Very well explained... But you should make an individual ordered playlist for logistic regression and other topics. Makes it easier to follow videos sequentially. Thank You
Nice video. I have a question about using logistic regression with low prevalence (23:25): does NPV decrease due to so many false negatives? On the contrary, we saw the opposite in the example of video about PPV and NPV: FN decrease and FP increase. Maybe we need to use a cutoff value lower than 0.5?
My mri report show on comparison previous mri study's reveal mild to moderate regression inthe thickness rectal neoplasms This is good or bad for my patients please answer Because tumour size increases
![[TF2] The Russian Bear Trap](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YFNSwz2_rOA/mqdefault.jpg)
Very well explained... But you should make an individual ordered playlist for logistic regression and other topics. Makes it easier to follow videos sequentially. Thank You
Thank you! I will try to do that but note that I have all videos in an appropriate order on my home page:
www.tilestats.com/
Nice video. I have a question about using logistic regression with low prevalence (23:25): does NPV decrease due to so many false negatives? On the contrary, we saw the opposite in the example of video about PPV and NPV: FN decrease and FP increase. Maybe we need to use a cutoff value lower than 0.5?
thank you very much for this video. The subject is very comprehensive and clearly explained.
Thank you!
sir can u teach the validation check please
??
My mri report show on comparison previous mri study's reveal mild to moderate regression inthe thickness rectal neoplasms
This is good or bad for my patients please answer Because tumour size increases
Cm cm cm