Combat Shirt Comparison: Crye, FFI, 5.11, TruSpec

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024

Комментарии • 20

  • @thealliedpowers
    @thealliedpowers 6 лет назад +6

    I'd be much more motivated to buy from other brands if they sold their shirts in something other than fucking Multicam and solid colors.

    • @TyrantKingsMilsim
      @TyrantKingsMilsim  6 лет назад

      The Allied Powers It really is a huge pain to find any other patterns of combat shirts. Is there anything specific you're looking for? There's also the option of getting shirts custom modified. - TK Dave

    • @thealliedpowers
      @thealliedpowers 6 лет назад +2

      I like A-TACS a lot. Also, I'm not hating on multicam, I tested it where I am and it's really effective. But it's not the only pattern that exists.

    • @TyrantKingsMilsim
      @TyrantKingsMilsim  6 лет назад

      I agree, it can be useful to not use what everyone is using. We try and use less common camos on occasion to help with differentiating our guys from other players in the same faction.

    • @subaschen8595
      @subaschen8595 6 лет назад +1

      The Allied Powers I totally feel you. Crye's lack of other camos, along with the sad reality that I can't exactly afford their gear lol, holds me back from purchasing anything. I too like A-Tacs very much, I'd definitely appreciate it if Crye decided to implement the pattern.

  • @RMCMXCV
    @RMCMXCV 3 года назад +2

    You should do an Tactical Performance Corp A-TACS iX Combat Shirt (TCS-R) review, please!

  • @typorad
    @typorad 10 месяцев назад

    I know this video is like 7 years old, but, do you know if the tru spec or ffi sleeves are water resistant? I bought 5.11 recently and the Teflon treatment makes water glide off the sleeves. I would really like to get something in m81 woodland with the water resistance.

  • @andrewmillburg3167
    @andrewmillburg3167 7 лет назад +3

    How does the FFI compare to 5.11 to you in terms of durability?

    • @TyrantKingsMilsim
      @TyrantKingsMilsim  7 лет назад +2

      Snarky Knowitall I've owned at least 5 5.11 combat shirts over the past 6+ years and all of them are still useable. That being said some of them are definitely worse for wear. The torso material is pretty susceptible to tearing and getting holes, especially if you are wearing the shirt stand alone and not under armor. We haven't had nearly as long to test the FFI shirt, but I would say that I think the 5.11s will hold up better than the FFI. - TK Dave

  • @ethansnyder6587
    @ethansnyder6587 7 лет назад +2

    What do you think of the Condor combat shirt

    • @TyrantKingsMilsim
      @TyrantKingsMilsim  7 лет назад +3

      Ethan Snyder We haven't had hands on with them yet, but I'd be a little wary of a $30 combat shirt. - TK Dave

    • @TyrantKingsMilsim
      @TyrantKingsMilsim  7 лет назад +2

      Update for you, just got one in to review, so be on the lookout for a video soon - TK Dave

  • @lalew2
    @lalew2 7 лет назад +1

    that woodland shirt is showing sweat marks?

    • @TyrantKingsMilsim
      @TyrantKingsMilsim  7 лет назад

      lalew2 if you're referring to the FFI shirt, it was actually washed incorrectly (they aren't supposed to get dried) so it has burn marks from the dryer.

  • @Jewifer333x2
    @Jewifer333x2 7 лет назад +1

    how would you compare the quality of the crye shirt to the 5.11?

    • @TyrantKingsMilsim
      @TyrantKingsMilsim  7 лет назад +3

      Jewifer333x2 the crye is overall higher quality. Although the 5.11 is pretty solid, the Crye has better quality control as well as fitting. If you wanted something a bit cheaper though, the 5.11 is still very solid; Crye is simply the best.

    • @Jewifer333x2
      @Jewifer333x2 7 лет назад +2

      Tyrant Kings Milsim makes sense to me. I love my 5.11s.

    • @treerat7631
      @treerat7631 5 лет назад +1

      You can get a surplus massie crye for around 20.00 bucks

  • @sjbaker85
    @sjbaker85 5 лет назад

    Wow, what a waste of time. “It’s like a medium white shirt...” You don’t say.