Our platoon (Swedish infantry in Halmstad) had a Volvo BV 202 during our military service back in 1979. It was a very useful vehicle to have. It had no limitations at all.
@@Karl-Benny Uhhmm.. Did i say that? I simply stated that the Hägglunds BV 206 (or really it is the BV202) is the role model for most modern tracked articuleted vehicles.
@@dietmarholtz188 Apart from being not articulated. Although hydraulics were not available then and the RSO was really a war product. The Germans faced a problem and they needed a quick solution. Actually they copied the idea it from a Russian tractor.
BV 202 developed in early 1960 rest is all copys even THE famus Hägglunds 206/2062 😉 the last version used MB diesel engine but the most were build on the Ford colonge 2.8 L V6 engine Good in Swedish -30C cool Winter Times.👍
OK, I guess that I'm not understanding something. With all of those tracked "cars"/trailers, are they powered or not? When they say articulated, I am thinking of one whole unit.
DT-30's and Bv206 pretty much came into life at the same time. Bv206 and DT-30 differ quite a bit in design but both utilize the same principle of the Bv202. I'd say they are both derivatives of the Bv202 design. And I'm not talking about the design as in "looks" but rather the design as the over all composition of two separately tracked units with a linkage between them.
I saw two BV206s for sale recently; one was £30,000 GBP and the other was £48,000 GBP - both with flat bed trailers. The more expensive of the two was heavily refurbished.
The Bronco also known as Warthog used by the UK Royal Scots Dragoon Guards in Afghanistan against talibans, was combat proven to survived IEDs without crew fatality....
They used the Viking first but it wasn’t survivable enough against IEDs… too many fatalities I believe. They needed a replacement quick. bronco being a similar ATTC which was more survivable and readily available. Hence was then chosen to replace the Viking. Seemed to have worked well with them as casualties drastically reduced
I tried watching the video but the pictures flashed through so quickly and where so distorted buy some sort of filter that I couldn't even see them fail fail fail
I agree. The production team, for this video, must have consumed exhaust fumes. Only good aspect is to do ones own follow up at home Web sites for each product. Keep trying chaps.
There are so many 2 unit, articulated, tracked vehicles, about the only differences are size and horsepower. They are great for climbing and descending steep grades and boggy, swampy terrain. That said, they are kind of large for wooded areas, that you wouldn't want to damage. Also they are not very maneuverable in close quarters or those same wooded areas. A smaller tracked vehicle, maybe about the size of the middle sized one of these shown, with just the front, powered unit, would probably be more practical for hunters, farmers and other outdoorsmen. Two to 3 foot wide tracks and maybe a little lighter than most of these shown, would be good, in my opinion.
Indeed, Bombardier made their first Snow Coach back in 1952, they were conceptually inspired by military half tracks from WWII, but made with civilian use in mind. Bombardier were also involved with early types of Snowmobiles that looks more like the ones we have today, during the 1960's. So yeah, they were involved, even if they were not the very first, they certainly helped the early development. 😀
@@Grumpy_old_Boot ok i saw pictures of a long bodied machine on two sets of tracks, like an oilfield bed truck, way up in the tundra, bogging along in six feet of peat moss you couldn't walk on.
@@alancadieux2984 Ah Yeah, that could have been a Bombardier Muskeg carrier, or possibly a PRINOTH tracked vehicle. PRINOTH made a lot of industrial machines. Nordwell is also a contender. In fact, there has been quite a few companies that have made tracked vehicles, that have disappeared over the years, or bought up by others. Alternatively, an old soviet Vityaz DT-30, those are incredibly capable machines, and a very few even made it to America/Canada!
@@Grumpy_old_Boot nope. It was bombardier, i worked with an old man, who is still alive, but many years ago, he was hired by bombardier as the test pilot, if anyone wanted a demo, he was the driver. Showed me pictures. We worked oilfield together.
While it is true that *the Swedes were indeed first,* the Soviet didn't just copy the design, they improved upon it. Esentially, the *Soviet* were better at making them *bigger and better,* and thus much more useful for heavy industry, like the oil industry. The Vityaz DT-30 means it was a 30 tonne model, that's a whole lot bigger than the little Bandvagn 202! On a sidenote, "Vityaz" means "Knight" or "Paladin", and it was meant to be a vigilant defender of the eastern marshlands of Russia.
Your video fails to explain that both units of the many articulated vehicles have all their tracks powered by the engine in the forward unit through the articulated coupling. Such a system provides more than just extra traction, but aids in steering and climbing through extremely rough terrain, wetlands and snow/ice. Single unit track vehicles get stuck in situations which articulated vehicles can "wriggle" out of.
But you only show part flashes of what these machines are doing. There it goes in the water..and that's it. Did it sink or float who knows. Irritating. Like dry humping.
No one mentioning the eye hurting amount of awful cuts...? Please chill out and stop repeating yourself so much on what's similar... tell us the differences...
This video is about all terrain tracked carriers (ATTC) and tanks r a different class of armoured vehicles known as main battle tanks (MBT), so that's why there r no tanks featured in this video.
Old 80s BV 206 driver here (3 tours). It was a lot of fun back then in Norway. ... I like the look of the Beowulf.
I've driven the Volvo BV 202 in Norway on exercises with AMF(L) it was the BV 206 predecessor. Great fun and ould go anywhere.
Drove the BV206 when on manouvers in Norway with Canadian Military, awesome piece of kit.
It all started in Sweden 1964 with Volvo BM Bv202. Then came Hägglunds Bv206. Also from Sweden. I mean where else from? Then the rest.
BERU 58 Bombadier muskeg tractor. 1949. Also Nodwell’s from 1950’s. From Canada...of course.
You are right, and The BV206 also came with a wide spectrum of variants, both military and civilian.
@@peterwright4647 sure but they arent articulated
@@einar8019 Around 50 variants have been produced.
Actually before that. Prototyping in 1958. First drive tests in 1959 and series production runs in 1964
Our platoon (Swedish infantry in Halmstad) had a Volvo BV 202 during our military service back in 1979. It was a very useful vehicle to have. It had no limitations at all.
I love All the tracked vehicles from Sweden.
Most modern articulated tracked vehicles are copys of the Hägglunds BV206.
sure but that does not make them any less capable tell me what tank is not copied from another or jet fighter
@@Karl-Benny Uhhmm.. Did i say that? I simply stated that the Hägglunds BV 206 (or really it is the BV202) is the role model for most modern tracked articuleted vehicles.
I think the German Steyr RSO of WW2 was a similar idea
@@dietmarholtz188 Apart from being not articulated. Although hydraulics were not available then and the RSO was really a war product. The Germans faced a problem and they needed a quick solution. Actually they copied the idea it from a Russian tractor.
Steyr has been at that time of the 2nd WW an AUSTRIAN Company, NOT a german one! But of course they delivered to the foreign force. Rover
Love all of them. They are formidable off road vehicals
Must have vehicles for search and rescue during blizzards
BV 206 Are the best ! Drove them for years
Does the 3344 have rock /gravel crossing capabilities? Is there a civilian version? Top speed?
All this with no mention about the rear DRIVEN trailers
Iirc DT-30 is the only one originally built and capable of crossing over the whole of Antarctica. It's a beast.
They're so sick, but they get about 0.78 mpg, or about 100 km per 300 liters. Ouch! Still, that thing will go almost anywhere.
Does anyone know if the rear part of these trailered units are powered or just along for the ride
the rear units are powered, the engine in the front unit usually powers both.
@@blockstacker5614 thank you for the insight sir. Awesome machines
Is the 3344 street legal and can it be split up? How much does it weigh?
BV-206. Most proven. Has tons of different versions from different countries depending on what you intend to do with them.
I drive those in the finnish army and theu are a lot of fun and really capable. I haven't yet been able to get one stuck!
@@outandabout259 US Army uses them in Alaska, excellent vehicles.
The best equipment OUR money can buy...
I want one of each. Or an rv version of the Beowulf and the Ripsaw to play in.
they used ripsaw in the new Mad Max movie. i've read that everyone on the movie set hated it cause it was always breaking down
really interesting - but please, please drop the stomalk-churning transitions?
Is there a driveshaft powering the trailer tracks?
On most yes.
Awesome video
They should make these more available for civilians! 🖒
DT30 can go through the most in this list. But the BV206 is the most practical.
4 or 6 of those is actually the exact same vehicle just a different cab on them for different country and uses
Bv S10
The DT-30 VITYAZ, I think it`s the best!
and that's the large version, there's also the DT-10 an -20
Excellent choice
Wish it would show the inside of some of these
Vityaz dt-30(Russia) its the most capable terrain truck in the world by far...nothing beat that beast.
What happened to to the Volvo snow cat? many of the vehicle's shown here are based on this .
BV 202 developed in early 1960 rest is all copys even THE famus Hägglunds 206/2062 😉 the last version used MB diesel engine but the most were build on the Ford colonge 2.8 L V6 engine Good in Swedish -30C cool Winter Times.👍
"BV 202" is also called "Volvo snow cat" same thing.
www.hkfw.at/en/our-vehicles/70-volvo-bandvagn-bv202-mk-1-2-snowcat-en
OK, I guess that I'm not understanding something. With all of those tracked "cars"/trailers, are they powered or not? When they say articulated, I am thinking of one whole unit.
Guy H. Yes all vehicles in this video that articulate have power ran to “trailer” some using a drive shaft and some using hydrostatics.
holy youtuber transitions batman editing makes me feel like i'm drunk
I grew up lusting over Unimogs, until I saw the Vityaz DT-30, WOW !
PS: Half the machines here are just smaller copies of the DT-30.
DT-30's and Bv206 pretty much came into life at the same time. Bv206 and DT-30 differ quite a bit in design but both utilize the same principle of the Bv202. I'd say they are both derivatives of the Bv202 design. And I'm not talking about the design as in "looks" but rather the design as the over all composition of two separately tracked units with a linkage between them.
@@AlexKall вообще-то у вятязя своя конструкция, свое цацки эти не ставь в сравнения
It would be nice to know if the price tags for the civilian versions of these vehicles
I saw two BV206s for sale recently; one was £30,000 GBP and the other was £48,000 GBP - both with flat bed trailers. The more expensive of the two was heavily refurbished.
The Bronco also known as Warthog used by the UK Royal Scots Dragoon Guards in Afghanistan against talibans, was combat proven to survived IEDs without crew fatality....
UK used the Bronco as well as the Bv-S 10 Viking?
They used the Viking first but it wasn’t survivable enough against IEDs… too many fatalities I believe. They needed a replacement quick. bronco being a similar ATTC which was more survivable and readily available. Hence was then chosen to replace the Viking. Seemed to have worked well with them as casualties drastically reduced
Awesome 👍
just the thing for that Friday night shopping at Tescos .
I tried watching the video but the pictures flashed through so quickly and where so distorted buy some sort of filter that I couldn't even see them fail fail fail
I agree. The production team, for this video, must have consumed exhaust fumes.
Only good aspect is to do ones own follow up at home Web sites for each product.
Keep trying chaps.
So many unnecessary visual effects.
Every fucking picture was bending or twisting.
Check out the friggn wheelie the Ripsaw was doing at 2:00 and the jump it did at 1:56 . That looks like extreme fun. How much??? lol
half a million bucks
DT-30 for me, thank you ;D
Ill take two :P
Would love a Ripsaw to drive around in
@@incredible_facts то
I want one of each truck. 💪💪
Semoga pt pindad bisa mengembangkan kndaraan sprti ini bravo .
It would be great to see them go up against each other in competition, im sure they are all capable but there can be one winner.
That RIPSAW EV3 is really something. so fancy
Would love to know the prices of these.
Hagglunds BV 206. In snow it is harder to beat than you probably would think. Weak point is its driver. I used to be one.
I would like more info on all these tracker vehicles
montana would be a nice to have one.
There are so many 2 unit, articulated, tracked vehicles, about the only differences are size and horsepower. They are great for climbing and descending steep grades and boggy, swampy terrain. That said, they are kind of large for wooded areas, that you wouldn't want to damage. Also they are not very maneuverable in close quarters or those same wooded areas. A smaller tracked vehicle, maybe about the size of the middle sized one of these shown, with just the front, powered unit, would probably be more practical for hunters, farmers and other outdoorsmen. Two to 3 foot wide tracks and maybe a little lighter than most of these shown, would be good, in my opinion.
An unbiased team should take the best parts from each and create the ultimate one .
yes and make a realy muddy and hard track they are made to go to see who do it the best
Great video. I wonder how much each of these vehicles costs.
All of it...
@@mrfixitusa6165 What does your sheriff think about your business practices?
@@beachside1 what in the wild world of fruit loops are you talking about?
Didnt bombardier build some simaler but
Larger 40 or 50 years ago?
Indeed, Bombardier made their first Snow Coach back in 1952, they were conceptually inspired by military half tracks from WWII, but made with civilian use in mind.
Bombardier were also involved with early types of Snowmobiles that looks more like the ones we have today, during the 1960's.
So yeah, they were involved, even if they were not the very first, they certainly helped the early development. 😀
@@Grumpy_old_Boot ok i saw pictures of a long bodied machine on two sets of tracks, like an oilfield bed truck, way up in the tundra, bogging along in six feet of peat moss you couldn't walk on.
@@alancadieux2984
Ah Yeah, that could have been a Bombardier Muskeg carrier, or possibly a PRINOTH tracked vehicle. PRINOTH made a lot of industrial machines. Nordwell is also a contender.
In fact, there has been quite a few companies that have made tracked vehicles, that have disappeared over the years, or bought up by others.
Alternatively, an old soviet Vityaz DT-30, those are incredibly capable machines, and a very few even made it to America/Canada!
@@Grumpy_old_Boot nope. It was bombardier, i worked with an old man, who is still alive, but many years ago, he was hired by bombardier as the test pilot, if anyone wanted a demo, he was the driver. Showed me pictures. We worked oilfield together.
@@alancadieux2984
Cool beans, can you perhaps remember the model name of it ?
I'm curious about it now. 😁
What are those prices, Beowulf?
What about the Marooka?
" Off-road capability is the key to success ", so that's what was missing in my answers in the Financial Reporting Quiz....
And just where is the Chariot from Lost In Space?
I think I like the voyager the best, it just looks right, practical and if it’s uncomplicated as stated then that’s another plus.
Like all
I will buy 1 😄
BV-206 & Voyager I would be happy with either. Talk about an awesome hunting rig to get out into the mountainous back country.
Oh I would love to own a tracked vehicle.
ничего нет, что можно было бы противопоставить Витязю
Российские вездеходы самые лучшие особенно дт 30 ВИТЯЗЬ!!!
wow
Hebat juga indonesia.
Is the Ripsaw street legal?
To hell with a "quad." I want one of these things. Talk about hunting in comfort (relative comfort anyway).
Bandvagn and Sisu NASU all day.
Wow
@@incredible_facts More videos upload 😄😄.
Where can I buy a Dt 30 lol
Russia
The whole time I watch the video, I have the feeling that my display is dirty
If you're using it to move the space shuttle, you really only have one option, smartie-pants!
The fisheye effect used in the video was starting to make me nauseous lol!
Wao I hope they're affordable.
What about the Nodwell, the Foremost Husky, or the Marcep Intruder?
Russia- hey let's build a quad track vehicle
Every other country on earth- hey that's cool let's make our own version!
Nah the russians actually copied the swedish bv202, which started production 1964 and the classic bv206 which has been in service since 1980.
While it is true that *the Swedes were indeed first,* the Soviet didn't just copy the design, they improved upon it.
Esentially, the *Soviet* were better at making them *bigger and better,* and thus much more useful for heavy industry, like the oil industry.
The Vityaz DT-30 means it was a 30 tonne model, that's a whole lot bigger than the little Bandvagn 202!
On a sidenote, "Vityaz" means "Knight" or "Paladin", and it was meant to be a vigilant defender of the eastern marshlands of Russia.
I think the predecessor to all of these might be the US M29 Wiesel built in 1942
@@blockstacker5614 that would be a fun vehicle to own and even possibly affordable, always rather fancied one.
@@CrusaderSports250 Hope you live somewhere cold, I've read that they overheat constantly.
Extreme V (Civilian) and the Branko Bronco (Military) is the same vehicle.
Your video fails to explain that both units of the many articulated vehicles have all their tracks powered by the engine in the forward unit through the articulated coupling. Such a system provides more than just extra traction, but aids in steering and climbing through extremely rough terrain, wetlands and snow/ice. Single unit track vehicles get stuck in situations which articulated vehicles can "wriggle" out of.
The BVS 10 looks good, I wonder how much?
Can I have one of each and I’ll advertise your unit every day I’ll take the machine to work eveyday lol
You need a pop filter for your microphone.
GAZ-3344
RIPSAW EV3
TTM-4902
Vityaz DT-30 PM
BV 206
Voyager
EXTREMV
STV TL5
Bronco
Beowulf
Tucker snocat?
В России вместо дорог строят внедорожники. Так дешевле
But you only show part flashes of what these machines are doing. There it goes in the water..and that's it. Did it sink or float who knows. Irritating. Like dry humping.
как будто их проектировал один и тот же инженер)
BVs10!
Hola no entiendo el inglés pero bueno
We've some Fast and Furious spoiler in this video :D
Tracks can go where wheels can't
The last one alsum
best vehicles on tracks are bulldozers or tracked loaders and tractors
No one mentioning the eye hurting amount of awful cuts...? Please chill out and stop repeating yourself so much on what's similar... tell us the differences...
No tanks in this list?
This video is about all terrain tracked carriers (ATTC) and tanks r a different class of armoured vehicles known as main battle tanks (MBT), so that's why there r no tanks featured in this video.
Also, tanks are too heavy and use too much fuel to make it into the top ten.
this is all a later copy of BV 202
@@suprlite right
Interesting all-terrain vehicles (snow-swamp transporter)
ruclips.net/video/gU7rik2fnrw/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/gU7rik2fnrw/видео.html
giant 20-meter all-terrain vehicle weighing 100 tons, chthonic monster SVG-701 Yamal
ruclips.net/video/w__T4C4uDkM/видео.html
too many ads for me to watch
Just get me a good old cheap MTLB.
There all the same layout it must be the best way 😅
I'd prefer the Vityaz DT series by far. The Ripsaw is an expensive toy for those who do not now to spend their money on next...
The ripsaw ev is a toy, the military version of course not, but non of them is a big transport
Dude, the wobbly jelly video effect on the photos is annoying as hell. Unnecessary and just causes motion sickness. Great video otherwise.