harm in any way.
by her logic ppl could say "But I didn't know murder was illegal 🥺"
@@strynevanzelk4944 Specific intent doesn't mean the intent must be to "break the law". For example, the crime of theft requires the intent to "deprive someone of their property". So, even if you truly didn't know theft was illegal, and thus had no intent to break the law, you still acted intentionally.
A good rule of thumb is to consider whether it was an accident. Did SSSniperwolf reveal his address by accident? No? Then it was intentional.
“Let’s talk like adults”
Insanely ironic, considering how childish SSSniperWolf’s actions and responses were.
Because passive-aggressively driving by a person’s house and posting it online in the middle of the night is the adult way of initiating an adult talk.
I love the fact jacksfilms was critisizing sniper wolf's overuse of reaction videos IN A REACTION VIDEO!!!
They're both being extremely childish, but hey without them being childish we wouldn't get to watch the drama!
@@arbiters487Do you not get the point of satire? The whole point was to copy what she was doing for the point of poking fun, in which his content became transformative because of the massive subtext it caused. And even with that he was a) more transformative b) actively hunting down and crediting the creators she stole from.
Especially with doxxing, you cannot say it's a "both" problem. You tubers have been SWAT-ed, assaulted, and harassed via their address. What she did put Jacksfilms in serious danger, all for critiquing her and her unethical buisness practices.
@@arthasmenethil5752 "Insanely ironic, considering how miserable and cowardy this JackFilm is."
What were you expecting him to do? Get out of his house and break her face? He would have gone to jail.
@@arbiters487 "I love the fact jacksfilms was critisizing sniper wolf's overuse of reaction videos IN A REACTION VIDEO!!!"
If that's your take away from his video, then you didn't understand the point of his videos.
It takes ONE unhinged fan of hers to call up and swat Jacks house, much like what happens to other youtubers who have had their addresses leaked
As much as Lia likes to pretend she’s 15 years old, she’s 30. A grown woman with *a history of doxxing who has in the past complained about people showing up at her house uninvited. She’s not an idiot, she’s a lazy, selfish manipulator. This was 100% with malice. She knew exactly what she was doing, especially proven after her sister asked “why is Jack scared of a little girl? Doesn’t he know how to fight?”
*changed from “criminal record” after learning her armed robbery and domestic charges were later dropped
She started in the *Call of Duty* sphere.
If you remember the type of people who were involved with that era *coughKEEMSTARcough.* That should say all you need to know.
...But seriously how Keemstar hasn't been put behind bars or well... killed by someone baffles me.
Is being 30 a death sentence,??
@@tfkdandsvkc No, it just means "i didn't know" isn't an excuse for breaking any laws or causing harm
THIS, so much this. She uses her apearance to manipulate people and it gets on my nerves.
@@tfkdandsvkcno, but she’s not a child. People like to frame her as being an innocent young woman who just doesn’t know better, when she is 30. She should know better than to do this.
As a woman myself, SSSniperwolf saying jacksfilms is only criticising her because she’s a woman and he’s just sexist and jealous is the most pitiful thing I’ve ever seen. Don’t use your identity as a scapegoat from taking criticism. It’s utterly embarrassing.
The fact that THAT isn’t the worst low she’s stooped to is very telling of the deplorability of her character.
Jack has also called out male creators before!! Anyone remember Jinx?
I hate it, it makes us all look bad! It's an insult to real victims of sexism. I agree, her and her sister have really aired out their inner personalities and dirty laundry for the entire world to see.
Miss, you dropped this 👑
I find it funny that YT was perfectly happy to let her do her thing. All she had to do was ignore a troll. But she didn't ignore the troll (I say troll but he was calling her out for very valid reasons). If (subconsciously) she really thought he was just a troll and her content theft was justified, she wouldn't have reacted and she wouldn't have to turn comments off on every video today. If ignored, JJJacksfilms would eventually quit the bit. But she made it personal now, she fed the troll.
And it's patently false to begin with, seeing as how he criticized Jinx for the exact same thing years ago.
sssniperwolf isn't sorry at all, her apology is fake, she is also breaking the ToS of youtube by putting videos from her demonetized channel and putting them on a monetized 2nd channel
You can hear it plain as day. Totally disingenuous, she knew damn well exactly what she was doing and what her goal was. She also knew that nothing would happen. At least now we know that it's fair game to treat her in the same fashion.
At least she didn't hop on the 🎵toxic gossip train!🎵
@@GJameso You have to admit though, we would've never gotten the glorious AI version of Hasanabi singing that song if she didn't make that dumpster fire of a song.
Well, even the video here shows that the apology was written by ChatGPT, so yeah.
Unfortunately YT is making too much money from her to take appropriate action and banning her for life.
It absolutely blows my mind that TheActMan gets banned for joking about doxing people on Twitter, but Sssniperwolf literally doxes someone and they don't do anything about it.
While yeah it's a blatant double standards, there's some things that need to be corrected:
- actman joked about doxxing ytbe employees, which definitely got ytbe panicked.
- actman channel didn't get banned, it got demonitized for a month, whereas sssniperwolf only got demonitized for a week.
- fyi: actman even show his demonization to his friend who to an employee at ytbe, and he also thought this is crazy.
Probably because the RUclips employees simp for SSSniperWolf for whatever reason.
its cuz RUclips are incredibly corrupt and hilariously incompetent.
@@KirbyfromDreamLand844like obese 60-year-old discord moderators
"I hope she learns from her actions". She won't. She has proven time and again that she she won't.
The only way she'll learn is if it truly harms her physically.
Or monetarily but she's yt cash cow and clearly they are incapable of holding her accountable.
didnt andrew tate doxx and showed up at someones house? before he was mega famous?
shes done it before this so she will absolutely not learn.
Maybe but Jack's problem is that he can't handle the fact that her "lazy" content is more appealing to people than the corny videos he puts so much effort in. He just can't deal with her being more successful financially than he is. That's why he went out of his way to get her demonetized. If he actually fear for his family's safety and believed she committed a crime he would have prioritized other avenues.
the fact that everyone who’s covered this story has blurred, censored, or just straight up not shown the house, says more about this situation than the law can
I was thinking the same thing: if it's not a crime/doxxing, why are you blurring the photo?
@@phoebea It's not a crime to call you a whole bunch of rude names, but if I were famous enough for people to report on my calling you names, and did call you names, you can bet most people reporting on it wouldn't call you the same names as part of their reporting.
Something can be a dick move without being illegal.
@@rmsgrey what
@@phoebea It's polite.
Yeah lol idek with that one 🤣🤣@@TheoSur
The worst thing is that, in order to protect his family, Jjjacksfilms stopped uploading. She won.
Maybe not in the best mood his life and family being threatened
You’re dramatic
...maybe a grown ass man shouldn't be involved in mocking and disparaging a young woman online. how about that?
@@thomassmith5696youtube covered for her and so far has proven that they're fine with doxxing as long as the one doing the doxxing makes enough money. It's the worst of the worst.
@@Feverdream7777 Least simpiest SSSniperwolf fan
Leaking someone's address doesn't count as an invasion of their privacy???
If that's true then that is a very dangerous hole in the legal code. People have literally died from having their address leaked, with people swatting them or showing up at their house with a gun. Someone could make you unsafe in your own home and you would have no legal recourse.
Showing a picture of a house , precedent set by Streisand, is not "Invasion of Privacy". Doxxing, harrasment and stalking are still possible crimes. Consider, Burglary or Robbery, both crimes are "taking your stuff".
that's the sad part..
we need a decent politician to pass a better law against doxxing..
In a lot of states your address is part of your "public record" and can be accessed by just about anyone willing to look for it. In fact, we've all probably "doxxed" ourselves many times by posting pictures outside our home with our home in the background, or something similar.
@@Lurksmore I would argue to intent: The Streisand photographer was documenting coastline; something in public interest. Sniperwolf went there in a more 'mob' kind of way, half egging her followers on, implying something should happen to him.
@@professorpwerrel That makes it Doxxing or Harassment.
Pulling up to someone’s house at night demanding they come out to talk is basically universally known as a call to fight. And she has a record of violent crimes.
That's a good point, She could be charged and considered to have violent intent. Also the stuff that has come out due to this, is just as damning as this
As someone who has been in many fights - ya'll are acting like babies. it's weak. I don't like her but I like him even less for being such a baby. he has been dissing her non-stop. Then he is surprised it escalates? I think many youtubers have had labotomies personally.
If your reaction to your *content* Being criticized is to escalate/attempt to fight, you are not an adult and you are emotionally a child. @@JezaJames
@@JezaJames "As someone who has been in lots of fights" so clearly you never learned to use your words like an adult, yet running around calling other people on the internet babies?
Some people's kids, man.
@@JezaJames Grow up, you child.
Few things unmentioned/forgotten:
-Sssniperwolf isn’t her first channel, just the most relevant
-Sssniperwolf has a criminal record for disorderly conduct and armed robbery
-RUclips gains a lot of revenue from her content theft and puts her on a pedestal frequently
-By stating his address is easily findable online, she essentially encourages her devoted fans to find his address
-Sssniperwolf also has a lot of unsavoury content resurfacing showing what is essentially sexual harassment involving minors
-She currently has a secondary channel she is using to ban evade her demonitisation
-Many people consider her “apology” to be AI generated
Not even consider it was tagged as 85% likely to be ChatGPT generated by a bot made to track if for school homework which is very accurate. Also it just doesn't sound like her at all. Especially if you remember her attacking the one porn star who looked like her.
the ai generated part IS mentioned in the video. on screen as you can see. you should delete that sentence from your comment.
edit: ty for the likes. Also i guess he didnt make that very clear though.
You should post the Case numbers for the criminal actions. Those are public record and free to be posted.
don't forget her 'allegedly' domestically abusing her ex boyfriend.
@@GodofGamessswe got a sniperwolf simp over here. Embarrassing
The fact RUclips didnt ban her is scary since it may encourage others to do what she did, I hope Jack & Erin are safe
I am 100% sure that if it would be a small to mid sized channel they would ban them, but since she's youtube's cash cow she got almost no punishment
nah
@@Ark_knight0yep, she got away with it because she makes them enough money. Late-stage Capitalism at its finest.
No they died, jack killed his family in a rage.
@@Ark_knight0 Did quantumtv ever get banned for doxxing the actman?
I find it hard it hard to believe that she didn’t doxx without malicious intent. This is the same woman who would doxx one of her biggest ex-hater’s full name and slander him without genuine evidence.
That just proves how broken the system is. A person doesn't have to say "I'm going to hurt you" to have malicious intent. But they're just taken her words at face value and suffering very little consequences.
she is also a felon and has been accused of armed robbery and disorderly conduct
What I find the most frustrating is that all of this happened right as Jacksfilms' videos about Sssniperwolf were actually resulting in making a difference: small creators were submitting claims against her videos and she was being forced to remove the stolen content. And now that this has happened, Jack has stopped posting videos on Jjjacksfilms about her, and I'm worried that suddenly all the progress he was making for small creators to be able to fight back will be stopped in its tracks. And I'm guessing that fact isn't lost on Sssniperwolf either.
Jack's likely being dead silent right now because he's seeking legal advice. He might continue again down the line, but I wouldn't blame him if he doesn't.
I doubt it's a coincidence. The fact that people had finally managed to get meaningful action taken against her, rather than just words, was probably a factor in her choice to escalate the feud.
Exactly why she did it
He's most likely doing it because what she did was illegal and he's coming for her. He's not the type to be intimidated.
@@JaseAnimates very true, I also would not want to look at her face right now if I was in his shoes lol, I'll miss bingo night tho
You showing the Chat GPT prompt at the beginning of sssniperwolf's apology but not even eluding to it verbally is subtly at its finest. Bravo
pasha london school
I noticed that too but didn't think to comment. I actually should have started this comment as 'You are right, and well done for your subtle and ironic sense of humour. Showing the ChatGPT prompt...." etc etc. Nice one.
I caught that, too! /chef's kiss
But this situation doesn't deserve subtly. This whole video was frustrating because it has taken such a neutral stance - very similar to RUclips's absurd response to it all. She is so blatantly in the wrong here. It's not a joke to say that apology was written by an AI - because it so clearly was.
@@OhOkayThenLazySusan Well, he is a lawyer and wouldn’t want to give anyone cause to sue him. Devon generally tries to come at these things with a neutral perspective (a notable exception to this being one of his recent Trump videos where he stopped saying allegedly, because it had already been proven in court).
The actman got perm demonetized for making a joke of doxxing youtube employees on twitter. The double standards are sickening.
Bro what? That's insanely frustrating, but also unsurprising. People protect their own harder than anyone else. It's certainly a huge double standard though and tells you where the priority lies. Lia makes them enough money for her to be treated differently.
They eventually reinstated it on his channel but I’m sure that sssniperwolf’s ban won last that long and considering the fact that she’s already ban evading and making money off of another channel and YT has yet to take action against it…
@@RrraverCrow - They caught her. They already demonetized her alts too. Probably getting an extended suspension.
@@sijrichtersonly one of her videos is demonitized.
@@sijrichters LOL I doubt it. I really don't think she will get in any additional trouble. Just silently fixed the issue.
Fun fact: @masteroogwgay just got demonetised permanently from RUclips for "stealing content", here we are with sssniperwolf not getting punished for doxing and literally stealing content.
Man, this guy aged like milk
SSSniperwolf really cannot take a joke nor criticism
She also can't bother to do anything with any modicum of effort
I remember when Michael McCrudden did a Before They Were Famous on her. She acted so crappy about it (not as bad as PewdiPie did), it showed her true colors.
you mean SS-SniperWolf? 😂
I'm going to come out and be as blunt as possible. SSSniper'wolf's ENTIRE internet personality is "she's hot". She's basically only famous for being "that one eye-candy reactor girl". I mean no disrespect to her for this. I am not saying that is all that she, as a person, is, I'm saying that this is the entire basis for her entire online fame. It certainly doesn't come from any actual effort, or quality of content, on her part.
RUclips is not really the best place anymore to report bad content creators who dox or threatened others with real intent. However they will gladly ban, remove your monetization, if you use a fair use video/image or even make a joke of how sensitive RUclips higher ups are.
Sadly both sssniperwolf and her sister have a history of this and and bullying/harassment, all the while being hypocrites.
It was confirmed both were there.
For real. SSSniperWolf complained about being followed and harassed IRL, then doxes and harasses IRL. With the defense of: I'm just a dumb girl, I don't know what doxing is, you're defaming me, Jack!
as well as a criminal record of violent crimes
That's what happens when you have no realistic perspective on the world. She's spent most of her time in fame surrounded by people that probably treat her like she's a god, like she can do no wrong. That's why she sounds like she stopped mentally developing when she was in her mid-teens.
And sadly, the simps in suits at RUclips have never punished her for it
They things she does just makes it easier to pursue her even when what has happened is questionable.
SSSniperwolf says she “didn’t intend for this to happen.” UGH! SO tired of people using that for an excuse, when they are the ones that set things in motion. There’s a reason it’s called the thought “process.”
Also, actions have consequences. It's absolutely baffling that people just do not understand that.
with "this" people saying that usually mean "getting backlash from it".
I don't know. I can quite easily believe that she isn't capable of understanding consequences of any kind.
@@Anon2767Sadly, that doesn't seem far fetched.
Also, she's acting out the dumb so hard, but she's got over 30 million subscribers on RUclips, and is chronically online. Doxxing is a BIG part of internet culture, there is exactly a 0% chance that she didn't know what was she doing when she interacts with internet culture ALL the time. She was mad that Jack took a jab at her and knowingly crossed an uncrossable line specifically to cause as much harm as possible.
I hate how she says “she doesn’t know how to dox.” Ignorance is no defense of the law. Simple as that
“I don’t know how to use a gun!” Will soon be the new version of her “excuse” let’s not even talk about her outright stealing another creator’s full identity. INCLUDING THAT CANADIAN RUclipsR’S MOCKING OF THE REAL TORONTO ACCENT SHE GREW UP AROUND!!!! TORONTO ACCENTS ARENT FROM ARIZONA, THE UK OR THE STATES WHAT SO EVER! ITS A CANADIAN ACCENT SO SPECIFIC TO THE CITY OF TORONTO!!
Depends. There are some laws and crimes where intent does matter (as displayed when LegalEagel talks about harassment and its meaning), but this is NOT one of them.
I hate that quote...its selective.
People like cops can do whatever tf they want
@@PowerKnowing Exactly … "ignorance is no defense" is only generally true regarding ignorance of the law. "Your honor, I didn't know that it's illegal to shoot people." would not fly . (this is not legal advice)
Her argument sounds dumb regardless. She did dox him so she obviously knows enough about how it's done.
People are too fixated on the "doxxing" angle. This isn't a matter of releasing personal information, it's a physical threat. No different than "be careful what you say, I know where you live"
Yeah. It’s commonly noted that threats of violence can have the same psychological impact as violence
Genuine fear of harm is harm. So when you threaten someone there is legal responsibility regardless if you meant it or not
As far as I can tell, she never threatened him in anyway. Well, I suppose showing up at his home could be considered a threat, though in this case it's not a legal threat.
@@Soulsphere001 Yeah but she seems like the kind of person who'd have an army of let's say... unconditionally loyal fans, the most insane of which might potentially be motivated to take action.
@@CoalOres
"Seems like"? It would be nice if you knew one way or the other rather than stating that "she seems like". Though you could, very well, be right. I mean, I guess it's a similar thing to what former president Donald Trump did back on January sixth, and even before that, at the capital. I don't think Trump meant any harm, but he was pretty dumb not to realize that some of his fans were going to cause trouble. So, yeah, she has the capability of causing Jacksfilms quite a lot of harm (whether or not she means to).
Yes it is. Especially these days.
Especially important to note, on her livestream people note "oh they have doordash they might come out" and then on Jack's stream, Erin goes "is she the one who got us food?" So she literally tried baiting them out with food to fight. Psycho move, literally hunting them, especially knowing her public record of Armed Robbery charges.
hearing a lawyer say "it was kind of a dick move" was something i didn't know i needed to hear
Same. I was surprised, but it felt right
18:32
@@Gearrion Many court cases are decided by opinion, my friend. "Based on intent" is opinion because people lie. But if a judge declares SSSniperwolf guilty of doxxing because in their opinion, she had ill intent, that's all that is needed. The other side could be stated too. She can be found innocent or the case dismissed because of the OPINION that she REALLY DIDN'T have ill intent. So opinions can definitely mean a lot.
@Gearrion You do realize that opinions on morality are why the law exists to begin with, right? The only reason murder is illegal is because we collectively agreed on it. If opinions are worthless then your only system of morality is might makes right, which I'd love to see you defend when someone mightier than you decides to screw you over.
It was the most diplomatic way to stay on RUclips’s good side. “I could say what she did was illegal, but I won’t, because… money… and I don’t want her to come for me next.”
I would say this is quite different to the Streisand situation because of the intention. The photographer wasn't targeting her. Sssniperwolf was specifically targeting Jacksfilms. Even taken in best possible faith it's still insane behaviour to show up to someone's house unannounced because of an internet feud.
In the middle of the night
What we learned from this whole situation is RUclips is a disgusting company and as long as you’re big enough no matter how talentless you are you’re above all rules.
Replace "RUclips" with "The USA" and "company" with "society"
@@nexussaysyeah that too 😅
Technically we're all talentless since "talent" is a social construct. What she actually is is insecure and skilless.
She’s not that big thoguh. Doesn’t seem like the explanation
That's not really new news.
The things that piss me off the most:
1. RUclips has unfairly promoted her even though all her content is theft
2. They have multiple times held off on copyright strikes to give her time to remove sections of videos before the strike hits. Something NO OTHER CREATOR GETS!
3. They have banned creators for JOKING about doxxing creators and staff. And they just demonetized her “temporarily”.
4. She began uploading all her videos to an alternate, monetized account, which is avoiding the monetization ban. This is a terminable offense in RUclips’s TOS, and yet, with 2 terminable offenses she is still on the platform.
Makes me glad I’ve been cross-posting to Rumble and Odysee already, so when the exodus happens, I’m ready. Because this is yet another straw on the camel’s back, and a couple more could break it
Companies are always going to give people who make them money more leeway that others. That's business for you. Also, wealthy people can generally get away with significantly more than others can. Welcome to Earth, where the bottom line is usually more important than anything else.
The doxxing that she did was perfectly legal, which is probably why they didn't ban her. Plus I imagine it's better, though I'm not entirely sure, to legally dox someone than make a joke about illegally doxxing someone.
@@Soulsphere001 you don’t know if actual doxxing is worse than joking? Read your sentence again
@@OctagonalSquare
There's a difference between joking about illegally doxxing someone and legally doxxing someone.
It's basically like killing someone in self defence versus making a joke about murdering someone, though that's an extreme example.
Name of the alt channel, to destroy it
You Need Minds Website 💡
I think the main difference between Streisand and this case is the audience. Sssniperwolf has documented how absolutely insane some of her fans can be. It wouldn't be much of a reach to say her audience has a much higher likelihood of following through with malicious action due to having access to that small bit of information. At that point, she should be held partially liable for setting up that situation
The bigger difference between this case and the Streisand case is that the photo wasn't even labelled as being Streisand's house.
The photographer was documenting erosion along the coast and took a lot of photos to show the current state of erosion. One of the homes in this collection of photos just so happened to be Streisand's house.
But nobody knew this until Streisand kicked up a big fuss about it.
Someone also did show up at Jack's house and take more pictures and post them online
@@Stoshnut Which only would happen because Jack is Barbara Streisand
@@mattbosco2178 Nope, SSSniperwolf said it was Jack's house. The photographer that took the picture of Streisand's house didn't label it as such. Noone knew it was Streisand's house until she brought it up.
also, that photographer wasn't beefing with streisand beforehand (i think). to do this in the context of an argument IS an act of intimidation, especially with the added context of her sister making it pretty clear they wanted a fight.
Me, showing up to somebody's house uninvited in the middle of the night: YOU'RE HARASSING ME
If she had a legitimate harrassment claim, she'd have taken him to court.
Sniperwolf’s sister’s tweet made it clear to us that their intent was in fact to cause jack and his family harm
Her sister tried to assist but really dug a deeper hole
The tweet itself made it clear. There's literally no reason for her to post that photo if not to cause him harm. There's literally no reason for her to even take the photo to begin with.
@@Someguyhere111exactly. “Just wanting to talk” doesn’t require posting someone’s house on your popular RUclips channel.
@@chunkycornbread4773 she could have knocked on the door and had a conversation without her online buddies.
I’m not saying it would be right, but it would be braver than sniping electronically and running
Honestly, work. Why should Jack feel like he can just run a hate campaign with impunity? You don't think it's endangering her to push this incel content for MONTHS at a time, creating an obssessive narrative around her?
The Streisand case doesnt seem like the best or even most fair comparison. The photograph of her house was documenting the coastline and it just happened to capture Streisand's house; SSSniperwolf published the picture with malicious intent and, as evidenced by her earlier story, she was aware it was intentional.
Yep, SSSniperwolf was attempting to weaponize her fanbase at worst, and intimidate Jack at best. She's an actual bad actor.
I was thinking this same thing. Not an apt comparison
Agreed - posting something that happens to be someone's house is what Google Maps vans do, but taking photos of someone's house BECAUSE it's someone's house is the kind of thing that gets journalist photographers banned from the industry and sued for millions. Worlds apart, imho.
And she mentioning where she found it
Damn, I should have kept scrolling because I commented this above in response to a comment because I hadn't seen it mentioned. That really bothered me.
I see two important differences between the Streisand photo and this case: 1) 'legitimate purpose': the photo which happened to include Streisand's home was part of a survey of the California coast; this one had no purpose *other* than to harm Jacks; 2) 'private information': had it not been for Streisand's own actions, her home would have just been one unlabelled dwelling in a series of photos; this picture was distributed clearly labelled as belonging to Jacks.
Also, some of her fans have been to Jack's house since and posted from his yard which would not be happening except for her actions. How long until one of these fans is an actual psycho and decides to go into the house with violent intent? What she has done has caused jacksfilms to be rightfully scared for the safety of his family. SSSniperwolf needs to GO!
@@jaredmundi3599even if it’s not someone going psycho, it’s still invading privacy and depending on where they go, trespassing. It’s still very negligent on her part and encouraging harassment as she hasn’t said anything to the effect of people stopping it only that she was ‘sorry’ and that what she did was wrong
@@jaredmundi3599 Gavin from Slow Mo Guys comes to mind. Really bad shit can happen to internet celebrities when unhinged fandom people are involved. As a normal person, it would freak ANYONE out to have people essentially scoping your house out from across the street even. She knew what she was doing. A person doesn't do something like this unless they wanted to start some real bad shit.
What's sad is there is no actual reparation if say.. he and his family feel so unsafe that they need to move. People like Sniperwolf are predators by proxy, i.e. weaponizing her fans.
@@TheSwauzz Yeh i agree completely! This is why she needs to be scrubbed from the internet, and let that serve as a warning to others that doxxing is completely unacceptable. As it is and the way its been handled is pathetic, and doesn't address the larger issue which is that NOW people are thinking that doxxing is not so bad of a thing to do, because this idiot has basically gotten away with it scot free @youtube
@@TheSwauzz What happened to Gavin?
this is a classic case of outdated law. I agree she may not meet the requirements to be illegal but she still needs to be punished for violating jacksfilms online privacy and vaguely threatening them so she at least needs a misdemeanor (also promoting her fans to get his address saying its easy to find) and unlike the California coast one she took the picture purposefully at the house
Nothing small would likely charge her behavior. It would be awesome if we had an education system that taught ethics and if we also had repercussions where young adults and teens have to attend several classes on ethics, empathy, and trying to open their minds a little about the fact that everything isn't a joke and words/messaging can be very dangerous and it doesn't hurt to spend a moment critically thinking about your actions.
It's not new but this sort of personality is weirdly popular and often operates under the its just words, memes, etc. Even while saying and promoting dangerous or horrible things way worse than a slap or a punch.
"She may not meet the requirements to be illegal but she still needs to be punished for violating jacksfilms online privacy and vaguely threatening them so she at least needs a misdemeanor"
Do I agree that she should be punished? 100% yes. But if her actions don't meet the requirements to be illegal they can't just give her a misdemeanor. That's just not how that works. Either she committed a crime or she didn't
So I wanted to make a comment about how Sssniperwolf didn't just post a picture of Jacksfilms' house to her story. It was actually a video where she was saying how Jack should be out any minute and how she ordered ice cream to his house to try and lure him outside. Her sister also made tweets asking if Jack didn't know how to fight or something.
This needs to be more known, everyone is under the impression that it was just a photo.
What the actual heck she's psychotic. Thanks for sharing this.
WHAT?
Also a later photo captioned "we show up to your house what do you do?"
@@KidderRachel
Yeah, it was a video, not a picture. The only creator that mentioned it was a video, at least that I've seen, was Tyler Chou.
A few facts you missed out here: Sniperwolf's sister (who was allegedly with her) posted on twitter that they intended to "fight him". Sniperwolf's fans have continued to repost the image of his house, including a full address, on twitter. They have also doxxed a few other RUclipsrs who have spoken against Sniperwolf. Jack and his wife have not been home since the incident and have been on vacation away from their home, we have no way of knowing if them returning to their home may result in any sort of harmful action towards them or their property. Also, Sniperwolf has posted videos before of her talking about fans following her to her house, so there's a case to be made that she knew exactly what she was doing. Not to mention, she's also been arrested and convicted for armed robbery, which pair that with the tweets from her sister, paints the situation in a different light.
i've also seen that she supposedly owns a gun and goes to a shooting range
if this is true then jack most definitely had every reason to be afraid
This and some other comments to this video tell me that LegalEagle did not do a very good job of gathering the facts of the case before posting this video. I sincerely hope he creates an update to it adding the additional context.
@@zelandakhniteblade5436 Depending on how recently these came to light, the video may have been finished before they were known. News moves fast on the internet, and unless you're making videos that reach the incredibly high standard of quality Sssniperwolf's videos meet, it can take too long to properly address updates before publishing a video.
@@zelandakhniteblade5436 This is a legal explanatory channel, not an investigative channel. He explained the law.
@@aaronleverton4221 Legal conclusions depend on the specific facts and evidence of the case. Many of these were left out. Since they are relevant, an update would seem to be in order. This was done on some other cases where additional information came to light subsequent to shooting and even in one famous case within a single video as events unfolded in real time.
I think a big difference to note with Streisand's home is that visitors to the website might not have even known it was her home until the lawsuit took place. SSSniperwolf explicitly noted that the home shown belonged to Jackfilms.
This is a very salient point. Taking a picture that incidentally shows someone's home is very different from livestreaming someone's home and clearly stating who the house belongs to
Exactly this. There wasn't any history of online beef in the Streisand case, where it can easily be shown that what she's done here was done to incite fear in Jacksfilms and potentially violence among her fan base. It is not even close to being the same.
Yes. At the time, no one, not even the photographer, knew that was Streisand's home until she sued. Sniperwolf explicitly stated that this was his home.
@@jaredmundi3599 Even with all that, it doesnt come close to the definition of doxxing under the law in california, the outside of your house is not private property... Google proved that with google street, you wont get away with saying that, and you need to know the ramnification of stupid legal arguments, the only way sniper could be in danger legallly, is if she has said to anyone, that she was hoping something bad would happen to jack, it doesnt matter if they feel fearful of their life, if all she said was, i wanna talk ,even if WE ALL know its bs way of wanting to talk, legally , you cant just ignore the evidence, because you know deeper context, because then thats precedent for a lot of people getting in trouble for dumb stuff
@@areadenial2343and physically going there at night no less to confront the person on camera
The scary thing is that she has a criminal record for armed robbery. Someone known to have guns turning up at your house like that should be taken a serious threat.
PARDON?!?!
@@NylaTheWolf yep. Google it. Her mugshot is out there
@@NylaTheWolfYeah, she has two in fact. One from July 22nd 2013 for armed robbery and the second from August 12th 2016 for disorderly conduct - fighting
Jack has been completely silent about this. It could mean he’s pursuing legal action against her. If he is, every lawyer he contacts will tell him to stop discussing the case publicly.
Hes probably busy hiding under his bed shaking in fear over the big bad sniper wolf lol.
@@nullakjg767are you 8 years old
@@nullakjg767how many fake shill accounts does it take to defend one youtube loser?
@@nsahandlerI don't understand why she has so many simps. She's like a 3/10. I'm being generous XD
@@ZarChasmOfficialI know you are just making a joke but try to not attack her appearance. It sends the message to her fans that people are jealous of her or just mad at her appearance. She committed a crime and needs to be punished for her actions regardless of her appearance or gender.
So because he called her out on stealing people's stuff she thinks its okay to go to his house and show his address to her literal MILLIONS of followers? How does she not think shes in the wrong here?
A house of a 'creep', that is 'willing to harasses' women, makes it seems she was trying to find a white knight to do her work for her
she didn't show his address she showed a picture of his doorway and that is it
@@houseofaction That's almost the same thing, and it wasn't just his doorway. It was the front of the building, she also intimated that it's in LA near a studio she was using
@@arthasmenethil5752 I'm curious. How much are you being paid as Sniperwolf's PR guy?
@@houseofaction you do know how easy it would be to get the address from a picture of the front door alone? people can post a random picture of a tree and someone can track down the exact tree's location; how much easier do you think it is to track down a house?
“I’m sorry for what your going through” is not a apology. There is no taking blame or responsibility for your actions in that statement.
yeah, it's what you say when someone's going through a hard time because of something completely unconnected to you.
"I'm sorry for what I made you go through" would be more accurate, she can't even take some blame
I'm pretty sure that's taken from an unrelated video. I don't think she's made a video apology for this.
He should apologize for make content mocking her. He is the one escalating the whole thing. That's harassment.
she said it with a smirk too, giving the impression that shes not sorry at all
Her sister has gone forward to say they both intended to cause physical harm to him.
I like how she "wanted to talk like adults" and then never did anything to have an actual talk, just posted the creepy threatening video and left.
She ordered DoorDash to try and bait him out. They refused the delivery and wouldn't open the door.
@@redisthecoolestcolour if talking was what she wanted she could have knocked on the door. Still creepy, but a lot better than everything else she did.
I have to wonder what "adults" she knows that "talk" this way. If the "adult" conversation you want to have over a conflict can't happen at a coffee shop or by telephone, it should be happening either through a lawyer or not at all.
Welcome to Gen Z!
She ordered food to be deliver to their door, to bait them to go outside, tho
Most despicable is that yt is trying to put them on equal level.
"Hey, I found out you do videos talking about my mistakes!"
"But you came to my house and tried to bait me off my family's home!"
"But you are a MAN who says valid and hurtful things of a WOMAN, how dare you? Open your door! "Let's talk like adults" "
i have no idea why Jacksfilms thought it was a good idea to expend so much energy attacking another creator. he created a whole channel just to "document" Sssniperwolf's life. that is an unhealthy obsession, lmao
@@BikingWIthPandaExcuse me? Attacking? Do you even know about what he's doing? It's rhetorical btw, I know you don't know. Or know but don't really understand shii
@@BikingWIthPandaokay simp. On the other hand, doxxing IS a crime.
@@BikingWIthPandaI get where you're coming from, but Jacksfilms wasn't really documenting her life. He was dedicating his time to crediting creators who felt cheated by SSSniperWolf. Many people came to him with stories about how their content was stolen and seemed to feel like someone was on their side. The bingo card game may have been purely to poke fun at her, but that isn't a crime, nor was it simply an excuse to watch her content. Whether you agree with his way of going about it or not, I wouldn't necessarily call it an obsession.
Illegal or not, it IS against youtube's TOS, and they are just ignoring the problem till it goes away.
It's so much worse, they're not ignoring it, they're actively endorsing and encouraging it. She is a featured creature at vidcon, she's a poster woman for RUclips and all her content is literally illegal.
Their terms are more like suggestions.
I've literally been told that an account with my real first and (uncommon) last name on it doesn't count as impersonation.
I know it was a typo, but calling her a "featured creature" is very funny and fitting@@phelan8385
What the "creator" in this case is doing is also outside the terms of "fair use", so I'm surprised she hasn't already been hit with multiple DMCA takedown notices. Many Twitch 'personalities' who do exactly the same thing have been removed from that service, for things like just watching an entire anime while they appear in a tiny box in the upper corner. Being objectively hot shouldn't mean you get to flout copyright law.
debatably illegal* transformative is in the eye of the creator or judge if it gets that far. @@phelan8385
I'd be wary of anyone whose online handle starts with "SS"
😂
*whose (sorry 😅)
@@TruthNerds That's fair, I screwed the pooch there. lol.
It seems like posting photos of a coastline to coastline enjoyers is a bit different than posting someone's house to a crowd that's both angry at JacksFilms and desperate to get SSStalkerWolf's attention.
Seems like very important context.
Please don't change her name to something softer. The name she chose is SS Sniper Wolf, in other words she considers herself a nazi and an assassin. She's not some innocent "stalker" she's an SS Sniper, and let's highlight that whenever we can, so there will be no confusion about her intentions and her ideology.
@@gladtobeangrynah, that's too much thought. She stole the name from a video game character, Sniper Wolf, from Metal Gear Solid, and added more letters to the begining so it wouldn't be exactly the same. Kind of like how she steals content and adds the bare minimum "reactions" to pretend it's fair use.
Yeah.
It's a bit crazy to me Devin didn't take this into account.
If there are millions of people looking at the picture of a house, SOMEONE will find it. Never underestimate obsessed people.
@@krisd5697 Goat response
While the context is important in determining the law, and that argument may be important to fight to establish new precedence, I think the lack of bringing it up shows that it would likely fall flat in front of a judge.
Mentioning the imminent action and lack of previous harassment also points out that the argument would fall flat as that would be contrary to a "willful and knowing" action.
I love your content LE, but I feel like you missed, left out, or altogether ignored some context. I’m like 99% sure that she has a charge for armed robbery on her record, not to mention that her sister messaged Jack “what, you afraid to fight a girl?” when Sniperwolf was there & he wouldn’t come outside. I’m pretty sure there is a legal basis for making the claim that he was in fear of immediate physical danger. I think that proves they had malicious intent and knew what they were doing. She’s 31 and a resident of the internet for many years. She knows what doxxing is, and in addition to that, she knows how damaging and dangerous it can be for a public figure. Pretty sure one of her friends has been doxxed. With all the context put into place, I think it’s disingenuous to make this video and not look into all the important prior context, that, when put together, makes a clear line of culpability pointing right back at Sniperwolf
She might not have been intending violence, but she was certainly intending him to believe she was (at least jokingly) threatening violence. And she knew he knew about her criminal record.
And obvs that also means she knows the law about this sort of thing pretty well, and we can assume that millions of followers means she knows the terms of service well as well. But I get that LE had to leave some bits out and keep it open-ended etc as always, it spells out the "if X then Y" and we can fill it in ourselves based on the obvious evidence.
Well that somewhat changes my belief that she could have gone over without filming or taking pictures for clout to actually talk to him like adults. Definitely could have just emailed to discuss.
Sadly, what I take from this video is that unless physical harm comes to Jack and Erin as a result of the dox, a lawsuit would not have much weight. And as any stalked person knows, that is the scariest realization.
He always does this. Most of his videos do this. He always leaves out shit and uses his “lawyer” image as a front
Not to mention, his use of the Steisand Effect as precedent is tenuous at best because the whole issue there is her house wasn't labeled in the photo. It was just a photo of the coastline, IIRC, and her house was visible but nobody knew it belonged to her until she made a big fuss. SSSniperwolf spefically said this is Jack's house. Not the same at all.
Her apology is SO obviously a statement from a PR professional, rather than her being sincere about it.
Either that, or written with GPT.
Not to mention she couldn't even get the name of the person she's apologizing to right TWICE and still hasn't edited it is just appalling.
It's ChatGPT, can't even spell his name right.
Oh, that is most indeed a boilerplate "sorry, not sorry; sorry I got caught" PR apology written by someone else, meant to sweep things under the rug. I'd be willing to bet that the only reason there was even an "apology" was because RUclips said to put one out in order to get her little slap on the wrist.
professional my ass
I think jacks does actually have a case here because during the situation sssniperwolfs sister was posting on twitter talking to jacksfilms about how she wanted to fight. And then stopped after a couple hours before likely deleteing them (probably at the dying request of their pr team/lawyers
Setting aside the doxxing, can we agree that showing up at someone's house unannounced demanding to talk is something I would expect from a crazy ex-girlfriend that refuses to move on. If you swapped the genders of the people involved, I doubt we'd be talking about demonetizing videos, and be talking about restraining orders and criminal stalking.
That's what I was thinking when I first heard about this situation.
It is weird to me that the "stalking" aspect wasn't really touched on in this video. I'm sure criminal stalking is hard to prove off of one big incident, but showing up at someone's house in the middle of the night, streaming a video of it, and trying to get them to come outside, especially when they're someone you're not on good terms with, is definitely a major issue. Like you said, if the roles were reversed this would be playing out very differently and the police would likely have been involved immediately.
No. We can't agree. Showing up to someone's house isn't stalking or crazy. At worst it's rude.
@@Gamer3427 It's a serious issue morally, but showing up and posting a photo (then likely leaving) wouldn't constitute any stalking when it's a one time incident (as you mention). The police wouldn't be able to do anything if the roles were reverse - at most they'd just speak to both parties and tell them to just avoid each other.
Absolute dick move, as is standard with her, but nothing illegal (yet).
@@sloppyjoes7 it might not be THAT big of a deal but it's much more than rude. It is definitely crazy, scary and intimidating.
Claims she "doesn't know how to dox" but has been in court documents where she ruined a dude's life by claiming he was an SO and posting his personal info including address in her comments
Objection: The Streisand case and this one aren't comparable because Streisand's mansion was part of a photo set over a coastline, with no identifying factors attached. Jacksfilms' house was mentioned in an Instagram story showing she was planning to go to it prior and then was attached to a vaguely threatening message, which came with clear intentions in a conversation with SSSniperwolf's sister. This is blatant malicious intent, and I'm not sure how you don't get imminent threat out of his reaction on the livestream. Even if the threat has passed, that doesn't mean the threat of her coming back is gone.
Precisely. Nobody knew it was her house until she said it in the lawsuit.
However SSSniperWolf said who lives in the house while filming it and while telling her millions of followers (who she does not know the mental state of) that he was a bad guy. Kinda seems real irresponsible and dangerous af.
Further, her fan base has access to the information as well, and while it might not be likely, it would not be absurd to assume one of her fans could show up or follow one of them leaving their home. Unfortunately, I think LE missed the mark here
reminds me a bit of chris packham in the new forest, someone set fire to his car in his home, its all well and good until someone takes this information too far, as to how people found where he lived I had no idea...
@@reed560Correction: Some members of her fanbase already HAVE weaponized this information and are calling for targeted harassment
I can’t remember the username but a few weeks ago, there was a Twitter user repeatedly posting Jack’s address in the name of popularity, and just today there was an Andrew Tate “parody” account that found his address AGAIN and posted it on Twitter with the intent of doxxing his phone number as well - their exact words were “your [sic] harassing a girl, you sexist bastard. I stand with SSSniperWolf!”
But SSSNIPERWOLF knows his address now! Who's to say she won't divulge it later if she felt like it?
Sssniperwolf:
-has criminal charges of assault and theft
-ignored a child who was dying and wanted to meet her
-doxxed JacksFilms then posted a joke about it on Instagram
- blatantly steals content from people and doxxed the person crediting them
- was sued by her Ex-boyfriend for faking her gaming videos (she looks down to find the space bar.....)
RUclips: "WherE dOEs sSsnIpPerwoof gEt heR vIDeO idEA"
*then saying Jack was part of the problem, even though he was doing what RUclips didn't*
A few extras:
-has a history of being homophobic
-brings people down
-makes fun of people who had work done, despite her obviously having work done on herself
-fat-shamed a girl
-Asked a minor to flash her
@@genericname2747 what.
@@laravioliiii2832 Yeah it was a whole thing. It happened on Omegle
There was a food delivery sent to their address that they didn't order at the time sssniperwolf was outside their house - regardless of if it was by her or a fan it was intended to get them outside of the house.
Jack and his family have fled the house in fear of what is going to happen and haven't posted anything to their channel after that video.
Her sister confirmed they where there to start a fight, sssniper has prior arrests for public assault and armed robbery.
The issue I have is both her and her sister repeatedly stated "his address if on google" - I fail to see how this isn't instructions for her fans to look up his address and Doxxing by proxy.
I don't accept the "lapse of judgment" seen as the next day she was braggin and joking about it. Also her apology says "thank you youtube for making me accountable, I respect the decision" - she breaks a different youtube TOS by trying to avoid demonetization / ban evading by posting videos instead to her second channel that hadn't be demonetised.
personally i think youtube creators (myself included) should be held to a high level of accountability. if Jacksfilms needs to have someone show up to teach him a lesson about attacking others, so be it
@@BikingWIthPanda so, just to double check.
Your saying "its ok to break the law because someone made fun of you"
You would be perfectly fine with someone turning up at your house to attack you (sone one that has been arrested in the past for attacking someone), then that person give your address to 5 million people (who are capable of who knows what) because they didnt like that you made jokes about them.
Not once did jack do anything other thsn point out how predictable sssniperwolf is and how much of a scum back move it is to not credit people AND to show how easy it is to credit people.
@BikingWIthPanda Honestly I know neither of these youtubers but there's a line you dont* cross with internet catfights and that's IT STAYS ON THE INTERNET. WTF kind of creep actually goes to your HOUSE? Out of line, PERIOD. Right up there with calling SWAT on streamers.
Jack’s wife was also heard saying something along the lines of “is that why there’s food” when she found out SSSniperwolf was outside. I firmly believe that bitch door dashed to his house to get him to come out. You can’t convince me otherwise.
@@tfkdandsvkc From what I understand they were both shittalking in this case xD but yeah bullying is bad.
I would love it if a judge somewhere ruled, "While your actions were not illegal, they were definitely a dick move."
"sentencing you for your bad vibes"
She has a criminal record for armed robbery
@@Haarschmuckfachgeschafttadpole specifically in the instance of the doxxing, is where the illegality is questionable. And that potential crime is what we are using in our hypothetical comedic scenario
Honestly, that is how I feel about Jacksfilms here. His actions of creating a secondary channel and maintaining an online persona where he continuously targets SSSniperwolf would be sufficient to make her feel uncomfortable -- anyone would in such a position. In that case, I would find it entirely understandable to react the way she did (though the potential threat he posed to her source of income could plausibly be the more significant factor here). Nonetheless, I think Jacksfilms was a dick for harassing her like a kid who annoys others around him to get what he wants. Be constructive, not destructive.
@@ezioauditore7636 well I guess she could have just gone to RUclips to take down the videos since they use her content-
Oh wait, it’s not her content.
The fact that she's still posting RUclips videos and turned off the comments on all her recent videos shows she is fully aware that what she did is wrong but doesn't want to read more hate
The last line in her apology where she "thanks youtube for holding her accountable" is so pathetically see through. She wasn't remorseful at all until she got in trouble, and the only thing she is thankful for is that she got a slap on the wrist instead of the ban she deserved
That apology smells of 'im sorry i got caught'
its PR 101; lip service. she makes it sound like she regrets her actions but you can bet she would do it again. it might also boost her popularity. i mean plenty of people who might not have known her now know the name sssniperwolf.
"Ban"? She doesn't deserve a ban, she deserves hard prison time.
I really like the part where legaleagle's graphics editor simulated her asking chat GPT for an apology speech.
It’s ok guys, she only made a severe and continuous lapse in her judgement!
The pettiness of highlighting illuminati's name on her grave stone in the exact style she claimed Legal Eagle's editors "stole" from her is uncanny 😂
I burst out in laughter when i saw that hahaha It was perfect!
It was a very clean jab, with an iykyk vibe. Stay classy, Eagle Team
*chefs kiss* Absolute perfection.
RIP never forget (her abuse and bulling and gaslighting)
I came here for this!!! 😂😂😂😂
I honestly thought you were going to bring up her sister literally saying "I'm confused, does he not know how to fight?" as evidence that they went to his home with the intent to harm him, as well as sending food with the intent to get him out to harm him, but okay yeah if we ignore those two things then I guess you're right
YouRube is always watching. Even now its eyes wander looking to defend sssniperwolf and the money she brings them
"lapse in judgement" I see where the AI is taking inspiration from
I would argue there is a difference between a photographer taking a picture of a coastline that incidentally has Barbara Streisand's home on it and Specifically and purposefully taking a picture of Jack's house, and labelling it as such as well as trying to intentionally goad Jack into coming out of said house all in front of a live audience.
One major difference between this and the Streisand case: the picture of Streisand's house wasn't labelled or distinguished in any way that would identify it as her house to a casual observer. The IG post of Jacksfilms's house _was_ specifically called out as his and his family's residence.
Another major difference was that the photo of Streisand's house didn't include a vaguely worded threat to "Come outside and talk."
Any reasonable person would assume going to someone house, taking a picture of it, and posting it online with the caption "Come outside" is a threat.
I don't think "being too dumb to understand the ramifications of your action" should ever be a legal defense
Especially if she’s 31 and a bunch of evidence implies otherwise anyway.
It's a very...Presidential...defense.
I'm pretty sure that's a law. You not knowing you were breaking a law is not a defence for breaking a law.
To play devil's advocate, it makes sense for children or people who literally have no idea what they are doing, insanity pleas, and things with mental health, I don't know, I am not a lawyer or a policy maker, and haven't had the need to look up the technical term for it.
On the other hand, when you have been on a platform and have suggested that you don't like stalkers and have had a following of 5 million people, somewhere in the 10 years she has had on RUclips, she should have had more than enough experience, either with the content she watches or with her personal life, to know what doxing is and if a reasonable person can't see that then we as a society should redo our thinking
And it's not like she's never committed criminal behavior in the past. She's had criminal records for Armed Robbery and Disorderly Conduct. She should know how the law works at least.
"You don't just need a legal team, you need an Eagle team"
I dont need a lawyer, but if i did, this line alone would have me sold
The fact that she tried to cry sexism the moment someone criticized her should not be ignored as much as it is. She and others like her are the reason people don't take actually genuine instances of discrimination.
I don't take discrimination seriously because I'm sexist.
@@mattbosco2178 good on you for being honest, unlike sssniperwolf.
@@nekoest That was actually a joke... demonstrating you cannot discern reality immediately before calling her dishonest, probably not the best argument.
@@mattbosco2178 Yea, because on the internet there are people a whole lot worse than just being sexist.
A statement that seems relatively normal, especially in text form when tone can't be discerned, will not seem like a joke.
You making a statement such as this, and using it to criticize someone else's judgement about an entirely different thing is not a sound argument.
"I can't stand a female RUclipsr getting more views then me" He didn't even mention Gender a single damn time which I just find funny.
Someone with a criminal record of armed robbery showing up to another's house uninvited should be seen as a threat and treated as such.
She's lucky she didn't get shot cause that's grounds for it
Exactly. It's not the non threat of a photographer taking a pic of the cliff your home sits on, and he doesn't have a following of people who love bullies and bullying or they wouldn't follow her.
Trump's 'nice people on both sides' has some so much damage to our civilized society. These people literally have been coming out of the cesspool ever since.
Along with his other criminal behavior that he too, does the reversal of blame, trying to make those who hold him accountable of criminal behavior, seem like they are victimizing him.
This is what they all are doing. Every bully in the country. Reversing the blame when they get caught doing wrong.
@@Pewpewmagoo
She was arrested... In the act. That means she did it.
@@Pewpewmagoo Even as a Sniperwolf hater and Jack supporter it still feels weird to call her a child molester. Even if that's the official definition I'm sure most people will instead think of actually physically touching somebody inappropriately. Yes, she definitely did wrong, and legally her Omegle videos qualify as creating/distributing CP. However, even as terrible as she is I don't think she's actually touched a child.
@@Aelda69 Nope, in the United States you are still presumed innocent until proven guilty even if arrested in the act of committing a crime. Note I'm not defending her, I'm advising you not to make moronic statements.
I disagree with the comparison with the Streisand case. Because it all came down to intent. The photographer was documenting the erosion of the California coast. Some of those photos happened to have the back of Streisand's house in them. Most people who saw the photos would not know that some of them had her house in them nor would anyone who even knew that it was Streisand's house. SSSniperwolf deliberately posted a picture of Jack's house and called attention to this fact to her Instagram followers.
@@Pochi1mate the law ain’t black and white or set in stone. jumping on trends without taking more time to look at nuance is gonna invite oversights like that
That's... exactly what was said in the video. The reason it was used as a comparison was just to compare the two situations and how one was setting a potential precedent. But that Sssniperwolf had a very different intent in comparison.
@@gho5trun3r68 You totally missed the point. Because LE literally said that because Streisand's house being published in a picture online wasn't an invasion of privacy, then Sssniperwolf's posting of Jack's house wasn't either. Check the 15:45 mark.
@@belinus7180 No YOU missed the point. Intent is the key issue here. Sssniperwolf wanted to chat with him. The address is public knowledge. It is already out there. The intent wasnt to find him that was already out there. The intent was to chat and hash out multiple month long beef. She didnt tell her fans "go get this guy" or something crazy. THAT is malicious intent. All she did was ask them if she should talk to him. No malicious intent, try again.
In the end the Streisand case will fit here too as even tho the picture is a bit more personal, there is no breach of privacy as she didnt peep through the windows, but took a street side picture of a publicly known building.
Perhaps dont make months upon months of videos shitting on a person and then play victim when they show up. If you dont have anything nice to say, keep your mouth shut. Simple as. That is old school life right there.
Both did dick moves. Jack by crusading against her and harassing her for months with those cringe videos, and her for the way she approached the beef settlement.
Notifications are off, good luck replying.
@@trollking6315well said
So, someone needs to sue her. For copyright infringement and harassment/stalking.
Intentional infliction of emotional distress too.
Elements missing in your vid:
- It wasn't just a photo, it was a livestream video and she ordered ice cream to his home to lure him outside edit: it seems that the ice cream thread is misinformation; there was indeed ice cream on his doorstep but it was not ordered by her
- She has a past history of charges for and literal jailtime for assault
- She also has a history of shady/gross treatment of minors
- She is 31 and has been on the internet for at least half that; she knows exactly what doxxing is AND HAS COMPLAINED ABOUT BEING A VICTIM OF IT
- Her sister has insinuated that the intention was physical altercation
- She released an "apology" that was pretty clearly written by someone/thing else; she didn't even write his channel name correctly!
- edit As added by a replier, she also is very openly dodging youtube's very lax restrictions by uploading things on a second, monetised, channel
@grimFelArt The animation of SSSniperwolf's apology starts with opening Chat GPT.
Past history should have no affect ever heard of double jeopardy
@@effbar2400 thats not how double jeopardy works
@@effbar2400 that is being tried for the same crime twice, but other laws generally take into account, criminal history, when evaluating circumstances of a different crime
the spelling of his channel is a moot point, no one wants to spell out 3 J's and when people talk about her channel you dont go around seeing people say SSSSSniperwolf, they just say sniper wolf, its not gonna change the understanding of who theyre talking about.
Slap on the wrist, and nothing is going to change. Nobody who follows her is going to stop, which is the only thing that might get through to this awful person. But no, she'll eventually jump from Jacksfilms to someone else, continuing the harassment that any of us would have been banned for, while her fans tell her how great she is. Why not? There are no real consequences. And RUclips should be terminally ashamed of that.
shes losing thousand of subscribers so 🤷♀
This is how it all starts when someone's ego is huge, she is testing the water to see what she can evade. She thinks she can do whatever she wants just because she is more popular. I hope this will be her last
Unfortunately they won't be because they're RUclips and Sniper makes a butt ton of money
@@mercedesswan7205 always falls down to money. The crappy things people will do for money smh
She doxxed a RUclipsr seven years ago by doing a false copyright claim forcing him to reveal his address. She then used the information to dox him and falsely claim he was on an SO register. The channel Comic Crow goes over the case and the resulting lawsuit.
When the RUclips drama finally crosses Legal Eagle's desk, you know sh!t has gotten real.
It got real when she weaponized 5M Instagram followers and doxxed him.
He's here to set the record straight with all these morons saying she doxxed him and broke the law-- not the case.
@@michaelrapaport4494except it is
And he sided with sniperwolf lol. jacks army of manchildren arent taking it well.
@@nullakjg767 Sniperwolf isn't going to sleep with you.
So it sounds like in California, sniperwolf did commit a crime
Lia's sister who was in the car at the time of the filming: "COME OUT AND FIGHT US, COWARD!"
Lia after getting in trouble: "omg i'm just a widdle girl what is dox it sounds yummy oh i iz sowwy."
She has doxxed in the past, she can't claim ignorance, and infantilizing yourself is just sad. I don't blame Jack for not returning home; you don't want to test the defense: "none of my followers murdered your kids so it's not illegal." If this was, let's say, Mr. Beast showing up at Stanzi Potenza's house and posting video of it whilst his brother tweeted "Hey girl, come out and fight!" I'm curious what RUclips would do. Would we see the #1 RUclipsr's instant fall from grace, or would RUclips want that sweet money so much, they'd ignore their own rules? How strong is the capitalistic greed?
You missed major pieces of the story.
1. Her sister confirmed on X/Twitter that she was there to fight Jack.
2. SSSniperWolf has a criminal record of armed robbery and has recently posted pictures of her gun online
3. Evidence came to light that she was involved in the sexualization of children
Also, I would have liked to hear if there is a possibility to create a class action lawsuit against her representing the creators she stole content from as well as RUclips for supporting her actions.
To add, there were people that showed up outside of his home afterwards, criticizing Jack as poor.
Agree. Also missed that time she doxed a critic, falsely claiming he was on the s*xual offender list. That sht can ruin a life. (Almost ironic, now that her predatory content surfaced)
So much key info AWOL :(
EnigmaHood if anyone's curious.
Edit: LE also missed the current lawsuit from her ex, which could cost her $$$ and could lead a reasonable person to think she might be unstable, esp AT THEIR HOME, trying to lure them out with a food order (she knew it was ice cream, shudder)
I really hope that this leads to more actions against her. She really doesn't deserve the fame and fortune that she's amassed from leeching off others.
They also had food ordered to his house in an attempt to coax them out.
#3 unfortunately is most likely irrelevant to this story. Yes it’s shitty, but it’s not exactly a direct correlation to her doxxing and probably gets glossed over.
1 and 2 though makes it A LOT worse in her case. Now Jack can have a better case of being fearful of retaliation, immenent harm, etc. because if someone brandishing a gun walks up to a door and “just wants to talk”, that’s a VERY easy case to make for direct harm which is outlined multiple times to be an exception to the 1st amendment.
What bothers me about this situation is RUclips isn’t above wrecking channels through demonetization and copyright strikes. And they have changed the entire landscape of the platform that drove creators away or drove them to rely on platforms such as Patreon.
SSSniperwolf blatantly breaks their ToS, and she just gets a slap on the wrist.
cash cow privileges
@FutboleroOfficial
She's definitely not feminist though...
@@scalesconfrey5739 I bet if any action targets specifically sniperwolf every fan of em will be screaming about any sort of discrimination they can think of.
Oh also about 5:10 is evidence of sniperwolf playing the "but I'm a woman" card
She's making that BANK for RUclips💰
@FutboleroOfficial Looolololol. Wow you are so far from the truth it ain't funny. Child I'm in my 40's, not some juvenile gen z/millennial basement dwelling game nerd. Most of my subscriptions are science channels or gardening. The only thing I know about Sniperwolf is that her channel always seems to be in the trending section of RUclips. I don't watch that trash like y'all young folks. But I know RUclips won't ban any channel that's bringing in money for them. It's not rocket science. Popular RUclipsrs = more cash for RUclips. Why ban your golden goose? No company did that ever.
My favorite thing about the whole situation is that after she got her temporary demonetization and said it was justified and that she accepted it... she then just took all her content and reposted it on another channel to monetize it again.
If I knew that a fellow micro-celebrity I was beefing with lived nearby where I worked, and I decided to meet up with them and hash things out, I would:
1) NOT announce publicly that I'm nearby;
2) Send a private message to the other content creator,
3) Offering to meet, NOT saying "I'm already outside your door,"
4) Get confirmation that they do want to meet, then
5) Meet in a public space SOMEWHERE ELSE, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD NOT IN FRONT OF THEIR HOUSE!!!
I can't believe she has the audacity to say "RUclips held her accountable" when apparently only that one video was demonetized, not her whole channel. Like, how is that being held accountable in any way? She just got a light slap on the wrist.
I agree. I also heard that she's reuploading her vids onto another channel that has monetization to avoid the punishment, but I don't have proof cause I don't care enough to check.
Her channel as far as I know has been fully demonetised, however it was just the new videos for a while
Yeah but you have to realize, to someone that is surrounded by people telling her how amazing she is constantly, what youtube did seemed very harsh to her, because she thoroughly lacks a realistic perspective due to her god complex.
@@saratoga6663 Better than I thought, but still nowhere near enough of a punishment I’d say. Going out of your way to show someone “I know where you are” after having a lengthy disagreement is not a thing that can be handwaived, and sets a VERY dangerous precedent.
Last I checked, her videos are there, but nobody can comment on them.
The “no one ever attacks the male react channels” thing bugs me so much. Jack’s been calling out non-transformative reaction videos for years.
I feel like she has a point though. The vitriol and intensity with which people are coming for her is something I have only ever seen done to women who the online world has decided are "bad ones", never the men. And I don't think Jacksfilms created an entire channel just dedicated to mocking those male reaction channels he criticised in the past.
I don't know this lady, I don't care about her content, obviously what she did here was wrong. But I am a bit baffled by this comment section's thirst for punishment after this video clearly and concisely outlined that what she did was not illegal, it was a violation of youtube's terms of service which justified the demonetization she got. Clearly, people want to see her suffer, see her destroyed over this, and I can't help but feel like it would not be this extreme if she wasn't a woman.
@@baguettegott3409RUclips put SSSniperWolf on a pedestal and promotes the shit out of her. He proportioned his criticism of her to the amount of damage she’s doing to the platform.
@@mattbosco2178 they’re livestreams and he puts in effort to credit the videos that she consistently fails to. He’s basically doing what he can to undo the damage.
You gotta keep in mind, RUclips is his job, so it’s pretty easy for him to make a lot of videos doing this, especially when he streams.
@@baguettegott3409Being technically legal doesn't make it acceptable, she got TEMPORARILY demonetized and BYPASSED the punishment, youtube has destroyed other channels for far less, she literally should have been destroyed ages ago like everyone else would if they did the same thing. If anything if she was a man she would already be long gone.
The 'woman get attacked more' card is weak as hell in this age. Do you have any idea why it appears that way?
If a guy wants to bring down a woman doing something wrong, he needs a stack of concrete evidence.
Men don't really have anything like feminists to blindly back them up.
If it's a woman making the accusation with no evidence at all, there are many cases where the accused is just immediately turned into the villain, and if they don't have rock solid defense on the spot by the time they do there's no point because they already lost everything.
So, there are so many cases where someone being "attacked for being a woman" ends up being "all the men doing the same thing just didn't get far enough to make as big of a splash when they fall"
@@baguettegott3409 "if it's legal, then it's moral, and the only reason to oppose it is sexism"
id like to offer my condolences to your parents. dealing with the head injury that made you this way must've been very hard
This is also someone who has been arrested for armed robbery. Yes, you heard that correctly, SSSniperwolf was once arrested for armed robbery, and this individual shows up at night outside your house and makes vague threats? You better believe I'd feel unsafe.
I'd be more concerned if she was actually convicted. Not to mention allegedly the incident was her being aggressive with a security guard over clothes at a store. She didn't whip out a gun and try to rob the store, but those actions "technically" go under armed robbery. So yeah, I highly doubt she is some ultra mega threat or anything. Add to this she posted online where she was and stated her intentions, so if her plan was murder that is absolutely ridiculous since you basically guarantee you're screwed in court if you follow through. She isn't someone who would go shoot or murder someone, she's just an emotional wreck who doesn't think straight. Just my perspective
@@GodofGoblins stop defending her she told minors to twerk for her, and she'd show them her "doubles"
@@GodofGoblins You don't have to directly have violent intentions to be threatening to someone. Dragging your social media fandom to someone's front door absolutely is an aggressive and intimidating action.
@user-mv5zt8qd9l well this is important when it comes to the legal aspect. It specifically states on California law that malicious intent must be proven to execute a punishment. Since that is incredibly difficult to do due to how everything went down, she is legally safe. We can talk morality all day, but court isn't going to care about that. All people can do is shame her actions and ignorance and move on
@@GodofGoblins Except there is a lot of legal precedent stating that due to people not being clairvoyant, you don't need to know someone wanted to harm another directly in order to establish intent. Lia running to his house to turn the cameras on for her social media following is intent. Her making veiled threats during and immediately after the incident is intent.
If you had to prove with zero doubt that someone wanted a certain result in order to prosecute, no one would be prosecuted.
This is another one of those situations that victims of stalking experience. They always say you don’t have a case until someone actually gets hurt at which point it’s usually too damn late.
I definitely don’t think she “didn’t know the ramifications of what she was doing”. This girl has armed robbery charges last time I checked. That seems like enough immediate danger to me.
Also… I feel like the fear of “immediate danger” could pretty easily be argued. I think a lot of people would come as witness
That puts lethal force on the table. SSSniperthief should be very, very careful.
Ssstalkerwolf is in her 30's. She's fully aware of what she's doing but thinks she's going to get away with showing up at the Jacksfilms' home and threatening to "throw hands" because she's never faced any consequences for her actions.
Out of curiosity. Wouldn't the fact that she stated in the original post she wanted to talk to him, make it different from the Streisand incident? Streisands house being photographed was incidental due to it's proximity to the coast and the photographer doing a legitimate surveying of the area.
SS SniperWolf - literally tried to instigate a confrontation by saying she wanted to "talk" to him with the post of his home. Which was not incidental, it was deliberate with intent. Does that not change the legality of it?
I feel like it could. Like, if I were to be playing geo guesser and Jack films house was in the video, it was zero intent of showing the home. But if I intentionally go to his home and post a video mentioning his name its obvious. And anyone can recognize that.
Now could it be argued me purposefully going up to not easily accessible information to post it online is not always malicious? Sure, however that heavily depends on the context as to what I was doing. Sssniperwolf posting it with "let's talk like adults" and constantly accusing jack (I know that's not his real name) of harassment and obsessive behavior could be argued that she was aware of any possible malicious actions taken against him by her fans. Because, its the internet and people have done a WHOLE lot more for a whole lot less. Swatting is a prime example. Almost killing people during a live stream, for what? A "joke".
Along with the fact that she had been beefing publicly with him to her millions of follower beforehand (not a part of Streisand’s story)
The Streisand house example was specifically about the accusation of "Invasion of privacy." Harassment is a separate allegation, and the Streisand example wouldn't really apply to it. Invasion of privacy is like someone's filming through a window in your back yard, that is not in plain view of the public, to try to see what you're doing. Sharing a photo/video of a house from a public street, in plain view by the public is protected by the first amendment and in no situation would be considered an invasion of privacy, otherwise for example paparazzi could not exist. Anything or anyone you can see from a public space, you can legally record.
I personally think the harassment accusation and doxxing have a lot of credibility, but the invasion of privacy doesn't hold water legally.
@@bardthief You can't just sue for harassment though thats the thing. There is no tort for "harassment." It has to be sexual harassment, racial harassment, etc..... Him suing wouldn't go anywhere at all really. She didn't really "doxx" him because the information she posted isn't really considered confidential and to prove intent there would be EXTREMELY difficult especially given the circumstances that LegalEagle himself pointed out here.
When an actual lawyer gets involved, you know things are starting to get real.
It's so infuriating because we have another classic case of "having to wait until something serious actually happens before we can do anything about it" on our hands here. Nothing meaningful will be done or change unless one of SSSniperWolf's lunatic fans actually shows up to Jacksfilms' house and attacks him and his partner.
Some of her fans have made "jokes" about how easy it would be to kill his dogs with poisoned meat. And RUclips is STILL acting like nothing is amiss here!
Considering her sister later posted a tweet stating something along the lines of “modern men are a joke, does he not know how to fight.”
I personally think the argument could be made that she clearly had ill intentions.
Why would her sister question his ability to “fight” if she only came there to talk?
Her prior arrest record to me totally justifies Jacksfilms reasonable fear. She’s been arrested for disorderly conduct (fighting) and armed robbery.
A) Her sister is allowed to have an opinion on Jacksfilm's masculinity. Doesn't mean you can prove Wolf's state of mind. Definitely doesn't mean you can infer her intention off of what someone else said or believes.
B) She was not convicted of either arrest. It's not something that could be used against her. She has no prior convictions.
@@KarazolaX the comment implies that they were intending to fight him, the sister and sniperwolf were also together at the time meaning even if sniperwolf didn't intend to do harm to jack her sister did
@@slowbro7944 ok? how many people a day talk about how much they want to hurt literally anyone, her sister wasn't present when she went to his house. she can't be held liable in any way for her sister's words.
@@KarazolaX sssniperwolf went to jacksfilms house with her sister that night
They lucky he not start blasting with those second amendment 🤷
RUclips's "behavior on both sides" is such a grotesquely idiotic and clearly-biased foot to stick in their mouth. We can read between the lines: "Jack unfortunately does not have a legal case against her which might have more luck in forcing our hand, and she still makes us more money than him anyway, so we're only to going to marginally pretend that we care, and shame on Jack for making us lift a finger." This lady is the poster child for folks in dire need of rude awakenings and humble pie, and if it can happen to other content creators, I see no reason why she should be immune to punishment and consequences for her actions. That arrogant childish nonsense needs to stop before she really gets someone hurt.
@@kyedaoh yeah where the person had criticized other people on these types of lazy reacting, having bingo card on things she constantly do with his fans, give the people who’s in her videos shout-outs, and telling them how to get their video removed from her videos because she didn’t ask for it.
@@kyedaSomeone hasn't read into this situation at all LOL
@@kyedashe won't sleep with you, grow up
It is insane her channel is still up and running. It's almost like youtube hates real content creators or something...