Ryzen 7 8700G vs GTX 1650 - Gaming Benchmarks | Test in 12 Games |
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июл 2024
- Ryzen 7 8700G IGPU vs GTX 1650 DGPU - Gaming Benchmarks | Test in 12 Games |
System Specs:
Ryzen 7 8700G - amzn.to/43eMNsB
GTX 1650 - amzn.to/3uTG2zw
ASUS ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming - amzn.to/3FBYZIJ
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB
32GB DDR5 6200MHz - amzn.to/43kWEwm
38-38-38-84
CPU Cooler
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 amzn.to/3ASP8wE
2 TB Corsair Force MP600 amzn.to/3o0gqtf
Timestamps:
0:00 Assassin's Creed Unity
1:09 Forza Horizon 5
2:30 Red Dead Redemption 2
3:40 Cyberpunk 2077
4:23 GTA 5
5:14 Far Cry 6
5:56 Call of Duty Modern Warfare III - Warzone
6:48 Shadow Of Tomb Raider
7:29 Rainbow 6 Siege
#8700G #radeon780m #780m 
Игры
![Sean Rii, Karyon, Sharzkii - Taungule [My Love] (Official Music Video)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eJoMuypbSzQ/mqdefault.jpg)
System Specs:
Ryzen 7 8700G - amzn.to/43eMNsB
GTX 1650 - amzn.to/3uTG2zw
ASUS ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming - amzn.to/3FBYZIJ
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB
32GB DDR5 6200MHz - amzn.to/43kWEwm
38-38-38-84
CPU Cooler
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 amzn.to/3ASP8wE
2 TB Corsair Force MP600 amzn.to/3o0gqtf
Timestamps:
0:00 Assassin's Creed Unity
1:09 Forza Horizon 5
2:30 Red Dead Redemption 2
3:40 Cyberpunk 2077
4:23 GTA 5
5:14 Far Cry 6
5:56 Call of Duty Modern Warfare III - Warzone
6:48 Shadow Of Tomb Raider
7:29 Rainbow 6 Siege
The era of needing a gpu for gaming at a budget might be over
Nope.. 8700g is toooooo expensive to be a budget
if you were on budget you will take discrete GPU over APU any day. you can get something like 3600 combine with RX6600 at cheaper price than 8700G.
@@arenzricodexd4409 well we need to wait and see, maybe they will bring out cheaper ones, also hence I said might be, not that it definitely is
@@arenzricodexd4409 true but having the 8700G nets u an allready updated platform making it possible to upgrade later on, saving you money, and additionally u can increase the VRAM on the APU to your wishes unlike a discrete GPU
3600 is trash. It has missing cores and threads
Tbh the CPU it's a good start for people who want build a pc
good CPU no doubt but it is not a budget CPU.
8600g is gold option for budget @@arenzricodexd4409
@@arenzricodexd4409 8600g is good for budget PC builds
@@arenzricodexd4409 If you calculate a "non-GPU" CPU (with the same CPU speed and power consumption as a 8700G) with a budget GPU, then it´s cheaper.
Of course if you plan to buy an additional GPU card - then this does not make sense, because you buy the GPU in the 8700G without using it.
-> Therefore the 8700G makes sense in a computer which is not used for 100% gaming. Or when you want to build a small PC which is capable of some gaming.
The 8700G is not a game changer. It is not for high end gaming in 4K with all details. If you need this - don´t buy it, it´s the wrong CPU for you.
If you only want an office PC - don´t buy this CPU - a small cheap mini-PC is the way you should go.
In my old computer ther´s a 1650 super. The comparison in this video shows me - the 8700G can do roughly the same FPS. Thx for this video!!!
@@arenzricodexd4409but u don’t got to worry about the GPU
cant wait for the 10700G ;D
the price is the problem, you can buy a cpu + gpu at the same price of the 8700 but have really better performance (like rx 6600 and a cheap processor).
exactly amd is transforming into an intel nvidia mix, but prices are too crazy, it is great to see a cpu with an igpu performing this well, but I buy performance, that is the only thing that matters, so eventually the price will go down, but not for now, literally in my area I can get an i3 12100F + rtx 3050, or an amd option, and the performance will be way better.
@@lordgizmo1763 best option sure, for gaming and for any other activity (video edit or production, or programing, the difference between a dedicated gpu and an apu its really big), maybe i select a rx 6600 more brute power than 3050
@@lordgizmo1763the problem is this is laptop processor made for high performance CPU tasks, to be paired with dedicated GPUs.
They should design a new product all-together to market as a true budget APU in the 250 USD or lower range.
These are make for laptops but AMD sell for desk to so is nice im searh the performance for my new laptop
The budget combo gpu + cpu wouldn't as performant cpu wise as the apu amd is offering. This would be the adequate apu build for those seeking powerful cpu with decent igpu on the side for casual gaming. I think this is the only way amd can advertise the 8000g cpu generation.
I am currently using the E3-1231 with 32gb of ERAM and a 1050-TI. I mostly play World of tanks with graphics on max at 1080P. I would love to build a PC using the 8700G it would be a little faster graphics than I am currently using but what i like the most is I will be running my PC at about 1/3 the power so my electric bill will go down I will also be able to run Windows 11 if I so choose. and room wont be so hot. Win Win!
nice to see the ac unity in the benchmarks!
It's almost a 10 years old game and it's still being a parameter for testing hardware, impressive.
CPU OC?
Newer games much optimized to newer architecture like 780M.
I want to build a pc, I am weighing my options, and here is my hardlines:
For sure my system will be AM5-based.
Budget is 1200$.
So I think if I put this 8700G as a starter, with fast ram like this guy has, then I can afford a discrete gpu like the Rx7700 or even 4700 ti super after 3 months or so after the initial build.
So my guess is this CPU is like the 7600x?
Memory bandwidth is the issue.
Please explain what is that, and is that problem on amd 7 8700g
@@sasser6055 yes
@@sasser6055 Espero que o tradutor do RUclips faça um bom trabalho, mas vamos lá
Largura de banda é a quantidade de dados que uma memória pode transferir por segundo. Quanto mais dados ela transfere, maior é a largura de banda.
Esse é um dos grandes gargalos do 8700G pois as GPUs integradas usam a memória RAM como VRAM, e a memória RAM é muito lenta comparado a VRAM de uma GPU comum, então a taxa de transferência de dados de uma GPU integrada é muito inferior.
Uma coisa que poderia ajudar muito seria a adição e popularização do Quad-Channel, mas acho que infelizmente a AMD não vai trazer isso tão cedo, até porquê os preços já estão bem restritivos sem o Quad-Channel...
This is good for 1080p gaming, and lower power consumption.
I would like to see this iGPU in something like a 8500G CPU. A cheap CPU with a better GPU. Just offer us what we actually look for, like real value.
You can get the same CPU power and much better Gaming power for literally the same price range. I don't see the point of this APU.
Agree, this graphical power while its great to see, it would be much better fitting in a lower price CPU, still great to see
25w - 40w not bad
wut?? when i play in Forza PC takes over 130W...XD with same core ftw!
compare the value of this igpu that's 4 yrs after the 1650 already cheap gpu was release. The 1650 after 4 years has value dropped. Meanwhile this cpu launching with expensive price but already outdated value igpu. So it's usefulness is going to be much shorter lived which is why its value should compare to the current value of the gtx1650. It should have stacked cache X3D to justify it's price. or lower price to match the already reduced value of the already aged gtx 1650
i will buy ryzen 9000 series
Yeah, this is the best case scenario for the 8700g. Fast and expensive ram with a fast CPU. In a more realistic scenario the 1650 will be faster. Its not cost effective as well. As we've seen even the rx680m didn't come to cheaper laptops. Neither has the rx780m.
And is it really that impressive beating a 1650 now that its a 5 year old budget card? The more realistic target would be the rtx 3050 6gb at minimum if not the rtx 3050 8gb.
Haha, wait till you see next mining boom :) People will be begging for apus lol