tbh, this thing shoulda been a squad vehicle, the wz1001 could be foldered with ztz99a and eventually m1a2t will be after cm11. it would be odd if there are chinese tanks in a taiwan line
Disagree about changing the BR. It has worse armor protection than the 96A/A (P) but makes up for it in mobility, which is rare for the Chinese TT. It is fine at it's current BR, if this tank needs a BR increase due to mobility, then I hate to break it to you...NATO tanks are gonna need a BR increase as well.
@@siko9799 it has a massive lower front plate that's incredibly weak, only half of the composite armor there actually can stop something, the other half due to the angle its at just gets penetrated. It has a massive breach made out of a sponge. The roof is slanted and is easily penetrated causing your breach to go out and can kill a crew member. the driver port is massive kill me in 1 shot spot. It is basically an Abrams but worse in some respects but a better shell. Stays at 10.0 or Leo 2A4's can go to 11.0.
@@silent_j6198 the frontal armor is arguably better than the 96a because of better coverage. the lfp is pretty much immune to m774 besides the very bottom, and the ufp is 500mm which is more than enough for the br.
I modified the sight used in the video. I posted original sight link in video description But that one removed So I need to check permission to post this sight
@@XabasGasino The MBT-2000 has thicker frontal armor, but is more mobile, and has a faster turret rotation speed than the T-80BV, and has a lower repair price. Where is the balance?
I like the turbo sound
Sounds like a lawn mower
Hmmm Is it turbo sound?
One of my favorites of the update. That reverse gear has me acting up🥵
Yes It's not 4~7km/h !
tbh, this thing shoulda been a squad vehicle, the wz1001 could be foldered with ztz99a and eventually m1a2t will be after cm11. it would be odd if there are chinese tanks in a taiwan line
Ohhh 🤔
@@abdixz609yeah that'd work, im just kinda pissed that i have to grind another line for a backup for the ztz99a
Disagree about changing the BR. It has worse armor protection than the 96A/A (P) but makes up for it in mobility, which is rare for the Chinese TT. It is fine at it's current BR, if this tank needs a BR increase due to mobility, then I hate to break it to you...NATO tanks are gonna need a BR increase as well.
it’s literally a t-80b with its main weakness removed, it should be 10.3.
@@siko9799 it has a massive lower front plate that's incredibly weak, only half of the composite armor there actually can stop something, the other half due to the angle its at just gets penetrated. It has a massive breach made out of a sponge. The roof is slanted and is easily penetrated causing your breach to go out and can kill a crew member. the driver port is massive kill me in 1 shot spot. It is basically an Abrams but worse in some respects but a better shell. Stays at 10.0 or Leo 2A4's can go to 11.0.
or its a 2s25m with a better reverse rate and actual armor at the same br@@silent_j6198
@@silent_j6198 the frontal armor is arguably better than the 96a because of better coverage. the lfp is pretty much immune to m774 besides the very bottom, and the ufp is 500mm which is more than enough for the br.
00:50 차창 시점이 더 높은건가요? 차창시점으로 곡사샷한건가요? 원리가 어떻게되는건지
곡사라기보다는 워 썬더 눈 지형의 특징상 관통이 한 걸 응용한거랑 3인칭에서 사격원 위치 확인하고 전차장으로 편하게 조준도 한거죠
썬더 눈 맵들은 지면 위에 눈들이 오브젝트 판정이 안나서 쏘면 그냥 뚫려요.
역시 '차이나'의 기술력이란
우리의 상상을 초월하네;;
China ~!
One of the best tanks to come from this patch!
Ohh you like it this vehicle?
@@MochiAPFSDS absolutely, it reminds me of the WZ1001!
Engine sound needs to change. It sound like it's stuck on 1st gear all the time
It little bit weird and loud
It can be 10.3 but I also think it should add 125-ll as the upgraded shell
If you mean DTC one
then should go up 10.7
@@MochiAPFSDSIf DTC added i agree 10.7 even 11
I want the crosshair you're using. Can you tell me where I can download it? I can't find a crosshair like yours.
I modified the sight used in the video.
I posted original sight link in video description
But that one removed
So I need to check permission to post this sight
그래서 이게 왜 10.0?
ㄹㅇㅋㅋ
MBT-2000 must be 10.3BR.
Yes
No, if DTC and GP added ,yes
@@XabasGasino MBT-2000 is almost better than T-80BV, and T-80BV has 3BM-42 as the best APFSDS which is very worse than 125-I APFSDS.
@@XabasGasino The MBT-2000 has thicker frontal armor, but is more mobile, and has a faster turret rotation speed than the T-80BV, and has a lower repair price. Where is the balance?
@@XabasGasino ZTZ96 has 125-I APFSDS (1993) at 9.3, when T-72A at 9.3BR has 3BM-22 APFSDS (1976). Where is the ballance?
👋👋👋
Hello
Hello Mochi, could you pass me the sight pls? Nice video !!!!!
Thank you 🥰