It is exactly this issue of personal freedom that has completely shaped post-Hegel political debate and to which neither socialism nor liberalism has the right answer. The "answer" is that it is a constant battle of giving and taking. The source of that answer lies in the concept of personalism.
This pious wish of Hegel’s to interpret the orthodoxy of his generation was successful, and the modest hopes of his philosophy were fulfilled. Never perhaps was a system so true to its date and so false to its subject. ~Santayana, Egotism in German Philosophy (1916).
Electric, what Singer is trying to distinguish is the orthodox Christian view that God created the universe and humans as distinct from Himself (but is still actively guiding human affairs--God's Providence, which is unlike deism) while Hegel believed that God is not transcendent but rather is immanent within the universe and in humans to the point that God animates the world and us. Hegel comes close to being a pantheist as Singer points out, but he is not quite there since Hegel believed that God was not reducible to the universe or to humanity. Hegel was closer to being a panentheist rather than a pantheist. Hegel saw himself, however, as a Christian even if he departed significantly from orthodoxy.
Whoever edited this video must have been drinking too heavily, which reminds me of John Kenneth Galbraith commenting that being drunk was the only way to begin to understand Hegel's prose. Perhaps, someone took up Galbraith's recommendation.
![MAF Teeski - Whole Thing (feat. VonOff1700) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SHWEj-ndz6g/mqdefault.jpg)
These discussions are such a treasure. Thank you for sharing them😇
Imagine turning the TV on and this is running.
That’s what it used to be like when I was a kid. I feel I remember so many programs like this especially On PBS, But not exclusively
These videos are badass
It is exactly this issue of personal freedom that has completely shaped post-Hegel political debate and to which neither socialism nor liberalism has the right answer. The "answer" is that it is a constant battle of giving and taking. The source of that answer lies in the concept of personalism.
The video repeats minute 21:00 at minute 31:52 again
The description of Hegel's writing sounds exactly like Foucault.
👏🏽 Awesome!
the film repeats in the middle?
Thanks for this. Really interesting.
Back in the 1970s it seems Singer was trying to look like Nietzsche. He didn't quite have the hair for it...
No that's just the style a lot of people were going for in the 70s; large mustaches.
Why's it repeating did they cut it
what the fuck was that opening music?
It was like something out of kubrick's The Shining
Peter Singer knows a place you can go when you’re short on your dough.
Where?
@@tonyholmes962 ask the people in the village
This pious wish of Hegel’s to interpret
the orthodoxy of his generation was
successful, and the modest hopes of
his philosophy were fulfilled. Never perhaps
was a system so true to its date and
so false to its subject. ~Santayana, Egotism in German Philosophy (1916).
Ooh that book title sounds interesting, exactly the thought i was having
Singer's presentation of the Christian position was actually the Deist position. He obviously knows his stuff but that was wrong.
Electric, what Singer is trying to distinguish is the orthodox Christian view that God created the universe and humans as distinct from Himself (but is still actively guiding human affairs--God's Providence, which is unlike deism) while Hegel believed that God is not transcendent but rather is immanent within the universe and in humans to the point that God animates the world and us. Hegel comes close to being a pantheist as Singer points out, but he is not quite there since Hegel believed that God was not reducible to the universe or to humanity. Hegel was closer to being a panentheist rather than a pantheist. Hegel saw himself, however, as a Christian even if he departed significantly from orthodoxy.
Whoever edited this video must have been drinking too heavily, which reminds me of John Kenneth Galbraith commenting that being drunk was the only way to begin to understand Hegel's prose. Perhaps, someone took up Galbraith's recommendation.
in what sense is the personal the political? Magee doesn't seem to hold that view...