The words came into mind, when the sun comes up she lets her hair down and I remembered it was in a hair commercial so I looked on RUclips and found this! I remember it on TV when I was about 10 or 11 years old.
In Grade School during this time, we kids use to instead say, "Does She, or Doesn't She? She Does, Doesn't She?" Seeing this commercial brought back that memory, out of my "Museum Mind". How did I ever get this old? 🤔
Too bad that is not the first one. She had dark hair and very fine features. Her photo was also on the Clairol box. I would love too see that one again. I was in TV at a local station and ran that commercial when it was on film. I wish I kept it now.
there's one with a brunette and several kids upon a hill - with the same song except it's vocal performances was like Gene Pitney's - if not actually him
THERE IS A MISS CLAIROL COMMERCIAL MADE AROUND 1959 SHOWING A LOVELY BLONDE WITH HER DAUGHTER IN A OLD TIME BEAUTY PARLOR GETTING HER HAIR COLORED WISH YOU COULD SHOW IT.
What stands out so conspicuously about this television commercial is that it shows that it is from a time era when families stayed together. You didn't have a 50 percent divorce rate back then like you do now. When you watch the commercial, you'll notice how the woman coddles her two little sons in a motherly and nurturing fashion and that her husband projects himself as a strong man who protects his wife and kids.
Well, I'm not that old. At least not by Japanese standards. And 1949 was long before my time. Don't let the pre-mature gray hair fool you. I was a toddler when this advertisement came out, and you may even be from the same generation as me (Generation X). Unless, of course, you're a millennial. Anyhow, I'm not saying that the late 1960s and the early 1970s didn't have their fair share of problems, and I would agree with you that the American criminal justice system has come a long way since then. However, if you were to travel back to that time era in a time machine and come back here a year later, you would immediately realize that we live in much more violent times now than we did back then. There are even more violent demonstrations now in major cities throughout our country than there were back then. That's assuming that you're an American like me. I'm not a conservative Republican under any given standard. However, whenever I compare the late 1960s and early 1970s to the present, I can see what people mean whenever they say that the institutions of marriage and family are currently falling apart. Unlike then, homelessness is now everywhere. At least back in 1969, we Americans had launched a rocket to the moon, and we did so again in 1973. Now the people in our space aviation program have to use Russian rockets to get to and from our space stations that are in orbit. That's so not good.
Also, I realize that I saw the world back in the late 1960s and the early 1970s through the eyes of a little kid, but I wasn't completely oblivious to what was going on around me then; and I'm well aware of what is going on around me now.
stupid people generalize - like taking a fabricated commercial and generalizing to the rest of the country - tv commercials tended to avoid the dysfunctional situations going on around them - so wiser people don't assume they signify anything but the imaginations of the marketing people and the wistful daydreams of the ordinary people
@@johneyon5257 Oh, I'm not saying that TV advertisers and other types of TV producers didn't sugarcoat things on the picture tube now and then back in those days. There were people in that industry looking to make money as there are now. Back then many people saw sitting down and watching television as an escape from the pressures of life, even though there were fewer of those back then. It was kind of like the lyrics of that song "Paper Mache" by Dionne Warwrick. It was when "All In The Family" first premiered on television that television audiences started to crave more controversial and realist topics from that point on. Americans experienced their first televised war (Vietnam) back in the 1960s and the early 1970s, but the streets of major cities throughout the U.S. felt safer back then than they do now. As a little kid, I remember my grandmother taking me over to Manhattan and not seeing any vagrants or junkies there in the Big Apple, unlike now. The most bizarre commercial I ever remember seeing back then was one where a middle-aged woman got arrested for shoplifting and her little daughter was with her.
@@consumerwarrior1267 - there are mothers cuddling children in commercials today - or haven't you noticed - and there are still manly men in commercials - or haven't you noticed - if you haven't - you've allowed your biases to blind you my point was to confront your claim in your original post that the mother cuddling children was a sign of the times - if it was - then mothers comforting children these days is a sign of these times if you want to say things were better then - than just say it - rather than try to contort a single commercial into something like evidence - it doesn't work and if you want to say things were better then - how about for black people - remember - that society that was wonderful for you and John Wayne - wasn't for everybody - sorry to knock cracks into your visions of the past - no - i'm not sorry at all
That presumes that women wouldn't make the choice to dye their hair unless it was because of a commercial. Please. Women have colored their hair for decades, they just didn't talk about it openly. Hence the reason for the slogan does she or doesn't she? If Miss Clairol hadn't existed women would have found other ways to color their hair. The laws are simple economic should tell you that there wouldn't have been a supply if there wasn't already a demand. People need to stop shaming women for the choices they make whether it's coloring your hair or letting it go Gray. It's no one's business but their own
The words came into mind, when the sun comes up she lets her hair down and I remembered it was in a hair commercial so I looked on RUclips and found this! I remember it on TV when I was about 10 or 11 years old.
In Grade School during this time, we kids use to instead say, "Does She, or Doesn't She? She Does, Doesn't She?" Seeing this commercial brought back that memory, out of my "Museum Mind". How did I ever get this old? 🤔
The body MUST age. But if we are wise, the HEART and MIND will remain young...
These days, "Does she or doesn't she?" means something totally different.
Thank God they released this song as a single.
This is from the television season of 1969-70.
Reminds me of my mother 💕💕💕
Commercials like these just make you think fondly of all the loved ones you had who are now gone.
Too bad that is not the first one. She had dark hair and very fine features. Her photo was also on the Clairol box. I would love too see that one again. I was in TV at a local station and ran that commercial when it was on film. I wish I kept it now.
One of the handful of songs that made the translation into a pop hit.
The arrangement sounds like Nilsson's "Everybody's Talkin" from MIDNIGHT COWBOY (written by Fred Neil)
Yes it does. I knew it sounded familiar but couldn't put my finger on it.
"She wakes up the sleeping flowers early in the morning"
-Just the opposite of what Pepe LePew did.
does she or doesn't she ? only her hairdresser knows for sure
there's one with a brunette and several kids upon a hill - with the same song except it's vocal performances was like Gene Pitney's - if not actually him
This version definitely existed, because my uncle was the singer in question! He performed under the name "Don Young".
@@erics3454 - unlikely - i know what Don Young sounds like - - as i said - the singer in the commercial had a more Gene Pitney singing style
James Marsden hasn't aged a day since then.
THERE IS A MISS CLAIROL COMMERCIAL MADE AROUND 1959 SHOWING A LOVELY BLONDE WITH HER DAUGHTER IN A OLD TIME BEAUTY PARLOR GETTING HER HAIR COLORED WISH YOU COULD SHOW IT.
I have it on my vintage hair color playlist I think it's from Traciodees channel
Didn't David Clayton Thomas of Blood, Sweat and Tears sing one of these jingles for Clairol?
He’s with her until her sister comes of age. 😂
What stands out so conspicuously about this television commercial is that it shows that it is from a time era when families stayed together. You didn't have a 50 percent divorce rate back then like you do now. When you watch the commercial, you'll notice how the woman coddles her two little sons in a motherly and nurturing fashion and that her husband projects himself as a strong man who protects his wife and kids.
Well, I'm not that old. At least not by Japanese standards. And 1949 was long before my time. Don't let the pre-mature gray hair fool you. I was a toddler when this advertisement came out, and you may even be from the same generation as me (Generation X). Unless, of course, you're a millennial. Anyhow, I'm not saying that the late 1960s and the early 1970s didn't have their fair share of problems, and I would agree with you that the American criminal justice system has come a long way since then. However, if you were to travel back to that time era in a time machine and come back here a year later, you would immediately realize that we live in much more violent times now than we did back then. There are even more violent demonstrations now in major cities throughout our country than there were back then. That's assuming that you're an American like me. I'm not a conservative Republican under any given standard. However, whenever I compare the late 1960s and early 1970s to the present, I can see what people mean whenever they say that the institutions of marriage and family are currently falling apart. Unlike then, homelessness is now everywhere. At least back in 1969, we Americans had launched a rocket to the moon, and we did so again in 1973. Now the people in our space aviation program have to use Russian rockets to get to and from our space stations that are in orbit. That's so not good.
Also, I realize that I saw the world back in the late 1960s and the early 1970s through the eyes of a little kid, but I wasn't completely oblivious to what was going on around me then; and I'm well aware of what is going on around me now.
stupid people generalize - like taking a fabricated commercial and generalizing to the rest of the country - tv commercials tended to avoid the dysfunctional situations going on around them - so wiser people don't assume they signify anything but the imaginations of the marketing people and the wistful daydreams of the ordinary people
@@johneyon5257 Oh, I'm not saying that TV advertisers and other types of TV producers didn't sugarcoat things on the picture tube now and then back in those days. There were people in that industry looking to make money as there are now. Back then many people saw sitting down and watching television as an escape from the pressures of life, even though there were fewer of those back then. It was kind of like the lyrics of that song "Paper Mache" by Dionne Warwrick. It was when "All In The Family" first premiered on television that television audiences started to crave more controversial and realist topics from that point on. Americans experienced their first televised war (Vietnam) back in the 1960s and the early 1970s, but the streets of major cities throughout the U.S. felt safer back then than they do now. As a little kid, I remember my grandmother taking me over to Manhattan and not seeing any vagrants or junkies there in the Big Apple, unlike now. The most bizarre commercial I ever remember seeing back then was one where a middle-aged woman got arrested for shoplifting and her little daughter was with her.
@@consumerwarrior1267 - there are mothers cuddling children in commercials today - or haven't you noticed - and there are still manly men in commercials - or haven't you noticed - if you haven't - you've allowed your biases to blind you
my point was to confront your claim in your original post that the mother cuddling children was a sign of the times - if it was - then mothers comforting children these days is a sign of these times
if you want to say things were better then - than just say it - rather than try to contort a single commercial into something like evidence - it doesn't work
and if you want to say things were better then - how about for black people - remember - that society that was wonderful for you and John Wayne - wasn't for everybody - sorry to knock cracks into your visions of the past - no - i'm not sorry at all
Yeah nature can't do it alone they need plenty of help from Madison Avenue money makers scheming up products
That presumes that women wouldn't make the choice to dye their hair unless it was because of a commercial. Please. Women have colored their hair for decades, they just didn't talk about it openly. Hence the reason for the slogan does she or doesn't she? If Miss Clairol hadn't existed women would have found other ways to color their hair. The laws are simple economic should tell you that there wouldn't have been a supply if there wasn't already a demand. People need to stop shaming women for the choices they make whether it's coloring your hair or letting it go Gray. It's no one's business but their own