Bayesian Way | NEJM Evidence

This animated video explores two possible approaches to analyzing data in a randomized controlled trial: “Frequentist” versus “Bayesian.”
Explore the latest research published in NEJM Evidence, a new digital journal from NEJM Group: evidence.nejm.org

[@michaelg4919]

Amazing! Thanks for this short video. I am a big fan of your approach to summarizing science (like abstracts, statistics etc.) in an understandable yet concise way. Hopefully, one day, I'll be able to publish a paper in your journal :)

[@joelsteiger4439]

this script is amazingly written! great job!

[@anthonyrimicci7858]

Wow! That was great.

[@haonansun3355]

Well done!!! I enjoyed this video a lot!

[@GardenGuy1943]

I didn’t. It makes me rather upset. They need to TALK LOUDER.

[@joaopedrorocha5693]

That's amazing!

[@Polodus]

made my day!

[@delhitamil]

Enjoying Video

[@TiagoPereira-hm1nq]

Bravo!!!👏👏👏👏

[@NitaJain]

What if both the true difference and the data are variable? What approach is best in that case?

[@jackwalsh1468]

Hydrogen to fuel internal combustion engines. Zero Carbon Dioxide and only water vapor. This hits all the environmental check boxes and Net-Zero Carbon..
Even, Greta can't argue against Hydrogen power, logically