On the left side you seem to lift the weight a significant amount with your hand. Seemingly there is pressure from the weight onto your hand before the highest point is reached. I'm confident to bet that an automized catch would seem less promising rotation.
I like this one. Oscillations instead of spinning is cool. And this one combines it, oh my. Have you looked into hydrostatic pressure btw? Or rather, what is called the hydrostatic paradox. Not sure why it's called a paradox, but seemed intresting. A 10 meter tube, and a lifting pad with an area of 1 square meter, gives 10 tons (theoretical) of lifting force. Though it would also need a decent amount of water to lift (or extend) any useful distance. Don't think a 1 square meter lifiting pad is practical, but it makes for easier calculations (and BIGGER and more impressive numbers). And yes, hydrostatic pressure is the thing that crushes submarines when they dive too deep. It depends on the density of the liquid and the height (or depth). I was mostly curious if it could be used to make a hydrostatic motor. Still am. Probaly not, but uhm, yes, it is an intresting thing. Key is the pressure. 1 bar is 1 kg pr square centimeter. 10 meter height gives 1 bar. 1 meter heigth gives 0.1 bar. Which does not sound like much, but 1 meter heigth, and 100 square centimeters (10x10 centimeters) gives 10 kg of initial force. And 0.5 meter tube gives 5kg for the same 100 square centimeters. I guess 10 centimeters would give 1 kg unless my math is way off , or pressure works differently then i thought.
Wow, that is amazing!! Your best video to date!!
great concept!
On the left side you seem to lift the weight a significant amount with your hand. Seemingly there is pressure from the weight onto your hand before the highest point is reached. I'm confident to bet that an automized catch would seem less promising rotation.
My initial thoughts: That looks amazing and simple. I did a quick sim. The sim doesn't show a gain. More to come...
very interesting!
I like this one. Oscillations instead of spinning is cool. And this one combines it, oh my.
Have you looked into hydrostatic pressure btw? Or rather, what is called the hydrostatic paradox. Not sure why it's called a paradox, but seemed intresting.
A 10 meter tube, and a lifting pad with an area of 1 square meter, gives 10 tons (theoretical) of lifting force. Though it would also need a decent amount of water to lift (or extend) any useful distance. Don't think a 1 square meter lifiting pad is practical, but it makes for easier calculations (and BIGGER and more impressive numbers).
And yes, hydrostatic pressure is the thing that crushes submarines when they dive too deep. It depends on the density of the liquid and the height (or depth). I was mostly curious if it could be used to make a hydrostatic motor. Still am. Probaly not, but uhm, yes, it is an intresting thing.
Key is the pressure. 1 bar is 1 kg pr square centimeter. 10 meter height gives 1 bar. 1 meter heigth gives 0.1 bar. Which does not sound like much, but 1 meter heigth, and 100 square centimeters (10x10 centimeters) gives 10 kg of initial force. And 0.5 meter tube gives 5kg for the same 100 square centimeters. I guess 10 centimeters would give 1 kg unless my math is way off , or pressure works differently then i thought.
I'm also trying like you, I think we both has same goal shall we teem up and work together.
Cela parait simple, mais ce n'est pas simple 😁