3:45 That is not really something that there is no room on opinion on, or something related to the same subject matter 7:43 that depends on the development of these discipline 8:40 why would that necessarily be a seonc d barrel, as opposed to being included in 'delivering the goods'
An oxymoron is not just any paradox, or apparent contradiction; it’s intentional paradox for literary or rhetorical effect. In any case, the measure of a rationalist is not the validity of his reasoning; it’s the relative weight he gives to pure reasoning or deduction over empirical induction.
The audio on this is definitely better than the other version I found on YT, thanks for the post 👍👍
Descrates is my all time fav. Personality from the past
Excellent. I finally have some understanding of the ontological argument. Interestingly, my phone thinks (!) that "ontological" must be a misspelling.
This isn't the best place to find out about it though
And how does yur toaster prefer to spell “teleological”?
Indubitable. Of course
3:45 That is not really something that there is no room on opinion on, or something related to the same subject matter
7:43 that depends on the development of these discipline
8:40 why would that necessarily be a seonc d barrel, as opposed to being included in 'delivering the goods'
Rather than expecting us to rewind to these specific minutes and seconds, why don’t you just tell us what the hell you’re talking about?
Descartes believing in God without proving the premises and claiming to be a rationalist seems to me an oxymoron.
An oxymoron is not just any paradox, or apparent contradiction; it’s intentional paradox for literary or rhetorical effect. In any case, the measure of a rationalist is not the validity of his reasoning; it’s the relative weight he gives to pure reasoning or deduction over empirical induction.