For a few years now I’ve been entertaining the thought that Donald Trump is the President of the United States, and yet I cannot bring myself to accept it.
@@JohnnyArtPavlou my 401 K definitely accepts it!!!! African Americans accept it with African American employment at its highest Ever! The Hispanics accept it with unemployment at its lowest in their community ever! Europe and China are now realizing they cannot continue with unfair trade against the USA...yep all good! AND we landed on the Moon! So did China
@Wes Porter you called me a brain washed stooge because I made a joke. So yes, I did insult your intelligence in turn. And you insult the intelligence of every single person who works or has worked on the space program every time you let that abortion of a conspiracy theory escape your mouth like so much diarrhea. Tl;Dr: go fuck yourself.
There is a type of people who respond to "I don't know" with, "you therefore dont know anything, and I know for sure." More people do need to be honest with themselves and be skeptical about their own beliefs. When Socrates said "all I know is that I know nothing" publicly that was a kind of brave act.
That's my take on religion. Heaven, hell, God, and satan...I don't know. A person can believe all they want but in reality. Religion, all of them are he said, she said stories pasted down from generation to generation. Interpreted by different people in their own words! I don't know or understand the "word of god" because it's man who is preaching it😒
Not really dude there's nothing wrong with having a guess offcourse we don't know that's obvious i say i don't know all the time religion don't know when my misses asks me who left the toilet seat up don't know😉✌
I completely agree. I don’t fully understand everything. I’ve got a very good grasp of most things. The conclusion I’ve drawn is that we’ve went to the moon, but I don’t think it happened when they said it did. I also think they fake a ton of the space station videos. I’ve seen the cables etc. it’s obvious. But I have no idea why they would...
2:50 He's partially correct. The image on the right IS doctored, but not by NASA. It was doctored for Michael Collin's Autobiography because he was upset that they NASA never took footage of his actual spacewalk. So he included a doctored image of his "spacewalk" in the book.
Well , I think there's a difference between stealing a quote and trying to pass it off as an original and embellishing a quote to make it more salient to your own point. In this case , the Japanese proverb is asture and minimal,, Franklin inflates the situation with customary Yankee bombast. I don't buy that Armstrong quote though.
@@coiledsteel8344 oh wait that rings a bell, wait no, could it have been Brian of Jerusalem? He was the Messiah and I should know, I've followed a few.
Buzz Aldrin would be a perfect guest for Joe Rogan. He has no filter whatsoever and would tell Joe everything he needs to know about project Apollo so that he never gets mixed up again.
Wes Porter we never went back be cause we lack the will to do it. BTW, lunar reconnaissance orbiter photographed the Apollo landing sites back in 2009.
PEOPLE PHOTOSHOP SOME PICTURES?/ AND YOU BELIEVE THEM?? PEOPLE FUCK YOU ALL!! TAKE A SCOPE AND AIM IT AT THE MOON? YOU WILL SEE THE LANDING SITES DUE TO NO AIR ON THE MOON?? WHAT NEXT JOE BELIEVE BECAUSE OF PHOTOSHOP THE WORLD FLAT?? ALL THEY PROVED IS YOU DIDNT LISTEN IN SCHOOL. WHY NOT TALK TO SOMEONE WHO BEEN THERE, ASS WIPE.
People are afraid to say “I don’t know” because they think it makes them look stupid for not knowing, but pretending to know when you don’t makes you look 100 times more stupid... What’s wrong with not knowing?
Yeah I think we can all agree with that sentiment but at the same time we have to realise we are limited cognitively and we're naturally programmed to think like that. We can't be too hard on ourselves.
What I learned in public school was being wrong was a reason to be ridiculed. So many of my classmates were quick to laugh at anyone who answered a question wrong, or look at them in utter disbelief as if to say "are you mentally retarded?" The issue is the response to being wrong. If being wrong is met with ridicule then people will either A) stop participating or B) go out of their way to be right
Control is the most basic and necessary human illusion, and the least realistic. People will always feel a need to know, or at the very least FEEL as though they know. This gives us a sense of control over ourselves and the subject of our thinking, and with that comfort. That need will never really go awah
Lol, it's pretty rare he does that. I mean, if he acted _too_ normal how would he get batshit crazy conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, Terrence Howard, and Kat Williams to come on his show?
He is just trying to make himself look good the way he is doing this. All he had to say was he wasn't smart enough to know and made shit up because he believed other stupid people. Its called using you're platform to spread misinformation instead of staying out of topics you know nothing about so you don't spread you're own stupidity.
@@jasonuhrinek8393 Maybe you're right. But if somebody changed their opinion they don't have to say all that imo. Just pointing out how they were wrong should be enough I think..
@@hiranom20 He continues doing it though. His show at this point is mostly just rhetoric and misinformation. You can pretend it's harmless or recognize it for the societal cancer it is. When people like him give shills a platform they're effectively promoting that shill's agenda whether that's their intention or not. I mean, for Christ's sake, he's friends with Alex Jones; i.e. the man who claims school shootings are "false flag events" despite blatant and obvious evidence to the contrary. Eventually he'll have someone on that says something stupid enough, and or, say something stupid enough himself to get himself cancelled. He's too much of a thick moron not to, and he buys into his own hype at this point. At the end of the day he makes his living asking celebrities questions and describing adults beating the shit out of each other.
This was cool. He thought it was faked. Looked at it objectively. And realized he was wrong, and changed his beliefs to match the facts. Subscription earned!
He clearly still thinks it was faked as this whole video is him talking about the evidence towards it, then saying he's not a rocket scientist so he's not aloud to form an opinion.
"Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently" - Wernher Von Braun:
It’s extremely difficult for me to have any respect for anyone who seriously thought that the moon landing was faked. It’s scary that people that foolish have the right to vote.
@@tonyduncan9852 Sir you can't be serious, the irony on your comment is over the top. That video of the AK carrying monkey is a publicity video for the Rise of the Apes movie, you can read it on the description and you can see the 20th Century Fox water mark on the bottom left of it. Indeed very scary ;)
@@tonyduncan9852 Fair enough sir, Thanks for the laugh though, that was a funny video to watch. In this case we can observe though how good we became at faking stuff and that if we want to believe it, we will. So we might as well throw the Moon landing deniers a bone or two, cheers!
@@MetalGuitarEdi "throw the Moon landing deniers a bone or two" - not a single thing. The video taken from the buggies of the Moonlanders (and also of the astronauts climbing into them) taking off is a visual proof. That torn pieces of gold-plated melinex film were torn off by the rocket exhaust and flew away in straight lines without slowing down or dropping, tells anyone with a working ability to see that those are the consequences of both a vacuum and low gravity. These shots were taken at least a decade before any type of digital colour video synthesis existed.
I was entertained & amused by the idiocy & TBH if I was offended & irritated by the content I'd still give it a Thumbs-Up as Joe Rogan & his channel is by and large Quality St.
I wish everybody would try to approach conspiracy theories in this way. Evaluating what facts we know and the likelihood of different outcomes. I respect Joe for evolving his view and being willing to talk about it
I don't know enough about "the science" (rocket or otherwise) either. I DO know HUMAN NATURE and part of that "science" is knowing that individuals and people lie, and obfuscate, and otherwise BAMBOOZLE people for ALL SORTS OF REASONS, (not excluding the reason[s] of just sheer amusement, and the "reason" regarding the proverbial dog and his balls.....And why he licks them). I also know that people who may not INTENTIONALLY be lying often spout off MISINFORMATION---again for a variety of reasons, the main one being that some authority figure told them repeatedly that "y+y" equals "x", OR.... Since EVERYBODY ELSE claims that "y+y"= "x" and it's supposedly "common knowledge", only an "idiot" would claim otherwise, so why even QUESTION it? Never mind CHALLENGE it?? Also...."y+y" MAY INDEED equal "x", but those who know HOW and WHY that is true, often cannot or WILL NOT explain the answers to "lesser minds" to those two questions of "HOW" and "WHY". (Never mind the answers to that OTHER 3 letter question, and the remaining 4--letter questions.) The assassination of JFK may NOT have been a "conspiracy", despite SO MANY claims otherwise. HOWEVER......."Lone gunman" or not, the SCIENCE of FORENSICS indicate that Lee Harvey Oswald was NOT the only shooter. (Or to put it more succinctly, THE SCIENCE of FORENSICS indicates NONE of Lee Harvey Oswald's bullets were responsible for entering JFK's cranium.) WHY do I bring this up? Just merely to POINT OUT that even though "FACTS MATTER", the IMPLICATION and/or RAMIFICATIONS of facts might MATTER MORE!! I also bring it up because REGARDLESS if the MOON LANDINGS were faked, IT IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE for a COVER-UP to occur from a large group of people--in the JFK case, the Warren Commission, and the rest of the United States Government. Take something more tragic and recent: September 11th, 2001. REGARDLESS of whether one believes there was a conspiracy behind that day, or one accepts the "official narrative", there are A LOT of UNASKED and UNANSWERED questions about that day, and the time period PRIOR leading up to it. (And such questions have NOTHING to do with the supposedly "smoking gun" of Building No. 7.) Bottom line? Mockery of Moon Landing Conspiracy theorists MAY NOT be appropriate. But since the MOON LANDINGS did NOT involve the loss of innocent lives, I personally do NOT lose a lot of sleep over the event one way or another. If you have read this comment in its entirety, thank you for your attention.
when you become targeted and blacklisted by the government you start to see things in a different light. i know first hand i got a gift from my grandfather who was in charge of security for a division of nasa and that gift just keeps giving and giving and giving. Guess who stoped making fun of his paranoid uncle.
i had a boss, that hated when people told her "i dont know" and she always went on a rant about it, i told her i can lie and make something up if you prefer. that job sucked, that was 1.5 years ago and they still havent found a replacement for me
I couldn’t have said it better. The government lies more than they tell the truth and unfortunately most people in society now are conditioned to except everything they’re being told instead of doing any critical thinking. Our government doesn’t want critical thinkers, they want obedient workers.
How would it be any other way though? You can’t be an expert at everything so you have to trust other peoples word at some point. I think that’s just a fact of humanity not something engineered by “them”
When _Mythbusters_ dealt with this, Jamie went to New Mexico and talked to a little readhead radio astronomer, who happens to be the wife of a friend of mine. She demonstrated to Jaime how ANYONE with the fairly available equipment can aim a radio or laser at any of the landing zones and get bounce back confirmation.
True....but a LOT of people are under the assumption that people can view items on the moon landing site with an Earth bound telescope which is not true at all. BUT they CAN....with the right equipment.....do what you just stated above which is just as amazing. The USA AND other countries HAVE seen items left on the moon but only by doing fly by's when they were launching a space probe. This has been done not only by the USA but by other countries so IF there was really nothing there.....that would have been exposed long ago. It is pretty weird to people how we can see sooooooo far away into other galaxies with our Earth bound telescopes yet cannot see objects from the moon landing on the moon. Still, they cannot wrap their heads around HOW small those objects are on the moon and how truly far the moom actually is from Earth......and how massive and bright those other galaxies really are we see in outer space. It is soooooo crazy and distances soooo massive it is really hard for humans to reallly, truly comprehend. The known observable Universe is amazing and to think of how unimaginably massive the areas are that we will NEVER, EVER see due to the limitations of the speed of light. It is mind numbing.
@Lady Mercy I'm sorry but that is absolutely preposterous. Simple math proves that the Delta V required to fly an entire studio to the moon wasn't available in the Saturn V rocket, let alone the fact that going to the moon to then fake a moon landing is pointless.
no its much easier to pretend you went to the moon especially if you have been trying to go to the moon for the last decade and have all the simulations and equipment
Yes cause the hundreds of thousands of people who all worked on it all lied about the same thing their wholes lives and were in on it to a tee. Get with it man. Use your brain.
@@LemanoftheRussVI no why does everybody have to know about it being fake, for example everybody at the VW plant doesn't know that they are adding a device in the car to cheat emissions testing, only a few people know
@yostaustin well, if it was a hoax, those hundreds of thousands of people who worked on it may not even be aware of it being a hoax. Its possible that the majority of people involved with the programs 100% believed their work was actually being contributed towards the goal. If it was a hoax id suspect only a handful of folks would know the trurh. My personal opinion is this... theres many inconsistencies that dont add up. The biggest one that stands out the most to me is that we havent went back (or possible never even been there) some claim this is because the motivation is gone, the original motivation being the space race. But the fact is that the moon is loaded with precious resources that are rare on earth. If we could go there in the 1960s, why hasnt any operations been begun to begin mining/collecting these resources? Additionally its said that nasa intentionally destroyed their research and data involving the apollo programs. As such its now perpetuated that scientists simply cant figure out how they did it back then. Issues such as their instrument panels woulx be damaged by the radiation belt etc prevents modern expeditions to the moon. It just doesnt make a lot of sense. But, it is a romantic notion that we went to the moon.
@@kardia5672 but everyone knows the soviets landed on the dark side.......and never returned Its fairly well know their last chaotic transmission included screaming about a giant purple robot with a single eye and an arm cannon Clearly they were annihilated by Shockwave Obviously And don't get me started about that I'll fated soviet misadventure to Venus............. All those soviet cosmonauts being tried in the Quintesson's propaganda show trial overseen by the Imperial Magistrates and unfortunately being found innocent 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈
@@owennickell8358 as an Aerospace engineer, you have insulted me. If you can follow the math, I can show you the orbital mechanics which show we can do it.
@@natemoorman4562 im not disputing your orbital mechanics, im saying the moon landing video looks like really bad theater. Considering how much better television is today contrary to what is was back then, and our experience of its capability. It makes sense that the wool may have just been pulled over ours and our grandparents eyes.
I was very close friends with a fellow for many years who was an aeronautical engineer who was closely involved in the engineering/planning of the 1969 moon landing mission. (And other prior and post NASA projects. The 1969l was not a hoax. In fact, in recognition of his work on the mission he was gifted a chunk of moon rock which he displayed in his office for the rest of his life. He was a 35+ year member of the U.S. Airforce and was involved in many clandestine operations over the course of his career. He would not have lied to me on this issue.
“Appreciate it. I appreciate you, appreciating it”
3 года назад+441
Most people mix facts with their own opinions, and start believing their opinions are facts. Understanding the difference between a fact and your conclusion about the fact, is when you truly start to mature and read life with wisdom.
@@GibboFrank it all depends on the lighting conditions. The Hasselblad cameras used on the moon had to be set up before launch to a specific aperture by guessing how bright the surface of the moon would be. As is evidenced by the literally thousands of pictures taken on the moon (including full 360 degree panoramas) they hit it pretty good. The reason you can’t see stars in the moon pics is because the exposure setting wouldn’t allow for it. If the film had been exposed to show stars, everything else in the shot would have been blown out.
@@GibboFrank are you saying the astronauts couldn’t see stars? My bad. I thought you meant in the pictures. That’s true, too. They were on the moon in full daylight with no atmospheric interference. The human eye works like a camera lens.
Very simple proof of the moon landing; when the astronauts landed on the moon they set up a retro-reflector. Its a big mirror that will reflect light right back towards it's source with minimal scattering. To this day astronomers are able to shine a laser towards the retro-reflector and the light from the laser will travel to the moon, hit the mirror and then return to the source of the laser. This is how physicists know how far the moon is from earth at any given time, its used for figuring out tidal forces for meteorology as well.
You're not an engineer. You don't work in aerospace. You know how I can tell? Because you're too dim to work in these fields. Funny how the hoaxers always work on the bottom rungs of society.
@@Evan-rl1rnThe biggest problem with the worst conspiracy theorists is that their conspiracies will extend as far as they needs to to confirm their beliefs. Retro-reflector? It's a lie. It's not there. Any data from the reflector is faked. Documents confirming the cargo load that took it to the moon are faked. Anyone who claims to work with the reflector is lying. No evidence is enough because any and all evidence is either faked or a lie. Anyone presenting evidence that is contrary to their beliefs is a liar or a government shill or a sheep. And on and on and on.
I'm not an engineer nor a doctor. Automatically discredited. Lmao. The logic is strong with these ones. Didng magic atheist Joe switch his stance on 911 for his sponsors also. Guess it's working to appease the main stream low IQ tools.
To explain why they walked differently from one mission to another is because during the missions, they realized it was much easier to traverse to surface, rather than trying to walk like we would on earth, to instead hopping. They could cover more ground and use less energy because of the 1/6th gravity. So, they were practicing this, and at first they fell a lot. The center of gravity on their bodies mainly went towards their upper backs so they had to get use to this. I would imagine it would be very very different.
The moon landing was faked to bankrupt the USSR. I mean we can't go back to the moon and its been said so by nasa because ALL of the data disappeared and we somehow THAT LONG AGO we could live stream from the moon to earth? I call BULLSHIT. It was filmed in Nevada desert with cords.
Am I the only person who just realized I watched Joe Rogan say over and over how he no longer believes the moon landing was fake, while at the same time he lists nothing but reason after reason to doubt it?
Guys don't forget it was the 60s. There was no CGI yet. Not even by a long shot. Trying to make an entire planet believe that a fake moon landing is real seems nearly impossible to me. So yeah I agree with Tyson that it must've been way easier to actually go there.
A note on those Michael Collins photographs: There are no publications from NASA of that Michael Collins photo, nor are there any publications which suggest that it is from a real space walk. The image appears in some issues of Collins' autobiography, with the caption clearly stating that it was taken during a training exercise. Moon hoax theorist Ralph Rene first claimed that these images were passed off as genuine space walk photographs. In 2003, space historian James Oberg offered Rene 10,000 dollars for any edition of the Collins autobiography that described the doctored photograph as a spacewalk snapshot. Rene was unable to provide one, and so far nobody else has either.
You see this a lot in many flat-earth "proofs". They will take one picture, extremely out of context, and say "See! Its proof of flat earth!" Saddening, really.
All I'm saying, is that during a time when we as a civilization had such little understanding of technology that the internet had not even been invented yet, during a time when the floppy disk had not even been invented yet, during a time when the telephones still needed cords&wires... You're gonna tell me during this time that we were advanced enough into the age of technology to make it all the way to the moon 6 times...and we haven't been back since. You're gonna tell me that even though these telephones needed cords to operate, that somehow we as a civilization were advanced enough to communicate with these astronauts who were 100's of thousands of miles away... Through some strong ass radio waves?? I can't even get the radio to come in from my local station... This is what you are tryna have me believe?
i like how joe admitted his faults in the situation, and made rational and logical steps to fix it. This ability to correct oneself is one a rare and virtuous trait
yeah it's such a logical way of thinking....... were the videos fake?yes. were the photos fake?yes. was the moon landing fake?absolutely not. if the moon landing was real,there wouldn't be a need to fake the video/photos.
@@bigoshify he’s not even racist, your jus unintelligent and believe what the media says, which proves to make people look worse than they are literally every single day. People like you make this life shit
This is why I admire Joe as a person. I may not agree with him on everything, but he's well read and always looking out for when he's wrong and how he could be better. That's a rare quality to find in a person.
Whatever. He censors his true beliefs depending on who he's talking to. He genuinely believed Ronda Rousy could beat men in the ufc... Until she lost two rights.
Puff Ball he's hardly well read. reading random books doesn't make one well read, reading the books of conspiracy theory authors can actually make you more ignorant.
The picture of Michael Collins' spacewalk is from his book and isn't attributed to NASA at all. It was doctored specifically to use as a visual representation of the event due to the fact there aren't any actual pictures of it. The camera they were using became loose and drifted off into space so all the images were lost. Collins says all this in the book and never claims that it's real, which no one ever mentions. It was *NEVER* published by NASA.
Just to add, his autobiography was published in the early to mid 70s long before the hoax stuff started to become insane in and of itself. I have inquired many aerospace engineers about the hoax and all of them, with a 40 year age differential (so at least 2 to 3 generations of engineers) point out that it is not just possible, but more than probable that the US landed on the moon. The technology was there and was built, with much of today's jet engines and other advanced rocket technology all based on the work done back in the late 60s. Most of the other factors people bring up, like the lost footage and data, is actually explainable and not anything that leads to the concept of a hoax in any way. Early data of the B2 bomber was misplaced and lost and that was in 1987 (the B2 launching officially in 1989), in which they had to spend another two years of testing to get the B2 project off the ground. I know this because my own father worked on the B2 project and that info was openly disclosed to the public by Northrop Grumman after parts of the B2 project were disclosed by the government and made available to the public. So if the government can loose data on one of their most coveted stealth projects, then why not 20 years ago when it was the highest part of the Cold War when the various government agencies were loosing data and research left and right on all types of projects (some of it even proved to be lost in order to keep it away from the Soviets). Also, they lost camera footage of the B2 test flights from the left wing because the damn camera fell off. Again, if it can happen on Earth under perfect testing conditions, it could and is more likely to happen in space (with regards to the camera drifting off into space). Engineers could only predict what could happen and most people who worked on the Apollo 11 project have stated that many things went wrong even through the mission was a success. Just because a layman doesn't understand the details doesn't mean that the details don't exists. Many documentaries and books have doctored photos in them that were not the photos provided by NASA. I would not be surprised that some of the photos being propped up as Hoax evidence were doctored photos and footage not from NASA, but made for the books and documentaries they came from and being thrown out as facts. Many Hoax sites don't even cite their photos or footage from real sources. I remember buying a book where a Hoax site claimed one of the false NASA photos came from and I went, bought the book the site cited, and the photo was not in that book, nor were three others used as "proof" that the moon landing was a hoax. Perhaps because making a case for the moon landing Hoax is profitable conspiracy click-bait, people are willing to invest more effort into finding anything they can that would aid their case than to disprove their case, thus making many hoax creators no longer objective to the truth.
All of that set aside the fact that they cannot go to the moon in present day and have lost all of the data and knowledge of the trip to the moon is a little bewildering in itself
They can go to the moon still lol. China brought samples back from the moon only last week and NASA is sending another manned mission as soon as 2026. The difference is the leap in technology, before they used Saturn V an insanely powerful - yet outdated and hard to replicate rocket.. now they will be using SLS - a much more consistent and easier to replicate launch vehicle. These things take a lot of time to develop hence the gap in manned missions
I'm not even going to use scientific explanation to disagree with you but rather just use common sense the moon isnt just down the street its very far I have no doubt we can go there but getting there would cost billions and alot of political hurdles theres nothing there of substantial value that would require for a manned journey to be there as soon as possible plus with everything so expensive you want to go to the moon now???💀💀
So... Why are people calling out Joe? He's admitting that he was wrong about the conspiracy...and changed his mind... And he's being honest about it... That's exactly what a wise man does
because they don't know how to take things in context, they hear the words of doubt come out of his mouth and their brain shuts off and they just get outraged and start posting. they're idiots.
@@TheAlaskanfrog for one who said I'm a right winger, in response to the other dude how am I incapable of critical thinking if I don't believe the moon landings were real and am disagreeing with joe rogan which both require me to think critically since I am not agreeing with the majority
10:06 Joe Rogan it wasn’t in Berlin. V-2 rocket factory was in Peenemünde and after city was bombarded by allies they moved to Poland to Blizne. I was born in city 10 miles from Blizne.
Rogan might be one of the most educated people on this Earth about the most controversial moments of our humanity , he has a collection of interviews that rivals any other organization on topics such as the pyramids, the moon, ufos… so many others. I have to tip my hat to him… he has managed to visit all these topics while still holding respect from just about every type of person regardless of beliefs or policial parties. ❤
In Joe's defense he is entitled to open his mind to the idea of changing his mind. They call that a critical thinking skill that not many have. The spiff is a human construct that makes all the possibilities plausible.
He changed when his handlers told him to stop speaking out against them. He isn’t paid as well as he is, and put into positions to influence so many young impressionables just so he can call the powers that be dirty liars.
I always find it amusing how much people attribute power to people with an audience lol.. illuminati people crack me up. They all claim the most greedy, power hungry, and manipulative people in the world can somehow work together towards a common higher goal despite thier greed? Lolol yea right.. your mind is just doing what it does best.. making the irrational seem rational so a simpleton can understand it
T.D. McCarty I guess you’re talking to me? It’s hard to say for sure, since nobody here has made any prior mention of the Illuminati. You’re the simpleton if you are actually so naive that you don’t believe the richest of the rich don’t do everything within their power to preserve their power, and everything just happens by nature. I mean sure, your explaination is so much more rational. If you’re listening to a guy that has his mind changed over what someone tells him while he’s stoned, then you are obviously of far superior intellect. You should be invited to sit in with the bilderberg group. Oh, yeah. Never mind. They don’t exist. One question for you, boy genius. Did we land on the moon, or not? Save you cute little insults, and your talking down. You’ve already done too much that.just answer the question. Please. Thanks.
I think he appreciated it, smiled in his head and his guest felt the vibe because he was waiting for his question and he was so serious and concentrated on the topic he continued to move forward so he didn’t lose concentration
Joe’s ability to re-examine his previous beliefs or assumptions in such a humble manner, and admits mistakes all while holding himself accountable, are very rare traits in any person these days. This is why so many of us respect him and makes his podcast the biggest on the planet Hats off to you man….
It's funny cause while I do disagree with you, it's because I still think he's a conspiracy lunatic pushing junk science, and that he regressed from this position.
Well, its the only known object/moon in space, that doesnt rotate around its own axis. We always see that same side of the moon, hence "The dark side of the moon". Take a second and think about that...
Another thing to consider is that the Soviet Union never accused the US of faking the moon landings. You'd think if it we never went there not only would the Soviets be able to tell but they'd be the first ones to blow the whistle. But they didn't.
The Soviets didnt 'go' but they were tracking the whole mission for sure, both Radar and radio intercepts and if there was anything suspect they would have everything to gain by revealing it and making NASA and the US look stupid.
The Russians would have been able to receive the transmissions from the moon. Beyond that, they would know that the transmissions were originating on the moon. Other advanced nations could do the same thing. There's no mystery here.
For anyone confused about them “looking different” you can learn exactly why this happened online. The astronauts had to learn how to move a 300lb restrictive suit in 1/6th gravity. The suit was lighter but very restrictive. They had to learn all new mechanics for moving around. Regular walking didn’t work. First guys wobbled a bit and shared their data when they got home. Next teams tried new mechanics and found that bouncing worked. Later missions were a combination of bouncing and bounding. There’s a lot of footage of astronauts trying out new ways to walk and falling on their asses.
Yip they tried everything from 1 foot to shuffling. Some of its pretty funny too. Also not one rocket or craft was the same as the one before. Every one was an improvement as they learnt more. Hence the buggy on later missions. I wouldnt be surprised if the suits changed too.
@TheAwwyee Fudging grain exports is one thing, faking the moon landing is something else. They would've disseminated the word among their own people and by banging their shoes at the UN. We would've called them liars and most Americans would believe it but it would still be out in the open. Most people in the world do not mind seeing the USA knocked down a peg or three. It's way too spicey of a meatball to leave hanging out there.
Joe you are right, film used to get damaged in early xray machines at airports. Later they started saying that new machines wouldn’t damage the film but i used to still not let them pass exposed film just in case. I used to work in film production from early 2001-2008
@@nielsm.2147 Conformity and being able to learn, to not be stubborn or ignorant in your attitude towards certain ideas based on personal preference at the time is generally considered intelligent behaviour.
He clearly still thinks it was faked as this whole video is him talking about the evidence towards it, then saying he's not a rocket scientist so he's not aloud to form an opinion.
IMO, Joe's flip/flop statements are the product of a man who knows the truth(of course the moon landings are a lie!) but he's been told or warned to back off of that conspiracy. If anyone thinks Joe has free reign, they're dreaming! The same evil people that control our gov'ts, control ALL media. Losing his job would be the least of it. Joe or anyone from his family can be framed & jailed, taken out/ "commit suicide" as fast as any of us. We have quotes from past presidents & congressman saying they know the hidden power(shadow gov't) behind the scenes and they know what not to say and what lines not to cross(John & Bobby Kennedy, for example, had a nasty habit of crossing those lines). Bottom line, even if Joe's loyalty was 100% on the people's side(which I highly doubt), he would know or be told what lines not to cross or they'd just get another puppet.. I mean person to do the job
"joe why did you change your mind on the moon landing conspiracy?" "well i had Neil Degrasse Tyson on and he brought it up and I didn't want to look like an idiot"
@moofasa1211 "the psychics of helicopters" I'm picking up a strong '50 cal' sensation over here. Does the tail number 690720N have significance to anybody? Maybe with a camouflage paint?
Saturn v rocket was the most complex machine man ever created when our nation was at its strongest. We could never waste the resources on a project of that magnitude without sacrificing our military superiority that maintains our quality of life.
@@darrinbrooks5916 that was kind of my point. Heaven forbid we do something resourceful with the global GDP it's so sad a fraction of 1% of the people dictate the world order
We maintain 750 military bases outside of our country USA them resources alone would maintain a small colony on Mars but the price of oil would probably be $200+ and we wouldn't be able to maintain our quality of life $25 gallon for fuel
I love how Joe can be impartial to the point of learning from his own mistakes and look at it objectively and with such logical reasoning. That's a great thinker. Healthy mind. Loved it.
rogan logical? hes super rich. so what? hes still basically a dullard. love his show though. Rogan is proof that ANYONE can make it , and Rogan, an anyone, has!!
liam white Rogan is the worst kind of shill. He initially supported controversial ideas to create a following for his podcast. Now he's popular he's turning mainstream.
This is probably the single most important conversation that I've ever heard from Joe Rogan. Be humble in what you believe, and try to see things from all sides. We need to compare what we know with what new things we've learned and adapt to a better argument.
I thought the same thing! This is a look at someone who literally said: "I had to critique myself". That's something we ALL, including myself, need to acknowledge. Not just "today", but through time
This is the reason why I watch Joe. His humility and in-depth courage to be introspective is uncommon amongst podcasters today. Most podcasters are cowards in fear of being human. Our minds are malleable. Most of our ideas and preconceived notions aren't ours. They come from our experiences, interactions, and debates with others who may or may not be educated on the subject.
joey weird I just finished the church with Joey Diaz and Jesus trejo and your name is Joey and my Avi is Jesus the astronaut; This video is talking about moon landings and the podcast ended with break these chains by Cornell. ? Wormhole coincidence? Idk
Yeah, I can kinda agree, I don't see people change their stances on stupid things like this very often, I think that fact is a symptom of the world being stupid rather than it being the cause. But yeah, I can kinda agree that it is stupid that they are praising him over it
It is bold, because we as a species are primed to assign value to consistency, so you don't wanna come out as someone who changes his position on things often or at all to the public. But there could be a reverse effect where people go like" he knows the risk of disclosing thay he changed his mind, but he does it however, so that shows courage and integrity." so you get points for it.
@NeoLegolasSkywalkerStark Your comment suggests you are leaving yourself out of that equation which is another problem with this world. Everybody is so quick to call everyone else stupid while pretending they are one of the few smart ones. That's about as stupid as it gets.
TBF he punched him because he'd been following Aldrin around harassing and insulting him with his family. It was only after putting up with that for a while that he slugged him.
If you see the video, that's putting what the moron did lightly. He followed him around saying "swear on the bible you went to the moon.. swear on the bible" like a fucking lunatic.. Which is funny lunatic comes from moon.. Hadn't thought about that until i wrote that. He kept following him and following him.. Until he punched him. Wasn't unprovoked and it wasn't a spur of the moment thing.
My Dad was an aeronautical engineering for NASA and was able to take my sisters and I to the Smithsonian Institute for Air and Space to tell us all about the space program...he was able to show his little girls the part on the Moon Lander that he helped design... there is no reason for him to have done such a thing, to have made the effort to teach his daughters about what he had done in his life, if it was a hoax...it was just a little coil thingamajig, but it's on the Moon and my Dad was a part of that... I couldn't be more proud that my Dad helped accomplish such an amazing feat...
Lisa Jacobs That sounds like an amazing thing. I would have loved to have been there listening to him explain. My uncle worked for NASA as well, in the photography so he dealt with all kinds of cameras and the pictures they took. I could listen to him talk all day even though many times it gets waaay too advanced, and consider I did great physics in college. Great post, Lisa.
My dad used to say that he recalled being underwhelmed when he saw the actual footage of the first landing as they’d done very convincing mock-ups in TV studios and dramatic interpretations of the landings.
Have you seen some of that mock ups? They look like grade school play productions. That the video wasn’t great and the moon is very barren doesn’t make you dad’s reaction important to the world.
The technical term for getting out of your car is extravehicular activity. Phew ! Phenomenal nomenclature, glad you clarified it, thanks. Now I'm going to the cocoa bean dispenser to add some atoms of Hydrogen (2 of) and Oxygen (1 of) at 20°C at sea level to boil at 100°C. Or you could say I'm going to make a cup of coffee.
@@alexandermacdougall7873 But my entire point is that if you could show him why it's a false conspiracy, he will understand and agree without fussing over cognitive bias. Surely you've found some damming evidence that the rest of us haven't seen? Otherwise perhaps YOU are guilty of cognitive and confirmation bias.
15:20 Absolutely spot on. The people passing opinions on what is or is not fake often, in fact mostly, have from what I observe, very poor knowledge of basics sciences. They happily denounce true occurrences with zero understanding of the topic and if called out they denounce you, or walk away, refusing to eat their BS words.
"Ignorance is such a gift. It gives you the opportunity to learn something, if you're humble enough"
Best. Quote. Ever.
@@dietermiller8977 gamer epic hell yeah
ignorance is a gift. then you say brest. HAHAHAHAHA!!!! Sorry. that shit is funny!
IF YOU’RE HUMBLE ENOUGH. Most people are not.
Ignorance is NOT a gift. You can be well informed and still have the opportunity to learn.
No. Wrong. Look at all the evidence.
The fact that the cost of cheese has dropped astronomically since Apollo 11 is all I need to know about whether we've been on the moon.
lol dude the price of cheese is high right now. it was way cheaper then.
For thousands of years, mankind thought the moon was made of cheese
We sent someone up there and found out it was a rock, and we never went back
Ha ha.
Good point
Cheeeeeeeese gromit 😬
"It is the sign of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" -Aristotle
For a few years now I’ve been entertaining the thought that Donald Trump is the President of the United States, and yet I cannot bring myself to accept it.
@@JohnnyArtPavlou I hear you! You did entertain it.... nice work.
@@JohnnyArtPavlou my 401 K definitely accepts it!!!! African Americans accept it with African American employment at its highest Ever! The Hispanics accept it with unemployment at its lowest in their community ever! Europe and China are now realizing they cannot continue with unfair trade against the USA...yep all good! AND we landed on the Moon! So did China
@@SR-fb7yp calm down you goddamn Boomer, it's a fucking joke you spaz
@@SR-fb7yp Someone get grandpa's medical gummies he's screeching again.
Anyone who can call themselves out for not being objective is legit just a solid human... This is why his podcast is amazing.
Slicker is Quicker... Joe if you cover yourself in a Space Blanket it's harder for the Dark Side of the Moon to.Control you.
It's a DeathStar
That's because if they showed you the real footage you might see C3PO & R2D2
You are not dumb Joe... Joe I d
had friends who were photographers
At least you've moved to Texas...
It was absolutely staged. NASA hired Kubrick to direct the footage. The thing is, he's a stickler for realism and insisted on filming on location.
M G underrated comment
@@PlopstoperGames i wish I came up with it myself. I can't remember where i heard it.
@Wes Porter they're making strides in treating brain damage, you should see a neurologist.
@itchy AIDS i didn't claim to make up the joke.
@Wes Porter you called me a brain washed stooge because I made a joke. So yes, I did insult your intelligence in turn.
And you insult the intelligence of every single person who works or has worked on the space program every time you let that abortion of a conspiracy theory escape your mouth like so much diarrhea.
Tl;Dr: go fuck yourself.
When I don't know the answer to something, I just go to the comments where all the experts are.
Brilliant
😅
The comments always have the answers.
All the astrophysicists here are amazing
Bruh this is the most underrated comment ever
"People are afraid to say I don't know."
- So much error would be burned up if more people understood this.
There is a type of people who respond to "I don't know" with, "you therefore dont know anything, and I know for sure." More people do need to be honest with themselves and be skeptical about their own beliefs. When Socrates said "all I know is that I know nothing" publicly that was a kind of brave act.
That's my take on religion. Heaven, hell, God, and satan...I don't know. A person can believe all they want but in reality. Religion, all of them are he said, she said stories pasted down from generation to generation. Interpreted by different people in their own words! I don't know or understand the "word of god" because it's man who is preaching it😒
Not really dude there's nothing wrong with having a guess offcourse we don't know that's obvious i say i don't know all the time religion don't know when my misses asks me who left the toilet seat up don't know😉✌
Trump
I completely agree. I don’t fully understand everything. I’ve got a very good grasp of most things. The conclusion I’ve drawn is that we’ve went to the moon, but I don’t think it happened when they said it did. I also think they fake a ton of the space station videos. I’ve seen the cables etc. it’s obvious. But I have no idea why they would...
'I never said all that shit'
- Albert Einstein
he didn’t do his math work either. his wife did it. einstein sucks.
@@youarenotme01he used Chat GPT
😂😂😂😂😂preciate you for giving me a good laugh
A wise man changes his mind,
a fool never does.
Word
He trolls idiots.
That would make everyone who believes the moon landing was real a fool... seeing as that's the default standpoint.
You'd have to be a pretty big fucking idiot to have thought it was fake in the first place.
@@HanSoloxcs you cannot say that having doubts is the mark of a fool
2:50 He's partially correct. The image on the right IS doctored, but not by NASA. It was doctored for Michael Collin's Autobiography because he was upset that they NASA never took footage of his actual spacewalk. So he included a doctored image of his "spacewalk" in the book.
Bolensgoldrush one question always rises is. Why haven’t they been back to the moon. When they done it in the sixties.
@@enkaan1676 Cause I don't want to pay for it. We seen it. There's rocks there. We have much cheaper rocks here.
@@enkaan1676 it's expensive, there's no point in doing it, what can we even get from the moon at this point and it uses up too much resources
@@enkaan1676 Let's reverse the question - why should we go back?
Lordidude exactly
Self-critiquing is a sign of maturity.
Very very true
And wisdom
I was just thinking this! Can you imagine if the whole world could humbly admit sometimes they don't know what the fuck they're talking about? 😅
That’s a very low bar for maturity. Joe rogan is as dumb as rocks
Not true, you can be mature but still ignore self improvement
A spacewalk is also called an EVA. EVA stands for extravehicular activity. The first person to go on a spacewalk was Alexei Leonov
Yes, and we see our beautifully spherical earth from the footage shot on a film camera from that day as well.
this mf plays kerbal
That’s also the title of a pretty good ambient techno record from 1995.
“Two can keep a secret, if one is dead.”
Japanese proverb
"Three may keep a secret if two of them are dead." -Benjamin Franklin.
Am i being r/woosh -ed here or is that from the Pretty Little Liars theme song.
Thomas it was a quote before being in the open but yeah, similar to the tune.
@@Ihad9eyes 4 people can keep a secret..if you tell them.. right before they were killed
By : Neil Armstrong
Well , I think there's a difference between stealing a quote and trying to pass it off as an original and embellishing a quote to make it more salient to your own point. In this case , the Japanese proverb is asture and minimal,, Franklin inflates the situation with customary Yankee bombast. I don't buy that Armstrong quote though.
It was fake, I've been to the moon. The geezer there said he's never seen Americans till Netflix came along
John Mascardo underrated
was his name Frank Sinatra?
@@groverkiinmuppetborn714 you've been too?
@@johnmascardo7047 nah just a feeling
@@Ali-kp7bh What?
"The government always tells the truth"
- The Government
"We find the CIA not guilty of torturing innocent test subjects"
- The Government
The FBI was under investigation and was found not guilty of any bias
- The Government
😂👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 That was a good one! Unfortunately the government lies more than they tell the truth!
Hahahhaa lmfao
🤣
'Have you ever seen the video of a bear in a space suit?'
Jamie pull up the video of the bear in a spacesuit...
"Even the shit I feel like I know I still feel like I don't know"
-Socrates
Really.. Socrates said *_shit_*
@@larryjohnny its a joke... that went waaaay over your head it seems....
"Don't believe everything you read on the internet"
-Isaac Newton.
He was just paraphrasing lol
r/whoosh
“Everything that’s posted on the internet is true”.
-Abraham Lincoln
Throttlelifeby jt 🤣🤣
Good to know..I always thought George Washington said that.
@@thtoneguy0321 sorry I think you're both wrong, I'm pretty sure Julius Caesar said that
Wasn't that Jesus Christ?
@@coiledsteel8344 oh wait that rings a bell, wait no, could it have been Brian of Jerusalem? He was the Messiah and I should know, I've followed a few.
"I think it gets really scary when you want to be right, that you're willing to ignore things that would otherwise show that you're wrong"
Joe Rogan
You misquoted it so wrong lmao
@@papimew2672 no I didn't..
@@papimew2672 ignorant troll
Joshua Hooker yea you did lmao
Joshua Hooker 7:03
i always end up finding good episodes from these highlights
Buzz Aldrin would be a perfect guest for Joe Rogan. He has no filter whatsoever and would tell Joe everything he needs to know about project Apollo so that he never gets mixed up again.
I have met Buzz countless times and he is such an ass-whole but I agree!
@@brianemery-lundstrom9382 a whole ass
@@fraguladotvee8959 lmao
Wes Porter we never went back be cause we lack the will to do it. BTW, lunar reconnaissance orbiter photographed the Apollo landing sites back in 2009.
John Lydon what’s the “truth”
This is why I like Joe Rogan. He is smart enough to know he isn't the smartest. He is willing to reevaluate his position with new informations.
PEOPLE PHOTOSHOP SOME PICTURES?/ AND YOU BELIEVE THEM?? PEOPLE FUCK YOU ALL!! TAKE A SCOPE AND AIM IT AT THE MOON? YOU WILL SEE THE LANDING SITES DUE TO NO AIR ON THE MOON?? WHAT NEXT JOE BELIEVE BECAUSE OF PHOTOSHOP THE WORLD FLAT?? ALL THEY PROVED IS YOU DIDNT LISTEN IN SCHOOL. WHY NOT TALK TO SOMEONE WHO BEEN THERE, ASS WIPE.
@@brucesweatmaniii6030 calm down there leonidas
@@brucesweatmaniii6030 people like you should just be given crayons and pictures to draw
I think we all saw that he isn't the smartest
@@brucesweatmaniii6030 You realize they have video? And that they only had film cameras then? And that photoshop didn't exist?
People are afraid to say “I don’t know” because they think it makes them look stupid for not knowing, but pretending to know when you don’t makes you look 100 times more stupid... What’s wrong with not knowing?
@David Stunning Nobody started this trend, it's a part of human nature. Ego is human nature. Stupidity is human nature.
Yeah I think we can all agree with that sentiment but at the same time we have to realise we are limited cognitively and we're naturally programmed to think like that. We can't be too hard on ourselves.
What I learned in public school was being wrong was a reason to be ridiculed. So many of my classmates were quick to laugh at anyone who answered a question wrong, or look at them in utter disbelief as if to say "are you mentally retarded?"
The issue is the response to being wrong. If being wrong is met with ridicule then people will either A) stop participating or B) go out of their way to be right
Nicely put, except in this case we do know.
Control is the most basic and necessary human illusion, and the least realistic. People will always feel a need to know, or at the very least FEEL as though they know. This gives us a sense of control over ourselves and the subject of our thinking, and with that comfort. That need will never really go awah
This is one of the main reason i admire Joe. He's able to revisit an opinion he once had and admit he may have been wrong, and rationalise why.
Lol, it's pretty rare he does that. I mean, if he acted _too_ normal how would he get batshit crazy conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, Terrence Howard, and Kat Williams to come on his show?
He is just trying to make himself look good the way he is doing this. All he had to say was he wasn't smart enough to know and made shit up because he believed other stupid people. Its called using you're platform to spread misinformation instead of staying out of topics you know nothing about so you don't spread you're own stupidity.
Yea unlike the comment dweebs who think they know everything lol
@@jasonuhrinek8393 Maybe you're right. But if somebody changed their opinion they don't have to say all that imo. Just pointing out how they were wrong should be enough I think..
@@hiranom20 He continues doing it though. His show at this point is mostly just rhetoric and misinformation. You can pretend it's harmless or recognize it for the societal cancer it is. When people like him give shills a platform they're effectively promoting that shill's agenda whether that's their intention or not. I mean, for Christ's sake, he's friends with Alex Jones; i.e. the man who claims school shootings are "false flag events" despite blatant and obvious evidence to the contrary. Eventually he'll have someone on that says something stupid enough, and or, say something stupid enough himself to get himself cancelled. He's too much of a thick moron not to, and he buys into his own hype at this point. At the end of the day he makes his living asking celebrities questions and describing adults beating the shit out of each other.
This was cool. He thought it was faked. Looked at it objectively. And realized he was wrong, and changed his beliefs to match the facts. Subscription earned!
He clearly still thinks it was faked as this whole video is him talking about the evidence towards it, then saying he's not a rocket scientist so he's not aloud to form an opinion.
If only flat earthers and religious could do the same thing...
If only he could get eddie bravo to do that!
He thinks some photographs are fake, but he said he doesn't know whether he thinks we went to the moon or not (8:32)
@@deathfeeds i believe we have been on the moon but some footage is faked due to the camera and film getting damaged
"Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently" - Wernher Von Braun:
It’s extremely difficult for me to have any respect for anyone who seriously thought that the moon landing was faked. It’s scary that people that foolish have the right to vote.
@@tonyduncan9852 Sir you can't be serious, the irony on your comment is over the top. That video of the AK carrying monkey is a publicity video for the Rise of the Apes movie, you can read it on the description and you can see the 20th Century Fox water mark on the bottom left of it. Indeed very scary ;)
No worries, Ed. The whole point is that it is only our capabilities that matter.
@@tonyduncan9852 Fair enough sir, Thanks for the laugh though, that was a funny video to watch. In this case we can observe though how good we became at faking stuff and that if we want to believe it, we will. So we might as well throw the Moon landing deniers a bone or two, cheers!
@@MetalGuitarEdi "throw the Moon landing deniers a bone or two" - not a single thing. The video taken from the buggies of the Moonlanders (and also of the astronauts climbing into them) taking off is a visual proof. That torn pieces of gold-plated melinex film were torn off by the rocket exhaust and flew away in straight lines without slowing down or dropping, tells anyone with a working ability to see that those are the consequences of both a vacuum and low gravity. These shots were taken at least a decade before any type of digital colour video synthesis existed.
My favourite part of the moon landing conspiracy is Neil Armstrongs name backward is A lien
HOLY S....
blew my mind. 😯😄 it all fits.
Even worse it's Sgnortsmra Lien
Gnorts mr Alien ? lol
No, it gnortsmrA lieN.
Guess that REALLY proves he has been to the moon, or even from the moon... maybe Apollo 11 left a dummy there and brought Niel to earth.
My favorite conspiracy theory is still "NASA killed Michael Jackson because if you Google Moon Walk Michael comes up first and they were pissed"
I appreciate people appreciating this video which I appreciated.
And I appreciate your appreciating people appreciating this video.
I can appreciate that
Appreciate it
Much appreciated guys
I was entertained & amused by the idiocy & TBH if I was offended & irritated by the content I'd still give it a Thumbs-Up as Joe Rogan & his channel is by and large Quality St.
If the moon landing is fake, where do we get our cheese from?
KND haha
Just DESTROYED the denyers
I love you for this.
Such a valid point
Shmacked Muffins You just made the list
I wish everybody would try to approach conspiracy theories in this way. Evaluating what facts we know and the likelihood of different outcomes. I respect Joe for evolving his view and being willing to talk about it
ok what?
Oh my god shut up with that crap lol
Evolving for some, de-volving for others
I don't know enough about "the science" (rocket or otherwise) either. I DO know HUMAN NATURE and part of that "science" is knowing that individuals and people lie, and obfuscate, and otherwise BAMBOOZLE people for ALL SORTS OF REASONS, (not excluding the reason[s] of just sheer amusement, and the "reason" regarding the proverbial dog and his balls.....And why he licks them).
I also know that people who may not INTENTIONALLY be lying often spout off MISINFORMATION---again for a variety of reasons, the main one being that some authority figure told them repeatedly that "y+y" equals "x", OR.... Since EVERYBODY ELSE claims that "y+y"= "x" and it's supposedly "common knowledge", only an "idiot" would claim otherwise, so why even QUESTION it? Never mind CHALLENGE it??
Also...."y+y" MAY INDEED equal "x", but those who know HOW and WHY that is true, often cannot or WILL NOT explain the answers to "lesser minds" to those two questions of "HOW" and "WHY".
(Never mind the answers to that OTHER 3 letter question, and the remaining 4--letter questions.)
The assassination of JFK may NOT have been a "conspiracy", despite SO MANY claims otherwise. HOWEVER......."Lone gunman" or not, the SCIENCE of FORENSICS indicate that Lee Harvey Oswald was NOT the only shooter. (Or to put it more succinctly, THE SCIENCE of FORENSICS indicates NONE of Lee Harvey Oswald's bullets were responsible for entering JFK's cranium.)
WHY do I bring this up? Just merely to POINT OUT that even though "FACTS MATTER", the IMPLICATION and/or RAMIFICATIONS of facts might MATTER MORE!! I also bring it up because REGARDLESS if the MOON LANDINGS were faked, IT IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE for a COVER-UP to occur from a large group of people--in the JFK case, the Warren Commission, and the rest of the United States Government.
Take something more tragic and recent: September 11th, 2001. REGARDLESS of whether one believes there was a conspiracy behind that day, or one accepts the "official narrative", there are A LOT of UNASKED and UNANSWERED questions about that day, and the time period PRIOR leading up to it.
(And such questions have NOTHING to do with the supposedly "smoking gun" of Building No. 7.)
Bottom line? Mockery of Moon Landing Conspiracy theorists MAY NOT be appropriate. But since the MOON LANDINGS did NOT involve the loss of innocent lives, I personally do NOT lose a lot of sleep over the event one way or another. If you have read this comment in its entirety, thank you for your attention.
when you become targeted and blacklisted by the government you start to see things in a different light. i know first hand i got a gift from my grandfather who was in charge of security for a division of nasa and that gift just keeps giving and giving and giving. Guess who stoped making fun of his paranoid uncle.
I love to tell people "I don't know." Because it's usually followed by learning something new...
i had a boss, that hated when people told her "i dont know" and she always went on a rant about it, i told her i can lie and make something up if you prefer. that job sucked, that was 1.5 years ago and they still havent found a replacement for me
The thing is they have created a society that doesn't know what's true or not and can't defend themselves.
On purpose
I couldn’t have said it better. The government lies more than they tell the truth and unfortunately most people in society now are conditioned to except everything they’re being told instead of doing any critical thinking. Our government doesn’t want critical thinkers, they want obedient workers.
Absolutely true...they have bent twisted the truth so much...that people can't be sure of anything...and all done on purpose...
How would it be any other way though? You can’t be an expert at everything so you have to trust other peoples word at some point.
I think that’s just a fact of humanity not something engineered by “them”
Not true in the slightest lol
"I appreciate you appreciated it"
*Everyone liked that*
Fuck up
@@maxd363 ok, but how does calling yourself a "fuck up" contribute in any way to the topic at hand?
@@snailsaredumb9412 you better shut the fuck up
@@maxd363 u ok
@@maxd363 woe calm down max!
When _Mythbusters_ dealt with this, Jamie went to New Mexico and talked to a little readhead radio astronomer, who happens to be the wife of a friend of mine. She demonstrated to Jaime how ANYONE with the fairly available equipment can aim a radio or laser at any of the landing zones and get bounce back confirmation.
We watched that in class years ago, I still don't understand why this conspiracy is still a thing...
tiger_howe we’ve definitely been to the moon. But we’re we really there the first time? I believe we were but entertain the idea for a bit.
True....but a LOT of people are under the assumption that people can view items on the moon landing site with an Earth bound telescope which is not true at all. BUT they CAN....with the right equipment.....do what you just stated above which is just as amazing. The USA AND other countries HAVE seen items left on the moon but only by doing fly by's when they were launching a space probe. This has been done not only by the USA but by other countries so IF there was really nothing there.....that would have been exposed long ago.
It is pretty weird to people how we can see sooooooo far away into other galaxies with our Earth bound telescopes yet cannot see objects from the moon landing on the moon. Still, they cannot wrap their heads around HOW small those objects are on the moon and how truly far the moom actually is from Earth......and how massive and bright those other galaxies really are we see in outer space. It is soooooo crazy and distances soooo massive it is really hard for humans to reallly, truly comprehend.
The known observable Universe is amazing and to think of how unimaginably massive the areas are that we will NEVER, EVER see due to the limitations of the speed of light. It is mind numbing.
@Lady Mercy I'm sorry but that is absolutely preposterous. Simple math proves that the Delta V required to fly an entire studio to the moon wasn't available in the Saturn V rocket, let alone the fact that going to the moon to then fake a moon landing is pointless.
@@LSPD1909 I think you might still be drunk on stage coz I thought that was an obvious joke
neil said the best thing about it, "it would be easier to just go to the moon"
no its much easier to pretend you went to the moon especially if you have been trying to go to the moon for the last decade and have all the simulations and equipment
Neil is a puppet, like a bobblehead that the government puts quarters in.
Yes cause the hundreds of thousands of people who all worked on it all lied about the same thing their wholes lives and were in on it to a tee. Get with it man. Use your brain.
@@LemanoftheRussVI no why does everybody have to know about it being fake, for example everybody at the VW plant doesn't know that they are adding a device in the car to cheat emissions testing, only a few people know
@yostaustin well, if it was a hoax, those hundreds of thousands of people who worked on it may not even be aware of it being a hoax.
Its possible that the majority of people involved with the programs 100% believed their work was actually being contributed towards the goal.
If it was a hoax id suspect only a handful of folks would know the trurh.
My personal opinion is this... theres many inconsistencies that dont add up. The biggest one that stands out the most to me is that we havent went back (or possible never even been there) some claim this is because the motivation is gone, the original motivation being the space race.
But the fact is that the moon is loaded with precious resources that are rare on earth. If we could go there in the 1960s, why hasnt any operations been begun to begin mining/collecting these resources?
Additionally its said that nasa intentionally destroyed their research and data involving the apollo programs. As such its now perpetuated that scientists simply cant figure out how they did it back then. Issues such as their instrument panels woulx be damaged by the radiation belt etc prevents modern expeditions to the moon.
It just doesnt make a lot of sense. But, it is a romantic notion that we went to the moon.
If we really landed on the moon we would have found Decepticons.
thats on the dark side of the moon. we only saw the light side
We did! Megatron! 🙄 duh!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦🏿♂️
@@kardia5672 but everyone knows the soviets landed on the dark side.......and never returned
Its fairly well know their last chaotic transmission included screaming about a giant purple robot with a single eye and an arm cannon
Clearly they were annihilated by Shockwave
Obviously
And don't get me started about that I'll fated soviet misadventure to Venus.............
All those soviet cosmonauts being tried in the Quintesson's propaganda show trial overseen by the Imperial Magistrates and unfortunately being found innocent 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈
@@shooter7734 come again nigga
Joe "I've looked at alot of compelling documentaries" Rogan
Watch the morning landing video. You dont need to go through all the him hob that joe rogan and pal just spoke about to see that it was fabricated.
@@owennickell8358 as an Aerospace engineer, you have insulted me. If you can follow the math, I can show you the orbital mechanics which show we can do it.
@@natemoorman4562 show me you can actually do it instead of launching a rocket into the bermuda triangle
@@natemoorman4562 im not disputing your orbital mechanics, im saying the moon landing video looks like really bad theater. Considering how much better television is today contrary to what is was back then, and our experience of its capability. It makes sense that the wool may have just been pulled over ours and our grandparents eyes.
Owen Nickell If you believe the moon landing is fake, you don’t deserve access to the internet. In fact you should be locked up in a psych ward.
“Ignorance is a gift. It gives you an opportunity to learn something if you’re humble enough”
that’s some solid advice right there
Who is he? Mad respect for knowing correlation =/= causation
Fee Arian foster
Dudes into spirituality
Stupid , ignorant people are usually very confident about their imagined superior abilities . Sometimes called the Dunning Kruger effect.
I was very close friends with a fellow for many years who was an aeronautical engineer who was closely involved in the engineering/planning of the 1969 moon landing mission. (And other prior and post NASA projects.
The 1969l was not a hoax.
In fact, in recognition of his work on the mission he was gifted a chunk of moon rock which he displayed in his office for the rest of his life.
He was a 35+ year member of the U.S. Airforce and was involved in many clandestine operations over the course of his career.
He would not have lied to me on this issue.
😂😂😂😂😂
“Appreciate it. I appreciate you, appreciating it”
Most people mix facts with their own opinions, and start believing their opinions are facts. Understanding the difference between a fact and your conclusion about the fact, is when you truly start to mature and read life with wisdom.
I hope this comment ends up at the top.
This is such a long way of saying “keep an open mind”
@@GibboFrank it all depends on the lighting conditions. The Hasselblad cameras used on the moon had to be set up before launch to a specific aperture by guessing how bright the surface of the moon would be. As is evidenced by the literally thousands of pictures taken on the moon (including full 360 degree panoramas) they hit it pretty good. The reason you can’t see stars in the moon pics is because the exposure setting wouldn’t allow for it. If the film had been exposed to show stars, everything else in the shot would have been blown out.
@@il9861 Considering the comments section on any given internet post, things need to be spelled out for people. :-)
@@GibboFrank are you saying the astronauts couldn’t see stars? My bad. I thought you meant in the pictures. That’s true, too. They were on the moon in full daylight with no atmospheric interference. The human eye works like a camera lens.
Very simple proof of the moon landing; when the astronauts landed on the moon they set up a retro-reflector. Its a big mirror that will reflect light right back towards it's source with minimal scattering. To this day astronomers are able to shine a laser towards the retro-reflector and the light from the laser will travel to the moon, hit the mirror and then return to the source of the laser. This is how physicists know how far the moon is from earth at any given time, its used for figuring out tidal forces for meteorology as well.
Not proof anyone was there. Rovers.
You're not an engineer. You don't work in aerospace. You know how I can tell?
Because you're too dim to work in these fields. Funny how the hoaxers always work on the bottom rungs of society.
@@edwardzeigler6437 Its simple to prove it went with humans; there are documents that show the cargo load of the rocket and also the people on it.
@@Evan-rl1rnThe biggest problem with the worst conspiracy theorists is that their conspiracies will extend as far as they needs to to confirm their beliefs.
Retro-reflector? It's a lie. It's not there. Any data from the reflector is faked. Documents confirming the cargo load that took it to the moon are faked. Anyone who claims to work with the reflector is lying.
No evidence is enough because any and all evidence is either faked or a lie. Anyone presenting evidence that is contrary to their beliefs is a liar or a government shill or a sheep. And on and on and on.
I'm not an engineer nor a doctor. Automatically discredited. Lmao. The logic is strong with these ones. Didng magic atheist Joe switch his stance on 911 for his sponsors also. Guess it's working to appease the main stream low IQ tools.
To explain why they walked differently from one mission to another is because during the missions, they realized it was much easier to traverse to surface, rather than trying to walk like we would on earth, to instead hopping. They could cover more ground and use less energy because of the 1/6th gravity. So, they were practicing this, and at first they fell a lot. The center of gravity on their bodies mainly went towards their upper backs so they had to get use to this. I would imagine it would be very very different.
😂😂😂
Russia never went to the moon because in Russia moon comes to you.
The moon landing was faked to bankrupt the USSR. I mean we can't go back to the moon and its been said so by nasa because ALL of the data disappeared and we somehow THAT LONG AGO we could live stream from the moon to earth? I call BULLSHIT. It was filmed in Nevada desert with cords.
CIA: You're on thin fucking ice buddy
Lol
They actually landed on the moon before us, just not with people. They had a remote controlled rover!
It's not because there exist a stupid comment that almost writes itself that people should do it...
Am I the only person who just realized I watched Joe Rogan say over and over how he no longer believes the moon landing was fake, while at the same time he lists nothing but reason after reason to doubt it?
He didn't say he doesn't believe it's fake, he said he doesn't know enough to say imperically that it is, or is not fake he's on the "idk Shi* fence"
its fake
@@bobbychuckles8764 alright folks that’s a wrap we’ve got our answer
@@WishMount You prove a positive not a negative. The burden of proof is on them and they have failed to anyone using rational objective thought.
@@bobbychuckles8764
How could they prove it to you?
If you’re so ignorant it could be tough.
"it would be easier to just go to the moon than to fake it "
Neil Degrasse Tyson
sameed yousuf I call bullshit on that
@@madkins77765 straight bullshit lmao
Guys don't forget it was the 60s. There was no CGI yet. Not even by a long shot. Trying to make an entire planet believe that a fake moon landing is real seems nearly impossible to me. So yeah I agree with Tyson that it must've been way easier to actually go there.
absolutely retarded statement from a fake scientist
@@Agaetis181 you don't know how hard it would have been to fake the moon
He got that “hey play with something safe” phone call
A note on those Michael Collins photographs:
There are no publications from NASA of that Michael Collins photo, nor are there any publications which suggest that it is from a real space walk. The image appears in some issues of Collins' autobiography, with the caption clearly stating that it was taken during a training exercise. Moon hoax theorist Ralph Rene first claimed that these images were passed off as genuine space walk photographs.
In 2003, space historian James Oberg offered Rene 10,000 dollars for any edition of the Collins autobiography that described the doctored photograph as a spacewalk snapshot. Rene was unable to provide one, and so far nobody else has either.
You see this a lot in many flat-earth "proofs". They will take one picture, extremely out of context, and say "See! Its proof of flat earth!"
Saddening, really.
Its probably a troll from the outside, someone that just wanted to make fun of them and see how far will they go with it.
All I'm saying, is that during a time when we as a civilization had such little understanding of technology that the internet had not even been invented yet, during a time when the floppy disk had not even been invented yet, during a time when the telephones still needed cords&wires... You're gonna tell me during this time that we were advanced enough into the age of technology to make it all the way to the moon 6 times...and we haven't been back since. You're gonna tell me that even though these telephones needed cords to operate, that somehow we as a civilization were advanced enough to communicate with these astronauts who were 100's of thousands of miles away... Through some strong ass radio waves?? I can't even get the radio to come in from my local station...
This is what you are tryna have me believe?
@@whocares892 Yes
THANK YOU
i like how joe admitted his faults in the situation, and made rational and logical steps to fix it. This ability to correct oneself is one a rare and virtuous trait
Not bad for a racist 😂
Did he correct himself? Or was he correct the first time?
yeah it's such a logical way of thinking.......
were the videos fake?yes.
were the photos fake?yes.
was the moon landing fake?absolutely not.
if the moon landing was real,there wouldn't be a need to fake the video/photos.
ruclips.net/video/dFyXqWM_M0w/видео.html
@@bigoshify he’s not even racist, your jus unintelligent and believe what the media says, which proves to make people look worse than they are literally every single day. People like you make this life shit
This is why I admire Joe as a person. I may not agree with him on everything, but he's well read and always looking out for when he's wrong and how he could be better. That's a rare quality to find in a person.
not really
lol you and I must have very different life experiences then.
Whatever. He censors his true beliefs depending on who he's talking to. He genuinely believed Ronda Rousy could beat men in the ufc... Until she lost two rights.
Puff Ball he's hardly well read. reading random books doesn't make one well read, reading the books of conspiracy theory authors can actually make you more ignorant.
Pablog G
what random books are you referring to? i presume you have seen his library in person? no? didnt think so.
This is why I like you Joe. Doesn’t matter what the content is, you’re able to be honest. Keep up the great work.
"People are afraid to say *I don't know*"
Not Eddie Bravo lol
Lol that was his favorite phrase in the Alex Jones podcast "I'm just saying I don't know". What a buffoon
He only says I don't know after insisting he does know something
He says "look it up" .
@@pacmann. He says look it up because he was too stoned to remember whatever bullshit he heard on a youtube video lol
Darius Loera “ I’m CrAzY”-Eddie Bravo
The picture of Michael Collins' spacewalk is from his book and isn't attributed to NASA at all. It was doctored specifically to use as a visual representation of the event due to the fact there aren't any actual pictures of it. The camera they were using became loose and drifted off into space so all the images were lost. Collins says all this in the book and never claims that it's real, which no one ever mentions. It was *NEVER* published by NASA.
Typical conspiracy stuff....they dont seem to care much about facts.
charlie.g.hague ~ I wanna double thumbs up this comment
“The camera they were using became loose and drifted off into space so all images were lost” lmao you’re special
@@ArielBojorquez www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/07/522-how-come-eva-photo-of-michael.html
Just to add, his autobiography was published in the early to mid 70s long before the hoax stuff started to become insane in and of itself. I have inquired many aerospace engineers about the hoax and all of them, with a 40 year age differential (so at least 2 to 3 generations of engineers) point out that it is not just possible, but more than probable that the US landed on the moon. The technology was there and was built, with much of today's jet engines and other advanced rocket technology all based on the work done back in the late 60s.
Most of the other factors people bring up, like the lost footage and data, is actually explainable and not anything that leads to the concept of a hoax in any way. Early data of the B2 bomber was misplaced and lost and that was in 1987 (the B2 launching officially in 1989), in which they had to spend another two years of testing to get the B2 project off the ground. I know this because my own father worked on the B2 project and that info was openly disclosed to the public by Northrop Grumman after parts of the B2 project were disclosed by the government and made available to the public. So if the government can loose data on one of their most coveted stealth projects, then why not 20 years ago when it was the highest part of the Cold War when the various government agencies were loosing data and research left and right on all types of projects (some of it even proved to be lost in order to keep it away from the Soviets).
Also, they lost camera footage of the B2 test flights from the left wing because the damn camera fell off. Again, if it can happen on Earth under perfect testing conditions, it could and is more likely to happen in space (with regards to the camera drifting off into space). Engineers could only predict what could happen and most people who worked on the Apollo 11 project have stated that many things went wrong even through the mission was a success. Just because a layman doesn't understand the details doesn't mean that the details don't exists. Many documentaries and books have doctored photos in them that were not the photos provided by NASA. I would not be surprised that some of the photos being propped up as Hoax evidence were doctored photos and footage not from NASA, but made for the books and documentaries they came from and being thrown out as facts. Many Hoax sites don't even cite their photos or footage from real sources.
I remember buying a book where a Hoax site claimed one of the false NASA photos came from and I went, bought the book the site cited, and the photo was not in that book, nor were three others used as "proof" that the moon landing was a hoax. Perhaps because making a case for the moon landing Hoax is profitable conspiracy click-bait, people are willing to invest more effort into finding anything they can that would aid their case than to disprove their case, thus making many hoax creators no longer objective to the truth.
"space walk can't be the official term"
that would be shuttle shuffle
Moonwalk!
Don't you mean EVA ?
@@assistantto007 I was on my way to show off my superior intelligence and you beat me to it you bastard lol
Lmaoo
@@OFR Michael Jackson probably stole the term.
All of that set aside the fact that they cannot go to the moon in present day and have lost all of the data and knowledge of the trip to the moon is a little bewildering in itself
They can go to the moon still lol. China brought samples back from the moon only last week and NASA is sending another manned mission as soon as 2026. The difference is the leap in technology, before they used Saturn V an insanely powerful - yet outdated and hard to replicate rocket.. now they will be using SLS - a much more consistent and easier to replicate launch vehicle. These things take a lot of time to develop hence the gap in manned missions
I'm not even going to use scientific explanation to disagree with you but rather just use common sense the moon isnt just down the street its very far I have no doubt we can go there but getting there would cost billions and alot of political hurdles theres nothing there of substantial value that would require for a manned journey to be there as soon as possible
plus with everything so expensive you want to go to the moon now???💀💀
@@madara992well check out NASA's website because they are planning another manned moon landing.
Its not that we couldn't go after we went a few times the funding dried up any time we wanted to spend the money we could have went
"I can appreciate the mindset..." thats a very nice thing to say.
So... Why are people calling out Joe? He's admitting that he was wrong about the conspiracy...and changed his mind...
And he's being honest about it...
That's exactly what a wise man does
because they don't know how to take things in context, they hear the words of doubt come out of his mouth and their brain shuts off and they just get outraged and start posting. they're idiots.
@@odnettv4719 sorry that your little pea brain is incapable of critical thinking.
@@odnettv4719 really? Man, as a right-winger myself, your the type that gives us all a bad name. THIS is cucking out? Really? Reeeallly?
@@TheAlaskanfrog for one who said I'm a right winger, in response to the other dude how am I incapable of critical thinking if I don't believe the moon landings were real and am disagreeing with joe rogan which both require me to think critically since I am not agreeing with the majority
@@TheAlaskanfrog what evidence, you mean that he said, "I dont know enough about that so I shouldn't voice my opinion and assume its true"
10:06 Joe Rogan it wasn’t in Berlin. V-2 rocket factory was in Peenemünde and after city was bombarded by allies they moved to Poland to Blizne. I was born in city 10 miles from Blizne.
Rogan might be one of the most educated people on this Earth about the most controversial moments of our humanity , he has a collection of interviews that rivals any other organization on topics such as the pyramids, the moon, ufos… so many others. I have to tip my hat to him… he has managed to visit all these topics while still holding respect from just about every type of person regardless of beliefs or policial parties. ❤
Well stated, and I agree with you.
He changed his stance when Elon made it look easy whilst smoking a spliff
lmao
In Joe's defense he is entitled to open his mind to the idea of changing his mind. They call that a critical thinking skill that not many have. The spiff is a human construct that makes all the possibilities plausible.
He changed when his handlers told him to stop speaking out against them. He isn’t paid as well as he is, and put into positions to influence so many young impressionables just so he can call the powers that be dirty liars.
I always find it amusing how much people attribute power to people with an audience lol.. illuminati people crack me up. They all claim the most greedy, power hungry, and manipulative people in the world can somehow work together towards a common higher goal despite thier greed? Lolol yea right.. your mind is just doing what it does best.. making the irrational seem rational so a simpleton can understand it
T.D. McCarty I guess you’re talking to me? It’s hard to say for sure, since nobody here has made any prior mention of the Illuminati. You’re the simpleton if you are actually so naive that you don’t believe the richest of the rich don’t do everything within their power to preserve their power, and everything just happens by nature. I mean sure, your explaination is so much more rational. If you’re listening to a guy that has his mind changed over what someone tells him while he’s stoned, then you are obviously of far superior intellect. You should be invited to sit in with the bilderberg group. Oh, yeah. Never mind. They don’t exist.
One question for you, boy genius. Did we land on the moon, or not? Save you cute little insults, and your talking down. You’ve already done too much that.just answer the question. Please. Thanks.
“It’s rocket science” was hilarious. Too bad joe missed that as a comedian.
I think he appreciated it, smiled in his head and his guest felt the vibe because he was waiting for his question and he was so serious and concentrated on the topic he continued to move forward so he didn’t lose concentration
Was just a fact
@Francisco Nieves damn, real shame that nobody gives a shit huh?
I came here looking for a comment about that joke
At least it's not bicycle science.
Joe’s ability to re-examine his previous beliefs or assumptions in such a humble manner, and admits mistakes all while holding himself accountable, are very rare traits in any person these days.
This is why so many of us respect him and makes his podcast the biggest on the planet
Hats off to you man….
shutup Lol
@@Incubussublime311 🤡
Either that or he got a big enough check to change his mind.
It's funny cause while I do disagree with you, it's because I still think he's a conspiracy lunatic pushing junk science, and that he regressed from this position.
It's called being a controlled opposition, joe can't say what he really thinks and believes on his podcast for obvious reasons 💀
What about Indian moon landing. Looks like an old 80s Atari graphics lol
It was a graphical illustration. Not a live video feed lol
Is the moon even real?
PE/\KE its fake
Well, its the only known object/moon in space, that doesnt rotate around its own axis. We always see that same side of the moon, hence "The dark side of the moon". Take a second and think about that...
And in some old chinese texts there are alot of times they refeer to "the time before the moon" - Sounds like it hasn't always been there...
PE/\KE A lot of people have been linking saturn and the moon sayin it kinda works like a projector...
Peter Leidecker It DOES rotate on it's own axis. This has been proven. It just rotates in tandem with it's own orbit.
Another thing to consider is that the Soviet Union never accused the US of faking the moon landings. You'd think if it we never went there not only would the Soviets be able to tell but they'd be the first ones to blow the whistle. But they didn't.
Or maybe the Soviets didn't go there either? ;)
John Smith... Good point
The Soviets didnt 'go' but they were tracking the whole mission for sure, both Radar and radio intercepts and if there was anything suspect they would have everything to gain by revealing it and making NASA and the US look stupid.
maybe soviet never went into space and maybe that same reason they are quiet, no reason to snitch when you got basket full of lies. :D
The Russians would have been able to receive the transmissions from the moon. Beyond that, they would know that the transmissions were originating on the moon. Other advanced nations could do the same thing. There's no mystery here.
theres a very simple way to resolve this thing. just go back in time and see for yourself what happened.
Who has time?
Ricardo montalban that is very deep. in the space between events im going to think about that.
Jeffery Lord lul unappreciated response
Ricardo montalban
I got some extra time if you need some. I’ll hook you up
@@ricardomontalban6004 I have the time - just crowd-fund the mission and I'd do it.
This why I listen to Joe. He’s so objective and open minded. Even to a fault. He is willing to admit and understand he doesn’t know everything.
For anyone confused about them “looking different” you can learn exactly why this happened online. The astronauts had to learn how to move a 300lb restrictive suit in 1/6th gravity. The suit was lighter but very restrictive. They had to learn all new mechanics for moving around. Regular walking didn’t work. First guys wobbled a bit and shared their data when they got home. Next teams tried new mechanics and found that bouncing worked. Later missions were a combination of bouncing and bounding. There’s a lot of footage of astronauts trying out new ways to walk and falling on their asses.
can you put a link of them falling on their asses? that sounds super entertaining
Yep, that's true. At one point they realized skipping was easier than walking.
Yip they tried everything from 1 foot to shuffling. Some of its pretty funny too. Also not one rocket or craft was the same as the one before. Every one was an improvement as they learnt more. Hence the buggy on later missions. I wouldnt be surprised if the suits changed too.
Robert C. Christian people haven’t bothered to watch it because they make off the cuff assessments and don’t form their opinions based on objectivity
Do you think we can travel through the van Allen belts without preparing or even knowing?
I always thought the best evidence for the moon landing being real was that it was never shat on by the Soviet Union
Exactly.
@@lee99000 stfu. The iron curtain doesn’t exist anymore. If they had doubted the Moon landing we would have known today.
Exactly right. I could question everything else but the Soviets would've known if we faked it. The debate is over with that.
@TheAwwyee Fudging grain exports is one thing, faking the moon landing is something else. They would've disseminated the word among their own people and by banging their shoes at the UN. We would've called them liars and most Americans would believe it but it would still be out in the open. Most people in the world do not mind seeing the USA knocked down a peg or three. It's way too spicey of a meatball to leave hanging out there.
@TheAwwyee Well that's it then. You've cracked the case!
This clip breaks Eddie Bravos heart 🤣
Joe you are right, film used to get damaged in early xray machines at airports. Later they started saying that new machines wouldn’t damage the film but i used to still not let them pass exposed film just in case. I used to work in film production from early 2001-2008
Good job Joe. I think that the true sign of intelligence is to be able to take in information and to change your opinion based on that information
Daniel B
Yeah good Job.
But no..that's really not what intelligence is. That's conformity and being able to learn
The earth flat he knows that. He is now controlled opposition probably by force
@@nielsm.2147 Conformity and being able to learn, to not be stubborn or ignorant in your attitude towards certain ideas based on personal preference at the time is generally considered intelligent behaviour.
He clearly still thinks it was faked as this whole video is him talking about the evidence towards it, then saying he's not a rocket scientist so he's not aloud to form an opinion.
@@nielsm.2147 what's intelligence
Joe 'We definitely without a doubt 100 percent most likely probably might have absolutely landed on the Moon' Rogan
80% of the time it works every time
IMO, Joe's flip/flop statements are the product of a man who knows the truth(of course the moon landings are a lie!) but he's been told or warned to back off of that conspiracy. If anyone thinks Joe has free reign, they're dreaming! The same evil people that control our gov'ts, control ALL media.
Losing his job would be the least of it. Joe or anyone from his family can be framed & jailed, taken out/ "commit suicide" as fast as any of us.
We have quotes from past presidents & congressman saying they know the hidden power(shadow gov't) behind the scenes and they know what not to say and what lines not to cross(John & Bobby Kennedy, for example, had a nasty habit of crossing those lines).
Bottom line, even if Joe's loyalty was 100% on the people's side(which I highly doubt), he would know or be told what lines not to cross or they'd just get another puppet.. I mean person to do the job
Tarrell Freeze you’re a paranoid douche
BLNK BLNKRSN hypocrite
@@t-boog2173 yeah cause shooting a big bullet at a rock in the sky sounds sooooo fkn impossible
"joe why did you change your mind on the moon landing conspiracy?"
"well i had Neil Degrasse Tyson on and he brought it up and I didn't want to look like an idiot"
moofasa1211 The "psychics" of helicopters... Jesus fucking Christ.
@moofasa1211 "the psychics of helicopters"
I'm picking up a strong '50 cal' sensation over here. Does the tail number 690720N have significance to anybody? Maybe with a camouflage paint?
zedmelon yeah I crashed my chopper a while back when I was fucked up and fled the scene
moofasa1211 idiot
alx, no shit! rogan gets bit by conspiracy bug.
Saturn v rocket was the most complex machine man ever created when our nation was at its strongest. We could never waste the resources on a project of that magnitude without sacrificing our military superiority that maintains our quality of life.
Mmmkay....We could waste the resources on Ukraine though, right 🇺🇦😉
@@darrinbrooks5916 that was kind of my point. Heaven forbid we do something resourceful with the global GDP it's so sad a fraction of 1% of the people dictate the world order
We maintain 750 military bases outside of our country USA them resources alone would maintain a small colony on Mars but the price of oil would probably be $200+ and we wouldn't be able to maintain our quality of life $25 gallon for fuel
I love how Joe can be impartial to the point of learning from his own mistakes and look at it objectively and with such logical reasoning. That's a great thinker. Healthy mind. Loved it.
Come on. That nitwit thought the moon landing was faked. Weren’t there about 6 of them? He’s a dope.
rogan logical? hes super rich. so what? hes still basically a dullard. love his show though. Rogan is proof that ANYONE can make it , and Rogan, an anyone, has!!
Healthy mind! Well said!!
I love people like this, he questions everything and is not afraid to change his stance on a topic because of evidence.
Yeah gotta love all the new evidence from 1969... In case you didn't notice it's 2018.
SafeDreamer Music lmao, in what way is he in danger?
What evidence?
liam white Rogan is the worst kind of shill. He initially supported controversial ideas to create a following for his podcast. Now he's popular he's turning mainstream.
Chris Stuart Is it really hard to believe that maybe Joe just changed his mind?
His guest seems like a fantastic guy.
Evan Brown Arian Foster, former NFL running back. Recently retired.
Fake ass goofy ass nigga trying to come so smart and cool
how is he fake?
"I'm a big fan"
"thankyou"
"appreciate it" lol what a dumb fucker
what a dumb fuck using manners .... smh
Video is 7 years old, but the last minute is probably the most important nowadays
This is probably the single most important conversation that I've ever heard from Joe Rogan. Be humble in what you believe, and try to see things from all sides. We need to compare what we know with what new things we've learned and adapt to a better argument.
If only he was like this now.
I thought the same thing! This is a look at someone who literally said: "I had to critique myself". That's something we ALL, including myself, need to acknowledge. Not just "today", but through time
@@robertbranscum6883 he is though...
@@robertbranscum6883 What do you mean by that
@@Jay-tr9ff thx
"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders
Shake and bake
Best comment in this thread.
The Earth is a hollow triangular pyramid and we live on the inside.
It's also spinning on it's point, drilling a hole into the 4th dimension.
What do you 2 know 🤔
Stay woke
jim jimjim Which one?! A triangular pyramid has four points.
It's also flat and sits on the back of a cosmic turtle
This is the reason why I watch Joe. His humility and in-depth courage to be introspective is uncommon amongst podcasters today. Most podcasters are cowards in fear of being human. Our minds are malleable. Most of our ideas and preconceived notions aren't ours. They come from our experiences, interactions, and debates with others who may or may not be educated on the subject.
the you tube wormhole: started with Chris cornell tributes and ended up here..
haha that's where I began as well..
joey weird I just finished the church with Joey Diaz and Jesus trejo and your name is Joey and my Avi is Jesus the astronaut; This video is talking about moon landings and the podcast ended with break these chains by Cornell. ? Wormhole coincidence? Idk
joey I'm sorry for you.
Chris Cornell was the greatest of all time
The fact that people are discussing his "change of stance" as if it's bold is why the world is so stupid today.
Ditto
Yeah, I can kinda agree, I don't see people change their stances on stupid things like this very often, I think that fact is a symptom of the world being stupid rather than it being the cause. But yeah, I can kinda agree that it is stupid that they are praising him over it
It is bold, because we as a species are primed to assign value to consistency, so you don't wanna come out as someone who changes his position on things often or at all to the public. But there could be a reverse effect where people go like" he knows the risk of disclosing thay he changed his mind, but he does it however, so that shows courage and integrity." so you get points for it.
@NeoLegolasSkywalkerStark
Your comment suggests you are leaving yourself out of that equation which is another problem with this world. Everybody is so quick to call everyone else stupid while pretending they are one of the few smart ones. That's about as stupid as it gets.
@@markula_4040 yup lets give everyone participation trophies.
"Ignorance is a gift. It gives you the opportunity to learn new stuff."
That's my running back. We miss you, bro.
oh do this is Arian Foster? I figured it was him
@@mjz22 who's Arian Foster
@@Revok7272 stop it, you don’t know who he is?
He retired 4 years ago bruh
@@Revok7272 Yes, I'm well aware.
Was I the only one shouting E.V.A. !! at the computer? (Extra Vehicular Activities).
I love when that guy accused Buzz Aldrin of being part of the moon landing "conspiracy" and Aldrin punched him. Loved it!
TBF he punched him because he'd been following Aldrin around harassing and insulting him with his family. It was only after putting up with that for a while that he slugged him.
Buzz should keep a Moon rock with him at all times and just smash deniers in the face with it
@@rgmedia318 u mean the petrified wood rocks?
If you see the video, that's putting what the moron did lightly. He followed him around saying "swear on the bible you went to the moon.. swear on the bible" like a fucking lunatic.. Which is funny lunatic comes from moon.. Hadn't thought about that until i wrote that.
He kept following him and following him.. Until he punched him. Wasn't unprovoked and it wasn't a spur of the moment thing.
Michael Burgess: yep. TO THE MOON, ALICE!
My Dad was an aeronautical engineering for NASA and was able to take my sisters and I to the Smithsonian Institute for Air and Space to tell us all about the space program...he was able to show his little girls the part on the Moon Lander that he helped design... there is no reason for him to have done such a thing, to have made the effort to teach his daughters about what he had done in his life, if it was a hoax...it was just a little coil thingamajig, but it's on the Moon and my Dad was a part of that... I couldn't be more proud that my Dad helped accomplish such an amazing feat...
Lisa Jacobs That sounds like an amazing thing. I would have loved to have been there listening to him explain. My uncle worked for NASA as well, in the photography so he dealt with all kinds of cameras and the pictures they took. I could listen to him talk all day even though many times it gets waaay too advanced, and consider I did great physics in college. Great post, Lisa.
@@easleyrider ✌️🤗
that's all the proof I need, also your dad is cool!
@@christopherrodriguez103 Awe, thanks ✌️
My dad worked for NASA also he told me just go with the flow and you will have Job security for life
Eddie Bravo is smirking, massaging his goatee right now.
My dad used to say that he recalled being underwhelmed when he saw the actual footage of the first landing as they’d done very convincing mock-ups in TV studios and dramatic interpretations of the landings.
Have you seen some of that mock ups? They look like grade school play productions.
That the video wasn’t great and the moon is very barren doesn’t make you dad’s reaction important to the world.
Dudes got his ego in the right place. Respect
Its all the DMT he smokes
Hes a lying shill gatekeeper
@@trifectat8694 have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia
@@trifectat8694 bet you’ve been offend by an opinion of his that doesn’t effect you in any shape or form
@@trifectat8694 Yup
Joe “I haven’t been to the moon but I’ve tried moon dust” Rogan
Salt he’s also probably smoked moonrocks
😂 😝💨
Moon rocks, baby ;)
Joe: The "technical" term for a "space walk" is EVA (extravehicular activity). You're welcome. ;-)
Thanks. I was wondering about that.
The technical term for getting out of your car is extravehicular activity.
Phew ! Phenomenal nomenclature, glad you clarified it, thanks.
Now I'm going to the cocoa bean dispenser to add some atoms of Hydrogen (2 of) and Oxygen (1 of) at 20°C at sea level to boil at 100°C.
Or you could say I'm going to make a cup of coffee.
Outer space isnt real, and you've have been sold a false bill of goods. You're welcome.
@@rickyleahey9286
I knew that. I saw the Truman Show too. :-)
this is one of the most human conversations ever not only u get new infos but also life lessons about being humble powerful jre is d best
Joe “it’s entirely possible” Rogan
Joe "i have the most original comment" Rogan .. never saw
Joe Rogan is comfortably numb.
"Space walk" is the colloquial term for EVA (Extravehicular Activity).
I would call it an excursion.That's what divers do when they leave the diving bell.
That helmet looks like a fish bowl and is stupid
Searched through the comments to find this
Oh, I thought it meant exterior vehicle adventure, I knew that was wrong tho.
There's still data missing from this. Washing your car is an extravehicular activity
A human being actually understands and acknowledges that he might have confirmation bias? Joe Rogan is a hero!
except he believes in a false conspiracy, he's an idiot. your hero is a moron on steroids
@@alexandermacdougall7873 But my entire point is that if you could show him why it's a false conspiracy, he will understand and agree without fussing over cognitive bias.
Surely you've found some damming evidence that the rest of us haven't seen? Otherwise perhaps YOU are guilty of cognitive and confirmation bias.
15:20 Absolutely spot on. The people passing opinions on what is or is not fake often, in fact mostly, have from what I observe, very poor knowledge of basics sciences. They happily denounce true occurrences with zero understanding of the topic and if called out they denounce you, or walk away, refusing to eat their BS words.
define science.