GAI-曼哈頓項目是針對那個領域? 龔小夏。袁弓夷

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2024

Комментарии •

  • @Yinyinlaw
    @Yinyinlaw 2 часа назад +12

    謝謝袁爸爸 小夏姐😎😍祝福兩位身體健康 平安喜樂🙏🙏

  • @Yinyinlaw
    @Yinyinlaw 2 часа назад +7

    支持袁爸爸 龔博士👍👍🙇🏻‍♀️🙇🏻‍♀️

  • @wikilee8928
    @wikilee8928 Час назад +11

    我不與人爲敵,我與自己爲敵,每天早晨起床第一件事是問自己是否可以比昨天的我更好,別人的成功不會令我矮小,他們有他們的旅途我有我的旅途,我知道自己從何處來往何處去,我已經不是八年前的我,我進步了很多 -- 川普。

  • @davidc5438
    @davidc5438 2 часа назад +7

    袁爸爸好! 龔博士好! 大家好! 早/午/晚上好!

  • @eggfryrice977
    @eggfryrice977 Час назад +2

    最鍾意睇小夏...very 真 and down to earth

  • @ABCABC-gq1gx
    @ABCABC-gq1gx 56 минут назад

    多謝兩位報導及分析辛苦曬❤

  • @Kokamhung66
    @Kokamhung66 Час назад +7

    ✨✨👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻✨✨

  • @kittykc38
    @kittykc38 2 часа назад +7

    👍👍👍👍

  • @JimmyYuen-n1r
    @JimmyYuen-n1r 2 часа назад +6

    如果係堅料會咁容易流出來嗎?開玩笑!

  • @ShleePing-r4u
    @ShleePing-r4u 54 минуты назад

    LIEBER HERR YOUNG PAPA BLEIBT GUT GUT ANKOMMEN ✍️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @tonychung3816
    @tonychung3816 2 часа назад +3

  • @Ursula-g7t
    @Ursula-g7t Час назад +2

    請問衣服的款式如何, 有些衣服需要鬆身才好看! 一定合身? 合身不一定好看, 旗袍也有許多不同款式的, AI 設計埋? 需知時裝設計千變萬化, AI 真的可以取代人手嗎? 不可能吧!!! 以前的自動化衣車, 只可以替代部份工序, 也不能全部取代, 而且只有特定款式如男裝恤衫等, 時裝款就取代不了!!!

  • @wikilee8928
    @wikilee8928 Час назад +4

    GAI and AGI are two different approaches toward AI. The future of AI is most likely the combination of both. The most common misconception about AI is what AI companies want you to believe, and that is AI is surpassing human intelligence. Well, it depends on how we define the words ‘surpassing’ and ‘intelligence’. Certainly, AI lacks certain human attributes such as motivation, intention, morality, love, hate, like, dislike, taste, etc. There will be always a gap between AI and human intelligence. China is not too far behind our AI technology, except that they don’t have enough advanced AI chips.

  • @FrankChiang-s3z
    @FrankChiang-s3z Час назад +2

    @sam 即係 Nancy南施。為Kong共政府服務,以打擊泛民為手段,以分化港人為目的。哈哈哈哈哈哈!

  • @peterhui7023
    @peterhui7023 Час назад +2

    第二次大戰後,21世紀,烏俄之戰仍以挖戰壕作戰,共小下說美國不懂如此打法,泒了很多軍事顧問去烏克俄觀摩,這是共小下完全唔識打仗的說法。
    事實上,美國識唔識二戰式打法都好,必定會泒軍事顧問去烏克俄,觀摩俄老屍的實力包括軟件及硬件,一看之下,俄佬是落後美國70年 !
    烏俄之戰,俄佬仍可以挖戰壕據守,是因為烏空軍太弱,至今仍未有足夠熟練機師及F16出戰,以美國實力,早以出動AI F16,F35,AC130J等戰機投射JDAM Bomb,每枚爆炸力高達2000磅炸藥,爆炸影響範圍由一至三個足球傷咁大,用AC130J 戰機居高臨下,猶如在伊拉克,阿富汗般用機槍及榴彈炮掃射地面坑內俄佬,地面戰車,不出两個月,俄佬要全面撤軍退回俄老屍境內。
    After the Second World War, in the 21st century, the war between Ukraine and Russia is still fighting around trenches. Sasha Kung said that the United States do not know how to fight with this kind of fighting and sent many military consultants to Ukraine to observe. This is because Sasha Kung do not know how to fight at all.
    In fact, whether United States masters World War II-style warfare or not, it will definitely send military advisers to Ukraine to observe the military strength of Russia, including software and hardware. At a glance, Russian militaries are 70 years lagging behind United States!
    In the war between Ukraine and Russia, the Russians can still deploy trenches to defend themselves because Ukrainian air force is too weak and still does not have enough skilled pilots and F16s to fight. If United States, it has already dispatched AI F16, F35, AC130J and other fighters to drop JDAM bombs, each bomb has an explosive power of up to 2,000 pounds of explosives, and the impact range of the explosion is from one to three football fields. The AC130J fighter planes are used like in Iraq and Afghanistan, using machine guns and howitzers to shoot Russian soliders in the trenches, tanks on ground surface. Under such condition within two month, Russian soliders will completely withdraw their troops and return to the territory of Russia.

  • @peterhui7023
    @peterhui7023 2 часа назад +5

    AI代替75%聯邦僱員,每年慳返二萬億美元,一利生,一斃出,失業人找什麼工作謀生?
    AI令人最恐懼的是令人失業,現在無人能提出滿意的解决方法,唯一是抽AI税來養人。

    • @Ursula-g7t
      @Ursula-g7t 20 минут назад

      所以未來人類精英化, 低技術刻板重覆精緻的由機械人做, 就如恤衫的領尖位置就是人手不及機器的快靚正質量有保証, 但係機器故障的話, 如果沒有人停機就會不斷的錯下去, 浪費物料!!! 設計應該好難用AI 取代的! 所以電影裡的未來都係一些刻板單一服裝, 不如時裝 SHOW 咁多姿多彩!!!

  • @freestfreer-np4kq
    @freestfreer-np4kq 16 минут назад +1

    「浸浸」終極勝利!2024 變天!
    TRUMP... Ultimate Winner, 2024 World-changer.
    HELP!!! Save HK! Free HK! CCP OUT!
    Whole World Vote for 【HK PARLIAMENT】
    撐 袁爸爸、懋叔【香港議會】!全球投票!
    【毋忘義士 · 永遠同行】
    「天 滅 虫 共 !香 港 重 光 !」
    【百國聯軍 • 虫國捱轟】

  • @manho4734
    @manho4734 8 минут назад

    🙏

  • @suking3549
    @suking3549 26 минут назад

    小夏姐 那裡可以買到液體線阿,貴嗎? 可否比條令來。多謝🙏

  • @cwso7030
    @cwso7030 48 минут назад

    可能那個AI計劃,十劃未有一撇,衹係概念階段,一個假設階段,小夏一向唔會評論一D風影消息的。
    我也同意小夏所言,美國人科學就叻,手藝真係弱項,除非聘用華裔,亞裔去做晶片。呢D民族性係好難改的。

  • @brightlightdun
    @brightlightdun 23 минуты назад

    Sasha is right that no country can crack down China, except herself, by their own people.

  • @Radio_FM_3123
    @Radio_FM_3123 37 минут назад

    誰會是這個曼克頓項目的 "奧本海墨 (Oppenheimer) " ?

  • @FrankChiang-s3z
    @FrankChiang-s3z Час назад +2

    @sam 任何大學收生紀錄都係機密,@sam 可以知道?唔係9UP係乜?哈哈哈哈哈哈!

  • @peterhui7023
    @peterhui7023 51 минуту назад +1

    Standards are defined by human beings not by AI. AI does not have human beings' preference, taste, beauty and morality. These and marketing are AI's weakness.
    標準是由人類而不是人工智慧定義的。 AI沒有人類的喜好、品味、美感和道德。這些和市場行銷都是人工智慧的弱點。

  • @Zhiqiu-i1b
    @Zhiqiu-i1b Час назад +1

    要知真正俄羅斯現象可看曉言。

  • @pingpingzang8670
    @pingpingzang8670 Час назад +2

    不久之後,DC同周邊房價將為落價,因為好多人被解僱

  • @barryyip9898
    @barryyip9898 12 минут назад

    美國係一個創意國家,日本係一個改良嘅國家,傳統美國嘅創意除了交比民間自行開發以外,還會交日本改良,因為亞裔嘅人做嘢比較幼細,美國國防除了有創意外還會有實踐實戰,重覆及反覆改良其創意,試舉例,上世紀70年代,從報章得知美國會發明有聲畫的電影,將會如當時70年代嘅黑膠唱片般能從留聲機播送,10年後80年初就讓日本推出卡拉OK,而美國民間亦開始推出了民用初級電腦,即時話美國創意無限,由民間發展,如馬克司回收火箭,又或該創意嘅細緻亦有可能交由盟友如日本,及台灣,例如納米晶片等

  • @user-ti1og3hj9f
    @user-ti1og3hj9f Час назад +2

    American First should be the first concern....Why worry about China change before TRUMP even officially become US president? May I ask ????

  • @PO-nb8qc
    @PO-nb8qc Час назад +1

    I am an engineer working in many different semiconductor Fabs.
    Very few want to work in Fabs even in Taiwan such as TSMC. The work hours are very long, the skills are too specific to transfer to other career or even to other Fabs but the compensation is relatively low compared to software, finance and many other career required similar education. It is better to be an electrician. They have a lot more freedom, make good money.
    I graduated from one of top 5 engineering universities in the US and have an advanced degree. In my industry, most have Phd/Master.
    IMO, the US could not compete with Asia in cost and talents.

  • @vincenttoh986
    @vincenttoh986 Час назад +2

    袁先生冇料,丢

  • @FrankChiang-s3z
    @FrankChiang-s3z 48 минут назад

    @sam 9UP 當秘笈,用大公、文匯料嚟呢度攪抹黑、分化?哈哈哈哈哈哈!

  • @FrankChiang-s3z
    @FrankChiang-s3z 22 минуты назад

    @sam 你喺呢度造謡、抹黑、攪分化、扣帽子,我見wok打wok,知冇?哈哈哈哈哈哈!

  • @lem2023L
    @lem2023L 2 часа назад +1

    US actually is not as powerful as you think of. China is raising fast in AI

    • @PO-nb8qc
      @PO-nb8qc 46 минут назад

      Software maybe, hardware no way!