Eldar Djangirov - Torque (Piano Solo Transcription)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 авг 2024
- If you wish to donate and help this channel grow: www.paypal.com...
Song: Torque
Artist: GEM
This solo was an enigma I just had to solve.
Original video: • Meinl Cymbals - GEM - ...
See guys? 4/4 can be cool too.
For as far as you can call this 4/4 hahaha
@@MeDoMeer it is 4/4 tho
Amazing that you did this! Love that you chose this song. I really wish this song was on an album
Thanks! Me too, I was so excited to wait for them to release a record and tour :(
At first I was like okay, cool. Then came 7plets, I was like oh nice. From the middle to the end I was like what the fuck. If this is improvised I have no words. Great transcription.
Thanks! And yes, this solo is improvised! Be sure to check out his own trio. I haven't seen anyone play like him, he should be way more famous than he is.
bro nested the nested tuplets
Amazing.
Insane
Respect!
What even are these rythyms, triple-nested quints or what I can’t even to begin to understand
man this is awesome! I've been trying to learn this song since last week (not the solo).....btw, do you have the transcription for the full song? thanks!
Thanks! I'm sorry, I only transcribed the solo :(
🔥🔥🔥
holy shit how long did this take you?
I think I got most of it down in 10 hours, but getting the chords and harmonic analysis right probably took another 10!
@@boudewijnlamper great stuff
Is that Henrik Linder on bass?
Yes it is
Dude what
i would like to buy this transcription.
Sure thing! You can email me at boudewijndrums@gmail.com. Just tell me what country you're located and we can set up a price.
I'm so confused. Why the 5:3 in 5 at measure 10 instead of 16th note quintuplets? Other than that, a very impressive transcription!
Because that wouldn't be accurate. Eldar is playing 5-note groupings within the time span of 3 16th note quintuplets. Another (in retrospect, perhaps easier) way to transcribe this is by using dotted 32nd note quintuplets. These last exactly as long and then you wouldn't have to use nested tuplets.
@@boudewijnlamperWhat? I got even more confused with your explanation.
@@bazingacurta2567 What part of my answer is unclear to you? I'll try my best to explain it.
@@boudewijnlamperI understand it now. It's just a fiendishly complex rhythm. Now I'm wondering how the hell you managed to figure this out.
@@boudewijnlamper This is great work, man! What software do you use to transcribe, if I may ask?