@@Rockhound6165 That part has been suppressed through training and brainwashing. Treating him like an ordinary person committing those crimes is immoral and irrational. But I agree with your comment, just to be clear.
the worst part was her objection was unnecessary. Kaffee did an excellent job of creating uncertainty regarding the reliability of the expert witness's testing, which resulted in the prosecutor's redirect. If you've caused the redirect to clarify some testimony given on cross-examination, then the defense did their job. And the prosecution's redirect was simply an appeal to authority, not at all worthy of her reaction. The prosecution was on the defensive and Galloway let them off the hook.
No. Because the witness is not impartial. Expert witnesses are meant to be impartial. This expert witness has a lot to gain by saying Santiago was poisoned. In any real courtroom he would not be allowed to be the expert witness, instead, both parties may be ordered to instruct a joint, impartial doctor as an expert witness.
The part that makes no sense is why the defense was not able to acquire an independent autopsy considering the medical examiner had a conflict of interest, in that the victim was a former patient of his, and the theory of the defense was medical malpractice.
Yeah, I wouldn't think too much about the logical flaws in this film. It's very entertaining and the courtroom scenes are fun to watch if somewhat unrealistic
But they didn’t need an independent autopsy. The existing findings proved exactly what they needed to know, that Santiago died from lactic acidosis. As the defence showed, poison wasn’t the only possibility.
Doctor here: in absolutely no way is that how lactic acidosis works. The body ALWAYS burns sugar, and if it can't it makes more, and if it can't do that, it burns ketones. All of these are functionally converted to electrons, which are then passed down the "electron transport chain" in a process called oxidative phosphorylation (which is ENTIRELY separate) from the burning the sugar itself. Normally, oxidative phosphorylation creates enough energy to regenerate the biochemical pathway required to burn the sugar. However, when oxidative phosphorylation stops (due to either lack of oxygen delivery to the cells or a poison like cyanide), the body resorts to scavenging as much energy as it can from the breakdown of sugar, and cannot regenerate the biochemical pathways. It is this failure to regenerate the pathway that causes lactic acid build up. So, perhaps a semantic argument, but either way, LACTIC ACID DOES NOT CAUSE THE LUNGS TO BLEED. False: coronary and "cerebral" (aka brain) disorders do not cause lactic acidosis, only depriving tissues of oxygen does this. Most common cause in a person who isn't poisoned or septic (widespread inflammatory response from infection) is actually a LUNG condition (asthma or COPD), but even then, the acidosis in this case is usually secondary to inability to adequately exhale carbon dioxide (which when dissolved is acidic) instead of lactic acid buildup. The only time a "coronary" condition would cause lactic acidosis is in the setting of cardiogenic shock secondary to either arrhythmia, massive heart attack, or cardiac arrest.
I saw this movie right before going in the Navy. This whole point came up when I was shipboard, and our Doctor said pretty much what you just explained. Thanks for setting the record straight.
Carl was eating donuts at the time this idea of what could have killed the pvt was being thought of...🤔 then again it could just be Hollywood trying to be smarter than everyone else
I guess I would have asked the doctor, What did Santiago's _autopsy report_ show? Did it show any significant evidence of heart disease? It did? So, upon autopsy, evidence of significant heart disease, no evidence of poison? What conclusions can we draw from that, vis-a-vis the lactic acidosis that killed the private? Would you like to reconsider your opinion to the court, doctor?
@@sliceserve234 actually no, the Dr already showed a tendency to obscure the fact. The correct action would have been to put their own expert on the stand, in the proper field and then ask those questions
@@stephenkennedy8305 but the expert wouldn't be able to examine the guy, so it would all be conjecture. I think the script did an interesting job of hiding the medical malpractice in plain sight. plus, had Santiago's medical condition been correctly diagnosed we wouldn't have a movie.
The witness is an expert with direct ties to the incident. Thats a clear conflict of interest. They need a civilian doctor or at least one from an entirely different station. This expert witness is just a normal witness.
In real life the trial would have never played out this way because the prosecution would be laughed out of court if they used "lactic acidosis" to prove that some unnamed poison was the cause of death. This kind of prosecution would proceed only if the toxicology report on the autopsy came back positive for a SPECIFIC poison found in the soldier's bloodstream. The defense could call a 100 doctors to the stand and all of them would testify that "lactic acidosis" is a very broad category and there are at least 10-15 causes for it, some of those causes evidence of homicide and many others accidental.
A lot of comments are about Dawson and Downey being 'thugs' and unflinching murder bots. Dawson was a Squad Leader. You don't get to that position without giving a damn about the men under you. HOWEVER, they were given a direct order by the brass. Of course they felt guilt. But they are programmed to kill when told to do so. And whoever said they intended to murder Santiago? They were just supposed to frighten him and have him 'fall in line'. It was hazing that went very wrong. This is one of the biggest conflicts in the film between Surherland and Cruise. In a way they're both right. This is why it was so vital for Jessup to be found guilty. The orders ALWAYS come from the top.
They were also obligated to object to an illegal order being given by their superiors. Otherwise, they wouldn't have been found guilty of "Conduct unbecoming a US marine".
The sorce of the whole thing was the guilty/incompetent doctor! He reported the kid was of fine health, giving everyone else the impression the problem with the kid was laziness instead of a really bad medical condition. He should have also been tried.
Surely you understand a teenager on a wall down in Cuba is protecting folks as far away in Anchorage? Kind of like how starting a war in Iraq enabled the US to find Bin Laden's hideout in Pakistan many years later.
You completely miss the point. It's not where they are, it's WHO they are. They are marines, and yeah, that's what marines do, they stand on that wall WHEREVER AND WHENEVER they are asked to, putting themselves in between us civilians and whoever might threaten us, many times at the hazard of their own lives. Jessup was clearly an asshole, and the villain in this, but his monologue about standing on that wall, and the code of honor, duty, and loyalty is spot on. There's a quote, I don't remember who said it, that is quite appropriate to this: "We sleep well tonight because somewhere rough men stand ready to do violence on our behalf." I know it's just a movie, but perhaps a bit more respect is warranted...
She's saying that in general about the Marines not just those at Gitmo. These men are willing to die to protect YOUR freedoms. I believe a bit of respect is deserved.
Great scene. 2 issues though. 1. The doctor has a clear conflict of interest. Just as Kaffee implies. Santiago was unfit, yet he gave him a clean bill of health. 2. Poison of some kind isnt conclusive evidence. So you cant say he was poisoned. All that the prosecution could say is that the actions of Downey and Dawson ended up in the man's death. Manslaughter. Not murder.
The human body does not "burn" oxygen. Oxygen is used by the human body to "burn" (oxidize) nutrients (such as sugar) to release energy for use by the body, e.g., for walking around.
Thank you. Aerobic respiration requires oxygen to release energy from respiratory substrates, such as glucose sugar. With an inadequate supply of oxygen, an anaerobic pathway can still release energy from the substrate but this much less efficient pathway will produce pyruvate which is then converted to lactate/lactic acid which can build up*. This is what the witness is trying to describe. In both the aerobic, and the anaerobic pathway, energy is released from sugar. An "expert witness", even one trying to explain things in simple terms for the court, would not be as clumsy as this. Indeed, I cannot fathom an expert in the field talking about "burning oxygen" in this way. A moment of poor writing in an otherwise brilliantly written film. *When/if oxygen becomes available later, the lactate can be converted back to pyruvate and the aerobic pathway can continue.
@@hernandv2000 He doesn't have the Destert Storm ribbon. The blue/white/red stripe in middle is marine corps security guard ribbon but he's not a marine. It appears to me they just put some ribbons together they though looked nice.
I ran 400 m track and the principle of my training was oxygen debt. Lactic Acid replaced oxygen in my muscles after about 300m so the idea was to run through pain and get to the line
As I have said before regarding this film I doubt it inspired as many to enlist in the military as Top Gun no cool fighter planes or hot for teacher romance just some guy getting murdered at boot camp because he had asthma and a sociopathic superior officer.
I think this scene touches a very delicate and sensitive ideology about some people like Lieutenant Weinberger who think Marines are bullies but at the same time Commander Galloway defend the Marines because they keep America safe! I never thought about it when I watched this movie when it first came out but after watching many times over, I realized this scene is very powerful!
Weinberger probably sucked at sports, so he probably was bullied for being slow when he was a kid, hence why he was more empathic, I know how he feels, I was bullied myself for running slow.
Galloway's reason for liking Dawson and Downey sounds just like Colonel Jessup's "you can't handle the truth" speech later. Not only is she incompetent, she acts like she's fighting the power for the lowly grunts, while making Kaffee take all the risk. She gets IA glory with Jessup's skin if Kaffee wins, and gets away scott free if Jessup doesn't take the bait.
Uh ... Top Gun: Maverick. Up until Maverick came out, I'd have said A few Good Men was his best movie. I can say, without any doubt in my mind, Maverick was a better movie.
This movie proves so well that women should learn to shut up listen to when a man is peaking, because they think with feelings and men think with reason and facts. )
It’s a movie people, maybe one of the best in the last 40 years! Who cares if they “stretched” the medical jargon. It’s fiction not a medical dissertation!
The writing is better if the details stand up to scrutiny. The scene is better if everyone is wearing the correct uniforms, appropriate medals and decorations, if the correct flags are placed in the right places etc.
Movies are really funny when it comes to courtroom scenes. Witnesses are asked questions, and they answer them. What you see in movies is BS. In this movie, the scene where Jessup is being questioned is completely ridiculous. He asks Kaffee almost as many questions as Kafee asks him!!
Pollack’s character said exactly why: there is a difference between paper law and trial law. Been awhile since I’ve watched the whole movie but IIRC this was Joan’s first trial. She was naive, inexperienced
@@toddfrank3344 I've written this in my other posts. She was mocking and berating Kaffee for his reluctance to call Jessup to the stand. Well, she's not the one who faces a possible court martial for smearing a high-ranking officer. She gets to go home and go on with her life while Kaffee's life is ruined. She also made numerous bonehead mistakes throughout the discovery phase and during the trial itself, and was dismissive of her own errors while never hesitating to jump on Weinberg or Kaffee anytime she felt they were too timid.
@@sean2015 Exactly. I loved the scene where a drunken Kaffee lets her have what she's had coming for the whole movie..but I hated it when he subsequently apologized.
Both Sam and Joanne are right and wrong I think. Sam is right in that a soldier who physically may not have been up to snuff was tormented. He also fails to recognize an order is an order. Joanne is right in these soldiers have the guts to do what they do but the ends didnt justify the means. Its a sad situation all around and no one fully wins in the end.
That happened twice that I know of too! When they are going to bring Jessup on the stand.. at the last moment, she said "dont do it if you think you cant". Wow, thanks a lot! Typical women lol
![[DRAGON BALL LEGENDS REVEALS ＆ STUFF] LEGENDS FESTIVAL 2024 Special Edition Part 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mV5bGIswTtQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Keven Pollack hit the nail right on the head when he told Demi Moore EXACTLY what he thought of Dawson and Downey.
EXACTLY MY THOUGHTS SIR!
I am in total agreement here. You are straight on point with what you said.
Yeah, I'm sure they did it for fun and not because they're trained attack dogs in human form..🙄
@@marty2090 I believe Dawson proved that he's a human being with feelings and a sense of right and wrong.
@@Rockhound6165 That part has been suppressed through training and brainwashing. Treating him like an ordinary person committing those crimes is immoral and irrational. But I agree with your comment, just to be clear.
She could have saved everyone some time and just said “because it’s devastating to my case!”
Because I... Can't... Lie!
the worst part was her objection was unnecessary. Kaffee did an excellent job of creating uncertainty regarding the reliability of the expert witness's testing, which resulted in the prosecutor's redirect. If you've caused the redirect to clarify some testimony given on cross-examination, then the defense did their job. And the prosecution's redirect was simply an appeal to authority, not at all worthy of her reaction. The prosecution was on the defensive and Galloway let them off the hook.
"Overruled."
"Good call!"
No. Because the witness is not impartial. Expert witnesses are meant to be impartial. This expert witness has a lot to gain by saying Santiago was poisoned. In any real courtroom he would not be allowed to be the expert witness, instead, both parties may be ordered to instruct a joint, impartial doctor as an expert witness.
The judge should have said “I strenuously overrule your objection!”
Lol. That would have been epic trolling!
Caffey pushed the envelope on every witness until he got what he was looking for. Solid
But it was ultimately stricken from the record. So no, not quite.
The part that makes no sense is why the defense was not able to acquire an independent autopsy considering the medical examiner had a conflict of interest, in that the victim was a former patient of his, and the theory of the defense was medical malpractice.
Agreed. On the other hand, it's a movie.
Yeah, I wouldn't think too much about the logical flaws in this film. It's very entertaining and the courtroom scenes are fun to watch if somewhat unrealistic
Military
It's a Court-Martial. Different laws apply.
But they didn’t need an independent autopsy. The existing findings proved exactly what they needed to know, that Santiago died from lactic acidosis. As the defence showed, poison wasn’t the only possibility.
4:35 love his smirk
who smirks?
Dr. Stone ... in your *_EXPERT_* 👀...
I know, I actually chuckled when I saw that for the first time. 🤣🤣🤣
This is such a great movie, so many epic scenes.
Doctor here: in absolutely no way is that how lactic acidosis works. The body ALWAYS burns sugar, and if it can't it makes more, and if it can't do that, it burns ketones. All of these are functionally converted to electrons, which are then passed down the "electron transport chain" in a process called oxidative phosphorylation (which is ENTIRELY separate) from the burning the sugar itself. Normally, oxidative phosphorylation creates enough energy to regenerate the biochemical pathway required to burn the sugar. However, when oxidative phosphorylation stops (due to either lack of oxygen delivery to the cells or a poison like cyanide), the body resorts to scavenging as much energy as it can from the breakdown of sugar, and cannot regenerate the biochemical pathways. It is this failure to regenerate the pathway that causes lactic acid build up. So, perhaps a semantic argument, but either way, LACTIC ACID DOES NOT CAUSE THE LUNGS TO BLEED.
False: coronary and "cerebral" (aka brain) disorders do not cause lactic acidosis, only depriving tissues of oxygen does this. Most common cause in a person who isn't poisoned or septic (widespread inflammatory response from infection) is actually a LUNG condition (asthma or COPD), but even then, the acidosis in this case is usually secondary to inability to adequately exhale carbon dioxide (which when dissolved is acidic) instead of lactic acid buildup. The only time a "coronary" condition would cause lactic acidosis is in the setting of cardiogenic shock secondary to either arrhythmia, massive heart attack, or cardiac arrest.
I saw this movie right before going in the Navy. This whole point came up when I was shipboard, and our Doctor said pretty much what you just explained. Thanks for setting the record straight.
A person who has had a seizure may not be able to think, walk, or talk for hours or more due to the lactic acid produced by the event.
I am a med student and was shocked about not knowing coronary disorders can cause lactic acidosis. Turns out my memory wasnt wrong
Carl was eating donuts at the time this idea of what could have killed the pvt was being thought of...🤔 then again it could just be Hollywood trying to be smarter than everyone else
I'm thinking Willie was on coumadin for a hx of pulmonary embolism, and Jessops clan confiscated it
I guess I would have asked the doctor, What did Santiago's _autopsy report_ show? Did it show any significant evidence of heart disease? It did? So, upon autopsy, evidence of significant heart disease, no evidence of poison? What conclusions can we draw from that, vis-a-vis the lactic acidosis that killed the private? Would you like to reconsider your opinion to the court, doctor?
Look, I know it’s on colour and everyfin ….. 😅❤❤
finally an intelligent youtube comment. thank you.
Man that damn doctor denied and still lied in front of everyone 🎉 love this movie!!!!!
@@sliceserve234 actually no, the Dr already showed a tendency to obscure the fact. The correct action would have been to put their own expert on the stand, in the proper field and then ask those questions
@@stephenkennedy8305 but the expert wouldn't be able to examine the guy, so it would all be conjecture. I think the script did an interesting job of hiding the medical malpractice in plain sight. plus, had Santiago's medical condition been correctly diagnosed we wouldn't have a movie.
I just realised that commander Stone is Spinal taps guitarist Nigel Tufnel.
His lungs went to 11.
Couldn't his lung have just worked a little harder and have that be 10?
@@danielovermyer9122 Marines at Gitmo go to 11.
@@danielovermyer9122 His lungs went to 11.
Brilliant!
But his went to ‘ eleaaavan’😂
..Удивительно-идеальный подбор актеров..-каждый сто процентов..-"на своем месте"!!🙏💕👍👍
The witness is an expert with direct ties to the incident. Thats a clear conflict of interest. They need a civilian doctor or at least one from an entirely different station.
This expert witness is just a normal witness.
Yeah serious plot hole. Defense would have never allowed the victim's Dr to testy.
This and Hollow Man are the two times I love Kevin Bacon getting his due at the end
bruh what about x-men
Sleepers easy
Tremors also
Hollow man was so bad
Sleepers?
In real life the trial would have never played out this way because the prosecution would be laughed out of court if they used "lactic acidosis" to prove that some unnamed poison was the cause of death. This kind of prosecution would proceed only if the toxicology report on the autopsy came back positive for a SPECIFIC poison found in the soldier's bloodstream. The defense could call a 100 doctors to the stand and all of them would testify that "lactic acidosis" is a very broad category and there are at least 10-15 causes for it, some of those causes evidence of homicide and many others accidental.
Dude had ALL those symptoms and was limited to running 4.9 miles at a whack. I haven't run 4.9 miles as a cumulative total for the last week.
I haven't run 4.9 miles as a cumulative total for the last decade.
it's a skill issue. you're pathetic
The doctor turns the volume up to 11 while listening to shark sandwich
Two different types of childhood trauma going head to head in those last 2 minutes.
A lot of comments are about Dawson and Downey being 'thugs' and unflinching murder bots. Dawson was a Squad Leader. You don't get to that position without giving a damn about the men under you. HOWEVER, they were given a direct order by the brass. Of course they felt guilt. But they are programmed to kill when told to do so. And whoever said they intended to murder Santiago? They were just supposed to frighten him and have him 'fall in line'. It was hazing that went very wrong. This is one of the biggest conflicts in the film between Surherland and Cruise. In a way they're both right. This is why it was so vital for Jessup to be found guilty. The orders ALWAYS come from the top.
They were also obligated to object to an illegal order being given by their superiors. Otherwise, they wouldn't have been found guilty of "Conduct unbecoming a US marine".
The sorce of the whole thing was the guilty/incompetent doctor! He reported the kid was of fine health, giving everyone else the impression the problem with the kid was laziness instead of a really bad medical condition. He should have also been tried.
They don't make great movies like this anymore
Tom Cruise >>>
Damn Kevin Pollack is good
Super underated. He doesnt get enough roles. What a waste of talent. Dude is versatile.
Why is Bacon's objection sustained? The doctor has a clear conflict of interest.
You see what Merchan, Engoron, and Chutkin did to Trump and you still don't know?
And y’all accuse *Democrats* of having Trump derangement
Because it was Kevin Bacon gosh darn it. Didn't you see him dance in Footlose?
Badgering the witness. In a real situation the lawyer would highlight the conflict of interest in a lot less dramatic and accusatory fashion.
I could see this being connected to the top gun movie. Maverick when he just joined the Navy.
Kevin Pollack was right, they tortured a kid, thats all this is... I wonder if Demi got that stand on a wall BS line from Bruce Willis. 😂
Well, you're too much of a coward to stand on any wall so there's that.
Surely you understand a teenager on a wall down in Cuba is protecting folks as far away in Anchorage?
Kind of like how starting a war in Iraq enabled the US to find Bin Laden's hideout in Pakistan many years later.
Not Bruce Wills - Jack Nicholson/Col. Jessup 😂
Her character was salivating over Col, Jessup, she likes the bad boys.
Certainly not from HER brainwashed libtard mind.
Great acting ; amazing
"Cause they stand on a wall... and say nothing's gonna hurt you tonight. Not on my watch."
The Cubans are going to hurt us?
cutting comment, thanks for making my day haha
I guess you’ve never heard of Bay Of Pigs, Cuban Missile Crisis, or Grenada?
You completely miss the point. It's not where they are, it's WHO they are. They are marines, and yeah, that's what marines do, they stand on that wall WHEREVER AND WHENEVER they are asked to, putting themselves in between us civilians and whoever might threaten us, many times at the hazard of their own lives. Jessup was clearly an asshole, and the villain in this, but his monologue about standing on that wall, and the code of honor, duty, and loyalty is spot on. There's a quote, I don't remember who said it, that is quite appropriate to this: "We sleep well tonight because somewhere rough men stand ready to do violence on our behalf." I know it's just a movie, but perhaps a bit more respect is warranted...
@@jeffhenry6822 Protecting us from [checks notes] Cuba?
She's saying that in general about the Marines not just those at Gitmo. These men are willing to die to protect YOUR freedoms. I believe a bit of respect is deserved.
I was expecting commander Nigel Tufnel to say something hilarious.
Great scene. 2 issues though.
1. The doctor has a clear conflict of interest. Just as Kaffee implies. Santiago was unfit, yet he gave him a clean bill of health.
2. Poison of some kind isnt conclusive evidence. So you cant say he was poisoned. All that the prosecution could say is that the actions of Downey and Dawson ended up in the man's death. Manslaughter. Not murder.
All the actors were great.
great movie
1:16 erm be quiet . You answered the question already .
What music do you use at the end of this clip?
"She made a mistake."
Yeah, that's pretty much her MO this whole movie.
I'm in love with Kevin Bacon.
The human body does not "burn" oxygen. Oxygen is used by the human body to "burn" (oxidize) nutrients (such as sugar) to release energy for use by the body, e.g., for walking around.
Thank you.
Aerobic respiration requires oxygen to release energy from respiratory substrates, such as glucose sugar. With an inadequate supply of oxygen, an anaerobic pathway can still release energy from the substrate but this much less efficient pathway will produce pyruvate which is then converted to lactate/lactic acid which can build up*. This is what the witness is trying to describe.
In both the aerobic, and the anaerobic pathway, energy is released from sugar. An "expert witness", even one trying to explain things in simple terms for the court, would not be as clumsy as this. Indeed, I cannot fathom an expert in the field talking about "burning oxygen" in this way. A moment of poor writing in an otherwise brilliantly written film.
*When/if oxygen becomes available later, the lactate can be converted back to pyruvate and the aerobic pathway can continue.
I agree totally. The error is akin to Han Solo's use of astronomy's "parsec" as a unit of time. "Parsec" is a unit of distance.@@Enjay001
Demi…more..man.
I always forget Nigel Tufnel was in this movie
Hahaha. She played such a great heel
Great movie! 😊
I didn't like Demi Moore in that movie.
She wasn't able to say that she was wrong. She didn't even take advice from others.
Doctor has the combat action ribbon but he doesn't have either Vietnam campaign or Vietnam service. Where was he in combat? What am I missing?
...Desert Storm...or did this story happen before then?
@@hernandv2000 He doesn't have the Destert Storm ribbon. The blue/white/red stripe in middle is marine corps security guard ribbon but he's not a marine. It appears to me they just put some ribbons together they though looked nice.
Jack Nicholson now that you guys are my cousins😂
I ran 400 m track and the principle of my training was oxygen debt. Lactic Acid replaced oxygen in my muscles after about 300m so the idea was to run through pain and get to the line
Medics to this day facepalm about thirst few seconds of this clip
Yes!
As I have said before regarding this film I doubt it inspired as many to enlist in the military as Top Gun no cool fighter planes or hot for teacher romance just some guy getting murdered at boot camp because he had asthma and a sociopathic superior officer.
Demi Moore was great in this.
More!!!
The doctor coined the idea of his amplifier dials going to 11.
The poison in marine barracks?
Where the heck it came from?
What did autopsy showed?
Simple questions
Burning sugar instead of oxygen is chemistry gibberish. There obviously wasn’t a medical consultant.
I think this scene touches a very delicate and sensitive ideology about some people like Lieutenant Weinberger who think Marines are bullies but at the same time Commander Galloway defend the Marines because they keep America safe! I never thought about it when I watched this movie when it first came out but after watching many times over, I realized this scene is very powerful!
Weinberger probably sucked at sports, so he probably was bullied for being slow when he was a kid, hence why he was more empathic, I know how he feels, I was bullied myself for running slow.
Galloway's reason for liking Dawson and Downey sounds just like Colonel Jessup's "you can't handle the truth" speech later.
Not only is she incompetent, she acts like she's fighting the power for the lowly grunts, while making Kaffee take all the risk. She gets IA glory with Jessup's skin if Kaffee wins, and gets away scott free if Jessup doesn't take the bait.
yes, stand on a wall IS what they do.
Why does a navy doctor have wings ? Noticed that last timei saw this movie
The last Movie Cuise ever made that was great.
Uh ... Top Gun: Maverick. Up until Maverick came out, I'd have said A few Good Men was his best movie. I can say, without any doubt in my mind, Maverick was a better movie.
I'm a navy seal again, that is a special and business agent as well as a journalist writer and lawyer among other weilwornse
Dr. Stone, in your expert professional opinion...........do you strenuously object?
This scene went to 11, with the tagger being left on it.
Beautiful American flag 🇺🇸
Fuck no.
This movie proves so well that women should learn to shut up listen to when a man is peaking, because they think with feelings and men think with reason and facts. )
Facts
Not sure a Lt jg would be yelling at a Lt Commander....
Kaffee should have asked if he had 6 fingers!
She's a million times better looking here than she was in The Substance. I'm sorry to state obvious biology but the thought can't leave my mind.
It’s a movie people, maybe one of the best in the last 40 years! Who cares if they “stretched” the medical jargon. It’s fiction not a medical dissertation!
The writing is better if the details stand up to scrutiny. The scene is better if everyone is wearing the correct uniforms, appropriate medals and decorations, if the correct flags are placed in the right places etc.
Caffey's cross examinations are scripted, but they're fantastic.
The whole movie is scripted as well
You just don't get scripts at this level anymore.
You do whenever Sorkin writes a new movie.
@@joemckim1183 He's fallen off since 2011's Moneyball IMHO.
@@joemckim1183 'The Trial of the Chicago Seven' wasn't at the level of this script.
The doctor's testimony went up to eleven.
Movies are really funny when it comes to courtroom scenes. Witnesses are asked questions, and they answer them. What you see in movies is BS. In this movie, the scene where Jessup is being questioned is completely ridiculous. He asks Kaffee almost as many questions as Kafee asks him!!
Great scene but not based in courtroom reality.
I loved the "Jo, go do.....whatever it is you do"................
We got postponed 96 hours from 10 weeks from now
You can also get that by taking somebody’s toothbrush and using it in the latrine
Maybe someone in the military can tell me, but don’t army officers serve in JAG also?
Galloway's little rant here is the one part of this movie I do not like.
Chest has child's face pinned under his chest
On what's taking so long on these and my wrist release...
4:43
When you overdose somebody with insulin, you can put them into a insulin induced coma that’s what that man is talking about
If you and Jack water into somebody’s IV, you actually give them myocarditis of the heart because you’re using tapwater instead of saline
Could u get that coronary infection from sex after the clean bill of health😊
Them hoes could be joses
Jose -ho zaes
It's a film FFS it's not real
recruiting pip pei range
This medical opinion goes to 11.
0:27
11 minutes?
Galloway was so f#$%ing irritating.
Pollack’s character said exactly why: there is a difference between paper law and trial law. Been awhile since I’ve watched the whole movie but IIRC this was Joan’s first trial. She was naive, inexperienced
She was irritating, nagging and stupid.
@@sean2015 True, true and true.
@@toddfrank3344 I've written this in my other posts. She was mocking and berating Kaffee for his reluctance to call Jessup to the stand. Well, she's not the one who faces a possible court martial for smearing a high-ranking officer. She gets to go home and go on with her life while Kaffee's life is ruined. She also made numerous bonehead mistakes throughout the discovery phase and during the trial itself, and was dismissive of her own errors while never hesitating to jump on Weinberg or Kaffee anytime she felt they were too timid.
@@sean2015 Exactly. I loved the scene where a drunken Kaffee lets her have what she's had coming for the whole movie..but I hated it when he subsequently apologized.
Both Sam and Joanne are right and wrong I think. Sam is right in that a soldier who physically may not have been up to snuff was tormented. He also fails to recognize an order is an order. Joanne is right in these soldiers have the guts to do what they do but the ends didnt justify the means. Its a sad situation all around and no one fully wins in the end.
Great acting. But I always though that "not on my watch" line was so utterly stupid.
Galloway is supposed to be stupid
Fun
They should have eviscerated his definition of lactic acidosis. That’s an absolutely terrible definition, wrong on so many levels
I'm one of the few who thinks Santiago was a dirt bag who snitched on his fellow marines.
Strenuously overrated movie 😁
Vagas winner
A 150 pound man on an 50 - 80 child. Soffication
Damn the US Marine Corp!
Thats the problem, to many words and no action. Drop the judge and send them to me and ill give you better judges.
Lord for camquat caught was he *ever tried families and all too they*
She singlehandedly totally ruins their entire defense strategy they had worked on and not so much as a simple apology, typical women for you
She had to try and show she has a set of nuts 🤪 she came up short 😂😂
😂😂😂
That happened twice that I know of too! When they are going to bring Jessup on the stand.. at the last moment, she said "dont do it if you think you cant". Wow, thanks a lot! Typical women lol
I’m reality your JD VANCE
There’s no room for the weak in the military private Santiago should’ve been discharged
Get ready now for Tom Cruise to make big wide eyes and his mouth agape.